COMBINED TREATMENT PROCESS FOR REMOVING AND INHIBITING SCALE

Abstract

The present invention proposes a combined treatment of scale removal and inhibition in reservoir rock (inhibition squeeze), by using inhibitors derived from organophosphonic acid, in acidic medium, aiming at minimizing the intervention time in well scale mitigation operations, in addition to reducing costs per treatment and the risks associated with the process.

Claims

1- A COMBINED TREATMENT PROCESS FOR REMOVING AND INHIBITING SCALE, characterized in that there is the combination of two distinct treatments in just a single treatment (removal and inhibition), minimizing the intervention time in producing wells.

2- THE COMBINED TREATMENT PROCESS FOR REMOVING AND INHIBITING SCALE according to claim 1, characterized in that there is the use of a treatment solution based on inhibitors derived from organophosphonic acid, in acidic medium, which acts in the dissolution of the scale of calcium carbonate and the inhibition of the fluid produced.

3- A COMBINED TREATMENT METHOD FOR REMOVING AND INHIBITING SCALE, characterized in that it comprises the following steps: a. Conditioning of the producing well to receive the injection of the treatment fluid that acts in the dissolution of the scale; b. Injection and positioning of the treatment fluid in the reservoir; c. Closing of the producing well for a period of around 24 hours to allow the interaction of the treatment fluid with the reservoir rock; d. Opening and return of the well production with collection of samples of the produced fluid; e. Chemical analysis of the produced aqueous fluid; f. Well test to evaluate the new production conditions (damage removal and obstruction removal throughout the production system), inhibition, and treatment lifetime as a function of inhibitor release curve.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

[0016] The present invention will be described in more detail below, with reference to the attached figures which, in a schematic form and not limiting the inventive scope, represent examples of its embodiment. In the drawings, there are:

[0017] FIG. 1 illustrating a laboratory test with injection of inhibitor fluid in carbonate rock sample with porous volume defined as Vp. The calcium concentration was obtained by analyzing the effluent using the ICP-OES technique (optical emission spectroscopy with inductively coupled plasma source). The calcium concentration curves are presented as a function of the number of porous volumes of injected inhibitor fluid (Vp) for the EABMP inhibitors (amino bimethylene phosphonic acid, aqueous solution 10% v/v) and commercial phosphonate, in the retention process of these inhibitors in the porous medium.

[0018] FIG. 2 illustrating the release of organophosphonic acid (inhibitor) in the aqueous stream, after the main treatment, showing a laboratory test with the injection of formation water, in a sample of carbonate rock with porous volume defined as Vp. Phosphorus concentration was obtained by analyzing the effluent using the ICP-OES technique (optical emission spectroscopy with inductively coupled plasma source). The phosphorus concentration curves are presented as a function of the number of porous volumes of injected formation water, showing the release to the aqueous medium of the organophosphonic inhibitors, previously retained in the rock.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0019] Upon taking the limitations found in the State of the Art into account, the solution addressed in the present invention comprises a combined treatment of scale removal and inhibition (inhibition squeeze) in reservoir rock, using an inhibitor derived from organophosphonic acid in acidic medium. Considering the limitations found in the State of the Art, the solution addressed to in the present invention comprises a combined treatment of removal and inhibition of scale (inhibition squeeze) in reservoir rock, using an inhibitor derived from organophosphonic acid in an acidic medium. The present invention will now be described in detail with reference to the above-mentioned Figures, which in no way signify or represent restrictions that may be imposed on the inventive scope claimed herein.

Example 1: Permeability Analysis

[0020] The intensity and extent of the dissolution of the reservoir rock sample was evaluated by verifying the change in the permeability of the sample caused by the treatment with different inhibitors, as can be seen in Table 1.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of permeabilities pre- and post-main treatment (dissolution by inhibitor) and evaluation of permeability damage. ATMP EABMP COMMERCIAL 10% m/v 10% v/v PHOSPHONATE Initial effective permeability 0.38 0.18 0.75 to water - Kw (mD) Initial Effective Permeability 3.56 2.39 3.59 to Oil - initial Ko (mD) Final Effective Permeability 442.59 0.80 0.65 to water - Kwf (mD) Final Effective Permeability 89.16 4.89 3.48 to Oil - Kof (mD) Initial irreducible water 32.90 26.50 N/A saturation - Swi % Initial residual oil saturation - 33.00 0.29 N/A Ros % Final irreducible water N/A 28.46 N/A saturation - Swif % Final residual oil saturation - N/A N/A N/A Rosf % Stimulation in relation to Kw 1164.70 4.57 0.87 Stimulation in relation to Ko 25.04 2.05 0.97 Kw—Initial effective permeability to water Ko—Initial Effective Permeability to Oil Kwf—Final Effective Permeability to water Kof—Final Effective Permeability to Oil Swi—Initial irreducible water saturation Ros—Initial residual oil saturation Ros—Initial residual oil saturation Swif—Final irreducible water saturation N/A—Not determined

[0021] FIG. 1 shows that the dissolution of carbonate rock occurs due to the increase in the concentration of calcium in the aqueous medium, during the process of injection and retention of the inhibitor in the rock. The permeability analyses in Table 1 corroborate that the treatment in which there was greater intensity in the dissolution of the calcium carbonate sample was the one that contained ATMP as active matter, since it has a greater amount of phosphonic acid groups, requiring a greater amount of calcium carbonate to neutralize the same. This analysis also evidenced the higher dissolution capacity of EABMP compared to a commercial phosphonate. The commercial phosphonate did not present sufficient dissolution efficiency for the proposed combined treatment, with no increase in permeability after treatment (stimulation).

Example 2: Analysis of Retention and Release of Scale Inhibiting Active Matter

[0022] As can be seen in FIG. 2, curves were obtained to evaluate the retention of the scale inhibitor during the injection of the solution (main treatment).

[0023] The inhibitor solution that contained the EABMP molecule showed satisfactory behavior of dissolution of carbonates, retention in the rock, and release above the minimum effective concentration to inhibit the precipitation of carbonates in the aqueous medium, as evidenced by the concentration of phosphorus in the effluent. As the acid treatment dissolves the calcium carbonate rock sample while retaining the scale-inhibiting molecule, large amounts of calcium carbonate are solubilized in the aqueous medium, increasing the concentration of calcium ion (Ca.sup.2+) in solution.

[0024] Since the ATMP molecule in the presence of Ca.sup.2+ ions forms a Ca-ATMP complex of low solubility, precipitating in the pores of the rock sample, it was not possible to obtain the phosphorus concentration curve in the effluent as a function of the porous volume of water from injected formation to evaluate the release of ATMP phosphonate in the aqueous phase.

[0025] In FIG. 2, when analyzing the curve from the moment the injection starts to the point where the inhibitor completely saturates the medium (the reactivity of the medium tends to equilibrium), it is noted that there was a retention of the inhibitor in the porous medium during sample dissolution.

Example 3: Scale Inhibitor Release Analysis

[0026] In addition, the release of the scale inhibitor was evaluated in the flow experiment in a porous medium. After the squeeze treatment, the inhibitor was released into the fluid stream during production, inhibiting scale formation for a certain period of time. The objective was to determine the scale inhibition potential of the used solutions containing organophosphonic acids, after the dissolution of a calcium carbonate rock sample, simulating the reopening of the well for production.

[0027] The experiments with EABMP and commercial phosphonate showed potential to inhibit scale, and were gradually released into the aqueous fluid stream. In the experiment that contained ATMP as active matter, there was precipitation of the Ca-ATMP complex in the porous medium, and the inhibitor release curve was not obtained with the injection of formation water into the rock.

[0028] In both experiments with EABMP and commercial phosphonate, the inhibitor concentration remained above the Minimum Inhibitor Concentration (MIC) required for inhibition. Accordingly, these inhibitors are therefore effective in inhibiting calcium carbonate throughout its useful life (release into the aqueous stream).

[0029] The experiment that contained commercial phosphonate in the composition of the main treatment solution had a significant useful life, demonstrating potential to inhibit scale over a certain period of time. However, the commercial phosphonate showed unsatisfactory dissolution for the proposed combined treatment.

[0030] The EABMP was efficient in the combined and simultaneous treatment (using a single fluid) of dissolution and inhibition of calcium carbonate scale. There were observed the efficient dissolution, retention and subsequent release of the inhibitor to the aqueous stream at a concentration above the minimum required one, without causing damage, and stimulating the porous rock. The proposed process can be expanded to other classes of organophosphonic acids (phosphonates) that are tolerant to precipitation in the presence of high concentrations of Ca.sup.2+ ion.

[0031] It should be noted that, although the present invention has been described in relation to the attached figures, it may undergo modifications and adaptations by technicians skilled on the subject, depending on the specific situation, but provided that it is within the inventive scope defined herein.