Rebound device to facilitate hockey training

Abstract

An illustrative example embodiment of a rebound device includes a rigid base that has end faces that establish a width of the base and side faces between the end faces. The side faces establish a base length. The length of the base is greater than its width. A resilient member has a first side surface secured to at least one of the side faces of the base. The resilient member has a thickness in a direction parallel to the width of the base between the first side and a second side of the resilient member that faces in an opposite direction from the first side. The second side of the resilient member presents a rebound surface for resiliently deflecting an object away from the resilient member.

Claims

1. An ice hockey puck rebound device, comprising: a rigid base including end faces that establish a base width, the rigid base including side faces between the end faces, the side faces establishing a base length that is greater than the width, the side faces of the base having a height that is less than the length, the end faces each comprising a solid plate spanning the width and the height, the plates on the end faces including bottom edges defining a plurality of teeth projecting from the plates in a direction to engage an ice surface when the rebound device is placed on the ice surface; and at least one resilient member having a first surface secured to at least one of the side faces of the base, the resilient member has a thickness in a direction parallel to the base width between the first surface and a second surface facing in an opposite direction from the first surface, the resilient member being received against and supported by the side face of the base along an entire length of the resilient member, the resilient member comprising a rubber material and having a durometer between 50 and 60, the second surface presenting a rebound surface for being contacted by an ice hockey puck, the resilient member consistently resiliently deflecting the ice hockey puck away from the resilient member.

2. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the resilient member has a height that is less than the height of the side faces.

3. The rebound device of claim 2, wherein the resilient member has a thickness that is at least one-third of the base width.

4. The rebound device of claim 3, wherein the resilient member thickness is about 1.5 inches.

5. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the durometer is about 55.

6. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the resilient member is adhesively secured to the at least one side face.

7. The rebound device of claim 1, comprising a second resilient member on another side of the base that faces in an opposite direction from the one side face.

8. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the base comprises powder coated steel.

9. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the base length is about seven times larger than the base width.

10. The rebound device of claim 1, wherein the base length is about fifteen times larger than the base width.

11. An ice hockey puck rebound device, comprising: a rigid base including end faces that establish a base width, the rigid base including side faces between the end faces, the side faces establishing a base length that is greater than the width, the side faces of the base having a height that is less than the length, the end faces each comprising a solid surface spanning the width and the height; a rigid handle secured to the base, the handle extending in a direction parallel to the base length, the handle being spaced from a top face of the base; at least one resilient member comprising a rubber material having a durometer between 50 and 60, the resilient member having a first surface secured to at least one of the side faces of the base, the resilient member being received against and supported by the side face of the base along an entire length of the resilient member, the resilient member has a thickness in a direction parallel to the base width between the first surface and a second surface facing in an opposite direction from the first surface, the second surface presenting a rebound surface for being contacted by an ice hockey puck, the resilient member consistently resiliently deflecting a-the ice hockey puck away from the resilient member; and a solid plate on each end face and wherein the solid plates respectively span the width and the height of the base, and a bottom surface of each solid plate defines a plurality of teeth extending from the solid plates in a direction to engage an ice surface when the rebound device is placed on the ice surface.

12. The rebound device of claim 11, wherein the durometer is 55.

13. The rebound device of claim 11, wherein the thickness of the resilient member is at least one-third the base width.

14. The rebound device of claim 11, comprising a second resilient member on another side of the base that faces in an opposite direction from the one side face.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a perspective illustration of a rebound device designed according to an embodiment of this invention.

(2) FIG. 2 is a side, elevational view of the device shown in FIG. 1.

(3) FIG. 3 is a top elevational view of the device of FIG. 1.

(4) FIG. 4 is a bottom elevational view of the device of FIG. 1.

(5) FIG. 5 is an end view of the device of FIG. 1.

(6) FIG. 6 is a cross-sectional view taken along the lines 6-6 in FIG. 2.

(7) FIG. 7 schematically illustrates an example use of the device of FIG. 1.

(8) FIG. 8 is a flowchart diagram summarizing an example approach for making a rebound device designed according to an embodiment of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(9) FIG. 1 shows a rebound device 20 designed according to an embodiment of this invention and that is useful as a practice or training aid for hockey. The rebound device 20 includes a rigid base 22 that is made of metal. In this example, the base 22 comprises a steel tube having a rectangular cross-section as can be appreciated in FIG. 6. The base 22 includes end faces 26 that establish or define a width W as can best be appreciated in FIGS. 5 and 6. Side faces 28 extend between the end faces 26. The side faces 28 establish or define a length L of the device 20 as can best be appreciated from FIGS. 2-4. A top face 30 and a bottom face 32 (FIG. 4) have the same length L in this example. The length L is greater than the width W.

(10) The device 20 includes at least one resilient member 40 that is secured to a side face 28 of the base 22. The illustrated example includes a resilient member 40 on each of the side faces 28. The resilient members 40 have a thickness T in a direction parallel to the width W as visible in FIGS. 5 and 6. The thickness T is less than the width W in this example embodiment. A first side 42 of the resilient members faces toward and is secured to a corresponding side face 28 of the base 22. A second side 44 of the resilient member faces in an opposite direction from the first side 42. The thickness T is a dimension between the first side 42 and the second side 44.

(11) The second side 44 presents a rebound surface for resiliently deflecting an object away from the device 20. FIG. 7 schematically illustrates an example use of the device 20 for a hockey training drill in which a player directs a hockey puck 50 toward the second side 44 of a resilient member 40. After the puck rebounds off the resilient member 40, the same player (or another player) receives the puck 50. The schematically illustrated drill may be a part of a passing drill or a training session that includes simulating a give and go passing situation during a hockey game.

(12) As can be appreciated from FIGS. 1-4, the resilient members 40 have a length that corresponds to the length L of the base. The resilient member 40 is secured to and supported by the side face 28 of the base 22 along the entire length of the resilient member 40 in the illustrated example. This feature provides a solid backing to the entire resilient member and provides a stable, consistent placement of the resilient member in a selected position on the ice or floor surface. Having the entire length of the resilient member supported in this way ensures a consistent amount of snap back effect when a puck (or another object) strikes and rebounds from the second side 44 of the resilient member 40 regardless of where the puck contacts the resilient member 40. This feature of the illustrated example is a significant improvement over devices that rely upon rubber bands or straps for deflecting or rebounding a puck as such devices cannot provide a consistent or reliable rebound effect.

(13) The resilient members 40 in the illustrated embodiment comprise a rubber-based material. Natural rubber or gum rubber is used for some embodiments. A durometer of approximately 55 provides a desirable rebound effect. Durometers between 48 and 60 are useful. Depending on the selected material, a resilient member 40 having a durometer of 45 or less may be too soft and may not provide a sufficient snap-back effect when a puck rebounds off the resilient member. Additionally, a softer resilient member may tend to break down too quickly especially with regular or continuous use. A durometer over 60 tends to leave the resilient members 40 too rigid so that a desired rebound effect is not easily or consistently achieved. In an example embodiment, the material chosen for the resilient members comprises a commercially available rubber having a 55 durometer rating. Some commercially available rubber materials having a 55 durometer rating tend to have an actual durometer between 50 and 60.

(14) The resilient members 40 also have a first height H1 that is less than a second height H2 of the side faces 28 as shown in FIG. 6. In one example embodiment, the width W and second height H2 of the base 22 are four inches, the thickness T is one-and-one-half inches and the first height H1 is two inches. In some examples, the length L is sixty inches and in others the length L is thirty or thirty-six inches. Longer length devices are typically useful for teams or facility use while shorter lengths tend to be useful for individual consumer or home-based training.

(15) One feature of the illustrated embodiment is that the end faces 26 include a plurality of teeth 54 that resist movement of the base 22 relative to the ice surface upon which the device 20 is placed. The teeth 54 in this example include some oriented at a first oblique angle relative to the width dimension of the base 22 and others at a second, different oblique angle relative to the width dimension. Differently oriented teeth facilitate a stable placement of the device 20 on the ice. The teeth 54 and the mass of the device 20 are effective at keeping the device 20 in a desired position and orientation on the ice throughout most drills for many different skill levels of play.

(16) Another embodiment does not include teeth on the underside of the base 22. Instead, a plurality of rubber or polymer pads are secured to the bottom 32 of the base 22. The pads resist movement of the device along a floor surface to maintain a desired placement of the device 20. Such pads can also protect a floor surface against damage that otherwise might result from contact with the metal base 22.

(17) Another feature of the example embodiment is that the end faces 26 each include at least one opening 56 (best seen in FIGS. 1 and 5) that allows for ventilation of the interior of the device 20. The openings 56 prevent a build up of condensation within the device 20 and prevent corrosion by allowing for evaporation of any moisture from within the base 22. This feature tends to increase the durability and longevity of the device.

(18) The illustrated device 20 also includes a handle 58 that is secured to the top face 30. The handle 58 facilitates carrying the device 20 to a desired location and placing it in a selected orientation on the ice.

(19) FIG. 8 is a flowchart diagram 60 summarizing an example method of making a rebound device, such as the illustrated example embodiment. At 62, the base 22 is powder coated with a coating having a desired color. Powder coatings are useful to maintain a desired appearance of the device and to avoid corrosion of the metal of the device 20. At 64, at least a portion of the powder coating on at least one of the side faces is roughened using an abrasive tool or pad, such as sandpaper. The roughening prepares an area on the side face where a resilient member 40 will be secured. If both side faces 28 will support a resilient member 40, then at least a lower portion of both side faces 28 is roughened at 64.

(20) An adhesive enhancer is applied to the roughened portion(s) at 66. After the adhesive enhancer is applied, it is roughened at 68 to at least slightly roughen the outer layer or outer surface of the enhancer without removing all of the enhancer. At 70, adhesive is applied to at least one of the prepared portion of the side face(s) 28 and the first side(s) 42 of a resilient member 40. The final step represented at 72 in FIG. 8 includes adhesively securing the resilient member(s) 40 to the side face(s) 28 by pressing or holding the resilient member(s) 40 against the side face(s) 28 until the adhesive is cured.

(21) The adhesive in one example embodiment comprises a urethane two-part epoxy adhesive. One such adhesive is known as Lord 7542 Urethane Adhesive and is commercially available from Lord Corporation. The adhesive enhancer in one example is a pretreat rubber adhesive enhancer available from Lord Corporation.

(22) The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed example may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.