Laser sensor for particle size detection
10732091 ยท 2020-08-04
Assignee
Inventors
- Alexander Marc Van Der Lee (Eindhoven, NL)
- Joachim Wilhelm Hellmig (Eindhoven, NL)
- Johannes Hendrikus Maria Spruit (Eindhoven, NL)
Cpc classification
G01S17/58
PHYSICS
Y02A90/10
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
G01N2015/1454
PHYSICS
G01S7/4802
PHYSICS
G01S17/87
PHYSICS
International classification
G01S17/58
PHYSICS
G01S17/87
PHYSICS
Abstract
The invention describes a laser sensor module (100) for particle size detection. The laser sensor module (100) comprises at least one first laser (110), at least one first detector (120), at least one electrical driver (130) and at least one evaluator (140). The first laser (110) is adapted to emit first laser light in reaction to signals provided by the at least one driver (130). The at least one first detector (120) is adapted to determine a first self-mixing interference signal (30) of an optical wave within a first laser cavity of the first laser (110). The first self-mixing interference signal (30) is caused by first reflected laser light reentering the first laser cavity, the first reflected laser light being reflected by a particle receiving at least a part of the first laser light. The evaluator (140) is adapted to determine a size of the particle by determining a first relative distance between the particle and the first laser (110) by means of the first self-mixing interference signal (30) and by determining a first amplitude information by means of the first self-mixing interference signal (30). The invention is further related to a corresponding method of determining a particle size.
Claims
1. A laser sensor module comprising: at least one first laser; at least one first detector; at least one electrical driver; and at least one evaluator, wherein the first laser is arranged to emit first laser light in reaction to signals provided by the at least one driver, wherein the at least one first detector is arranged to determine a first self-mixing interference signal of an optical wave within a first laser cavity of the first laser, wherein the first self-mixing interference signal is caused by first reflected laser light reentering the first laser cavity, wherein the first reflected laser light is reflected by a particle receiving at least a part of the first laser light, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine a size of the particle by determining a first relative distance between the particle and the first laser using the first self-mixing interference signal and by determining a first amplitude information using the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the laser module further comprises at least one first focus region, wherein the first relative distance is related to a distance between the first focus region and the particle, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine the first relative distance based on at least one characteristic of the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the first self-mixing interference signal is related to the distance between the first focus region and the particle, wherein the first amplitude information comprises a maximum or a minimum amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the at least one characteristic of the first self-mixing interference signal comprises at least one of phase information, number of oscillations, number of relative maxima or minima, ratio of amplitudes of relative maxima minima, number of zero crossings within a defined interval of the first self-mixing interference signal, one or more distances between the zero crossings and shape of an envelope of the first self-mixing interference signal.
2. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, wherein the laser module further comprises at least one first optical device for focusing the first laser light on the first focus region.
3. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine an absolute maximum or minimum of a first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine a first number of relative maxima or minima of the first self-mixing interference signal within a defined range around the absolute maximum or minimum of the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine the first relative distance to the particle using the number of maxima or minima of the first self-mixing interference signal within the defined range, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine the size of the particle using the determined first relative distance to the particle and the absolute maximum or minimum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal.
4. The laser sensor module according to claim 3, wherein the evaluator is arranged to refine the determination of the first relative distance to the particle based on the ratio between the absolute maximum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal and an amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal at at least one of the relative maxima of the first self-mixing interference signal, or based on the ratio between the absolute minimum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal and an amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal at at least one of the relative minima of the first self-mixing interference signal.
5. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, wherein the laser sensor module is arranged to provide a defined velocity distribution of the group of particles comprising the particle relative to the first focus region.
6. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, wherein the electrical driver is arranged to provide a first modulated drive current to the first laser, wherein the evaluator is arranged to determine the first relative distance to the particle based on the first self-mixing interference signal resulting from the first modulated drive current.
7. The laser sensor module according to claim 6, wherein the first modulated drive current comprises at least a first driving scheme and a second driving scheme, wherein the first driving scheme is different from the second driving scheme.
8. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, wherein the laser sensor module further comprises a first movable mirror (170) for redirecting the first laser light, wherein the laser sensor module is arranged to control a movement of the first movable mirror such that detection of the size of particles below a defined size threshold is suppressed.
9. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, further comprising: at least a second laser; and at least a second detector, wherein the second laser is arranged to emit second laser light, wherein the second laser light has a second wavelength being different from a first wavelength of the first laser light, wherein the second detector is arranged to determine a second self-mixing interference signal of an optical wave within a second laser cavity of the second laser, wherein the second self-mixing interference signal is caused by second reflected laser light reentering the second laser cavity, wherein the second reflected laser light is reflected by the particle receiving at least a part of the second laser light, wherein the evaluator is arranged to refine determination of the size of the particle by determining a second relative distance between the particle and the second laser using the second self-mixing interference signal.
10. The laser sensor module according to claim 1, further comprising: at least one first optical device, wherein the first optical device is arranged to focus the first laser light on a first focus region; at least a second laser; at least a second detector; and at least one second optical device, wherein the second optical device is arranged for focusing second laser light emitted by the second laser on a second focus region, wherein the second detector is arranged to determine a second self-mixing interference signal of an optical wave within a second laser cavity of the second laser, wherein the second self-mixing interference signal is caused by second reflected second laser light reentering the second laser cavity, wherein the second reflected laser light is reflected by the particle receiving at least a part of the second laser light, wherein the evaluator is arranged to refine determination of the size of the particle by determining a second relative distance between the particle and the second laser using the second self-mixing interference signal.
11. The laser sensor module according to claim 10, wherein a first size of the first focus region is different than a second size of the second focus region.
12. A mobile communication device comprising a particle detector, the particle detector comprising at least one laser sensor module according to claim 1.
13. A method of particle size detection for determining an air quality, the method comprising the steps of: emitting a first laser light using a first laser, wherein the first laser light illuminates to at least one first focus region, receiving first reflected laser light in a first laser cavity of the first laser, wherein the first reflected laser light is reflected by a particle receiving at least a part of the first laser light, determining a first self-mixing interference signal of an optical wave within the first laser cavity of the first laser, wherein the first self-mixing interference signal is caused by the first reflected laser light reentering the first laser cavity, determining a size of the particle by determining a first relative distance between the particle and the first laser using the first self-mixing interference signal and by determining a first amplitude information using the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the first relative distance is related to a distance between the first focus region and the particle, determining the first relative distance based on at least one characteristic of the first self-mixing interference signal, wherein the first self-mixing interference signal is related to the distance between the first focus region and the particle, wherein the first amplitude information comprises a maximum or minimum amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal, and wherein the at least one characteristic of the first self-mixing interference signal is related to the distance between the first focus region and the particle comprises at least one of phase information, number of oscillations, number of relative maxima or minima, ratio of amplitudes of relative maxima minima, number of zero crossings within a defined interval of the first self-mixing interference signal, one or more distances between the zero crossings and shape of an envelope of the first self-mixing interference signal.
14. A computer program product comprising code, wherein the code is arranged such that the method according to claim 13 can be executed using a processing circuit.
15. The method according to claim 13, wherein the method further comprises focusing the first laser light on the first focus region.
16. The method according to claim 13 further comprising: determining an absolute maximum or minimum of a first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal; determining a first number of relative maxima or minima of the first self-mixing interference signal within a defined range around the absolute maximum or minimum of the first self-mixing interference signal; determining the first relative distance to the particle using the number of maxima or minima of the first self-mixing interference signal within the defined range; determining the size of the particle using the determined first relative distance to the particle and the absolute maximum or minimum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal.
17. The method according to claim 16 further comprising refining the determination of the first relative distance to the particle based on the ratio between the absolute maximum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal and an amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal at at least one of the relative maxima of the first self-mixing interference signal, or based on the ratio between the absolute minimum of the first signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal and an amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal at least one of the relative minima of the first self-mixing interference signal.
18. The method according to claim 13 further comprising, providing a defined velocity distribution of the group of particles comprising the particle relative to the first focus region.
19. The method according to claim 13 further comprising: providing a first modulated drive current to the first laser; and determining the first relative distance to the particle based on the first self-mixing interference signal resulting from the first modulated drive current.
20. The method according to claim 19, wherein the modulated first drive current comprises at least a first driving scheme and a second driving scheme, wherein the first driving scheme is different from the second driving scheme.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) These and other aspects of the invention will be apparent from and elucidated with reference to the embodiments described hereinafter.
(2) The invention will now be described, by way of example, based on embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings.
(3) In the drawings:
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15) In the Figures, like numbers refer to like objects throughout. Objects in the Figures are not necessarily drawn to scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(16) Various embodiments of the invention will now be described by means of the Figures.
(17) Self-mixing interference is used for detecting movement of and distance to an object. Background information about self-mixing interference is described in Laser diode self-mixing technique for sensing applications, Giuliani, G.; Norgia, M.; Donati, S. & Bosch, T., Laser diode self-mixing technique for sensing applications, Journal of Optics A: Pure and Applied Optics, 2002, 4, S. 283-S. 294 which is incorporated by reference. Detection of movement of a fingertip relative to a sensor in an optical input device is described in detail in International Patent Application No. WO 02/37410. The disclosure regarding the detection of distance and movement in International Patent Application No. WO 02/37410 is incorporated by reference.
(18) The principle of self-mixing interference is discussed based on the examples presented in International Patent Application No. WO 02/37410. A diode laser having a laser cavity is provided for emitting a laser, or measuring, beam. At its upper side, the device is provided with a transparent window across which an object, for example a human finger, is moved. A lens, for example, a plano-convex lens is arranged between the diode laser and the window. This lens focuses the laser beam at or near the upper side of the transparent window. If an object is present at this position, it scatters the measuring beam. A part of the radiation of the measuring beam is scattered in the direction of the illumination beam and this part is converged by the lens on the emitting surface of the laser diode and re-enters the cavity of this laser. The radiation re-entering the cavity of the diode laser induces a variation in the gain of the laser and thus in the intensity of radiation emitted by the laser, and it is this phenomenon which is termed the self-mixing effect in a diode laser.
(19) The change in intensity of the radiation emitted by the laser can be detected by a photo diode, provided for this purpose, which diode converts the radiation variation into an electric signal, and electronic circuitry is provided for processing this electric signal.
(20) Movement of the object relative to the measuring beam causes the radiation reflected thereby to undergo a Doppler shift. This means that the frequency of this radiation changes or that a frequency shift occurs. This frequency shift is dependent on the velocity with which the object moves and is of the order of a few kHz to MHz. The frequency-shifted radiation re-entering the laser cavity interferes with the optical wave, or radiation generated in this cavity, i.e. a self-mixing effect occurs in this cavity. Dependent on the amount of phase shift between the optical wave and the radiation re-entering the cavity, the interference will be constructive or negative, i.e. the intensity of the laser radiation is increased or decreased periodically. The frequency of the laser radiation modulation generated in this way is exactly equal to the difference between the frequency of the optical wave in the cavity and that of the Doppler-shifted radiation re-entering the cavity. The frequency difference is of the order of a few kHz to MHz and thus easy to detect. The combination of the self-mixing effect and the Doppler shift causes a variation in behavior of the laser cavity; especially its gain or light amplification varies. The impedance of the laser cavity or the intensity of the radiation emitted by the laser may, for example, be measured, and not only can the amount of movement of the object relative to the sensor (i.e. distance traveled) be evaluated, but the direction of movement can also be determined, as described in detail in International Patent Application No. WO 02/37410.
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24) The first optical device 150 may for example comprises only one lens with the defined diameter rlens. The first self-mixing interference signal 30 scales as (1-exp[(rlens/wpupil){circumflex over ()}2]){circumflex over ()}2, wherein wpupil is the waist parameter of a Gaussian beam of the first laser light at the lens pupil. The lens should have a certain minimal diameter in order to avoid signal loss due to vignetting of the backscattered or reflected beam of first laser light. A favorable embodiment would have a lens diameter>1.1 pupil diameter (this corresponds to 3 dB signal loss). Even better would be a lens>1.5 pupil diameter of the Gaussian beam (1 dB signal loss).
(25) Details about the theoretical background about the determination of the size of the particle are described in the following paragraphs.
(26) The change in power within the first laser cavity of the first laser 110 due to the back scattered or reflected first laser light from a particle can be given by the following formula.
(27)
(28) Delta P/P is the relative power change of the laser intensity of the optical wave within the first laser cavity due to the backscattered light from the particle, E_(laser)(x,y,z) is the laser field at the position of the particle, IE_bsl is related to backscattered light from the particle in backward direction, is the wavelength, k is 2/, is the resulting phase between the backscattered light and the optical wave in the first laser cavity. This phase can depend non-linearly on the amplitude of the backscattered signal.
(29) IE_bsl is given by the following formula,
(30)
(31) Here d sigma/d Omega is the scattering cross section of the beam of the first laser light for the backward direction. (It is here assumed constant within the acceptance angle of the laser beam).
(32) The total expression for the signal strength becomes
(33)
(34) The first part of the equation describes the amplitude of the signal and the last term its phase.
(35) This phase is determined by the distance from the first laser 110 to the particle, and on the phase of the incident laser beam of first laser light, as is well known in interferometers. For a laser sensor module 100 using self-mixing interference with a scanning spot or moving particle in the transverse direction, especially the dependence on the transversal components of the field, x, y is interesting. For a Gaussian beam of first laser light it is given by the following equation.
(36)
(37) The phase at z=constant plane, is determined by the amount of defocus of the beam of first laser light which can be parametrized by R(z).
(38)
(39) The amplitude of the beam in a constant z plane is a Gaussian determined by its beam waist, parameterized by w(z).
(40)
(41) With z_r the Rayleigh range,
(42)
(43) The first part of the Gaussian beam gives the amplitude dependence and the part in the complex exponential the phase profile of the beam.
(44) This Gaussian beam profile can be inserted into the equation for the laser power (also other laser beam profiles can be inserted). This leads to
(45)
(46) Some words on the phase term one could say that the relative z movement of particle and laser corresponds to Doppler phase shift and x,y relative movement to defocus phase shift.
(47) When the particle trajectory with respect to the focus is known this equation describes the observed intensity oscillation of the laser. The basic unknown is
(48)
which depends on the size of particle (and its dielectric properties, however generally optical particle counters assume that the scatter cross-section
(49)
correlates to particle size and assume that the dielectric properties of the different particles are the same), when all other parameters are known the back scatter cross section can be determined from the measurement signal.
(50) Movement of the particles may be either small or predetermined particle trajectory may be provided. One option would be to use a controlled airflow. Another option is to use a scanning spot, for instance by a MEMs mirror as described in
(51) In the case the particle and the laser spot have well defined transversal relative velocity and the z dependence can be neglected, either by a scanning mirror which displaces the laser spot, or by a controlled air flow which displaces the particle, the phase of the backscattered light will vary due to the defocus term. This phase variation leads to oscillation of the first self-mixing interference signal 30. Apart from this phase variation also the amplitude of the beam decreases leading to a lower signal of the particle signal. As the particle goes out of focus the phase oscillating term becomes larger compared to the transversal decay (z_R is Rayleigh range).
(52)
(53) This means that out of focus more oscillations of the particle signal are present before the first self-mixing interference signal 30 decays below the noise level. So from the amount of oscillations as function of the decay of the signal the position of the particle could be determined. The maximum signal amplitude decays as out of focus the maximal intensity of the laser beam is lower.
(54) The important point is that considering the amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal 30 and, for example, the amount of oscillation periods and their frequency, the distance from focus can be determined and with that information and the maximum amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal 30 the particle size. Alternatively or in addition, the zero crossings of the first self-mixing interference signal 30 and the distance between the zero crossings may be used. Furthermore, an envelope of the first self-mixing interference signal 30 may be modelled and the distance may be determined by means of the maximum and/or minimum of the envelope and the decay of the envelope as long as the envelope is above the noise level of the first self-mixing interference signal 30.
(55)
(56) The particle signal amplitude of the first self-mixing interference signal 30 is an interplay between the numerical aperture of the focused spot (or beam waist of the Gaussian beam) and the mirror movement of movable mirror 170. First the minimal particle size to be detected should be determined. This poses a limit to the maximal noise power that after filtering can be present in the first self-mixing interference signal 30. As discussed above the relative velocity of spot and particle determines the frequency bandwidth of signal. When the velocity is low the sampled air volume is low, an increase in velocity leads to more sampled volume and hence to more detected particles. The SNR also decreases for larger velocity, but this is unimportant as long as the smallest desired particle is still detectable. The shape of the laser beam also has influence on the sampled air volume; a Gaussian beam with a large waist has a larger diameter and Rayleigh range, yielding more Cross-sectional area than a beam with a small waist (higher numerical aperture). A larger waist also means lower scattered signal as local intensity is lower. This means that a trade of exist between the numerical aperture of the lens used to focus the beam and the relative speed.
(57) In case the air movement is not controlled, and a scanning mirror is used to displace the spot. It may be favorable to choose the velocity higher than normal air speed velocities, 0.1 to 1 m/s. So it would be convenient to have a value of 5-20 m/s. In that case a value of the numerical aperture of the focusing lens of between 0.05-0.2 would be optimal, when particles above 300 nm should be detectable. (numerical aperture is defined using the 1/e{circumflex over ()}2 intensity value of the Gaussian beam's far field angular extend).
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
(64) It is a basic idea of the present invention to use distance and amplitude information of self-mixing interference signals to determine a size of the particle. Especially the shape of the self-mixing interference signal within a defined period around a maximum or minimum of the self-mixing interference signal provides information which can be used to determine particle size.
(65) While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and the foregoing description, such illustration and description are to be considered illustrative or exemplary and not restrictive.
(66) From reading the present disclosure, other modifications will be apparent to persons skilled in the art. Such modifications may involve other features which are already known in the art and which may be used instead of or in addition to features already described herein.
(67) Variations to the disclosed embodiments can be understood and effected by those skilled in the art, from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims. In the claims, the word comprising does not exclude other elements or steps, and the indefinite article a or an does not exclude a plurality of elements or steps. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
(68) Any reference signs in the claims should not be construed as limiting the scope thereof.
LIST OF REFERENCE NUMERALS
(69) 10 amplitude axis 20 time axis 30 first self-mixing interference signal 40 amplitude reference 100 laser sensor module 110 first laser 111 second laser 120 first detector 121 second detector 130 electrical driver 140 evaluator 150 first optical device 155 first focus region 156 second optical device 158 second focus region 160 controller 170 movable mirror 175 scanning direction 190 mobile communication device 191 user interface 192 main processing device 193 main memory device 210 step of emitting first laser light 220 step of receiving first reflected laser light 230 step of determining a first self-mixing interference signal 240 determining size of the particle