Wet flue gas desulfurization process and apparatus

Abstract

Systems, apparatuses, and processes for controlling free ammonia in wet flue gas desulfurization processes in which an ammonia-containing scrubbing solution is used to produce ammonium sulfate. Such an apparatus includes an absorber having a contactor region through which a flue gas comprising sulfur dioxide is able to flow and a reaction tank containing a scrubbing solution containing ammonium sulfate. The tank has a sidewall and bottom wall that define the perimeter and bottom of the tank. Lance-agitator units are distributed around the perimeter of the tank, each having a lance that injects a mixture of oxygen and a dilute ammonia-containing fluid toward the bottom of the tank and an agitator that agitates the mixture and propels the mixture toward the bottom of the tank. The apparatus includes a source of the mixture of oxygen and dilute ammonia-containing fluid, and recirculates the scrubbing solution from the tank to the contactor region.

Claims

1. An apparatus for removing sulfur dioxide from a flue gas using an ammonia-based scrubbing solution, the apparatus comprising: an absorber having a contactor region through which a flue gas comprising sulfur dioxide is able to flow and a reaction tank containing the scrubbing solution comprising ammonium sulfate, the tank having a side wall that defines a perimeter of the tank and a bottom wall that defines a bottom of the tank; a plurality of lance-agitator units distributed around the perimeter of the tank, each of the lance-agitator units comprising a lance that injects a mixture of oxygen and a dilute ammonia-containing fluid through outlets located about 1.2 to about 2.4 meters from the bottom of the tank and injects the mixture toward the bottom of the tank to convert ammonium sulfite to ammonium sulfate, each of the lance-agitator units further comprising an agitator that agitates the mixture and propels the mixture toward the bottom of the tank to reduce ammonia slip from the scrubbing solution in the tank; a source of the mixture of oxygen and dilute ammonia-containing fluid; and means for recirculating the scrubbing solution from the tank to the contactor region to remove sulfur dioxide from the flue gas.

2. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the source of the oxygen in the mixture is air.

3. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the dilute ammonia-containing fluid of the mixture is an aqueous ammonia solution or a solution containing anhydrous ammonia.

4. A process for removing sulfur dioxide from a flue gas using the apparatus according to claim 1, the method comprising the steps of: delivering the flue gas to the contactor region of the absorber; contacting the flue gas within the contactor region with the scrubbing solution that contains the ammonium sulfate to absorb sulfur dioxide from the flue gas; accumulating the scrubbing solution containing the absorbed sulfur dioxide in the tank; utilizing the plurality of lance-agitator units distributed around the perimeter of the tank to introduce the mixture of oxygen and the dilute ammonia-containing fluid into the tank to react with the sulfur dioxide to produce ammonium sulfate, wherein the lance of each of the lance-agitator units injects the mixture toward the bottom of the tank and the agitator agitates the mixture and propels the mixture toward the bottom of the tank; and recirculating the scrubbing solution from the tank to the contactor region.

5. The process according to claim 4, wherein the source of the oxygen in the mixture is air.

6. The process according to claim 4, wherein the dilute ammonia-containing fluid of the mixture is an aqueous ammonia solution or a solution containing anhydrous ammonia.

7. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the lance-agitator units are equi-angularly distributed around the perimeter defined by the sidewall of the tank.

8. The apparatus according to claim 1, wherein the agitators are arranged to agitate the mixture between the outlets of the lances and the bottom of the tank.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of an apparatus for a flue gas desulfurization process, and

(2) FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the apparatus of FIG. 1 along section line 2-2.

(3) FIG. 3 is a schematic representation of an apparatus for a flue gas desulfurization process in accordance with a nonlimiting aspect of the present invention, and

(4) FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the apparatus of FIG. 3 along section line 4-4.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(5) The invention relates to flue gas desulfurization processes and apparatuses suitable for removing sulfur dioxide gas entrained in flue gases to generate ammonium sulfate as a byproduct. While the invention will be described in reference to a desulfurization system that utilizes an absorber, those skilled in the art will recognize that the teachings of this invention can be readily applied to various other desulfurization systems, and the desulfurization process is compatible with various systems capable of removing other undesirable gases, mist, dust, fumes, smoke and/or particulate matter from a stream of gas.

(6) FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a flue gas scrubbing apparatus 110 in accordance with a nonlimiting embodiment of the invention. As shown, the apparatus 110 includes an upright absorber 112 that is supplied with a flue gas through an inlet duct 114. The apparatus 110 operates in a manner that causes absorption of sulfur dioxide from the flue gas through the use of a scrubbing solution 122. The scrubbed flue gas exits the absorber 112 through an outlet duct 120 and from there may be delivered to a stack (not shown) or other suitable equipment. The source of the flue gas may be any process involving the combustion of fossil fuels or various industrial operations by which undesirable gases or particulate matter are produced.

(7) The scrubbing solution 122 is an ammonia-rich scrubbing solution, and in particular a scrubbing solution containing free dissolved ammonia as the reagent for the desulfurization process. The dissolved ammonia can be either aqueous ammonia (ammonium hydroxide) or anhydrous ammonia (NH.sub.3), depending on the composition of the scrubbing solution. As nonlimiting examples, the solution may contain ammonia diluted with air and/or water, with the latter resulting in the presence of aqueous ammonia. FIG. 3 shows ammonia being delivered from a source 132 to a reaction tank 118 via a pump 126 and an injection system 130. The ammonia, which may be present in an aqueous solution or other suitable solution as noted above, is a primary reactant when producing ammonium sulfate as a byproduct of the desulfurization process, and the scrubbing solution 122 serves as the vehicle for delivering the ammonia to the absorber 112.

(8) Similar to the apparatus 10 of FIG. 1, one or more recirculation pumps 140 (FIG. 4) may be used to recycle the scrubbing solution 122 from the tank 118 through a conduit 116 to a contactor region of the absorber 112, where the solution 122 is introduced through a number of nozzles 124 or other suitable devices. The scrubbing process involves spraying the scrubbing solution 122 into the absorber 112 so as to provide intimate contact between the solution 122 and the flue gas. As a result, the solution 122 absorbs sulfur dioxide and potentially other acid gases, such as hydrogen chloride and hydrogen fluoride, if present in the flue gas. The solution 122 then falls into the reaction tank 118, where the absorbed sulfur dioxide reacts with the ammonia to form ammonium sulfite and ammonium bisulfite, which are then oxidized in the presence of sufficient oxygen to form ammonium sulfate and ammonium bisulfate, the latter of which reacts with ammonia to form additional ammonium sulfate. A portion of the scrubbing solution 122 and/or ammonium sulfate crystals that form in the solution 122 may be drawn off to yield a desired fertilizer byproduct of this reaction. A sufficient amount of ammonium sulfate is preferably removed from the scrubbing solution 122 prior to delivery to the absorber 112 in order to maintain ammonium sulfate at a desired concentration in the solution 122, as a nonlimiting example, about 2% up to the saturation level of ammonium sulfate in the solution 122.

(9) Sufficient ammonia is preferably delivered to the tank 118 to control the pH of the scrubbing solution 122, for example, within a typical range of about 4 to 6 pH range, such that the solution 122 is highly reactive for high efficient capture of sulfur oxide gases. The manner in which the ammonia is injected into the solution 122 can undesirably promote high levels of ammonia slip, such that free ammonia and potentially an ammonium sulfate aerosol escapes the absorber 112 and is discharged into the atmosphere. Whereas U.S. Pat. No. 6,187,278 seeks to reduce ammonia slip by injecting dilute ammonia into a scrubbing solution with an injection system that comprises multiple spargers that extend in parallel across the entire diameter of the reaction tank (FIGS. 1 and 2), a substantial test program leading up to the present invention indicated that combinations of lances and agitators selectively located around the perimeter of a reaction tank are capable of having a comparable effect with respect to oxygen transfer and uniformly dispersing a dilute mixture of ammonia and oxygen in the reaction tank.

(10) The ammonia injected from the source 132 in the reaction tank 118 is preferably in the form of a dilute solution, for example, an aqueous solution. FIGS. 3 and 4 represent the diluted ammonia solution as being further diluted with oxygen from a suitable source 138 prior to being injected into the tank 118 via lances 134 of the injection system 130. Air is a suitable source for the oxygen, with a preferred ammonia:air weight ratio being about 1 to about 5. As seen in FIG. 3, each lance 134 is paired with an agitator 142 that operates in combination with its associated lance 134 to uniformly disperse the injected mixture of oxygen and dilute ammonia toward the bottom 136 of the reaction tank 118. Each lance 134 is represented in FIG. 3 as comprising a pipe that extends through a sidewall of the tank 118, has a section that projects vertically downward toward the tank bottom 136, and terminates with an outlet 148 facing the tank bottom 136. Each agitator 142 is represented in FIG. 3 as comprising a propeller or fan mounted on a shaft that extends through the tank sidewall at a negative angle to horizontal and is driven by a motor. Each lance 134 injects the ammonia toward the bottom 136 of the tank 118, and its paired agitator 142 assists to propel and disperse the injected ammonia at the tank bottom 136. The negative angle of the shaft is preferably sufficient to promote the downward flow of the injected oxygen-ammonia mixture toward the tank bottom 136, with suitable angles believed to be at least eight to about twelve degrees from horizontal.

(11) FIG. 4 represents the tank 118 as equipped with four lance/agitator units 144, each having a single lance 134 paired with a single agitator 142. As represented in FIG. 4, the units 144 are generally equi-angularly distributed around the interior perimeter 146 defined by the sidewall of the tank 118. Based on a reaction tank 118 having a depth of about 48 feet (about 14 meters), the outlet 148 of each lance 134 is preferably located about 4 to about 8 feet (about 1.2 to about 2.4 meters) from the bottom 136 of the tank 118, and agitation caused by each agitator 142 preferably occurs between the lance outlet 148 and the tank bottom 136. This arrangement has been shown to achieve acceptable results in terms of delivering sufficient ammonia and oxygen while simultaneously avoiding ammonia slip. The ammonia and oxygen mixture introduced with the injection system 130 is forcibly circulated through the reaction tank 118 by the agitators 142, as opposed to relying on natural circulation cause by the solution 122 being recirculated from the tank 118 to the absorber 112.

(12) A significant advantage of the present invention is the ability to use lances instead of more expensive spargers to reduce ammonia slip in a desulfurization process that uses an ammonia-based scrubbing solution. Other advantages include minimal pluggage potential, fewer penetrations, and fewer obstructions in the reaction tank.

(13) While the invention has been described in terms of a specific or particular embodiment, it should be apparent that alternatives could be adopted by one skilled in the art. For example, the flue gas scrubbing apparatus 110 and its components could differ in appearance and construction from the embodiment described herein and shown in the drawings, functions of certain components of the apparatus 110 could be performed by components of different construction but capable of a similar (though not necessarily equivalent) function, various process parameters could be employed, and various materials could be used in the fabrication of the apparatus 110 and/or its components. In addition, the invention encompasses additional or alternative embodiments in which one or more features or aspects of the disclosed embodiment could be eliminated. Accordingly, it should be understood that the invention is not necessarily limited to any embodiment described herein or illustrated in the drawings. It should also be understood that the phraseology and terminology employed above are for the purpose of describing the illustrated embodiment, and do not necessarily serve as limitations to the scope of the invention. Therefore, the scope of the invention is to be limited only by the following claims.