Pneumatic tire
10730351 ยท 2020-08-04
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
B60C11/1236
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/033
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2011/0348
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C2011/0016
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/0306
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/0318
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B60C11/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B60C11/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A pneumatic tire includes a center land portion, intermediate land portions, and shoulder land portions, the land portions being partitioned and formed by four main grooves, and a plurality of lug grooves and sipes disposed in the land portions. The lug grooves disposed in the shoulder land portions do not communicate with the second main grooves. The groove area ratio is greater in the center region than in the shoulder regions. The distance (L1) from the tire equator to the center in the tire width direction of the first main groove is 15 to 25% of the distance (L) from the tire equator to the ground contact edge. The distance (L2) from the tire equator to the center in the tire width direction of the second main groove is 50 to 65% of the distance (L) from the tire equator to the ground contact edge.
Claims
1. A pneumatic tire comprising: four main grooves extending in a tire circumferential direction on a tread surface, the four main grooves including a pair of first main grooves disposed on either side in a tire width direction of a tire equator and a pair of second main grooves disposed on an outer side in the tire width direction of the first main grooves; five land portions partitioned and formed by the first main grooves and the second main grooves, the five land portions including a single center land portion disposed between the pair of first main grooves, a pair of intermediate land portions disposed between the first main grooves and the second main grooves, and a pair of shoulder land portions disposed on an outer side in the tire width direction of the second main grooves, each shoulder land portion of the pair of shoulder land portions comprises a rib and the rib is divided only by sipes, a plurality of lug grooves extending in the tire width direction; and a plurality of sipes extending in the tire width direction, the plurality of lug grooves and the plurality of sipes being formed in the five land portions, wherein of the plurality of lug grooves, shoulder lug grooves formed in the shoulder land portions do not communicate with the second main grooves, a groove area ratio Vc of a center region on a tire equator side of the second main grooves obtained as a ratio of a sum total of a groove area of the lug grooves and the sipes included in the center land portion and the intermediate land portions to an area of the center land portion and the intermediate land portions, and a groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions between the second main grooves and ground contact edges obtained as a ratio of a sum total of a groove area of the lug grooves and the sipes included in the shoulder land portions to an area of the shoulder land portions satisfy a relationship Vc>Vs, a distance from the tire equator to a center in the tire width direction of the first main grooves is set in a range from 15 to 25% of a distance from the tire equator to the ground contact edge, and a distance from the tire equator to a center in the tire width direction of the second main grooves is set in a range from 50 to 65% of the distance from the tire equator to the ground contact edge.
2. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the shoulder land portions include an auxiliary groove extending in the tire circumferential direction, having a groove width from 10 to 25% of a groove width of the second main groove.
3. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a ratio Vc/Vs of the groove area ratio Vc of the center region and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions satisfies a relationship 1.03<Vc/Vs<1.10.
4. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a plurality of point heights are disposed intermittently in a groove side wall on the tire equator side of the second main grooves, forming portions where a block width is relatively small and portions where the block width is relatively large in blocks from which the intermediate land portions are configured, and a length in the circumferential direction of the portions where the block width is relatively large is greater than a length in the circumferential direction of the portions where the block width is relatively small.
5. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein a tread pattern formed on a surface of the tread portion has a pitch arrangement that includes two or more pitch lengths, and a maximum/minimum pitch length ratio in the pitch arrangement is in a range from 1.25 to 1.40.
6. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the tread portion is configured from two or more rubber layers laminated in a tire radial direction, a JIS hardness of rubber from which a rubber layer on an outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is from 60 to 70, the JIS hardness of rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is less than a JIS hardness of rubber from which a rubber layer on an innermost side in the tire radial direction is configured, and the hardness difference is from 10 to 15.
7. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein when the tread portion is configured from two or more rubber layers laminated in the tire radial direction, a brittle temperature of the rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is 45 C. or lower.
8. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, the center land portion extends from one of the first main grooves to another of the first main grooves.
9. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein each of the intermediate land portions extends from one of the first main grooves to one of the second main grooves.
10. The pneumatic tire according to claim 1, wherein the center land portion is configured as a single rib continuous in the tire circumferential direction, and the intermediate land portions are configured as rows of blocks in which a plurality of blocks are arranged in the tire circumferential direction.
11. The pneumatic tire according to claim 10, wherein the shoulder land portions include an auxiliary groove extending in the tire circumferential direction, having a groove width from 10 to 25% of a groove width of the second main groove.
12. The pneumatic tire according to claim 11, wherein a ratio Vc/Vs of the groove area ratio Vc of the center region and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions satisfies a relationship 1.03<Vc/Vs<1.10.
13. The pneumatic tire according to claim 12, wherein a plurality of point heights are disposed intermittently in a groove side wall on the tire equator side of the second main grooves, forming portions where a block width is relatively small and portions where the block width is relatively large in blocks from which the intermediate land portions are configured, and a length in the circumferential direction of the portions where the block width is relatively large is greater than a length in the circumferential direction of the portions where the block width is relatively small.
14. The pneumatic tire according to claim 13, wherein a tread pattern formed on a surface of the tread portion has a pitch arrangement that includes two or more pitch lengths, and a maximum/minimum pitch length ratio in the pitch arrangement is in a range from 1.25 to 1.40.
15. The pneumatic tire according to claim 14, wherein the tread portion is configured from two or more rubber layers laminated in a tire radial direction, a JIS hardness of rubber from which a rubber layer on an outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is from 60 to 70, the JIS hardness of rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is less than a JIS hardness of rubber from which a rubber layer on an innermost side in the tire radial direction is configured, and the hardness difference is from 10 to 15.
16. The pneumatic tire according to claim 15, wherein when the tread portion is configured from two or more rubber layers laminated in the tire radial direction, a brittle temperature of the rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is 45 C. or lower.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(6) A configuration of the present technology will be described below in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings.
(7) The reference sign CL in
(8) The present technology is applied to such a general pneumatic tire, however, the cross-sectional structure thereof is not limited to the basic structure described above.
(9) As illustrated in
(10) In the present technology, the arrangement of the main grooves 11, 12 in the tire width direction is limited to predetermined ranges. Specifically, the distance L1 from the tire equator CL to the center in the tire width direction of the first main groove 11 is from 15 to 25% of the distance L from the tire equator CL to the ground contact edge E, and is preferably set in the range of 17 to 21%. Also, the distance L2 from the tire equator CL to the center in the tire width direction of the second main groove 12 is from 50 to 65% of the distance L from the tire equator CL to the ground contact edge E, and is preferably set in the range of 53 to 60%.
(11) Five land portions 13 are partitioned and formed on the tread surface 10 by these main grooves 11, 12. Specifically, one center land portion 13C is partitioned and formed between the pair of first main grooves 11, a pair of intermediate land portions 13M is partitioned and formed between the first main grooves 11 and the second main grooves 12, and a pair of shoulder land portions 13S is partitioned and formed on the outer side in the tire width direction of the second main grooves 12.
(12) A plurality of lug grooves 14 extending in the tire width direction and a plurality of sipes 15 extending in the tire width direction are formed in these five land portions 13 (one center land portion 13C, two intermediate land portions 13M, and two shoulder land portions 13S) (Hereafter the lug grooves disposed in the center land portion 13C are indicated as 14C, the lug grooves disposed in the intermediate land portions 13M are indicated as 14M or 14m, and the lug grooves disposed in the shoulder land portions 13S are indicated as 14S or 14s. Also the sipes disposed in the center land portion 13C are indicated as 15C, the sipes disposed in the intermediate land portions 13M are indicated as 15M, and the sipes disposed in the shoulder land portions 13 S are indicated as 15S). The groove width of the lug grooves 14 is, for example, from 1.5 to 7.0 mm, and the groove depth is, for example, from 3.0 to 7.5 mm. In particular, the groove width of the lug grooves 14S, 14s disposed in the shoulder land portions 13S is, for example, from 10 to 25% of the groove width of the second main grooves 12. The groove width and groove depth of the sipes 15 are smaller than those of the lug grooves 14, the groove width is for example from 0.6 to 1 mm, and the groove depth is from 50 to 60% of the groove depth of the main grooves 11, 12, so even if the sipes 15 traverse the land portions 13, the land portions 13 are not substantially divided.
(13) In the example of
(14) In the example in
(15) In the example in
(16) Note that in the example in
(17) In the tread pattern configured in this way, when the region on the tire equator CL side of the second grooves 12 is referred to as the center region Ce, and the regions between the second grooves 12 and the ground contact edges E are referred to as the shoulder regions Sh, the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce is set larger than the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions Sh. In other words, the relationship between the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions Vs satisfies Vc>Vs. Note that the groove area ratio is the ratio of the sum total of the groove areas of the lug grooves 14 and the sipes 15 included in each land portion to the area of the land portions included in each region. Specifically, the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce is the ratio of the sum total of the groove areas of the lug grooves 14C, 14M, and 14m and the sipes 15C, 15M included in the center land portion 13C and the intermediate land portions 13M to the area of the center land portion 13C and the intermediate land portions 13M included in the center region Ce. Also the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder region Sh is the ratio of the sum total of the groove area of the lug grooves 14S, 14s and the sipes 15S included in the shoulder land portion 13S to the area of the shoulder land portion 13S included in the shoulder region Sh. When the groove width of the main groove (second main groove 12) varies periodically as illustrated in
(18) In the present technology, by configuring the tread pattern as described above, the steering stability performance on dry road surfaces (dry performance), the traveling performance on icy and snowy road surfaces (snow performance), and the noise performance can all be achieved. In other words, as described above, by making the shoulder lug grooves 14S, 14s not communicate with the second main grooves 12, pattern noise is not dissipated to the outside of the vehicle through the shoulder lug grooves 14S, 14s, so the noise performance can be improved. Also, the shoulder land portions 13S are not divided by the lug grooves 14S, 14s, so the stiffness of the shoulder land portions 13S are increased and the dry performance can be improved. On the other hand, when traveling, the groove area ratio of the center region Ce that contacts the ground surface is greater than that of the shoulder regions Sh, so the snow performance can be improved. Also, the first main grooves 11 and the second main grooves 12 are arranged in the ranges as described above, and in particular, the second main grooves 12 are arranged closer to the tire equator CL than conventionally, so the noise performance is improved by reducing the degradation of pattern noise, and the dry performance can be improved.
(19) In this case, if the first main grooves 11 are arranged closer to the tire equator CL than the range described above, the width of the center land portion 13C is too narrow, sufficient stiffness of the center land portion 13C cannot be ensured, and the dry performance deteriorates. If the first main grooves 11 are arranged to the outside in the tire width direction of the range described above, the width of the center land portion 13C becomes too wide, noise radiated from the main grooves increases, and the noise performance deteriorates. If the second main grooves 12 are arranged closer to the tire equator CL than the range described above, the lug groove component is reduced, and the snow performance deteriorates. If the second main grooves 12 are arranged to the outside in the tire width direction of the range described above, noise radiated from the main grooves increases, and the noise performance deteriorates.
(20) The center land portion 13C can be a row of blocks with the blocks arranged in the tire circumferential direction as illustrated in
(21) The lug grooves 14S, 14s and the sipes 15S alone can be disposed in the shoulder land portions 13S as illustrated in
(22) As described above, the relationship between the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions Sh satisfies the relationship Vc>Vs, but preferably the ratio Vc/Vs satisfies the relationship 1.03<Vc/Vs<1.10. By setting the relationship between the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions Sh in this way, the difference in stiffness between the center region Ce and the shoulder regions Sh is prevented from becoming too large, and the dry performance and the snow performance can both be achieved. In this case, if the ratio Vc/Vs is smaller than 1.03, there is almost no difference between the groove area ratio Vc of the center region Ce and the groove area ratio Vs of the shoulder regions Sh, so it is difficult to sufficiently improve the snow performance. When the ratio Vc/Vs is greater than 1.10, the difference in stiffness between the center region Ce and the shoulder regions Sh becomes excessively large, and it becomes difficult to achieve both the dry performance and the snow performance in a balanced manner.
(23) The groove width of the second main grooves 12 may be constant as illustrated in
(24) In the tread pattern configured as described above, the arrangement of the lug grooves 14 in each of the land portions 13 is varied in various ways, so there is a pitch arrangement with two or more pitch lengths. In this case, preferably the ratio of maximum/minimum pitch length of this pitch arrangement is in the range from 1.25 to 1.40. By making the ratio of pitch lengths small in this way, sufficient snow performance can be obtained from the lug grooves 14, and the variation in stiffness of each block is reduced, so the dry performance can be improved. In other words, excellent snow performance and dry performance can both be obtained from all season pneumatic tires that are used throughout the year.
(25) The tread portion 1 can be configured from a single rubber layer, but preferably is configured from two or more rubber layers that are laminated in the tire radial direction. In this case, preferably the JIS hardness of rubber from which the outermost rubber layer in the tire radial direction is configured is from 60 to 70, the JIS hardness of the rubber from which the outermost rubber layer in the tire radial direction is configured is less than the JIS hardness of rubber from which the innermost rubber layer in the tire radial direction is configured, and the difference in hardness is from 10 to 15. This hardness setting is different from the hardness setting of normal winter tires, such as studless tires or the like (JIS hardness of the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is about 50, and less than the JIS hardness of the rubber layer on the innermost side in the tire radial direction, and the hardness difference is 16 or greater), and the hardness setting of normal tires that are not winter tires (JIS hardness of the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is about 60 to 75, but the JIS hardness of the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is greater than the JIS hardness of the rubber layer on the innermost side in the tire radial direction), but this hardness setting achieves a high level of dry performance and snow performance. In other words, excellent performance can be obtained from all season pneumatic tires that are used throughout the year.
(26) When the tread portion is configured from two or more rubber layers laminated in the tire radial direction in this way, preferably the brittle temperature of the rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is 45 C. or lower. By setting the brittle temperature in this way, good snow performance can be obtained. If the brittle temperature of the rubber from which the rubber layer on the outermost side in the tire radial direction is configured is higher than 45 C., the snow performance degrades.
Examples
(27) Twelve pneumatic tires of tire size 225/60R18 were manufactured, having the cross-section illustrated in
(28) Note that the tread pattern of Conventional Example 1 had shoulder lug grooves that communicate with the second main groove in the tread pattern of
(29) These 12 types of pneumatic tires were evaluated for dry performance, snow performance, and noise performance by the evaluation methods described below, and the results are also shown in Table 1.
(30) Dry Performance
(31) The test tires were assembled on wheels with a rim size of 187.5 JJ, inflated to an air pressure of 220 kPa, and mounted on a test vehicle (front wheel drive vehicle) having an engine displacement of 2,500 cc. Sensory evaluations on a dry road surface were carried out by a test driver. Evaluation results were expressed as index values, Conventional Example 1 being assigned an index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior steering stability on dry road surfaces (dry performance).
(32) Snow Performance
(33) The test tires were assembled on wheels with a rim size of 187.5 JJ, inflated to an air pressure of 220 kPa, and mounted on a test vehicle (front wheel drive vehicle) having an engine displacement of 2,500 cc. Sensory evaluations on an icy and snowy road surface were carried out by a test driver. Evaluation results were expressed as index values, Conventional Example 1 being assigned an index value of 100. Larger index values indicate superior traveling performance on icy and snowy road surfaces (snow performance).
(34) Noise Performance
(35) Each test tire was assembled on a wheel having a rim size of 187.5 JJ, inflated to an air pressure of 220 kPa, mounted on a test vehicle (front wheel drive vehicle) of displacement volume 2,500 cc. Pass-by noise was measured in accordance with a measuring method based on the EEC/ECE tire noise regulations, which correspond to the European pass-by noise regulations. The evaluation results were expressed with reference to the measured values for Conventional Example 1, as the difference from the measured value for Conventional Example 1 (dB). The greater the difference (greater negative value) the less the noise relative to Conventional Example 1, and the better the noise performance.
(36) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Conventional Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Tread Pattern FIG. 4 FIG. 4 FIG. 4 Groove area ratio Vc of % 19 20 20 19 center region Groove area ratio Vs of % 19 18 18 19 the shoulder region First main groove % 20 10 30 17 position Second main groove % 70 40 70 55 position Shape of shoulder lug groove Penetrates Does not Does not Does not penetrate penetrate penetrate Shape of center land portion Block Block Block Block Shape of intermediate land Block Block Block Block portion Presence/absence of auxiliary Absence Absence Absence Absence groove Ratio Vc/Vs 1 1.11 1.11 1 Presence/absence of point Absence Absence Absence Absence heights Arrangement of point heights Pitch length ratio 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 Rubber hardness of outside 70 70 70 70 rubber layer Rubber hardness of inside 55 55 55 55 rubber layer Rubber hardness difference 15 15 15 15 Brittle temperature of C. 43 43 43 43 outside rubber layer Dry performance Index 100 97 100 100 value Snow performance Index 100 98 101 98 value Noise performance dB Baseline 0.3 +0.2 0 Working Working Working Working Working Working Working Working Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 Example 8 Tread Pattern FIG. 4 FIG. 5 FIG. 6 FIG. 6 FIG. 2 FIG. 2 FIG. 2 FIG. 2 Groove area ratio Vc of % 20 20 20 19 19 19 19 19 center region Groove area ratio Vs of % 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 18 the shoulder region First main groove % 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 position Second main groove % 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 55 position Shape of shoulder lug groove Does not Does not Does not Does not Does not Does not Does not Does not penetrate penetrate penetrate penetrate penetrate penetrate penetrate penetrate Shape of center land portion Block Rib Rib Rib Rib Rib Rib Rib Shape of intermediate land Block Block Block Block Block Block Block Block portion Presence/absence of auxiliary Absence Absence Presence Presence Presence Presence Presence Presence groove Ratio Vc/Vs 1.11 1.11 1.11 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 1.06 Presence/absence of point Absence Absence Absence Absence Presence Presence Presence Presence heights Arrangement of point heights Second Second Second Second main main main main groove groove groove groove Pitch length ratio 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.35 1.35 1.35 Rubber hardness of outside 70 70 70 70 70 70 64 64 rubber layer Rubber hardness of inside 55 55 55 55 55 55 77 77 rubber layer Rubber hardness difference 15 15 15 15 15 15 13 13 Brittle temperature of C. 43 43 43 43 43 43 43 47 outside rubber layer Dry performance Index 101 102 102 103 103 104 107 107 value Snow performance Index 101 102 103 103 104 104 105 107 value Noise performance dB 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.5 0.5
(37) As can be seen from Table 1, each of Working Examples 1 to 8 had improved dry performance, snow performance, and noise performance compared with Conventional Example 1.
(38) On the other hand, in the case of Comparative Example 1 in which the first main grooves and the second main grooves were shifted towards the center compared with the prescribed ranges, the dry performance and the snow performance were degraded compared with Conventional Example 1. In the case of Comparative Example 2 in which the first main grooves and the second main grooves were shifted towards the outer side in the tire width direction compared with the prescribed ranges, the noise performance was degraded compared with Conventional Example 1. In the case of Comparative Example 3 in which the magnitude relationship between the groove area ratio of the center region and the groove area ratio of the shoulder regions did not satisfy the prescription of the present technology, the snow performance was degraded.