TRIAL NECK
20200121476 ยท 2020-04-23
Inventors
Cpc classification
A61F2002/3631
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2/3609
HUMAN NECESSITIES
A61F2002/30617
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
Abstract
A bent trial femoral neck (400) and method for visually assessing the orientation of an acetabular cup implanted in a pelvis of a patient are described. The bent trial femoral neck comprises a body (402) extending along a femoral neck axis, an attachment formation (408, 410) extending from the body for releasably attaching the trial femoral neck to a femoral part received with a femur of the patient and a taper (404). The taper extends along a taper axis and the taper axis is tilted anteriorly relative to the femoral neck axis by an angle configured to position a trial femoral head having an indicium on an outer surface so that the indicium is parallel to a plane of a rim of the acetabular cup, or a rim of a liner within the acetabular cup, when the acetabular cup is oriented in the pelvis of the patient with a target orientation and the hip joint is in a predetermined position.
Claims
1. A bent trial femoral neck for visually assessing the orientation of an acetabular cup implanted in a pelvis of a patient, the bent trial femoral neck comprising: a body extending along a femoral neck axis; an attachment formation extending from the body for releasably attaching the trial femoral neck to a femoral part received with a femur of the patient; and a taper, wherein the taper extends along a taper axis and wherein the taper axis is tilted anteriorly relative to the femoral neck axis by an angle configured to position a trial femoral head having an indicium on an outer surface so that the indicium is parallel to a plane of a rim of the acetabular cup, or a rim of a liner within the acetabular cup, when the acetabular cup is oriented in the pelvis of the patient with a target orientation and the hip joint is in a predetermined position.
2. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 1, wherein the taper axis is tilted relative to the femoral neck axis by an angle in the range of 10 to 40.
3. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 2, wherein the taper axis is tilted relative to the femoral neck axis by an angle of 35.
4. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 1, wherein the body comprises a lower and an upper portion and wherein a recess is located on a side of the bent trial femoral neck between the upper portion and the lower portion and arranged to accommodate a portion of the trial femoral head when attached to the taper.
5. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 4, wherein the lower portion and the upper portion are connected by a rib located on a side of the bent trial femoral neck opposite to the recess.
6. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 1, wherein the target orientation is a target anteversion of the acetabular cup.
7. The bent trial femoral neck of claim 6, wherein the target anteversion of the acetabular cup is 20 relative to the pelvis of the patient.
8. The orientation guide of claim 1, wherein the hip joint is in an anatomical position corresponding to the femur of the patient being placed in 0 of flexion/extension, 0 of adduction/abduction and 0 of internal/external rotation.
9. A kit of parts comprising: the bent trial femoral neck of claim 1; and a trial femoral head, wherein the trial femoral head includes a cavity configured to receive the taper therein and wherein the cavity extends along a trial head axis and wherein the indicium is arranged to identify a plane perpendicular to the trial head axis.
10. The kit of parts of claim 9, wherein the indicium is an equatorial indicium.
11. The kit of parts of claim 9, further comprising: a femoral cutting instrument including a further attachment formation and wherein the trial femoral neck is releasably attachable to the femoral cutting instrument using the attachment formation and the further attachment formation.
12. The kit of parts of claim 11, wherein the femoral cutting instrument is a femoral broach.
13. An assembly of the kit of parts of claim 9, wherein the trial femoral head is mounted on the taper of the bent trial femoral neck.
14. The assembly of claim 13, wherein the trial femoral neck is attached to the femoral broach.
15-20. (canceled)
Description
[0035] An embodiment of the invention will now be described in detail, by way of example only, and with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054] Similar items in different Figure shared common reference signs unless indicated otherwise.
[0055] Before describing the apparatus and/or methods of the invention, the geometry of a hip joint will be discussed generally. In the below, a right hip joint is described, but it will be appreciated that a similar discussion applies to a left hip joint. Also, the following discussion is intended to relate to both the pre-operative natural, or native, hip joint, as well as to the artificial, or prosthetic, hip joint. Hence, although the magnitude of the various angles may vary between the native hip joint and the prosthetic hip joint, the definitions of those angles may be generally the same for the native and prosthetic hip and may be determined by the positions and/or orientations of the various parts making up the native hip joint and prosthetic hip joint respectively.
[0056] With reference to
[0057] With particular reference to
[0058] With reference to
[0059]
[0060] Hence during hip surgery in which a prosthetic femoral component is used, one of the variables is the femoral neck anteversion angle 124, which generally measures how far forward the femoral neck 126 is directed compared to the medial-lateral axis of the femur.
[0061] With reference to
[0062] As illustrated in
[0063] The pelvis 200 includes a transverse axis 206 passing between the right ASIS 208 and the left ASIS 210. An anterior pelvic plane 212 (generally referred to as APP in the following) is defined by the transverse axis 206 and first and second points on the symphysis pubis 214, 216.
[0064] As best illustrated in
[0065] Hence, as illustrated in the perspective view of the pelvis 200 in
[0066] With reference to
[0067] As illustrated in
[0068] Hence, as can be seen the overall geometry of the hip joint arises from the orientation of the acetabulum relative to the pelvis and also the orientation of the femoral neck relative to the femur. In the illustrated example, the overall or combined anteversion of the hip joint 200 shown in
[0069] However, in practice, when surgeons talk about a combined anteversion of about 35, this may be arrived at by adding absolute values of angles in different planes, 15 anteversion of the neck relative to the femur in a first plane and 20 anteversion of the acetabulum relative to the pelvis in a second, different plane, to give approximately 35. In practice, the combined anteversion is assumed to be in the range of approximately 30 to 40, as being typically greater than 30 and less than 40, and that any measurement or assessment is likely to be accurate to plus or minus a few degrees anyway and so measurement of the angles in different, non-parallel planes is not crucial.
[0070] Herein, combined anteversion may refer, depending on the context, to the general idea that the anteversion of a hip joint is the combined effect of the degree of anteversion of the femoral neck relative to the femur and also the degree of anteversion of the acetabulum relative to the pelvis. More specifically, for non-extreme cases, combined anteversion may also refer to a general rule of thumb that the sum of the acetabular anteversion and the femoral anteversion, measured in the same plane, should have a certain value, for example approximately 35. Hence, if a low value of one occurs, then the other can be increased (or vice versa) in order to bring the combined anteversion closer to this target value.
[0071] With reference to
[0072]
[0073] The trial femoral neck 400 comprises a body 402 and a taper 404 at a free end of the trial femoral neck and which is tilted or inclined relative to the body 402. The taper 404 is retroverted relative to the remainder of the trial femoral neck. The body has an underside 406 from which a first attachment formation 408, in the form of a circular peg, extends. Ad best illustrated in the cross sectional view of
[0074] The first 408 and second attachment formations 410 are arranged to co-operate with counterpart respective female and male attachment formations provided in a superior portion of a femoral part, such as a femoral broach or rasp, to allow the trial femoral neck 400 to be releasably attached to the formal part in use, as described in greater detail below.
[0075] The trial femoral neck 400 may be made from any suitable biocompatible material such as a metal, alloy or plastic. In particular, the trial femoral neck 400 may be made from stainless steel. Alternatively, the trial femoral neck may be made from a plastic, for example a glass-filled PAEK/PEEK or a PAEK/PEEK Blend such as Solvay Avaspire.
[0076] Other suitable materials include titanium, aluminium, cobalt chrome, polyphenylsulphone, polyacetal, polyamide, polypropylene, polyarylamide, polyetherimide, acrylonitrile-butadiene-styrene, polymethylmethacrylate, polycarbonate, and all polymers could be unfilled state or filled with glass or carbon fibres or beads.
[0077]
[0078] As best illustrated in
[0079] Although an equatorial indicium is used in the described embodiment, in other embodiments, the indicium may be at other positions along the trial femoral head axis. All that is required is that the indicium generally indicates a plane which is generally perpendicular to the trial femoral head axis. Hence in other embodiments, the indicium may be other lines of constant latitude, which are parallel to the actual equator of the trial femoral head.
[0080] Also, although a groove is used as the indicium, other embodiments, the indicium may be provided by other features, such as rib, a line or band on the surface, whether continuous or broken, and similar.
[0081] As best illustrated in
[0082] As illustrated in
[0083] The taper 404 is configured such that when the trial head 450 is fully seated on the taper, then the centre of the trial head 450, corresponds to the same position, that the trial head 450 would have if used with a conventional trial neck of the same length. Hence, the position of the centre of rotation provided by the trial head 450 when mounted on the trial neck 402 is the same, but the orientation of the trial head is tilted by an angle of approximately 35 relative to broach or neck of the stem. Hence, the equatorial indicium is also tilted away from the horizontal in
[0084] Specifically, the angle of inclination 472 corresponds to a target cup anteversion of approximately 20 relative to the patient's pelvis when the assembly 440 is approximately 15 anteverted relative to the patient's femur and the trial hip joint is placed in an anatomical position or configuration. The anatomical position of the hip joint corresponds to the patient's femur being placed in 0 of flexion/extension, 0 of adduction/abduction and 0 of internal/external rotation. Hence, the combined anteversion of the hip joint would be approximately 35, if the rim of the cup or liner is generally parallel to the equatorial indicium 452. The plane of the rim of the cup or liner will be parallel to the plane of the equatorial indicium 452 if the cup has also been placed with an inclination of approximately 40 relative to the pelvis.
[0085]
[0086] Similarly to the first embodiment as illustrated in
[0087] The trial femoral neck 500 is closer to a representation of a normal neck and therefore represents more accurately the external envelope of a real implant neck. Hence, during a range of motion (ROM) assessment, the outcomes and assessment would be more representative of a real implant, for example, the neck would clash with the cup at approximately the same angles.
[0088] The first embodiment of the trial femoral neck allows greater compatibility but has material absent on one side and added on the other side and so may not as accurately reproduce a ROM assessment for a prosthetic neck.
[0089] The trial femoral neck 500 may be made from any suitable biocompatible material such as a metal, alloy or plastic as described above in relation to the first embodiment.
[0090] With reference to
[0091] At 602, the femur is prepared in a generally conventional manner which may include resecting the native femoral neck and head and then at 604 a cavity is formed along the intramedullary canal to accept a femoral stem component and which typically includes using one or more broaches and/or rasps. When a final sized broach has been used, then a broach handle is removed and the broach is left in the femur. At 606, the acetabulum is prepared in a generally conventional manner which may include removing soft tissue and forming a hemispherical cavity within the native acetabulum using an acetabular reamer. At 608 a prosthetic acetabular cup is inserted in the acetabular cavity by the surgeon using a cup inserter and with a certain orientation (version and abduction). Any cup liner may also be inserted in the implanted acetabular cup at 608.
[0092] At 610, the bent trial femoral neck 400, 500 is attached to the broach in the femur and the trial femoral head 450 is attached to the taper 402, 502 of the trial neck 400, 500 to form a trial femoral assembly. At 612, the trial joint is reduced by introducing the trial femoral head 450 into the implanted acetabular cup, or liner. Then at 614, the patient's pelvis and/or leg are manipulated to place the trial joint in the preselected position or configuration.
[0093] In particular, the patient's leg is placed with the femur in an anatomical position with respect to the pelvis. Specifically, the femur is placed in 0 of flexion/extension, 0 of adduction/abduction and 0 of internal/external rotation.
[0094] Assuming that the pelvis on the operating table has taken up an approximately neutral amount of pelvic tilt then this can be achieved by comparing the following three factors. The long axis of the leg relative to the longitudinal axis of the patient can be adjusted by pulling lightly on the lower limb to pull the leg into full extension. If an anterior approach is being used, with the patient supine, then the leg will naturally rest in full extension. Zero abduction/adduction of the legs can be achieved by placing both lower legs (tibia from knee to ankle) parallel and almost touching. An internal/external rotation angle of 0 can be checked using the epicondyle axis of the knee relative to the transverse axis of the pelvis. If the pelvis is level (supine) or vertical (in a lateral decubitus approach) on the table, then the epicondyle axis can be compared to the table. If a posterior approach is being used, with the patient lateral, then the tibia can be flexed 90 to provide a more discernible indication on the femoral articular axis which will indicate any internal/external rotation of the femur. Hence, depending on the orientation of the patient on the table, the patient's legs are placed in appropriate positions to provide 0 of flexion/extension, 0 of abduction/adduction and 0 of internal/external rotation of the femur with respect to the pelvis. With the patient's legs in this anatomical position, an assessment of the cup orientation can be carried out at step 616.
[0095] If the cup has been placed with an orientation having an anteversion relative to the pelvis corresponding to the value to which the bent trial femoral neck has been configured, e.g. 20, then the equatorial indicium 452 will be generally parallel to the rim of the cup, or liner. Alternatively, if the cup has been placed with an orientation having an anteversion different to the target value, then the equatorial indicium 452 will be not be parallel to the rim of the cup or liner. Hence, the equatorial indicium 452 provides a visual indication of the anteversion angle of the acetabular cup, as the angle subtended between the line of the equatorial indicium 452 and plane of the rim of the cup, or liner, indicates generally how far away angularly the cup has been placed compared to the target anteversion value. If the cup has also been placed with a target inclination angle relative to the pelvis, and which is 40 in this example, then the plane of the rim of the cup or liner will be parallel to the plane of the equatorial indicium. Hence, at 616 the surgeon may assess the cup anteversion by visually inspecting the trial joint assembly to see how close the equatorial indicium 452 is to parallel to the plane of the mouth of the cup or liner.
[0096] Optionally, at step 616 a range of motion (ROM) assessment can also be carried out. This is generally known in the art and involves articulating the trial hip joint to detect the likely range of articulation possible before impingement of the hip components.
[0097] At 618 an intra-operative X-ray image of the trial joint in the anterior-posterior direction (corresponding to
[0098] It is not necessary that the surgeon carryout any repositioning of the cup. The trial assessment at 616 may be carried out simply to assess the anteversion angle achieved so as to provide some immediate intra-operative feedback of the cup orientation to the surgeon.
[0099] At 620, all the trial femoral components, including the broach, are removed from the femur. Then at 622, the actual prosthetic femoral stem is implanted in the femoral cavity and the prosthetic femoral head is attached. Then at 624, the joint can be reduced and any range of motion trial carried out if desired. The surgical procedure then substantially ends.
[0100] The bent trial femoral neck 400, 500 provides a number of advantages. The bent trial neck 400, 500 can be used with conventional trial femoral heads with an equatorial indicium rather than using special trial heads having specialised alignment markings. Hence, the bent trial neck 400, 500 may be backward compatible with existing trial heads and liners. Also, multiple bent trial necks may be provided each with a different inclination configured to check a different angle. For example, a direct anterior surgical approach might have a target combined anteversion of 20, whereas a posterior surgical approach may have a target combined anteversion of 35. Specific left hip and right hip necks may be provided which can help to prevent any confusion when assembling a trial head on the appropriate bent trial neck for a right or left hip. Also, the trial heads do not need to be attached to the taper 404, 504 with any particular rotational angle making assembly of the trial assembly simpler and easier.
[0101] In this specification, example embodiments have been presented as particular combinations of features. However, a person of ordinary skill in the art would understand that many other embodiments may be practiced which include a different combination of features, including fewer features or a greater number of features. It is intended that the following claims cover all possible embodiments.
[0102] Any instructions and/or flowchart steps may be carried out in any order, unless a specific order is explicitly stated or would be understood to be required from the context of the description. Also, those skilled in the art will recognize that while example methods have been discussed, a variety of other differing methods are possible based on other combinations and/or orders of method steps, and are to be understood within the context provided by this detailed description.
[0103] While the inventions are amenable to various modifications and alternative forms, specific embodiments are shown by way of example in the drawings and described in detail. It should be understood, however, that other embodiments, beyond the specific embodiments described, are possible as well. All modifications, equivalents, and alternative embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims are covered as well.