Method of producing hot-stamped article
10604849 ยท 2020-03-31
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
C23G5/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B21D22/022
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C23C22/68
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B23K26/361
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K26/40
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
International classification
B08B7/00
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
C23G5/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C22/68
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C23C2/28
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
B21D22/02
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
B23K26/361
PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
Abstract
A method of producing a hot-stamped article includes: a forming process of heating a galvanized steel sheet (1) on which a galvanized layer (12) is formed and forming the heated galvanized steel sheet (1) by hot stamping; a removal process of irradiating, after the forming step, an oxide film (13) formed on a surface of the galvanized layer (12) with laser light to remove the oxide film (13); and a coating process of performing, after the removal process, a coating treatment on the galvanized steel sheet (1) formed by hot stamping.
Claims
1. A method of producing a hot-stamped article, comprising: a forming process of heating a galvanized steel sheet on which a galvanized layer is formed and forming the heated galvanized steel sheet by hot stamping; a removal process of irradiating, after the forming process, an oxide film formed on a surface of the galvanized layer with laser light to remove the oxide film; and a coating process of performing, after the removal process, a coating treatment on the galvanized steel sheet formed by hot stamping, wherein the laser light is irradiated at a power from 210 to 350 MW/cm.sup.2.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein in the coating process, a phosphate chemical conversion treatment is performed on the surface of the galvanized layer from which the oxide film is removed, and a coating film is formed on the surface on which the phosphate chemical conversion treatment is performed.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Features, advantages, and technical and industrial significance of exemplary embodiments of the invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which like numerals denote like elements, and wherein:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
(18)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS
(19) Hereinafter, the invention will be described based on an embodiment with reference to the drawings.
(20)
(21) As illustrated in Process a of
(22) As illustrated in Process b of
(23) Next, as illustrated in Process d of
(24) At this time, as illustrated in
(25) Therefore, as illustrated in Process e of
(26) Accordingly, the oxide film 13, which is formed on the surface of the galvanized layer 12 when the galvanized steel sheet 1 is formed by hot stamping, is sublimated (evaporated) by laser light. Therefore, the oxide film 13 can be more efficiently removed from the surface of the galvanized steel sheet 1.
(27) In this way, as illustrated in
(28) Here, as clearly seen from Examples described below by the present inventors, when the oxide film is removed by mechanical means such as shot blasting or polishing, the oxide film may be crushed and a part of the oxide film including the gaps may remain in the steel sheet. Further, when the oxide film is removed by chemical means such as etching using an etching solution, it is difficult to efficiently remove only the oxide film. In particular, since fine convex portions on the surface of the galvanized steel sheet are preferentially removed, it is difficult to uniformly remove the oxide film.
(29) However, according to the embodiment, the oxide film 13 is evaporated (sublimated) by irradiation of the laser light 5 and thus can be uniformly removed without being crushed unlike the oxide film removal by the mechanical means and the chemical means. In addition, since the oxide film 13 is removed by the laser light 5, the surface of a base material 11 of the galvanized steel sheet 1 is rapidly heated and cooled. Accordingly, an effect of the laser light 5 on the base material of the galvanized steel sheet 1 can be minimized. Further, the effect of the laser light 5 on the base material can be reduced by appropriately controlling the power of the laser light 5.
(30) Next, as illustrated in Process f of
(31) When the hot-stamped article is produced using the above-described method, the oxide film 13 is irradiated with the laser light 5 to remove the oxide film 13. Therefore, the deposition amount of phosphate crystals, which constitute the phosphate chemical conversion film 14, on the galvanized layer can be increased.
(32) In addition, since the gaps C are not present in the galvanized steel sheet 1, the coating film 15 (specifically, the phosphate chemical conversion film 14) and the galvanized layer 12 come into close contact with each other. Accordingly, water or the like containing a salt content does not infiltrate into the gaps C, and corrosion is not developed.
(33) In addition, by removing elements of the oxide film which cause electrical non-uniformity, the steel sheet is electrically stable, and corrosion resistance can be improved. Further, as compared to a case where the oxide film 13 is formed, the deposition amount of phosphate crystals constituting the phosphate chemical conversion film 14 can be increased, and the adhesion of the coating film 15 can be improved.
Example 1
(34) <Hot Stamping>
(35) As a galvanized steel sheet; a steel sheet (coating weight: 50 g/m.sup.2) on which a galvannealed coating was formed on a surface of 22MnB5 steel was prepared. Here, a solution obtained in a coating weight measuring test according to JIS H 401 was analyzed by ICP, and the weight of Zn was measured. As a result, it was found that the weight of Zn was 30 g/m.sup.2. This galvanized steel sheet was held at a heating temperature of 900 C. for 10 seconds and was quenched at a forming and quenching temperature of 700 C. or lower (specifically, a die temperature of 20 C.).
(36) <Removal of Oxide Film>
(37)
(38)
(39) At a measurement position illustrated in
(40) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 C O F Al Si Cl Cr Mn Fe Zn Before Removal 6.4 14.7 0.3 1.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 5.3 9.3 62.4 (mass %) After Removal 5.8 2.8 0.4 26.3 64.8 (mass %)
(41) As clearly seen from the above results, it was found that the oxygen content was decreased from 15 mass % to about 3 mass % by irradiation of laser light.
(42)
(43)
(44) <Phosphate Chemical Conversion Treatment>
(45) A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on the surface of the galvanized layer of the galvanized steel sheet from which the oxide film was removed, and then the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured. The coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured by X-ray fluorescence spectrometry according to JIS K 0119. The results are shown in Table 2.
(46) <Formation of Coating Film and Peeling Test>
(47) Cationic electrodeposition coating (target thickness: 10 m) was performed on the obtained galvanized steel sheet on which the phosphate chemical conversion film was formed, thereby preparing a specimen. Using a salt water immersion test machine, the galvanized steel sheet was dipped in warm water having a salt concentration of 0.1% or higher and a temperature of 40 C. or higher for 200 hours or longer, and the adhesion of the coating film was evaluated using an adhesive tape. The results are shown in Table 2. Here, a peeling area ratio shown in Table 2 is obtained by dividing the area of a peeled part of the coating film by the area of the specimen.
(48) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Laser Peeling Heating Removal Light Coating Area Conditions Means Conditions Weight Ratio Example 1 Heating Laser Light 350 MW/cm.sup.2 2.44 g/cm.sup.2 4.6% Example 2 Temperature Laser Light 280 MW/cm.sup.2 2.40 g/cm.sup.2 13.1% Example 3 900 C. Laser Light 210 MW/cm.sup.2 2.68 g/cm.sup.2 42.7% Comparative Holding Time None 2.12 g/cm.sup.2 54.7% Example 1 10 Seconds Comparative Blasting 2.55 g/cm.sup.2 48.3% Example 2 Comparative Reinforced 2.24 g/cm.sup.2 56.1% Example 3 Alkali Comparative Polishing 2.24 g/cm.sup.2 45.0% Example 4 Reference None None 2.48 g/cm.sup.2 13.2% Example
Examples 2 and 3
(49) Galvanized steel sheets corresponding to hot-stamped articles were prepared with the same method as Example 1. A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of each of the galvanized steel sheets, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. Examples 2 and 3 were different from Example 1, in that the irradiation intensity of laser light was changed as shown in Table 2. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Comparative Example 1
(50) A galvanized steel sheet corresponding to a hot-stamped article was prepared with the same method as Example 1. A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of the galvanized steel sheet, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. Comparative Example 1 was different from Example 1, in that an oxide film was not removed by laser light. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Comparative Example 2
(51) A galvanized steel sheet corresponding to a hot-stamped article was prepared with the same method as Example 1. A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of the galvanized steel sheet, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. Comparative Example 2 was different from Example 1, in that the oxide film was removed not by laser light but by dry ice shot blasting. Specifically, the oxide film was removed under conditions of an air pressure of 0.6 MPa, a processing speed of 10 mm/sec, a dry ice pellet consumption rate of 1 kg/min, and a pellet size of 3 mm. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Comparative Example 3
(52) A galvanized steel sheet corresponding to a hot-stamped article was prepared with the same method as Example 1. A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of the galvanized steel sheet, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. Comparative Example 3 was different from Example 1, in that the oxide film was removed not by laser light but by reinforced alkali. Specifically, the galvanized steel sheet was dipped in an aqueous NaOH solution having a concentration of 2% and a temperature of 50 C. for 30 minutes to remove the oxide film. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Comparative Example 4
(53) A galvanized steel sheet corresponding to a hot-stamped article was prepared with the same method as Example 1. A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of the galvanized steel sheet, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. Comparative Example 4 was different from Example 1, in that the oxide film was removed not by laser light but by an abrasive. Specifically, the oxide film was removed by using Scotch Bright #300 (manufactured by 3M) as an abrasive under a condition of a polishing time of 5 seconds. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Reference Example
(54) A phosphate chemical conversion treatment was performed on a surface of a galvanized steel sheet which was not heated, and a coating film was formed thereon, thereby preparing a specimen. The peeling test was performed using the coating film of the specimen. That is, in Reference Example, since the galvanized steel sheet was not heated, an oxide film was not formed on the surface of the galvanized layer. With the same method as Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was measured before coating, and the peeling area thereof was measured after coating. The results are shown in Table 2.
Results and Discussions
(55) As shown in Table 2, when the oxide film was removed by laser light as in the case of Examples 1 to 3, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was the same as that of Reference Example in which a heat treatment was not performed. In addition, the peeling area ratios of the galvanized steel sheets according to Examples 1 to 3 were lower than those according to Comparative Examples 1 to 4. Therefore, it can be said that the adhesion of the coating films of the galvanized steel sheets according to Examples 1 to 3 were higher than those according to Comparative Examples 1 to 4.
(56) When the oxide film was not removed as in the case of Comparative Example 1, the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film was less than those of Examples 1 to 3. The reason is considered to be that the formation of the phosphate chemical conversion film was inhibited by the oxide film. Further, in Comparative Example 1 (
(57) In addition, in the galvanized steel sheet according to Comparative Example 2, the oxide film was removed by the dry ice pellet, and thus the coating weight of the phosphate chemical conversion film increased. However, the oxide film was crushed, and a part of the oxide film and the gaps remained in the galvanized steel sheet (refer to
(58) In addition, in the galvanized steel sheet according to Comparative Example 3 (
(59) In addition, in the galvanized steel sheet according to Comparative Example 4, the oxide film was removed by physical polishing. In this case, a part of the oxide film remained in the galvanized steel sheet in a state of being crushed. Accordingly, it is considered that a part of the oxide film and the gaps remained in the galvanized steel sheet, and thus the peeling area ratio was higher than those of Examples 1 to 3.
(60) Hereinabove, the embodiment of the invention has been described. However, the invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and various design modifications can be made.