Method and System for Improving the Surface Fracture Toughness of Brittle Materials, and a Cutting Tool Produced by Such Method
20200102634 ยท 2020-04-02
Inventors
- Claudia Polese (Johannesburg, ZA)
- Daniel Glaser (Johannesburg, ZA)
- Lesley A. Cornish (Johannesburg, ZA)
- Rodney M. Genga (Johannesburg, ZA)
Cpc classification
C22F3/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B22F2005/001
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F2998/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F2998/10
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F3/105
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F3/105
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C22C29/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B22F3/24
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
C22F3/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C22C29/06
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B22F3/105
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B22F5/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
This invention concerns a method of improving the wear resistance of a cemented carbide. The method includes using fracture toughness as a selection criterion and selecting a cemented carbide which has a fracture toughness between about 6 and about 15 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2. The method further includes applying a sacrificial coating to the cemented carbide and increasing the fracture toughness of the cemented carbide by creating a toughened surface layer using laser shock peening, thereby increasing its fracture resistance to fatigue and stress corrosion cracking. The invention also concerns a cutting tool or a cutting tool insert made from a cemented carbide and treated using the method according to the invention.
Claims
1. A method of improving the wear resistance of a cemented carbide, the method including: using fracture toughness as a selection criterion and selecting a cemented carbide which has a fracture toughness between about 6 and about 15 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2; applying a sacrificial coating to the cemented carbide; and increasing the fracture toughness of the cemented carbide by creating a toughened surface layer using laser shock peening, thereby increasing its fracture resistance to fatigue and stress corrosion cracking.
2. A method according to claim 1, including inducing residual compressive stresses in a substrate of the cemented carbide without changing its microstructure.
3. A method according to claim 1, wherein the energy being delivered to the brittle material during the LSP process is in the range of about 300 mJ to about 600 mJ.
4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the energy being delivered to the brittle material during the LSP process is in the range of about 410 mJ to about 440 mJ.
5. A method according to claim 1, wherein the spot size of the laser used in the laser shock peening is between about 0.7 to about 1.2 mm.
6. A method according to claim 1, wherein the LSP process has a pulse duration of between about 7 ns and about 10 ns (FWHM).
7. A method according to claim 1, wherein the LSP process has a pulse duration of about 8.6 ns (FWHM).
8. A method according to claim 1, wherein the LSP process has a power Intensity of between about 1 and about 20 GW/cm.sup.2.
9. A method according to claim 1, wherein the LSP process has a power Intensity of between about 7.5 and about 8.5 GW/cm.sup.2.
10. A method according to claim 1, wherein the LSP process has an overlap of between 0 and 90%.
11. A method according to claim 1, wherein the sacrificial coating is a thermo-protective coating in the form of black PVC tape.
12. A method according to claim 1, including using an inertia containment medium in the form of a laser transparent medium.
13. A method according to claim 12, wherein the laser transparent medium is water.
14. A method according to claim 1, including producing the brittle material by means of rapid sintering.
15. A method according to claim 14, wherein the rapid sintering is in the form of spark plasma sintering (SPS).
16. A method according to claim 1, wherein the cemented carbide is selected from the group consisting of WCXYCo, NbCXYCo and NbCXYNi, where X is either one or a combination of Cr.sub.3C.sub.2, Mo.sub.2C, TiC, SiC, TaC and VC, and Y is the weight percentage of the binder phase and is in the range 4 to 16%.
17. A method according to claim 16, wherein Y is the weight percentage of the binder phase and is in the range 8 to 10%.
18. A method of manufacturing a cutting tool having a cemented carbide cutting insert, including improving the wear resistance of the cemented carbide using the method according to claim 1.
19. A cutting tool manufactured using the method of claim 18, the cutting tool comprising a core made from a cemented carbide, which has a fracture toughness between 6 and 15 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2, and a surface layer toughened by laser shock peening, wherein the processed surface layer has an increased fracture toughness compared to the fracture toughness of the core.
20. A cutting tool according to claim 19, wherein the cemented carbide is selected from the group consisting of WCXYCo, NbCXYCo and NbCXYNi, where X is either one or a combination of Cr.sub.3C.sub.2, Mo.sub.2C, TiC, SiC, TaC and VC, and Y is the weight percentage of the binder phase and is in the range 4 to 16%.
21. A cutting tool according to claim 20, wherein Y is the weight percentage of the binder phase and is in the range 8 to 10%.
22. A system for performing laser shock peening on a cemented carbide, the system including a laser source capable of delivering between about 300 mJ to about 600 mJ to the cemented carbide at a pulse duration of between about 7 ns and about 10 ns (FWHM) and a power intensity of between about 1 and about 20 GW/cm.sup.2, a sacrificial coating for application to the cemented carbide during laser shock peening and inertia containment medium in the form of a laser transparent medium.
23. A system according to claim 22, wherein the sacrificial coating is a sacrificial thermo-protective coating in the form of black PVC tape.
24. A system according to claim 22, wherein the spot size of the laser produced by the laser source is between about 0.7 to about 1.2 mm.
25. A system according to claim 22, wherein the laser source capable of delivering between about 410 mJ to about 440 mJ to the cemented carbide.
26. A system according to claim 22, wherein the power intensity is between about 7.5 and about 8.5 GW/cm.sup.2.
27. A system according to claim 22, wherein the pulse duration is about 8.6 ns.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0040] The invention will now be described in more detail, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
[0054] Before any embodiments of the invention are explained in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited in its application to the details of construction and the arrangement of components set forth in the following description or illustrated in the following drawings. The invention is capable of other embodiments and of being practiced or of being carried out in various ways. Also, it is to be understood that the phraseology and terminology used herein is for the purpose of description and should not be regarded as limiting. The use of including, comprising, or having and variations thereof herein is meant to encompass the items listed thereafter and equivalents thereof as well as additional items. It is noted that, as used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms a, an, and the, and any singular use of any word, include plural referents unless expressly and unequivocally limited to one referent. As used herein, the term include and its grammatical variants are intended to be non-limiting, such that recitation of items in a list is not to the exclusion of other like items that can be substituted or added to the listed items.
[0055] A non-limiting example of a method of improving the wear resistance of brittle materials will now be described. In the context of this description the term brittle materials describe materials that have a combination of Shetty's fracture toughness of between 6 and 15 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2 and a Vickers microhardness of between 9 and 17 GPa. The method preferably includes introducing compressive stresses in the brittle material, such as ceramics, cemented carbides or cermets, by performing laser shock peening (LSP). In the exemplified method discussed in detail below, various cermets are used. These cermets are typically selected from the group consisting of WCXYCo, NbCXYCo and NbCXYNi, where X is either one or a combination of Cr.sub.3C.sub.2, Mo.sub.2C, TiC, SiC, TaC and VC, and Y is the weight percentage of the binder phase and is in the range about 4 to about 16%, preferably about 8 to 10%. In the method described under the discussion of the experimental results the cermets include WC-0.8Cr.sub.3C.sub.2-12Co, NbC-12Co and NbC-12Ni. It should however be understood that the method is not limited to these cermets and could be used on other brittle materials. It is further envisaged that the cemented carbides or cermets described in this specification could find particular application in the manufacturing of cutting tools, mining tools and tools used in other industrial applications where wear resistance and fracture toughness are important criteria. In this specification the word tool should be interpreted to include an insert for the tool where the insert defines the cutting edge.
[0056] As mentioned above, the NbCCo cermets produced by conventional liquid phase sintering (LPS) have a lower hardness and fracture toughness than WCCo cermets, because of NbC grain growth. In order to reduce the grain size of the NbC a rapid sintering technique, such as spark plasma sintering (SPS), is used. It has been found that due to the reduction in grain size resulting from the SPS there is an improvement in the hardness and wear resistance. However, a negligible change in K.sub.IC is achieved by the SPS process. Prior to conducing any surface treatments, such as laser shock peening, one way of improving the K.sub.IC is by alteration of the composition of the cermet. For example, the composition can be altered by complete or partial substation of Co binder with Ni. Nickel has a higher plasticity than Co and always retains the more ductile f.sub.cc structure (it has no phase transformation like Co), which increases the K.sub.IC, but reduces hardness.
[0057] In the SPS process, powder compositions are consolidated in a spark plasma sintering furnace. The powders are poured into cylindrical graphite dies with inner and outer diameters of about 20.9 mm and about 40 mm respectively, and about 48 mm height. The composite powder assemblies are heated in a vacuum (typically about 2 Pa) in two steps with different sintering profiles, depending on the powder compositions, to achieve good densification. For example, WC-10Co (wt %) powders are first heated to 1 000 C. at a heating rate of 200 C./min and subsequently to 1220 C. at a heating rate of 100 C./min, and the temperature is held at 1 220 C. for 5 minutes during sintering. A cooling rate of 200 C./min is applied to all cermets. The applied pressure is adjusted from 16 MPa to 30 MPa at 1000 C., and from 30 MPa to 50 MPa at 1220 C. within 30 seconds. The pressure is then held constant at 50 MPa throughout the rapid sintering cycle. Horizontal and vertical graphite papers are used to separate the powders from the die and punch set-up. Hexagonal boron nitride is placed on the graphite paper to prevent carbon diffusion from the graphite paper to the powders during sintering.
[0058] Next, the cermet's resistance to crack-based phenomena such as fatigue and stress corrosion cracking is improved by means of a surface treatment. In the preferred method the surface treatment is in the form of laser shock peening (LSP). After sintering, the cermet is polished using standard metallographic procedures and LSP is performed on the cermet's polished surface.
[0059] An optimised combination of LSP parameters of laser power intensity, spot size and spot coverage is applied to the cermet using a thin water layer as the inertial confinement medium. The inventors have identified that the following optimised laser shock peening process conditions result in compressive stresses being introduced in the surface of the cermet: [0060] 1. Energy: between about 20 mJ to about 100 000 mJ, preferably between about 300 mJ and about 600 mJ, most preferably between about 410 mJ to about 440 mJ; [0061] 2. Spot size: between about 0.7 to about 1.2 mm; [0062] 3. Pulse duration: about 0.5 ns to about 50 ns (FWHM), preferably between about 7 and about 10 ns, more preferably about 8.6 ns; [0063] 4. Power Intensity: about 1 to about 20 GW/cm.sup.2, preferably about 7.5 to about 8.5 GW/cm.sup.2; and [0064] 5. Overlay: from 0% to 90% overlap.
[0065] During the LSP process, a sacrificial thermo-protective overlay or coating is applied to the cermet. It has been found that PVC tape, preferably black, is particularly effective as a sacrificial coating. A laser transparent medium, such as water for example, could also be used as an inertia containment medium during the LSP process.
[0066] In the above method, LSP is performed on the cutting tool or insert prior to applying any surface coating, such as a hard film coating. It is envisaged that an uncoated cutting tool or insert could be peened using LSP to improve mechanical fracture properties and thereafter coated with an external coating to improve other properties, such as chemical stability and high temperature resistance. The method of improving wear resistance in accordance with the invention is therefore applied to a coating-free cutting tool or insert.
Experimental Results
[0067] Experimental testing was carried out on cermets produced by the above process in order to compare their mechanical properties to cermets produced by conventional methods. Cermets with the lowest K.sub.IC were used as control samples during optimisation of the LSP parameters to ensure that the induced compressive residual stress would not result in crack formation. The optimised combination of parameters was then applied to all the cermets.
[0068] The conventional cermets used in the experimental testing were produced by liquid phase sintering. In particular, the liquid phase sintering was performed by heating the powders in a vacuum (0.04 MPa) at an initial heating rate of 2.4 C./min up to 1200 C. At 1200 C., cobalt loss protection (CLP) was carried out by adding argon gas at a pressure of 0.37 MPa, and a heating rate 3.5 C./min up to 1430 C. The temperature was held constant for 75 minutes, and for the last 20 minutes, hot isostatic pressing (HIP) was done at 4.4 MPa to eliminate all the surface porosity. The furnace was then water cooled at a rate of 3.5 C./min.
[0069] The different sintered samples used in the experimental tests are shown in Table 1 below.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Samples and sintering processes Samples (wt %) Sintering process WC0.8Cr.sub.3C.sub.212Co Liquid phase sintering WC0.8Cr.sub.3C.sub.212Co Spark plasma sintering NbC12Co Liquid phase sintering NbC12Co Spark plasma sintering NbC12Ni Liquid phase sintering NbC12Ni Spark plasma sintering F1 Liquid phase sintering F1 Spark plasma sintering C1 Liquid phase sintering
[0070] F1 and C1 are NbC based cermets with proprietary carbide additives to improve their abrasive resistance properties.
[0071] Archimedes' principle was used to determine the density of the sintered cermets. Microstructures of the cemented carbides were examined in a field emission scanning electron microscope, with energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy. Vickers microhardnesses (HV.sub.30) were measured on polished specimens before and after LSP, using a load of 30 N, calculating an average from five indentations on different regions of each cermet. The following criteria for the accurate derivation of fracture toughness (K.sub.IC) using Shetty's equation were satisfied:
c/a>1.3 and 0.25l/a2.5,
where c is the crack length from the centre of indentation to the crack tip, a is half diagonal length of indentation and l is the difference between c and a.
[0072] Shetty's facture toughness was calculated using Equations (1) and (2):
K.sub.IC=0.0889H.sup.1/2(P/4I).sup.1/2(1) [0073] where H=Vickers hardness (GPa) [0074] P=Applied force (Newton) [0075] I=Average crack length (mm)
I=(2c2a)/2(2)
[0076]
[0077] During SPS, there is considerable variation in temperature from the centre to the surface of the conducting particles (Co and Ni) when the pulse electric current is passed. The temperature at the contacting surface reaches very high values, up to several thousand degrees, and momentarily results in melting, followed by rapid solidification of the metal binder. The rapid solidification prevents the homogenous distribution of the binder phase, explaining the poor binder distribution in the SPS cermet. Similarly,
[0078] From Table 2 below and
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Densification and mechanical properties of all the samples Vickers Fracture Densification microhardness, toughness, K.sub.IC Samples (wt %) Abbreviation* (%) HV.sub.30 (GPa) (MPa .Math. m.sup.1/2) WC0.8Cr.sub.3C.sub.212Co W1-L 99.67 0.03 14.06 0.12 12.31 0.19 WC0.8Cr.sub.3C.sub.212Co W1-S 99.50 0.00 16.36 0.33 11.62 0.16 NbC12Co N1-L 98.40 0.10 11.04 0.12 7.06 0.19 NbC12Co N1-S 98.27 0.15 13.80 0.12 6.68 0.11 NbC12Ni N2-L 98.57 0.21 9.64 0.16 14.42 0.14 NbC12Ni N2-S 98.70 0.17 12.04 0.12 6.91 0.13 F1 F1-L 98.87 0.06 11.10 0.18 15.75 0.18 F1 F1-S 98.91 0.18 13.10 0.17 6.72 0.16 C1 C1-L 98.67 0.15 10.72 0.13 6.65 0.16 *S = spark plasma sintered and L = liquid phase sintered
[0079] Both SPS and LPS NbC-12Co (wt %) cermets had much lower K.sub.IC than the WC-12Co (wt %) cermets, although they had the same Co binder contents. The reduction in K.sub.IC was due to the poorer wetting of Co on NbC than on WC, and the lower solubility in Co of NbC than WC, leading to the formation of brittle interconnected NbC networks and poorer distribution of Co. Substitution of Co with Ni in the NbC based cermets significantly improved the K.sub.IC, due to the higher plasticity of Ni and its stable f.sub.cc structure. The C1-L cermet had the poorest combination of hardness and K.sub.IC because of the large NbC grains from LPS.
[0080] Next, the effect of laser shock peening (LSP) on the cermets was explored.
[0081] No change in crack propagation mode was observed before and after LSP. Transgranular crack propagation, which is the most critical fracture mode in cermets, was the main mode of fracture in all the cermets. Reduction in crack lengths after LSP without change in the crack propagation mode (
[0082] Further, no change in the microstructure of the cermets was observed after the LSP process. The grain size distribution and the distribution of the binder phase were not significantly altered by the applied LSP process.
[0083] Based on the experimental results it has been found that LSP improved the K.sub.IC of all the cermets, and maintained the microhardness as shown in
[0084] In cermets, there is an inverse relationship between hardness and K.sub.IC, so increased hardness generally results in reduced K.sub.IC. However, by following the process according to the invention, in particular the combinations of rapid sintering (SPS), composition differences (substitution of WC by NbC and Co by Ni) and surface treatment (LSP), it is possible to maintain the hardness and increase the K.sub.IC in the same cermet.
[0085] From the above description of the experimental results it should be understood that spark plasma sintering (SPS) resulted in higher hardness than conversional liquid phase sintering (LPS) for the same cermet composition. Both LPS and SPS WC-12Co (wt %) cermets had higher hardnesses than all the NbC based cermets, due to the higher hardness of WC than NbC, higher solubility of WC in Co than NbC in Co, as well as NbC in Ni. Substitution of Co by Ni in the NbC cermets increased the K.sub.IC due to the higher plasticity of Ni than Co and the former's stable f.sub.cc structure. Advantageously, Laser shock peening (LSP) increased all K.sub.IC values, irrespective of composition and sintering method. In liquid phase sintered cermets with low K.sub.IC (about 6 to 7 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2) and low microhardness (about 9 to 10 GPa), an increase of about 100% in K.sub.IC was observed. The laser shock peened SPS cermets had an increase of about 20 to 30% in K.sub.IC due to their high hardness limiting plastic deformation during LSP, while cermets with initial high K.sub.IC values (about 14 to 15 MPa.Math.m) had the least increase in K.sub.IC of about 10%.
[0086] From the above description of the method of increasing the fracture toughness of brittle materials, it should be clear that spark plasma sintering (SPS) results in the refinement of the microstructure, thereby increasing the hardness compared to similar materials produced by conventional liquid phase sintering (LPS). It has also been found that substitution of WC with NbC reduces hardness, while the substitution of Co with Ni in the NbC based cermets increases the K.sub.IC, but reduced the hardness. However, the inventors have identified a set of laser shock peening (LSP) parameters that allows LSP to be performed successfully on brittle materials, such as cemented carbides and cermets. From the abovementioned discussion of the experimental results it can be seen that LSP was successfully performed on all the cermets, which resulted in an increased K.sub.IC while maintaining the hardness. After performing LSP on liquid phase sintered cermets, which initially had low K.sub.IC values in the region of 6 to 7 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2, the K.sub.IC was doubled. The SPS cermets on the other hand have shown an increase in K.sub.IC of about 20 to 30% after LSP. The NbCNi cermets, which initially had high K.sub.IC values in the region of about 14 to 15 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2, have shown the lowest increase in K.sub.IC of about 10%. Using rapid sintering, alteration of cermet composition and in particular LPS, it was shown that it is possible to maintain the hardness and improve the fracture toughness in cermets.
[0087] It is envisaged that the above-mentioned method in accordance with the invention could be used in the manufacturing or treating of tools manufactured from brittle materials such as cemented carbides and cermets. For example, the tools could be in the form of cutting elements, cutting element inserts, drilling tools, drilling tool inserts, mining tools, wear parts in the mining and machining industries or any other tool where hardness and fracture toughness are important criteria. By carrying out the abovementioned method, in particularly the step of performing LSP on a tool which has a core made from a cemented carbide or cermet material having a fracture toughness of between about 6 and 14 MPa.Math.m.sup.1/2, a toughened surface layer, which has an increased fracture toughness compared to the fracture toughness of the core, is obtained. The increased fracture toughness of the toughened surface layer acts to increase the tool's resistance to fracturing.
Effects of LSP on WC and NbC Cermet Based Inserts for Grey Cast Iron Face-Milling
Cermet Insert Compositions and Mechanical Properties
[0088] Cutting inserts were produced by conventional liquid phase sintering (LPS) and rapid spark plasma sintering (SPS). Two inserts per composition were produced. The investigated insert compositions are shown in Table 3 below. The mechanical properties of the inserts before and after LSP are shown in Table 4. Increased fracture toughness and a maintained value of hardness was observed in all insert compositions after LSP.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Face-milling Inserts compositions Composition Production Symbol WC8Co (wt %) Liquid phase sintering WC8CoL WC8Co (wt %) Spark plasma sintering WC8CoS NbC8Ni (wt %) Spark plasma sintering NbC8NiS NbC4Mo.sub.2C8Ni Spark plasma sintering NbCMo.sub.2C8NiS (wt %)
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Mechanical Properties of Inserts before and after LSP Vickers microhardness Fracture toughness, Insert HV.sub.30 (GPa) K.sub.IC (MPa .Math. {square root over (m)}) WC8CoL 15.86 0.12 10.06 0.20 WC8CoL [LP] 15.94 0.14 10.86 0.21 WC8CoS 18.08 0.15 9.50 0.17 WC8CoS [LP] 18.14 0.23 10.45 0.19 NbC8NiS 13.47 0.12 6.52 0.22 NbC8NiS [LP] 13.35 0.15 7.64 0.18 NbCMo.sub.2C8NiS 14.06 0.11 6.49 0.10 NbCMo.sub.2C8NiS 14.17 0.19 7.35 0.12 [LP] LP* means the inserts were Laser peened
Investigated Face Milling Parameters
[0089] The produced inserts were tested under roughing, semi-finishing and finishing conditions to assess the effect of LSP during different stages of grey cast iron face-milling. The investigate parameters are shown in Table 5.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Face-milling parameters Cutting Depth Spindle Face-milling speed of cut speed Feed rate process (m/minute) (mm) (rpm) (mm/minute) Roughing 100 1.0 400 40 Semi-finishing 300 0.5 1200 120 Finishing 500 0.2 2000 200
Results
[0090]
[0091] From the grey cast iron face-milling tests it can be seen that a cutting tool treated in accordance with the method of the invention has an improved life. From the above tests it is concluded that the improved life is as a result of the increased fracture toughness and not due to an increase in microhardness resulting from a change in microstructure of the cemented carbide. The increase in life of the cutting tool is achieved despite a negligible increase in microhardness.
[0092] A significant deviation of the method of the present invention from the prior art methods is that the method of the invention focusses on fracture toughness instead of hardness. The method in accordance with the invention is not concerned with changes in the microhardness of the cemented carbide. It is believed that the increase in fracture toughness is achieved using the method of the invention, focused on the generation of compressive residual stresses, without changing the microstructure of the cemented carbide. This is in contrast to prior art methods that use high powered laser beams specifically to change the microstructure of the cemented carbide so as to increase the microhardness. This change in methodology away from a focus on hardness improvement has resulted in the method in accordance with the invention selecting a cemented carbide based on its fracture toughness.
[0093] It will be appreciated that the above is only some exemplified embodiments of the invention and that there may be many variations without departing from the spirit and/or the scope of the invention. It is easily understood from the present application that the particular features of the present invention, as generally described and/or illustrated in the figures, can be arranged and designed according to a wide variety of different configurations. In this way, the description of the present invention and the related figures are not provided to limit the scope of the invention but simply represent selected embodiments.
[0094] The skilled person will understand that the technical characteristics of a given embodiment can in fact be combined with characteristics of another embodiment, unless otherwise expressed or it is evident that these characteristics are incompatible. Also, the technical characteristics described in a given embodiment can be isolated from the other characteristics of this embodiment unless otherwise expressed.