CATALYTIC COMPOSITION FOR PREPARING PET RESIN

Abstract

A catalytic composition for preparing a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin is provided. The catalytic composition comprises a polycondensation catalyst and cesium tungsten oxide (Cs.sub.xWO.sub.3-yCl.sub.y), and 0<x≦1 and 0≦y≦0.5. A PET resin prepared by the catalytic composition above is also provided. The PET resin comprises 2-80 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide. This catalytic composition can solve the problems of slow solid-state polymerization rate of the PET preparation and thus the long preparation time, as well as yellowing. Moreover, the PET resin can absorb infrared radiation.

Claims

1. A catalytic composition for preparing a PET resin, comprising: a polycondensation catalyst; and cesium tungsten oxide having a chemical formulation of Cs.sub.xWO.sub.3-yCl.sub.y, wherein 0<x≦1 and 0≦y≦0.5, and a weight ratio of cesium tungsten oxide to the polycondensation catalyst is 0.005-40.

2. The catalytic composition of claim 1, wherein a weight ratio of the cesium tungsten oxide to the PET resin is 2-80 ppm.

3. The catalytic composition of claim 1, wherein the cesium tungsten oxide is in a powder form having a diameter of 2-1000 nm.

4. The catalytic composition of claim 1, wherein the polycondensation catalyst comprises a compound of Ti, Sb or both.

5. The catalytic composition of claim 4, wherein the polycondensation catalyst is tetrabutyl titanate.

6. A polyethylene terephthalate (PET) resin prepared by using the catalytic composition of claim 1, comprising 2-80 ppm cesium tungsten oxide.

7. The PET resin of claim 6, wherein a weight ratio of the cesium tungsten oxide to the polycondensation catalyst is 0.005-40.

8. The PET resin of claim 6, wherein the cesium tungsten oxide is in a powder form having a diameter of 2-1000 nm.

9. The PET resin of claim 7, wherein the polycondensation catalyst comprises a compound of Ti, Sb or both.

10. The PET resin of claim 9, wherein the polycondensation catalyst is tetrabutyl titanate.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0013] The patent or application file contains at least one drawing executed in color. Copies of this patent or patent application publication with color drawings will be provided by the Office upon request and payment of the necessary fee.

[0014] FIG. 1 shows appearances of PET pellets of the examples and the comparative example.

[0015] FIG. 2 is a UV/VIS/IR transmission spectrum of a PET film according to one embodiment of this invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0016] This invention provides a catalytic composition for preparing a PET resin. The catalytic composition comprises a polycondensation catalyst; and cesium tungsten oxide having a chemical formulation of Cs.sub.xWO.sub.3-yCl.sub.y, wherein Cs is cesium, Cl is chlorine, W is tungsten, O is oxygen, 0<x≦1 and 0≦y≦0.5. The polycondensation catalyst comprises a compound of Ti, Sb or both, such as tetrabutyl titanate. The cesium tungsten oxide particle is powder having a diameter of 2-1000 nm, for example. A preferred weight ratio of cesium tungsten oxide to the polycondensation catalyst is 0.005-40.

[0017] In addition, this invention also provides a PET resin prepared by using the catalytic composition above.

[0018] Accordingly, in the PET resin made from the catalytic composition above, the content of the cesium tungsten oxide is 2-80 ppm, relative to the PET resin. This catalytic composition can solve the problems of slow solid-state polymerization rate of the PET preparation and thus the long preparation time, as well as yellowing. Moreover, the PET resin can absorb infrared radiation. Therefore, when the PET resin is applied on bottle blowing process heated by IR, the parison can be softened in a shorter heating time to reduce the process time.

[0019] The embodiments described below can further proof the practical scope of this invention, but it is not intended to limit the scope of this invention in any forms.

[0020] A novel catalytic composition for preparing a PET resin is provided. The catalytic composition comprises a polycondensation catalyst and 2-80 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide, relative to the PET resin. A weight ratio of cesium tungsten oxide to the polycondensation catalyst is 0.005-40. The provided catalytic composition can increase the solid-state polycondensation rate of PET. The obtained PET can absorb IR and improve the yellowing problem.

[0021] In this disclosure, three examples are provided to prepare different PET resin for comparing. The three examples are a comparative example, example 1, and example 2. The titanium catalyst used in the comparative example, example 1 and example 2 was tetrabutyl titanate. The addition amount of the titanium catalyst was 20 ppm, relative to the weight of PET resin. The difference is described below. In addition to tetrabutyl titanate, the catalyst used in example 1 further comprised 10 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide, relative to the weight of the PET resin. In addition to tetrabutyl titanate, the catalyst used in the example 2 further comprised 50 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide, relative to the weight of the PET resin. The rest of the polymerization conditions were the same. For example, the polymerization was performed under vacuum. The torque value of the stirrer for stirring the polymerization product was used to determine the polymerization degree. Generally, the torque value is increased with the increase of the polymerization degree. Therefore, the terminated conditions of the polymerization for the comparative example and the examples were set according to the torque value of the stirrer that reached a fixed value. Then, the solid-state polymerization were conducted.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE

[0022] 400 g of bis-2-hydroxy-ethylterephthalate (BHET) monomer and 20 g of ethylene glycol were weighted and put in a reactor. 0.056 g of tetrabutyl titanate (TBT) catalyst and 0.03 g of phosphoric acid were then added. The addition amount of the titanium was 20 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET. The amount of the phosphoric acid was 24.5 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET. The reaction temperature was 260° C. After reacting for 10 minutes, the pressure was gradually decreased to 60 mmHg for about 30 minutes. The temperature was then increased to 280° C., and the pressure was further decreased to 1 torr (about 1 mmHg). The reaction was continued until the torque value displayed by the stirrer reached a fixed value. Next, the steps of the solid-state polymerization were described below. 50-100 g of polymerized PET product was placed in a furnace under vacuum, and the temperature was increased from room temperature to 215° C. in about 1 hour. The temperature was then kept at 215° C. for 6 hours. Subsequently, the temperature was decreased to room temperature. The inherent viscosity of the product before and after polymerization was measured by Ostwald viscometer.

PREPARATION EXAMPLES

[0023] The preparation of the catalytic composition is as follow. First, the powder of cesium tungsten oxide (from Almighty Green Material Inc., Taiwan) was added into ethylene glycol to prepare an 8.8 wt % solution. Relative to the weight of the powder, 91 wt % of a polymeric type dispersant was then added. 0.5 mm yttrium zirconium beads were used to grind and disperse the mixture above to obtain a nano-disperse liquid. The particle diameter was 91.8 nm measured by a laser particle size analyzer. The dispersion solution and the TBT catalyst (20 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of PET) were mixed according to the needed concentration to prepare the catalytic composition of this invention. The weight ratio of the cesium tungsten oxide and the polycondensation catalyst was 0.005-40.

Example 1

[0024] 400 g of BHET monomer and 20 g of ethylene glycol were weighted and put in a reactor. 0.056 g of TBT catalyst (20 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET), 0.084 g of cesium tungsten oxide dispersion liquid (10 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET), and 0.03 g of phosphoric acid (24.5 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET) were then added. The reaction temperature was 260° C. After reacting for 10 minutes, the pressure was gradually decreased to 60 mmHg for about 30 minutes. The temperature was then increased to 280° C., and the pressure was further decreased to 1 torr (about 1 mmHg). The reaction was continued until the torque value displayed by the stirrer reached a fixed value. Next, the steps of the solid-state polymerization were described below. 50-100 g of polymerized PET product was placed in a furnace under vacuum, and the temperature was increased from room temperature to 215° C. in about 1 hour. The temperature was then kept at 215° C. for 6 hours. Subsequently, the temperature was decreased to room temperature. The inherent viscosity of the product before and after polymerization was measured by Ostwald viscometer.

Example 2

[0025] 400 g of BHET monomer and 20 g of ethylene glycol were weighted and put in a reactor. 0.056 g of TBT catalyst (20 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET), 0.420 g of cesium tungsten oxide dispersion liquid (50 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET), and 0.03 g of phosphoric acid (24.5 ppm, relative to the theoretical weight of the PET) were then added. The reaction temperature was 260° C. After reacting for 10 minutes, the pressure was gradually decreased to 60 mmHg for about 30 minutes. The temperature was then increased to 280° C., and the pressure was further decreased to 1 torr (about 1 mmHg). The reaction was continued until the torque value displayed by the stirrer reached a fixed value. Next, the steps of the solid-state polymerization were described below. 50-100 g of polymerized PET product was placed in a furnace under vacuum, and the temperature was increased from room temperature to 215° C. in about 1 hour. The temperature was then kept at 215° C. for 6 hours. Subsequently, the temperature was decreased to room temperature. The inherent viscosity of the product before and after polymerization was measured by Ostwald viscometer.

[0026] The measuring method of the inherent viscosity refers to the ISO 1628 test standard, “Plastics—Determination of the viscosity of polymers in dilute solution using capillary viscometers.” Here, an Ostwald viscometer was used. The details of the measuring are described to below.

[0027] (1) Sample preparation: Concentration was 0.3 g/dL. 0.0300 g of sample was precisely weighted and dissolved in 10 mL of solvent. The solvent was phenol/1,1,2,2-trichloroethylene (TCE)=6/4. The allowable error of the sample weight was 0.0001 g. The prepared sample was heated at about 80° C. to be dissolved. After completely dissolved, the sample solution was stayed at room temperature to be cooled down.

[0028] (2) The temperature of a thermotank was set to 30° C. and stayed at 30° C. for at least 1 hour.

[0029] (3) to was obtained by blank test: 10 mL of phenol/TCE (6/4) was injected into a viscometer and then placed in the thermotank for 5 minutes. The measurements were performed for at least three times, and the error could not be greater than 0.3 seconds. If the error was too large, the measurements were redone.

[0030] (4) 10 mL of the sample solution was injected into the viscometer and then placed in the thermotank for 5 minutes. The measurements were performed for at least three times, and the error could not be greater than 0.3 seconds. Then t could be obtained by averaging the measured to values above.

[0031] (5) The values of t.sub.0 and t were taken in to the equation below to obtain the inherent viscosity (IV).

[00001]$\mathrm{Inherent}.Math..Math.\mathrm{viscosity}.Math..Math.\left(\mathrm{IV}\right)=\frac{\ln \left(\frac{{\eta }_{\mathrm{Sample}}}{{\eta }_{\mathrm{Blank}}}\right)}{\mathrm{Polymer}.Math..Math.\mathrm{concentration}.Math..Math.\left(\frac{g}{\mathrm{dL}}\right)}=\frac{t/t_0}{0.3}$

[0032] The IV values of the comparative example, example 1, and example 2 are listed in table 1. In table 1, the IV difference before and after the solid-state polymerization of example 1 (0.20 dL/g) and example 2 (0.18 dL/g) were obviously greater than that of the comparative example (0.12 dL/g).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparative Items example Example 1 Example 2 Catalyst 20 ppm TBT 20 ppm TBT + 20 ppm TBT + 10 ppm 50 ppm Cs.sub.xWO.sub.3−yCl.sub.y CS.sub.xWO.sub.3−yCl.sub.y Polymerization time 2 h 55 m 2 h 35 m 3 h 10 m Solid-state 6 h 6 h 6 h polymerization time Solid-state 215° C. 215° C. 215° C. polymerization temperature IV before solid-state 0.68 0.69 0.71 polymerization (dL/g) IV after solid-state 0.80 0.87 0.91 polymerization (dL/g) IV difference (dL/g) 0.12 0.18 0.20

[0033] The PET pellets after solid-state polymerization was put in a sample vial and further placed on a white background to take photographs, as shown in FIG. 1. In FIG. 1, the yellowing degree of the comparative example (the catalyst contains TBT only) is more obvious than the examples 1 and 2.

[0034] For further verification, the PET pellets of the comparative example and the examples were thermocompressed into PET films having a thickness of 0.5 mm under 250° C. The color coordinates of the obtained PET films were measured by Hunter Lab Universal Color Quest XE. Please refer ASTM E313: “Standard Practice for Calculating Yellowness and Whiteness Indices from Instrumentally Measured Color Coordinates.” The measured yellowness indexes (Y.I.) were listed in table 2 below. In table 2, the Y.I. was decreased as the content of the cesium tungsten oxide was increased. This result is consistent with the results shown in FIG. 1. That is, the color of the PET pellets of the example 2 is less yellow than the color of the comparative example.

[0035] FIG. 2 is a transmittance spectrum of the PET films above measured by UV/VIS/IR spectrometer (SHIMAZU UV3600). The transmittance of the visible light (Tvis) and infrared (Tir) was calculated by ISO 9050 and listed in table 2. In table 2, under the similar visible light transmittance (Tvis, about 82%), the IR absorption of the example 1 (10 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide) was 0.4% more than the comparative example, and the IR absorption of the example 2 (50 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide) was 5.3% more than the comparative example. Therefore, the catalytic composition of this invention can absorb IR having a wavelength greater than 780 nm. This function can increase the soften rate of the heated parison in the back-end blowing process.

[0036] Moreover, light irradiation was used to simulate the conditions of the PET bottle blowing process to see whether the temperature of the example 2 added by 50 ppm of cesium tungsten oxide would be higher. Since the halogen lamps can be obtained more easily, and the emitted wavelength distribution of halogen lamps is close to the emitted wavelength distribution of the heating light source of the bottle blowing process, a 250 W halogen lamp was used to continuously irradiate samples for 10 minutes at a distance of 8.5 cm. The temperatures of the samples were recorded before and after the halogen-lamp irradiation. The results are listed in table 2. In table 2, the 10-minute temperature difference (ΔT) is 60.8° C. for the example 2, added with 50 ppm cesium tungsten oxide. Comparing with the comparative example (ΔT=51.4° C.), without being added with cesium tungsten oxide, the 10-minute temperature difference of the example 2 is 9.4° C. more than that of the comparative example. This result could proof that the catalytic composition of this invention can absorb IR with a wavelength more than 780 nm. Therefore, when the obtained PET resin is used in the bottle blowing process using IR heating, the soften rate of the heated parison can be shortened to decrease the process time and increase the production rate.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative Items example Example 1 Example 2 Y.I. 2.39 1.48 −0.13 Tvis (%) 82.2 82.0 82.4 Tir (%) 79.5 79.1 74.2 Surface T.sub.0 (° C.) 24.3 25.2 25.4 temperature of T.sub.10 min (° C.) 75.7 76.7 86.2 PET films* ΔT (° C.) 51.4 51.5 60.8 *Irradiated by a halogen lamp.