Biodegradable composite insulation material

10655009 ยท 2020-05-19

Assignee

Inventors

Cpc classification

International classification

Abstract

The biodegradable composite insulation material is a composite of wood from the date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera) and polylactic acid. The composite may have up to 50 wt % date palm wood powder of maximum particle size of 212 m, the balance being polylactic acid (PLA). The composite may be prepared by melt blending the date palm wood powder with polylactic acid pellets in a twin screw extruder at 190 C., followed by compression molding the blend in a press or the like into the desired shape for building thermal insulation, and finally, annealing the molded product for three hours at 95 C. The composite material is biodegradable, thermally insulating, water-resistant and relatively strong.

Claims

1. A compression molded, blended, annealed biodegradable composite insulation material, consisting essentially of a composite of: date palm tree wood, wherein the composite comprises up to 50 wt % date palm tree wood; and polylactic acid, wherein the composite comprises particles of date palm tree wood powder embedded in a matrix of polylactic acid to form a blended mixture, the date palm tree wood particles have a diameter less than 212 m, wherein the blended mixture is compression molded and annealed to form the composite insulation material, further wherein the compression molding includes a plurality of cycles at temperatures between 100 C. and 185 C. and pressures between 0.5 tons and 3 tons and the annealing is in an oven at 95 C. for three hours.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 shows a plot of thermal conductivity of the biodegradable composite insulation material as a function of date wood content at 298K.

(2) FIG. 2 is a scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a biodegradable composite insulation material having 50 wt % date wood content, the balance being polylactic acid (PLA).

(3) FIG. 3 is a plot of density of the biodegradable composite insulation material as a function of date wood content

(4) FIG. 4 is a plot of water retention (%) of the biodegradable composite insulation material as a function of date wood content.

(5) FIG. 5 is a chart of compression strength (stress) of the biodegradable composite insulation material as a function of date wood content.

(6) FIG. 6 is a chart of compression modulus of the biodegradable composite insulation material as a function of date wood content.

(7) Similar reference characters denote corresponding features consistently throughout the attached drawings.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

(8) The biodegradable composite insulation material is a composite of wood from the date palm tree (Phoenix dactylifera) and polylactic acid. The composite may have up to 50 wt % date palm wood powder of maximum particle size of 212 m, the balance being polylactic acid (PLA). The composite may be prepared by melt blending the date palm wood powder with polylactic acid pellets in a twin screw extruder at 190 C., followed by compression molding the blend in a press or the like into the desired shape for building thermal insulation, and finally, annealing the molded product for three hours at 95 C.

(9) As used herein, unless otherwise indicated, the term date wood refers to material from the petiole, rachis, leaflets, thorns, spathe, bunch, pedicels and/or fibrillium of a date tree plant, including but not limited to Phoenix dactylifera, which is sometimes referred to as the date palm. The composite material finds particular utility as a thermal insulator in the building and construction industry.

(10) Date wood from any cultivar of date plant may be used in the composite. The date wood is dried and ground before use. The date wood may be ground using any suitable method available, including but not limited to the use of a ball mill, rod mill, autogenous mill, semi-autogenous (SAG) mill, pebble mill, high pressure grinding rolls, buhrstone mill, vertical shaft impactor (VSI) mill or tower mill. Preferably, the date wood is ground and optionally filtered (e.g., by mesh straining) such that the resulting date wood powder has particles with a maximum dimension of less than 212 m.

(11) The level of date wood in the composite material may be varied in order to modify the properties of the material as required. Typically, the composite material will comprise up to 50 wt % date wood.

(12) Polylactic acid is commercially available from a number of suppliers. It may be provided in solid form, as crystalline, semi-crystalline or amorphous. Preferably, the polylactic acid is a semi-crystalline polylactic acid in any form appropriate for use in an extruder or a compression mold, such as pellets, flakes, powder or granules. The polylactic acid may be dried before use in the composite material.

(13) The following examples will further illustrate the process for the preparation of the composite material and properties thereof.

Example 1

Synthesis of Biodegradable Composite Insulation Material

(14) Polylactic acid (PLA) in the form of semi-crystalline PLA 4032D was used in the following examples, supplied by Zhejiang Zhongfu Industrial Limited (Zhejiang, China). PLA 4032D was supplied in pellet form with an L-lactide:D-lactide ratio from 24:1 to 32:1, as reported by the manufacturer, and a molecular weight of 2.4110.sup.5 g/mol. The specific gravity of the PLA was reported as 1.24, and the melting point varied between 155-170 C. The average diameter size of the PLA pellets was 3.5 mm.

(15) The date wood (DW) in the following examples was obtained as date palm waste from date palm trees grown at the UAE University farm in Al Foha, UAE. In particular, the date palm waste used in the following examples was a mixture of three components of typical date palm waste, namely, leaflets, rachis, and fiber. The date palm wood was dried for a week at 90 C. in order to minimize moisture content. The dried date wood was crushed and ground using a commercial milling machine, and then it was sieved (i.e., mesh-strained) to remove particles with a maximum dimension greater than 212 m.

(16) The composite material was prepared as follows. PLA pellets were dried for two hours under vacuum at 90 C., and then placed in a desiccator for one hour prior to processing. DW was dried for a week at 90 C. to eliminate moisture. The dried DW was crushed, ground and mesh-strained to provide a DWP (date wood powder) with particles having a maximum dimension of 212 m. DWP at various weight percentages from 0 wt % (control) to 50 wt % was mixed with PLA by a mini-twin conical screw extruder (MiniLab Haake Rheomex CTW5, Germany) and poured into a steel mold coated with a Maximum Mold Release Wax, with mixing conditions: 190 C., 140 RPM for 3 minutes with a total batch size of 5 g. The steel mold was transferred to a compression molding machine.

(17) The protocol for compression molding depends upon the desired shape of the thermal insulation material. For the following mechanical and water retention testing, the composite material was molded into the shape of a cylinder as follows. Three cycles of compression molding were performed, including (i) 0.5 ton force applied at 180 C. for 16 minutes; (ii) 0.52 ton force applied at 185 C. for 10 minutes; and

(18) (iii) 3 ton force applied at 100 C. for 3:30 minutes. For thermal conductivity samples where the material was less thick, the compression molding protocol was modified as follows. Three cycles of compression molding were performed, including (i) 0.5 ton force applied at 180 C. for 5:20 minutes; (ii) 0.52 ton force applied at 185 C. for 4 minutes; and (iii) 3 ton force applied at 100 C. for 3:30 minutes.

(19) After compression molding, the samples were annealed by transferring the material from the molding machine to an oven and maintaining the temperature at 95 C. for about 3 hours. The annealing step helps to optimize the thermal insulation properties of the composite by minimizing crystal formation.

(20) The biodegradable composite insulation material, prepared as described above, was tested and evaluated using the following equipment and protocols. A thermal conductivity testing machine, Lasercomp FOX-200, was used to measure the thermal conductivity of the exemplary samples. A specific mold was fabricated according to the dimensions of the sample required by the Lasercomp heat-flow instrument. The dimensions of the samples were 110 mm110 mm3 mm. The measurement conditions follow the standard methods reported by ASTM C1045-07. The steady state method was used in these measurements, where the thermal conductivity was determined from measurements of the temperature gradient in the sample and the heat input. Each reported result is an average of three measurements.

(21) The bulk density of the exemplary prepared composites was measured on cylindrical specimens with 25.7 mm length and 12.3 mm diameter. The density was calculated as the ratio of specimen weight to specimen volume, wherein the mass determination was carried out by weighing the specimens on an analytical balance. For all specimens, the average of three measurements was reported.

(22) The water retention of each sample was measured in accordance with ASTM D570-98. Cylindrical specimens with 25.7 mm length, 12.3 mm diameter were prepared for this test. All the specimens were dried in an oven at 80 C. for four hours and then moved into a desiccator until a constant weight was achieved, which was taken as an initial weight W_i. Then, each specimen was immersed in distilled water at either 25 C. or 50 C. for 24 hrs, i.e., the specimen was placed in a container of water, resting on an edge and entirely immersed. At the end of 24 hours, the sample was removed from the water, wiped free of surface moisture with a dry cloth, and weighed to the nearest 0.001 g immediately. The amount of water absorbed by the specimen was calculated using the following equation:
WR %=[(W_fW_i)/W_i]100
where WR % is the percentage of water retention by the specimen, and W_i and W_f are the weight of the specimen before and after immersion in distilled water, respectively. The average of three measurements is reported for each specimen.

(23) The compression test was done in accordance with ASTM D695-15. Compressive strength, modulus and elongation at break of each sample were measured via a universal testing machine (MTS model MH/20) with a load cell capacity of 100 kN. Three cylindrical specimens of 25.7 mm length and 12.3 mm diameter were prepared for each DW content level tested (0, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 wt %). Each specimen was compressed between the upper (movable) and lower (fixed) plates of the machine. Loading was increased until either fracture of the specimen occurred or a load value of 90% of the maximum load was reached. Otherwise, the test was interrupted manually when a specific contraction value was reached. All tests were conducted at room temperature and with an overhead speed of 1.3 mm/min. The average of three measurements is reported.

(24) The examination of pure PLA samples and composite material microstructure was carried out using a JEOL-JCM 5000 NeoScope Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). Samples were mounted on aluminum stubs and coated by gold to eliminate electrostatic charge during imaging and to achieve maximum magnification of textural and morphological characteristics. Images were taken at multiple resolutions.

(25) Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) was performed on the samples prepared as above and control samples of pure PLA prepared as above, but annealed for various times.

Example 2

Thermal Conductivity

(26) As shown in FIG. 1, the DW-PLA composite material, prepared as above, had low thermal conductivity (e.g., 0.0693 W/(m.Math.K) for 30 wt % DW:PLA composite at 298K) and relatively high mechanical properties. For reference, typical insulating materials used in building applications have a thermal conductivity k typically lower than 0.1 W/(m.Math.K). The present composite has the additional feature of being a biodegradable insulation material and a thermal conductivity lower than that many known insulation materials. Furthermore, regarding mechanical strength, the present composite has a significantly improved mechanical strength over typical insulation materials, rendering it particularly applicable to use in building construction.

(27) Two competing factors may affect the trend of thermal conductivity for the present DW-PLA composites with respect to DW content. These are the content of DW and the number of air voids in the composites. The k value of DW waste was measured to be (0.0626 W/(m.Math.K)), which is significantly lower than that of PLA alone. Therefore, increasing the concentration of DW in the DW-PLA composite leads to agglomeration of DW, which reduces air voids (see FIG. 2), which may be what leads to a slight increase in thermal conductivity at high DW content for the DW-PLA composites tested (see FIG. 1).

Example 3

Density

(28) FIG. 3 demonstrates the effect of DW content on the density of the DW-PLA composite. DW density was measured to be 518 kg/m.sup.3, while the PLA density was measured to be 1225 kg/m.sup.3. The DW-PLA composites showed a density range of 1220 kg/m.sup.3 to 1188 kg/m.sup.3 at 10 wt % and 50 wt % DW content, respectively. The mixing rule would have predicted densities of 1154 kg/m.sup.3 and 871 kg/m.sup.3, respectively, and is therefore not valid for the present composite.

Example 4

Water Retention

(29) FIG. 4 shows the water retention behavior of the DW-PLA composites after 24 hours immersion. In cold water (25 C.) tests, the water retention values for the 10 wt % DW, 20 wt % DW, 30 wt % DW, 40 wt % DW and 50 wt % DW composites were 0.0633%, 0.190%, 0.219%, 0.313% and 0.623%, respectively. The water retention among samples submerged in hot water (50 C.) was higher than for those submerged in cold water. FIG. 4 shows also that water retention increases with increasing DW content. Generally, the water retention behavior of the DW-PLA composite is very low, which is a big advantage over other thermal insulation materials, including some polyurethanes (after 24 h: 1%-6%), and materials reinforced with mineral wool and sisal (after 24 h: 10%-18%).

Example 5

Compression Testing

(30) FIG. 5 shows compression strength of the present composites as a function of filler content. The pure PLA sample strength was measured to be 96.35 MPa. Adding the DW to the PLA matrix produced samples with compression strength varying from 53 MPa to 80.0 MPa. The 50 wt % DW-PLA composite sample showed on average a compressive strength of 65.5 MPa. The achieved compression strengths were significantly higher than those of other typical insulation materials (2 MPa to 10 MPa) and comparable with typical building materials.

(31) FIG. 6 shows that the compression modulus initially decreases from that of pure PLA with the addition of DW, reaching a minimum of a 15% decrease at 20 wt % DW content. Adding further DW increases the compression modulus, reaching an 11% (2.82 GPa) increased modulus over pure PLA for the 50 wt % DW composite sample. These results indicate the composite becomes progressively less plastic and more resistant to deformation relative to pure PLA with increasing DW content. In general, the compression modulus for DW-PLA composites fell in the range between 2.87 GPa and 2.4 GPa, as shown in FIG. 6.

(32) In general, the nonlinear relations between DW content and the respective physical properties of the composites in FIGS. 1 and 3-6 make the presently disclosed composite particularly suitable to a variety of applications, depending on whether thermal conductivity or mechanical strength or plasticity is desired to be optimized. Based on the surprising trends depicted in the Figures and discussed above, one skilled in the art would understand that certain DW contents would be particularly and unexpectedly suitable for various optimizations.

Example 6

Crystallinity

(33) Annealing optimized crystal formation in light of mechanical properties for thermal insulation properties. For a thermal insulation material, minimal crystal formation should correspond to minimal thermal conductivity. At the same time, maximal mechanical strength is desired. Optimization was performed on pure PLA samples, as PLA is presumably responsible for crystallization. The following Table 1 shows how the degree of crystallinity (X.sub.c), thermal conductivity and compressive strength changes with annealing time at 95 C.

(34) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 PLA Annealing times vs. crystallinity, thermal conductivity and strength Annealing Process k Compressive strength Intervals (hrs) X.sub.c (%) (W/m.Math.K) (MPa) 0.0 (fast cooling) 33.8 0.064 58.9 1 51.3 0.080 90.2 3 54.1 0.086 99.0 17 64.8 0.089 101.2 24 68.4 0.091 108.4

(35) Based on the above results, a 3 hr annealing time provides optimal strength and thermal conductivity. High annealing time (e.g., 24 hrs) does not significantly increase mechanical strength, particularly relative to the amount of energy and time consumed. Low annealing time (fast cooling) produces very brittle material.

(36) DSC measurements in the following Table 2 shows how the degree of crystallinity (X_c) of DW-PLA composites decreases with DW content:

(37) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 DW-PLA composites annealed at 95 C. for 3 hrs DW Content (wt. %) X.sub.c (%) Pure PLA 54.1 10.0 58.7 20.0 48.1 30.0 46.3 40.0 33.2 50.0 32.7

(38) It is to be understood that the present subject matter is not limited to the embodiments described above, but encompasses any and all embodiments within the scope of the following claims.