Microfluidic device for selection of semen
10670508 ยท 2020-06-02
Assignee
Inventors
- Bjorn de Wagenaar (Enschede, NL)
- Loes Irene Segerink (Enschede, NL)
- Wouter OLTHUIS (Enschede, NL)
- Adrianus Joseph Sprenkels (Enschede, NL)
- Albert van den Berg (Enschede, NL)
Cpc classification
B01L2300/0864
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L3/502776
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G01N2800/367
PHYSICS
B01L3/502761
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B01L2200/143
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
The invention provides a system (1) for performing sperm analysis and selection based on sperm cell morphology of sperm cells (6) in a fluid (5), the system (1) comprising: (i) a fluid flow channel (2) for transport of said fluid (5), the fluid flow channel (2) comprising an inlet (10) an analyzing zone (40) configured downstream from said inlet (10) and comprising a first pair of electrodes (41) comprising a first intra-electrode distance (dl), a sorting zone (50) configured downstream from said analyzing zone (40) and comprising a sorting device (51), and outlets (80, 90, . . . ) configured downstream from said sorting zone (50); (ii) an electric source (140) configured to provide an electric signal to the first pair of electrodes (41); (iii) a measuring device (150) functionally coupled to the first pair of electrodes (41) and configured to measure a first impedance as a function of time of the fluid (5) between the first pair of electrodes, and to provide time-dependent impedance data; wherein the sorting device (51) is configured to sort sperm cells (6) by directing the sperm cell (6) in the sorting zone (50) to one of the outlets (80, 90, . . . ) based on a comparison in a comparison stage of the time dependent impedance data with predefined reference data.
Claims
1. A system for performing sperm analysis and selection based on sperm cell morphology of sperm cells in a fluid, the system comprising: (i) a fluid flow channel for transport of said fluid, the fluid flow channel comprising an inlet, an analyzing zone configured downstream from said inlet and comprising a first pair of electrodes comprising a first intra-electrode distance, and a second pair of electrodes comprising a second intra-electrode distance and configured at an inter-electrodes distance from the first pair of electrodes, a sorting zone configured downstream from said analyzing zone, and outlets configured downstream from said sorting zone; (ii) an electric source configured to provide a first electric signal to the first pair of electrodes and a second electric signal to the second pair of electrodes; (iii) a measuring device functionally coupled to the first pair of electrodes and functionally coupled to the second pair of electrodes, and configured to measure a first impedance as a function of time of the fluid between the first pair of electrodes, and to measure a second impedance as a function of time of the fluid between the second pair of electrodes, and to provide time-dependent impedance data based on the first impedance and the second impedance, wherein the time-dependent impedance data comprise differential signal curve data, wherein the differential signal curve data are provided by subtracting the second impedance as a function of time from the first impedance as a function of the time; (iv) a sorting device configured to sort sperm cells between morphological normal sperm cells and morphological abnormal sperm cells by directing the sperm cell in the sorting zone to one of the outlets based on a comparison in a comparison stage of the time dependent impedance data with predefined reference data, wherein in the comparison stage a differential signal curve of the differential signal curve data is compared with a differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells and a differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells.
2. The system according to claim 1, wherein the fluid further comprises a further particulate material, wherein the system comprises a further outlet, and wherein the sorting device is further configured to sort the further particulate material by directing the further particulate material in the sorting zone to one of the outlets based on a comparison in the comparison stage of the time dependent impedance data with predefined reference data.
3. The system according to claim 1, further comprising a focusing zone configured upstream from said analyzing zone and downstream from said inlet, and a second electromagnetic device to provide an electric field to the focusing zone, wherein the sorting device comprises a first electromagnetic device to provide an electric field to the sorting zone, and the first electromagnetic device is configured to direct the sperm cell by dielectrophoretic force to one of the outlets, and the second electromagnetic device is configured to direct the sperm cell in the focusing zone by dielectrophoretic force.
4. The system according to claim 1, wherein a first dimension selected from height and width of the fluid flow channel is selected from the range of 5-400 m and a second dimension selected from width and height of the fluid flow channel is selected in the range 5-400 m, and wherein a cross-sectional area is selected from the range of 100-10,000 m.sup.2.
5. The system according to claim 1, wherein the reference data contain information on the presence or absence of a cytoplasmic droplet.
6. The system according to claim 1, wherein the inter-electrodes distance is selected from the range of 10-100 m and the time-dependent impedance data are based on a difference between an absolute value of the first impedance at a time and an absolute value of the second impedance at said time.
7. The system according to claim 1, wherein (i) the first pair of electrodes are configured at two opposite sides of the flow channel, with the flow channel in between, and the second pair of electrodes are configured at two opposite sides of the flow channel, with the flow channel in between.
8. The system according to claim 1, wherein the first intra-electrode distance and the second intra-electrode distance are substantially the same.
9. The system according to claim 1, wherein in the comparison stage a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data is compared with a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells and a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells, wherein the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells shows a positive and a negative peak, and wherein the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells shows an additional peak between the negative peak and tailing of the negative peak.
10. The system according to claim 1, wherein in the comparison stage an area under the differential signal curve is compared with an area under the differential signal curve of normal sperm cells and an area under the differential signal curve of abnormal sperm cells.
11. The system according to claim 1, wherein the sorting device directs an abnormal sperm cell to one of the outlets and a normal sperm cell to another outlet.
12. A method for sorting sperm cells in a fluid between morphological normal sperm cells and morphological abnormal sperm cells, the method comprising: (i) providing a fluid flow comprising the sperm cells into a fluid flow channel, wherein the fluid flow channel comprises a first pair of electrodes and a second pair of electrodes comprising a second intra-electrode distance and configured at an inter-electrodes distance from the first pair of electrodes; (ii) providing a first electric signal to the first pair of electrodes and providing a second electric signal to the second pair of electrodes; (iii) measuring a first impedance as a function of time of the fluid between the first pair of electrodes, and measuring a second impedance as a function of time of the fluid between the second pair of electrodes, and providing time-dependent impedance data based on the first impedance and the second impedance, wherein the time-dependent impedance data comprise differential signal curve data, wherein the differential signal curve data are provided by subtracting the second impedance as a function of time from the first impedance as a function of the time; (iv) sorting the sperm cells between morphological normal sperm cells and morphological abnormal sperm cells based on comparing the time-dependent impedance data with predefined reference data in a comparison stage, wherein in the comparison stage a differential signal curve of the differential signal curve data is compared with a differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells and a differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells.
13. The method according to claim 12, further comprising focusing the sperm cell in the fluid flow channel at a location upstream of the first pair of electrodes and wherein focusing the sperm cell comprises either (i) providing a further fluid flow of a support material into the fluid flow channel to envelop the sperm cell with the further fluid flow or (ii) providing a non-uniform electric field to the sperm cell to direct the sperm cell in the fluid flow.
14. The method according to claim 12, wherein measuring the impedance comprises measuring the impedance at a frequency selected from the range of 10 kHz-100 MHz.
15. The method according to claim 12, wherein sorting sperm cells based on comparing the time-dependent impedance data with predefined reference data comprises comparing the time-dependent impedance data with a symmetric curve.
16. The method according to claim 12, wherein the fluid comprises sperm cells in a concentration of 2.Math.10.sup.3-2.Math.10.sup.8 cells/ml and wherein the sperm cells are selected from the group of cattle sperm cells consisting of boar sperm cells and bull sperm cells.
17. The method according to claim 12, wherein comparing in the comparison stage comprises comparing a processed area under the differential signal curve with reference data of a processed area under the differential signal curve for morphological normal sperm cells and for morphological abnormal sperm cells, wherein the processed areas under the curves are provided by normalizing the respective differential signal curve based on a peak height (YB) and a peak width (XB), wherein the peak height (YB) is a minimal impedance signal value of a negative peak of the respective curve and the peak width (XB) is the corresponding measuring time at the peak height (YB) minus the measuring time corresponding to a start of the negative peak.
18. The method according to claim 12, wherein in the comparison stage a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data is compared with a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells and a shape of the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells, wherein the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of normal sperm cells shows a positive and a negative peak, and wherein the differential signal curve of differential signal curve data of abnormal sperm cells shows an additional peak between the negative peak and tailing of the negative peak.
19. The method according to claim 12, wherein in the comparison stage an area under the differential signal curve is compared with an area under the differential signal curve of normal sperm cells and an area under the differential signal curve of abnormal sperm cells.
20. The method according to claim 12, wherein during the sorting an abnormal sperm cell is directed to one of the outlets and a normal sperm cell is directed to another outlet.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying schematic drawings in which corresponding reference symbols indicate corresponding parts, and in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7) Corresponding reference symbols used in the description and in the figures indicate the same or corresponding parts. The schematic drawings are not necessarily on scale.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS
(8) The method and the system of the invention as described herein are especially based on several functions that may advantageously be combined in different embodiments. The main function, especially, comprises a system and a method for analyzing a characteristic of a sperm cell flowing in a fluid channel, especially analyzing the sperm cell for abnormalities. Especially, analyzing comprises analyzing the impedance measurements performed with electrodes provided in the flow channel at an analyzing zone, wherein the impedance of a flowing fluid comprising the sperm cell over time is used to provide time-dependent impedance data, for instance comprising (a shape of) an impedance measuring curve. The time-dependent impedance data may be provided using one pair of electrodes as well as using two pairs of electrodes or using further pairs of electrodes. Herein a shape of an impedance measurement curve may indicate morphological properties (or other characteristics) of the individual cell passing by the electrodes or it may indicate other (particulate) material passing the electrodes. Especially this functionality may be combined with a second functionality, i.e. a sorting to redirect a (abnormal) sperm cell downstream of the analyzing zone when a specific parameter (characteristic) of that sperm cell, such as a (morphological) abnormality is identified. However, the system and method may also be used to analyze (or identify) only, without performing a sorting or separating action. A third functionality comprises focusing, wherein a sperm cell flowing in the flow channel may be directed to a specific location in the fluid channel, especially to substantially standardize the location of the sperm cell when it enters/is present in the analyzing zone. This focusing may for instance comprise ultrasound, dielectrophoresis, or the use of different liquid streams (hydro-dynamic focusing). The system and the method may be used for instance for identifying the presence and/or absence of sperm cells comprising a cytoplasmic droplet wherein the method is used to improve the viability of sperm. Using the system and/or the method described herein may provide purified (cattle or pig) sperm having less than 10% sperm cells with cytoplasmic droplet relative to the total number of sperm cells.
(9)
(10) In a specific embodiment (not shown, however, that may be explained with the embodiment depicted in
(11) To perform impedance measurements an electric source 140 is connected to the electrode(s) (41 alone or) 41,42 to provide an electric signal to one of the electrodes 41a, 42a of a pair of electrodes 41,42 (in embodiments at least to the first pair of electrodes 41, but in other embodimentslike the one in
(12) Terms like outlets 80,90, . . . and outlets 80,90,100 . . . especially indicate at least two outlets, though more are possible, and at least three outlets, though more are possible, respectively.
(13) The sorting device 51 is especially configured to sort sperm cells 6 by directing the sperm cell 6 in the sorting zone 50 to one of the outlets 80, 90, 100 . . . based on a comparison in a comparison stage of the time-dependent impedance data with predefined reference data. Using the embodiment given in
(14) Preferably, (sequentially passing) sperm cells 6 are all located in the substantially the same location at the moment they enter the analyzing zone 40. To enable positioning (focusing), especially at the fluid flow channel axis 63, the sperm cells 6 in the focusing zone 20 are especially directed by a focusing device 21 to the fluid flow channel axis 63. The focusing functionality may be provided by dielectrophoretic forces provided by a second electromagnetic device 22 as is depicted in
(15)
(16)
(17) In
(18) In
(19)
(20)
EXPERIMENTAL
(21) Materials and Methods
(22) Chip Fabrication
(23) Microfluidic chips were fabricated using routine photolithography wet etch, sputter and bonding techniques. After cleaning two borofloat glass wafers (BF33, 100 mm diameter, 500 and 1100 m thick), microelectrodes were fabricated after resist deposition, exposure and developing, BHF wet-etching, deposition of titanium/platinum layers (layer thickness 30 and 120 nm, respectively) and resist lift-off. Subsequently, inserts for fluidic and electric connections were powder blasted through both wafers (particle size 30 m). After cleaning the wafers using ultrasound and HNO.sub.3, a layer of foil (20 m, PerMX3020, Dupont) was laminated on the 500 m wafers at 80 C. After lamination, the wafers were pre-baked (5 min at 50 C., 5 min at 65 C. and 10 min at 85 C.) to improve adhesion of the foil to the glass. Exposure was performed using a 12 mW/cm.sup.2 UV source. Subsequently, a post-exposure bake was performed (5 min at 50 C., 5 min at 65 C. and 10 min at 85 C.). The polymer layer was developed using a spin-coater. After aligning the 500 m wafers with respect to the 1100 m wafers using a bond chuck, they were bonded together using an anodic bonder. Subsequently, the wafer stack was hard-baked in a heated press. After dicing, the chips were ready to use. Two different chips designs were used in the described experiments. For the electrical analysis of the sperm morphology, differential impedance measurements were performed in a 20 m high and 20 m wide channel containing two electrode pairs with an electrode width of 10 m and a separation of 20 or 40 m. Impedance based cell sorting experiments were performed in a 20 m high and 100 m wide channel using a single electrode pair with a width of 20 or 50 m.
(24) Sample and Chip Preparation
(25) Fresh boar semen was obtained from a local artificial insemination center at a concentration of 2010.sup.6 cells ml.sup.1. The samples were diluted with Beltsville Thawing Solution (BTS) to a concentration of 510.sup.6 cells ml.sup.1. Before each experiment, the microfluidic channel was coated with poly(L-lysine)-grafted-poly(ethylene glycol) (PLL-g-PEG) to prevent cell adhesion. PLL-g-PEG was rinsed through the channel at a concentration of 100 g ml.sup.1 in DI water for at least 15 min at a flow rate of 0.5-1 l/min using a syringe pump. BTS solution was rinsed for at least 15 min at a flow rate of 0.5-1 l/min to remove remaining coating solution. Subsequently sperm solution was flushed through the channel at a flow rate of 0.5-1 l/min. Upon visualization in the microfluidic channel, the flow rate was changed to 0.013-0.75 l/min before impedance acquisition.
(26) Impedance Detection and Analysis
(27) Impedance was recorded using a Zurich HF2IS impedance spectroscope equipped with a HF2TA preamplifier (also depicted in
(28) Cell Focusing and Sorting Using Dielectrophoresis
(29) The sperm cell orientation and location within the micro channels was processed using dielectrophoresis (DEP). Cell focusing was performed by applying a 10 MHz, 6V.sub.pp sinusoidal excitation on the focusing electrodes (Agilent X) unless mentioned otherwise. Similarly, cell sorting was performed by identical excitation using the Aux1 output of the impedance spectroscope.
(30) Image Analysis
(31) Sperm tracking was performed using the motion-based multiple object tracking function of the computer vision system toolbox in Matlab. This function processes every frame one by one and detects objects by comparison to a static background. These objects are tracked over time and assigned to object trajectories. This readily available function in Matlab was adapted to allow storage of objects' time data, location and size. To investigate the effect of the sperm location and size on the impedance, this data was matched to acquired impedance data.
(32) Integrated Data Acquisition and DEP Sorting Using LabVIEW
(33) Sorting sperm cells using DEP based on impedance data requires a control system which combines both techniques. Furthermore, this system must allow control over the syringe pump and acquisition of optical data for verification purposes. Fortunately, virtual instrument (VI) drivers are available for all involved equipment. These drivers take care of low-level communication between the computer (LabVIEW) and the instruments, and contain high-level functions to control them. At start up of the LabVIEW control program, the impedance spectroscope, pump and camera are initialized when selected in the user interface. After configuration of the instruments and initiation of the experiment, the experimental data (video and impedance) and instrument reports are saved automatically. Since the video and impedance measurements are time-stamped within the program, corresponding data files are synchronized. In sorting mode, the control program monitors the impedance over time. Upon particle or cell passing, there is a change in impedance.
(34) Simulation
(35) The electrical response of the microfluidic setup was investigated by constructing a numerical model of the circuit in Matlab. This model is well described in literature and is based on Foster and Schwan's simplified electrical circuit model (ECM) for a single-shelled spheroid in suspension. In simulations, a parallel electrode configuration was modelled without field fringing at the electrode edges. Furthermore, sperm cells were modelled as spheroids with equal cell volume (1.2110.sup.15 m.sup.3).
(36) Results
(37) Electrical Circuit Model
(38) Impedance spectroscopy is a commonly used tool for label-free analysis of adherent cells or cells in suspension. This technique has been used extensively to investigate the dielectric properties of cells in microfluidic systems. Constructing an electrical circuit model (ECM) is a simple way to gain insight into the electrical response of the microfluidic setup (
(39) Impedance Analysis of Cell Orientation and Morphology
(40) Impedance analysis was performed by flowing sperm cells through a 20 m high, 100 m wide microfluidic channel with a 20 m wide channel restriction at a flow rate between 0.013 and 0.02 l min.sup.1. The impedance was recorded differentially with two electrode pairs with an electrode width of 10 m and an electrode separation of 20. After calculating the difference between the electrical responses of both electrode pairs, baseline correction and peak detection were performed. The resulting peak height distribution showed good agreement with the simulated change of impedance in case of a single sperm passing the electrodes. However, this distribution showed a big spread in data, ranging from values between 200 and 2500. Factors which influence the width of this distribution are e.g. the cell orientation, location and cellular properties. Due to these factors, the absolute impedance change is not a suitable parameter to characterize morphological differences. A different approach is the analysis of the peak shape over time. A sperm cell has a very distinct shape and its typical length is larger compared to the microchannel geometries (width and length) and the width of the microelectrodes. When a sperm cell is flown through this microchannel, the cell will align itself over its longitudinal axis with respect to the channel wall. Consequently, the distinct parts of the sperm cell (head, midpiece and flagellum) will pass the electrical field between the microelectrodes at different points in time and will affect the recorded impedance, accordingly. As a result, the peak shape may contain information about the cell orientation and its morphology.
(41) To test this hypothesis, the impedance peak shape of passing sperm cells was investigated (using an electrode separation of 20 m). The spectra showed a positive and negative peak (
(42) One way to extract information regarding cytoplasmic droplet content from the impedance data is to analyze the area under the curve (AUC). In total, 18 morphologically normal and 18 droplet-containing sperm cells were selected for analysis. Using Matlab, the maximum (
(43) TABLE-US-00001 AUC Std AUC.sub.norm Std.sub.norm Control 2.96e4 1.50e4 5.05e3 7.25e2 Droplet 2.6e4 1.58e4 6.98e4 2.36e3 p = 0.52 p = 0.003* * = 0.01
Effect of Dielectrophoretic Focusing on Cell Location and Velocity
(44) Cell location and velocity are important parameters to control in the design of a cell sorting system. Defined cell location and velocity are necessary to perform accurate measurements of the sperm morphology and to control cell sorting after analysis. Dielectrophoretic focusing is used to control these parameters. To show the effect of DEP focusing on the cell location, sperm cells were flown through the microfluidic channel with and without DEP excitation. Without DEP excitation, the distribution of sperm cells within the channel is random. With DEP excitation, the sperm cells were clearly deflected to the middle of the channel, which is confirmed by a small distribution of Y-location. The velocity of the sperm cells was investigated near the impedance electrodes. The cell location and velocity were determined right after passing the 20 m electrode pair. Impedance data was matched to the video data to investigate the effect of the velocity, orientation and location. First of all, the cell velocity and location were investigated with and without DEP focusing. Without focusing, image analysis showed broad distributions in cell location and velocity (the middle of the channel was positioned at approximately 64 m; the channel borders are positioned at approximately 12 and 116 m). With focusing, the width of these distributions was reduced extensively as can be observed especially from smaller differences between the median value and the first and third quartile values (i.e. interquartile distance) found after focusing compared to the difference observed without focusing see table below: It is noted that no significant effects of the mean cell velocity and location were observed on the recorded impedance.
(45) TABLE-US-00002 First Third Median quartile quartile Min Max Focused Location (m) 61.3 59.1 63.1 18.4 101.7 (n = 456) Velocity (m/s) 322.4 299.7 338.1 0.7 393.5 Non-focused Location (m) 51.3 37.7 66.0 15.0 101.7 (n = 392) Velocity (m/s) 286.4 232.1 329.0 0.3 397.6
Impedance-Controlled Sorting of Sperm Cells
(46) The next step in the development of a label-free cell sorting system is the design of an algorithm which is able to actively sort sperm cells based on impedance detection. As a proof-of-concept experiment, the beads and sperm cells have been sorted based on impedance. LabVIEW was chosen as development platform. After focusing and detection, the beads and sperm cells must be actively sorted. The LabVIEW program monitors the impedance continuously. Whenever a change in impedance is recorded, from which the peak shape matches the peak template, the width and the height of the peak are determined. The peak width is used to calculate the particle's velocity in order to predict the estimated time of arrival (ETA) at the sorting electrodes. The total peak height determines whether a particle is sorted or not. This selection is based on the impedance window of interest (WOI). In this example, 3 m polystyrene beads will be sorted from sperm cells. A mixture of sperm cells and beads was flown through the microfluidic channel at a flow rate of approximately 0.025 L min.sup.1. The impedance WOI was set to 4-8 Ohm, which matches the impedance change when a bead passes the electrodes. The average impedance change of sperm cells is approximately 17 Ohms, which is above the WOI. Whenever an impedance change of a particle is detected, which fits within the WOI, the DEP electrodes are activated to sort the particle in the top channel. When beads pass the electrodes, impedance peaks were recorded within the WOI, consequently sorting the beads actively in the top channel at the channel split. Whenever sperm cells or debris passed the detection electrodes, the recorded impedance was above or below the WOI. As a result, sperm cells and debris were drawn in the bottom channel without being deflected by the sorting electrodes. The sorting speed in the described experiment was low (<1 sperm cell s.sup.1) due to low bead and sperm concentrations and small flow rates. Furthermore, the sorting speed of this system is limited to approximately 5 cells s.sup.1 due to limitations in the computational speed of the LabVIEW software. However sorting was about 100% effective.
(47) The term substantially herein, such as in substantially consists, will be understood by the person skilled in the art. The term substantially may also include embodiments with entirely, completely, all, etc. Hence, in embodiments the adjective substantially may also be removed. Where applicable, the term substantially may also relate to 90% or higher, such as 95% or higher, especially 99% or higher, even more especially 99.5% or higher, including 100%. The term comprise includes also embodiments wherein the term comprises means consists of. The term and/or especially relates to one or more of the items mentioned before and after and/or. For instance, a phrase item 1 and/or item 2 and similar phrases may relate to one or more of item 1 and item 2. The term comprising may in an embodiment refer to consisting of but may in another embodiment also refer to containing at least the defined species and optionally one or more other species.
(48) Furthermore, the terms first, second, third and the like in the description and in the claims, are used for distinguishing between similar elements and not necessarily for describing a sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the terms so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances and that the embodiments of the invention described herein are capable of operation in other sequences than described or illustrated herein.
(49) The devices herein are amongst others described during operation. As will be clear to the person skilled in the art, the invention is not limited to methods of operation or devices in operation. It should be noted that the above-mentioned embodiments illustrate rather than limit the invention, and that those skilled in the art will be able to design many alternative embodiments without departing from the scope of the appended claims. In the claims, any reference signs placed between parentheses shall not be construed as limiting the claim.
(50) Use of the verb to comprise and its conjugations does not exclude the presence of elements or steps other than those stated in a claim. The article a or an preceding an element does not exclude the presence of a plurality of such elements.
(51) The invention may be implemented by means of hardware comprising several distinct elements, and by means of a suitably programmed computer. In the device claim enumerating several means, several of these means may be embodied by one and the same item of hardware. The mere fact that certain measures are recited in mutually different dependent claims does not indicate that a combination of these measures cannot be used to advantage.
(52) The invention further applies to a device comprising one or more of the characterizing features described in the description and/or shown in the attached drawings.
(53) The invention further pertains to a method or process comprising one or more of the characterizing features described in the description and/or shown in the attached drawings.
(54) The various aspects discussed in this patent can be combined in order to provide additional advantages. Further, the person skilled in the art will understand that embodiments can be combined, and that also more than two embodiments can be combined. Furthermore, some of the features can form the basis for one or more divisional applications.