SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PROVIDING A BAROMETRIC ALTITUDE MONITOR
20200103228 ยท 2020-04-02
Inventors
Cpc classification
G01W1/02
PHYSICS
G01S1/18
PHYSICS
G01S19/20
PHYSICS
G01C23/00
PHYSICS
International classification
G01W1/02
PHYSICS
G01C5/00
PHYSICS
G01S19/20
PHYSICS
B64D45/04
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
G01S1/18
PHYSICS
Abstract
There are provided systems and methods for providing a barometric altitude monitor that assist pilots by providing alerts when a barometric altitude of the ownship aircraft is may be incorrect. Various embodiments of the present invention determine whether significant errors in barometric altitude occur though comparisons to alternate altitude information sources. Through aspects of the present invention, errors arising from manual entry of barometric pressure information by a pilot may be identified before safety issues arise, thus helping to prevent events such as controlled flight into terrain (CFIT).
Claims
1. A method comprising: determining that a barometric altimeter in an ownship aircraft is configured in a mode other than standard (STD) mode; comparing a corrected altitude measurement from the barometric altimeter to a second source of altitude information; and generating an alert if the compared corrected altitude measurement deviates from the second source of altitude information by a predetermined altitude error threshold.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source of information comprises a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft.
3. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source of information comprises a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source of information comprises altitude measurements received from a transmission from a second aircraft in proximity to the ownship aircraft.
5. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source of information comprises an average of: a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft; and a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
6. The method of claim 1 wherein the second source of information comprises a weighted average of: a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft; and a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
7. The method of claim 1 wherein the predetermined altitude error threshold is selected from a range of plus or minus 0.5% to plus or minus 10% of the corrected altitude measurement.
8. The method of claim 7 wherein the selected altitude error threshold represents the expected error between the barometric altitude source and second source to a 99.999% level of certainty.
9. The method of claim 1 further comprising detecting that an altimeter of the ownship aircraft is configured in Standard (STD) setting; and generating an alert if a radio altitude measurement of the ownship aircraft is less than a predetermined minimum radio altitude threshold.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the predetermined minimum radio altitude threshold is within a range of 500 feet to 4500 feet.
11. The method of claim 1 further comprising cancelling the alert if the corrected altitude measurement no longer deviates from the second source of altitude information by a predetermined altitude error threshold.
12. The method of claim 9 further comprising cancelling the alert if the radio altitude measurement of the ownship aircraft is greater than or equal to the predetermined minimum radio altitude threshold.
13. A method comprising: determining that a radio altitude measurement of the ownship aircraft is less than a predetermined minimum radio altitude threshold; comparing a corrected altitude measurement from the barometric altimeter to a second source of altitude information; and generating an alert if the compared corrected altitude measurement deviates from the second source of altitude information by a predetermined altitude error threshold.
14. The method of claim 13 wherein the second source of information comprises a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft.
15. The method of claim 13 wherein the second source of information comprises a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
16. The method of claim 13 wherein the second source of information comprises altitude measurements received from a transmission from a second aircraft in proximity to the ownship aircraft.
17. The method of claim 13 wherein the second source of information comprises an average of: a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft; and a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
18. The method of claim 13 wherein the second source of information comprises an average of: a GPS-determined altitude of the ownship aircraft; and a sum of a radio altitude of the ownship aircraft and a terrain elevation proximate to the ownship aircraft.
19. The method of claim 13 wherein the predetermined minimum radio altitude threshold is within a range of 500 feet to 4500 feet.
20. The method of claim 13 wherein the predetermined altitude error threshold is selected from a range of plus or minus 0.5% to plus or minus 10% of the corrected altitude measurement.
21. The method of claim 20 wherein the selected altitude error threshold represents the expected error between the barometric altitude source and second source to a 99.999% level of certainty.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0011] A more complete understanding of the present invention may be derived by referring to the detailed description and claims when considered in connection with the following illustrative figures.
[0012]
[0013]
[0014]
[0015]
[0016]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0017] Referring to
[0018] Embodiments of the present invention may monitor the barometric mode setting from the aircraft, and as such,
[0019] In various embodiments, an altitude error threshold may be a statistically derived threshold. Such a threshold would be dynamic and depend on multiple factors. For example, in one scenario, if it is known that statistically speaking, the real atmosphere varies from an idealized atmospheric model by an amount that depends on altitude and air temperature, aspects of the invention can quantify how much error in the barometric altitude is reasonable/probable given the known model and the actual atmospheric variations. Further, if an altitude calculated based on the ambient pressure and assuming an idealized atmosphere is on average correct, and may have a standard variation (or in some embodiments, standard deviation) such that the calculation is may provide a range of 6 feet per 100 feet of altitude. Thus, a one sigma error due to altitude would be 6 feet per 100 feet. Further, in various embodiments, to estimate how large of an error could be expected at the 95th percentile, embodiments could calculate 1.96 times the sigma error (i.e., 1.96 sigma equates to 95% when there is normal or Gaussian distribution). Similarly, embodiments could calculate a 99.9% expected error as 3.3 times sigma or a 99.999% expected error as 4.4 times sigma.
[0020] In addition to the expected error that is a function of altitude, for various embodiments, there may be an altitude error threshold that is a function of temperature. In this embodiment, the further the atmospheric temperature at a given attitude is from standard, the larger the altitude error might be. For example, in one aspect, for every degree Celsius of temperature deviation from standard temperature, the standard deviation of altitude error is 10 feet. Thus, when the atmospheric temperature is 10 deg C warmer than standard, the temperature-based sigma would be 100 feet. Here again aspects of the present invention could calculate a 4.4 sigma value to determine the altitude error that could be expected at the 99.999 percentile.
[0021] In additional embodiments, other error sources could similarly be characterized. Additional error sources include not only error sources in the barometric altitude, but errors in the truth source, such as GPS. For instance, VFOM gives a 95% (1.96 sigma) vertical error estimate for GPS. Thus, embodiments could calculate a 4.4 sigma error for GPS based on that estimate.
[0022] Additionally, an overall expected error could then be calculated by root-sum-squaring the various errors. The resulting value would be the threshold that could be used to trigger an alert. For instance, if the difference between the barometric altitude and the GPS altitude is 150 feet and the 99.999% expected error is 149 feet, the system could determine, with 99.999% confidence, that the difference between the barometric altitude and the GPS altitude was due to something other than reasonably expected inaccuracies in the barometric and GPS altitudes; this would be the point when an alert would be generated.
[0023]
[0024]
[0025]
[0026] The particular implementations shown and described above are illustrative of the invention and its best mode and are not intended to otherwise limit the scope of the present invention in any way. Indeed, for the sake of brevity, conventional data storage, data transmission, and other functional aspects of the systems may not be described in detail. Methods illustrated in the various figures may include more, fewer, or other steps. Additionally, steps may be performed in any suitable order without departing from the scope of the invention. Furthermore, the connecting lines shown in the various figures are intended to represent exemplary functional relationships and/or physical couplings between the various elements. Many alternative or additional functional relationships or physical connections may be present in a practical system.
[0027] Changes and modifications may be made to the disclosed embodiments without departing from the scope of the present invention. These and other changes or modifications are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention, as expressed in the following claims.