Face mask with seal within seal and optional bridging seal
10674776 ยท 2020-06-09
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
A41D13/1176
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A41D13/11
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A62B23/025
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A41D13/11
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A62B18/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
Abstract
The present face mask may have a double seal, a triple seal or a quadruple seal, with distinct spacing between each of the seals within a set of seals. Each of the seals within a double seal, triple seal, or quadruple seal may stand alone or may be interconnected to other seals by bridging, where such bridging is formed of the same adhesive as the seal itself. Also disclosed is an after market embodiment where a multiple seal by itself is housed between two sheets of release paper to be applied to a face mask by the user himself when needed. Further disclosed is a multiple seal with bridging applied to a clothing combination, such as to seal sleeve cuffs to a glove.
Claims
1. A multiple seal arrangement for a periphery of a respirator, comprising: a) a first endless skin adhesive seal; b) a second endless skin adhesive seal, the second endless skin adhesive seal being spaced from the first endless skin adhesive seal, and the second endless skin adhesive seal confronting the first endless adhesive seal; and c) an endless bridge connection joining the first and second endless skin adhesive seals, the first and second endless skin adhesive seals projecting from the endless bridge connection, the endless bridge connection having an underface on the respirator, each of the first and second endless skin adhesive seals having a distal end, said distal end of said first and second endless skin adhesive seals confronting a face of a user, said distal ends of said first and second endless skin adhesive seals being spaced apart from each other.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(29)
(30) A harness or a pair of rubber or elastomeric bands 22 engages a peripheral portion of the mask 10. One band 22 engages and draws to the face 12 an upper portion of the mask 10. The other band 22 engages and draws to the face 12 a lower portion of the mask 10. Each of the ends of the bands 22 is engaged to the mask 10 via a staple 24 that extends from the exterior 20 to the inside 18.
(31) Mask 10 further includes a bridge strip 26 of bendable material, preferably metal, that engages the outside 20 of the mask 10. Bendable material is little, if at all, resilient. Once bent, material of the bridge strip 26 stays bent. The qualities of the material of bridge strip 26 for a springing back or rebounding to the shape it had prior to being bent are minimized Bridge strip 26 is malleable. The qualities of the material of bridge strip 26 for retaining its shape after being bent are maximized. Bridge strip 26 is pliable. When bridge strip 26 is bent over the nose, bridge strip 26 stays in such uniquely bent shape. As shown in
(32) The periphery 16 of the covering 14 completely surrounds the nostrils and mouth. The periphery 14 is structured to extend from a first position on the bridge of the nose above the nostrils to the right side of the nose, from said right side of the nose to a position on the front of the face beyond the right side of the mouth, from said position beyond the right side of the mouth to one of a first position on the chin and a second position under the chin, from one of said first and second positions to a position on the front of the face beyond the left side of the mouth, from said position beyond the left side of the mouth to the left side of the nose, from said left side of the nose back to said first position on the bridge of the nose such that the nostrils and mouth are completely surrounded.
(33) As shown in
(34) As shown in
(35) As shown in
(36) As shown in
(37) As shown in
(38) As shown in
(39) Covering or filter 14 and covering or filter 14A are structured to permit air into and out of the coverings 14 and 14A. Coverings 14 and 14A are structured to minimize a flow of substances into and out of the coverings 14 and 14A.
(40) As shown in
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45) It should be noted that the set of seals chosen for apparatus 54 may have connections 38 that are contained between the outer and inner seals. In other words, each of the sealing configurations shown in
(46) As to a process for making the seal configurations of the present invention, the endless seals 30, 32, 40 and 42 and the connections 38 may be formed from a pressure sensitive hot melt adhesive and applied in a manufacturing facility. The adhesive may be applied in a fluid viscous form from an apparatus such as a tube or hot glue gun. Then the adhesive is permitted to cool and set to a rubber or rubber like state. Then the release paper or liner 44 is applied over the pressure sensitive hot melt adhesive. Then the face mask 10 is packaged for sale.
(47) The skin adhesive seals may be skin friendly adhesive seals or skin unfriendly adhesive seals. As to skin friendly and skin unfriendly adhesive seals and other seals and adhesives, the Matich U.S. Pat. No. 7,017,577 B2 is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
(48) The adhesive or seal or bead used herein, such as the double, triple, or quadruple seal arrangement or configuration with or without bridges used herein, may include a styrene-olefin-styrene block copolymer.
(49) One adhesive for the multiple seal arrangement of the present invention that may be used is a pressure sensitive hot melt adhesive available from The Glue Factory, An Ellsworth Adhesives Company, of Appleton, Wis. Such adhesive may be used for the double seal with or without bridges, the triple seal with or without bridges and the quadruple seal with or without bridges.
(50) As to the adhesive for the double, triple, or quadruple seal arrangements with or without bridges used herein, the following U.S. Patents are incorporated by reference in their entireties: 1) the Fujisawa et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,330 issued Jul. 17, 2001, 2) the Kitazaki et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,421 issued Oct. 2, 2001, 3) the Takahashi et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,323,275 issued Nov. 27, 2001, 4) the Hechenberger et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,997,861 issued Mar. 5, 1991, 5) the Hickey et al. U.S. Pat. No. 6,310,166 issued Oct. 30, 2001, 6) the Satterfield U.S. Pat. No. 6,179,804 issued Jan. 30, 2001, 7) the Poulsen et al. U.S. Pat. No. 4,367,732 issued Jan. 11, 1983, and 8) the Matich U.S. Pat. No. 7,017,577 B2.
(51)
(52)
(53) As shown in
(54)
(55) Connections or bridges 38 have the advantage of making the seal configurations easier to separate from the release paper 44.
(56) The seal configurations, i.e., one or more of the endless seals 30, 32, 40, 42 and connections 38, may be applied in a hot or cold form to the mask 10 itself and in a hot or cold form to apparatus 54.
(57) The seal configurations provide a uniform fit. That is, a seal configuration with at least one inner seal maximizes the chances that such a seal configuration will fit each of an adult and child's face because, with the multiple seal arrangement, the innermost endless seal or bead has a first relatively small diameter, the subsequent endless seal or bead has a second diameter greater than the first diameter, the subsequent endless seal or bead has a third diameter greater than the second diameter, and the subsequent endless seal or bead has a fourth diameter greater than the third diameter.
(58) The provision of at least one inner seal 32 provides a tortuous path for entry of toxic substances. That is, a toxic substance must confront and find its way through the outer seal 30 and then, if successful, wind its way about the space between the outer and inner seal until it finds an opening in an inner seal 32. The provision of a connection or bridge 38 even further guards against the entry of a toxic substance by blocking such a tortuous path that the toxic substance must take.
(59) The provision of an inner seal 32 provides protection for a maximum number of unique undulating faces. One portion of the outer seal 30 may not perfectly fit a portion of a face. One portion of the inner seal 32 may not perfectly fit a portion of a face. However, in combination, especially with bridges 38, a tortuous path to a maximum degree is provided.
(60) Seals 30, 32, 40 and 42 may not run parallel to each other. In fact, it may be beneficial to provide nonparallel seals 30, 32, 40 and 42.
(61) A face mask or respirator, such as face mask 10, includes a periphery, such as periphery 16, where the face mask filter or covering, such as filter or covering 20 terminates, and where the skin is exposed. The outermost seal of the multiple seal arrangement here, such as the double seal with or without bridges, such as the triple seal with or without bridges, such as the quadruple seal with or without bridges, is preferably placed as close to the absolute periphery as possible without going beyond the periphery. Peripheries of face mask often include flat areas and the beads of adhesive may be placed upon such flat areas.
(62) The peripheral portion of a face mask or respirator may be described as the part of the filter or covering that runs from an absolute periphery to an inner portion spaced from the absolute periphery. This peripheral portion may have elevation differences, or structural differences, or uneven or undulating surfaces, or material or composition differences. These differences may be found as one runs his or her finger endlessly around the peripheral portion. These differences may be found as one runs his or finger radially or in a direction transverse to the endless direction. A multiple seal arrangement of the present invention, where at least two endless beads are independent of each other, or where at least two endless beads are independent of each other except for a few bridges or connections interconnecting the endless beads, maximizes the chances of at least one of the endless beads making a 360 degree connection with the skin of the face. The provision of bridges or connections close off areas where one of the endless seals has not made a 360 degree connection with the skin of the face. Also, it should be noted that the undulating, or the other differences pointed out above, of the peripheral portion of the face mask is compounded by the unique face of an individual, even if the face mask manufacturer has shaped its mask for the shape of a face.
(63) Where connections or bridges 38 are utilized, there may number anywhere from one to about six bridges. There are competing considerations. On the one hand, it may be beneficial to block, one or more times, the tortuous path referred to above. On the other hand, it may be beneficial to keep as much of the seal configuration digging into the skin of the face 12 as possible and, where a great number of connections 38 are present, the amount of digging by distinct beads is reduced.
(64) The location of the bridges 38 are preferably at about the three o'clock, six o'clock and nine o'clock positions. The bridges 38 can be placed equidistant apart if desired. The bridges 38 are preferably placed about the lower half of the mask 10 since this portion of the mask 10 encounters a relatively great amount of movement or flexing because of the opening and closing of the mouth of the user.
(65)
(66)
(67) As shown in
(68)
(69) As shown in
(70)
(71)
(72)
(73)
(74)
(75)
(76) A PortaCount Plus mode 8020 Respirator Fit Tester is a machine manufactured by TSI Inc. of Shoreview, Minn. This PortaCount tester quantitatively measures whether a respirator is donned properly. This PortaCount tester performs a quantitative respirator fit test.
(77) A PortaCount Plus mode 8020 Respirator Fit Tester and N95-Companion brochure available from TSI Inc. of Shoreview, Minn., provides in part the following: The PORTACOUNT makes a direct measurement of respirator fit factors. There are no error-inducing assumptions made to calculate equivalent fit factors. The measurement is made while the person simultaneously performs dynamic moving and/or breathing exercises designed to stress the respirator seal in ways that simulate anticipated workplace motions. The PORTACOUNT eliminates the human variables associated with qualitative methods. Variations in sensitivity to the challenge chemical or lack of cooperation can't influence the test results because the employee makes no decisions. And, unlike other methods, the PORTACOUNT results are immediate and unambiguous. The PORTACOUNT Plus performs the fit test and delivers a pass or fail. It's that easy. The PORTACOUNT has been accepted by OSHA for compliance with all fit testing regulations since 1988. Recent standards, including the new OSHA respiratory protection standard 29 CFR 1910.134, specifically recognize the PORTACOUNT and provide specific protocols. The PORTACOUNT can be used to fit test almost any tight-fitting respirator including elastomeric half- and full-face masks, PAPRs, SCBA, and even disposable (filtering-facepiece) respirators. Positive-pressure masks must be temporarily converted to negative-pressure mode per regulatory requirements prior to fit testing. Series-95 disposable masks require use of the N95-Companion accessory. The PORTACOUNT Plus eliminates the awkward fit test hoods and chemical exposure concerns associated with other fit test methods. It uses the microscopic particles that exist in ambient air to measure the fit factor directly. The PORTACOUNT measures the concentration of these particles around the person's head and then measures the concentration of those particles that leak into the respirator. The ratio of these two numbers is the fit factor. A fit factor of 100, for example, means that the air inside the respirator is 100 times cleaner than the air outside. The PORTACOUNT measures a fit factor for each of the fit test exercises and then computes an overall fit factor for the entire test, along with a pass or fail indication. Advanced technology from TSI makes it possible for you to use the PORTACOUNT Plus to quantitatively fit test N95 disposable respirators. You no longer have to mess with the tedious and error-prone qualitative methods like saccharin, Bitrex, and irritant smoke. The N95-Companion works with the PORTACOUNT Plus to provide you with a complete solution to all of your fit testing needs. Use the PORTACOUNT alone for masks equipped with Series-99 and Series-100 filters. Simply add the N95-Companion to fit test masks with Series-95 filters, including the popular N95 filtering-facepiece disposables. When necessary, you can disconnect the N95-Companion in a matter of moments and use the PORTACOUNT Plus alone. The N95-Companion is simply an accessory for the PORTACOUNT Plus. The fit factor measurement is made by the PORTACOUNT. When the N95-Companion is attached, the PORTACOUNT uses only a small portion of the particles in the ambient air. The N95-Companion contains an electrostatic particle classifier. The particle classifier takes advantage of electrostatic charges that exist on ambient particles to strip out a predetermined particle size range of interest, from the broad range of sizes present in ambient air. The resulting particles leave the N95-Companion and are transported via flexible tubing to the PORTACOUNT for counting. The PORTACOUNT, seeing only the particles of interest, then compares the number outside the mask to the number inside the mask. This ratio of particles counted is the fit factor. For a detailed explanation of the theory of operation, see TSI's application bulletin ITI-053. This is the ultimate respirator fit test software . . . and its included with every PORTACOUNT Plus Respirator Fit Tester! FitPlus v3 Software has all the features you need to make accurate fit testing easy, automated and organized. The updated software prompts the respirator wearer through the required exercise protocol, records the results in a database, prints reports, and more. Select the worker name, choose a respirator from the list, enter the mask size, and go! The computer takes over from that point on by controlling the PORTACOUNT fit tester and prompting the worker to perform the proper fit test exercises one by one. Since your undivided attention is no longer required, you're free to get the next person ready. FitPlus software provides the vital documentation you need for your respirator program. You can provide management with hard-copy evidence that each employee passed a fit test, was trained to don the respirator properly and assigned a mask size that fits correctly. You can't get this from a qualitative fit test because the results are highly operator-dependent and subject to employee deception or misunderstanding. Specifications PORTACOUNT Plus Model 8020 Respirator Fit Tester Fit Factor Range: 1 to greater than 10,000 Concentration Range: 0.01 to 5105 particles/cm.sup.3 Particle Size Range: 0.02 to greater than 1 micrometer Typical Fit Factor Accuracy: 10% of reading Specifications Model 8095 N95-Companion Accessory Fit Factor Range: 1 to 200 Concentration Range: 0.01 to 5105 particles/cm.sup.3 Test Particle Size: 0.04 micrometer (nominal) Typical Fit Factor Accuracy: 10% of reading
(78) Using the PORTACOUNT Plus Model 8020 Respirator Fit Tester, applicant utilized the following method for testing a double bead adhesive seal having no bridges, where the double bead adhesive seal had essentially the structure of the beads 30 and 32 of
(79) The respirator used was a 3M 1860 N95 filtering facepiece respirator which is available in two sizes; small and regular. That respirator was selected because it has a very typical design with a pliable metal nose band that must be manually formed by the wearer to conform to the shape of the face and nose bridge. The fit test operator selected the size respirator that was likely to fit each test subject based on visual evaluation of face size and shape. The identical size respirator (with and without adhesive) was used for each pair of fit tests.
(80) The adhesive used for the double bead (independent beads, spaced from each other) was a pressure sensitive hot melt adhesive available from The Glue Factory, An Ellsworth Adhesives Company, of Appleton, Wis.
(81) The double bead (independent beads) of adhesive was applied from by a hot melt adhesive hand gun applicator, where the adhesive exits the hand gun applicator as a liquid and then cools to a rubber or rubbery like state. An automated process may be used to apply the adhesive to existing respirators. The adhesive application may or may not be an after market adhesive that may be easily applied by respirator users.
(82) The adhesive is a clear non-toxic material with very high adhesion to human skin. The adhesive remains tacky after a few donnings, indicating that the respirator could be used more than once, however this study did not evaluate reusability. All fit tests done on adhesive equipped respirators were first time donnings.
(83) The high adhesion was most obvious when the respirator was doffed. However, there was never any evidence of adhesive residue left on the skin after a respirator was removed.
(84) There were 7 male and 4 female test subjects. Workers with beards were not allowed to participate. However, there was no attempt to eliminate those who had facial stubble, were cigarette smokers, or had previous respirator experience. Test subjects were accepted as is.
(85) Test subject training was minimal, consisting of a verbal explanation of the respirator manufacturer's recommended donning method immediately prior to the fit test. Since the study was not concerned with test subject donning skills, the fit test operator assisted when necessary to make sure the respirator straps were properly positioned. Most test subjects had never worn a respirator before.
(86) Test subjects were directed to perform a positive and negative user seal check in an attempt to make sure the respirator was well seated. Adjustments to the nose band were made as needed. Once the test subject indicated that face seal leakage could not be detected, the fit test began immediately.
(87) The OSHA 8-exercise quantitative fit test protocol (29 CFR 1910.134) was used for all fit tests: NB: Normal breathing (60 sec) DB: Deep Breathing (60 sec) SS: Head Side to Side (60 sec) UD: Head up & down (60 sec) T: Talking out loud (60 sec) G: Grimace (15 sec, no measurement) B: Bending (60 sec) NB: Normal breathing (60 sec)
(88) Measurements were taken using a PortaCount Plus model 8020 Respirator Fit Tester (available from TSI Inc, Shoreview, Minn.) without the use of the N95-Companion accessory normally used with N95 respirators. The N95-Companion was not used because it limits the measurable fit factor to a value of 200, which would have biased the fit factor data. Fit factors above 200 were likely to occur; the filtration efficiency of the 3M 1860 respirator easily exceeds the 95% NIOSH minimum under the conditions present during typical fit testing with ambient aerosol.
(89) Notwithstanding the 200 limit, not using the N95-Companion probably caused fit factors to be lower than they would have been if it were used, since the function of the N95Companion is to eliminate filter penetration and isolate face seal leakage. Thus, the fit factors reported in this study should be thought of as total inward leakage (TIL) measurements. It should also be noted that this testing does not include an analysis of pass vs. fail for the OSHA minimum fit factor of 100. The use of TIL measurements instead of classic fit factors invalidates the application of that pass/fail value. However, it should be noted that since TIL measurements include filter leakage as well as face seal leakage, any TIL measurement above 100 can safely be assumed to indicate a fit factor above 100. In other words, a test subject who achieves a TIL-based fit factor value above 100 would certainly have passed the fit test with an even higher value if a classic fit factor (face seal only) measurement had been made.
(90) Another change was made due to the absence of the N95-Companion which employs a device called the sampling pendant that hangs around the test subject's neck and supports the weight of the 1.5-foot twin sample tube. Unlike most elastomeric respirators, filtering facepiece respirators can be affected by the weight of the sample tube pulling down. When the N95-Companion is not used, the 5-foot PortaCount sample tube (pair of inch ID in OD) represents a significant weight which could bias the measurements. For this study we used 5 feet of light weight tubing (pair of inch ID 3/16 inch OD) tubing which is less than half the weight of the factory tubing. In addition, subjects were instructed to prevent the sample tube from pulling on the respirator during the bending exercise by holding onto it with one hand.
(91) The respirators with adhesive yielded overall fit factors that were an average of 271 percent higher than overall fit factors without adhesive, as shown in Table 1 below.
(92) All subjects except for subject 10 experienced a higher fit factor with adhesive. Subject 10 achieved an overall fit factor of 1170 without adhesive, which was the highest non-adhesive overall fit factor recorded during the study. Keeping in mind that the measurements are technically TIL rather than true fit factors (see previous discussion), a measurement that high on an N95 filtering facepiece indicates near zero face seal leakage. A perfect fit cannot be improved, as suggested by the trivial 3 percent drop in the overall fit factor with adhesive (1170 to 1130).
(93) While the adhesive respirators showed improved overall fit factors in virtually all cases, individual exercise fit factors showed significant variation. It was observed that the exercises following the grimace maneuver were sometimes very low for the non-adhesive respirator. The purpose of the grimace exercise is to intentionally attempt to break the face seal in order to see if the respirator reseats afterwards. There is no measurement made during the 15-second grimace because what is important is the fit factor for the exercise following the grimace; bending. A high fit factor during bending indicates that the face seal either never broke during the grimace or it re-seated immediately. A low fit factor after the grimace indicates that the face seal was broken and failed to re-seat. Subjects 4 and 12 are cases where the non-adhesive respirator was fitting well until after the grimace. The adhesive respirator never exhibited face seal failure due to grimacing for any test subject. It was observed that breaking the aggressive adhesive seal with facial movement is unlikely because once the adhesive area is pressed against the skin the respirator cannot slide on the face. Movement of the face stresses the respirator fabric, but the adhesive seal remains intact.
(94) Subject 4 was tested despite not being clean shaven. A 3 day stubble was obvious and could be the cause of the face seal being broken and not resealed.
(95) Subject 12 had a large nose bridge and commented that he considered respirators generally useless for him because they always leaked. The first respirator tried was a regular and the wearer determined the nose bridge leakage was excessive and the test was terminated. The subject requested the other size (small) and determined the leakage was much less. The test was then completed and comparison made. In this case, we used the size that the wearer said felt like it sealed the best.
(96) The aggressiveness of the adhesive requires a modified donning procedure. The wearer must carefully center the respirator in the proper position on the face on the first try because the adhesive does not permit adjusting the respirator by sliding it on the face. If the respirator is not properly centered on first contact, it can be removed for another attempt, as the adhesive remains tacky for several donnings. The re-use of adhesive respirators was not part of this study and all subjects were cautioned about initial centering of the respirator.
(97) As the above method and results show, face seal adhesive can significantly improve the protection provided by an N95 filtering facepiece respirator.
(98) Events that can degrade the face seal of a respirator such as extreme facial movement or inadvertently shifting the respirator due to physical activity are much less likely to happen with an adhesive seal because the respirator is prevented from moving in relation to the face.
(99) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Comparison of Overall Fit Factors with and without adhesive double seal where most users had never worn a respirator Respirator with Respirator with adhesive no Percent double seal adhesive seal improvement Subject (overall fit (overall fit due to adhesive No. factor value) factor value) double seal 1 1120 676 66 9 619 181 242 3 1200 443 171 6 212 32 563 10 1130 1170 3 12 175 46 280 4 565 79 615 11 260 30 767 2 1000 691 45 5 1000 755 32 7 682 228 199 Average Percent Change 271 Correlation Factor 0.844
(100) The apparatus and method used to generate the data of Table 1 was also utilized to generate the data of Table 2 and Table 3 below, except that the face mask tested employed a single bead, namely, bead 30 instead of bead 32 of
(101) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparison of Overall Fit Factors with and without adhesive single seal for experienced users Respirator with Respirator with adhesive no Percent single seal adhesive seal improvement Subject (overall fit (overall fit due to adhesive No. factor value) factor value) single seal 042 94 56 68 0283 84 173 51 392 129 95 36 00734 42 40 5 1234 69 34 103 2457 290 154 88 2636 349 196 78 Average Percent Change 47 Correlation Factor 0.75
(102) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of Overall Fit Factors with and without adhesive single seal for inexperienced users Respirator with Respirator with adhesive no Percent single seal adhesive seal improvement Subject (overall fit (overall fit due to adhesive No. factor value) factor value) single seal 109 77 70 10 627 127 131 3 889 143 104 38 2429 43 181 76 02462 149 169 12 Average Percent Change 9 Correlation Factor 0.09
(103) The multiple seal arrangements shown and described in this application, i.e., the double seals with and without bridges, triple seals with and without bridges, and quadruple seals with and without bridges, may be employed on a number of face masks or respirators. These face masks or respirators include 1) face masks or respirators for occupational use, 2) face masks or respirators for use by the general public, 3) disposable face masks or respirators, 4) woven or nonwoven face masks or respirators, 5) face masks with multiple layers such as a filter layer and a supporting layer, 6) half masks, 7) full masks, 8) air supplied respirators, 9) self-contained respirators, 10) active respirators, 11) filtering face piece respirators, 12) air purifying face masks or respirators, 13) particulate filter face masks or respirators, 14) gas filtering or blocking face masks or respirators, 15) electret face masks or respirators, 16) face masks or respirators designed to protect the wearer of the face mask or respirator, 17) face masks or respirators designed to protect a person or thing other than wearer of the face mask, such as surgical face masks.
(104) The multiple seal arrangements shown and described in this application, i.e., the double seals with and without bridges, triple seals with and without bridges, and quadruple seals with and without bridges, may be employed on a number of face masks or respirators having a number of features, with the features including but not limited to the type of face mask, the shape of the face mask, the valve or valves on the face mask or respirator, the filter or covering of the face mask or respirator, the layer or layers or material or materials making up the filter or covering of the face mask or respirator, the chemical composition of the filter or covering of the face mask or respirator, and, as to such face masks and respirators and such features, the following U.S. Patents and U.S. Patent Application Publications are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties into this application:
(105) TABLE-US-00004 U.S. Pat. No. or U.S. Patent Application Date of issue or First named Publication date of Title of U.S. Patent or U.S. Patent inventor Number publication Application Publication Krueger et al. 4,729,371 Mar. 8, 1988 Respirator Comprised Of Blown Bicomponent Fibers Dyrud et al. 4,807,619 Feb. 28, 1989 Resilient Shape-Retaining Fibrous Filtration Face Mask Skov 4,850,347 Jul. 25, 1989 Face Mask Kronzer et al. 5,307,796 May 3, 1994 Methods of Forming Fibrous Filtration Face Masks Burgio 5,374,458 Dec. 20, 1994 Molded, Multiple-Layer Face Mask Byram 6,119,692 Sep. 19, 2000 Convenient Drop-Down Respirator Landgrebe et 6,420,455 B1 Jul. 16, 2002 Antimicrobial Composition Containing al. Photosensitizers Articles, And Methods Of Use Castiglione 6,705,317 B2 Mar. 16, 2004 Retention Assembly With Compression Element And Method Of Use Angadjivand 6,783,574 B1 Aug. 31, 2004 Electret Filter Media And Filtering et al. Masks That Contain Electret Filter Media Springett et al. 6,827,764 B2 Dec. 7, 2004 Molded Filter Element That Contains Thermally Bonded Staple Fibers And Electrically-Charged Microfibers Perez et al. 6,849,329 B2 Feb. 1, 2005 Charged Microfibers, Microfibrillated Articles And Use Thereof Kronzer et al. 7,131,442 B1 Nov. 7, 2006 Fibrous Filtration Face Mask Brey et al. 7,309,513 B2 Dec. 18, 2007 Broad Spectrum Filter System Including Tungsten-Based Impregnant And Being Useful For Filtering Contaminants From Air Or Other Gases Martin 7,503,326 B2 Mar. 17, 2009 Filtering Face Mask With A Unidirectional Valve Having A Stiff Unbiased Flexible Flap Leir et al. 7,390,351 B2 Jun. 24, 2008 Electrets And Compounds Useful In Electrets Betz et al. 7,594,510 B2 Sep. 29, 2009 Respiratory Protection Device Japuntich et US Feb. 28, 2002 Face Mask That Has A Filtered al. 2002/0023651 Exhalation Valve A1 Baumann et US Apr. 25, 2002 Anti-Fog Face Mask al. 2002/0046754 A1 Brostrom et US Jul. 11, 2002 Drop-Down Face Mask Assembly al. 2002/0088466 A1 Japuntich et US Jan. 9, 2003 Face Mask That Has A Filtered al. 2003/0005934 Exhalation Valve A1 Bostock et al. US Oct. 16, 2003 Flat-Folded Personal Respiratory 2003/0192546 Protection Devices And Processes For A1 Preparing Same Angadjivand US Jan. 22, 2004 Crush Resistant Filtering Face Mask et al. 2004/0011362 A1 Martin et al. US Dec. 23, 2004 Filtering Face Mask That Has A 2004/0255947 Resilient Seal Surface In Its Exhalation A1 Valve Mittelstadt et US Jun. 30, 2005 Unidirectional Respirator Valve al. 2005/0139216 A1 Bostock et al. US Aug. 17, 2006 Flat-Folded Personal Respiratory 2006/0180152 Protection Devices And Processes For A1 Preparing Same Japuntich et US May 31, 2007 Method Of Making A Filtering Face al. 2007/0119459 Mask Having New Exhalation Valve A1 Betz US Oct. 11, 2007 Full Face Respiratory Protection Device 2007/0235031 A1 Kalatoor US Jan. 31, 2008 Respirator That Uses A Predefined 2008/0023006 Curved Nose Foam A1 Gebrewold et US May 1, 2008 Respirator That Uses A Predefined al. 2008/0099022 Nose Foam Shape A1 Angadjivand US Dec. 25, 2008 Method Of Making Meltblown Fiber et al. 2008/0315454 Web With Staple Fibers A1 Angadjivand US Dec. 25, 2008 Molded Respirator Comprising et al. 2008/0318014 Meltblown Fiber Web With Staple A1 Fibers Lee et al. US Jan. 1, 2009 Respirator Having A Harness And 2009/0000624 Methods Of Making And Fitting The A1 Same Martin et al. US Mar. 26, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator That 2009/0078261 Has Expandable Mask Body A1 Gebrewold et US Mar. 26, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator Support al. 2009/0078262 Structure That Has Living Hinges A1 Martin et al. US Mar. 26, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator Having 2009/0078264 A Frame For Supporting The Exhalation A1 Valve Gebrewold et US Mar. 26, 2009 Respirator Having Dynamic Support al. 2009/0078265 Structure And Pleated Filtering A1 Structure Stepan et al. US Mar. 26, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator Having 2009/0078266 Buckles Integral To The Mask Body A1 Support Structure Daugaard et US Apr. 9, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator Having al. 2009/0090364 Nose Clip Molded Into The Mask Body A1 Martin et al. US May 28, 2009 Face Mask With Unidirectional Valve 2009/0133700 A1 Martin US Sep. 24, 2009 Filtering Face-Piece Respirator Having 2009/0235934 An Integrally-Joined Exhalation Valve A1
(106) As shown in
(107) The first endless skin adhesive seal 30 is between the periphery 16 of the covering 14 and the second endless skin adhesive seal 32. The second endless skin adhesive seal 32 includes an inner edge. The covering 14 extends in an inward direction from the inner edge of the second endless skin adhesive seal 32. The inward direction is a direction away from the first endless skin adhesive seal 30. The second endless skin adhesive seal 32 includes a first diametric portion and a second diametric portion. The first and second diametric portions extend diametrically across from each other. The single and common face of the inside 18 of the covering 14 extends diametrically between the first and second diametric portions. The second endless skin adhesive seal 32 includes an inner and outer edge. The inner edge of the second endless skin adhesive seal 32 defines an inner area. The single and common face extending a) inwardly from the inner edge of the second endless skin adhesive seal 32, b) into the inner area, and c) to an opposing portion of the second endless skin adhesive seal 32.
(108) Thus since the invention disclosed herein may be embodied in other specific forms without departing from the spirit or general characteristics thereof, some of which forms have been indicated, the embodiments described herein are to be considered in all respects illustrative and not restrictive. The scope of the invention is to be indicated by the appended claims, rather than by the foregoing description, and all changes which come within the meaning and range of equivalents of the claims are intended to be embraced therein.