DISPLACED AIR CARBONATION (DAC) PROCESS AND SYSTEM

Abstract

The present invention relates to the use of carbon dioxide gas to cure concrete media by applying a pressure differential created through a partial replacement of the original ambient volume of air present in a curing enclosure with pure CO2 gas.

Claims

1. Use of carbon dioxide gas to cure concrete media by applying a pressure differential created through a partial replacement of the original ambient volume of air present in a curing enclosure with pure CO.sub.2 gas.

2. The use of claim 1, comprising an air displacement step preceding carbonation intended for creating suction and achieving sub-atmospheric pressures within the curing enclosure between 0 and 5 psig.

3. The use of claim 1, comprising a purging step preceding carbonation where CO.sub.2 gas is continuously flowed into the curing enclosure to displace partial volumes of ambient air through an open outlet, where the outlet is closed when the exhausted air reaches a concentration of CO.sub.2 that exceeds 10,000 ppm.

4. The use of claim 3, wherein after the purging step, the curing enclosure reaches an internal CO.sub.2 concentration between 20 and 50%.

5. The use of claim 2, comprising a further step of regimented injection of CO.sub.2 until an internal pressure between 0 and +2 psig is reached and kept constant for the duration of carbonation processing whereby the pressure differential is to create sufficient pressure-head for better gas diffusion within concrete material and to improve carbonation reaction.

6. The use of claim 1 wherein a need for pressure during carbonation is marginalized.

7. The use of claim 1 for the preparation of precast or dry-cast concrete products, reinforced and non-reinforced.

8. The use of claim 7, wherein the precast or dry-cast concrete products are selected from the group consisting of masonry units, pavers, synthetic stone, bricks, hollow-core slabs, pipe, wall panels, fiber-cement boards, and retaining walls.

9. The use of claim 1 wherein the concrete curing enclosure is selected from the group consisting of kiln, chamber, autoclave, vessel, tent, wherein the enclosure is designed or modified to be air-tight and capable of withstanding marginal deviations in pressure both below and above ambient conditions.

10. A displaced air carbonation system using carbon dioxide gas to cure concrete media which comprises, an airtight and pressurizable chamber having a composite polyurethane/polyurea sprayed inner lining with a flexible or rigid door assembly, wherein a pressure differential is applied and created through the partial replacement of original ambient volume of air present in a curing enclosure with pure CO.sub.2 gas.

11. The displaced air carbonation system of claim 10, wherein the door assembly is constructed from any one or a combination of materials that include polymer, plastic, aluminum, and/or steel.

12. The displaced air carbonation system of claim 10, wherein the composite inner lining consists of a primary layer of Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) ranging in thickness from 25 to 50 mm, and a secondary layer of polyurea ranging between 2 and 10 mm thickness, where the composite lining is intended to alleviate internal stresses arising from the system's applied pressure differential.

13. A kit to transform a chamber system into an airtight and pressurizable enclosure comprising a composite polyurethane/polyurea sprayed inner lining a polymer sheet door assembly.

14. The kit of claim 13, wherein the composite inner lining consists of a primary layer of Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) ranging in thickness from 25 to 50 mm, and a secondary layer of polyurea ranging between 2 and 10 mm thickness.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0024] Further features and advantages of the present disclosure will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:

[0025] FIG. 1 illustrates a process flow diagram of the DAC process for standard 20 cm concrete masonry unit (CMU) production;

[0026] FIG. 2 illustrates a schematic illustration of a typical full-scale curing chamber converted to a DAC curing system;

[0027] FIG. 3 illustrates a cross-section of the DAC system's composite inner wall lining;

[0028] FIG. 4 illustrates a DAC curing system before and after commencing carbonation curing;

[0029] FIG. 5 illustrates a DAC system prototype;

[0030] FIG. 6 illustrates a prototype's air displacement exhaust system;

[0031] FIG. 7 illustrates (a) enclosure loaded with standard 20 cm CMU blocks; (b) a 5 mm Neoprene polymer sheet securely fastened making the enclosure air-tight; and

[0032] FIG. 8 illustrates DAC enclosure system when deflated via suction, and when later inflated to a constant pressure of 0.5 psig during carbonation.

[0033] It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0034] DAC Process

[0035] The DAC process presents a methodology for curing concrete articles using carbon-dioxide in lieu of steam (the conventional curing route). Steam generation consumes water and natural gas, both of which are averted with the DAC process. Further savings can be realized from the reduction of cement, the most expensive raw material, with no compromise in meeting building code specifications. Carboclave concrete products outperform commercial benchmarks in areas of environmental and durability performance, as well as demonstrate considerable improvements in chemical and physical resilience. The DAC process applies to precast concrete products (steel reinforced and non-reinforced) including, but not limited to, concrete masonry units, pavers, pipes, fiber cement boards, and hollow-core slabs. The process can be adapted to existing steam curing systems through physical retrofit modifications without incurring large, non-recoverable capital costs. FIG. 1 is a process flow diagram detailing the steps of the DAC process for 20 cm CMU (concrete masonry unit) production.

[0036] The individual steps in FIG. 1 are described in more details below,

[0037] i. Block forming: This step follows conventional block forming practices, with the only difference being the possibility of proportioning lower cement content. The high strength achieved by the CO.sub.2-processed blocks allows for partial offset of cement content (up to 25%) through direct content reduction and/or replacement by cementitious fillers.

[0038] ii. Pre-setting: Pre-setting is an important priming step, entailing the close monitoring and control of water-loss experienced by the blocks prior to carbonation. Loss of water creates spaces within the paste component of the wet blocks, thus facilitating the diffusion of CO.sub.2 and achieving optimal carbonation degrees. From previous extensive parametric studies, a mass loss in the range of 30 to 50% of the total water in the blocks yields choice results in terms of reaction. The residual water content in the block is somewhat of a critical parametertoo much and CO.sub.2 diffusion is hindered as a result of blockage; too little, and cement grains do not engage in reaction due to water starvation. An optimum water content needs to be maintained prior to CO.sub.2 exposure. Water in fact serves two vital purposes: it is the medium wherein the CO.sub.2 gas solvates and calcium-silicates dissolve; and a reactant in the ensuing multi-step carbonation reaction that generates the composite binding matrix of CSH (calcium-silicate-hydrate) and CaCO.sub.3.

C.sub.3S: 2(3CaO.SiO.sub.2)+3CO.sub.2+3H.sub.2O.fwdarw.3CaO.2SiO.sub.2.3H.sub.2O+3CaCO.sub.3(1) [1]

C.sub.2S: 2(2CaO.SiO.sub.2)+CO.sub.2+3H.sub.2O.fwdarw.3CaO.2SiO.sub.2.3H.sub.2O+CaCO.sub.3(2) [2]

[0039] Equations (1) and (2) present the generic stoichiometric reactions of cement's main constituents, tri-calcium (C.sub.3S) and di-calcium silicates (C.sub.2S), respectively, during carbonation. The CO.sub.2 gas is ultimately converted into stable CaCO.sub.3. Both CSH and CaCO.sub.3 nucleate in pores previously occupied by water in the wet paste. The CSH hydrate is generally known to be responsible for the binding strength of hardened concrete. The rate of formation of this phase is considerably accelerated when calcium-silicates are activated by CO.sub.2. Early works by Young et al. [1] and Bukowski et al. [2] showed rapid consolidation of calcium-silicate powders subject to short periods of pure CO.sub.2 exposure, where they correlate the effect to an equally rapid generation of CSH.

[0040] Drying was quantified by monitoring the weight change experienced by representative blocks. The sought drying degree was simplified to an absolute final target weight, based on the formula of Equation 3, which also takes into account the aggregates' absorption property. The equation calculates the weight drop that needs to be experienced by a single block, considering a target loss of 35% of the total water content in this case. Achieving the weight drop marks the end of the pre-setting step. For example, the WL.sub.35% for a NW block with an initial weight of 16.8 kg, and an aggregate absorption of 3%, is 0.349 kg.

WL.sub.35%=[(N.sub.agg.A.sub.agg.)(M.sub.block% Water)]35%(3) [0041] WL.sub.35%: Mass of 35% target water loss [0042] M.sub.Agg.: Mass of aggregates in block [0043] A.sub.Agg.: Absorption of aggregates [0044] M.sub.Block: Mass of block

[0045] iii. Carbonation: This step is carried out after the suitably primed concrete products are placed in a curing enclosure and sealed. Once secured air-tight, the enclosure is subject to suction (via use of pump, venturi, compressor, etc. . . . ) for the partial displacement of the ambient volume of air originally present in the enclosure. This can result in a partial vacuum state, possibly recording sub-atmospheric pressures within the enclosure between 0.00 and 5.00 psig. This state is held only briefly until the pressure is brought back to atmospheric (0 psig), and up to a maximum of 2.00 psig, with the injection of CO.sub.2 gas. The main purpose of the ve/+ve pressure differential is to create sufficient pressure-head for better gas diffusion within the concrete material, and, therefore, improved carbonation reaction.

[0046] During carbonation, the injection of CO.sub.2 gas is carefully regimented to ensure that the concrete media soaks its targeted capacity of CO.sub.2 for the given curing conditions and timeframe. This self-cleaning feature was developed to make sure that the injected gas is fully consumed by the concreteavoiding gas release to the atmosphere at the end of the carbonation cycle. A regulator is used to ensure that the carbonation pressure (between 0 and 2 psig) within the enclosure is precisely maintained. A pressure drop ensues when concrete absorbs CO.sub.2, prompting the regulator to counter by replenishing the enclosure with more gas. A flowmeter is used to quantify the total amount of CO.sub.2 injected. Once the target capacity of gas that could be absorbed by the concrete charge is reached, the gas supply is then stopped.

[0047] To quantify the amount of CO.sub.2 that can be absorbed by a concrete charge, Eq. 4 can be used. This will enable precise proportioning of gas injection during carbonation.

Q.sub.CO2=NM.sub.unit(% Binder)U.sub.CO2(4)

[0048] Where, [0049] Q.sub.CO2: Quantity of total CO.sub.2 gas to be injected per charge, Kg [0050] N: Number of concrete units charged for curing (e.g. blocks, pavers, pipes) [0051] M.sub.unit: Average mass of an individual unit, Kg [0052] % Binder: % proportion of binder (i.e. cement) in concrete mix design, % [0053] U.sub.CO2: Target CO.sub.2 uptake, expressed as % binder mass (usually between 15-25%), %

[0054] Equation 4 generally applies to precast concrete. From extensive previous trials, the amount of CO.sub.2 that could potentially be sequestered by a concrete unit (U.sub.CO2), under the prescribed processing conditions, is conservatively assumed equivalent to 20% of the initial mass of cement. For example, considering 10 standard normal-weight 20 cm concrete masonry units (CMU), with an average weight of 17 kg per unit and a cement content of 9.7%, the quantity of CO.sub.2 that could potentially be absorbed by the charge is 3.3 kg (Q.sub.CO2=1017 kg9.7%20%).

[0055] DAC System

[0056] The assembly of the DAC curing system is detailed in this section, with the described embodiment adaptable to both new and existing steam curing installations. Adaptation generally transforms any curing system (kiln, vessel, chamber, etc. . . . ) into an air-tight enclosure, capable of withstanding a pressure differential ranging from 5 psig during suction and up to 2 psig during carbonation. FIG. 2 illustrates a typical full-scale DAC curing system, representing a modified version of the most commonly used steam-curing chamber. The inset of the figure is a close-up of the wall cross section, which reveals a composite inner lining composed of two successively sprayed layers. The wall cross section reveals a composite polyurethane/polyurea inner lining. The first layer is a 25-50 mm thick Spray Polyurethane Foam (SPF) material, usually used for insulation purposes in construction. The second layer is that of a flexible polyurea material ranging in thickness between 2 and 10 mm. Both materials exhibit high tolerance for elastic deformation.

[0057] The composite lining alleviates stresses acting on the interior walls of the enclosure and arising from the applied pressure differential. It creates a bladder-like compartment that considerably negates dimensional changes imposed during operation. The air displacement step prior to carbonation is administered to create suction and achieve a sub-atmospheric pressure anywhere between 0 and 5 psig. However, the vacuum effect is kept marginal to avoid delamination of the inner lining. When the concrete-loaded enclosure is inflated during carbonation, the internal pressure buildup is mostly contained by the lining through material tension and deformation. FIG. 3 illustrates the internal load dissipation during inflation. The polyurea layer experiences a slight volumetric expansion, which translates into tensile forces within the material. The expansion additionally results in the dimensional deformation of the SPF layer (), which in turn absorbs some of the load created by the internal pressure. The dual alleviation effect presented by the composite inner lining minimizes the direct pressure acting on the actual chamber walls. In this manner, a non-compressible chamber can be converted into an airtight, compressible curing setup, without incurring any major structural modifications to the chamber.

[0058] There are many types of sprayed and non-sprayed polyurethane foam and polyurea coatings that can be used whose composition, density, and mechanical properties vary significantly. Not to restrict the invention to using a specific product or brand, a general material conformity criteria is presented to ensure proper application of the inner lining component. The primary foam (SPF or other spray foams) layer needs to be adhesive, porous, and slightly malleable such that it is elastically compressible when a load is acting on the inner lining. The SPF layer is preferred to be medium-density closed-cell spray foam (ccSPF). Light-density open-cell spray foam (ocSPF) can also be used. The secondary polyurea layer (or other equivalent spray polymer or elastomer material) needs to be seamless, highly adhesive, and possess superior tensile strength (>20 MPa) and capable of achieving >200% elongation. Self-healing elastomer polyurea can also be used. In general, any lining system, comprised of one or more components, conforming to the abovementioned attributes, and serving the intended functionality, can be interchangeable with the prescribed embodiments.

[0059] Another important feature of the DAC system is the door assembly, where a flexible polymer sheet is used and affixed to the open-end of the enclosure. After the concrete charge is loaded, the polymer door is tightly fastened/clamped such that the enclosure is completely air-tight. The thickness of the door can be adjusted according to the required tensile properties (>20 MPa). Prior to carbonation, the suction pump is used to partially displace the ambient volume of air present in the enclosure. The flexible polymer door provides a visual indicator for this step, where the sheet would deflate internally. Once a sufficient amount of air is exhausted, carbonation is commenced by injecting CO.sub.2 gas until the enclosure becomes inflated and an internal pressure between 0 and 2 psig is maintained throughout the course of carbonation. Again, the polymer sheet protrudes outward during carbonation, as shown in FIG. 4. Carbonation is prolonged until the target quantity of CO.sub.2 (Q.sub.CO2) is fully injected.

[0060] Proof-of-Concept

[0061] A scaled-down proof-of-concept of the DAC system and process was carried out at the site of a concrete masonry unit (CMU) plant. Locally produced CMU blocks were subjected to DAC processing using the prototype shown in FIG. 5. For the enclosure, a wooden box was used with its interior first sprayed with a 50 mm thick SPF layer (Bayseal 2.7 Insulthane by Elastochem), followed by a 2 mm layer of polyurea (9511 HT by Elastochem). High-purity liquefied CO.sub.2 gas was used, with injection controlled by a fine range valve and regulator. FIG. 6 shows the air displacement exhaust system. A venturi pump was used to create the suction needed to partially displace the ambient volume of air prior to carbonation.

[0062] Once the primed concrete blocks are placed inside the enclosure (FIG. 7(a)), a 5 mm Neoprene polymer sheet is securely fastened using screws and a high-pressure sealant (X-Trasil H.T.), as shown in FIG. 7(b). Air within the enclosure was then evacuated using the venturi pump, with the pressure gauge reading a sub-atmospheric pressure of 3 psig after 5 to 10 minutes. The resulting suction resulted in an inward deflection of the polymer sheet, like shown in FIG. 8. The injection of CO.sub.2 gas was commenced shortly after until a positive pressure of 0.5 psig was achieved and maintained throughout the carbonation step, which lasted about 10 hours. FIG. 8 also shows the inflated state of the enclosure during carbonation. Carbonation was prolonged until the target quantity of CO.sub.2, that could be absorbed by the blocks, was supplied (Q.sub.CO2=1.33 kg CO.sub.2 using Eq. 4).

[0063] The final blocks achieved an average CO.sub.2 uptake of 310 g and an average 1-day compressive strength of 38 MPa.

[0064] While preferred embodiments have been described above and illustrated in the accompanying drawings, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made without departing from this disclosure. Such modifications are considered as possible variants comprised in the scope of the disclosure.

REFERENCES

[0065] Young, J. F.; Berger, R. L.; Breese, J. 1974. Accelerated Curing of Compacted Calcium silicate Mortars on Exposure to CO.sub.2. Journal of the American Ceramic Society 57(9), 394-397. [0066] Bukowski, J. M.; Berger, R. L. 1979. Reactivity and Strength Development of CO.sub.2 Activated Non-Hydraulic Calcium Silicates. Cement and Concrete Research 9(1), 57-68.