OCT-BASED, SPATIALLY RESOLVED TRANSMISSION MEASUREMENT OF THE EYE
20230000341 · 2023-01-05
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61B3/10
HUMAN NECESSITIES
G01B9/02091
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
A method for measuring at least one parameter indicative of the optical transmission quality of the eye, such as information on absorptive or scattering structures that affect the propagation of light between the cornea and the retina and/or information on the imaging quality, e.g., the point-spread-function of the eye. The method includes recording a plurality of optical coherence tomography A-scans for different cornea locations xi, yi of the eye by an optical coherence tomography device and a scanner. For each A-scan, a reflection value at the retina of the eye is determined. The reflection values can then be combined, e.g., for displaying an image of the eye's transmission quality as a function of xi, yi or, by Fourier analysis, for determining the point spread function of the eye.
Claims
1. A method for measuring at least one parameter indicative of an optical transmission quality of an eye, said method comprising: recording a plurality of optical coherence tomography A-scans for different cornea locations xi, yi of said eye, for each of said A-scans, identifying a reflection value ri at the retina of the eye, determining the parameter(s) using said reflection values ri and said locations xi, yi.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of A-scans includes a first plurality of A-scans having mutually parallel direction of incidence.
3. Tic method of claim. 2, wherein said parallel direction of incidence is parallel to an eye's visual axis.
4. The method of claim 2, comprising a second plurality of A-scans having mutually parallel direction of incidence, wherein the directions of incidence of the first plurality differs from the direction of incidence of the second plurality.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of A-scans includes a plurality of A-scans that do not overlap at a cornea of the eye.
6. The method of claim 1, comprising focusing probe beams for at least part of said A-scans at an anterior part of the eye.
7. The method of claim 1, comprising focusing probe beams for at least part of said A-scans at an a location between a posterior surface of the eye's lens and the eye's retina.
8. The method of claim 1, comprising varying, while recording said plurality of A-scans by probe beams, a focal position of the probe beams, and in particular wherein for a given location xi, yi, at least two A-scans with different focal positions are recorded.
9. The method of claim 1, comprising displaying said reflection values ri as a function of said locations xi, yi.
10. The method of claim 1, comprising: performing a Fourier transform on a dataset based on said reflection values ri and deriving said parameter from a result of the Fourier transform.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein said Fourier transform is a two-dimensional Fourier transform.
12. The methods of claim 1, comprising at least one of: determining an axial length of the eye from said A-scans by optical coherence tomography, and/or determining a diameter of the pupil from said A-scans by optical coherence tomography.
13. The method of claim 10 comprising at least one of: determining an axial length of the eye from said scans by means of optical coherence tomography, and determining a diameter of the pupil from said A-scans by means of optical coherence tomography and further comprising using at least said axial length and/or said diameter for estimating an absolute size of a point-spread-function of the eye.
14. The method of claim 1, comprising determining, from said A-scans, a topology of at least one structure of the eye, in particular of the cornea, the iris, an anterior surface of the lens, and/or a posterior surface of the lens.
15. The method of claim 14, comprising: determining the at least one parameter using the reflection values ri and the topology of the structure in ray tracing calculus.
16. The method of claim 1, wherein said optical coherence tomography is Frequency-domain OCT, and in particular swept-source OCT.
17. The method of claim 1, comprising determining, using said reflection values ri, a one- or two-dimensional representation of a point-spread-function of the eye.
18. The method of claim 1, comprising determining, using said reflection values ri, at least one of a location and a spatial extent of absorbing and/or scattering structures in the anterior segment of the eye.
19. An ophthalmologic device comprising an optical coherence tomography interferometer, and a control unit structured and adapted to carry out the method of any of the claim 1.
20. The method of claim 18, further comprising representing the location or spatial extend, respectively, as an image in xi-yi-space.
21. The method of claim 1, wherein said plurality of A-scans includes a first plurality of A-scans having mutually parallel direction of incidence as they impinge on the cornea.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0042] The invention will be better understood and objects other than those set forth above will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description thereof. Such description makes reference to the annexed drawings, wherein:
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050] (Note: All grayscale images in the figures have been half-toned for better reproducibility. Half-toning is typically not used when representing the images on an electronic display.)
MODES FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0051] Device Overview
[0052] The ophthalmologic device of
[0053] It comprises an optical coherence tomography interferometer 10-26.
[0054] The interferometer has a light source 10, which, in the present embodiment, is a swept-source light source, i.e. it generates narrowband light that can be adjusted in wavelength.
[0055] The light from light source 10 passes a beam splitter 12, in particular a fiber beam splitter, and is sent into two interferometer arms 14, 16.
[0056] The first arm is the reference arm 14, which comprises a collimating lens 17 and mirror 18 at one end. Light impinging on mirror 18 is sent back into beam splitter 12 and from there, at least in part, to a light detector 20.
[0057] The second arm is the sample arm 16. It comprises collimation optics 22 for collimating the probe light coming from beam splitter 12. The light is then fed through two scanner mirrors 24a, 24b and an objective lens 26 for generating a probe beam 28. Depending on the position of the scanner mirrors 24a, 24b, probe beam 28 can be laterally offset in an x-y-plane perpendicular to the optical axis z of the device.
[0058] In the present embodiment, an interferometer generating telecentric probe beams 28 is used, i.e. the probe beams 28 for various x- and y-coordinates (such as beam 28 and beam 28′ in
[0059] In the shown embodiment, the probe beams are shown to be focused on the anterior surface of the cornea, but they may also be focused on any other part of the eye 30 that is of particular interest. For the reasons mentioned above, the probe beams are advantageously focused on the anterior segment of the eye.
[0060] The focusing optics, e.g. the position and/or the power of lenses 22 and/or 26, may be adjustable to vary the position of the focus along the z-direction.
[0061] Probe beam 28 enters eye 30, where it is reflected or scattered by the structures of the eye. Light cast back from such structures is returned to beam splitter 12, where it can interfere with the light from reference arm 14, and from there, at least in part, to light detector 20.
[0062] The device of
[0063] Spectral analysis, in particular a Fourier transform, of the signal from detector 20 can then be used for generating the reflection values of eye 30 along axis z for the given A-scan. Reflection values are meant to relate to reflected and scattered light as described above. As customary in OCT imaging, reflection values might be represented by values proportional to the reflected intensity or by values proportional to a logarithm of the reflected intensity or e.g. by other range-compressed values. In more general terms, a “reflection value” is indicative of the amount of light returned from a certain position along an A-scan. Advantageously, it may be linear to the amount of light or a logarithm thereof or any other function thereof.
[0064] This type of OCT measurement is known to the skilled person, and it is e.g. described in EP 3572765 and the references cited therein.
[0065] The device further comprises a control unit 32, which may e.g. be provided with a microprocessor 34a and with a memory 34b as well as with a display 34c. Memory 34b may hold the data as well as the program instructions required for carrying out the steps of the present method. Display 34c may e.g. be used for showing the data determined thereby and in particular for displaying plots or images as described below.
[0066] Advantageously, the measuring range (for a single A-scan) of the OCT interferometer 10-26 extends at least from the cornea to the retina of a typical eye. In other words, with a single A-scan (i.e. for an SS-OCT with a single sweep of the light source), depth-resolved information over at least 40 mm (in air) can be obtained. This allows to apply the techniques described in the following to be used over the whole axial eye length without the need to e.g. apply stitching for combining different measurements.
[0067]
[0068] A-Scan Analysis
[0069]
[0070] As known to the skilled person, the various structures of the eye generate different peaks in the reflection values corresponding to different depths z1, z2, z3 . . . A first major peak at a depth z1 may e.g. correspond to the (anterior surface of) the cornea 36, a second peak at z2 to the anterior surface 40 of the lens 38, a next peak at z3 to the posterior surface 42 of the lens 38, and a last peak at z4 to the retina 44.
[0071] The A-scans recorded in this manner can optionally be corrected for eye motion, e.g. by using at least the following steps: [0072] 1. Identifying reflections of at least one given eye-structure (such as the anterior corneal surface) in the A-scans. [0073] 2. Fitting a model descriptive of the shape of the structure and of the motion of the structure to the locations of the identified reflections. This model can e.g. have geometric parameters (such as the curvature) of the structure as well as motion parameters (such as the three-dimensional location and velocity in x-, y-, and z-coordinates).
[0074] The parameters obtained in the fitting step 2 can then be used for translating the OCT measurements, and in particular the incident coordinates xi, yi as well as the z-coordinates obtained from the A-scan, into a coordinate system that is fixed with the frame of the eye.
[0075] Suitable motion correction techniques are e.g. described in WO 2013/107649 or U.S. Pat. No. 7,452,077.
[0076] These steps allow to determine the location of various structures in the eye, such as cornea 36, the anterior and/or posterior surfaces 40, 42 of lens 38, and/or the anterior surface of the iris 46 and to identify their reflection values.
[0077] Transmission Analysis
[0078] As mentioned above, a reflection value of particular interest is the reflection value ri corresponding to the reflection of the probe beam of A-scan i at the retina 44.
[0079] This reflection value ri can e.g. be obtained by one of the following methods: [0080] Determining a maximum of the reflection values in a region R around the expected z-location of the retina; [0081] Integrating the reflection values over a given region R around the expected or determined z-location z4 of the retina. (The z-location of the retina may e.g. be determined from the z-location of the maximum reflection value in an expected z-location range R of the retina. [0082] Fitting a model of a typical retina reflection to the reflection values at the expected z-location range R of the retina.
[0083] A more robust reflection value r′i can be obtained by combining values ri1, ri2, . . . , rin, of n A-scans i at points xi1/yi1, xi2/yi2, . . . xin/yin, having mutual distances smaller than a threshold d, e.g. with d<1 mm, <0.5 mm or <0.25 mm, by means of e.g. calculating an average, median, or weighted average of ri, ri2, . . . , rin.
[0084] The reflection value ri obtained in this manner is not only a function of the reflectivity of the retina but also a function of the transmission of the eye along the path of probe beam 28.
[0085] Hence, if the eye comprises scattering and/or absorbing structures along the path of probe beam 28, the reflection value ri decreases.
[0086] In a typical measurement, a plurality of A-scans i with i=1 . . . N (with N being at least 10, in particular at least 100, advantageously at least 1000) is performed.
[0087] Advantageously, the directions of incidence D of the probe beams outside the eye are parallel to each other and, advantageously, parallel to the eye's visual axis A.
[0088] For parallel probe beams 28, 28′ and an eye accommodated to infinity, the probe beams will all hit the retina 44 at a common location 48 (corresponding to the fovea if the direction of incidence of the A-scans outside the eye correspond to the eye's visual axis A).
[0089] Hence, the difference between reflection values ri for the retina for these two A-scans will primarily be due to the eye's different transmission for the two probe beams 28, 28′.
[0090] In other words, the reflection values ri of the retina describe how the transmission of the eye varies as a function of A-scan location xi, yi.
[0091] If, for example, there are local, scattering or absorbing structures 50a-50f in the anterior section of the eye, they can be detected and spatially resolved (at least in the directions x and y if not necessarily along z) by reviewing the reflection values ri as a function of scan location xi, yi.
[0092] For example, these structures may include scattering or absorbing structures 50a-50c at the posterior surface of the lens or scattering and/or absorbing structures 50d-50f in the anterior half of the eye behind the lens.
[0093] This is illustrated in
[0094] In each image, the pupil can be recognized easily. Positions where the A-scan hits the iris have low reflection values ri from the retina and are, therefore, white.
[0095] Eye C of
[0096] Eyes A, B, and D show eyes where the transmission is impaired for some locations xi, yi, which is indicative of defects in the eye's anterior region.
[0097] It must be noted that the present techniques allows to detect not only scattering but also absorbing structures. The latter are notoriously hard to detect by other methods.
[0098] PSF Analysis
[0099] An analysis of the reflection values ri as a function of xi, yi allows to obtain an estimate of the eye's PSF.
[0100] The relevant techniques are e.g. described in Goodman J W, “Introduction to Fourier optics”, 2.sup.nd edition (1996).
[0101] In particular, and assuming that the eye's lens and cornea provide perfect imaging only impaired by defects 50a-50f in the eye's anterior section, the PSF can be calculated by the Fourier transform FT of the modulation transfer function MTF of the anterior eye, i.e.
PSF=FT(MTF) (1)
[0102] The modulation transfer function can be estimated from the reflection values ri(xi, yi) as obtained by the measurements described in the section “PSF analysis” above. Advantageously the MTF is interpolated to a regular 2D grid since this allows to use the efficient FFT algorithm to perform the FT.
[0103] In particular, and in good approximation
PSF(u,v)=FT(ri(θxi, θyi)) (2)
with θxi, θyi being the angles of propagation on the posterior side of the lens, of probe beam for A-scan i and u, v being retina coordinates. The angles θxi, θyi are measured in to the axis A of the eye.
[0104]
[0105]
[0106] For a quantitative analysis, the values θxi, θyi can be calculated from xi, yi using the axial length L of the eye. In this context, this axial length L may be defined as the distance, along axis A, between the center of lens 38 and retina 44. Alternatively, it may e.g. be defined as the distance, along axis A, between any other part of lens 38 and retina 44 or the distance between the apex of cornea 36 and retina 44.
[0107] In particular, the values θxi, θyi can be calculated using ray tracing techniques.
[0108] This axial length L of the eye can easily be determined from the OCT A-scans by determining the positions of the respective peaks in the A-scan spectra. In the example of
[0109] Hence, the present method advantageously comprises the step of using the axial length L in order to estimate a parameter descriptive of the absolute size of the PSF, such as a half-width of the PSF in horizontal and/or vertical direction.
[0110] In addition, for a quantitative analysis, the absolute values of xi, yi need to be known, e.g. from one or more of the following sources: [0111] The scanning optics 24a, 24b may be calibrated to yield known displacements in respect to the axis of the system. In this case, absolute values of xi, yi can be derived from the settings of the scanning optics 24a, 24b for a given A-scan i. [0112] In the OCT measurements, reflections from the iris can be identified, which allows to measure the diameter d of the iris (see e.g.
[0113] Alternatively to calculating the Fourier transform of a dataset derived from ri(xi, yi), ray tracing can be used for determining at least one parameter of the eye, such as one or more parameters describing the PSF of the eye.
[0114] Such ray tracing can be based e.g. on the following steps: [0115] Measuring, by means of OCT, the geometry of least some of the refractive structures of the eye. Advantageously, this includes measuring the geometry of the anterior and posterior surface of cornea 36, anterior lens surface 40, and posterior lens surface 42. [0116] Using ray tracing, taking into account the geometries measured by the previous step, to calculate the intensity distribution at the location of retina 44 generated by the superposition of a plurality of ideal beams parallel to direction D: In a raytracing simulation, a set of parallel and evenly distributed beams can be assumed, that covers the cornea of the measured eye. The trajectory of each beam is calculated as it passes through the eye until it reaches the retina, by calculating the new beam axis caused refraction at each optical interface (anterior and posterior cornea, anterior and posterior lens) using Snell's law and refractive indices known from literature (e.g. the eye model of Le Grand, values can be found in Atchison D A and Smith G, “Optics of the Human Eye”,). If sufficient beams are used in this simulation, the density distribution of the points where those beams cross the retinal surface provides a good approximation of the PSF of the eye for the axis of incidence of the simulated beams.
[0117] For each simulated beam, a transmission value is determined based on one or more of the reflection values ri, assuming that the reflection values ri are e.g. proportional to the transmission at the points xi, yi, and xi, yi are in vicinity of the coordinates of the simulated beam (e.g. having a distance of less than 10 spot sizes). This transmission value ri (or a composite value r′i) can be used as weighting factor for that particular simulated beam. The PSF resulting from such a simulation represents the optical imaging quality of the eye including effects of aberrations and obstructions (scattering and/or absorption).
[0118] The simulation can be further improved by taking into account the angle of incidence of each beam with respect to the retina and weighting each beam according to the Stiles-Crawford effect (Stiles and Crawford 1933), i.e. the angle-dependence of the retinal sensitivity.
[0119] Techniques for carrying out such ray tracing calculus are e.g. described in: [0120] 1) Spencer G, Murty M, “General ay-Tracing Procedure, Journal of the Optical Society of America, Vol. 5, Issue 6, Page 672 (1962), DOI: 10.1364/JOSA.52.000672 [0121] 2) Einighammer J, “The Individual Virtual Eye”, Dissertation at Univ. Tübingen (2008), Chapter 3.2.3, http://hdl.handle.net/10900/49149, and references therein. [0122] 3): Einighammer J et al., “The individual virtual eye: a computer model for advanced intraocular lens calculation”, J Optom 2009; 2:70-82, https://doi.org/10.3921/joptom.2009.70 and references therein.
[0123] The eye's PSF can e.g. be directly displayed to the operator using graphs as shown in
[0124] Notes
[0125] Advantageously, the A-scans used for measuring the parameter includes plurality of A-scans, advantageously at least 10 A-scans, in particular at least 100 A-scans, that have mutual distances, at the cornea, of at least 1 mm, i.e. a macroscopic region of the eye is examined.
[0126] In particular, the plurality of A-scans is distributed over the whole pupil of the eye, which allows to measure the transmission over the whole pupil. The distribution can be even or irregular. Advantageously, it has a resolution of at least ten points horizontally (i.e. along x) as well as vertically (along y).
[0127] In the embodiments above, the A-scans i all have the same direction of incidence, i.e. they are, before entering the cornea, parallel to direction D, which is advantageously parallel to the optical or visual axis A of the eye.
[0128] In another embodiment, probe beams having different directions of incidence can be used.
[0129] For example, a first plurality of A-scans for probe beams having mutually parallel directions of incidence, along a first direction (e.g. D), can be recorded. In addition, a second plurality of A-scans for probe beams having mutually parallel directions of incidence along a second direction (e.g. D′ in
[0132] In yet another embodiment, the focal position of the probe beams can be varied while recording the A-scans. For example, for a given location xi, yi, at least two A-scans with different focal positions may be recorded. Since the spatial resolution for defects 50a-50f is best at the focal plane of the probe beams, this allows to e.g. focus the measurement on a specific region of the eye and/or to gain more information about the z-position of given defects.
[0133] The present techniques can be used with any kind of OCT, in particular for time-domain OCT as well as frequency-domain OCT. Frequency-domain OCT, and in particular swept-source OCT, is, however, advantageous for its ability to obtain an A-scan quickly.
[0134] While there are shown and described presently preferred embodiments of the invention, it is to be distinctly understood that the invention is not limited thereto but may be otherwise variously embodied and practiced within the scope of the following claims.