Alloy for pressure die-casting

10669615 ยท 2020-06-02

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

An aluminium, magnesium and silicon-based die casting alloy having 5.0-7.0 wt. % magnesium, 1.5-7.0 wt. % silicon, 0.3-0.8 wt. % manganese, 0.03-0.5 wt. % iron, 0.01-0.4 wt. % molybdenum, 0.01-0.3 wt. % zirconium, 0-0.25 wt. % titanium, 0-0.25 wt. % strontium, 0-250 ppm phosphorus, 0-4 wt. % copper and 1-10 wt. % zinc, the remainder being aluminium and inevitable impurities.

Claims

1. An aluminium-magnesium-silicon-based alloy for pressure die casting, consisting of: TABLE-US-00004 magnesium 5.0-7.0% by weight silicon 1.5-4.0% by weight iron 0.03-0.5% by weight manganese 0.3-0.8% by weight zirconium 0.01-0.4% by weight molybdenum 0.01-0.4% by weight vanadium 0.01-0.03% by weight beryllium 0.001-0.005% by weight titanium 0-0.15% by weight strontium 0-0.1% by weight phosphorus 0-250 ppm copper 0-4% by weight zinc 0-10% by weight the remainder being aluminium and unavoidable impurities.

2. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein molybdenum is 0.05 to 0.20% by weight.

3. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein zirconium is 0.05 to 0.20% by weight.

4. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein silicon is 2.0 to 3.0% by weight.

5. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein magnesium is 5.5 to 6.5% by weight.

6. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein titanium is 0-0.08% by weight.

7. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein iron is 0.05 to 0.2% by weight.

8. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein copper is 0-0.2% by weight.

9. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein zinc is 0-0.5% by weight.

10. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein strontium is 0-0.01% by weight.

11. A structural component comprising an alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1.

12. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein magnesium is 5.0-6.21% by weight.

13. The alloy for pressure die casting according to claim 1, wherein silicon is 1.5-2.61% by weight.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(1) The present invention is directed to an alloy for pressure die casting comprising or consisting of: magnesium 5.0-7.0% by weight, silicon 1.5-4.0% by weight, iron 0.03-0.5% by weight, manganese 0.3-0.8% by weight, zirconium 0.01-0.4% by weight, molybdenum 0.01-0.4% by weight, vanadium 0.01-0.03% by weight, beryllium 0.001-0.005% by weight, titanium 0-0.15% by weight, strontium 0-0.1% by weight, phosphorus 0-250 ppm, copper 0-4% by weight, zinc 0-10% by weight and the remainder being aluminium and unavoidable impurities.

(2) Initially, the Mg and Si contents were varied to find an MgSi ratio suitable for the more demanding requirements. Increasing the Mg provided a strength increase, but starting at 6.5% a noticeable reduction in the elongation at break had to be taken into account. The additional increase in Si resulted in an increase of the eutectic fraction of the alloy, which did not yield any technical benefits. Over and above a Mg:Si ratio of 2:1 there is a significant loss in elongation at break.

(3) It is known that the solubility of Mg.sub.2Si decreases with increasing Mg content. Moreover, during slow solidification, coarse-grained Mg.sub.2Si particles form that have an adverse effect on mechanical properties. These relationships were confirmed in the present investigations.

(4) It is also known that there is a change in the eutectic phase function up to a silicon content of 2.5%, but no change in the solidification temperature. This relationship is used in the alloy according to the present invention.

(5) It is known that the Mg.sub.2Si which accumulates at the grain boundaries results in worsening of the corrosion behaviour. Since the alloy according to the present invention is used in pressure die-casting, rapid solidification occurs, which greatly reduces grain boundary segregation to a corresponding degree and in this way compensates for this adverse effect.

(6) Starting from an optimized MgSi ratio, a series of additional elements was added, among them Cu, Zn, Mo, Zr, V and Ti.

(7) Titanium and zirconium are known as grain refiners. On the whole, the interplay of the elements mentioned represents an important basis for the alloy according to the present invention.

(8) On addition of the elements Zn and Cu, high yield strengths of over 400 MPa can be achieved, especially after heat treatment, but at quite low elongation values of 4-5%.

(9) It was determined that, compared to the comparative alloy from EP 0 853 133B1, the strength-increasing effect resulted especially from high-melting-point phases formed by the elements Mo and Zr in conjunction with V and Ti. On the one hand, separation of these phases from the melt is to be avoided, during production of the alloy as well as during the casting process. On the other hand, they should solidify first during casting in order to achieve a fine microstructure in this way and good mechanical properties as a result. Preferably, the titanium content should be maintained between 0-0.08% by weight.

(10) The alloy according to the present invention has been developed primarily for pressure die-casting and the typical solidification conditions encountered there. The size and extent of high-melting-point phases always depends on the solidification conditions. During pressure die-casting, solidification usually already begins in the shot chamber, continues during filling of the die and ends in thick-walled regions, frequently only after removal of the part.

(11) To further increase the strength of the alloy according to the present invention without large losses in the elongation values, a T5 heat treatment is included.

(12) If Cu and Zn are also added to the alloy according to the present invention, a T6 or a T7 heat treatment is included. Compared to the reference alloy from EP 0 853 133B1, a definite increase in strength and yield point could be achieved in this case, but with a noticeable reduction in the elongation at break.

(13) One embodiment of the alloy according to the present invention includes the addition of secondary aluminium in the form of recycled material. Preferably, the amount of secondary aluminium should account for 50% of the aluminium base alloy needed for production of the alloy. The term recycled material should be understood to mean, for instance: wheels, extruded profiles, sheet and metal chips of aluminium alloys. With the alloy composition according to the present invention, it is possible, up to an iron content of 0.20% by weight, to meet the requirements for crash-relevant structural components; over 0.20% by weight iron allows use in the area of strength-relevant structural components.

(14) The slight increase in iron content is addressed by reducing the manganese fraction. The risk of sludge forming in the holding furnace of the casting machine can be mitigated in this way.

(15) The tendency of the alloy to stick in the casting die drops nevertheless, as both iron and manganese act beneficially in this regard and the reduction in Mn is more than compensated by the Fe content. Furthermore, the MnFe ratio prevents the formation of so-called beta phases, i.e. platelet-shaped AlMnFeSi precipitates that crucially reduce the ductility of the material. Such precipitates can be seen under the microscope as so-called iron needles.

(16) A cyclic salt spray test (ISO 9227) and an intercrystalline corrosion test (ASTM G110-92) were used to check the corrosion tendency. The composition of the alloy according to the present invention has been selected so that in the case of the low-Cu and low-Zn variant very good corrosion resistance can be detected.

(17) In punch riveting tests, the alloy according to the present invention could be riveted without cracking despite its high strength.

EXAMPLES

(18) The compositions of a comparable alloy as disclosed in EP 0 853 133B1 (Alloy 1) and three illustrative embodiments (Alloys A, B and C) of the alloy according to the present invention are compared hereinafter. The data are presented as % by weight. Using these three alloys, the mechanical characteristics (R.sub.m, Rp.sub.0.2 and A.sub.5) were measured on pressure die-cast 3 mm plates. The mean value from 8 tensile tests is presented. The results were determined in the cast state (State F), in the T5 state (controlled cooling with subsequent artificial aging) and in the T6 state (solution annealing with full artificial aging).

(19) TABLE-US-00002 Mg Si Mn Fe Cu Zn Alloy 1 5.79 2.34 0.66 0.09 0.001 0.01 Alloy A 6.31 2.50 0.69 0.10 0.002 0.00 Alloy B 6.21 2.61 0.46 0.19 0.02 0.03 Alloy C 5.25 2.19 0.64 0.10 0.20 5.62 Ti V Be Zr Mo P Alloy 1 0.083 0.028 0.0027 0.000 0.000 0.0002 Alloy A 0.006 0.013 0.0028 0.081 0.050 0.0002 Alloy B 0.004 0.015 0.0023 0.100 0.068 0.0002 Alloy C 0.150 0.022 0.0004 0.001 0.001 0.0004

(20) Results Achieved

(21) TABLE-US-00003 Rm RP.sub.0.2 A.sub.5 [N/mm.sup.2] [N/mm.sup.2] [%] F state Alloy 1 315 179 11.5 Alloy A 355 213 10.7 Alloy B 342 209 9.2 Alloy C 375 265 4.9 T5 state Alloy 1 313 213 9.0 Alloy A 370 236 10.1 Alloy B 354 232 8.5 Alloy C 370 279 3.4 T6 state Alloy 1 292 186 9.0 Alloy C 429 363 4.4