Controlling a lightning protection system

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for controlling a lightning protection system comprising a descent path. The method is characterized in that it comprises steps for: sending (E1) a radiofrequency signal to one end of the descent path, measuring (E2) a reflection coefficient, predetermining (E2) resonance frequencies of the descent path; and, comparing (E3) the predetermined resonance frequencies with preset resonance frequencies.

Claims

1. A method for testing a lightning protection system comprising a down path with a tree structure comprising the following steps: transmitting a radiofrequency signal at one end of the down path, measuring a reflection coefficient, determining resonant frequencies of the down path based on the transmitted radiofrequency signal and the measured reflection coefficient, and comparing the determined resonant frequencies with predetermined resonant frequencies.

2. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining resonant frequencies of the down path includes determination of resonant frequencies as a function of local minimum values of the amplitude of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency.

3. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining resonant frequencies of the down path includes determination of resonant frequencies as a function of inflection points of the phase of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency.

4. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining resonant frequencies of the down path includes determination of resonant frequencies as a function of local maximum values of the derivative of the phase of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency.

5. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the comparison step includes a comparison of resonant frequencies with resonant frequencies of the down path without any faults.

6. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, wherein the comparison step includes a comparison of resonant frequencies with resonant frequencies of the down path containing predetermined breaks.

7. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, used in a vector network analyzer.

8. The method for testing a lightning protection system according to claim 1, used for a wind turbine lightning protection system.

9. A non-transitory computer readable medium containing instructions for execution of the steps in the method according to claim 1 when executed by a computer.

10. A device for testing a lightning protection system comprising a down path with a tree structure, the device including: at least one computer having a processor and memory configured to: transmit a radiofrequency signal at one end of the down path, measure a reflection coefficient, determine resonant frequencies of the down path based on the transmitted radiofrequency signal and the measured reflection coefficient, and compare the determined resonant frequencies with predetermined resonant frequencies.

11. A wind turbine lightning protection system, comprising the testing device for a lightning protection system according to claim 10.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) Other characteristics and advantages will become clear after reading the following description of a preferred embodiment given as a non-limitative example, described with reference to the figures in which:

(2) FIG. 1 represents a wind turbine,

(3) FIG. 2 represents a wind turbine blade equipped with a lightning protection system,

(4) FIG. 3a represents an electrical circuit equivalent to the lightning protection system, in the test configuration, according to one embodiment of this invention,

(5) FIG. 3b represents an embodiment of the test device, according to one embodiment of this invention,

(6) FIG. 4 represents a test of the lightning protection system, according to one embodiment of this invention,

(7) FIGS. 5a to 5c represent the amplitude, the phase and the derivative of the phase of a reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency, according to one embodiment of this invention.

DETAILED PRESENTATION OF PARTICULAR EMBODIMENTS

(8) According to one embodiment shown on FIG. 1, a wind turbine 1 generally comprises a tower 10 fixed to the ground, a nacelle supported by the tower and housing a rotor hub 12 supporting blades 13 and mounted free to rotate about a rotor axis. Each blade 13 comprises a base connected to the rotor hub 12, and prolonging with a slender aerodynamic profile to an end, in a well-known manner.

(9) The mechanical structure of the wind turbine is conventional, but its lightning protection system is described below.

(10) FIG. 2 diagrammatically illustrates a blade 13 of the wind turbine 1. The blade 13 is globally in the form of one or several spars not shown, and an aerodynamic outer skin 131 fixed to the spar. These elements are conventional and will not be described herein.

(11) The blade 13 comprises a lightning protection system.

(12) This system comprises at least one lightning receptor 132. This is a metallic element flush with the external surface, close to the end of the blade. Preferably, the lightning protection system comprises a plurality of lightning receptors 132, distributed on the outer surface of the blade. In the example shown on FIG. 2, the blade comprises two end receptors positioned symmetrically in a plane transverse to a plane of symmetry of the blade, and two median receptors, also positioned symmetrically in the same transverse plane. Obviously, the number and the arrangement of the receptors can be different.

(13) The receptors 132 are connected to one or several lightning down cables 133, through cables 136. This electrical conductors system forms a tree structure containing different trunk and branch sections. This structure thus forms a down path that extends between the receptor(s) located close to the end of the blade and the hub 12 at which the down path includes an earthed terminal 135.

(14) The following description is particularly concerned with this down path.

(15) FIG. 3a represents the electrical circuit equivalent to the lightning protection system, in the test configuration, according to one embodiment of this invention.

(16) The purpose of the test is to measure the continuity of the electrical circuit of the lightning protection system.

(17) To achieve this, the connection terminal 135 of the down path is disconnected from the earth and is connected to a test device that injects a radio frequency electrical signal into the down path, and then the reflected electrical signal is measured. The test device preferably comprises a vector network analyser 20. This operation is done at the hub of the rotor. In another embodiment, the vector network analyser 20 is connected to any lightning receptor 132. In this case there is no need to disconnect the earthing terminal 135.

(18) The vector network analyser 20 is used to make a radio frequency measurement at a single port.

(19) The principle of the measurement is based on reflectometry in the frequency domain.

(20) FIG. 3b represents a particular embodiment of the test device, according to this invention.

(21) The general structure of the test device is that of a computer. In particular, it comprises a processor 100 running a computer program implementing the method according to the invention that will be described below, a memory 101, an input interface 102 and an output interface 103.

(22) These different elements are connected conventionally through a bus 105.

(23) The input interface 102 is connected to the connection terminal 135 of the down path. The interface 102 produces data representing the measurements made.

(24) The processor 100 performs the processing described below. This processing is done in the form of code instructions of the computer program that are stored in the memory 101 before being executed by the processor 100.

(25) The output interface 103 is a human-machine interface 104 that provides information to an operator about the down path that has been tested.

(26) FIG. 4 represents the method of testing the lightning protection system, according to one embodiment of this invention. The method comprises steps E1 to E4 making use of the vector network analyser 20.

(27) Step E1 transmits a sinusoidal radiofrequency signal at one end of the down path. The amplitude and the phase of the transmitted signal are predetermined. The frequency of the transmitted signal varies between two boundaries.

(28) The next step E2 measures the amplitude of the phase of the reflected signal on the same port, in order to determine resonant frequencies of the down path.

(29) In particular, the reflection coefficient at the input, called the S.sub.11 parameter, is measured with the vector network analyser 20. The S.sub.11 parameter is the ratio between the amplitudes and phases of the transmitted and reflected signals. When the frequency of the transmitted signal varies, a frequency scan of the S.sub.11 parameter is obtained.

(30) This frequency scan of the S.sub.11 parameter is used to determine the resonant frequencies of the down path that depend on the lengths of the different sections of the branches 136 and the trunk 133 of the down path.

(31) The different variants in the determination of resonant frequencies are illustrated on FIGS. 5a to 5c.

(32) FIG. 5a represents the amplitude of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency. The resonant frequencies can be determined as a function of local minima of this amplitude.

(33) FIG. 5b represents the phase of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency. Resonant frequencies correspond to inflection points on the phase curve.

(34) FIG. 5c represents the derivative of the phase of the reflection coefficient as a function of the frequency. Resonant frequencies correspond to local maxima of this curve.

(35) The example shown includes four resonant frequencies.

(36) Working on the derivative of the phase mitigates the problem of a possible slow drift in the offset and a potential calibration fault of the instrument.

(37) Resonant frequencies depend on the lengths of the different sections of the down path.

(38) The next step E3 compares the previously detected resonant frequencies with predetermined resonant frequencies. These predetermined resonant frequencies are preferably composed of several sets. Firstly, they include resonant frequencies of the down path without any faults. This is the signature of the down path. Sets of frequencies corresponding to predetermined breaks in the down path can then also be created. These can be used to identify faults in the down path.

(39) It is thus possible to determine if the integrity of the down path has been maintained, and if not, to qualify the detected fault.

(40) The next step E4 is to produce a message indicating the result of the previous comparison step. For example, if the determined resonant frequencies correspond to the fault-free down path, then no degradation has occurred in the down path.

(41) Otherwise, the down path is degraded and if the determined resonant frequencies correspond to resonant frequencies associated with a predefined degradation, then the degradation of the down path corresponds to this predefined degradation.

(42) The test is thus made easily and economically. An operator accesses the down path connection terminal, at the hub of the rotor 12.

(43) The invention has been described for a wind turbine blade, but it can be transposed to other applications. For example, the test according to the invention can be applied to a lightning protection system in a building.