Light field image projection method
11709295 · 2023-07-25
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G02B27/18
PHYSICS
H04N13/307
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
A direct projection light field display comprising an array of projectors for direct projection of a light field. The overall design and incorporation of additional optics achieve the optimal light distribution and small pixel size to produce a high definition, 3D display. The architecture of the direct projection light field display has low a brightness requirement for each projector, resulting in an increased projector density, decreased system, and a decreased power requirement, while producing a high-definition light field.
Claims
1. A method for projecting a light field image comprising: aligning each of a plurality of light field projectors in a projector array with an adjustment element; receiving image data to the plurality of light field projectors in the projector array; from each of the plurality of light field projectors, transmitting projected light rays to create a light field image, wherein creating the light field image comprises: receiving the projected light rays at a collimating lens array comprising a plurality of collimating lenslets, each lenslet in the collimating lens array aligned with a corresponding light field projector in the projector array, and transmitting a collimated light beam from each lenslet; diffusing the collimated light beam from each lenslet with a diffuser and transmitting diffused, collimated light beams; and receiving the diffused, collimated light beams at a display lens and distributing the light beams according to a plenoptic sampling function; and projecting the light field image.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjustment element is a mechanical device or a piezoelectric device.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the mechanical device is a kinematic mount.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein the piezoelectric device is a piezoelectric transducer.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the light field projectors is placed such that the distance between each light field projector and the collimating lens array creates a collimated light beam from each lenslet equal in size to a single collimating lenslet in the collimating lens array.
6. The method of claim 1, wherein the diffuser diffuses the collimated beams according to a point spread function.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the point spread function reduces resolution bias error by providing proper overlap between light beams.
8. The method of claim 1, wherein the plenoptic sampling function is dependent upon 3D coordinates relative to a viewer location and a direction the light approaches the viewer location.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the diffuser is an engineered diffuser array, a diffuser screen, or an angular diffuser.
10. The method of claim 1, wherein the adjustment element repositions each of the plurality of light field projectors by an adjustment amount.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the adjustment amount is dictated by the dimension of each lenslet in the first lens system.
12. The method of claim 1, wherein the collimating lens array is positioned a throw-distance from the projector array.
13. The method of claim 1, wherein the array of lenslets and the diffuser are a single integrated piece.
14. The method of claim 1, wherein the plurality of light field projectors are pico-projectors.
15. The method of claim 1, wherein the collimated light beam from each lenslet is transmitted normal to the diffuser.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein the projected light rays from each light field projector create a divergent pattern approximately the same size as a single projector.
17. The method of claim 1, wherein the ratio of the projected image size at each collimating array lenslet and the size of the light field projector is about 1:1.
18. The method of claim 1, wherein the display lens is a metasurface or gradient index lens material.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(23) We describe here a multiple-view, autostereoscopic, and high-angular resolution, light field display. The light field display is viewable with both horizontal and vertical parallax.
(24) The concept of an observer-based function based on light in space and time, or plenoptic function was developed to describe visual stimulation perceived by vision systems. The basic variables of the plenoptic function are dependent upon include the 3D coordinates (x, y, z) from which light is being viewed and the direction light approaches this viewing location, described by the angles (θ, ϕ). With wavelength of the light, λ and time of the observation, t, this results in the plenoptic function:
P(x,y,z,θ,ϕ,Δ,t)
(25) Alternative to the plenoptic function, one may use radiance along light rays in 3D space at a point and given direction may be represented by a light field. The definition of light field may be equivalent to that of the plenoptic function. A light field may be described as radiance flowing through all points in all possible directions, as a 5D function. For a static light field, the light field may be represented as a scalar function:
L(x,y,z,θ,ϕ)
(26) Where (x, y, z) represent the radiance as a function of location and the light direction of travel is characterized by (θ, ϕ). A viewer of a 3D real world object is subject to infinite views, or a continuously distributed light field. To practically replicate this, the present disclosure describes a direct projection light field display to subsample the continuously distributed light field into a finite number of views, or multiple views, to approximate the light field. The output of the direct projection light field display is a light field, a 3D representation of a continuously distributed light field based upon a finite number of views with angular resolution exceeding that of the human eye.
(27) Projector array-based displays can be difficult to design, e.g., due to the inclusion of many densely-oriented projectors with precise alignment. Referring to
(28) Generally, very high-brightness projectors are required for light field displays known in the art. An advantage of the light field displays of the present disclosure is the reduced brightness requirement for the projectors in the projector array 12. The decreased brightness requirement is achieved through the design of the direct projection display's lens systems' ability to control the angular distribution of light and application of a point spread function to the light beam. The decreased brightness requirement for the projector array 12 may allow for small LEDs without an internal cooling requirement, therefore a smaller projector footprint may lead to a tighter packing density of the projector array 12, decreased size and weight of the individual projectors, and decreased power requirements for the direct projection light field display.
(29) The first lens subsystem 16, which can be a collimating array, reduces the divergence of light emitted from the projector array 12. The first lens subsystem 16 is positioned a throw-distance from the projector array 12. In one instance, the throw distance is such that each pixel of the projector image increases in size proportional to the adjacent pixel, and results in no overlap in the pixels. The projector is placed such that the distance between the projector and the first lens subsystem 16 creates a projected image equal in size to a single lenslet in the first lens subsystem 16. The divergent pattern from the projector array 12 is approximately the same size as a single projector, allowing a 1:1 ratio between collimating array lenslets of the first lens subsystem 16 and projectors 12.
(30)
(31) At the second lens subsystem 20, the divergence of each pixel is increased by a factor of:
√{square root over (C.sup.2.Math.f.sub.m.sup.2)}
(32) where C is a constant that is chosen for proper reconstruction of the sampled wavefront and f.sub.m is a fill factor. In one example, the value of C is approximately 2. In such instances the fill factor, f.sub.m, is approximately 0.9, such that the spot size, x.sub.s, is related to the pixel spacing, x.sub.p, as
x.sub.s=x.sub.p.Math.√{square root over (C.sup.2.Math.f.sub.m.sup.2)}
(33) where x.sub.p is the lens pitch divided by the number of angular samples. Therefore, the second lens subsystem or diffusing array 20 imparts a point spread function on each pixel in the image.
(34) The pixels with the point spread function from the second lens subsystem or diffusing array 20 are then incident on the back surface of the second lens system 18, which constitutes the display lens. The distance between the second lens system 18 and second lens subsystem 20 will allow for fine tuning of the output width of the pixels per image and may be minimized to reduce system space.
(35) As the light is incident on and passes through the first lens subsystem or engineered diffuser array 20, the light is dispersed according to a point spread function, approximated as a Gaussian function. A second lens subsystem may include an angular diffuser or engineered diffusing array 20 which is used to achieve a desired angle and prevent bleed from the projection of light from neighboring projectors 12. In one instance of the present disclosure, a specific point spread function is applied to the light from each individual projector pixel, directing the pixel to a specific angle. One projector and its pixels can create a small image.
(36) For example, it may be observed that each projector creates an image of 26 mm×15 mm at a distance defined by the throw ratio of the projector. This image may then be projected to a first lens subsystem or collimation lens 16, resulting in a packet image that is that exact size (26 mm×15 mm) projected toward a second lens subsystem consisting of a diffuser screen or engineering diffuser array 20. The second lens subsystem 20 can then create a small, defined point spread function. Using the desired point spread function, proper overlap between pixels is achieved to reduce resolution bias error, or the picket fence effect and distribute the light for a better viewing experience. Resolution bias error references missing information between samples in a spectrum. The reduction of the resolution bias error allows for smooth viewing zone transitions. The second lens subsystem 20 in this instance is designed to a very specific angular output such that if, for example, the engineered divergence has a 5-degree circular FWHM (Full Width Half Maximum), the beam through the lens system will also have an intensity profile of 5 degrees. This output is the light directed to the display lens 18 and which can be a metasurface, gradient index lens material, or any alternate optical structure to distribute light from each pixel according to a plenoptic sampling function as described above.
(37) Each projector 12 may be aligned such that light exiting the first lens system 22 strikes normal to the second lens system 18. As such, each projector 12 may be equipped with alignment hardware and fine control. Depending on the tolerances necessary, there are several approaches to projector 12 alignment:
(38) Adjustment element, i.e., mechanical mounts, with screw adjusters to provide one-time rough alignment.
(39) Piezoelectric Transducers for nano to micro scale electronic adjustment. Potentially useful for active calibration schemes utilizing feedback.
(40) Adjustment elements may include kinematic mounts and/or digitally controlled adjustment elements such as the above-mentioned piezoelectric transducers.
(41) The maximum amount of adjustment is dictated by the dimensions of the lenslets illuminated by each projector 12.
(42)
(43) Each collimating lenslet 24 may be positioned to align with a corresponding projector in the projector array such that each collimating lenslet 24 receives light from its corresponding projector. The first lens subsystem collimating lens array 16 may be coated on one or both sides with an anti-reflective coating.
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47) First, the light is emitted from the projector 12, characterized by a specified throw ratio, where each pixel of the projector image increases in size proportional to the adjacent pixel, resulting in no overlap in the pixels. The projector 12 is placed such that the distance between the projector and the first lens subsystem collimating lens array 16 creates a projected image equal in size to the number of lenslets 18 the projector 12 is illuminating.
(48) Subsequently, at the first lens subsystem 16, the output of the projector is collimated to preserve the projected size of the image. The collimated beam is then incident on the second lens subsystem 20, where the width of the beam is approximately equal on both lens systems 16, 20.
(49) Finally, the pixels with the point spread function 36 from the second lens subsystem 20 are then incident on the back surface of the microlens array, which constitutes the display lens 18. The distance between the display 18 and the second lens subsystem 20 will allow for fine tuning of the output width of the pixels per image.
(50)
(51) In some examples, as shown in
(52)
(53) As used herein, one or more parameters of the light field display comprise one or more of: hogel pitch, a pixel pitch, and focal length. The term pixel references a set of red, green, and blue subpixels. The pixel pitch is defined as the distance from the center of one pixel to the center of the next. As used herein, a pixel array refers to an array of pixels inside a hogel. A hogel is an alternative term for a holographic pixel, which is a cluster of traditional pixels with directional control. An array of hogels can generate a light field. It then follows that the hogel pitch is defined as the distance from the center of one hogel to the center of an adjacent hogel. The angular field of view for a lens is defined by its focal length. Generally, a shorter focal length results in a wider field of view. It should be noted that the focal length is measured from the rear principal plane of a lens. The rear principal plane of lens is rarely located at the mechanical back of an imaging lens. Due to this, approximations and the mechanical design of a system are generally calculated using computer simulation.
(54) A number of embodiments have been described. Nevertheless, it will be understood that various modifications may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. For example, some of the steps described above may be order independent, and thus can be performed in an order different from that described.
(55) Other implementations are also within the scope of the following claims.