ELECTROMAGNETIC TOOL USING SLOTTED POINT DIPOLE ANTENNAS
20230238680 · 2023-07-27
Inventors
Cpc classification
E21B47/01
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
E21B49/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
H01Q9/16
ELECTRICITY
G01V3/26
PHYSICS
International classification
H01Q9/16
ELECTRICITY
E21B49/00
FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
G01V3/38
PHYSICS
G01V3/26
PHYSICS
Abstract
Slotted dipole antennas for use in an antenna system on a drill collar segment is presented. Dipoles may be placed in slots on the drill collar segment. A dipole consists of a ferrite rod with electric wires placed above and below the ferrite rod. Wires may be connected such that wire current forms a loop around the ferrite rod. When a group of slots are used for an antenna, wire holes are constructed between slots. Effectively a single wire may be used to go above all ferrite rods in the group and then turn to go below all the ferrite rods. Two wire segments are in a wire hole connecting two adjacent slots. Currents in the two segments are the same in magnitudes and flow in opposite directions. There is no net current in wires in a wire hole.
Claims
1. An electromagnetic wave propagation tool comprising: an antenna system disposed on a drill collar segment, the antenna system including a magnetic dipole antenna comprising slot based magnetic dipoles, the slot based magnetic dipoles comprising: a plurality of wire holes positioned beneath an outer surface of the drill collar segment; at least two slots positioned in the outer surface of the drill collar segment, the wire holes connecting a plurality of slots with each other; a ferrite rod placed in each slot; and, a continuous antenna wire passing through slots and wire holes via a first route, the continuous antenna wire turning around and repassing through the slots and the wire holes via a second route such that two wire segments in each slot are positioned above and below each ferrite rod.
2. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the magnetic dipole antenna is a transmitter antenna.
3. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the magnetic dipole antenna is a receiver antenna.
4. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the slots and slot based magnetic dipoles are in an axial direction and are substantially uniformly distributed azimuthally about an axis of the drill collar segment, the slot based magnetic dipoles being at one axial location on the drill collar segment and are in phase forming a collective axial antenna.
5. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the slots and slot based magnetic dipoles are in an axial direction and are substantially uniformly distributed azimuthally about an axis of the drill collar segment.
6. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein slots and slot based magnetic dipoles are in an axial direction and are disposed into three groups azimuthally distributed about an axis of the drill collar segment.
7. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the slots and slot based magnetic dipoles are parallel in a cross-axial direction and are in phase forming a collective cross-axial antenna, the electromagnetic wave propagation tool further comprising a subsystem for obtaining a tool face angle of the cross-axial axis.
8. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 7, wherein the slot based magnetic dipoles are disposed into two axially distributed groups positioned 180 degrees apart azimuthally about a center axis of the drill collar segment.
9. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the slots and slot based magnetic dipoles are in a cross-axial direction, and the continuous antenna wire is arranged such that two dipole groups of slot based magnetic dipoles are formed, the slot based magnetic dipoles in each group are in phase and the two dipole groups of slot based magnetic dipoles are 180 degrees out of phase.
10. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 1, wherein the slot based magnetic dipoles consist of two groups with a first group consisting of axial slot based dipoles and a second group consisting of cross-axial slot based dipoles in a cross-axial direction and are in phase, forming a collective slant antenna; and wherein the electromagnetic wave propagation tool further comprises a subsystem for obtaining a tool face angle.
11. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 10, wherein the first group of axial slot based dipoles are disposed at two axial dipole locations on the drill collar segment and the second group of cross-axial slot based dipoles are disposed on the drill collar segment in between the two axial dipole locations so that a center of collective axial dipole moment coincides with a center of collective cross-axial dipole moment.
12. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 10, wherein the electromagnetic wave propagation tool further comprises a transceiver electronics system configured to divide face space of the electromagnetic wave propagation tool into several bins and collecting and averaging receiver data in each bin.
13. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 12, wherein the transceiver electronics system further comprises subsystems for processing binned data into a data distribution over tool face angle.
14. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 12, wherein the transceiver electronics system further comprises subsystems for processing binned data into a parameter indicative of formation azimuthal properties.
15. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 12, wherein the transceiver electronics system further comprises subsystems for transforming binned data into coefficients of a Fourier series of tool face angle.
16. An electromagnetic wave propagation tool comprising: a transceiver electronics system disposed on a drill collar segment, the transceiver electronics system comprising a magnetic dipole based antenna having: a plurality of slot based magnetic dipoles comprising at least two slots in an outer surface of the drill collar segment and wire holes beneath the outer surface of the drill collar segment, the wire holes connecting adjacent slots; ferrite rods positioned in the slots; a first continuous antenna wire routed through a first set of the slots via the wire holes in a first route and turns around to repass through the first set of the slots and wire holes via a second route, wherein two wire segments of the first continuous antenna wire in each slot are positioned above and below each ferrite rod within each slot, the first continuous antenna wire further connecting to and from the transceiver electronic system; a second continuous antenna wire routed through a second set of the slots via the wire holes in a third route and turns around to repass through the second set of slots and wire holes in a fourth route, wherein two wire segments of the second continuous antenna wire in each slot are positioned above and below each ferrite rod within each slot, the second continuous antenna wire further connecting to and from the transceiver electronic system; and, wherein the transceiver electronics system further comprises a subsystem that maintains relative amplitude and phase between currents in the first continuous antenna wire and the second continuous antenna wire.
17. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 16, wherein relative amplitude and phase between the first continuous antenna wire and the second continuous antenna wire results in an axial dipole antenna.
18. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 16, wherein relative amplitude and phase between the first continuous antenna wire and the second continuous antenna wire results in a cross-axial dipole antenna.
19. The electromagnetic wave propagation tool of claim 16, wherein: the slots and wire holes are in a steerable antenna pattern; the first continuous antenna wire and the second continuous antenna wire follow steerable antenna routes; and, the transceiver electronics system further comprises a subsystem for obtaining a tool face.
20. A magnetic dipole based antenna for use an antenna system disposed on a drill collar segment, comprising: a plurality of slot based magnetic dipoles comprising at least two slots in an outer surface of the drill collar segment and wire holes beneath the outer surface of the drill collar segment, the wire holes connecting adjacent slots; ferrite rods positioned in the slots; and, a continuous antenna wire passing through slots and wire holes via a first route, the continuous antenna wire turning around and repassing through the slots and the wire holes via a second route such that two wire segments in each slot are positioned above and below each ferrite rod.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0046] Like reference numerals in the figures represent and refer to the same or similar element or function. Embodiments of the present disclosure may be better understood when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed pictorial illustrations, schematics, graphs, drawings, and appendices. In the drawings:
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS
[0070] Generally, multiple slots are cut around the surface of an antenna section. For axial antennas, the slots are in the direction of a cylindrical axis of a tool and are distributed circumferentially. Beneath a sub-surface, wire holes perpendicular to the slots are made to connect the slots, forming a circumferential wire passageway. Highly magnetically-permeable ferrite rods are positioned in the slots. An antenna wire is positioned in a first direction around in a wire path above the ferrite rods. The antenna wire is then positioned in a second direction in an opposite direction of the first position such that the antenna wire is underneath the ferrite rods. Net current in a wire hole connecting two adjacent slots is zero. The net current around each ferrite rod forms a closed loop. Each ferrite rod may act as a point dipole. A group of point dipoles forms an antenna. The slot structure makes the antenna structure durable. Electric current in and around wire holes and slots induced by antenna current is much smaller than that of any prior art antenna structure. The antenna efficiency is improved. The antenna response is well tracked by a model with point-dipole antennas. An antenna in a non-axial direction can be made by a group of slots cut on the sub surface in a pre-designed direction. Wire holes, ferrite rods, and antenna wire are arranged in a way similar to that of axial antenna.
[0071] Before explaining at least one embodiment of the present disclosure in detail, it is to be understood that embodiments of the present disclosure are not limited in their application to the details of construction and the arrangement of the components or steps or methodologies set forth in the following description or illustrated in the drawings. The inventive concepts in the present disclosure are capable of other embodiments or of being practiced or carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting.
[0072] In this detailed description of embodiments of the inventive concepts, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a more thorough understanding of the inventive concepts. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the inventive concepts disclosed and claimed herein may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known features have not been described in detail to avoid unnecessarily complicating the instant disclosure.
[0073] As used herein, language such as “including,” “comprising,” “having,” “containing,” or “involving,” and variations thereof, is intended to be broad and encompass the subject matter listed thereafter, equivalents, and additional subject matter not recited or inherently present therein.
[0074] Unless expressly stated to the contrary, “or” refers to an inclusive or and not to an exclusive or. For example, a condition A or B is satisfied by anyone of the following: A is true (or present) and B is false (or not present), A is false (or not present) and B is true (or present), and both A and B are true (or present).
[0075] In addition, use of the “a” or “an” are employed to describe elements and components of the embodiments herein. This is done merely for convenience and to give a general sense of the inventive concepts. This description should be read to include one or at least one and the singular also includes the plural unless it is obvious that it is meant otherwise.
[0076] Throughout this disclosure and the claims, the terms “about,” “approximately,” and “substantially” are intended to signify that the item being qualified is not limited to the exact value specified, but includes slight variations or deviations therefrom, caused by measuring error, manufacturing tolerances, stress exerted on various parts, wear and tear, or combinations thereof, for example.
[0077] The use of the term “at least one” will be understood to include one and any quantity more than one, including but not limited to each of, 2, 3, 4, 5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50, 100, and all integers therebetween. The term “at least one” may extend up to 100 or 1000 or more, depending on the term to which it is attached; in addition, the quantities of 100/1000 are not to be considered limiting, as higher limits may also produce satisfactory results. Singular terms shall include pluralities and plural terms shall include the singular unless indicated otherwise.
[0078] The term “or combinations thereof” as used herein refers to all permutations and/or combinations of the listed items preceding the term. For example, “A, B, C, or combinations thereof” is intended to include at least one of: A, B, C, AB, AC, BC, or ABC, and if order is important in a particular context, also BA, CA, CB, CBA, BCA, ACB, BAC, or CAB. Continuing with this example, expressly included are combinations that contain repeats of one or more item or term, such as BB, AAA, AAB, BBC, AAABCCCC, CBBAAA, CABABB, and so forth. The skilled artisan will understand that typically there is no limit on the number of items or terms in any combination, unless otherwise apparent from the context.
[0079] Circuitry, as used herein, could be analog and/or digital components, or one or more suitably programmed microprocessors and associated hardware and software, or hardwired logic. Also, certain portions of the implementations may be described as “components” that perform one or more functions. The term “component,” may include hardware, such as a processor, an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), or a field programmable gate array (FPGA), or a combination of hardware and software. Software includes one or more computer executable instructions that when executed by one or more component cause the component to perform a specified function. It should be understood that the algorithms described herein are stored on one or more non-transitory memory. Exemplary non-transitory memory includes random access memory, read only memory, flash memory or the like. Such non-transitory memory can be electrically based or optically based.
[0080] As used herein any reference to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular element, feature, structure, or characteristic described in the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification are not necessarily referring to the same embodiment, although the inventive concepts disclosed herein are intended to encompass all combinations and permutations including one or more features of the embodiments described.
[0081] In the present disclosure, LWD may mean both FEMWD and LWD. FEMWD is the measurement of formation properties while a well is being drilled. LWD stands for Logging While Drilling.
[0082] A resistivity tool within the present disclosure refers to a LWD wave propagation resistivity tool exclusively unless specified otherwise.
[0083] Referring to
[0084] The expanded views of the antenna wire 75 and ferrite rods 33a of
[0085]
[0086] The point-dipoles may point in the same direction as shown in
[0087] Wu antenna includes designs for non-axial antenna made of a collection of coherent point-dipoles pointing in a desired direction. Wisler et al., (U.S. Pat. No. 9,885,800, herein referred to as Wisler 2006, and incorporated by reference in its entirety), teaches the designs of cross-axial and other non-axial antennas with slot and slot-like structures (Wisler 2006).
[0088]
[0089] The actual width of the slot opening 93 can be made smaller than what is shown in the schematic view of
[0090]
[0091]
[0092]
[0093]
[0094]
[0095]
[0096] The tuning circuit 112a illustrated in
[0097] In some embodiments the antenna mechanical structures and structures for housing antenna tuning circuits and transceiver circuit as well as wire pathways between different locations may be very similar to those of prior art. Existing tools may be upgraded to include an embodiment of the current invention with no or small modifications in mechanical structures.
[0098] The structure that includes slots and wire holes for both halves of the X-Z antenna combo 152 is hereafter termed an X-Z steerable antenna structure or simply a steerable antenna structure. The slot and wire hole locations and orientations are also hereafter referred to being in a steerable antenna pattern. Hereafter, the wire route in
[0099]
[0100] As a transmitter the X-Z steerable antenna 154 can be made to be a pure axial dipole or a pure cross-axial dipole or a slant dipole pointing in a direction between Z and X. If the current amplitudes are the same in the two antenna wires 114 and 114a (zero relative amplitude, or unit amplitude ratio) and the phases are such that the two closed net current loops around a cross-axial ferrite rod are exactly 180 degrees out of phase, then the total net current around a cross-axial ferrite rod is zero. The net currents on all the axial ferrite rods are the same and are in phase. The transmitter is a pure axial magnetic dipole antenna. If the two closed net current loops on a cross-axial ferrite rod are in phase, then the net current loops around axial ferrite rods powered by the first antenna wire 114 are 180 degrees out of phase with those of the second antenna wire 114a. One half of the axial ferrite rods on a half circle are 180 degrees out of phase with the other half. If the amplitude ratio between the two wire currents is one, then the net axial dipole moment for each circle is zero. The axial ferrite rods on one circle forms a quadrupole. A second quadrupole is formed from the other circle of axial ferrite rods. The two quadrupoles are completely out of phase. The total quadrupole moment is also zero. The two quadrupoles are separated by the distance between the two circles. There is a small octupole that has a negligible effect on the antenna. The transmitter behaves as a cross-axial magnetic dipole antenna.
[0101] The phase of a transmitting ferrite rod without hysteresis is that of the wire current. The relative phase between the magnetic dipole components excited by the two wire currents is that of the two wire currents. The collective magnetic dipole in a cross-axial direction in the X-Z steerable antenna 154 depicted in
M.sub.x=C I.sub.1[sin(ωt)+B sin(ωt+φ)] (EQ. 1)
wherein x is the cross-axial axis defined by the cross-axial slots in the X-Z steerable antenna 154, I.sub.1 is the current in wire 114, M.sub.x is the magnetic dipole moment in the x direction, product c I.sub.1 is the amplitude of the total magnetic dipole moment in the x-direction powered by the current in antenna wire 114, B is the amplitude ratio of current in wire 114a over current in wire 114, ω is the current frequency, sin( ) is the sine function, and φ is the relative phase between the two currents.
[0102] Each cross-axial ferrite rod is powered by both a first current and a second current. The first term on the right hand side of EQ. 1 is the magnetic dipole generated by the first current. The second is by the second current. Without a loss of generality, the phase of the collective cross-axial dipole is defined as being relative to that of the first current. As such, the phase of the first term is zero and the phase for the second term is the relative phase between the two terms.
[0103] EQ. 1 can be rewritten as:
M.sub.x=C I.sub.1√{square root over (1+B.sup.2+2B cos(φ))} sin{ωt+A TAN 2[B sin(φ),1+B cos(φ)]} (EQ. 2)
wherein cos( ) is the cosine function and A TAN 2[ ] is the inverse tangent function with two arguments. The amplitude and phase of the collective cross-axial dipole are C I.sub.1√{square root over (1+B.sup.2+2B cos(φ))} and A TAN 2[B sin(φ), 1+B cos(φ)], respectively.
[0104] The collective magnetic moment in an axial direction is:
M.sub.z=A I.sub.1[sin(ωt)−B sin(ωt+φ)] (EQ.3)
wherein z is the axial axis defined by the axial slots in the X-Z steerable antenna 154, M.sub.z is the total magnetic dipole moment in the z direction, A I.sub.1 is the amplitude of the total magnetic dipole moment in the z-direction powered by the first current.
[0105] Each axial ferrite rod is powered by either the first current or the second current, but not by both. The first term on the right hand side of EQ. 3 is the total axial magnetic moment powered by the first current. The second is by the second current. The minus sign between the two terms is the result of the two cross-axial dipole components powered by the two currents being additive, the two axial dipole components powered by the two currents are subtractive, and vice versa. This property is determined by the steerable wire routes by design. Therefore, the two signs between the two terms in EQS. 1 and 3 are opposite. Which of the two signs is plus is a choice on how the relative phase between the two currents is defined. If the relative phase between the two currents is defined to be φ+180 instead of φ, then the two signs in EQS. 1 and 3 are reversed. Both choices on relative phase are equally valid. Antenna property and behavior do not depend on which choice is used in the equations. Hereinafter, the relative phase between the two currents is the φ used in EQS. 1 and 3. The phase of the collective axial dipole is also defined as being relative to that of the first current.
[0106] EQ. 3 can be rewritten as:
M.sub.z=Al.sub.1√{square root over (1+B.sup.2−2B cos(φ))} sin{ωt+A TAN 2[−B sin(φ),1−B cos(φ)]} (EQ. 4)
The amplitude and phase of the collective axial dipole are A I.sub.1√{square root over (1+B.sup.2−2B cos(φ))} and A TAN 2[−B sin(φ), 1−B cos(φ)] respectively. The relative phase between the collective cross-axial dipole and the collective axial dipole is A TAN 2[B sin(φ), 1+B cos(φ)]−A TAN 2[−B sin(φ), 1−B cos(φ)].
[0107] The total collective dipole vector is a vector sum of M.sub.x and M.sub.z in order to have a magnetic dipole in a constant direction (a linear dipole), the relative phase between the cross-axial component M.sub.x and axial component M.sub.z must be zero or a multiple of 180 degrees. As such:
A TAN 2[B sin(φ),1+B cos(φ)]−A TAN 2[−B sin(φ),1−B cos(φ)]=nπ (EQ. 5)
wherein n=0, ±1 and π is the Archimedes' constant (the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter).
[0108] EQ. 5 is applicable only when neither M.sub.x nor M.sub.z has a zero amplitude. When the amplitude of M.sub.z is zero the resulting collective dipole is a linear dipole in a cross-axial direction regardless of its phase. Similarly, when the amplitude of M.sub.x is zero the resulting collective dipole is a linear dipole in an axial direction regardless of its phase. It can be proven that the necessary and sufficient condition for either M.sub.x or M.sub.z to have a zero amplitude is (B=1 and sin(φ)=0). The (B=1 and φ=0 degrees) condition results in the transmitter being a cross-axial dipole with zero axial dipole moment. The (B=1 and φ=180 degrees) condition results in the transmitter being an axial dipole with zero cross-axial dipole moment.
[0109] If B=1 and sin(φ)≠0, then the relative phase between the two dipole components is 90 or −90 degrees. EQ. 5 is thus violated. Therefore, the (B=1 and sin(φ)≠0) condition leads to the transmitter being a nonlinearly-polarized dipole. The resulting transmitter is an elliptically polarized magnetic dipole. The eccentricity of the ellipse is a function of the relative phase φ between the first current and the second current. When
where A TAN( ) is the inverse tangent function, the ellipse becomes a circle. The transmitter becomes a circularly polarized magnetic dipole antenna. When sin(φ) is zero. the ellipse degenerates into a line. The resulting transmitter is a linearly polarized dipole. For B=1 the transmitter can be made into an elliptically polarized magnetic dipole when sin(φ)≠0, or a linearly polarized magnetic dipole in a cross-axial direction when φ=0, or a linearly-polarized magnetic dipole in an axial direction when φ=180 degrees. To make a steerable transmitter into a linearly polarized magnetic dipole antenna in a direction between the axial and cross-axial axes the two wire currents must be different.
[0110] For B≠1 EQ. 5 gives us
[0111] There are four solutions to EQ.6: B=0; B=∞; φ=0; and φ=180 degrees. B being zero means that the second current is zero and the first current is non-zero. The resulting transmitter is a slanted linear dipole. The slant angle of the dipole relative to the axial axis is
B being infinite indicates that the first current is zero and the second current is non-zero. The resulting transmitter is a slanted linear dipole with a slant angle of
A linear dipole with a slant angle at
in the X-Z plane is a linear dipole at
wan a 180 degree phase difference. The route of wire 114 and route of wire 114a in the routes of the steerable antenna 154 are identical except that they are 180 degrees apart azimuthally about the antenna cylindrical axis. The azimuthal angle of a tool about its cylindrical axis (drill string axis) is termed tool face. Rotating the antenna cylinder by 180 degrees in tool face, the two wire routes switch positions. Because the axial slot structure and ferrite rods are identical among themselves, the amplitude ratio between the total cross-axial and axial dipoles when only current 2 is non-zero (B=∞) is the same as that when only current 1 is non-zero (B=0). The absolute values of the slant angles in those two cases are the same. The only difference between the two cases is that the two slanted dipoles are 180 degrees apart both in tool face and in dipole phase. The ratio
is independent of the amplitude of the wire current. It is determined by the steerable antenna structure.
[0112] When φ=0 the X-Z steerable antenna 154 becomes a linearly-polarized magnetic dipole with a slant angle
from the cylindrical axis of the steerable antenna 154, wherein ACOS( ) is the inverse of cosine function. The slant angle is a function of B. B can be chosen to be a value in the domain [0, +∞). The range of θ.sub.s is between
[0113] When φ=180 degrees the steerable antenna 154 is a linearly-polarized magnetic dipole with a slant angle
from the cylindrical axis of the steerable antenna 154, wherein A SIN( ) is the inverse of sine function. The range of θ.sub.s is between
By choosing φ to be either 0 or 180 degrees, the slant angle θ.sub.s can be made to be anywhere between
The entire range of the slant angle is 180 degrees. A linearly-polarized magnetic-dipole antenna in any direction in the X-Z plane can be embodied in the steerable antenna 154. For example, by setting B to be
and φ to be 0 if A≥C or 180 degrees if A<C the steerable antenna 154 depicted in
[0114] A receiving linearly-polarized magnetic dipole antenna can be embodied in a steerable antenna in the same way as a transmitting magnetic dipole antenna with the same linear-polarization property. A set of (B, φ) that makes a transmitting steerable antenna a slant linearly-polarized magnetic dipole makes a receiving steerable antenna a magnetic dipole with the same linear polarization and slant angle. As such, embodiments herein can be applied to the steerable antenna to create an axial dipole, or a cross-axial dipole, or a slant linearly-polarized dipole, or an elliptically-polarized dipole receiver.
[0115] Embodiments herein can be used to construct a pure cross-axial antenna without any axial component.
[0116]
[0117] Measurements from a pair of axial transmitter-receiver antennas on a LWD tool are invariant under tool face rotation. The measurements can't be used to sense the azimuthal variations of formation properties about drill string axis. Measurements from a pair of transmitter-receiver antennas where one antenna is axial and the other is cross-axial can be sensitive to tool face angle of the cross-axial axis. Some azimuthal variations of formation properties can be determined from the measurements. If a formation is not azimuthally invariant, then the receiver reading is a function of the tool face of the cross-axial axis. By measuring the tool face angle for each receiver reading, a receiver data distribution can be obtained over tool face after the tool has rotated at least 360 degrees. A transmitter-receiver antenna pair with both being in cross-axial directions produces measurements sensitive to azimuthal variations of formation property.
[0118] Each resistivity measurement is made with a constant sampling window. Measurements are made on constant time-intervals. The rotational speed of a drill string can vary during drilling operations. A constant time interval between measurements does not translate into a constant tool face increment. The data distribution over tool face can be on unevenly-spaced tool face angles. For convenience of data processing and interpretation, the data distribution over tool face is often obtained or transformed into data on constantly-spaced tool face grids or bins. The transformation is accomplished by dividing the entire 0 to 360 degree tool-face space into multiple equal-sized bins. A receiver reading is assigned to a bin where the tool face angle at the time of the reading lies. If multiple readings fall into a bin, then all the readings in that bin are averaged into a reading for that bin. After measurement data has been collected for all bins, one set of data distribution over tool face is obtained. The complete set of binned data may be directly stored along with the time (cycle time) at the middle of the measurement cycle for the complete set of binned data. The set of binned data may be further processed and the results of processing along with the cycle time are stored in memory. Then, all bins are cleared for the next set of distribution data. The variable drill-string rotational speed causes the measurement cycle to be variable. The measurement cycle is managed dynamically by resistivity tool's electronic system.
[0119] The measurement data distributions over tool face in binned format can be directly used for an image log which is a two-dimensional plot over well depth and tool face angle. A distribution over tool face is plotted at the average depth of a tool during the time period when data in all the bins are collected for the distribution. The average depth is the tool depth at the cycle time. Time-to-depth correlation is performed by a logging system that includes a resistivity tool.
[0120] The frequencies used by LWD tools are much higher than the rotational frequency of a drill string during drilling process. For modeling tool response and data interpretation for a tool at a tool face angle, the tool may be considered to be stationary at that position.
[0121] Electromagnetic field generated by a transmitter on a wave propagation resistivity tool is a linear field and possesses the superposition property. A cross-axial transmitter dipole is a vector in the X-Y plane in a Cartesian coordinate system stationary with respect to Earth (well frame) where z-axis is the cylindrical axis of the antenna cylinder and drill string. At any tool face the dipole can be viewed as a vector consisting of two component vectors in the X and Y direction. The dipole is the vector sum of the two component vectors. Namely the dipole vector is given by
{right arrow over (D)}(φ)=COS(φ)D {circumflex over (x)}+SIN(φ)D ŷ (EQ. 7),
where φ is the tool face angle of the cross-axial transmitter, {right arrow over (D)}(φ) is the transmitter dipole vector at tool face φ, D is the dipole moment of the transmitter, {circumflex over (x)} and ŷ are unit vectors of the X and Y axes of the well frame, respectively.
[0122] The superposition principle dictates that the electromagnetic field generated by a cross-axial transmitter dipole at a tool face angle is the same as the vector sum of fields separately generated by the two component vectors, respectively. The axial component of the field on the z-axis some distance away measured by an axial dipole receiver is
V(φ)=COS(φ)V.sub.zx+SIN(φ)V.sub.zy (EQ. 8),
where V(φ) is the complex receiver voltage representing phase and amplitude when the cross-axial transmitter is at tool face angle φ, V.sub.zx and V.sub.zy are axial receiver voltages when the tool face of the cross-axial transmitter are at zero and ninety degrees, respectively.
[0123] The receiver voltage of a cross-axial receiver on electromagnetic field generated by an axial transmitter dipole is also a simple sinusoidal function of tool face similar to that of EQ. 8.
[0124] The receiver measurement from an axial and cross-axial transmitter-receiver pair varies with tool face as a sinusoidal function. As a Fourier series of tool face the measurement only has two non-zero coefficients.
[0125] The measurement by a slanted linear magnetic dipole receiver on electromagnetic field generated by a slanted linear magnetic dipole transmitter is given by
where φ is tool face angle, (θ.sub.R,φ.sub.R) are receiver slanted angle and tool face offset, (θ.sub.T,φ.sub.T) are transmitter slanted angle and tool face offset, matrix element is the receiver voltage if the receiver is in i-direction and the transmitter is in j-direction in a well frame.
[0126] The matrix V in EQ. 9 is termed the transfer matrix or transfer function. It can be proven that the coefficients of Fourier transform of V(φ) for third and all higher order harmonics in tool face angle φ are zero. There are at most five non-zero coefficients in a Fourier series for receiver measurements over tool face for a pair of linear magnetic dipole transmitter and receiver. Thus, the tool face variation of a receiver voltage can be characterized by a function with at most five complex parameters. The minimum number of bins required for extracting the five parameters is five.
[0127] With five bins, each bin spans seventy-two degrees in tool face. The tool face angle of a piece of data may be anywhere within this tool face interval. The error from sampling jitter can be substantial (e.g., thirty-six degrees in tool face). By using more bins than the necessary (e.g., minimum of five in the data binning process), the jitter error is reduced. Over-sampled data also reduces random measurement error. Increasing the number of bins will increase data storage requirement. The choice for the number of bins is a balance between minimizing jitter and random errors and minimizing data storage requirement.
[0128] In some embodiments, each bin is divided into multiple smaller sub-bins. After data for all the sub-bins in every bin are collected, the data collection for one tool face distribution is deemed complete. The data from all the sub-bins in a bin are averaged or summed to be the data for the bin. Only this data may be stored. As such, the sub-bin size limits the jitter error. The high number of sub-bins may also reduce random error. The small number of bins does not burden the data storage system.
[0129] In some embodiments, receiver measurement, as well as the tool face angle at which the receiver measurement is made, is temporarily recorded during the measurement process. After data has been collected for all the bins, the complete set of binned data is either stored into memory or processed into Fourier series coefficients (Fourier decomposition) to be stored into memory. Since the tool face angles are not on uniformly-spaced grid, the Fourier decomposition is performed using a technique designed for irregularly sampled data. As discussed herein, Fourier coefficients for third or higher order harmonics are zero for measurement from each linear dipole transmitter-receiver pair. There are only five non-zero coefficients. These five non-zero coefficients can be determined in a direct data-fitting optimization method such as the least-squares. Since the precise value of the tool face angle associated with each receiver measurement is used there is no jitter error. The number of bins or sub-bins does not have to be large to minimizing jitter error. A set of coarse bins can be used.
[0130] Random noise and other errors in binned data can cause the Fourier coefficients for third and higher order harmonics to be non-zero. The third or higher order Fourier coefficients maybe computed and stored into memory. The value of those coefficients can be used to gauge the measurement quality of binned data.
[0131] Five or more measurements over tool face angle may be used to determine the possible five non-zero Fourier coefficients. If the measurements are over a small range of tool face (azimuthal angle), then the underline azimuthal variation to be measured may be small compared with the system measurement error. The signal-to-noise ratio may be poor. By requiring measurement data present in each bin this problem is avoided in this embodiment.
[0132] In a directional well gravity tool face is used for tool face measurement. It is given by:
φ=A TAN 2(G.sub.y,−G.sub.x) (EQ. 10)
where G.sub.x and G.sub.y are gravity components in the cross-axial X and Y directions in a Cartesian coordinate system fixed on the tool segment (sensor frame) with drill string axis as the Z-axis. The gravity components are measured by accelerometers in a directional sensing system when the drill string is at rest. This is done during the pipe change period when a drill string segment is added to or removed from the drill string and the downhole section of the drill string is at rest.
[0133] In some embodiments, magnetic tool face is dynamically measured during the drilling process. Gravity tool face is obtained from the magnetic tool face. Magnetic tool face is measured by magnetometers and the measurement is unaffected during the drilling process by mechanical factors which destroy gravity measurements using accelerometers. Magnetic tool face φ.sub.m is
φ.sub.m=A TAN 2(−M.sub.y,M.sub.x) (EQ. 11)
where M.sub.x and M.sub.y are Geomagnetic field components in X and Y cross-axial directions in the sensor frame, respectively.
[0134] The difference between magnetic and gravity tool faces φ−φ.sub.m is a function of the dip angle of the Geomagnetic field, the inclination and azimuth of the drill string segment where a directional sensor is located. It is not a function of tool face. It is unchanged as the drill string rotates if the attitude of the drill string remains the same. In this embodiment the instantaneous gravity tool face of the x-axis of a magnetometer used for the dynamic measurement of the Geomagnetic field is given by:
φ=φ.sub.m+(φ−φ.sub.m).sub.Last Survey (EQ. 12),
[0135] where φ and φ.sub.m are the instantaneous gravity and magnetic tool faces while a drill string is rotating, (φ−φ.sub.m).sub.LastSurvey is the stationary gravity and Geomagnetic tool face difference obtained from the latest directional sensor survey conducted during a pipe change period when the drill string is at rest. The approximation used in deriving EQ. 12 is that between two stationary surveys the attitude of the drill string and the well changes very little. The gravity tool face error associated with this approximation is much smaller than the tool face accuracy requirement for data binning.
[0136] The magnetometers used for dynamically measuring geomagnetic field components in cross-axial directions during the drilling process may not be the same ones used for stationary directional survey. The two sets of cross-axial magnetometers maybe azimuthally misaligned about the drill string axis. The EQ. 12 is still valid and may be used to obtain the gravity tool face angle of the cross-axial X-axis of the dynamic magnetometer system.
[0137] The cross-axial component of a linear dipole antenna may be offset in tool face from the X-axis of the sensor frame of a dynamic magnetometer system. This offset is a known constant. The instantaneous gravity tool face of the cross-axial component of an linear dipole antenna is:
φ.sub.g=φ.sub.m+(φ−φ.sub.m).sub.Last Survey+Δφ (EQ. 13),
wherein φ.sub.g is the gravity tool face of the cross-axis of the antenna and Δφ is the tool face offset between the X axes of the antenna and the dynamic magnetometer system.
[0138] Directional sensor systems may be part of the electronic system of a resistivity tool with cross-axial antenna components. Cylindrical sections housing the directional sensor system may be part of a resistivity tool segment.
[0139] Prior art LWD tools with cross-axial antennas have been used to measure one or more parameters of formation properties. A LWD tool with cross-axial antennas using embodiments described herein can be more efficient and more accurate than those of prior art.
[0140] Referring to
wherein R is the radial distance from the middle of the ferrite rod 33a to the centerline of the steel sub, d is the axial magnetic dipole moment of each ferrite rod 33a construct, and N is the total number of ferrite rods 33a. The approximation used in obtaining EQ. 14 is that N is assumed to be large so that the ferrite rod dipoles are assumed to be uniformly and continuously distributed circumferentially. For exact value the factor
in EQ. 14 is replaced by the average of the absolute values of X-coordinates of all the ferrite rods 33a in this coordinate system if N is even and slots 15a are uniformly distributed as shown in
[0141] The Z-X component Q.sub.zx equals to Q.sub.xz by the definition of quadrupole moments. All other components of the quadrupole tensor are zero.
[0142] By crossing antenna wire segments in the wire hole 31a not diametrically opposite of wire passageway 65, the antenna includes both a dipole and quadrupole moment. Multiple antenna wire crossings can be used to create an antenna with non-zero dipole and quadrupole moments centered on the cylindrical axis of a resistivity tool.
[0143]
wherein I is the distance between the two straight wire hole sections (l/2 is the radius of antenna sub cylinder minus the depth of the centerline of a ferrite rod from the sub surface), d is the dipole moment of a ferrite rod construct in the direction of the rod (X direction in coordinate system 133), and N is the total number of cross-axial ferrite rods in the two straight sections and is assumed to be even. All other components of the quadrupole are zero.
[0144] In some embodiments, another wire crossing similar to wire crossing 132 in
[0145] In prior art, the orientation of a wire hole section is important because a single wire segment in the section induces current around the wire hole structure and the induced current becomes an active part of an antenna. Antenna structures using embodiments described herein do not have strict requirements on the orientation of wire holes since there are two wire segments in a wire hole and the net current of the two segments is zero. Wire segments in wire holes do not participate in the transmitting or receiving function of an antenna built within embodiments described herein. The angle at which a wire segment crossing or passing through a ferrite rod may influence an antenna's behavior. Hereafter, unless specified otherwise it is assumed that a wire passes over/under a ferrite rod at a right angle to the major axis of the ferrite rod.
[0146] The two wire segments in a wire hole can be twisted a number of complete turns without altering the polarity of dipoles. A half-turn twist crosses the two wire segments and causes a polarity change in adjacent slots. It is understood that two wire segments maybe twisted in a wire hole to minimize any magnetic moment from the two segments.
[0147] Referring to
[0148] The electronic control unit 166 may connect to the rest of the downhole system via a connection system 169. The electronic control unit 166 may include a directional sensing subsystem. The transceiver electronics system 165 and antennas 175 and 176 may be housed in different sections of drill collars. Hereinafter, the collection of all the sections of drill collars for housing all the components of a resistivity tool may be called a drill collar segment.
[0149] It should also be understood that embodiments described herein also describe that wherein passing over/under a ferrite rod in a slot, a wire may wrap around the rod one or more times before leaving the slot. Wire twisting in a wire hole and wire wrapping of a ferrite rod in a slot may not change that the net current in a wire hole is zero and the net current forms complete loops around a ferrite rod.
[0150] Furthermore a ferrite or a ferrite rod may be made of a single volume of magnetic material or may consist of several pieces linearly concatenated together or packed in parallel.
[0151] While some embodiments have been shown and described, various modifications and substitutions may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
[0152] Techniques for providing one or more antennae within a drilling assembly are disclosed in the following references, which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety: [0153] U.S. Pat. No. 5,001,675 (March 1991), Woodward; [0154] U.S. Pat. No. 5,138,263 (August 1992), Towle; [0155] U.S. Pat. No. 5,331,331 (July 1994), Wu; [0156] U.S. Pat. No. 5,491,488 (February 1996), Wu; [0157] U.S. Pat. No. 5,530,358 (June 1996), Wisler, et al.; [0158] U.S. Pat. No. 6,181,138 (January 2001), Hagiwara; [0159] U.S. Pat. No. 6,163,155 (December 2000), Bittar; [0160] U.S. Pat. No. 8,378,908 (February 2013), Wisler, et al.; [0161] U.S. Pat. No. 8,471,563 (June 2013), Wisler, et al.; [0162] U.S. Pat. No. 8,604,796 (December 2013), Wisler, et al.; [0163] U.S. Pat. No. 9,140,817 (September 2015), Wisler, et al.; [0164] U.S. Pat. No. 9,366,780 (June 2016), Wisler, et al.; and, [0165] U.S. Pat. No. 9,885,800 (February 2018), Wisler, et al.