ROPE SLING SHACKLE BODY

Abstract

The invention relates to a rope sling shackle body for a heavy load rope sling shackle for suspending on a rope sling, at least comprising: two mutually opposite end portions each with a through-opening for receiving a pin; a central arc which extends between the end portions and which has, at least in a rope receiving region, an arc bottom and arc flanks that are arranged on either side thereof and are spaced apart from one another, wherein the arc has a convexly rounded rope supporting face on its inner side at least in the rope receiving region, said rope supporting face extending from a top edge of one arc flank to the top edge of the respectively other arc flank; and at least one reinforcement rib, which is arranged between the arc flanks. The reinforcement rib is divided into two part-ribs via which in each case one arc flank is supported on the arc bottom, wherein there is a spacing between the part-ribs right down to the arc bottom.

Claims

1. A rope sling shackle body for a heavy-duty rope sling shackle for attachment to a rope sling, comprising: two opposed end portions each having a through-opening for receiving a bolt (30); and a central arc that extends between the end sections and that, at least in a rope-receiving region, further comprises: an are base and arc flanks arranged on both sides thereon and spaced apart from one another, wherein the arc has a convexly curved rope support area at least in the rope-receiving region on its inner side, extending from an upper edge of one arc flank to the upper edge of the respective other arc flank; and at least one reinforcing rib arranged between the arc flanks, wherein the reinforcing rib is divided into two partial ribs, via each of which an arc flank is supported on the arc base, there being a distance between the partial ribs down to the arc base.

2. The rope sling shackle body of claim 1, wherein the partial ribs extend upwards beyond the upper edges of the arc flanks and each having at least one receiving opening on the protruding part.

3. The rope sling shackle body of claim 2, wherein the arc flanks and the arc base together form a torus inner ring section in the rope-receiving region.

4. The rope sling shackle body of claim 2, wherein the inner edges of the partial ribs facing each other are formed in a straight line.

5. The rope sling shackle body of claim 4, wherein the arc flanks and the arc base together form a torus inner ring section in the rope-receiving region.

6. The rope sling shackle body of claim 1, wherein the inner edges of the partial ribs facing each other are formed in a straight line.

7. The rope sling shackle body of claim 6, wherein the arc flanks and the arc base together form a torus inner ring section in the rope-receiving region.

8. The rope sling shackle body of claim 1, wherein the arc flanks and the arc base together form a torus inner ring section in the rope-receiving region.

9. A rope sling shackle for attaching a rope sling, comprising: at least one rope sling shackle body of claim 1; and a bolt that can be inserted into the through-openings, the bolt further comprising a head at a first end and a threaded portion at a second end, wherein the second end receives a locking nut.

10. A rope sling shackle for attaching a rope sling, comprising: at least one rope sling shackle body of claim 2; and a bolt that can be inserted into the through-openings, the bolt further comprising a head at a first end and a threaded portion at a second end, wherein the second end receives a locking nut.

Description

[0009] The invention is explained in greater detail based on an exemplary embodiment and with reference to the drawings. The Figures show in detail:

[0010] FIG. 1 a section through a rope sling shackle body from the front;

[0011] FIG. 2 a section through the rope sling shackle body in a side view;

[0012] FIG. 3 a heavy-duty shackle with a bolt in front view;

[0013] FIG. 4 the deformation of a rope sling shackle body with laterally acting loads according to the invention, in view from above; and

[0014] FIG. 5 the deformation of a rope sling shackle body according to the prior art with laterally acting loads, in view from above.

[0015] FIG. 1 shows a rope sling shackle body 10 sectioned, in front view in a sectional plane located in the area of the vertical axis. The rope sling shackle body 10 essentially consists of an arc body 15 and two parallel end sections 11, 12, each of which has a through hole 13, 14 for receiving a shackle bolt. The upper area of the shackle arc 15, which forms a rope-receiving region 16, is horseshoe-shaped and rounded. This means that the load direction defined by the point of attack of a rope sling can lie not only vertically and centrally on the vertical axis, but also eccentrically and obliquely to it, as indicated by the block arrows.

[0016] The shackle arc 15 comprises an arc base 15.2 and two arc flanks at a distance from each other, one arc flank 15.2 of which is visible behind the section plane in FIG. 1. A partial rib 17.1 is formed only exactly on the vertical axis and fills the groove between the arc base 15.2 and the arc flank 15.1.

[0017] As the cross-sectional drawing of the rope sling shackle body 10 with a rope sling 200 in FIG. 2 shows, the cross-section in that part of the shackle arc 15 that forms the rope-receiving region 16 is strongly rounded. The sectional drawing in FIG. 2 clearly shows that the cross-sectional area has the shape of half an annular ring, so that arc flanks 15.1, 15.3 and arc base 15.2 merge smoothly and continuously into each other. The circular arc in the cross-section of the rope-receiving region 16 extends across at least 180, in particular across 200.

[0018] On the upper side of the shackle arc 15 facing outwards, a groove is formed which is bridged selectively by the partial ribs 17.1, 17.2, whereby the partial ribs 17.1, 17.2, however, only reach down to the bottom of the arc 15.2 towards the center.

[0019] The partial ribs 17.1, 17.2 extend beyond the upper edges 15.4, 15.5 of the arc flanks 15.1, 15.3 upwards and each have at least one receiving opening 18.1, 18.2 at the protruding portion. A smaller shackle can be attached to this, via which the rope sling shackle body 10 itself can be lifted, e.g. to attach it to a rope sling. Further receiving openings are provided at the transition of the shackle arc 15 into the end regions 11, 12.

[0020] FIG. 3 shows a fully assembled rope sling shackle 100 with a shackle bolt 30 with a head 31 and a thread section 32 inserted in the end sections 11, 12. A lock nut 40 is screwed onto the thread section 32. A cotter pin 42 is inserted at an end shoulder 34 to secure the nut 40.

[0021] FIG. 4 shows a view of the shackle arc 15 from above. The dashed lines set the course of the arc edges 15.4, 15.5 in an exaggerated manner for clarification in a deformation as caused by an eccentrically acting load represented by the block arrows. The opposite arc edges 15.4, 15.5 can move unhindered towards each other in the area of the load action by a rope sling located there. To the left there is a very gradual and steady decrease in deformation.

[0022] For comparison, a prior art rope sling shackle 10 with a continuous reinforcing rib 17 in the middle is shown in FIG. 5. Its cross-section in the area of a shackle arc 15 also includes a central arc base 15.2 and laterally adjoining arc flanks 15.1, 15.3. As soon as a rope sling acts obliquely to the vertical axis, i.e. laterally outside the area of a reinforcing rib 17, which directly connects the two arc flanks 15.1, 15.3 to each other, the cross-section is loaded by additional superimposed stresses.

[0023] While the two arc flanks according to the invention could move towards each other under load by elastic deformation, according to the prior art this is prevented or at least impeded by the centrally arranged reinforcing rib 17. This results in additional and differently oriented stresses, especially in the area marked X next to the reinforcing rib 17. The rope sling shackle body 10 is therefore effectively subjected to a higher load with an obliquely acting load than if it had no reinforcing rib 17 at all.