Apparatus and method for controlling or limiting rotor orbit in moving cavity motors and pumps

Abstract

Techniques involve a motor assembly including a rotor and a stator. The stator includes a contact surface for contacting an outer surface of the rotor. The contact surface includes a rigid material. The motor assembly also includes at least one constraint disposed along a length of the motor assembly, where the constraint constrains a radial and/or tangential movement of the rotor relative to the stator. The at least one constraint may be disposed at one or more proximate ends of the motor assembly, and/or along the length of the motor assembly. The contact surface of the stator may have a profile including peaks and valleys, and in some embodiments, the contact surface may be treated to reduce friction and/or wear.

Claims

1. A motor assembly comprising: a rotor; a stator comprising a contact surface configured to contact an outer surface of the rotor, wherein the contact surface comprises a first rigid material; and at least one constraint disposed along a length of the motor assembly, wherein the constraint is configured to constrain a radial movement of the rotor relative to the stator, and a radial gap between either the at least one constraint and the stator or the at least one constraint and the rotor, wherein the at least one constraint is either (1) fixed relative to the rotor and orbiting with the rotor or (2) fixed relative to the stator, and wherein the at least one constraint comprises at least one passage configured to facilitate a passage of fluid through the at least one constraint.

2. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one constraint is disposed at a proximal end of the motor assembly.

3. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one constraint comprises at least one constraint disposed at an inlet end of the motor assembly and at least one constraint disposed at an outlet end of the motor assembly.

4. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the at least one constraint comprises a plurality of constraints disposed along the length of the motor assembly.

5. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the first rigid material of the stator contact surface comprises at least one of a metal, a composite, a ceramic, a hard plastic, and PCD.

6. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the stator has a profile comprising peak sections and valley sections, and wherein the peak sections comprise the first rigid material and the valley sections comprise a resilient material.

7. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the stator comprises a layer comprising a resilient material and a contact surface layer comprising the first rigid material.

8. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the rotor comprises a contact surface formed from a second rigid material, which is different than the first rigid material.

9. The motor assembly of claim 8, wherein the second rigid material comprises at least one of a metal, a composite, a ceramic, a hard plastic, and PCD.

10. The motor assembly of claim 8, wherein the rotor comprises a layer comprising a resilient material and a contact surface layer comprising the second rigid material.

11. The motor assembly of claim 1, wherein the contact surface is coated or treated to reduce at least one of friction and wear.

12. A progressive cavity motor assembly comprising: a stator comprising a first contact surface comprising a first rigid material; and a rotor comprising a second contact surface comprising a second rigid material, wherein the first contact surface is configured to contact the second contact surface, and wherein the stator comprises a profile comprising peak sections and valley sections, and wherein the peak sections comprise the first rigid material and the valley sections comprise a resilient material.

13. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 12, wherein the first rigid material comprises at least one of a metal, a composite, a ceramic, a hard plastic, or PCD, and wherein the second rigid material comprises at least one of a metal, a composite, a ceramic, a hard plastic, or PCD.

14. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 12, wherein the stator further comprises an elastomer layer comprising an elastomer material, wherein the first contact surface is disposed radially inward and at least partially overlapping the elastomer layer.

15. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 12, wherein the second rigid material is different than the first rigid material.

16. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 15, wherein the second rigid material comprises at least one of a metal, a composite, a ceramic, a hard plastic, and PCD.

17. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 15, wherein the second contact surface is coated or treated to reduce at least one of friction and wear.

18. The progressive cavity motor assembly of claim 12, further comprising at least one constraint in an adjustable bend housing operatively connected to a distal end of the progressive cavity motor assembly, wherein the at least one constraint is configured to constrain a tangential movement of the rotor relative to the stator.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) The motors and pumps disclosed herein will now be described, purely by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

(2) FIG. 1 shows a sectional view of a selection of known rotors

(3) FIG. 2 shows a sectional view of a selection of known stators;

(4) FIG. 3 shows a sectional view of a known moving cavity motor or pump;

(5) FIG. 4 shows a diametral sectional view of a known moving cavity motor or pump;

(6) FIG. 5 shows a sectional view of a first embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor relative to a stator;

(7) FIG. 6 shows a longitudinal sectional view through a moving cavity motor or pump fitted with the apparatus of FIG. 5;

(8) FIG. 7 shows a sectional view of a second embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor relative to a stator;

(9) FIG. 8 shows a sectional view of a third embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor relative to a stator;

(10) FIG. 9 shows a sectional view of a fourth embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor relative to a stator; and

(11) FIG. 10 shows a sectional view of a fifth embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor relative to a stator;

(12) FIG. 11A-11C illustrate cross-sectional and longitudinal section views of a liner configured to maintain concentricity of apparatus for constraining the movement of a rotor relative to a stator according to embodiments disclosed herein;

(13) FIG. 12A shows a sectional view of a first embodiment of a motor or pump having an apparatus for controlling the path and rotation of the rotor relative to the stator;

(14) FIG. 12B shows a longitudinal sectional view through part of a moving cavity motor or pump fitted with the apparatus of FIG. 12A;

(15) FIGS. 13-15 illustrate various mud motor assemblies/drilling assemblies having one or more apparatus for controlling the path and rotation of the rotor relative to the stator.

(16) FIGS. 16-18 illustrate rotors and stators, useful in mud motors, according to embodiments disclosed herein.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(17) Embodiments of the motors or pumps disclosed herein constrain the rotor to maintain a prescribed motion, in other words, they limit the path for the geometric centre of the rotor, and in some cases, lock the rotation to that path. Although various embodiments are illustrated, it will be appreciated that other systems for controlling or limiting the radial and/or tangential movement of the rotor relative to the stator could also be conceived within the scope of the present disclosure. Movement of a rotor relative to a stator is generally limited only by the inherent resilience of the materials used to form the rotor and stator (e.g., deflection/compression of the rubber lining of the stator, etc.). As used herein, constraining the movement of the rotor relative to the stator refers to restricting or limiting the movement to a greater extent than would otherwise result or be permitted by the inherent resilience of the materials used to form the rotor and stator during use.

(18) It should be understood that although the illustrated embodiments have the rotor as a component that revolves within the stator, and indeed most pumps and motors are arranged this way, the embodiments will work equally as well if the inside component is fixed and the outside component rotates.

(19) Referring firstly to FIGS. 5 and 6, these show a first embodiment of an apparatus (20) for controlling or limiting the radial movement of a rotor (22) relative to a stator (24). The apparatus comprises a wheel assembly (20) to be used at one or more locations on the rotor (22). A section through the wheel assembly (20) is shown in FIG. 5.

(20) A bearing wheel (26) is supported onto the rotor shaft (22) through a needle bearing(28), although another suitable bearing could also be used, such as roller bearings or journal bearings. In some embodiments, the bearings (28) are journal bearings comprising silicon carbide, tungsten carbide, silicon nitride or other similarly wear resistant materials. The bearing wheel may be manufactured with steel or other materials suitable for the intended environment. The outside surface of the bearing wheel (26) is designed to slide or roll around the inside surface of the stator body (24) at a position where the profile is approximately circular. The difference in the radius of the bearing wheel (26) and the inside surface of the stator body (24), thereby forming a radial gap (29) between bearing wheel (26) and stator body (24), defines the maximum offset of the rotor axis from the stator axis. The bearing wheel (26) has passages (27) incorporated to increase the area for fluid to flow along the device, where the passages may be of any number or shape, with the proviso that they be large enough to pass any solids that may be in the power fluid or pumped fluid. The stator body (24) has a circular profile where the bearing wheel (26) makes contact, such that the rotor shaft (22) centreline will be constrained to remain approximately within a circle of fixed radius and this helps to prevent the opening of gaps between the rotor (22) and stator (24) surfaces. FIG. 6 shows a longitudinal section through a motor or pump that has been fitted with a wheel assembly (20) according to FIG. 5, at one end only, although additional wheel assemblies may be located at additional locations.

(21) In some embodiments, the bearing wheel (26) may slide or roll in contact with the interior surface of the stator cylinder itself. In other embodiments, the bearing wheel (26) may slide or roll in contact with a coating placed on the interior surface of the stator cylinder. During manufacture of some stators, the interior surface of a cylinder, such as a pipe or tube, is lined, such as by pouring or injecting a liner material onto the interior surface of the cylinder. However, due to the complexity of the stator manufacturing process, concentricity of the resulting stator with the stator cylinder itself cannot be guaranteed. Thus, during manufacture, the resulting stator liner (90) may be offset from the centreline (92) of the stator cylinder (94), such as illustrated in FIG. 11A where the resulting liner has a centreline (96) offset from the centreline (92) of the stator cylinder (94). As noted above, the outside surface of the bearing wheel (26) is designed to slide or roll around the inside surface of the stator body (24) where the profile is approximately circular. The bearing wheel (26) should thus also slide or roll around the inside surface of the coating material, such that the bearing wheel (26) slides or rolls along the same centreline as the stator liner (i.e., aligned with stator liner and rotor, not with the stator cylinder). Manufacture of a stator for use with the bearing wheel (26) may thus include coating, moulding or machining a section (98) of constant diameter (such as 1.6 mm ( 1/16 inch) to 12.8 mm ( inch) thick rubber) at one or both ends of the stator, as illustrated in FIGS. 11B and 11C, so as to ensure that the bearing wheel (26) properly constrains the path of the rotor and provide the desired benefit.

(22) As noted above, the difference in the radius of the bearing wheel (26) and the inside surface of the stator body (24) defines the maximum offset of the rotor axis from the stator axis. Additionally, for proper function, the bearing wheel (26) must maintain a sliding and/or rolling relationship with the inner surface of the stator so as to constrain the rotor through the entire rotation, i.e., maintaining contact over 360. Due to the eccentric rotation of the rotor, the relative diameter of the bearing wheel (26) to that of the interior surface of the stator (90) is an important variable, where an improper ratio may result in irregular contact of the bearing wheel with the inner surface of the stator, i.e., a non-rolling or non-sliding relationship.

(23) In addition to diameter, the length of the bearing wheel (26) must also be sufficient to maintain the side loads imparted due to the wobble of the rotor. Bearing wheel (26) should be of sufficient axial dimensions to address the structural considerations. The length of bearing wheel (26) may thus depend upon the number of lobes, motor/pump torque, and other variables readily recognizable to one skilled in the art, and may also be limited by the available space between the rotor and the drive shaft.

(24) The bearing wheel (26) limits the extent of the wobble imparted by the eccentric motion of the rotor. This, in turn, may limit the formation of flow gaps along the length of the motor/pump by limiting the compression or deflection in the stator lining, such as a rubber or other elastic material. In some embodiments, the bearing wheel may limit the deflection of the stator lining by less than 0.64 mm (0.025 inches); by less than 0.5 mm (0.02 inches) in other embodiments; and by less than 0.38 mm (0.015 inches) in yet other embodiments. Similar deflection limits may also be attained using other embodiments disclosed herein.

(25) Bearing wheel (26), as described above, radially constrains the position of the rotor, keeping the rotor in contact with the stator (i.e., providing an offset contact force without preventing the generation of torque). The resulting reduced normal force at the point of contact between the rotor and stator may reduce the drag forces, improving compression at the contact points, minimizing leakage paths. By limiting the formation of flow gaps (leakage paths) along the length of the rotor, pressure losses may be decreased, increasing the power output of the motor. Additionally, constraining the position of the rotor may reduce stator wear, especially proximate the top of the lobes, where tangential velocities are the highest.

(26) Referring now to FIG. 7, this shows a second embodiment of an apparatus (30) for controlling or limiting the movement of a rotor (32) relative to a stator (34), in which a fixed insert (36) is fitted inside the stator (34). The fixed insert (36) may be provided at one or more locations within the stator (34), and has an inner diameter that is greater then the rotor (32), thereby creating a radial gap (39) between the fixed insert (36) and the rotor (32). The fixed insert (36) has a central hole (38) or similar restriction of the stator (34) inside diameter to limit the radial movement of the rotor (32) relative to the stator (34). The fixed insert (36) may also comprise a plurality of holes (37) to facilitate the passage of fluid along the motor or pump. The fixed insert (36) ensures that the rotor shaft (32) centreline will be constrained to remain approximately within a circle of fixed radius and this helps to prevent the opening of gaps between the rotor (32) and stator (34) surfaces.

(27) Similar to the embodiments of FIGS. 5, 6, and 11, the fixed insert (36) as shown in FIG. 7 may be disposed within a moulded stator profile such that the fixed insert (36) has the same centreline as the stator liner (32). In some embodiments, the fixed insert (36) may be a raised section of the moulded stator profile. In some embodiments, the ratio of the diameter of the fixed insert (36) to the diameter of the rotor (32) may be such that a true or pure rolling diameter is achieved. Bearings may also be used to allow for slip between fixed insert (36) and rotor (32) where a true rolling diameter ratio is not used. Similar issues with respect to flow paths, torque requirements, and axial length of the insert should also be addressed when constraining the rotor according to the embodiment of FIG. 7. With respect to torque requirements, it may be desirable in some embodiments to have an enlarged rotor cross section proximate fixed insert (36), rather than necking down the rotor cross section so as to provide a sliding or rolling relationship.

(28) A third embodiment of an apparatus (40) for controlling or limiting the movement of a rotor (42) relative to a stator (44) is illustrated in FIG. 8. A modified drive shaft (43) is provided at one end of the rotor (42) to restrict the radial motion of the rotor (42). There could also be a similar articulated shaft at the other end to restrict the radial motion of the rotor (42) at that end. The articulation angle at one end of the driveshaft (43) can be limited by, for example, a buffer ring (46) attached to the output shaft in the case of a motor (45) or the input shaft in the case of a pump (45), such that when contact is made, there is a limit imposed on the radial motion of the rotor. An equivalent embodiment could have the buffer ring (46) attached to the rotor (42) and this would similarly restrict the radial motion of the rotor (42). The driveshaft (43) ensures that the rotor shaft centreline will be constrained to remain approximately within a circle of fixed radius and this helps to prevent the opening of gaps between the rotor and stator surfaces.

(29) A fourth embodiment of an apparatus (50) for controlling or limiting the movement of a rotor (52) relative to a stator (54) is shown in FIG. 9. The apparatus (50) consists of a rotatable circular insert (56) which is fitted inside the stator body (54) and able to rotate about the longitudinal axis relative to the stator (54). The rotatable insert (56) may be provided at one or more locations within the stator (54). The rotation of the insert (56) relative to the stator (54) is facilitated by a bearing between the stator and the insert (not shown). An aperture (58) is provided in the insert (56), with the centre of the aperture (58) offset from the centre of the insert (56) by a distance equal to the maximum permissible offset of the rotor axis from the stator axis. The diameter of the aperture (58) is of sufficient size to allow the rotor (52) to pass through and rotate freely. A further bearing (not shown) is provided between the insert (56) and the rotor (52) to facilitate the rotation of the rotor (52) relative to the insert (56). The circular insert (56) is penetrated by holes (57) to allow the passage of fluid along the motor or pump. The insert (56) ensures that the rotor shaft (52) centreline will be constrained to remain approximately within a circle of fixed radius and this helps to prevent the opening of gaps between the rotor (52) and stator (54) surfaces.

(30) A fifth embodiment of an apparatus (60) for controlling or limiting the movement of a rotor (62) relative to a stator (64) is illustrated in FIG. 10. A plurality of pistons (65), reacted by constrained material (66) which could be solid, liquid or gaseous, are used to limit the radial motion of the rotor (62). The piston assembly (65) may be provided at one or more locations within the stator (64). FIG. 10 shows an example where eight such pistons (65) are used, although a different number of pistons could also be used. The cylinder housings (63) to contain the pistons (65) are machined into a circular insert (67) which is fitted inside the stator body (64) and is of sufficient thickness to prevent the loads imposed from causing structural failure. The circular insert (67) is provided with a plurality of holes (68) to allow fluid to pass along the motor or pump. When the rotor (62) makes contact with a piston (65), the constrained material (66) is compressed and prevents free motion of the piston (65), thus limiting the motion of the rotor (62). The apparatus (60) ensures that the rotor shaft (62) centreline will be constrained to remain approximately within a circle of fixed radius and this helps to prevent the opening of gaps between the rotor (62) and stator (64) surfaces.

(31) As described above, the embodiments illustrated in and described with respect to FIGS. 5-11 provide for limiting or constraining the extent of the radial movement of the rotor (i.e., limiting the orbital trajectory and path of the rotor during rotation). The embodiments disclosed herein may effectively limit outward radial movement, such as the restraint illustrated in FIG. 5, and may also limit the inward radial movement of the rotor, such as the restraint illustrated in FIG. 9.

(32) In addition to the relatively circular means for constraining radial movement as illustrated in FIGS. 5-11, it is also possible to constrain movement of the rotor using a non-circular restraint, such as illustrated in FIGS. 12A (profile view) and 12B (longitudinal section view). In this embodiment, a precession apparatus (70) comprising a lobed wheel (72) of similar, but not identical profile to that of rotor (74), is operably connected to rotor shaft (75). Similarly, lobed wheel (72) would engage a track (76) of similar, but not identical, profile to that of stator (78). Track (76) may be formed of a material similar to that of stator (78), or may be a material that is less compressible than stator (78), such as a harder rubber, hard plastic, ceramic, PDC/diamond, or steel. A precession apparatus (70) may be used at one or more locations along rotor (74). In addition to addressing forces encountered at the inlet end or outlet end of the motor by location and/or materials of construction, the profile of track (76) may be similar to that of stator (78), and the respective sections (76, 78) may be out of phase to a degree, such that the orbital path of the rotor within stator (78) is constrained. In other words, the sections may be out of phase such that the forces of operation that distort the rotor from an ideal orbit are balanced and effectively constrain the orbital path of the rotor.

(33) Precession apparatus (70) controls the rotor (74) such that it will move on a prescribed path and with a prescribed rotation relative to stator (78). This type of restraint may effectively lock the rotation of the rotor to its orbit position. The lobed wheel (72) engages with lobed track (76) such that the relative profiles of the lobed wheel (72) and track (76) fix the path and rotation of the rotor (74) to prescribed values.

(34) The lobed wheel (72) is connected to the rotor shaft (75) in a substantially fixed way. The ratio of the number of lobes on the wheel (72) to the number of lobes on the track (76) is limited to the same ratio as the number of lobes on the rotor (74) to the number of lobes on the stator (78). The profiles of the lobes on the wheel (72) and on the track (76) will determine the extent to which the rotor (74) can deform the sealing surface of the stator (78) and therefore limits the opening of gaps between them.

(35) To allow some rotational compliance, the surface of the lobed wheel (72) or the track (76) may have a flexible layer added of, for example, rubber. The lobed wheel (72) and track (76) could have parallel sides or incorporate a helix angle to allow for some small axial movement and accommodate manufacturing tolerances.

(36) The profile and composition (material of construction, compressibility, etc.) of lobed wheel (72) may be designed such that the deformation of the rubber in stator (78) is limited. In other embodiments, the profile and composition of lobed wheel (72) may be designed such that the deformation of the rubber in stator (78) is maintained to a fixed value. In this manner, the interaction between the rotor (74) and the rubber in stator (78) is used to maintain sealing, with the torque being generated largely on lobed wheel (72). This not only allows pressure loading up to the point where the seal would fail (a very high pressure) but it also ensures that the contact forces in the rubber can be kept substantially independent of pressure magnitude. This should reduce wear and fatigue failure in the rubber as well as improve motor/pump efficiency.

(37) Motors according to embodiments disclosed herein may be used, for example, as a mud motor in a drilling assembly. Referring to FIG. 13, in operation a drilling fluid is pumped into the inlet end (102) of a mud motor (100) at a higher pressure than that at the outlet end (104), generating forces on the rotor (105) and causing the rotor (105) to rotate. Rotor (105) is operably connected to a drive shaft (106) for converting the orbital rotation of the rotor (105) to a rotation about a fixed axis (108). The distal end of the drive shaft (not shown) is directly or indirectly coupled to a drill bit (not shown), rotation of which may be used to drill through an underground formation.

(38) Forces imposed on the rotor (105) during operation include those due to the pressure differential across the motor (100) from inlet (proximal) end (102) to outlet (distal) end (104). The pressure differential may result in a pitching moment. There is also a downward force exerted on the drill string, commonly referred to as weight on bit, where this force is necessarily transmitted through the rotordrive shaftdrill bit couplings. The orbital-axial relationship of the drive shaft coupling may result in angular and/or radial forces being applied to rotor (105). Rotation of rotor (105) also results in tangential forces.

(39) Each of these forces may have an impact on the manner in which rotor (105) interacts with stator (114) (e.g., compressive forces generating seals along the edges of the resulting cavities, sliding, drag, or frictional forces between rotor (105) and stator (114) as the rotor rotates, etc.), and may cause a gap to form along the length of the motor (100), reducing motor efficiency. Additionally, the impact of these forces may be different proximate inlet end (102) and outlet end (104). The various apparatus disclosed herein for constraining the rotor as discussed above may be used to control or limit the movement of rotor (105) proximate inlet end 102, outlet end 104, or both.

(40) Other examples of various motors (100) using constrained rotors as disclosed herein, such as for use in drilling operations, are illustrated in FIGS. 14-15, where like numerals represent like parts. As illustrated and discussed with respect to FIG. 13, embodiments of motor (100) may includes a constraint (118) proximate outlet (distal) end (104) to constrain the movement of rotor (105). As illustrated in FIG. 14, embodiments of motor (100) may include a constraint (120) proximate inlet (proximal) end (102) to constrain the movement of rotor (105). As illustrated in FIG. 15, embodiments of motor (100) may include constraint (118), (120) proximate inlet end (102) and outlet end (104), respectively, to constrain the movement of rotor (105).

(41) When two or more constraints are used, such as in FIG. 15, the constraints (118), (120) may be the same or different. For example, as described above, forces imparted on the rotor (105) may be different at the inlet end than they are at the outlet end, resulting in different radii of orbits for the rotor centre at the inlet and outlet ends. Thus, it may be preferable to have a restraint limiting the radial movement of rotor (105) proximate inlet end (102), such as the restraint illustrated in FIG. 5, that may work effectively in combination with a restraint limiting the inward radial motion of the rotor, such as the restraint illustrated in FIG. 9 or FIGS. 12A, 12B. In this manner, the restraints may effectively limit the gap size formed between the rotor and stator, improving motor efficiency.

(42) Although FIG. 15 is illustrated with one constraint at each of the inlet end and the outlet end, either or both of the inlet and outlet ends may be constrained with multiple constraining devices. For example, the inlet end and/or outlet end may include a radial constraint, such as illustrated in FIG. 5, and a lobed constraint, such as illustrated in FIG. 12, in series.

(43) The multiple constraints (one or multiple at each end or both ends) should be selected and/or designed so as to complement each other, achieving the desired improvement in sealing (elimination of flow gaps) while not negatively impacting rotor operation or wear. For example, the constraints at the inlet and outlet ends may both act in the same direction or similar phases so as to not put opposing loads on the rotor and to avoid lock-up of the rotor due to conflicting forces. In this manner, the operation of the motor may be improved without fear of motor seizure.

(44) The apparatuses disclosed herein may be used to constrain the radial and/or tangential movement of a rotor relative to a stator, decreasing, minimizing, or eliminating the flow gaps along the length of the motor, thereby improving motor efficiency. Apparatuses disclosed herein may also reduce stator wear.

(45) Improvements in motor efficiency, such as sealing improvements and higher power output per length, as noted above, may be used, in some embodiments, to shorten the overall length of the motor while attaining a desired power output. A shortened power section may have numerous benefits and applications, as discussed below.

(46) The limited overall axial length of the power section may allow for flow of solids, such a drilling mud including solid materials, through the motor without issue, even where both the rotor and stator have contact surfaces formed from rigid materials. The limited overall axial length may also provide flexibility in materials of construction that would otherwise be cost prohibitive.

(47) In some embodiments, the rotor and/or the stator may be formed from a metal, composite, ceramic, PDC/diamond, hard plastic, or stiff rubber structural material. For example, both the rotor and stator may be formed from a metal, providing metal-to-metal contact along the length of the power section.

(48) In other embodiments, the rotor and/or stator may be formed with a resilient layer (such as NBR rubber) and a hard layer, such as a hard rubber or plastic, ceramic, composite, or metal coating disposed as the contact surface on top of the resilient inner layer. For example, the rotor may be a metal, similar to currently produced rotors, and the stator may be a metal-coated rubber, where the metal layer is the layer contacting the rotor during operation of the motor. Similarly, a hard rubber or reinforced rubber layer may be provided as the innermost layer contacting the rotor. Typical layered stators disclosed in the prior art provide for a hard or reinforced inner elastomeric layer, opposite that of the present embodiments, to provide for the desired compression and sealing properties of the outer layer. However, due to the decreased axial length of the power sections, use of a rigid contact layer may be possible, improving wear properties of the motor (rotor, stator, or both) while providing the desired power output. While exemplified with a multi-layered stator, multi-layered rotors may also be used, such as a rotor having a metal core to provide torque capacity, an elastomeric material disposed on the core, and a metal shell. These embodiments are illustrated in FIGS. 16 and 17 for the rotor and stator, respectively, where the stator (FIG. 16) may include a metal housing 1602, an elastomer layer 1604, and a rigid layer 1606 providing contact surface 1608, and the rotor (FIG. 17) may include a metal core 1702, an elastomer layer 1704, and a rigid layer or shell 1706 providing contact surface 1708.

(49) Where the corresponding contacting portions of the rotor and stator(s) are both rigid, such as a metal, hard plastic, composite, or ceramic, for example, it may be desirable to limit the friction, wear, and other undesirable interactions between the rotor and stator that may cause premature failure or seizure of the rotating component. The contact surfaces of the insert and/or the rotor may be coated or treated to reduce at least one of friction and wear. Treatments may include chroming, HVOF or HVAF coating, and diffusing during sintering, among others. Metal-to-metal (rigid-to-rigid) power sections may also provide sufficient clearance to be tolerant of debris, but tight enough to constrain the rotor motion close to ideal, achieving the above-noted benefits, without use of constraining devices.

(50) Similarly, the relatively short contact length between the constraining devices and the rotor or stator may provide for flexibility in materials, and similar combinations of hard materials or hard-coated materials may be used for the constraining devices.

(51) Alternatively, a resilient elastomer may be used as the contact surface on both the rotor and stator. The reduction in the otherwise high frictional loads attained by the constraining devices may provide for use of elastomeric stators and rotors in combination to attain a desired pump performance (power output, wear properties, etc.).

(52) The benefits from use of constraining devices may also provide for alternative stator designs. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 18, a stator may be formed using a hybrid or tailored material profile. As illustrated in FIG. 18, the peaks and valleys of the stator 1805 may be formed from different materials, where the valleys 1807 are formed from a resilient elastomeric material 1810, and the peaks 1812 are formed from a rigid material 1815, such as a hard plastic, hard rubber, metal, ceramic, or composite material. The forces encountered during rotor nutation differ for the peaks and valleys, where the valleys encounter compressive forces and the peaks endure sliding forces. The hybrid construction may result in contact of the rotor, which may be a metal, with the rigid material of the stator peaks, which may also be a metal, but allows for flow of solids, such a drilling mud including solid materials, through the motor without issue.

(53) One potential benefit of a constrained motor may be a reduction in vibrations associated with the mud motor. Constrained lateral forces may result in less wobble or a narrower orbital path as compared to an un-constrained motor. As a result of reduced vibrations, drilling may be improved, such as by resulting in one or more of a better hole quality, an even-gage hole, and improved steering.

(54) A reduction in the axial length of the motor may also provide the ability to modify the drill string components to incorporate a motor. For example, an adjustable bend housing typically includes a transmission shaft to transmit torque generated from the power section of the drilling motor to a bearing section of the drilling motor. Due to the potential reduction in size of the motor due to the constraining devices disclosed herein, it may be possible to incorporate a motor into the bent housing along with the transmission shaft. Similarly, motors according to embodiments herein may advantageously be incorporated into a stabilizer, a steering head, or other various portions of the bottom hole assembly (BHA).

(55) The decreased axial length may also facilitate disposal of wire through the motor and provide space for additional downhole instrumentation, such as instrumentation to monitor the motor and/or components below the motor. Instrumentation may beneficially monitor motor RPM, pressure drop, and other factors, possibly avoiding stalls and allowing operation of the motor at high efficiency or peak efficiency, each of which may result in improved drilling performance (increased rate of penetration, less downtime due to stalled motors, etc.).

(56) While described above with respect to a constraining device being located proximate the rotor in a motor assembly, such as illustrated in FIG. 13, one skilled in the art would appreciate that a transmission shaft extending from the rotor to a lower drillstring component and including or operative with a constraining devices may also be used to improve rotor sealing and motor efficiency. For example, a radial constraint may be disposed on or operative with a transmission shaft within an upper end of an adjustable bend housing that is connected to the motor assembly/motor sub. This may effectively move the constraining device to a stiffer housing and away from the stator tube, which may provide various benefits such as extended lifespan of the equipment, among other advantages.

(57) The embodiments illustrated herein are provided purely by way of example and it will be appreciated that other systems for controlling or limiting the movement of the rotor relative to the stator could also be conceived within the scope of the concepts disclosed herein.

(58) It will also be understood that although the illustrated embodiments have the rotor as a component that revolves within the stator, and indeed most pumps and motors are arranged this way, the embodiments disclosed herein will work equally as well if the inside component is fixed and the outside component rotates.