Continuous inkjet printers

Abstract

The invention describes a method and apparatus for characterising EHT tripping events and thus discriminating between false trip events and those that warrant the printer being shut down.

Claims

1. A method of controlling a continuous inkjet printer having an electrostatic deflection facility operable to create an extra high tension (EHT) field to deflect charged ink droplets; a power unit operable to power said electrostatic facility; and a control unit operable to enable said power unit, said method comprising configuring said control unit to detect an electrostatic trip event and, in the event of a trip event being detected, to disable said power unit, said method being characterised by configuring said control unit to distinguish between a true trip event and a false trip event by comparing the time period of each trip event with a first predetermined time period and comparing the time period between successive trip events with a second predetermined time period, and identifying a true trip event where at least one of successive trip events has a time period greater than said first predetermined time period and the time between the successive trip events is less than said second predetermined time period.

2. A continuous inkjet printer having an electrostatic deflection facility operable to create an extra high tension (EHT) field to deflect charged ink droplets; a power unit operable to power said electrostatic facility; and a control unit operable to enable said power unit, said control unit being configured to detect an electrostatic trip event and, in the event of a trip event being detected, to disable said power unit, said printer being characterised in that said control unit is configured to distinguish between a true trip event and a false trip event by comparing the time period of each trip event with a first predetermined time period and comparing the time between successive trip events with a second predetermined time period, and identifying a true trip event where at least one of successive trip events has a time period greater than said first predetermined time period and the time between the successive trip events is less than said second predetermined time period.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) An embodiment of the invention will now be described with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1: shows examples of criteria used according to the invention to distinguish between false and true electrostatic trip events;

(3) FIG. 2: shows a system block diagram suitable for implementing the invention;

(4) FIG. 3: shows a control system block diagram which may be included in the system shown in FIG. 2; and

(5) FIG. 4: shows examples of true and false electrostatic pulses as determined according to the invention

DESCRIPTION OF WORKING EMBODIMENT

(6) This invention is concerned with EHT tripping or arcing in a CIJ printer. More particularly we have found that, by carefully characterising true or legitimate EHT trip events, we can use this as a basis for assessing all EHT discharge events, and thereby discriminate between true EHT trip events and false EHT trip events.

(7) In this context a true EHT trip event is one arising from a deterioration in operating conditions that, in turn, would inevitably lead to a deterioration in print quality. An example of this is a trip arising from build-up of ink residue on the deflector plates that, in turn, reduces the air gap between the plates. A false EHT trip event is a one-off event detected by the trip sensing system which, in general, is non-repeating and is therefore unlikely to result in a deterioration of print quality. One example of a false trip event is an event sensed by the EHT sensing system when an electrostatically charged operator discharges himself by touching a metallic part of the printer.

(8) We have found that a key characteristic of a falsely detected trip condition is a short duration voltage pulse observed at the EHT trip detector. The identification of this characteristic has been used to determine appropriate criteria for a true trip condition.

(9) Referring to FIG. 1, two criteria, X and Y, used to detect the validity of a trip condition are shown. The pulse of width X is of short duration which is typically indicative of a false trip event. Pulse Y, of longer duration, is typically indicative of a true trip event. It will be appreciated that X and Y (or at least a minimum value of Y or a maximum value of X) can be established in the printer control system whereupon comparisons can subsequently be made in real time, with the characterised values, to discriminate between false and true trip events.

(10) Additionally, as will be described below in relation to FIG. 4, the time period between trip events and/or the time period over which a number of qualifying signals need to be seen can be set in the control system so as to further aid the discrimination.

(11) Referring now to FIG. 2, part of a CIJ printer system includes an electrostatic deflection facility 10 in the form of positive plate 11 and negative plate 12. The deflection plates 11 and 12 are connected by wires to a high-voltage power supply unit 13. The power supply unit 13 is controlled by an electronic control unit 14 that, in normal operation, outputs an enable signal 15 causing an EHT deflection field to be generated between the plates 11 and 12. A pulse detection unit is provided, in this case in the form of a metal tube 20 through which passes the wire 21 connecting the power supply unit 13 to the positive plate 11. The tube 20 forms a capacitive sensor, such that voltage transients on the wire 21, representative of EHT trip signals, are coupled into the tube. The pulse detection unit may be of the form described in our European Patent Application No. 1 129 854. The tube 20 is electrically connected to conditioning electronics 23 in which the capacitively coupled signal from the tube 20 is subjected to threshold detection and voltage limitation so as to form a digital signal which is passed to, and processed by, electronic control unit 14.

(12) Referring to FIG. 3, the conditioned EHT trip signal passes through a pulse width detector 25, the output of which is fed to a pulse counter 26 and a pulse interval timer 27. The output signals, in turn, from counter 26 and timer 27 are fed into control logic 28 which is configured to determine if the number of pulses of the required widths have been detected to constitute a true EHT trip event. If the logic 28 determines that the detection criteria have been met, a signal is output causing power supply unit 13 to be switched off.

(13) By way of example only, a pulse interval for two qualifying pulses may be 50 ms, while a pulse-width for qualifying or true pulses may be a minimum of 800 ns. In addition to the pulse-width criterion for one of the pulses, it is normal to define a minimum pulse width for a second or indeed all subsequent pulses in order to reject glitches. An example of this period may be 50 ns but the point is made that the order of wide and narrow pulses can be either way around: narrow then wide or wide then narrow.

(14) The control logic may be effected using an FPGA device to perform the pulse width measurement and, for the pulse counting, a simple state machine may, for example, be used.

(15) Referring now to FIG. 4, a number of typical pulse detection criteria are shown. Whilst, for convenience of explanation, time intervals between pulses are shown, the logic may be configured to determine time intervals between the start of each pulse or the number of qualifying pulses (pulses of a particular length) in a given time interval.

(16) In FIG. 4a, pulses A and B, separated by time interval t.sub.1 are shown. Both A and B do not meet the minimum pulse width specified and, further, the time t.sub.1 is sufficiently long that even if either A or B qualified in terms of pulse width, the situation shown in FIG. 4(A) would still be regarded as a false trip and would not lead to a machine shut-down. Expressed in an alternative manner, the number of qualifying pulses are not present in a qualifying time period.

(17) In FIG. 4(B) pulses C and D are separated by time t.sub.2. Pulse C is of sufficient width to be a qualifying pulse but time interval t.sub.2 is of sufficient length to ensure that two qualifying pulses are not present with a qualifying time period. Thus the situation shown in FIG. 4(B) would also be regarded as a false trip.

(18) In FIG. 4(C) three pulses E, F and G are shown, E and F being separated by time interval t.sub.3 and F and G being separated by time interval t.sub.4. In this example pulses E and F do not meet the minimum width threshold and are thus non-qualifying. Pulse G meets the minimum width requirement and is thus a qualifying pulse. Because t3 is long the combination of E and F alone would not constitute a true trip event but combination of qualifying pulse G and t4 within the threshold time limit gives rise to a true trip event. By way of example, to constitute a true trip we need one pulse of >50 ns followed by one of >800 ns within the threshold time interval; or one >800 ns followed by one of >50 ns within the threshold time interval. Thus the scenario shown in FIG. 4c would cause a shut down of the power supply unit 13 and, ultimately, the printer.