Shock sensor

Abstract

Disclosed is a shock sensor for detecting an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor, comprising: a microprocessor; a micro electromechanical system in communication with the microprocessor, the micro electromechanical system being integrated with a shock sensing device adapted to sense a shock generated by the attack in any direction and a microchip adapted to receive and store at least one parameter from the microprocessor and to analyze a shock signal generated by the shock based on the at least one parameter; and an output device connected with the microprocessor and adapted to output information based on an analysis result of the shock signal. According to the invention, the shock sensor can detect reliably any attack and has a simple circuit arrangement.

Claims

1. A shock sensor for detecting an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor, the shock sensor comprising: a microprocessor; a mode setting input device connected with the microprocessor and configured to receive first inputs to selectively set the shock sensor to a sensitivity determining mode, the mode setting input device having a first toggle switch that is operable by a user to provide the first inputs; a sensitivity adjusting input device connected with the microprocessor and configured to receive second inputs, the sensitivity adjusting input device having (i) a second toggle switch that is operable by the user to provide the second inputs and (ii) a potentiometer that is operable by the user to provide the second inputs; an output device in communication with the microprocessor; and a micro electromechanical system in communication with the microprocessor, the micro electromechanical system comprising: a shock sensing device configured to sense a shock signal generated by an attack in any direction; and a microchip operably integrated with the shock sensing device and configured to (i) receive and store a first threshold parameter from the microprocessor, (ii) compare the shock signal sensed by the shock sensing device with the first threshold parameter, and (iii) send an interrupt instruction to the microprocessor based on a result of the comparison, wherein the microprocessor is configured to (i) transmit the first threshold parameter to the microchip, (ii) receive the interrupt instruction from the microchip, and (iii) operate the output device to output information in response to receiving the interrupt instruction, wherein, while in the sensitivity determining mode, (i) the micro electromechanical system is configured to record an amplitude of the shock signal generated by a desired attack that is simulated in a predetermined time period, and (ii) the microprocessor is configured to determine the first threshold parameter based on the amplitude of the shock signal, wherein, when the first threshold parameter is determined in the sensitivity determining mode, the shock sensor is switched from the sensitivity determining mode to a mode other than the sensitivity determining mode, and wherein, while in the mode other than the sensitivity determining mode, the microprocessor is configured to determine the first threshold parameter based on the second inputs received at the sensitivity adjusting input device, the second toggle switch of the sensitivity adjusting input device selecting a sensitivity range for the shock sensor, the potentiometer of the sensitivity adjusting input device setting the first threshold parameter within the selected sensitivity range.

2. The shock sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein one of: the microchip includes a serial peripheral interface, and the microprocessor includes a corresponding serial peripheral interface connected with the serial peripheral interface of the microchip; and the microchip is in communication with the microprocessor in a wireless manner.

3. The shock sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of: the shock sensing device is an acceleration sensing device; the shock sensing device is configured to sample the shock signal at a sampling frequency of about 2 kHz; and the output device is an alarm device.

4. The shock sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein the microchip is programmable and comprises (i) a first register configured to store the first threshold parameter received from the microprocessor, (ii) a second register configured to store the shock signal received from the shock sensing device, (iii) a memory configured to store a program sequence to compare the shock signal with the first threshold parameter, and (iv) an on-chip interrupt controller configured to send the interrupt instruction to the microprocessor based on the result of the comparison.

5. The shock sensor as claimed in claim 1, further comprising at least one of: an additional input device having a third toggle switch, the additional input device being connected with the microprocessor, the microprocessor being configured to determine a second threshold parameter that is taken into account when the shock signal is compared by the microchip; and a tamper switch connected with the output device and configured to protect the shock sensor.

6. The shock sensor as claimed in claim 1, wherein: the shock sensor further comprises an indication device including an LED, the indication device being connected with the microprocessor; the output device comprises an optical alarm device and an acoustic alarm device; and the indication device is configured to assist in setting a sensitivity of the shock sensor and to function as the optical alarm device.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The invention and advantages thereof will be further understood by reading the following detailed description of some preferred exemplary embodiments with reference to the drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing essential components of a preferred exemplary embodiment of a shock sensor for sensing an attack on a facility equipped with the shock sensor.

(3) FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing a preferred exemplary embodiment of a MEMS of the shock sensor.

(4) FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram showing a preferred exemplary embodiment of some components connected with a microprocessor of the shock sensor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(5) Now, a shock sensor according to a preferred exemplary embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to FIG. 1. As previously described, the shock sensor is usually installed on some important facilities in order to detect a possible attack on the facilities and generate an alarm when the attack is determined as a real attack possibly breaking the facilities and/or causing any property loss.

(6) As shown in FIG. 1, the shock sensor 1 mainly comprises a MEMS 2 at least adapted to sample a shock signal which is transmitted to the MEMS 2, a microprocessor 3 adapted to be communicated with the MEMS 2, an alarm device 4 for generating an alarm in any suitable manners (preferably in an optical and/or acoustic manner) when the real attack is detected, and a power supply 5 at least for powering the MEMS 2 and the microprocessor 3.

(7) As further shown in FIG. 1, the alarm device 4 is connected with and controlled by means of the microprocessor 3.

(8) As an example, the power supply 5 may be a 3 VDC power supply.

(9) Preferably, as shown in FIG. 1, a serial peripheral interface (SPI) 6 of the microprocessor 3 is electrically connected with a SPI 7 of the MEMS 2, in order to achieve a communication between the microprocessor 3 and the MEMS 2 in a wired manner.

(10) Preferably, as shown FIG. 2, the MEMS 2 is at least integrated with a shock sensing device 8 for sensing all of three dimensional components of the shock signal, and a microchip 9 at least adapted to receive and store at least one parameter from the microprocessor 3 and to analyze the shock signal based on the at least one parameter.

(11) For example, the shock sensing device 8 samples the shock signal at a sampling frequency of 2 kHz.

(12) Preferably, the microchip 9 is programmable and a first preprogrammed program sequence is stored in the microchip 9 to analyze the shock signal. Further, the microchip 9 at least comprises a digital interface (such as the SPI 7), a first register for storing the at least one parameter transmitted from the microprocessor 3, a second register for storing the shock signal received from the shock sensing device 8, a memory for storing the first program sequence, and an on-chip interrupt controller at least adapted to send an interrupt instruction to the microprocessor 3 according to an analysis result of the shock signal.

(13) As an alternative, the MEMS 2 can be communicated with the microprocessor 3 in a wireless manner. In this case, the microchip 9 is provided with a wireless transceiver and the microprocessor 3 is provided with a corresponding wireless transceiver.

(14) Preferably, the shock sensing device 8 is an acceleration sensing device. It should be understood by a person skilled in the art that the shock sensing device 8 may be any other suitable sensing device, as long as the shock signal sensed by the shock sensing device 8 is able to describe really the attack.

(15) Preferably, the interrupt instruction is an instruction for indicating that the attack is determined as the real attack by analyzing the shock signal, and the instruction is sent immediately to the microprocessor 3 when the real attack is determined.

(16) Preferably, a second preprogrammed program sequence is stored in a memory of the microprocessor 3 to at least control the alarm device 4 according to the interrupt instruction received from the on-chip interrupt controller of the MEMS 2. When the microprocessor 3 receives the interrupt instruction, the microprocessor 3 sends a control signal to the alarm device 4 to generate the alarm.

(17) It may be understood by a person skilled in the art that a sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 usually needs to be adjusted when the shock sensor 1 is used in different applications and sites. Generally, as described above, the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 corresponds to a certain threshold value, with which an amplitude of the shock signal will be compared in operation. As an example, by comparing the amplitude of the shock signal generated by the attack with the threshold value (and additionally comparing a duration of the attack with a predetermined duration), the microchip 9 analyzes the shock signal and generates the alarm when the attack is determined as the real attack.

(18) To this end, as shown in FIG. 1, the shock sensor 1 further comprises a sensitivity adjusting device 10 for adjusting the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1. The sensitivity adjusting device 10 is connected with the microprocessor 3.

(19) As shown in FIG. 3, as an example, the sensitivity adjusting device 10 comprises at least one first DIP switch 11 and a potentiometer 12 which are connected with the microprocessor 3. The first DIP switch 11 is used for selecting different sensitivity levels (ranges) for the shock sensor 1 as desired, and the potentiometer 12 is used for setting accurately the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 in the selected sensitivity range. That is to say, the first DIP switch 11 and the potentiometer 12 cooperate with each other to set the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1. Once the first DIP switch 11 and the potentiometer 12 is adjusted well, the microprocessor 3 can determine the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 according to adjusted positions of the first DIP switch 11 and the potentiometer 12 when the shock sensor 1 is powered on. In this case, the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 can be maintained until the first DIP switch 11 and/or the potentiometer 12 is readjusted.

(20) It is preferable to provide four different sensitivity levels for the shock sensor 1. In this case, the at least one first DIP switch 11 comprises two DIP switches 11, as shown in FIG. 3. Each first DIP switch 11 has two setting positions and thereby the two DIP switches 11 are able to cooperate with each other to provide four different sensitivity levels.

(21) When the microprocessor 3 determines the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1, the threshold value corresponding to the determined sensitivity, as a parameter, is assigned to the first register of the microchip 9 by means of the microprocessor 3. Then, the microchip 9 can be used for analyzing the shock signal at least based on the determined sensitivity by using the first program sequence.

(22) Preferably, as shown in FIG. 1, the shock sensor 1 further comprises an indication device 13 at least for assisting in adjusting of the sensitivity, which is connected with and controlled by means of the microprocessor 3. More preferably, the indication device 13 can also undertake other function, for example, generating an optical alarm when the attack is determined as the real attack.

(23) According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the indication device 13 may be or comprises an LED, in particular a colored LED.

(24) For assisting in adjusting the sensitivity, as shown in FIG. 1, the shock sensor 1 preferably further comprises a mode setting device 14 connected with the microprocessor 3. The shock sensor 1 can be set to a normal working mode or a sensitivity determining mode by means of the mode setting device 14.

(25) Preferably, the mode setting device 14 is a second DIP switch, as shown in FIG. 3.

(26) In the normal working mode, the shock sensor 1 works normally to detect the attack. Preferably, when the shock sensor 1 is installed on the facility and set to the normal working mode by means of the mode setting device 14, the shock sensor 1 can be communicated with a control system (not shown) of the facility.

(27) Preferably, in the sensitivity determining mode, the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 can be determined intelligently as follows. Specifically, a process for determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 comprises the following steps:

(28) a) setting the shock sensor 1 to the sensitivity determining mode by means of the mode setting device 14 and powering the shock sensor 1 on;

(29) b) simulating a desired attack in a predetermined time period and recording an amplitude of the shock signal generated by the desired attack in the predetermined time period by means of the MEMS 2; and

(30) c) determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 at least based on the amplitude of the shock signal.

(31) Preferably, the process for determining the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 is carried out in the microchip 9. Of course, the process can also be carried out in the microprocessor 3.

(32) Once the sensitivity is determined, the shock sensor 1 is set to not be in the sensitivity determining mode and the sensitivity of the shock sensor 1 is finally adjusted to the determined sensitivity by means of the sensitivity adjusting device 10 with the help of the indication device 13.

(33) In operation, in addition to the comparison between the amplitude of the shock signal and the threshold value, an additional characteristic value of the shock signal needs to be compared with the corresponding additional threshold value to further decrease false alarm and missing alarm. To this end, the shock sensor 1 further comprises an additional setting device connected with the microprocessor 3 and adapted to set the corresponding additional threshold value. Preferably, the additional setting device is used for selecting one additional threshold from a plurality of predetermined values. In this case, the additional setting device preferably is a third DIP switch 15, as shown in FIG. 3.

(34) As further shown in FIG. 3, the two first DIP switches 11, the second DIP switch 14 and the third DIP switch 15 preferably are integrated into a single module and the module is available from market.

(35) Preferably, the shock sensor 1 further comprises a tamper switch for self protection. The tamper switch is connected with the alarm device 4 and generates an alarm when the shock sensor 1 is subjected to damage.

(36) While certain embodiments have been described, these embodiments have been presented by way of example only, and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention. The attached claims and their equivalents are intended to cover all the modifications, substitutions and changes as would fall within the scope and spirit of the invention.