SLIDING ELEMENT, IN PARTICULAR FOR A STRETCHING INSTALLATION AND/OR CONVEYOR CHAIN, AND ASSOCIATED STRETCHING INSTALLATION OR CONVEYOR CHAIN
20200132118 · 2020-04-30
Inventors
- Martin Swoboda (Freilassing, DE)
- Tobias HÄUSL (Traunstein, DE)
- Emmerich Kulinyak (Ruhpolding, DE)
- Sebastian Kraus (Siegsdorf, DE)
- Georg Murner (Bergen, DE)
- Markus Unterreiner (Marquartstein, DE)
- Werner Bamberger (Wolkersdorf, DE)
- Anthimos Giapoulis (Traunstein, DE)
- Michael Baumeister (Traunstein, DE)
Cpc classification
B29C55/08
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
Abstract
The invention relates to a sliding element, in particular for a stretching installation and/or a conveyor chain, comprising graphite or electrographite, wherein the sliding element has pores which have an open pore size of 7.5% by volume, and wherein the particle size of the graphite particles used as a starting material for the sliding elements is between 3 m and 15 m.
Claims
1. Sliding element, in particular for a stretching installation and/or conveyor chain, comprising graphite or electrographite, wherein the sliding element has pores, the open pore size being 7.5% by volume, and the particle size of the graphite particles used as a starting material for the sliding elements is between 3 m and 15 m.
2. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the open pore size is at least 8% by volume or preferably 9% by volume, 10% by volume, 11% by volume, 12% by volume, 13% by volume, 14% by volume or 15% by volume.
3. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the open pore size of the sliding element is 20% by volume, in particular 18% by volume, 16% by volume, 15% by volume, 14% by volume, 13% by volume, 12% by volume or in particular 11% by volume.
4. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element is impregnated with inorganic salts and/or inorganic salts are embedded in the sliding element.
5. Sliding elements according to claim 1, wherein the particle size of the graphite particles used as a starting material for the sliding elements is greater than or equal to 4 m, 5 m, 6 m, 7 m, 8 m, 9 m or 10 m, or is less than 14 m, 13 m, 12 m, 11 m, 10 m, 9 m, 8 m, 7 m, 6 m, or is less than 5 m.
6. Sliding elements according to claim 1, wherein the graphite particles used as a starting material for manufacturing the sliding elements are in a particle size distribution in which the median value d(50) for the particle size is between 14 m and 18 m, and the value for d(10) is between 2 m and 4 m and for d(90) is between 42 m and 50 m.
7. Sliding elements according to claim 1, wherein at least 60%, preferably more than 65%, 70%, 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, and in particular over 95% or preferably at least 96%, 97%, 98% and in particular 99% or 100% of the pores provided in the sliding element are soaked with oil.
8. Sliding element according to claim 4, wherein the inorganic salts are embedded at least in a surface layer of the sliding element and/or the sliding element is impregnated with inorganic salts in this region, the sliding element preferably being fully impregnated with the inorganic salts, preferably in a density distribution which is identical or deviates therefrom by less than 20% or in particular less than 10%.
9. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element is impregnated with inorganic salts or comprises embedded inorganic salts, which consist of or comprise phosphates or tertiary orthophosphates and preferably aluminium phosphate.
10. Sliding element according to claim 5, wherein the inorganic salts make up 1% by weight to 10% by weight, preferably more than 2% by weight, 3% by weight or 4% by weight and preferably less than 10% by weight, in particular less than 8% by weight, 7% by weight, 6% by weight or 5% by weight.
11. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the sliding element is formed as an isostatically pressed sliding element.
12. Sliding element according to claim 1, wherein the sliding surface of the sliding element has a maximum roughness at which height deviations are below 5 m, in particular below 4 m, 3 m or preferably below 2 m or 1 m.
13. Sliding element according to claim 12, wherein the sliding surface of the sliding element is polished.
14. Stretching installation or conveyor chain for a stretching installation, comprising sliding elements according to claim 1.
15. Stretching installation or conveyor chain for a stretching installation according to claim 14, wherein, as a counter partner for the conveyor chain, a carrier construction preferably in the form of a guide rail and/or carrier rail and/or control rail is provided, the thermal expansion coefficient of which corresponds to the thermal expansion coefficient of the sliding elements or deviates therefrom by less than 25%, in particular less than 20%, 15%, 10% or less than 5%.
16. Stretching installation or conveyor chain for a stretching installation according to claim 14, wherein the guide rail and/or carrier rail and/or control rail consists of a material having a degree of hardness which corresponds to the degree of hardness of the sliding elements or deviates therefrom by less than 25%, in particular less than 20%, 15%, 10% or less than 5%.
17. Stretching installation or conveyor chain for a stretching installation according to claim 14, wherein the guide and/or carrier and/or control rail is heated above a temperature limit value to reduce the coefficient of friction.
Description
[0047] Hereinafter, the invention will be described in greater detail with reference to embodiments. In the drawings, in detail:
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
BASIC CONSTRUCTION OF A TRANSVERSE STRETCHING INSTALLATION
[0058] In a known manner, the film lateral or transverse stretching installation described below, also denoted hereinafter as a TD stretching installation for short (TD=transverse direction), has two symmetrically formed drive systems.
[0059] The stretching installation shown in
[0060] A monoaxial or uniaxial film F (if a longitudinal stretching installation is upstream from the transverse stretching installation shown) or an unstretched film F (film being referred to in the following, even though a treatment web F in general can be treated and transversely stretched accordingly using a stretching installation of this type, meaning that the invention is not limited to a plastics material film web in this regard) passes into the stretching installation in the entry region E, where it is gripped and clamped by pegs, which are explained further hereinafter, such as are shown for example in
[0061] In the following, a peg conveyor unit KT is also discussed, sometimes also denoted hereinafter as a peg chain unit KK (
[0062] As is known and as is shown in cross section in
[0063] The described carrier structure may be used as a shared carrier structure for the conveyor system both on the stretching or process side RS and on the return side RL (
[0064]
[0065] As stated, the conveyor chain 13 is driven and deflected on both the exit and the entry side by exit and/or entry wheels AR and ER.
[0066] In this context,
[0067] In this context,
[0068] In this context, the sliding block 21 may itself consist of or predominantly comprise a fibre-reinforced thermoplastics plastics material, preferably in the form of PEEK (polyether ether ketone), in which, in interaction with the two opposite, lateral and generally vertical guide faces of the guide rail 15, corresponding sliding elements or sliding plates 24 are used, which are configured according to the invention, as well as the sliding base element or plate 25 shown in
[0069] The overall arrangement is for example such that a U-shaped recess 26 is provided between the peg part 6 (in other words the actual peg portion) and the chain part 7 (in other words the actual chain portion) so as to form a lower bridge part B (via which the peg part is connected to the chain part), a corresponding guide rail sliding bearing 21 being inserted, sometimes also denoted hereinafter as a sliding block 21.
[0070] This guide rail sliding bearing 21 thus comprises a sliding body or sliding block 21 of U-shaped cross section having an appropriate width or length in the direction of the guide rail 15 for absorbing the corresponding guide forces here. It should be emphasised that the sliding elements may be of any desired shape and are not limited to the aforementioned U shape.
[0071] In a deviation from
[0072] Otherwise, a complete sliding block 21 having associated sliding elements 24 inserted (preferably detachably inserted) into it can be inserted into the U-shaped recess to form the peg body, for example including by means of projections 33, which may be slid into corresponding recesses 35 in the peg body (
[0073] Using the transverse stretching installation shown in a schematic plan view in
[0074] In the tests performed, different sliding elements were used, starting with sliding elements as known in the prior art. In particular sliding elements were used which were attached to the individual pegs of the conveyor chain and interacted with the sliding face of the guide rails and/or carrier rails and which, in accordance with the prior art, consisted of fibre-reinforced PEEK material. Corresponding measurements were then taken for sliding elements according to the invention, which are abbreviated as B21 for short hereinafter. Thus, actual oil consumption values could be measured under actual production conditions of a stretching installation. In this context, as indirect variables, the torques of the drive motors at the entrance and exit of the stretching installation were the criteria. Using these variables, the coefficients of friction of the corresponding sliding pairs can be determined indirectly.
[0075] In accordance with
[0079] In
[0080] In the described test setup according to
[0081] In this connection, the following table specifies for these four lubricant supply units an example of the corresponding daily lubricant amounts, a particular speed factor (1.2) and a particular thickness factor (1.0) being applied. The penultimate column gives the theoretically determined value of 0.483 l per day.
[0082] The last column gives actually measured lubricant averages at the four lubricant unit supply points, in other words the actual oil consumption, the last row specifying the total daily lubricant amount.
TABLE-US-00001 Lubri- Consumption Actual cation Consumption Speed Thickness specification consumption site [l/day] factor factor [l/day] [l/day] Inlet 0.42 1.2 1.0 0.483 0.464 Middle 0.42 1.2 1.0 0.483 0.435 drive side Middle 0.42 1.2 1.0 0.483 0.493 operator side Outlet 0.42 1.2 1.0 0.483 0.341
Sliding Elements or Sliding Bodies According to the Invention
[0083] The prior art has already proposed sliding bodies or sliding elements which consist of graphite or comprise a significant proportion of graphite. As was described previously, it was proposed in the prior art to use graphite sliding elements which have been impregnated using polymers.
[0084] In the context of the invention, however, it has now been found that the use of polymers of this type merely means that if the graphite sliding bodies have pores these pores are filled in. This then has the result that no lubricant, such as oil, can penetrate into these pores, ultimately actually reducing the sliding capacity.
[0085] It has therefore been found in the context of the invention that sliding bodies made of graphite and in particular electrographite which have a minimum pore size should be used.
[0086] This minimum pore size should be approximately 8% or more than 8%. Good values can be achieved if the pore size is at least 9% or 10% and more. Values below 25% are entirely sufficient and satisfactory in this context.
[0087] As a result of this pore size, lubricant such as oil can then penetrate into these pores, causing the long-term sliding capacity of a graphite sliding element of this type to be greatly improved by comparison with conventional solutions. Ultimately, as a result of the capillary forces, the lubricant can penetrate into these pore openings and thus contributes to reducing the overall lubricant requirement. In the tests, it was found to be particularly advantageous if the pores of the sliding elements are soaked with oil as completely as possible, for example by storing them in an oil bath for several hours before they are installed in the bearing elements. This primary saturation greatly reduces wear.
[0088] The effects can be further improved by using a graphite sliding body which is impregnated with a minimum proportion of inorganic salts and in particular metal salts. Especially impregnation with metal salts in the form of phosphates (for example tertiary orthophosphates) leads to particularly good results. In particular, aluminium phosphate (AlPO.sub.4) may also be mentioned here. A further improvement can be achieved by additionally subjecting the graphite powder used to isostatic pressing during the manufacturing process of the sliding elements. Finally, it should be noted that, during the impregnation with metal salts, metal salt compounds such as in particular metal phosphates should be used which have a particle size in the range of 3 m and more and preferably less than 150 m.
[0089] In conclusion, it can thus be established that the sliding bodies according to the invention are distinguished by one or other of the following features, especially in combination: [0090] The sliding elements are provided with an impregnation, preferably in the form of inorganic salts, in particular phosphates (salts and esters of orthophosphoric acid). [0091] The sliding elements are impregnated with metal salts, in particular in the form of aluminium phosphate (AlPO.sub.4). [0092] The inorganic salts, in particular in the form of phosphates and particularly preferably in the form of aluminium phosphate, are embedded in the sliding element or sliding body in a proportion of 1% by weight to 20% by weight. [0093] The phosphates and in particular metal phosphates should preferably have particle sizes in the region of d50=30 m, d90=100 m and d50=5 m, d90=15 m and particularly preferably of d50=7 m, d50=30 m. [0094] The sliding elements are fully impregnated not only in a surface region or a surface layer up to 1 mm or 2 mm, but preferably completely. [0095] The starting materials required for manufacturing the sliding elements are baked together using a suitable method, for example by isostatic pressing, ultimately causing the sliding elements to be produced. [0096] The particle sizes and the particle distribution of the graphite powder used as a starting material for manufacturing the sliding elements should also be in particular ranges. The maximum particle size distribution (average particle size, expected value) of the graphite powder used as a starting material, but also of the sliding element manufactured by pressing, is between 3 and 15 m, depending on the desired mechanical values, for example the bending strength. Preferably, average particle sizes between 7 and 10 m have been found to be suitable. Sizes between 14 and 18 m as a median d(50), between 2 and 4 m as a d(10) and between 42 and 50 m as a d(90) have been measured. (The values d.sub.10, d.sub.50 and d.sub.90 are used to characterise a particle size distribution. The d.sub.50 value is defined as the average particle size distribution [DIN 13320]. The values d.sub.10 and d.sub.90 are used to describe the width of a particle size distribution d.sub.width=d.sub.90d.sub.10). [0097] The open pore sizes and/or pore distribution of the sliding elements is at least 8 by volume or preferably 9% by volume, 10% by volume, 11% by volume, 12% by volume, 13% by volume, 14% by volume or 15% by volume. In this context, the corresponding values for the open pore size of the sliding element should further be 20% by volume, in particular 18% by volume, 16% by volume, 15% by volume, 14% by volume, 13% by volume, 12% by volume or in particular 11% by volume. [0098] The sliding elements have for example oil-saturated pores or in general fluid-filled pores, specifically under conventional operating conditions, for example at an air humidity of 5 (preferably 8-20) [g/m.sup.3].
[0099] In this context, it is further noted that as a fundamental principle the particle measurement has a distribution curve, for example ideally a normal distribution.
Tests
[0100] A series of tests were performed on stretching installations, specifically both using fibre-reinforced sliding elements such as are known in the prior art and using graphite sliding elements which already have one or more of the preferred features according to the invention.
[0101] For this purpose, reference is made to the table of properties appended to the end of the description, from which various values relating to conventional fibre-reinforced graphite sliding elements and to a graphite sliding element according to the invention can be derived.
[0102] In the aforementioned table of properties appended to the end of the description, values for graphite sliding bodies can be derived from columns a, b, c, d, e, f, P, SFU and SR, these being graphite sliding bodies which are known from the prior art.
[0103] The final column reproduces the data relating to a graphite body according to the invention, under the designation B21.
[0104] Using fibre-reinforced sliding elements and graphite sliding bodies of this type, test series were performed, the table reproduced below establishing what lubricant amounts are required when a conventional fibre-reinforced PEEK sliding body is used in a stretching installation and by contrast when a graphite body is used which already has one, two or three preferred features. In this context, a chain system C was used in which it was possible to move a plastics material film web to be stretched through the stretching installation at a maximum advance speed (limit speed) of 525 m/min. The sliding bodies used were distinguished as follows: [0105] C1: The sliding body C1 consists of a conventional fibre-reinforced sliding body (PEEK) which has been impregnated as described in the prior art with a polymer mass. [0106] C2: A corresponding test series was performed using a graphite sliding body C2 modified from the prior art, which by way of example had an open pore size of 10%. [0107] C3: In this test, by comparison with the test setup using the sliding body C2, the sliding body C3 had further additionally been fully impregnated with aluminium phosphate. [0108] C4: This sliding body C4 is a graphite sliding body which has a pore size of 10%, has additionally been impregnated with aluminium phosphate, and has further been subjected to isostatic pressing.
[0109] Test series were performed in which corresponding conveyor chains comprising the sliding bodies were used for up to 1000 operating hours and well over 1000 operating hours.
[0110] In this context, the individual rows of the table below specify a base factor Bf for the sliding bodies C1, C2, C3 and C4, which represents the amount of lubricant [in litres] per minute and per day when the advance speed of the plastics material film is less than 525 m/min and the film thickness is 20 m, for the sliding bodies C1, C2, C3 and C4.
TABLE-US-00002 Operating C1 C2 C3 C4 Chain system hours [10.sup.3] [10.sup.3] [10.sup.3] [10.sup.3] Basic factor of the 1000 h 28 14 7 5.04 sliding face [l/m/24 h] >1000 h 12 6 4 2.52 (v 300 m/min, film thickness 20 m) Limit speed [m/min] 525
[0111] The following table summarises the oil consumptions, which are dependent on the speed and the film load:
TABLE-US-00003 B21 B21 B21 Chain system C of length Prior art sliding sliding sliding 350 [m], end speed 525 sliding system system system [m/min] and 30 [m] system test rig test rig test rig film thickness C1 tests C2 C3 C4 Chain length 350 [m] 4.90 2.45 1.67 0.88 Bf = 0.014 100% for >1000 h Factor of increase 1.441 due to speed 7.06 3.53 2.40 1.27 Factor of increase 1.15 due to film thickness 5.64 2.82 1.92 1.01 Overall, only 11.96 5.98 4.07 2.15 dependent on speed Overall, with film load 17.60 8.80 5.98 3.17
[0112] In this context, at a limit speed of 525 m/min and a chain length of 350 [m], the consumption values reproduced in the final row occurred.
[0113] For a better understanding, in this connection an example calculation for the chain system C1 comprising a standard PEEK sliding system having a chain length of KL=350 m will be given. Use for more than 1000 operating hours results in a base consumption of
Consumption=KL*Bf=14*350 m*10.sup.3=4.9
[0114] For a chain sliding system which is preferred according to the invention, in accordance with example C4, this results in a greatly reduced oil amount of only 0.9 [l/24 h].
Preferred Values for a Graphite Sliding Body According to the Invention
[0115] The invention table appended at the end of the description specifies preferred values for the graphite body according to the invention.
[0116] In this context, for achieving the benefit according to the invention, it is of decisive importance that the graphite body according to the invention has the at least preferably specified pore size.
[0117] The lubricant reduction can be further improved if the graphite body according to the invention is further impregnated with an inorganic salt, in particular a metal salt, preferably with a metal phosphate, in particular using aluminium phosphate. A further improvement occurs, as an alternative to the aforementioned point and preferably in addition, if the graphite body has preferably additionally been subjected to isostatic pressing.
[0118] In principle, it is sufficient if the impregnation with the inorganic salt is carried out or provided in a sufficient surface layer having a sufficient layer on the sliding body or sliding element. Preferably, however, a sliding element is used which is fully impregnated with the inorganic salt.
Preferred Sliding Pairs
[0119] Aside from the sliding elements explained above which have the advantages according to the invention, favourable reduced coefficients of friction and thus a reduced lubricant requirement occur, in particular in conveyor chains such as are also used in stretching installations, if the corresponding carrier elements cooperating with the sliding elements also have specific properties.
[0120] In particular in the case of a stretching installation, the carrier elements which cooperate with the conveyor chain and/or the pegs are guide rails, carrier rails and/or if applicable control rails. In this context, the sliding elements according to the invention are preferably provided on the conveyor chain or the pegs, specifically at the points which cooperate with the corresponding sliding faces on the guide rail and/or the conveyor rail (or if applicable the control rail). Good physical compatibility occurs as a result of a pairing of materials having identical or similar thermal expansion coefficients. Through targeted selection of the formulation constituents, the expansion coefficient both of the sliding elements and of the rails which interact therewith can be adjusted.
[0121] The sliding elements according to the invention thus have advantages especially when they are used in stretching installations. This has never been subject to separate examination in the prior art thus far.
[0122] Good physical compatibility then occurs as a result of pairing materials having identical or similar thermal expansion coefficients. Good counter partners for the conveyor chains/conveyor pegs provided with the sliding elements according to the invention are, for example, rails formed from hard materials, such as grey iron, hard metal, aluminium oxide, silicon carbide, glass, materials coated with DLC, and in particular hard-alloy steels. These are thus materials such as are used in any case in particular for rails, in other words guide rails and carrier rails, in stretching systems.
[0123] Purely by way of example, the properties of a counter partner of this type, in the form of a guide rail as used in the performed tests, will be reproduced:
Material 1.7225=42CrMo4V (quenched and tempered steel)
Surface roughness: Rz5 (polished)
Hardness: Surface >600-650 HV 0.5
[0124] at depth 0.2>400 HV 0.5 [0125] core hardness 0.3>300+50 HV 0.5
Thermal expansion coefficient
at 20 C.-200 C.: 12.1106 K1
Change in the Required Lubricant Amount as a Function of Further Factors
[0126] In principle, further factors may be noted which lead to a change in the lubricant amount.
[0127] Although the changes discussed hereinafter in the lubricant amount also occur in conventional graphite bodies, the corresponding effects are sometimes particularly surprising when a graphite body according to the invention is used. In this context, if the graphite body according to the invention or the preferably appropriately developed graphite body according to the invention is used, it is ensured in all cases that the necessary lubricant amount is much lower than in comparable prior art solutions, in particular if PEEK sliding bodies are used.
[0128] In this context, it is assumed that these sliding bodies, as in the prior art, are also preferably used in contact with guide rails/carrier rails (and/or control rails), in particular in stretching installations of which the rails consist of or comprise steel as the basic substance.
Speed-Dependent Factor
[0129] Above a limit speed, there is a linearly increasing speed-dependent additional oil consumption in addition to the base value reproduced in the table above.
[0130] In tests, the following relationship was demonstrated:
F.sub.v=(.sub.vE.sub.vG)[m/min]*0.3[% min/m]+1
Here, F.sub.v is the factor for the additional oil consumption at an end speed .sub.vE on the basis of a film thickness of 20 m. In this context, the limit speed .sub.vG is dependent on the chain system in question. For the chain system C presently under consideration, .sub.vG is 300 [m/min]. Up to .sub.vG, a constant oil consumption value is set.
Load-Dependent Factor
[0131] For film thicknesses greater than 20 m the oil consumption increases as a result of the additional forces due to the greater film thickness, in accordance with the relationship:
F.sub.D=(th20) [m]*1.5[%/m]+1
[0132] Here, F.sub.D is the factor for the film thickness th.
[0133] The corresponding relationships can be seen from
[0134] Using these above-mentioned supplementary values thus gives the daily oil or lubricant consumption in a corresponding stretching installation using a conveyor chain which moves along together with the described sliding bodies on a guide rail, as can be seen in
[0135] In this context,
[0136] It can also be seen from this that the sliding bodies according to the invention lead to a drastic reduction in the lubricant requirement, specifically in the cases [0137] where only the pore size has the desired minimum dimension (of more than 8% and preferably less than 20%), [0138] where additionally, in the case of a sliding stone C3, the graphite body has additionally further been impregnated with a metal salt, preferably in the form of a metal phosphate, in other words using aluminium phosphate in the embodiment shown, and [0139] where a sliding body accordingly prepared in this manner has additionally further been subjected to isostatic pressing.
[0140]
Decreasing Lubricant Consumption with Higher Temperature of the Sliding Pair (Guide Rail/Sliding Element)
[0141] Finally, it should further be noted that, both when prior art graphite sliding bodies are used and when graphite sliding bodies according to the invention are used, the coefficient of friction decreases with an increasingly high temperature of the sliding pair (guide rail/sliding element).
[0142] This is shown in
[0143] Therefore, the lubricant requirement can also be reduced further if the sliding pair F has been brought to an appropriate higher temperature level.
[0144] The coefficients of friction in
Decreasing Friction and Resulting Reduction in the Lubricant Requirement as a Result of Appropriately Broken-in Graphite Elements with a Polished Graphite Sliding Body Surface
[0145] A comparison of used and already inserted graphite sliding elements shows significant differences in topography. New graphite sliding elements generally have height profile differences of up to approximately 5 m per face element, while in used graphite sliding elements these height profile differences often only remain as a height difference of approximately 1 m.
[0146] The height structure is thus homogenised in broken-in sliding elements, peaks on the graphite body sliding face having been polished away. This homogenisation of the topography also contributes to broken-in sliding elements having a lower oil consumption and explains why this is the case.
Sliding Elements According to the Invention
[0147] The table of properties reproduced on the page below has already been mentioned.
[0148] It establishes values for sliding elements having corresponding different test setups.
[0149] The sliding elements a, b, c, d, e, f, P, SFU, SR and B21 along with the respectively stated properties were determined in identical tests and test setups. The sliding elements a-f, P, SFU and SR are known from the prior art. The sliding element given in the penultimate column and labelled with the name B21 relates to an optimised sliding element according to the invention.
[0150] The corresponding values for the density, hardness, bending strength, compressive strength, modulus of elasticity, the relevant values for the thermal expansion, for the thermal conductivity etc. can be seen from this table of properties for the prior art sliding elements as well as for the sliding element B21 according to the invention.
[0151] The final column E specifies that preferred values for the sliding element according to the invention may be for example up to 75% less than the value specified in the penultimate column for the sliding element B21 up to 25% above these values.
[0152] Thus, the final column E states the preferred range specifications which represent the preferred properties for the sliding element according to the invention.
[0153] This is intended to express that for example the porosity, which for the sliding element B21 according to the invention is specified as 10% by volume, can fluctuate from 7.5% by volume to 12.5% by volume.
[0154] In this context, the deviations may be between any sub-ranges of this range specification.
[0155] In other words, for example, for the specification25%, each value may deviate from the optimum value by preferably less than 25%, 24%, 23%, 22%, . . . , 5%, 4%, 3%, 2% or by less than 1%.
[0156] Likewise, for example, for the specification+25%, the values should preferably not be greater than +25%, in particular not greater than +24%, +23%, +22%, . . . , +5%, +4%, +3%, +2% or not greater than +1% with respect to the value specified in the penultimate column in each case.
[0157] In this context, the aforementioned deviations are of significance especially as regards the porosity. The other values could also potentially be over the below or above the specified range limits.
TABLE-US-00004 Property table (compariston of properties of some graphites which were tested as sliding elements) Property Units Standard a b c d e f P SFU SR B21 E Density g/cm.sup.3 DIN IEC 1.70 1.75 1.70 1.68 1.73 2.55 1.78 2.02 1.88 1.85 25% 60413/203 Hardness Rockwell DIN IEC 105 105 105 95 105 115 86 115 110 90 25% HR.sub.5/100 B 60413/303 Bending MPa DIN IEC 55.2 40 60 35 75.8 79.3 112 105 85 58.6 25% strength 60413/501 Compression MPa DIN 51910 155 100 180 10 120 290 175 215 170 148 25% strength Modulus of GPa DIN 51915 22 16 18 8.96 22 20.7 14.5 12 13.5 13.8 25% elasticity Thermal 10.sup.4K.sup.1 DIN 51909 3.06 6.5 4.14 3.78 11.0.sup.1) 5.94 8.1 7.8 4.7 3.96 25% expansion (20-200 C.) [m/m C.] Thermal Wm.sup.3K.sup.1 DIN 51908 12 11 14 25 6 32.9 70 82 100 79.5 25% conductivity Thermal C. 350 350 350 500 180 600 25% resistance in oxidising atmosphere Porosity Vol. % 11 8 14 0 <2.5 20 8 10 10 25% (open) Elec. m 19.5 10 13 25% resisticity Average m 1 <5 3 25% particle 100% size .sup.1)from 20-150 C. |