METHOD FOR ISOLATING EXTRACELLULAR VESICLES USING CATIONS
20200164284 ยท 2020-05-28
Inventors
- Yong Song GHO (Gyeongsangbuk-do, KR)
- Chang Jin Lee (Daegu, KR)
- Ji Hyun KIM (Gyeongsangbuk-do, KR)
- Sung Hyun SONG (Gyeonggi-do, KR)
Cpc classification
C12N5/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
B01D15/36
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
The present invention relates to a method for isolating extracellular vesicles using cations, and more particularly, to a method for isolating extracellular vesicles from various samples by using the affinity between the extracellular vesicles and cations. A method for isolating extracellular vesicles according to the present invention does not require expensive equipment, can be applied irrespective of sample amount, and has the advantage of being capable of efficiently isolating the extracellular vesicles while preserving the shape or characteristics thereof. Moreover, the method according to the present invention can be combined with existing isolation methods to maximize extracellular vesicle isolation efficiency, and can be applied to disease diagnosis, disease treatment, and multi-omics research using isolated extracellular vesicles, as well as to research on the properties of extracellular vesicles.
Claims
1. A method for isolating extracellular vesicles, the method comprising: (a) adding cations to a biological sample; (b) reacting the cations with extracellular vesicles contained in the biological sample to form an extracellular vesicle-cation complex; (c) separating the extracellular vesicle-cation complex from the sample; and (d) separating the cations from the complex to purify extracellular vesicles.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the biological sample is at least one selected from the group consisting of mammalian cell culture medium, bacterial cell culture medium, yeast culture medium, a tissue extract, a cancer tissue, serum, blood plasma, saliva, tears, sweat, urine, feces, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), ascites, amniotic fluid, semen, milk, dust, fresh water, seawater, soil, and a fermented food.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cations are metal cations.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein step (c) is performed by using at least one selected from the group consisting of centrifugation, ultracentrifugation, filtration, ultrafiltration, gravity, sonication, density gradient ultracentrifugation, size-exclusion chromatography, ion-exchange chromatography, affinity chromatography, polymer-based precipitation, and organic solvent precipitation.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein step (d) comprises at least one selected from the group consisting of: adding a chelating agent to the separated extracellular vesicle-cation complex; changing a pH value; and changing the concentration of at least one selected from the group consisting of imidazole, histidine, ethylenediamine tetraacetate (EDTA), and a salt.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the chelating agent is at least one selected from the group consisting of iminodiacetic acid (IDA), nitrilotriacetic acid (NTA), tris-(carboxymethyl)ethylenediamine (TED), ethylenediamine, ethylendiamine tetraacetate (EDTA), alkylene diamine triacetic acid, diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (DTPA), ethylene glycol-bis(-aminoethyl ether)-N,N,N,N-tetraacetic acid (EGTA), phosphoserine, and 1,4,7-triazocyclononane (TACN).
7. The method of claim 1, further comprising pre-treating the sample before step (a).
8. The method of claim 1, further comprising post-treating the purified extracellular vesicles after step (d).
9. The method of claim 1, further comprising adding a polymer or salting-out ions in step (a).
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the polymer or salting-out ion are added before, simultaneously with, or after the addition of the cations.
11. The method of claim 9, wherein the polymer is polyethylene glycol (PEG) or polyoxazoline.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the polyoxazoline is poly(2-methyl-2-oxazoline) (PMOZ), poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOZ), or poly(2-propyl-2-oxazoline) (PPOZ).
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053] (
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0065] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to examples.
[0066] These examples are intended to only illustrate the present invention, and it would be obvious to those skilled in the art that the scope of the present invention is not construed as being limited to the examples.
EXAMPLE 1
Purification and Analysis of Sample Extracellular Vesicles
[0067] A colorectal cancer cell SW480 culture was centrifuged at 500g for 10 min (repeated twice in total) to remove remaining cells and precipitates. The supernatant was again centrifuged at 2,000g for 20 min (repeated twice in total) to remove precipitates.
[0068] To primarily purify and precipitate extracellular vesicles present in the supernatant, the supernatant was subjected to addition of an extracellular vesicle precipitation-inducing solution (8.4% polyethylene glycol 6000, 250 mM NaCl, 20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4), stored in a refrigerator for 16 hrs, and centrifuged at 12,000g for 30 min to harvest the precipitated extracellular vesicles, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline (20 mM HEPES, 150 mM NaCl, pH 7.4).
[0069] To secondarily purify extracellular vesicles using density and buoyancy, the sample was mixed with Optiprep (to a final concentration of 30%), and placed at the lowest layer in an ultracentrifugation container, and then 20% OptiPrep and 5% OptiPrep were layered thereon in that order. After OptiPrep buoyant density gradient ultracentrifugation (30%, 20%, and 5% OptiPrep triple layers) at 200,000g for 2 hrs was performed, a zone having an equivalent density (1.08-1.12 g/ml) to extracellular vesicles after the ultracentrifugation was harvested.
[0070] To tertiarily purify the purified extracellular vesicles, the purified extracellular vesicles were loaded onto a column (10100 mm) charged with Sephacryl S500 by using HPLC equipment, followed by size-exclusion chromatography, thereby harvesting the finally purified extracellular vesicle fractions. The present procedure for isolating sample extracellular vesicles is shown in
[0071] As a result of analyzing the purified colorectal cancer cell-derived extracellular vesicles through the HPLC chromatogram, the 280-nm absorbance band was observed at 3.6 min in the molecular-size exclusion chromatography (
[0072] The extracellular vesicles finally purified from the colorectal cancer cell lines (SW480) by the above method were checked for morphology. As shown in
EXAMPLE 2
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Various Types of Cations with Several Concentrations
[0073] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of various types of cations (Ca.sup.2+, Cu.sup.2+, Zn.sup.2+) with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. As a result of analysis of the isolated extracellular vesicles by size-exclusion chromatography using an HPLC system, the sample extracellular vesicles were detected at 3.6 min and are shown in
[0074] As for the treatment concentrations of calcium, copper, and zinc cations added to the colorectal cancer cell cultures, it was verified that the 280-nm absorbance band detected at 3.6 min increased in proportion with the concentration of cations, and these results are shown in
EXAMPLE 3
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Copper Cations (Copper(II) Chloride)
[0075] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of copper cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis. For nanoparticle tracking analysis, the Nanosight LM10 instrument was used, and tracking and recording was made under the conditions of a camera level of 10 and a detection limit of 3 for 60 sec. For western blot analysis, the signal of CD9, which is a general extracellular vesicle marker, was analyzed after SDS electrophoresis.
[0076] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 4
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Copper Cations (Copper(II) Sulfate)
[0077] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of copper cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0078] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 5
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Cobalt Cations (Cobalt Chloride)
[0079] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of cobalt cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0080] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 6
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Manganese Cations (Manganese(II) Chloride)
[0081] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of manganese cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0082] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 7
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Manganese Cations (Manganese(II) Sulfate)
[0083] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of manganese cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0084] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 8
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Calcium Cations (Calcium Chloride)
[0085] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of calcium cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0086] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 9
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles Using Zinc Cations (Zinc Chloride)
[0087] Colorectal cancer cell cultures were subjected to addition of zinc cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0088] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 10
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles from Human Urine by Using Calcium Cations (Calcium Chloride)
[0089] Human urine was centrifuged at 2,000g for 15 min (repeated twice in total) to remove remaining precipitates. The supernatant was subjected to addition of calcium cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0090] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 11
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Human Urine by Using Manganese Cations (Manganese(II) Sulfate)
[0091] Human urine was centrifuged at 2,000g for 15 min (repeated twice in total) to remove remaining precipitates. The supernatant was subjected to addition of manganese cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0092] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 12
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles From Human Urine by Using Zinc Cations (Zinc Chloride)
[0093] Human urine was centrifuged at 2,000g for 15 min (repeated twice in total) to remove remaining precipitates. The supernatant was subjected to addition of zinc cations with several concentrations, followed by mixing and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10min, to thereby harvest precipitates, which were then dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were investigated by nanoparticle tracking analysis and western blot analysis.
[0094] As a result, it was shown in
EXAMPLE 13
Increased Isolation Efficiency of Extracellular Vesicles Through Combinations of Various Types of Cations (Copper(II) Chloride and Manganese(II) Sulfate) and Polymers
[0095] To compare the isolation efficiency of extracellular vesicles according to combinations of various cations and polymers, extracellular vesicles were isolated by addition of cations alone, a polymer alone, or both cations and a polymer.
[0096] Specifically, polyethylene glycol (PEG) or poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOZ) was used as a polymer for isolating extracellular vesicles, wherein only polyethylene glycol (PEG) was added to colorectal cancer cell cultures to reach a final concentration of 8.3%, or only poly(2-ethyl-2-oxazoline) (PEOZ) was added thereto to reach a final concentration of 10%. As for the polymer alone-added groups, extracellular vesicles were harvested through culture at room temperature for 10 min and at 4 C. for 16 hrs and then centrifugation.
[0097] As for the cation alone-added groups, only copper cations (CuCl.sub.2) or manganese cations (MnSO.sub.4) were added to the same cell cultures to reach a final concentration of 20 mM, followed by culture at room temperature for 10 min, and then centrifugation, to thereby harvest extracellular vesicles. Extracellular vesicles were harvested by culture at room temperature for 10min and then centrifugation also in cases where both the cations and the polymer were added. Thereafter, the precipitated extracellular vesicles were dissolved in the same volume of HEPES-buffered saline.
[0098] Nanoparticle tracking analysis was performed to compare the yields of extracellular vesicles harvested under the polymer alone, cations alone, or cation-polymer mixed conditions. As shown in
EXAMPLE 14
CD9 Analysis of Extracellular Vesicles According to Concentration of Copper Cations (Copper(II) Sulfate) and Polymer
[0099] Extracellular vesicles were harvested through centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min from: samples obtained by subjecting colorectal cancer cell cultures to addition of copper cations with various concentrations and polyethyl oxazoline to a final concentration of 10% and then culture at room temperature for 30 min; and a sample obtained by culture of the same cell culture with polyethyl oxazoline alone at 4 C. for 18 hrs. To investigate the yields of extracellular vesicles obtained under the respective conditions, the amount of the extracellular vesicle marker CD9 was analyzed through western blotting.
[0100] As shown in
EXAMPLE 15
Isolation of Extracellular Vesicles According to Combination of Ammonium Ssulfate and Copper Cations (Copper(II) Sulfate)
[0101] Extracellular vesicles were harvested through centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min from: samples obtained by adding ammonium sulfate to a final concentration of 1.5 M to a colorectal cancer cell culture, followed by culture at 4 C. for 30 min; samples obtained by adding copper cations (10 mM) alone to the same cell culture; and samples obtained by adding both copper cations and ammonium sulfate to the same cell cultures. Nanoparticle tracking analysis was performed to investigate the yields of extracellular vesicles obtained under the respective conditions.
[0102] As shown in
EXAMPLE 16
Comparison Between Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Using Polymer and Extracellular Vesicle Isolation Through Copper Cations
[0103] Following experiment was conducted to analyze differences in yield and purity between extracellular vesicle isolation using a polymer and extracellular vesicle isolation through a polymer-cation combination. For conventional isolation of extracellular vesicles from 10 ml of colorectal cancer cell cultures, polyethylene glycol (PEG) was added to a final concentration of 8.3%, followed by culture at 4 C. for 18 hrs and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, and then the precipitates were dissolved in HEPES-buffered saline (20 mM HEPES, pH7.2, 150 mM NaCl). Meanwhile, for the isolation according to the present invention, copper cations were added to the same volume cell cultures, followed by culture for 10 min and then centrifugation at 3,000g for 10 min, thereby obtaining precipitates, and then the precipitates were dissolved in HEPES buffered saline containing 50 mM EDTA. The samples containing extracellular vesicles isolated by the above method were subjected to additional separation by spin-based size-exclusion chromatography, and then analyzed by size-exclusion chromatography using HPLC system.
[0104] As shown in
[0105] Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the specific features, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that this description is only for a preferable embodiment and does not limit the scope of the present invention. Thus, the substantial scope of the present invention will be defined by the appended claims and equivalents thereof.