Sample receptacle, sample container and method of use

Abstract

A sample receptacle including one or more receptacle cavities each having an opening dimensioned such that a liquid within the cavity is retained when the cavity opening is oriented downwardly and/or a gas vent in the base of each cavity sized and positioned to allow gases contained within the cavity to egress whilst preventing the egress of liquid at atmospheric pressure. A sample liquid may be poured into the sample receptacle so that the level of the sample liquid is above each cavity opening and the sample receptacle inverted so as to remove liquid above each cavity whilst retaining sample liquid in each sample receptacle when inverted. This may be used for sample separation or to provide relatively uniform sample volumes to sample wells of a sample container when mated. In another embodiment plungers may be used to eject liquid from receptacle wells via an aperture in the base of each receptacle well.

Claims

1. A sample analysis kit comprising: a. a sample receptacle including a plurality of receptacle wells, each receptacle well having a mouth at one end and one or more apertures in its base and one or more receptacle walls surrounding and extending above the wells; b. a sample container including one or more container wells each having a mouth dimensioned to mate with the base of a respective receptacle well; and c. a plunger assembly including one or more pistons, wherein each of the one or more pistons is dimensioned to advance within a respective receptacle well so as to eject liquid within the receptacle well out of each aperture.

2. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein a plurality of apertures are provided in the base of each receptacle well.

3. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 in which each receptacle well is mated with the mouth of each container well.

4. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 3 wherein a reactant is provided within each container well.

5. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 4 wherein different concentrations of at least one reactant are provided in at least some container wells.

6. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 4 wherein at least one reactant is an antibiotic.

7. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 4 wherein at least some container wells include a dye.

8. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 4 wherein each container well includes a bacteria culture media.

9. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein each receptacle well has a diameter of between 1 mm and 15 mm.

10. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein each receptacle well height is between 0.5 mm to 20 mm.

11. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein the cross-sectional area of each receptacle well mouth is less than 100 mm.sup.2.

12. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein the aperture functions as a gas vent providing a gas escape pathway from the base of each receptacle well.

13. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 12 wherein the gas vent has an area of less than 1 mm.sup.2.

14. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 1 wherein the one or more receptacle wall is greater than 1 mm higher than the one or more receptacle well mouths.

15. A sample analysis kit comprising: a. a sample receptacle including a plurality of receptacle wells, each receptacle well having a mouth at one end and one or more apertures in its base, each mouth being open to a region above the receptacle wells, the sample receptacle further including one or more perimeter receptacle walls surrounding and extending above the plurality of receptacle wells; b. a sample container including one or more container wells each having a mouth dimensioned to mate with the base of a respective receptacle well; and c. a plunger assembly including one or more pistons dimensioned to advance within a respective receptacle well so as to eject liquid within the receptacle well out of each aperture.

16. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 15, wherein each receptacle well is mated with the mouth of each container well.

17. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 15, wherein one or more of the group consisting of a reactant, a dye, and a bacteria culture medium is provided within each of the container wells.

18. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 17, wherein different concentrations of at least one reactant are provided in at least some container wells.

19. A sample analysis kit as claimed in claim 17, wherein at least one reactant is an antibiotic.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute part of the specification, illustrate embodiments of the invention and, together with the general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description of embodiments given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 is a top perspective view of a sample receptacle according to one embodiment;

(3) FIG. 2 is a bottom perspective view of the sample receptacle shown in FIG. 1;

(4) FIG. 3 is a bottom view of the sample receptacle shown in FIG. 1;

(5) FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the sample receptacle shown in FIG. 1;

(6) FIGS. 5-10 show sample receptacle cavity profiles according to a number of embodiments;

(7) FIG. 11 is a top perspective view of a sample container according to one embodiment;

(8) FIG. 12 is a bottom perspective view of the sample container shown in FIG. 11;

(9) FIG. 13 is a top view of the sample container shown in FIG. 11;

(10) FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view along line X-X of the sample container shown in FIG. 13;

(11) FIG. 15-17 show sample container well profiles according to a number of embodiments;

(12) FIG. 18 is a top perspective view of the sample receptacle of FIG. 1 mated with the sample container of FIG. 11;

(13) FIG. 19 is a top view of the mated components shown in FIG. 18;

(14) FIG. 20 is a cross-sectional view along line X-X of the mated components shown in FIG. 18;

(15) FIG. 21 is a bottom perspective view of a mat for sealing the wells of a sample container;

(16) FIG. 22 is a top perspective view of the mat shown in FIG. 21;

(17) FIG. 23 is a top perspective view of a mat as shown in FIG. 21 mated with a sample container as shown in FIG. 11; and

(18) FIG. 24 is a cross-sectional view of the mated sample container and mat shown in FIG. 23.

(19) FIG. 25 is a top perspective view of a sample receptacle according to a further embodiment;

(20) FIG. 26 is a top view of the sample receptacle shown in FIG. 25;

(21) FIG. 27 is a cross-sectional view of the sample receptacle shown in FIGS. 25 and 26;

(22) FIG. 28 shows sample receptacle cavity with its vent sealed by gel;

(23) FIG. 29 shows sample receptacle cavity having a plurality of perforations in its base;

(24) FIG. 30 is a top perspective view of a plunger assembly according to one embodiment;

(25) FIG. 31 is a top view of the plunger assembly shown in FIG. 30;

(26) FIG. 32 is a cross-sectional view along line X-X of the plunger assembly shown in FIG. 31;

(27) FIG. 33 is a top perspective view of the sample container according to a further embodiment;

(28) FIG. 34 is a top view of the sample container shown in FIG. 33;

(29) FIG. 35 is a cross-sectional view along line X-X of the sample container shown in FIG. 34;

(30) FIG. 36 is a top perspective view of a sample receptacle as shown in FIGS. 25 to 27 mated with a sample container as shown in FIGS. 33 to 35;

(31) FIG. 37 is a cross-sectional view of the mated sample container and sample receptacle shown in FIG. 36;

(32) FIG. 38 is a top perspective view showing a plunger assembly as shown in FIGS. 30 to 32 engaged in the cavities of a sample receptacle as shown in FIGS. 25 to 27 mated with a sample container as shown in FIGS. 33 to 35; and

(33) FIG. 39 is a cross-sectional view of the mated plunger assembly, sample container and sample receptacle shown in FIG. 38.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(34) The following description describes a sample receptacle and sample container and associated method suitable for the analysis of mastitis in milk. However, it is to be appreciated that the invention is not limited to this application and may be used to provide liquid samples of a desired volume in a wide variety of applications. Whilst these applications may include a wide range of laboratory and non-laboratory sample analysis applications the invention has particular application in relation to the analysis of biological samples such as milk, urine, blood, sputum, diluted faecal matter and tissue liquids. It may also be used in the analysis of water samples from lakes, rivers and the sea; water samples from wastewater plants; and aqueous and non-aqueous samples from industry, particularly the food industry. The sample receptacle and method may also find application for sample separation. In some applications it is desirable to remove floating particles, debris, fats or oils from a sample. In other cases the floating material may be the desired sample material. Potential applications include the removal of wanted or inhibitory substances for particle analysis, ELISA or DNA analysis such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or isothermal DNA amplification.

(35) FIGS. 1 to 4 show a sample receptacle 1 having a receptacle wall 2 surrounding a base 3 with a plurality of cavities 4 formed in the base. The receptacle wall is preferably greater than 1 mm higher than cavity openings, and more preferably greater than 3 mm, and even more preferably greater than 6 mm.

(36) Whilst a single cavity could be provided, an array of cavities is advantageous for multi-sample analysis. The cavities are preferably arranged in a regular array and arranged to mate with wells of a standard microplate such as defined in the ANSI SLAS 4-2004 (R2012) standard (formerly recognized as ANSI/SBS 4-2004). Preferred arrays are the standard 96 or 384 well plate arrays or 8, 24 or 48 well strip arrays.

(37) In use a liquid is introduced into the region of the sample receptacle bounded by wall 2 when upright (the orientation shown in FIG. 1) to a level above that of the cavity openings. This allows all cavities 4 to be filled in one simple imprecise pouring operation. When small cavities are filled with certain liquids (such as blood, urine, milk and water) air pockets may form. This is believed to be due to the manner in which liquid is introduced into the cavities and cohesive forces (surface tension) of the liquid forming a bridge which prevents the liquid filling the cavities. In addition, physicochemical properties of such liquids may be unfavourable to allow wetting of the sample receptacle. For a small sample the gravitational forces acting upon the liquid are too weak to overcome the bridge.

(38) In the embodiment shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 the base of each cavity is provided with a gas vent 5 of small cross-sectional area (in this case circular) to allow gas trapped within the cavity to vent. If the sample receptacle is filled with liquid and left to rest for a period the force of gravity upon the liquid and the gas venting path allows a substantial proportion of the entrapped gas to be released.

(39) The gas vent may be suitably sized and positioned to allow gases contained within the cavity to egress whilst preventing the egress of liquid. The ideal size will depend upon the sample liquid and material that the receptacle is formed of.

(40) The gas vent is preferably in the form of an opening in the base of each cavity or in a side wall of each cavity located towards the base. The gas vent preferably has a cross-sectional area of less than 1 mm.sup.2, and preferably less than 0.5 mm.sup.2, and more preferably less than 0.25 mm.sup.2 and even more preferably less than 0.1 mm.sup.2. Where the gas vent has a circular cross-section this equates to a diameter of less than 0.8 mm, more preferably less than 0.6 mm and even more preferably less than 0.45 mm. With such venting for liquids such as blood, urine, milk and water consistent volumes may be obtained with a coefficient of variation in volume typically less than 10%.

(41) In other embodiments no gas vents will be provided as for some liquids, such as organic solvents, for example ethanol, and oils for example medium chain triglyceride, more consistent volumes are delivered from each cavity when no vent is provided. It is believed that such liquids are less prone to formation of blocking bridges and the vents simply serve to leak a portion of the sample from the cavity. For certain liquids, such as ethanol and triglyceride more consistent volumes may be delivered without venting and with venting the coefficient of variation of sample volume may exceed 35%.

(42) If the sample receptacle is inverted excess liquid retained within receptacle wall 2 above and between the cavities 4 may be removed whilst liquid within the cavities 4 may be retained as will be described. Once liquid is filled into the cavities and the receptacle is held upside down, the liquid remains in the cavities due to adhesive and cohesive forces acting on the liquid if the cavity dimensions are appropriately selected. Adhesive forces apply between the liquid and the cavity wall and cohesive forces between liquid molecules. The gravitational forces are too weak to overcome the adhesive and cohesive forces without an additional force such as shaking or tapping the receptacle to release the liquid from the cavities.

(43) Where each cavity is a continuous cylindrical cavity and the opening is circular in cross-section the cavity diameter is preferably of a diameter of between 1 mm and 15 mm, more preferably between 2 mm and 10 mm, more preferably between 2 mm and 7 mm and even more preferably between 3 mm and 6 mm. The cavity opening may be of a smaller cross-sectional area than the cavity cross-sectional area. This may be advantageous where a large sample volume is desired. The opening may be in the form of a tapered opening or a lip defining an aperture of desired shapee.g. circular, rectangular or triangular. The cross-sectional area of the opening is preferably less than 100 mm.sup.2 and more preferably less than 64 mm.sup.2.

(44) Taking the above design considerations into account each cavity is to be dimensioned such as to retain liquid within the cavity when inverted and to release liquid retained in the cavity when the cavity opening is oriented downwardly and a dislodging force (such as a tap or shaking) is applied. The cavity height is preferably between 0.5 mm to 20 mm, more preferably between 2 mm to 7 mm. The volume of each cavity is preferably between 0.8 ul to 1 ml.

(45) Referring to FIGS. 5 to 10 a range of cavity profiles are shown. FIG. 5 shows a cavity of height H2 and diameter D2 with a curved or semi-spherical base 6. FIG. 6 shows a cavity of height H2 and diameter D2 having a curved or semi-spherical base 8 with a centrally located vent hole 7 of diameter D3. FIG. 7 shows a cavity of height H2 and diameter D2 having a flat base 9. FIG. 8 shows a cavity of height H7 and diameter D2 having a flat base 10 and centrally located gas vent 11 of diameter D3. FIG. 9 shows a cavity of height H7 and diameter D2 having a flat base 10 and an off-centre gas vent 11 of diameter D3. FIG. 10 shows a cavity of height H7 and diameter D2 having a flat base 14 and a gas vent 15 of diameter D3 through side wall 16.

(46) The sample receptacle is preferably formed of a thermoplastics material. Preferred thermoplastics materials include Acrylic, poly(methyl methacrylate), ABS (Acrylonitrile butadiene styrene), Nylon, PLA, Polylactic acid, Polybenzimidazole, Polycarbonate, Polyether sulfone, Polyetherether ketone, Polyetherimide, Polyethylene, Polyphenylene oxide, Polyphenylene sulfide, Polypropylene, Polystyrene, Polyvinyl chloride and Teflon. Particularly preferred materials include Polypropylene, Polyethylene, Polystyrene and ABS. Most preferred is Polypropylene.

(47) FIGS. 11 to 14 show a sample container suitable for use with the sample receptacle shown in FIGS. 1 to 4. The sample container 17 has a plurality of wells 18 dimensioned and arranged so as to mate with a corresponding sample receptacle. The mouths of each well have a slot 19 which has two purposes. Firstly it allows a certain amount of deformation of the mouth of each well of the sample container to facilitate mating with each respective cavity of the sample receptacle. Secondly, when mated, the slot provides a gas vent to facilitate the transfer of liquid from the sample receptacle cavities to the wells of the sample container.

(48) The wells 18 are preferably arranged in a regular array such as defined in the ANSI SLAS 4-2004 (R2012) standard (formerly recognized as ANSI/SBS 4-2004). Preferred arrays are the standard 96 or 384 well plate arrays or 8, 24 or 48 well strip arrays. Each sample well is preferably capable of holding a volume of liquid between 1 ul to 2000 ul, more preferably 10 ul to 1000 ul, and even more preferably 20 ul to 500 ul.

(49) FIGS. 15 to 17 show a range of sample well shapes of diameter D1 and height H1. Where each well has a circular cross section its diameter is preferably between 1 mm to 10 mm. The well height is preferably between 2 mm to 50 mm. The base of each well may be conical as shown in FIG. 15, Frusto-conical as shown in FIG. 16, flat as shown in FIG. 17 or hemisperical as shown in FIG. 20.

(50) FIGS. 18 to 20 show the sample receptacle and sample container in use when mated together. In use a sample liquid is poured or otherwise introduced into the region defined by receptacle wall 2 to a level above the cavity openings (see orientation in FIG. 1). Depending upon the sample liquid, the liquid may or may not be left in the receptacle to settle. In the case of a milk sample a gas vent is provided and the sample is left to rest for a period for the gas in the liquid to egress through the gas vent.

(51) The receptacle is then inverted so that the cavity openings of the sample receptacle face downwardly. The liquid within the receptacle wall above and between the cavities drops away whilst liquid within the cavities is retained. The inverted sample receptacle is then mated with the sample container as shown in FIGS. 18 to 20. At this stage the liquid samples are still retained within each cavity with respective cavities and wells mated together forming a liquid tight connection. A dislodging force in the form of a tap to the base of the sample receptacle or shaking may release sample liquid from each cavity into each well of the sample container.

(52) In some applications instead of providing a gas vent it may be feasible to provide a column of liquid above each cavity of such height that the hydrostatic pressure of the liquid acting upon the liquid in the cavities expels trapped gasses. This would require a sample receptacle of larger dimensions though.

(53) Advantageously at least some of the wells of the sample container may be prefilled with one or more reactant. When testing for mastitis the wells may be pre-filled with bacteria culture media, dyes and a number of antibiotics, each in a range of different concentrations such as an antibiotic dilution series of 512 ug/ml, 256 ug/ml, 128 ug/ml, 64 ug/ml, 32 ug/ml, 16 ug/ml, 8 ug/ml, 4 ug/ml, 2 ug/ml, 1 ug/ml, 0.5 ug/ml, 0.25 ug/ml, 0.125 ug/ml, 0.0625 ug/ml, 0.032 ug/ml, 0.016 ug/ml. Other concentrations may of course be used depending upon the application.

(54) Dyes such as pH dyes, redox dyes, metabolic dyes, fluorescent dyes, bacteria culture media, and antimicrobials including antibiotics may also be pre-supplied to each well as a solid or liquid.

(55) Once the reactants (solid or liquid) are pre-supplied to wells, the sample container 17 may be closed with a mat 19 having a plurality of stoppers 20. Once the predetermined volume of sample liquid is supplied to each well (which may contain a desired concentration of a reactant, dye, culture media etc.) the mat will be removed from the sample container and the sample container and sample receptacle mated with the sample liquid released from each cavity into each respective well.

(56) Once the predetermined volume of sample liquid is supplied to each well the sample receptacle 1 may be removed and stoppers 20 of mat 19 may be mated with the mouths of the respective receptacles as shown in FIGS. 23 and 24. If required the samples and reactants may be incubated for an appropriate period of time. After incubation the wells may be analysedsuitably by an optical reader sensitive to the relevant spectrum for any dyes employed. The reader may also read a code applied to the sample container such as a bar code. This approach could of course be adapted for an automated system too.

(57) It has been found that the sample receptacle described above is able to deliver very consistent sample volumes independent of user skill and with the results varying little between users as shown in the examples at the end of this specification. This makes this approach particularly attractive for applications such as on farm mastitis detection in milk samples. A farm worker and/or veterinarian is able to simply and quickly obtain multiple samples of a required volume to perform one or more analyses without requiring special skill or training.

(58) Whilst the above description is directed to the use of the receptacle to deliver a relatively constant volume of sample fluid to the wells of a sample container the receptacle may be used alone for sample separation. If a sample liquid is introduced into the receptacle to a level above the openings of the receptacle cavities and allowed to settle for a suitable time then the sample liquid may separate into layerse.g. oil, fat, debris etc. may float to the top. The top layer above the cavities may be removed by inverting the receptacle and either the removed liquid may be utilised as a sample or the liquid remaining in the cavities may be used as a sample.

(59) There is thus provided a sample receptacle capable of quickly delivering multiple samples of uniform sample volumes with low standard deviation that requires little skill to use. The device is simple, effective and inexpensive and enables cost effective and timely on farm mastitis management.

(60) Referring now to FIGS. 25 to 39 a sample analysis kit according to a further embodiment will be described. The sample analysis kit includes a sample receptacle as shown in FIGS. 25 to 29 that may be mated with the sample container as shown in FIGS. 33 to 35 and a plunger assembly as shown in FIGS. 30 to 32 that may force liquid out of the receptacle wells.

(61) Referring to FIGS. 25 to 27 sample receptacle 21 includes a plurality of receptacle wells 23 surrounded by a receptacle wall 22. Each receptacle well 23 has one or more apertures 24 in its base. As shown in FIG. 27 a single aperture 24 may be provided in the base of each receptacle well 23. As in the previous embodiments this will function as a gas vent and so should be sized as per the previous embodiments.

(62) In the embodiment shown in FIG. 28 each aperture is sealed by a displaceable sealin this case gel 25 seals aperture 24. Each aperture could also be sealed by wax or similar material a melting point in a desired range (i.e. 35 C or 50 C) which melts and then releases the media from cavity into the well. In this case the venting hole could be much larger (several millimeters) so that gravitational forces only may release the liquid from the cavity into the well. Such a larger aperture may also allow for easier transfer of clotted or more viscous material. Such a seal may also retain and protect reactants within sample wells when a sample receptacle is mated with a sample container as described below. Whilst gel is given as an example the seal could be a thin layer adhered to the base of each receptacle well or a solid element inserted in each aperture etc.

(63) In the embodiment shown in FIG. 29 a plurality of apertures are provided by a perforated element 26 (such as a filter) provided at the base of each well 23. Each aperture of the perforated element would need to be sized to avoid the egress of fluid under normal atmospheric pressure. However, when each receptacle well 23 is pressurised this would provide a greater number apertures to assist the transfer of liquid to the sample wells. This may also be useful to separate out particles above a desired size. This feature could also be incorporated in the previous embodiments.

(64) FIGS. 30 to 32 show a plunger assembly 27 consisting of a base 28 with a plurality of pistons 29 projecting therefrom. The pistons 29 are dimensioned to locate snugly into the receptacle wells 23 so as to effectively displace fluid in each receptacle well whilst allowing gas to vent from the sample wells.

(65) FIGS. 33 to 35 show a sample container 30 consisting of a base 31 with a plurality of container wells 32 extending therefrom. Reactants 33 may be pre-supplied to each container well 32 as will be described below.

(66) In use the elements may be provided separately for a user to supply required reactants to the container wells 32 on site and assemble and use the kit. However, in many applications it may be desirable to provide reactants in each container well at the time of manufacture. As described in relation to the previous embodiment this may consist of a plurality of different antibiotics of different concentrations in each container well or some other desired combination of reactants. The sample receptacle 21 and sample container 30 may then be mated (see FIGS. 36 and 37) during manufacture so that a user has a pre-assembled unit to which a sample fluid may be directly supplied. Where each aperture in each receptacle well is sealed (as described above) then the reactants may be protected from the environment. This arrangement also protects against reactants falling out. The reactants in each container well may also be provided with an inert environment (e.g. inert gas) and/or a growth media etc.

(67) In use reactants 33 are provided in the container wells and the sample receptacle 21 and sample container 30 are mated (see FIGS. 36 and 37). This may either occur during manufacture or on site as discussed above. A sample liquid is then supplied to the sample receptacle 21 to a level above the mouths of the receptacle wells 23 and retained by receptacle wall 22. The mated sample receptacle and sample container may then be inverted to remove excess fluid as in the previous embodiment although this step is not essential in this embodiment. The plunger assembly 27 may then be mated (see FIG. 38) so that the pistons 29 enter the mouths of receptacle wells 23 (see FIG. 39). If there is excess liquid above the mouths of receptacle wells 23 this displaces around pistons 29 until they are engaged with mouths of the receptacle wells 23. In this way a constant volume of liquid is delivered from each well whether there is liquid above the mouth of each well or not. The pistons are then advanced along each receptacle well to eject fluid contained therein into the respective container well below. If a seal is provided over an aperture in the base of a receptacle well the pressure created by advancing each piston will dislodge it to allow fluid to flow through each aperture. Alternatively where a wax or similar seal is provided it may be heated to open each aperture.

(68) This arrangement saves a user from having to dispose of excess liquid from the sample receptacle. It also saves the user having to mate the sample receptacle and sample container where these come pre-assembled. Further this method saves the user having to mix reactants and sample fluid by shaking etc. as the jet of fluid entering each sample well effectively mixes with reactants. This forced approach may also be advantageous for clotted samples.

(69) While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of the embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in detail, it is not the intention of the Applicant to restrict or in any way limit the scope of the appended claims to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention in its broader aspects is not limited to the specific details, representative apparatus and method, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departure from the spirit or scope of the Applicant's general inventive concept.

Example 1

(70) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(71) TABLE-US-00001 poured off at A8 (user 2) A B C R1 1 84 91 87 2 89 96 88 3 86 91 87 4 80 96 89 5 85 96 90 6 83 95 89 7 83 86 91 8 89 86 89 Average Std CV ul 89 4 4.7% R2 1 83 91 87 2 88 89 90 3 84 83 91 4 85 83 90 5 83 88 90 6 82 89 89 7 80 85 90 8 39 83 86 Average Std CV ul 85 10 11.9% R3 1 83 96 87 2 82 86 86 3 83 88 88 4 83 86 88 5 83 90 88 6 84 84 91 7 84 87 89 8 56 84 88 Average Std CV ul 85 7 8.0% R4 1 90 87 97 2 84 83 92 3 87 93 85 4 84 91 85 5 83 89 86 6 79 87 87 7 82 87 87 8 50 82 88 Average Std CV ul 85 8 9.7% R5 1 83 91 89 2 84 88 85 3 86 91 87 4 87 90 88 5 84 88 89 6 85 95 90 7 83 89 90 8 77 88 91 Average Std CV ul 87 4 4.1% Overall average Std CV ul 86 7 8.3%

Example 2

(72) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(73) TABLE-US-00002 poured off at C8 (user 2) A B C R1 1 88 93 90 2 90 89 89 3 77 97 86 4 88 89 86 5 91 91 82 6 89 91 81 7 91 86 82 8 30 90 82 Average Std CV ul 85 12 14.4% R2 1 89 92 84 2 92 92 86 3 88 86 84 4 93 89 84 5 96 89 84 6 88 89 83 7 97 88 79 8 91 91 86 Average Std CV ul 88 4 4.7% R3 1 85 95 87 2 92 92 85 3 89 91 85 4 90 98 83 5 95 96 90 6 96 88 72 7 98 85 77 8 96 91 89 Average Std CV ul 89 6 7.0% R4 1 86 92 86 2 91 88 84 3 89 90 84 4 91 90 84 5 92 88 84 6 93 88 84 7 94 97 83 8 96 93 82 Average Std CV ul 89 4 4.8% R5 1 89 91 83 2 89 93 84 3 89 95 84 4 94 96 84 5 91 98 82 6 90 97 83 7 93 90 81 8 81 91 95 Average Std CV ul 89 5 5.9% Overall average Std CV ul 88 7 8.3%

Example 3

(74) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(75) TABLE-US-00003 poured off at A1 (user 2) A B C R1 1 86 85 90 2 82 89 88 3 86 87 85 4 87 85 88 5 84 89 87 6 90 96 90 7 76 97 91 8 93 95 93 Average Std CV ul 88 5 5.2% R2 1 80 82 87 2 77 89 89 3 82 91 87 4 81 93 88 5 83 86 87 6 87 90 90 7 79 90 89 8 53 91 96 Average Std CV ul 85 8 9.5% R3 1 83 89 89 2 86 87 91 3 79 80 88 4 78 74 92 5 84 92 88 6 82 81 82 7 82 96 91 8 83 97 98 Average Std CV ul 86 6 7.1% R4 1 83 86 91 2 87 89 90 3 79 59 94 4 80 81 91 5 81 68 91 6 79 87 91 7 82 86 80 8 61 95 95 Average Std CV ul 84 9 11.3% R5 1 88 90 89 2 88 89 90 3 80 89 91 4 82 91 91 5 92 94 91 6 83 89 89 7 87 92 88 8 36 97 95 Average Std CV ul 87 11 13.0% Overall average Std CV ul 86 8 9.8%

Example 4

(76) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(77) TABLE-US-00004 poured off at C1 (user 2) A B C R1 1 89 87 87 2 92 87 81 3 92 89 82 4 88 95 78 5 86 93 85 6 95 94 83 7 95 97 85 8 94 98 83 Average Std CV ul 89 5 6.1% R2 1 88 86 89 2 89 87 82 3 89 85 86 4 84 87 81 5 93 87 87 6 95 96 87 7 94 98 86 8 93 92 87 Average Std CV ul 89 4 4.8% R3 1 86 84 90 2 88 86 81 3 88 89 79 4 85 86 82 5 84 89 81 6 97 91 83 7 89 70 84 8 88 98 84 Average Std CV ul 86 6 6.5% R4 1 85 86 87 2 87 87 77 3 86 84 78 4 87 91 80 5 88 91 80 6 84 61 78 7 85 92 82 8 92 89 81 Average Std CV ul 84 6 7.7% R5 1 86 83 79 2 88 86 79 3 86 86 76 4 90 84 81 5 85 88 78 6 94 87 83 7 84 93 80 8 93 92 80 Average Std CV ul 85 5 5.8% Overall average Std CV ul 87 6 6.6%

Example 5

(78) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(79) TABLE-US-00005 poured off at A1 (user 1) A B C R1 1 75 91 84 2 59 91 80 3 80 90 81 4 80 94 87 5 81 93 86 6 78 86 88 7 77 83 86 8 85 81 87 Average Std CV ul 83 7 8.5% R2 1 80 89 87 2 77 89 87 3 79 94 86 4 80 86 96 5 78 84 90 6 75 93 91 7 79 85 87 8 84 83 83 Average Std CV ul 85 5 6.4% R3 1 84 87 91 2 81 92 89 3 82 88 91 4 75 86 89 5 76 85 84 6 81 83 52 7 80 80 86 8 85 80 81 Average Std CV ul 83 8 9.4% R4 1 82 88 84 2 79 90 91 3 81 82 85 4 77 86 54 5 72 88 85 6 80 84 87 7 77 86 83 8 82 78 82 Average Std CV ul 82 7 8.9% R5 1 79 84 79 2 77 84 92 3 79 84 59 4 79 81 82 5 82 77 82 6 75 88 89 7 76 80 85 8 87 84 83 Average Std CV ul 81 6 7.6% Overall average Std CV ul 83 7 8.4%

Example 6

(80) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. The cavities have no vent hole. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(81) TABLE-US-00006 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 14 12 85 2 22 87 84 3 3 92 7 4 3 91 7 5 14 96 87 6 2 90 87 7 3 3 88 8 9 3 92 Average Std CV ul 45 41 90.4% R2 1 6 4 13 2 1 4 17 3 5 7 12 4 15 10 13 5 9 1 9 6 6 4 27 7 1 7 87 8 7 99 58 Average Std CV ul 18 25 145.0% R3 1 15 84 9 2 0 79 9 3 17 6 18 4 23 72 22 5 27 88 8 6 88 88 9 7 87 89 8 8 88 93 14 Average Std CV ul 43 36 83.7% R4 1 81 6 18 2 10 4 6 3 16 50 1 4 92 95 1 5 91 96 33 6 91 1 23 7 7 7 2 8 80 95 90 Average Std CV ul 42 39 94.6% R5 1 85 84 84 2 76 87 35 3 76 86 12 4 4 1 46 5 4 4 52 6 51 6 92 7 8 86 91 8 2 96 91 Average Std CV ul 52 37 70.0% Overall average Std CV ul 40 38 95.0%

Example 7

(82) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is full fat homogenised milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each well, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(83) TABLE-US-00007 Sample Container A B C C1 1 72 87 75 2 78 90 79 3 65 82 74 4 63 80 82 5 78 89 85 6 74 91 76 7 67 84 76 8 74 78 77 Average Std CV ul 78 7 9.2% C2 1 76 76 77 2 62 78 66 3 70 73 76 4 69 76 77 5 77 85 78 6 73 79 68 7 81 88 73 8 72 86 85 Average Std CV ul 76 6 8.2% C3 1 87 73 89 2 82 81 78 3 77 84 75 4 82 78 82 5 76 84 84 6 83 77 83 7 75 82 78 8 81 83 71 Average Std CV ul 80 4 5.4% C4 1 70 73 62 2 78 84 63 3 68 79 68 4 78 73 73 5 76 84 71 6 85 65 75 7 72 78 67 8 78 96 71 Average Std CV ul 74 8 10.3% C5 1 65 73 74 2 75 84 69 3 74 85 73 4 71 88 84 5 84 83 88 6 83 82 82 7 77 86 71 8 73 80 83 Average Std CV ul 79 6 8.2% Overall average Std CV ul 77 7 8.8%

Example 8

(84) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is 10% whole milk powder liquid (reconstituted). The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(85) TABLE-US-00008 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 76 85 89 2 83 88 90 3 86 91 90 4 86 89 94 5 87 93 90 6 89 91 93 7 92 94 91 8 89 96 91 Average Std CV ul 89 4 4.6% R2 1 78 85 87 2 83 87 92 3 88 89 88 4 85 86 87 5 86 81 93 6 88 90 87 7 88 90 82 8 88 95 86 Average Std CV ul 87 4 4.2% R3 1 78 86 87 2 86 87 91 3 85 86 86 4 83 90 89 5 86 95 92 6 81 93 86 7 84 95 94 8 86 96 90 Average Std CV ul 88 5 5.1% R4 1 81 85 89 2 78 88 90 3 84 91 87 4 86 90 90 5 85 88 90 6 85 96 95 7 84 94 93 8 86 90 91 Average Std CV ul 88 4 4.8% R5 1 80 84 89 2 81 88 87 3 84 85 89 4 84 87 89 5 85 95 89 6 85 86 94 7 88 48 93 8 84 92 89 Average Std CV ul 86 9 10.1% Overall average Std CV ul 88 5 6.3%

Example 9

(86) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is 10% whole milk powder liquid (reconstituted). The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(87) TABLE-US-00009 Sample Container A B C C1 1 80 70 73 2 76 79 75 3 76 87 75 4 80 78 72 5 79 80 74 6 81 88 67 7 81 95 87 8 80 90 78 Average Std CV ul 79 6 8.1% C2 1 76 68 71 2 78 78 76 3 74 79 74 4 82 79 75 5 82 78 73 6 83 83 71 7 81 90 71 8 79 87 78 Average Std CV ul 78 5 6.6% C3 1 67 74 70 2 74 74 77 3 77 80 71 4 73 70 76 5 79 73 74 6 73 81 71 7 79 88 78 8 71 85 79 Average Std CV ul 76 5 6.4% C4 1 76 71 66 2 80 74 65 3 81 74 69 4 82 70 74 5 84 83 73 6 83 77 75 7 71 87 66 8 67 85 74 Average Std CV ul 75 6 8.5% C5 1 76 73 58 2 72 67 63 3 74 68 76 4 73 69 69 5 85 77 71 6 73 72 69 7 69 82 70 8 75 86 69 Average Std CV ul 72 6 8.5% Overall average Std CV ul 76 6 8.3%

Example 10

(88) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is 10% whole milk powder liquid (reconstituted). The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. No vent hole is provided in the cavities in this example. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(89) TABLE-US-00010 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 7 0 13 2 4 2 15 3 4 0 12 4 4 12 40 5 7 95 81 6 1 100 9 7 1 99 40 8 93 7 96 Average Std CV ul 31 38 122.6% R2 1 0 4 11 2 8 0 14 3 21 3 21 4 36 94 99 5 1 101 47 6 33 77 19 7 2 96 95 8 5 92 8 Average Std CV ul 37 38 103.4% R3 1 9 4 13 2 5 3 11 3 12 55 16 4 57 95 6 5 9 97 3 6 8 101 6 7 0 99 8 8 0 94 8 Average Std CV ul 30 37 124.1% R4 1 2 0 3 2 5 94 7 3 91 95 27 4 90 99 8 5 93 94 4 6 91 4 10 7 93 92 94 8 5 4 9 Average Std CV ul 46 43 93.5% R5 1 12 0 10 2 0 100 7 3 4 11 9 4 2 93 5 5 20 12 13 6 93 41 8 7 92 102 7 8 0 5 10 Average Std CV ul 27 36 132.3% Overall average Std CV ul 34 39 114.4%

Example 11

(90) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is sheep blood. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(91) TABLE-US-00011 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 83 90 91 2 85 91 90 3 92 97 92 4 86 29 85 5 86 91 93 6 86 92 93 7 90 94 98 8 89 93 92 Average Std CV ul 88 13 14.6% R2 1 82 90 88 2 79 88 88 3 84 95 83 4 86 95 90 5 81 88 94 6 83 88 93 7 84 98 85 8 89 102 90 Average Std CV ul 88 5 6.2% R3 1 85 92 89 2 83 90 87 3 87 91 90 4 83 94 89 5 80 88 85 6 85 89 85 7 85 87 87 8 85 96 88 Average Std CV ul 88 4 4.1% R4 1 80 87 89 2 82 90 89 3 81 92 89 4 83 87 90 5 82 92 89 6 78 91 87 7 88 88 88 8 82 93 92 Average Std CV ul 87 4 4.8% R5 1 79 85 84 2 85 85 88 3 83 90 80 4 85 87 88 5 80 91 91 6 81 93 84 7 86 46 87 8 83 88 88 Average Std CV ul 84 9 10.4% Overall average Std CV ul 87 8 9.1%

Example 12

(92) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is sheep blood. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. No vent holes were provided in the cavities. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each well, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(93) TABLE-US-00012 Sample receptacle with closed vents A B C R1 1 84 87 89 2 81 92 88 3 25 92 89 4 27 87 91 5 29 86 91 6 10 90 13 7 13 88 13 8 11 98 100 Average Std CV ul 66 34 52.4% R2 1 78 85 7 2 85 89 9 3 83 90 7 4 81 84 14 5 29 88 87 6 33 88 7 7 33 89 20 8 6 97 96 Average Std CV ul 58 36 61.9% R3 1 81 90 12 2 83 85 9 3 85 91 9 4 2 87 89 5 21 91 83 6 16 87 93 7 14 46 51 8 11 93 68 Average Std CV ul 58 35 59.9% R4 1 15 81 11 2 3 88 81 3 3 86 86 4 2 2 87 5 3 95 86 6 6 93 86 7 10 92 87 8 6 88 83 Average Std CV ul 53 40 75.2% R5 1 87 82 87 2 71 86 83 3 80 88 14 4 78 2 8 5 81 88 12 6 77 88 12 7 84 88 95 8 88 84 9 Average Std CV ul 66 33 49.9% Overall average Std CV ul 60 36 59.9%

Example 13

(94) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is urine. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(95) TABLE-US-00013 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 81 87 90 2 82 91 92 3 87 89 91 4 87 84 90 5 87 93 89 6 87 97 90 7 87 97 91 8 87 95 91 Average Std CV ul 89 4 4.4% R2 1 85 88 84 2 84 90 90 3 84 91 93 4 85 89 92 5 87 93 89 6 86 95 89 7 86 90 94 8 87 87 91 Average Std CV ul 89 3 3.6% R3 1 84 81 92 2 84 87 89 3 82 92 91 4 89 90 91 5 87 90 90 6 88 88 89 7 87 94 78 8 91 91 89 ul Average Std CV 88 4 4.3% R4 1 80 87 87 2 85 89 93 3 87 89 91 4 85 88 89 5 88 92 91 6 88 93 86 7 85 96 90 8 89 91 94 Average Std CV ul 89 3 3.8% R5 1 79 86 83 2 83 85 90 3 83 88 88 4 80 88 90 5 87 85 89 6 86 85 90 7 82 85 91 8 85 92 91 Average Std CV ul 86 3 4.0% Overall average Std CV ul 88 4 4.2%

Example 14

(96) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is urine. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(97) TABLE-US-00014 Sample Container A B C C1 1 75 71 77 2 64 69 57 3 67 73 53 4 64 78 73 5 76 64 77 6 61 70 89 7 81 76 78 8 64 70 57 Average Std CV ul 70 8 11.9% C2 1 87 73 73 2 64 86 72 3 58 71 80 4 78 70 78 5 86 84 82 6 84 87 69 7 71 88 84 8 71 74 74 Average Std CV ul 77 8 10.3% C3 1 80 79 67 2 94 80 72 3 74 79 72 4 82 84 82 5 70 80 74 6 75 78 78 7 72 62 83 8 67 79 88 Average Std CV ul 77 7 9.0% C4 1 78 82 88 2 80 84 92 3 85 90 88 4 85 86 91 5 85 88 90 6 85 90 97 7 88 90 88 8 88 94 91 Average Std CV ul 88 4 4.8% C5 1 63 77 77 2 69 71 76 3 73 68 74 4 67 69 73 5 76 83 71 6 68 73 67 7 75 71 65 8 76 70 81 Average Std CV ul 72 5 6.6% Overall average Std CV ul 77 9 11.7%

Example 15

(98) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is urine. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. The cavities have no vent hole. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(99) TABLE-US-00015 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 0 0 9 2 2 0 13 3 2 1 1 4 4 7 4 5 3 3 2 6 6 0 8 7 4 91 35 8 1 0 0 Average Std CV ul 8 19 228.9% R2 1 6 0 10 2 3 0 8 3 9 1 5 4 2 0 7 5 3 97 95 6 2 2 2 7 0 96 3 8 3 96 3 Average Std CV ul 19 35 183.3% R3 1 1 0 3 2 2 0 5 3 8 1 8 4 3 0 6 5 2 92 2 6 94 94 5 7 0 95 95 8 5 95 95 Average Std CV ul 30 42 140.3% R4 1 0 0 2 2 2 1 0 3 90 0 0 4 5 99 38 5 3 0 12 6 0 97 7 7 0 70 0 8 0 42 94 Average Std CV ul 23 36 154.3% R5 1 0 0 0 2 1 0 6 3 1 93 2 4 0 95 2 5 16 94 1 6 3 93 2 7 2 1 58 8 0 3 8 Average Std CV ul 20 35 174.3% Overall average Std CV ul 20 35 173.6%

Example 16

(100) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is mastitis milk. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(101) TABLE-US-00016 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 62 63 61 2 61 64 55 3 55 64 59 4 58 62 51 5 56 66 53 6 57 58 45 7 62 61 47 8 74 73 53 Average Std CV ul 59 5 9.2% R2 1 63 69 46 2 66 73 57 3 52 73 54 4 65 68 63 5 63 65 70 6 58 67 62 7 53 64 60 8 66 59 62 Average Std CV ul 62 7 11.1% Overall average Std CV ul 61 7 10.8%

Example 17

(102) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is H.sub.2O. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(103) TABLE-US-00017 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 71 83 88 2 79 89 88 3 82 89 87 4 87 89 87 5 91 88 95 6 91 92 92 7 96 91 93 8 84 86 94 Average Std CV ul 88 5 6.1% R2 1 74 82 86 2 85 87 88 3 91 88 92 4 89 90 86 5 91 94 92 6 88 95 94 7 81 26 91 8 91 91 91 Average Std CV ul 86 13 15.5% R3 1 94 90 89 2 85 93 87 3 83 85 77 4 89 28 92 5 90 93 90 6 93 88 90 7 89 88 94 8 92 89 90 Average Std CV ul 87 13 14.8% R4 1 71 85 86 2 82 85 89 3 87 90 88 4 89 87 93 5 91 92 91 6 92 34 91 7 91 90 93 8 88 90 93 Average Std CV ul 86 12 13.7% R5 1 77 84 86 2 84 89 83 3 89 86 91 4 92 89 90 5 90 89 93 6 85 81 98 7 89 95 91 8 92 91 91 Average Std CV ul 89 5 5.1% Overall average Std CV ul 87 10 11.9%

Example 18

(104) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is H2O. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(105) TABLE-US-00018 Sample Container A B C C1 1 84 89 64 2 85 91 83 3 90 84 90 4 91 88 90 5 90 90 90 6 74 95 91 7 91 88 91 8 95 91 93 Average Std CV ul 88 7 7.5% C2 1 35 86 70 2 90 88 86 3 89 91 88 4 92 94 88 5 91 95 92 6 92 95 91 7 96 96 85 8 90 90 86 Average Std CV ul 87 12 13.8% C3 1 89 84 76 2 88 89 86 3 89 94 90 4 90 92 90 5 90 95 93 6 92 94 91 7 92 96 95 8 92 92 92 Average Std CV ul 90 4 4.5% C4 1 90 84 76 2 88 90 83 3 90 93 89 4 91 89 60 5 91 94 92 6 90 90 90 7 90 96 91 8 90 97 92 Average Std CV ul 89 7 8.2% C5 1 78 83 74 2 89 93 86 3 88 94 90 4 91 95 90 5 89 97 93 6 90 95 90 7 92 96 96 8 91 90 92 Average Std CV ul 90 5 5.9% Overall average Std CV ul 89 8 8.6%

Example 19

(106) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is H2O. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. The cavities have no vent hole. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(107) TABLE-US-00019 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 0 0 8 2 0 90 14 3 0 0 11 4 0 0 8 5 91 96 44 6 17 46 7 7 6 15 0 8 4 50 12 Average Std CV ul 22 30 140.4% R2 1 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 3 7 0 0 4 10 97 10 5 2 98 0 6 13 36 24 7 0 97 9 8 0 0 0 Average Std CV ul 17 31 183.0% R3 1 0 0 7 2 5 90 11 3 34 94 10 4 0 91 5 5 9 95 8 6 15 91 17 7 10 58 11 8 7 0 0 Average Std CV ul 28 35 126.4% R4 1 0 0 6 2 0 0 9 3 9 0 7 4 4 93 11 5 2 93 10 6 7 94 21 7 14 0 16 8 7 0 7 Average Std CV ul 17 29 171.7% R5 1 0 0 0 2 0 90 10 3 2 77 6 4 3 96 4 5 3 94 11 6 7 89 5 7 0 96 7 8 2 98 5 Average Std CV ul 29 40 136.5% Overall average Std CV ul 23 34 149.9%

Example 20

(108) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is Ethanol. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(109) TABLE-US-00020 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 44 71 69 2 66 69 68 3 66 64 50 4 67 60 20 5 66 52 11 6 67 42 7 7 68 13 6 8 66 6 5 Average Std CV ul 47 25 53.6% R2 1 60 72 69 2 67 67 65 3 66 64 53 4 65 64 38 5 68 58 32 6 68 55 27 7 68 41 18 8 68 30 6 Average Std CV ul 54 18 34.3% R3 1 53 68 75 2 66 76 72 3 67 63 60 4 65 64 53 5 68 57 44 6 66 58 36 7 68 44 27 8 68 35 10 Average Std CV ul 57 16 28.3% R4 1 47 66 61 2 61 62 56 3 64 61 48 4 65 62 38 5 65 54 25 6 67 51 21 7 66 37 11 8 66 27 6 Average Std CV ul 49 18 37.3% R5 1 62 64 59 2 67 62 56 3 67 62 52 4 67 65 36 5 69 61 27 6 66 58 27 7 70 44 16 8 67 37 7 Average Std CV ul 53 18 33.7% Overall average Std CV ul 52 20 38.0%

Example 21

(110) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is Ethanol. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(111) TABLE-US-00021 Sample Container A B C C1 1 60 59 37 2 67 69 53 3 68 69 53 4 63 66 55 5 60 64 66 6 62 68 60 7 61 65 58 8 62 64 60 Average Std CV ul 61 7 11.1% C2 1 54 67 34 2 54 62 41 3 49 68 50 4 67 65 62 5 68 70 61 6 65 68 66 7 70 72 65 8 69 70 56 Average Std CV ul 61 10 15.7% C3 1 65 66 29 2 64 69 42 3 68 69 40 4 66 68 49 5 61 63 63 6 64 66 67 7 56 66 52 8 67 66 46 Average Std CV ul 60 11 17.9% C4 1 60 64 25 2 52 55 42 3 53 56 52 4 61 65 51 5 61 66 67 6 63 66 36 7 64 62 33 8 60 63 37 Average Std CV ul 55 12 21.2% C5 1 64 66 17 2 64 69 42 3 67 68 48 4 68 61 45 5 61 63 59 6 65 59 50 7 66 66 38 8 65 57 54 Average Std CV ul 58 12 20.9% Overall average Std CV ul 59 11 18.0%

Example 22

(112) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is Ethanol. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. The cavities have no vent hole. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(113) TABLE-US-00022 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 49 70 72 2 65 70 71 3 70 72 73 4 69 71 72 5 69 72 72 6 66 72 72 7 70 71 73 8 70 71 69 Average Std CV ul 70 5 6.8% R2 1 56 71 70 2 66 72 73 3 69 72 73 4 70 71 73 5 70 71 71 6 68 67 71 7 70 71 70 8 70 73 71 Average Std CV ul 70 3 4.9% R3 1 64 71 70 2 66 70 73 3 67 72 73 4 69 70 71 5 68 72 70 6 67 70 72 7 69 70 71 8 70 73 70 Average Std CV ul 70 2 3.2% R4 1 49 69 70 2 67 70 70 3 68 71 73 4 68 68 69 5 69 69 70 6 70 70 70 7 70 72 66 8 69 71 70 Average Std CV ul 69 4 6.3% R5 1 62 69 66 2 67 68 66 3 68 68 71 4 68 70 68 5 67 71 70 6 70 72 74 7 69 74 74 8 70 73 70 Average Std CV ul 69 3 4.1% Overall average Std CV ul 70 4 5.3%

Example 23

(114) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is medium chain triglyceride Miglyol 812. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(115) TABLE-US-00023 Sample receptacle with venting holes A B C R1 1 72 78 78 2 76 78 73 3 65 79 74 4 72 86 67 5 74 80 62 6 79 81 60 7 72 75 54 8 75 74 73 Average Std CV ul 73 7 9.7% R2 1 60 76 70 2 77 77 74 3 72 83 75 4 73 71 71 5 67 80 63 6 67 87 64 7 79 68 45 8 68 56 15 Average Std CV ul 68 14 20.7% R3 1 64 80 56 2 61 97 69 3 70 95 55 4 71 75 63 5 79 75 61 6 70 70 74 7 70 74 62 8 76 70 35 Average Std CV ul 70 12 17.6% R4 1 76 65 46 2 62 50 23 3 53 85 30 4 75 44 28 5 67 53 11 6 48 49 10 7 72 44 5 8 78 30 9 Average Std CV ul 46 23 50.4% R5 1 73 77 72 2 75 86 71 3 68 86 79 4 78 78 72 5 74 85 64 6 80 89 56 7 69 81 44 8 71 70 42 Average Std CV ul 73 12 15.9% Overall average Std CV ul 66 18 26.9%

Example 24

(116) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is medium chain triglyceride Miglyol 812. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. A cylindrical vent hole having a diameter of 0.2 mm is provided in the base of each cavity. The liquid samples in each cavity were delivered into respective wells of a sample container. The five tests C1 to C5 show the volumes in each well in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(117) TABLE-US-00024 Sample Container A B C C1 1 50 50 42 2 55 54 55 3 50 48 48 4 50 53 56 5 49 59 57 6 50 53 49 7 50 53 53 8 57 64 74 Average Std CV ul 53 6 11.5% C2 1 43 62 22 2 44 65 12 3 40 71 24 4 55 75 27 5 49 66 9 6 51 64 48 7 60 62 52 8 61 63 63 Average Std CV ul 50 18 36.7% C3 1 49 45 41 2 42 43 67 3 43 57 64 4 49 63 63 5 50 62 62 6 53 55 56 7 68 53 52 8 65 63 57 Average Std CV ul 55 8 15.1% C4 1 40 50 45 2 48 43 45 3 45 46 47 4 46 46 53 5 51 48 50 6 45 52 51 7 42 48 54 8 58 55 63 Average Std CV ul 49 5 10.6% C5 1 37 50 59 2 49 54 63 3 46 65 60 4 75 63 67 5 60 69 54 6 64 55 58 7 60 46 69 8 70 66 58 Average Std CV ul 59 9 14.9% Overall average Std CV ul 53 11 20.8%

Example 25

(118) In this example a receptacle of the form shown in FIGS. 1 to 4 was used to assess the variation in volume per cavity where the sample fluid is medium chain triglyceride Miglyol 812. The receptacle has 3 rows A to C and eight columns 1 to 8. The cavities have no vent hole. The five tests R1 to R5 show the volumes in each cavity in ul, the average volume in each cavity, the standard deviation (Std) and the coefficient of variation (CV) and at the end the Std and CV for all tests.

(119) TABLE-US-00025 Sample receptacle with closed venting holes A B C R1 1 75 69 72 2 67 73 74 3 71 76 73 4 60 75 75 5 69 75 81 6 67 80 79 7 69 83 84 8 67 80 81 Average Std CV ul 74 6 7.9% R2 1 57 79 76 2 69 76 78 3 75 78 79 4 70 85 83 5 76 79 87 6 75 82 85 7 70 83 77 8 70 77 87 Average Std CV ul 77 7 8.6% R3 1 81 76 74 2 70 80 80 3 76 88 77 4 72 87 80 5 76 92 85 6 72 83 82 7 70 88 82 8 79 89 77 Average Std CV ul 80 6 7.6% R4 1 79 68 78 2 70 80 75 3 70 85 85 4 69 85 80 5 71 87 87 6 76 84 81 7 70 78 83 8 79 86 78 Average Std CV ul 79 6 7.7% R5 1 72 83 82 2 74 84 79 3 74 82 81 4 74 86 85 5 71 81 83 6 77 85 83 7 73 88 83 8 78 88 77 Average Std CV ul 80 5 6.2% Overall average Std CV ul 78 6 8.1%