Control device with several control assemblies and haptic feedback, and process for manufacturing the control device
10664055 ยท 2020-05-26
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
G06F3/0488
PHYSICS
H10N30/20
ELECTRICITY
G06F3/016
PHYSICS
International classification
G06F3/041
PHYSICS
G06F3/0354
PHYSICS
Abstract
The present disclosure relates to a control device with at least one touch-sensitive input surface that can be activated for haptic feedback with an electromagnetic actuator, where the actuator comprises an actuator coil and an armature that is activated by energizing the actuator coil. The control device is divided into at least two control assemblies at least one of which has a touch-sensitive input surface and an armature connected therewith. These at least two control assemblies are installed at a minimum spacing from each other on a common circuit board, which in turn is connected with a common carrier element, whereby the armatures protrude through the circuit board with play. On each carrier element, an actuator coil at a spacing x from the armature of the respective control assembly is installed. The present disclosure also refers to a process for manufacturing the control device.
Claims
1. A process for manufacturing a control device with at least one touch-sensitive input surface that is activated for haptic feedback with an electromagnetic actuator, for which the actuator includes an actuator coil and an armature that is activated by energizing the actuator coil, the process comprising: providing at least two control assemblies, at least one of which comprises a touch-sensitive input surface and an assembly site for installing an armature; inserting the at least two control assemblies in an installation in which the control assemblies are aligned with a minimum spacing between each other; attaching a common circuit board to the at least two control assemblies, whereby the circuit board has at least one recess through which an armature passes; connecting a common carrier element with the at least two control assemblies and the circuit board, whereby one actuator coil is attached to the carrier element for a control assembly with a touch-sensitive input surface; installing one armature to the assembly site of each control assembly with touch-sensitive input surface, whereby the armature passes through the recess in the circuit board and is installed at a spacing from a corresponding actuator coil of the carrier element on the respective control assembly; and determining the spacing, wherein the spacing is taken into account in a calibration of the actuator.
2. The process of claim 1, wherein the carrier element is screw-connected right through the common circuit board with the control assemblies.
3. The process of claim 1, wherein the installation is removed after the carrier element is connected with the control assemblies and the circuit board.
4. The process of claim 1, further comprising: providing at least two armatures are, each of the at least two armatures having at least one connecting element for connecting the respective armatures to a control assembly with a touch-sensitive input surface, wherein the connecting element on both armatures is arranged differently; determining a spacing between the actuator coil and a predetermined point on the associated control assembly after connecting a carrier element to the at least two control assemblies and the circuit board; selecting an armature from among the at least two armatures, which when connected to the control assembly lies at an actual spacing from the actuator coil, which complies with a predetermined specification; and determining the actual spacing depending on the determined spacing; and attaching the selected armature to the control assembly, where in the armature is led through a recess in the common circuit board.
5. The process of claim 4, wherein the selected armature is at the actual spacing from the associated actuator coil that is greater than a predetermined target spacing X while having the smallest deviation from the target spacing.
6. The process of claim 4, wherein the at least one touch-sensitive input surface is activated for haptic feedback that is either parallel or orthogonal to the direction of an extension of the at least one touch-sensitive input surface.
Description
(1) Other advantages, special features and useful further developments of the present disclosure are described in the subclaims and by means of the attached drawings of preferred embodiments, where
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13) The present disclosure is described by means of an example in the form of a control device that can be installed in the mid panel of a motor vehicle. However, the present disclosure can also be applied in other kinds of control devices. The chosen control device is of U-shaped form with two lateral control units which can be operated by the driver or the front-seat passenger, each on their side of the vehicle. In the front section is a third control unit that can be operated by both persons.
(14) In this embodiment of a control device with several separate control units, each of the two lateral control units 11, 12 has a touch-sensitive input surface which can be activated for haptic feedback by means of electromagnetic actuators. For example, the touch-sensitive surface can be a touchpad or touchscreen. On the other hand, the third control unit 13 can be designed without such haptics. For example, the third control unit can comprise a rocker switch 14, a rotating drum 15 and a rotating reset 16.
(15) The control device 10 is thus divided into three separate control units which are installed together in the central panel. This arrangement can also be seen in
(16)
(17) Each control assembly 11, 12 has its own actuator such that the touch-sensitive input surfaces of the two control assemblies can be stimulated separately of each other. Since in this embodiment, the third control assembly has no haptics, no assembly site for an armature is necessary here. The prefabricated control assemblies 11 and 12 also do not have an armature yet which will only be installed at a later stage.
(18) The two control assemblies 11 and 12 are also comprised of several screw connections 40 and 41. In addition, several pins are provided on the third control assembly 13. In the embodiment of
(19) A fluid barrier (not shown) can be loosely laid over the thus prepared three control assemblies 11, 12 and 13. Then a common circuit board 50 is overlaid as
(20) A carrier element 60 is laid onto the thus positioned circuit board 50 as shown in
(21) After the positioning of carrier element 60, it is connected via circuit board 50 with the control assemblies 11, 12, 13. This is done for example via a screw connection with pins 31 and 32 of control assembly 13 and the screw connections 42 and 43 of control assemblies 11 and 12. The screw connections are at least led through clearance holes 55, 56 in circuit board 50 and through clearance holes 61, 62, 63 and 64 in carrier element 60. In this way, carrier element 60 is firmly connected with the three control assemblies 11, 12, 13, whereby circuit board 50 is held sandwiched between carrier element 60 and the three control assemblies 11, 12, 13.
(22) Subsequently, the bond thus formed can be taken from installation means 20. Before or after this removal, armatures 80 and 81 are installed on both control assemblies 11, 12 as is shown in schematic top view in
(23)
(24) In the view shown in
(25) In two or more control assemblies with touch-sensitive input surface and haptic feedback, several armatures are installed in the control device. For this, the armatures should preferably be installed at a predetermined spacing x from the actuator coils. In particular when flat armatures are used, it would otherwise be a disadvantage that the force produced by the actuator depends to a great degree on the spacing between the armature and the coil core.
(26) The present disclosure therefore provides that in case of a bond consisting of several control assemblies, a common circuit board and a carrier element as described, the spacing d between an actuator coil and a site on the corresponding control assembly is first determined. Depending on this spacing, a suitable armature is determined for each control assembly with which the required spacing x can be achieved as accurately as possible.
(27) For example, this spacing can be determined by means of a camera which takes a picture of the section between the actuator coil a section of the control assembly. Spacing d can be determined with the aid of reference points in the picture and an appropriate image evaluation. Preferably, this spacing d is transmitted to a computer unit (not shown) which uses distance d to determine an armature that suits the measured gap.
(28) To select a suitable armature, a quantity of at least two armatures is provided to be chosen from. These armatures are of different design such that the most suitable can be selected from the quantity of armatures.
(29) Flat armature 80 of
(30) For example,
(31) An actuator with an installed flat armature 81 is shown in
(32) Installation of armature 81 results in an actual spacing x between actuator coil 70 and flat armature 81. Preferably, a flat armature is selected from the quantity of available flat armatures whose actual spacing x deviates the least from a target spacing X. For example, this target spacing X depends on the predetermined maximum deviation of the flat armature. With this maximum deviation, the remaining spacing between the actuator coil and the flat armature is to be minimized, typically resulting in target spacings X of 0.1-0.8 mm.
(33) To ensure that the target spacing X does not fall below target, it can be provided that the flat armature chosen from the quantity of flat armatures is that in which the resulting actual spacing x is greater than a target spacing X and also has the least deviation from this target spacing X. Thus, a suitable flat armature is selected depending on the spacing d determined in the installation assembly in which the spacing x from the actuator coil after installation is the smallest possible while flat armature can still move freely within its maximum deviation after installation. Preferably, the target spacing X will not be zero.
(34) To allow such a selection of a suitable flat armature from the quantity of available flat armatures, the resulting actual spacing x is first determined which is due to various spacings x between actuator coil and a point on a control assembly. It is thus known for various spacings d which actual spacing x results when various flat armatures are installed.
(35) For each of the two control assemblies 11 and 12, the spacing d between the respective actuator coil 70, 71 and a site on the control assembly is determined, and the suitable flat armature is selected. It can therefore happen that a flat armature with a different arrangement of connecting elements 84, 85 is installed at the first control assembly 11 than at the second control assembly. For example, at control assembly 11 a flat armature 80 with lateral connecting elements 84, 85 can be installed while the flat armature 81 at the second control assembly 12 is a flat armature of another type with central connecting elements 84, 85.