GLASSES AND GLASS-CERAMICS AND METHODS OF MAKING THEM
20230022287 · 2023-01-26
Inventors
Cpc classification
C03C10/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C03B19/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C03B32/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
A01P1/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
International classification
A01P1/00
HUMAN NECESSITIES
C03B19/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C03C10/00
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
A glass includes from 42 mol % to 47 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, from 42 mol % to 48 mol % CuO, and from greater than 0 mol % to 15 mol % Fe.sub.2O.sub.3. The glass is an amorphous, single-phase glass. Methods of making a glass article include heating batch materials to a melting temperature from 900° C. to 1350° C. In aspects, methods include pouring the molten glass in an inert gaseous environment, and cooling the molten glass in the inter gaseous environment. In aspects, methods include cooling the molten glass to form the glass article and annealing the glass article without growing crystals in or on the glass article during the cooling or the annealing.
Claims
1. A method of manufacturing a glass article, comprising: heating batch materials to a melting temperature to form a molten glass, wherein the melting temperature is in a range from 900° C. to 1350° C., wherein the batch materials comprise >30 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, >30 mol % CuO, and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3; pouring the molten glass in an inert gaseous environment; and cooling the molten glass in the inert gaseous environment for form the glass article.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the batch materials comprise, in terms of as-batched constituents: 42 mol %≤P.sub.2O.sub.5≤47 mol %; 42 mol %≤CuO≤48 mol %; and 7 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %.
3. The method of claim 1, further comprising preheating a mold or surface to a temperature in a range from 200° C. to 300° C., before the pouring the molten glass, and pouring the molten glass into the mold or onto the surface.
4. The method of claim 1, further comprising heating the batch materials to a temperature in a range from 250° C. to 300° C. for at least 12 hours before heating the batch materials to the melting temperature.
5. The method of claim 1, further comprising heating the batch materials to 850° C. for at least one hour before heating the batch materials to the melting temperature.
6. A method of manufacturing a glass article, comprising: heating batch materials to a melting temperature of the batch materials to form a molten glass, wherein the batch materials in terms of as-batched constituents comprise 42 mol %≤P.sub.2O.sub.5≤47 mol %, 42 mol %≤CuO≤48 mol %, and 7 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %, and wherein the melting temperature is in a range from 900° C. to 1350° C.; cooling the molten glass to form the glass article without growing crystals in or on the glass article during the cooling; and annealing the glass article without growing crystals in or on the glass article.
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the annealing occurs after the glass article reaches 25° C.
8. The method of claim 6, further comprising: heating the batch materials to a first temperature less than the melting temperature and maintaining the first temperature for at least an hour; and heating the batch materials to a second temperature higher than the first temperature and less than the melting temperature and maintaining the second temperature for at least an hour.
9. The method of claim 8, wherein the first temperature is at least 200° C. and the second temperature is at least 650° C.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein the batch materials are maintained at the first temperature for at least 12.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein the batch materials are maintained at the melting temperature for at least 30 minutes.
12. A glass, in terms of as-analyzed constituent components, comprising: 42 mol %≤P.sub.2O.sub.5≤47 mol %; 42 mol %≤CuO≤48 mol %; and 0≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤15 mol %, wherein the glass is an amorphous, single-phase glass.
13. The glass of claim 12, wherein SiO.sub.2≤5 mol %.
14. The glass of claim 12, wherein the glass has a greater amount of Cu.sup.+ ions than Cu.sup.2+ ions.
15. The glass of claim 12, wherein 7 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %.
16. The glass of claim 15, wherein 7.5 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %, and 42 mol %≤CuO≤47.5 mol %.
17. The glass of claim 16, wherein 8 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %, and 42 mol %≤CuO≤47 mol %.
18. The glass of claim 12, wherein the glass has a CIELAB L* value less than 35, a CIELAB a* value from −5 to 5, and a CIELAB b* value from −5 to 5.
19. The glass of claim 12, wherein the glass exhibits a positive percent kill as measured by United States EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as a Sanitizer.
20. The glass of claim 19, wherein P.sub.2O.sub.5, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and CuO constituents in combination with one another make up over 90 mol % of the phosphate glass.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES
[0041] The accompanying Figures are included to provide a further understanding and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification. The drawings illustrate one or more aspects of the innovation, and together with the Detailed Description explain principles and operations of the innovation. As such, the disclosure will become more fully understood from the following Detailed Description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Figures, in which:
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
[0047]
[0048]
[0049]
[0050]
[0051]
[0052]
[0053]
[0054]
[0055]
[0056]
[0057]
[0058]
[0059]
[0060]
[0061]
[0062]
[0063]
[0064]
[0065]
[0066]
[0067]
[0068]
[0069]
[0070]
[0071]
[0072]
[0073]
[0074]
[0075]
[0076]
[0077]
[0078]
[0079]
[0080]
[0081]
[0082]
[0083]
[0084]
[0085]
[0086]
[0087]
[0088]
[0089]
[0090]
[0091]
[0092]
[0093]
[0094]
[0095]
[0096]
[0097]
[0098]
[0099]
[0100]
[0101]
[0102]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0103] Before turning to the following Detailed Description and Figures, which illustrate aspects in detail, it should be understood that the present inventive technology is not limited to the details or methodology set forth in the Detailed Description or illustrated in the Figures. For example, as will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art, features and attributes associated with embodiments shown in one of the Figures or described in the text relating to one of the embodiments may well be applied to other embodiments shown in another of the Figures or described elsewhere in the text.
[0104] Referring to
[0105] More specifically, according to an exemplary aspect the materials are or include phosphate glasses, where constituents in percentage of total moles (mol %) include at least 10 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, such as at least 15 mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 25 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as at least 30 mol %, such as at least 35 mol %, and/or no more than 75 mol %, such as no more than 63 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 50 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5 such as for improved antimicrobial properties. In embodiments, phosphorus is present in the material as identified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown in
[0106] For clarity, mol % ranges herein refer to mol % as batch constituents, as analyzed such as by inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy, and as analyzed with silica normalized out (see Table 1 below for example) unless specified otherwise, but the mol % ranges claimed herein by default are as analyzed unless otherwise specified. Also all ranges disclosed herein as closed sets (e.g., at least X, no more than Y) also include and may be rewritten as open sets (e.g., more than X, less than Y), where boundary values are excluded in the range, or mixed sets where either boundary value is or is not included in the range.
[0107] According to an exemplary aspect, constituents in percentage of total moles (mol %) include at least some Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, such as at least more than trace amounts, such as at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 2.5 mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 5 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, and/or no more than 50 mol %, such as no more than 38 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 25 mol % Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as no more than 15 mol %, such as no more than 13 mol %, such as no more than 10 mol %. In embodiments, iron is optionally present in the material as identified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown in
[0108] According to an exemplary aspect, constituents in percentage of total moles (mol %) include at least 15 mol % CuO, such as at least 25 mol %, at least 30 mol %, at least 33 mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 40 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, and/or no more than 88 mol %, such as no more than 80 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 75 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as no more than 70 mol %, such as no more than 60 mol %, such as no more than 55 mol %. In embodiments, copper is present in the material as identified by x-ray diffraction, such as is shown in
[0109] According to an exemplary aspect, materials are or are mostly ternary in that the P.sub.2O.sub.5, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and CuO constituents in combination with one another make up the majority of the mixture (e.g., batch mixture, or as analyzed), such as more than 50 mol %, such as at least 75 mol %, at least 85%, at least 90%, but in embodiments the P.sub.2O.sub.5, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and CuO constituents in combination may optionally comprise less than 50 mol % and/or up to 100 mol %.
[0110] In embodiments, the materials are antimicrobial, where the material, or a surface of the material will kill or inhibit growth of microbes including bacteria, viruses, and/or fungi, but not necessarily that the material or the surface of the material will kill or inhibit the growth of all species microbes within such families (e.g., Staphylococcus aureus, Enterobacter aerogenes, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa), but that it will kill or inhibit the growth or one or more species of microbes from such families. Further, the data in
[0111] Embodiments of materials, glass, glass-ceramics, and products disclosed herein exhibit a kill rate of greater than 0, such as 25% or more, such as 50% or more, such as 75% or more, such as at least 99.9% (or a log reduction of 3 or greater) within 2 hours of exposure to Staphylococcus aureus under U.S. EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy as a Sanitizer testing conditions (see https://archive.epa.gov/pesticides/oppad001/web/pdf/copper-copper-alloy-surface-protocol.pdf, incorporated by reference) as implemented below.
[0112] Bactericidal efficacy tests including study controls were performed as described in the EPA test for efficacy of copper alloy surfaces as a sanitizer. The test material (e.g. glass) coupons were prepared as 25 mm×25 mm×1 mm coupons with polished surfaces. A 7 mil (0.007 inch, 0.1778 mm) wet film thickness drawdown bar was used to form films onto Leneta Scrub Charts (P121-10N). The films were dried for 2 days at ambient lab temperature (approximately 25° C.) before the antimicrobial test was conducted. Dry film thickness was around 80 μm. Stainless steel carriers, used as reference, were cleaned and sterilized by immersion in a 75% ethanol solution followed by rinsing with deionized water. Vials containing Staphylococcus aureus (ATCC 6538) bacterial stock culture were stored at −80° C. until use. 20 μL aliquots of thawed bacterial cultures were added to 10 mL of Tryptic Soy Broth (Teknova). These bacterial suspensions were serially incubated 3 times at 36° C. for 18-24 hours in an orbital shaker (New Brunswick Scientific), and then 1 time in polypropylene snap tubes (Fisher Healthcare) for 48 hours. Cultures were subsequently mixed on a vortex mixer (VWR Scientific) and allowed to settle. The upper two thirds of suspension from each tube was aspirated and OD600 was measured (Smart Spec Spectrophotometer 3000, Bio-Rad) to estimate bacterial density. The culture was diluted with phosphate buffer saline (Gibco Life Technologies) to achieve a bacterial inoculum concentration near a target value of 1.0×10.sup.7 CFU/mL. 0.25 mL of 5% fetal bovine serum (Gibco Life Technologies) and 0.05 mL Triton X-100 (Amresco Pro Pure) were added to 4.70 mL bacterial suspension to aid in spreading the inoculum. Each test coupon was inoculated with 20 μL of the bacterial test culture. The inoculum volume was spread evenly using bent sterile pipette tips (Mettler-Toledo) to ensure full and even coverage, spreading as close to the edge of the coupon as possible. Coupons were then incubated in a controlled environment set at 42% relative humidity and 23° C. for a period of 120 min. Following the 120-minute exposure period, coupons were neutralized in Letheen broth (Gen Lab). Ten-fold serial dilutions of the neutralized solutions were plated using standard spread plate technique on Tryptic Soy Agar plates and incubated for 24 hours at 36° C. to yield countable numbers of survivors (approximately 20-200 colonies per plate). Log and percentage of reductions for bactericidal efficacy tests measure differences in CFUs between stainless steel and test material (e.g., glass) containing coupons. For the surface to be considered a sanitizer, a greater than or equal to 99.9% reduction (at least 3 log reduction) must be demonstrated.
[0113] According to an exemplary aspect, both glass and glass-ceramic materials disclosed herein were sanitizers. As an example, a 3 log reduction equals about 99.9% of the microbes killed, shown as a diamond in the ternary diagram of
[0114] Amorphous microstructure may be advantageous for applications that require bulk parts because machining may be much easier than for compositions that are surface-nucleated glass-ceramics. Such bulk parts may include architectural products, such as push plates on doors and other high-touch areas in hospitals, schools, and office buildings. Furthermore, compositions of the ternary of
[0115]
[0116] Referring to
[0117] Referring to
[0118] The melt and coupon (
[0119] The following Table 1 includes compositions measured using the United States EPA Test Method for Efficacy of Copper Alloy Surfaces as a Sanitizer test disclosed above, compositions were measured with inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy. “StDev” refers to standard deviation. Additional compositions were melted and yet not tested.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 BFS BFW BGF BGG BGW BGZ Batched (mol %) CuO 15 15 25 25 40 45 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 25.5 34 15 10 10 10 P.sub.2O.sub.5 59.5 51 60 65 50 45 Analyzed (mol %) CuO 16.8 16.4 28.6 29.1 38.8 41.3 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 24.7 31.7 14.4 9.8 7.9 8.2 P.sub.2O.sub.5 58.5 52.0 57.0 61.2 45.7 39.9 SiO.sub.2 7.5 10.6 Analyzed (mol %)-silica normalized out CuO 16.8 16.4 28.6 29.1 42.0 46.2 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 24.7 31.7 14.4 9.8 8.6 9.2 P.sub.2O.sub.5 58.5 52.0 57.0 61.2 49.4 44.6 Sum 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Log Kill 0.05 −0.09 0.44 0.84 1.37 0.42 StDev 0.12 −0.15 0.02 0.12 0.04 0.08 % Kill 9 −31 64 85 96 62 StDev 25 12 2 4 0.4 7 Copper BHA BHB BGQ BHE metal Batched (mol %) CuO 50 55 40 50 Fe2O3 10 10 5 5 P2O5 40 35 55 45 Analyzed (mol %) CuO 47.2 52.9 40.3 48.3 Fe2O3 8.3 8.5 4.2 4.1 P2O5 37.2 32.7 49.5 41.1 SiO2 7.2 5.9 6.1 6.5 Analyzed (mol %)-silica normalized out CuO 50.9 56.3 42.9 51.7 Fe2O3 9.0 9.0 4.4 4.3 P2O5 40.1 34.7 52.7 44.0 Sum 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 Log Kill 1.19 4.3 0.43 4.3 5.2 StDev 0.02 0.02 % Kill 94 100 63 100 100 StDev 0.2 1
[0120] According to an exemplary aspect, material disclosed herein has a CIELAB L* value below 35 on the scale of 0 black to 100 white, such as below 30, a CIELAB a* value within 5 of zero on a scale of ±100, such as within 3 of zero, such as within 1 of zero, and/or a CIELAB b* value within 5 of zero on a scale of ±100, such as within 3 of zero, such as within 1 of zero. In embodiments the material is black. In embodiments, the CIELAB L* value may be at least 35, absolute value of a* may be greater than 5, and absolute value of b* may be greater than 5, and/or some or all the CIELAB values are at least 10 away from burnt orange (50 L*, 44 a*, and 61 b*). In embodiments, the material is otherwise colored. In embodiments, the material is optionally burnt orange in color. The following Table 1A includes color coordinates for the BHB and BHE materials where L* is the index that goes from black at 0 to white at 100, a* goes from green (−) to red (+), and b* goes from blue (−) to yellow (+), with measurement conditions: D65-10, % R MAV SCI UVC Color i7.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 1A L* a* b* BHB Average 37.61 8.47 6.39 Stdev 0.11 0.46 0.37 BHE Average 28.77 −0.04 −0.35 Stdev 0.35 0.02 0.12
[0121] According to an exemplary aspect, materials disclosed herein may have copper and iron oxidation state distributions as described below. Determination of copper and iron oxidation state distribution: in embodiments, the samples may be dissolved in the presence of a known amount of Cr.sup.+6, in the form of K.sub.2Cr.sub.2O.sub.7, which is in small excess of what is consumed by the reaction:
3Cu.sup.+1+Cr.sup.+6.fwdarw.3Cu.sup.+2+Cr.sup.+3
The remaining Cr.sup.+6 is determined by titration with Fe.sup.+2. The resulting value from the test is the total reducing power, i.e. Fe.sup.+2 and Cu.sup.+1. This result is compared to the total possible reducing power, R, based on the supplied estimated composition. The value of R can vary freely from 0 to 1, with zero meaning no reduced species present and 1 meaning no oxidized species present. As such the larger the value, the more reduced is the glass. Materials disclosed herein may have an R value of over 0.5, such as for materials having sanitizer and antimicrobial properties disclosed herein, such as over 0.55, over 0.6, over 0.65. The R value may optionally be 0.55 or less, such as 0.45 to 0.55, or over 0.65, such as at least 0.7, at least 0.8, at least 0.9.
[0122] As indicated above, in embodiments, the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO materials may have other constituents, such as contaminants or additives to facilitate manufacturing. The materials optionally include at least some silica, such as examples BGW and BGZ in Table 1 above, which include 7.5 mol % and 10.6 mol % SiO.sub.2 respectively when analyzed, possibly due to contamination from melting at high temperatures (e.g., 1350° C. for 5 hours) in quartz crucible. Other examples in Table 1 included SiO.sub.2 as a constituent. Accordingly, Applicants discovered that SiO.sub.2 may be added to the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO materials, where resulting glasses and/or glass-ceramics still provide antimicrobial properties, as evidenced by Table 1 above. While such materials may be described as “mostly ternary” as disclosed above, as SiO.sub.2 is purposely added and in greater amounts, resulting materials may also be described as part of a P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system.
[0123] Embodiments in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system are all black, and fall within ranges of CIELAB parameters disclosed above. Embodiments in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system may be processed (e.g., batched, melted, mixed, fined, drawn, annealed, etc.) to single-phase glasses and glass articles (e.g., push plates, frit), such as where the glasses are fully amorphous, such as through a bulk of the glass while possibly excluding a thin surface film as disclosed above. Embodiments in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system exhibit full kill by the U.S. EPA dry test. Surprisingly, glasses in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system, as disclosed herein, may be formed under normal atmospheric conditions, reducing complexity of manufacturing and environmental controls. Further, such glasses may be machined under normal conditions with regularly used solutions (e.g., diamond saw, laser cutting, controlled fracture after scribing, etc.).
[0124] According to an exemplary aspect, glasses in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system disclosed herein may still be characterized as “phosphate glasses,” where in such aspects of the innovation the mol % of P.sub.2O.sub.5 is equal to or greater than SiO.sub.2 and/or such that P.sub.2O.sub.5 is a primary or main network former of the glass. As disclosed above, composition constituents in percentage of total moles (mol %) include at least 10 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, such as at least 15 mol %, and preferably in embodiments at least 25 mol % such as for improved antimicrobial properties, such as at least 30 mol %, such as at least 35 mol %, and/or no more than 75 mol %, such as no more than 63 mol %, and preferably in embodiments no more than 50 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5 such as for improved antimicrobial properties.
[0125] However, as evidenced by examples BGW and BGZ in Table 1 above, Applicants have discovered that in embodiments, an amount of P.sub.2O.sub.5 can be offset or reduced by inclusion of some SiO.sub.2 as a constituent. Applicants have found SiO.sub.2 content can be used to control dissolution behavior of glass. For example, P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 system glasses with higher SiO.sub.2 contents may exhibit lower chemical durability, which could be an advantage for applications such as paint additives where faster dissolution may be beneficial. As SiO.sub.2 may be more readily available, substitution of SiO.sub.2 for P.sub.2O.sub.5 may have efficiency and cost advantages. Furthermore, as evidenced by examples BGW and BGZ, Applicants find SiO.sub.2 in the glass expands options of equipment that can be used to process (e.g., melt and deliver) the glasses to include quartz and quartz-lined equipment.
[0126] As a constituent in glasses and glass-ceramics as disclosed herein, SiO.sub.2 may be non-zero, such as a positive amount of SiO.sub.2, such as at least 1 mol %, such as at least 5 mol % as shown in Examples of Table 1, such as at least 10 mol % as shown by example BGZ of Table 1, such as at least 15 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.2, Ex2.3, Ex2.4, and Ex2.5 in Table 2, such as at least 20 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.3, Ex2.4, and Ex2.5 in Table 2, such as at least 25 mol % as shown by examples Ex2.4, and Ex2.5 in Table 2, such as at least 30 mol % as shown by example Ex2.5 in Table 2, and/or the amount of constituent SiO.sub.2 may be less than 50 mol %, such as less than 40 mol %, such as less than 35 mol %, such as less than 33 mol %. Applicants found that compositions with SiO.sub.2 contents greater than about 30 mol % may not melt well and or be easily poured into glasses, however glasses may optionally have greater than 50 mol % SiO.sub.2.
[0127] The following Table 2 includes sample phosphate glass compositions with SiO.sub.2 contents, according to an exemplary aspect, which have been measured for antimicrobial efficacy. The examples in the table may be described as mostly ternary, as defined above, or may be characterized as compositions in the P.sub.2O.sub.5—Fe.sub.2O.sub.3—CuO—SiO.sub.2 quaternary space. Notably, the examples of Table 2 exhibit full kill.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 2 Analyzed (mol %) Ex2.1 Ex2.2 Ex2.3 Ex2.4 Ex2.5 P.sub.2O.sub.5 40.8 36.7 34.0 31.9 30.9 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 4.0 3.5 3.3 3.1 3.0 CuO 46.1 41.6 38.5 36.1 35.2 SiO.sub.2 9.1 18.3 24.2 29.0 30.9 Log Kill 4.332 4.332 4.332 4.332 4.332 StDev 0 0 0 0 0 % Kill 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
[0128] Compositions of Table 2 were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry are “as-analyzed” amounts are provided in mol %. Note that each of the above examples in Table 2 have a log kill performance of at least 3, such as greater than 3. Log kill and % kill of Table 2 correspond to the EPA characterization disclosed above.
[0129] Referring to
[0130] In furtherance of the disclosure above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may include, in terms of as-analyzed and/or as-batched, constituent components: a non-zero amount of P.sub.2O.sub.5 or other oxide or compound containing phosphorus, such as at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %, at least 35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no more than 65 mol %, no more than 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no more than 40 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 20 mol %, or no more than 10 mol % in contemplated embodiments; and a non-zero amount of CuO or other oxide or compound containing copper, such as at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 25 mol %, at least 30 mol %, at least 35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no more than 65 mol %, such as no more than 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no more than 45 mol %, no more than 40 mol % in contemplated embodiments.
[0131] In terms of as-analyzed and/or as-batched constituent components of the material, the sum of CuO and P.sub.2O.sub.5 may be at least 50 mol % of the composition, such as at least 60 mol %, such as at least 70 mol %, and/or less than 95 mol %, such as less than 90 mol %, such as less than 80 mol % in embodiments. Further, amounts of CuO and P.sub.2O.sub.5 may be comparable to one another, such as where a difference (in absolute value) of constituent contribution therebetween in as-analyzed and/or as-batched quantities may be less than 30 mol %, such as less than 25 mol %, such as less than 20 mol %, such as less than 15 mol %, such as less than 10 mol %.
[0132] As disclosed above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, the material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may further include additional constituents, either as-batched or as-analyzed, such as at least one additional constituent (e.g., an oxide of iron, such as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, an oxide of silicon, such as SiO.sub.2) having a non-zero mol %, such as at least 0.01 mol %, at least 0.1 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %, at least 35 mol %, at least 40 mol %, at least 50% and/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no more than 65 mol %, no more than 60 mol %, no more than 55 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no more than 40 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 20 mol %, no more than 10 mol % in contemplated embodiments for the at least one additional constituent.
[0133] Furthermore, the material may include at least two additional constituents beyond P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO, such as SiO.sub.2 and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, where either or any of the at least two additional constituents have a non-zero mol %, such as at least 0.01 mol %, at least 0.1 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 20% or more and/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 70 mol %, no more than 65 mol %, no more than 60 mol %, no more than 50 mol %, no more than 35 mol %, no more than 30 mol %, no more than 25 mol %, no more than 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no more than 8 mol % in contemplated embodiments, or any combination of such ranges for the additional constituents such as 1 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤15 mol % and 0≤SiO.sub.2≤35 mol %, for example.
[0134] The constituents of P.sub.2O.sub.5, CuO, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and SiO.sub.2 in sum with one another may make up a majority of the material, in terms of as-batched or as-analyzed mol %, such as where (P.sub.2O.sub.5+CuO+Fe.sub.2O.sub.3+SiO.sub.2) is at least 60 mol %, at least 70 mol %, at least 80 mol %, at least 90 mol %, and/or but clearly not more than 100 mol %, such as not more than 99 mol % in contemplated embodiments, such as not more than 95 mol %, not more than 90 mol %, or not more than 80 mol %, such as where additional constituents may be added to the composition. The amount of SiO.sub.2 may be more than Fe.sub.2O.sub.3; and/or constituents of P.sub.2O.sub.5, CuO, and SiO.sub.2 in sum with one another may make up a majority of the material, in terms of as-batched or as-analyzed mol %, such as where (P.sub.2O.sub.5+CuO+SiO.sub.2) is at least 65 mol %, at least 75 mol %, at least 80 mol %, at least 90 mol %, and/or but clearly not more than 100 mol %, such as not more than 99 mol % in embodiments, such as not more than 95 mol %, not more than 90 mol %, or not more than 80 mol %.
[0135] As disclosed above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, the material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may be characterized as a phosphate glass and accordingly may have a substantial phosphorus component. For example, as-batched or as analyzed SiO.sub.2 may be less than P.sub.2O.sub.5 as a constituent, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol % and/or not, such as where SiO.sub.2 and P.sub.2O.sub.5 are about the same (e.g., within 1 mol %). In contemplated embodiments, SiO.sub.2 is greater than P.sub.2O.sub.5 as a constituent component of the material composition, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %. Similarly, as-batched or as analyzed SiO.sub.2 may be less than CuO as a constituent, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol % and/or not, such as where SiO.sub.2 and CuO are about the same (e.g., within 1 mol %), or where SiO.sub.2 is greater than CuO in contemplated embodiments, such as by at least 1 mol %, such as at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 10 mol %, at least 15 mol %, at least 20 mol %, at least 30 mol %. As indicated, Applicants find use of some SiO.sub.2 to have benefits, but too much SiO.sub.2 in phosphate glasses and glass-ceramics as disclosed herein can be difficult to process.
[0136] In furtherance of disclosure above and as evidenced by examples disclosed, material (e.g., glass, glass-ceramic) may include, in terms of as-analyzed and/or as-batched, constituent components P.sub.2O.sub.5 or other oxide or compound containing phosphorus in amounts as disclosed above and CuO or other oxide or compound containing copper in amounts as disclosed above. The sum of CuO and P.sub.2O.sub.5 (i.e. CuO+P.sub.2O.sub.5 in mol %) may be substantial in the material, such as at least 50 mol % of the composition or other amounts as disclosed above.
[0137] Further, the material may include additional constituents, either as-batched or as-analyzed, such as at least one additional constituent (e.g., an oxide of iron, such as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, an oxide of silicon, such as SiO.sub.2) having a non-zero mol %, such as in amounts disclosed above. As indicated above, constituents of P.sub.2O.sub.5, CuO, and SiO.sub.2 in sum with one another (i.e. P.sub.2O.sub.5+CuO+SiO.sub.2 in mol %) may make up a majority of the material, in terms of as-batched or as-analyzed mol % and in amounts as disclosed above. With that said, the constituent(s) may be a constituent other than SiO.sub.2, as disclosed above, such as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 and/or different modifiers and other constituents such as MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO, Li.sub.2O, Na.sub.2O, K.sub.2O, TiO.sub.2, NiO, MnO.sub.2, and Al.sub.2O.sub.3 or combinations thereof. And, in at least some such instances as disclosed above, the material may include at least two additional constituents beyond P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO, such as SiO.sub.2 and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, such as in amounts disclosed above.
[0138] The following Table 3 includes additional example of materials (e.g., glass, glass-ceramics) according to an exemplary aspect.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 3 Analyzed (mol %) Ex. A Ex. B Ex. C Ex. D Ex. E Ex. F Ex. G P.sub.2O.sub.5 40.4 41 39.8 39.4 38.1 40.1 41.4 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 CuO 47.7 48.8 47.9 48.2 47.3 46.3 47.8 SiO.sub.2 7.1 5.4 7 7.8 9.9 8.8 6.1 MgO 4.8 ZnO 4.8 CaO 5.4 SrO 4.7 BaO 4.7 Li.sub.2O 4.8 Na.sub.2O 4.8 K.sub.2O TiO.sub.2 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 NiO MnO.sub.2 Single Phase X X X X Glass Crystalline Cu X X X present (phase- separated) Log Kill 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 5.06 StDev 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 % Kill 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Analyzed (mol %) Ex. H Ex. I Ex. J Ex. K Ex. L Ex. M Ex. N P.sub.2O.sub.5 40 40.4 48.3 47.1 44.8 44.2 43.7 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 CuO 47.3 48.4 45.7 48.0 49.4 50.0 50.5 SiO.sub.2 8 6.4 6.1 4.9 0.8 1.0 1.3 MgO ZnO CaO SrO BaO Li.sub.2O Na.sub.2O K.sub.2O 4.8 TiO.sub.2 4.8 Al.sub.2O.sub.3 5.1 NiO 4.8 MnO.sub.2 4.6 Single X X X X X X X Phase Glass Crystalline Cu present (phase- separated) Log Kill 5.06 1.77 0.97 1.18 1.57 5.477 5.477 StDev 0.00 0.31 0.03 0.00 0.29 0.00 0.00 % Kill 100.0 98.1 89.2 93.4 97.0 100.0 100.0 StDev 0.0 1.3 0.9 0.1 1.9 0.0 0.0
[0139] Compositions of Table 3 were measured using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and are in “as-analyzed” amounts provided in mol % corresponding representative oxides of elemental components. Note that many of the above examples in Table 3 have a log kill performance of at least 3, such as greater than 3. “Log kill” and “% kill” of Table 3 correspond to the EPA characterization disclosed above. “X” in the category of “single phase glass” corresponds to the sample being fully amorphous and single-phase, while “X” in the “crystalline Cu present (phase-separated)” category corresponds to the example being a glass-ceramic with copper-containing crystals.
[0140] As demonstrated by examples in Table 3, among other disclosure herein, the material may comprise CuO and P.sub.2O.sub.5 in above disclosed amounts, plus an additional constituent, such as SiO.sub.2, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO, Li.sub.2O, Na.sub.2O, K.sub.2O, TiO.sub.2, NiO, MnO.sub.2, and/or Al.sub.2O.sub.3, where the corresponding material may display antimicrobial behavior, such as from fairly ineffective antimicrobial behavior to full kill by the U.S. EPA dry test. Interestingly, Applicants found binary CuO and P.sub.2O.sub.5 compositions (i.e. without additional constituents) in a similar composition range may not exhibit full kill, so at least one additional constituent (e.g., modifier component) may help facilitate antimicrobial behavior of the material.
[0141] Such materials may be fully amorphous, single phase materials, such as where the additional constituent includes ZnO, CaO, SrO, Na.sub.2O, and K.sub.2O-containing materials, or phase-separated and partially crystalline, such as where the additional constituent includes MgO, BaO, and Li.sub.2O-containing materials. As indicated above, microstructure of amorphous compositions may be advantageous for uses that include bulk parts, such as door push plates and elevator buttons for architectural applications. Single phase amorphous materials may be black, within the color ranges disclosed above, and the phase-separated materials appear mottled orange and black. Such materials could be used for applications that use antimicrobial powders or frit, such as additives for paint. Further, compositions of Table 3 are phosphate glasses, but these phosphate glasses may be formed and machined under normal atmospheric conditions (e.g., under 50° C. (exterior to the forming equipment, such as furnace), atmospheric pressure, zero humidity, open air).
[0142] Applicants have found Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may be difficult for some melting and/or forming processes as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may easily alloy with metals used in manufacturing processes. Using other modifier cations can be advantageous for manufacturing. For example, some or all of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may be substituted with R.sub.2O as a modifier, where R is an alkali metal, such as Li, Na, and/or K. In other examples, some or all of the Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may be substituted with R′O as a modifier, where R′ is an alkaline earth metal or zinc, such as Mg, Zn, Ca, Sr, Ba, for example. Still, in embodiments, some or all of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may be substituted with Ti, Ni, Mn, and/or Al, such as in the form of respective oxides thereof, such as TiO.sub.2, NiO, MnO.sub.2, and/or Al.sub.2O.sub.3.
[0143] In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass, may include P.sub.2O.sub.5 in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of alkali metal oxide, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzed or as-batched), at least 0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %, at least 4.5 mol % and/or no more than 25 mol %, such as no more than 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 12.5 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no more than 8 mol %, no more than 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol %, where the alkali metal oxide may be Li.sub.2O, as shown by Example F of Table 3, Na.sub.2O as shown by Example G, K.sub.2O as shown by Example H, or another alkali metal oxide or another amount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol %). In contemplated embodiments, the modifier may include more than one alkali metal oxide where the sum of the alkali metal oxides is in such a range.
[0144] The alkali metal oxide, as evidenced by Examples F, G, and H of Table 3, may be combined with SiO.sub.2 in embodiments, or may conceivably be in materials that include P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO, but without SiO.sub.2. For example, materials as disclosed herein may include P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO, in amounts as disclosed above, one or more alkali metal oxide constituents, such as Li.sub.2O, Na.sub.2O, K.sub.2O in amounts as disclosed above, and oxides of iron (denoted Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 for convenience) in ranges as disclosed above. For embodiments with an alkali metal oxide modifier, Applicants contemplate that ion-exchange strengthening of the glass family is possible.
[0145]
[0146] By contrast,
[0147]
[0148] In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass may include P.sub.2O.sub.5 in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of alkaline earth metal oxide and/or zinc oxide, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzed or as-batched), at least 0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %, at least 4.5 mol % and/or no more than 25 mol %, such as no more than 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 12.5 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no more than 8 mol %, no more than 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol %, where the alkaline earth metal oxide may be CaO, as shown by Example C of Table 3, MgO as shown by Example A, SrO as shown by Example D, BaO as shown by Example E, ZnO as shown in Example B, or another alkaline earth metal oxide or another amount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol %). In contemplated embodiments, the modifier may include more than one alkaline earth metal oxides where the sum of the alkaline earth metal oxides is in such a range.
[0149] The alkaline earth metal oxide, as evidenced by Examples A, C, D, E, and B (for zinc oxide) of Table 3, may be combined with SiO.sub.2 in embodiments, or may be in materials that include MgO, ZnO, CaO, SrO, BaO, but without SiO.sub.2. For example, materials as disclosed herein may include P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO, in amounts as disclosed above, one or more alkaline earth metal oxide constituents, such as MgO, CaO, SrO, BaO, or ZnO, in amounts as disclosed above, and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 in ranges as disclosed above.
[0150]
[0151]
[0152]
[0153]
[0154]
[0155] In embodiments, a material, such as an amorphous glass may include P.sub.2O.sub.5 in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %), CuO in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30%), and a non-zero amount of modifier oxides, such as metal oxides, such as at least 0.1 mol % (as-analyzed or as-batched) of any such oxide, at least 0.2 mol %, at least 0.5 mol %, at least 1 mol %, at least 2 mol %, at least 3 mol %, at least 4 mol %, at least 4.5 mol % and/or no more than 25 mol %, such as no more than 20 mol %, no more than 15 mol %, no more than 12.5 mol %, no more than 10 mol %, no more than 8 mol %, no more than 6 mol %, or no more than 5 mol %, such as modifier oxides may be titanium (e.g., TiO.sub.2) as shown by Example I, aluminum (e.g., Al.sub.2O.sub.3, alumina) as shown by Example L, nickel (e.g., NiO) as shown by Example M, manganese (e.g., MnO.sub.2) as shown by Example N, or another modifier oxide, such as another metal oxide or another amount thereof (e.g., none or more than 25 mol %). In contemplated embodiments, the composition may include more than one such oxide where the sum of the modifier oxides is in such a range.
[0156]
[0157]
[0158]
[0159]
[0160] Examples I and J from Table 3 include P.sub.2O.sub.5 in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30 mol %) and CuO in amounts as disclosed above (e.g., >30%), but only further include silica (SiO.sub.2) and not any other modifier or metal oxides. The log kill and % kill data in Table 3 shows that such materials are effective antimicrobial materials, but not as effective at killing or inhibiting microbes as other materials disclosed herein. Accordingly, in embodiments the material includes P.sub.2O.sub.5 and CuO in substantial amounts, as disclosed above, and further includes a modifier oxide other than or in addition to silica, such as a metal oxide, where that modifier oxide may be an oxide of iron, zinc, an alkaline earth metal, an alkali metal, titanium, aluminum, nickel, manganese, or other elements, oxides, or compounds, as may contribute other metals or constituents to improve the antimicrobial performance, color, strength, or other properties.
[0161] Applicants have found that certain modifiers in the composition, as disclosed herein, affect chemical dissolution behavior and staining that may be caused by normal wear (fingerprints, disinfectants, etc.) uses of the materials as cover glasses, antimicrobial plates, frit, etc., and that the compositional options disclosed herein exhibit full kill for various design needs. Further, as mentioned above, embodiments are phosphate glasses that may be formed and machined under normal atmospheric conditions, which allows for compatibility in various existing manufacturing and assembly processes.
[0162] For clarity, the copper constituent in embodiments is listed as “CuO” herein which is utilized herein as a representative or common-oxide constituent for a particular elemental component, such as, with respect to mol %, of all various oxides of copper (e.g., CuO, CuO.sub.2) in materials disclosed herein, including amorphous, single-phase glass. Accordingly, any use of “CuO” herein refers to any oxide of copper, such as CuO, CuO.sub.2, etc., unless specifically indicated otherwise. Similarly, oxides of iron are listed as “Fe.sub.2O.sub.3” herein by this convention, as well as other constitutes, but various oxidation states of iron may be present in the given molar percentages listed. Notably, many materials disclosed herein contain at least two multivalent elemental species, such as iron and copper, and oxidation-reduction (redox) of species may be difficult to breakdown at least because of different multivalent species. So, unless otherwise expressly specified in claims or elsewhere herein, this convention is used.
[0163] With that said, Applicants believe that a copper redox reaction may influence antimicrobial and/or antiviral effectiveness of the materials, where efficacy of copper ions decreases with increasing oxidation state such that Cu.sup.0 performs better than Cu.sup.1+ which performs better than Cu.sup.2+. According to contemplated embodiments, at least 0.1% of copper of the material (generally listed as CuO or cupric oxide herein above) is at Cu.sup.1+ and/or Cu.sup.0 oxidation state, such as at least 1%, at least 2%, at least 4%, at least 7%, at least 10%, at least 20%, at least 30%, at least 40%, at least 50%, at least 60%, at least 70%, at least 80%, at least 90%, and/or no more than 99.999%, such as no more than 99.9%, no more than 99%, no more than 98%, no more than 95%, no more than 90%, no more than 80%, no more than 70%, no more than 60%, or no more than 50% percent of all molar copper in the material. According to contemplated embodiments, the ratio of Cu.sup.+1 to Cu.sup.+2 is at least 0.01, such as at least 0.02, at least 0.04, at least 0.075, at least 0.1, at least 0.15, at least 0.2, at least 0.3, at least 0.33, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 5, 10, and/or no more than 200, such as no more than 100, no more than 70, no more than 20, no more than 10, no more than 6.6, no more than 5, no more than 3, no more than 2, no more than 1:1, no more than 0.9, no more than 0.7, or no more than 0.5 in contemplated embodiments. Applicants contemplate that the state of each species may be determined individually using Mossbauer spectroscopy.
[0164] Applicants have found that the process of annealing embodiments herein not only influences relaxation of internal stresses of the materials, but also internal microstructure. Annealing amorphous, single-phase glasses disclosed herein by conventional or standard annealing practices, such as returning the glasses to an oven and adding heat, and then lowering the temperature over time, may result in formation of crystals within the glass, converting the glass to a glass-ceramic. But, pre-heating a graphite mold or other receptacle with comparable thermodynamic properties and then adding newly formed amorphous or single-phase glass of the present disclosure to the receptacle (e.g., pouring in or placing on the receptacle) and allowing the glass to cool along with the pre-heated receptacle in open atmospheric conditions allows the glass to anneal, reducing residual stresses while still allowing the glass to remain amorphous and single-phase. As such, compositions disclosed herein as amorphous and single-phase, such as examples in Tables above, may also be annealed conventionally or purposely heat treated to grow a crystalline phase and convert the glass to a glass-ceramic, or may be annealed as disclosed and to be amorphous and single-phase glass, such as glass articles as disclosed.
[0165] Materials as disclosed above and further discussed below optionally balance weathering/crystallization, formability, and antimicrobial properties. These materials also balance color and microstructure of the glass. Such glass is a phosphate glass having an iron-containing oxide for durability and a copper-containing oxide for antimicrobial properties. Balancing each of these properties, the materials are advantageous for use in, for example, architectural applications that often utilize bulk materials. Such materials minimize a weathering effect on the glass article, have increased durability while allowing a release of copper to maintain antimicrobial properties, and have a black coloring.
[0166] Weathering is generally a corrosion effect on glass due to various environmental conditions. Therefore, an aspect of the compositions disclosed herein minimizes or prevents weathering to allow the glass to be used in architectural application in humid and/or hot conditions. Decreasing the weathering, therefore, results in increased longevity of the glass.
[0167] Some glass-ceramic compositions with antimicrobial properties may exhibit a burnt orange color, which can present challenges for utilizing the glass-ceramic for certain applications, such as architectural application. The orange or burnt-orange color is typically caused by cuprite crystals (Cu.sup.2+), which give the glass-ceramic antimicrobial properties. In such circumstances, color mitigation may be achieved with additives. But, changing the color may be difficult for certain applications of the glass-ceramic that utilize bulk parts, such as many architectural applications. One aspect of glass technology disclosed herein includes a composition of P.sub.2O.sub.5, F.sub.2O.sub.3, and CuO, as batched, or P.sub.2O.sub.5, F.sub.2O.sub.3, CuO and SiO.sub.2, as analyzed, and is a black (as disclosed above), single-phase glass, which has color and microstructure advantages. Accordingly, such glass disclosed herein is advantageous for architectural applications, such as push plates on doors and other high touch areas of places such as hospitals, schools, offices, etc.
[0168] Referring to
[0169] As illustrated in
[0170] As illustrated in
[0171] Notably, as discussed above, lower durability may be a beneficial attribute in certain applications, such as to quickly dissolve glass powders in paints to provide antimicrobial performance. However, in other applications, as explained above, higher durability is an advantage. Accordingly, an ability to influence durability by changing certain constituents (e.g., iron content) is a useful aspect of the technology disclosed herein.
[0172] Utilizing this weathering test information from the Comparative Examples, glass compositions with greater durability were developed. To minimize or prevent the weathering that occurred in the Comparative Examples, the glass composition was changed to a higher durability composition utilizing the iron-containing oxide, such as Fe.sub.2O.sub.3. Put another way, Applicants found increased durability accomplished by increasing the Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 content. Adding Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 increased durability of the glasses such that the surface crystallization and weathering was reduced or prevented.
[0173] However, Applicants discovered that while increase in Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 increased durability of the glass composition, adding too much Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 decreased the antimicrobial properties of the glass composition. Applicants believe too much Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 creates glass that is too durable and does not release enough copper to be effective as an antimicrobial glass. For example, it was found that too much Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 may result in devitrification upon pouring of mixed molten glass, during manufacturing. For high phosphorus- and copper-oxides batch compositions (e.g., >40 mol % of each), as disclosed above, Applicants discovered a concentration of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 greater than 12 mol % began to devitrify and a concentration greater than 15 mol % were mainly crystalline. As further discussed below, processing steps may be used with such glasses to control or limit crystal growth. Accordingly, the Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 concentration was increased enough to increase durability but maintained less than 15 mol % or less than 12 mol % to prevent the crystallization and/or devitrification for such applications benefitting from amorphous, antimicrobial glass of black color able to withstand use in open atmosphere without excessive weathering.
[0174] Certain higher durability compositions are illustrated in Table 5 below.
TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 BMS1 BMS2 BLF BLN BLT Batched mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5 45 45 45 45 47 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 11 11 10 12 10 CuO 44 44 45 43 43 Analyzed (mol %) P.sub.2O.sub.5 44.7 42.3 43.8 44.2 46.1 Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 9.4 9.5 8.6 10.3 8.5 CuO 44.9 45.2 46.5 43.6 43.6 SiO.sub.2 1.0 3.0 1.1 1.9 1.7 Log Kill 3.5 5.4 4.49 3.52 4.51 StDev 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.08 0.34 Durability in 85% RH Temperature (° C.) 45 — 45 45 45 Time (h) 144 — 144 144 144 Sample type ground & — ground & as poured as poured polished polished surface surface Appearance slight — slight slight slight degradation degradation degradation degradation
[0175] The BMS1 and BLF samples were poured, ground, and polished into coupons that were generally 25 mm by 25 mm and 1 mm thick. The coupons were then weather tested. The BLN and BLT samples were poured into molds and then broken into pieces. The pieces were not polished or machined prior to being tested. The examples listed in Table 5 were tested in 85% RH at 45° C. for 144 hours.
[0176] As indicated in Table 5 above, the glass compositions, as batched, included P.sub.2O.sub.5, CuO, and Fe.sub.2O.sub.3. The glass compositions are phosphate glasses that utilize the copper-containing oxide(s), “CuO,” to provide anti-microbial properties and the iron-containing oxide(s), “Fe.sub.2O.sub.3,” to increase durability. As analyzed, each of the examples includes P.sub.2O.sub.5, CuO, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and SiO.sub.2. The SiO.sub.2 may be optionally incorporated, for example, to reduce costs and/or due to contamination during melting in a quartz crucible. Different processing equipment (e.g., platinum-lined) may be used to prevent contamination.
[0177] Each of the examples in Table 5 are phosphate glasses and therefore have a greater amount of P.sub.2O.sub.5 than SiO.sub.2. The glass may include a concentration of P.sub.2O.sub.5 greater than 15 mol %, greater than 30 mol %, greater than 40 mol %, greater than 45 mol %, or greater than 50 mol % as batched and/or as analyzed; and/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 60 mol %, such as no more than 50 mol %. In certain aspects, the concentration of P.sub.2O.sub.5 is from 45 mol % to 47 mol %, as batched and/or as analyzed.
[0178] Additionally, the examples of Table 5 include CuO (oxides of copper in amounts with equivalent copper contribution of CuO) to facilitate antimicrobial properties. The copper ions (e.g., Cu.sup.+ and/or Cu.sup.2+) may be released within the glass to provide the antimicrobial properties listed in Table 5. Applicants believe that the amorphous structure of the glass may be advantageous for allowing release of the copper. As batched and as analyzed, the composition includes a concentration of CuO greater than 15 mol %, greater than 30 mol %, greater than 40 mol %, greater than 45 mol %, or greater than 50 mol %; and/or no more than 80 mol %, such as no more than 60 mol %, such as no more than 50 mol %. In certain aspects, the concentration of CuO is from 42 mol % to 48 mol %.
[0179] In various examples, the glass composition primarily includes monovalent copper (Cu.sup.+ or Cu.sup.1+). The monovalent copper, compared to bivalent copper (Cu.sup.2+), is generally more mobile within the glass article, which allows the copper to move to the surface of the glass article more easily to provide the antimicrobial properties. In comparison, bivalent copper may not be as freely movable within the glass and therefore glass with bivalent copper may exhibit less antimicrobial efficacy. Applicants have found antimicrobial efficacy of Cu ions decreases with efficacy, such that Cu.sup.0>Cu.sup.1+>Cu.sup.2+. Accordingly, when used for applications benefiting from antimicrobial performance, the glass includes a greater amount of monovalent copper than bivalent copper, or more preferably, the glass includes primarily (e.g., >80% of the copper, >90%, >95%) monovalent copper.
[0180] Applicants have discovered that the temperature at which the batch materials or constituents are melted may contribute to the amount of monovalent copper in the glass. For example, Applicants believe a higher temperature, such as melting the batch constituents at 1350° C., leads to a more reducing environment, which results in more copper being reduced to the monovalent state. When the glass is melted at lower temperatures, for example at 900° C., less copper is reduced to the monovalent state, which can cause the antimicrobial efficacy of the glass to be reduced. However, if a quartz crucible is used for melting the batch materials, higher temperature may result in more SiO.sub.2 contamination. Therefore, melting at an intermediate temperature, such as between 1050° C. and 1150° C. may be advantageous for reducing copper to the monovalent state while having a lesser effect on the quartz crucible, if such a crucible is used. Without using quartz, innovative methods of producing the materials include heating the copper to a temperature of at least 1050° C., such as at least 1150° C., 1350° C. during melting of the constituents.
[0181] Further, glass compositions from Table 5 include “Fe.sub.2O.sub.3” (oxides of iron in amounts with equivalent iron contribution of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3), which may increase durability of the glass composition, as discussed. Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 concentration for such aspects is less than 20 mol %, less than 15 mol %, or less than 10 mol %, as batched and/or as analyzed; and/or at least 3 mol %, at least 5 mol %, at least 7 mol %, at least 8 mol %. In certain aspects, the concentration of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 is from 7 mol % to 12 mol %, as batched and/or as analyzed. The amount of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 facilitates the durability and the antimicrobial properties of the glass composition. For example, samples with concentration greater than 15 mol % led to crystallization, and those with concentration greater than 12 mol % led to devitrification as disclosed above. But when the Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 concentration is too high, not enough copper is released to be effective as antimicrobial glass.
[0182] Glass structure may influence the chemical durability, and greater chemical durability results in lower antimicrobial efficacy through less release of copper in certain applications. The increase in iron appears to be related (e.g., generally proportional, directly proportional) to resistance to weathering. The iron creates a stronger, more chemically resistant bond. Applicants believe P—Fe—O bonds may be more resistant to weathering than P—O—P bonds alone. An aspect of the innovation includes P—O—P bonds in the material replaced with P—O—Fe(II) and P—O—Fe(III) bonds to increase the chemical durability. The glass article may include a combination of Fe.sup.2+ ions and Fe.sup.3+ ions to form the desired bonds. In certain aspects, the primary iron ion(s) in the glass article are Fe.sup.2+, Fe.sup.3+, or a combination thereof. The composition of the glass article may optionally include more Fe.sup.3+ ions than Fe.sup.2+ ions.
[0183] Composition of the glass article may well include two multivalent species (e.g., Fe and Cu), which are balanced with one another to provide durability and antimicrobial efficacy. Applicants discovered a relationship between copper and iron content, where iron content is enough for toughness but low enough to release Cu for antimicrobial purposes, and accordingly various aspects include coordinating the amounts of copper and iron constituents. For example, in certain aspects, the glass composition as-batched and/or as analyzed includes the ranges disclosed above, but more specifically with Fe.sub.2O.sub.3>7.5 mol % and CuO<47.5 mol %. In another such non-limiting example, the glass composition as-batched and/or as-analyzed includes Fe.sub.2O.sub.3>8 mol % and CuO<48 mol %. The balance between the iron ions and the copper ions provides the desired combination of durability and antimicrobial properties.
[0184] Referring to
[0185] The BMS2 sample was batched at 45 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, 11 mol % Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, and 44 mol % CuO. As analyzed, BMS2 included 42.3 mol % P.sub.2O.sub.5, 9.5 mol % Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, 45.2 mol % CuO, and 3.0 mol % SiO.sub.2. The SiO.sub.2 was likely a result of contamination. Compared to the BMS1 example, the BMS2 example includes a greater amount (in mol %) of CuO and SiO.sub.2. Notably, the BMS2 sample also displayed a greater log kill than BMS1, exhibiting a log kill of 5.4. The greater log kill, without being bound by theory, was likely a result of the increased CuO compared to BMS1. The BMS2 sample was not tested for durability, but without being bound by theory, would likely have similar durability as the BMS1 sample.
[0186] Referring to
[0187] Referring to
[0188] Referring to
[0189] Each of the samples BMS1, BLF, BLN, and BLT showed slight degradation in appearance or discoloration after testing at 85% RH at 45° C. for 144 hours. The tested glass samples exhibited high durability under aggressive testing circumstances. The glass compositions balanced the Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 to increase durability of the composition, while allowing the release of copper to provide the log kill values set forth in Table 5. Additionally, each of the samples listed in Table 5 had log kill performance of at least 3, such as greater than 3 or greater than 3.2. Log kill values of Table 5 correspond to the EPA characterization disclosed above. Moreover, each of the examples illustrated in
[0190] Further, in addition to composition, it was found that the surface roughness of the glass article that is exposed to high humidity and high temperature affects the surface crystallization and weathering. As illustrated in
[0191] To test the effect of surface texture on weathering, one portion of the BLO glass article had a rough saw cut surface and a second portion had a smooth, fractured surface. The BLO glass was exposed to 85% RH at 45° C. for 6 days. The first portion having the rough saw cut surface showed weathering and crystallization, while the second portion having the smooth, fractured surface exhibited no or little weathering. Based on this testing, it was found that surface texture contributed to the weathering effect on the glass, including on highly-durable glass articles, including the BLO glass.
[0192] Further, as illustrated in
[0193] Surfaces of sheets or articles (e.g., buttons, containers, dead front, panel) having an area of at least 1 cm.sup.2 comprising the innovations disclosed herein may be polished to have a root-mean-square surface roughness of less than 1 micrometer, such as less than 500 nanometers (nm), such as 200 nm, such as less than 100 nm, such as less than 50 nm, such as less than 20 nm, such as less than 10 nm, for example, which may improve color retention. Surfaces of sheets or articles having an area of at least 1 cm.sup.2 comprising the innovations disclosed herein may be polished to have Ra (arithmetic average of the absolute values of the profile height deviations from the mean line) within 1 cm the evaluation length, of less than 50 nm, such as less than 20 nm, such as less than 10 nm, such as less than 5 nm, such as less than 1 nm, for example. Surfaces of such sheets or articles may have areas of at least 2 cm.sup.2, such as at least 5 cm.sup.2, such as at least 10 cm.sup.2, such as at least 20 cm.sup.2, such as at least 50 cm.sup.2, for example.
[0194] With reference to
[0195] During formation, the glass compositions described herein may form a thin, crystalline layer on the surface when poured in an oxygenated atmosphere. Therefore, if desired such as for color control or machinability, to prevent or minimize the formation of the crystalline layer, Applicants developed methods that prevent crystallization, as further discussed herein.
[0196] Referring to
[0197] In step 106, at least one intermediate pretreatment may be performed on the batch materials. In certain aspects, one such intermediate pretreatment may be a calcining treatment to assist in reducing or removing moisture from the batch materials. Further, batch materials may be heated to a first temperature, which is generally a temperature from 250° C. to 300° C. The batch materials may be maintained at the first temperature for a predefined period of time, such as at least 12 hours. Such pretreatment may improve quality of the resulting material, such as in terms of coloration, antimicrobial performance, flatness.
[0198] In step 106, another such intermediate pretreatment may be performed at a second higher temperature, which may be 850° C. The batch materials may be maintained at the second temperature for a predefined period of time, for example at least one hour. In the second intermediate pretreatment, ammonium phosphate may be used to reduce or remove ammonia. Additionally, these intermediate pretreatments may also be advantageous for preventing or minimizing boiling that may occur if the batch materials are brought directly to a melting temperature of the batch constituents. Accordingly, such pretreatment may improve quality of the resulting material.
[0199] In step 108, the batch materials may be heated to the melting temperature of the batch constituents and/or maintained at the melting temperature for a predefined period of time, which may be at least about 30 minutes. The batch materials are melted into a molten glass composition. The melting temperature may be in a range from about 900° C. to about 1550° C. In certain aspects, the melting temperature may be in the range from about 1050° C. to about 1150° C.
[0200] For smaller batches, melting may be performed in a quartz crucible. During the melting process, SiO.sub.2 from the quartz crucible contaminates the molten glass composition, resulting in the glass, as analyzed, having P.sub.2O.sub.5, Fe.sub.2O.sub.3, CuO, and SiO.sub.2. The glass composition has less than or equal to 5 mol % of SiO.sub.2 as analyzed. Without being bound by theory, the higher the melting temperature, the greater the amount of SiO.sub.2 in the glass composition as analyzed and the lower the melting temperature, the lower the amount of SiO.sub.2.
[0201] Applicants discovered that cooling may influence crystallization of the materials disclosed herein. For example, in step 110, a mold for receiving the molten glass composition may be preheated. The mold may be a graphite mold. The mold may be preheated to a temperature from about 200° C. to about 300° C. The mold may be part of a stack of molds for the molten glass composition to be poured into. Preheating the mold may allow more gradual cooling of the material.
[0202] Applicants also discovered that environment may influence crystallization of the materials disclosed herein. For example, in step 112, the molten glass composition may be poured into the preheated mold in an inert environment. The inert environment may include at least one of Ar, N.sub.2, or another non-O.sub.2-containing environment. The mold generally has an inlet and an outlet for gasses, such as N.sub.2, to be released from the mold during the pour process. Applicants note that benefits of the inert atmosphere may be independent of the mold, and inert atmosphere may be used with other (e.g., convention) forms of controlled cooling or anneal for example to achieve benefits in terms of crystallization.
[0203] In step 114, molten glass is cooled in the mold to room temperature, which is generally in a range from about 20° C. to about 25° C. After cooling, glass articles used for measurements above were generally disc-shaped having a diameter of about six inches and a thickness of about 0.5 inches. Other molds can be used.
[0204] During the cooling process, the glass composition self-anneals to remove residual stresses within the glass article. As the molten glass composition cools to the glass article, the residual stresses are removed or reduced generally concurrently with the cooling process. The heat and length of the cooling process is advantageous for removing the residual stress from the glass article. The cooling process within the preheated mold may be at a rate slower than a cooling rate of the glass composition in ambient air. Accordingly, this method 100 allows for slower, more isothermal quenching and annealing.
[0205] In step 116, the glass article may be polished. Generally, each surface, including edges, are polished. Applicants discovered polishing the article improves weathering performance as discussed above. It was found that polishing the article to an “optical finish” where the glass article appears “shiny” was most resistant to atmospheric degradation. Matte finishes may also assist in resistant weathering, but may not be as effective as the “optical finish.”
[0206] To provide the smoother surface or surfaces, and consequently reduce weathering, the cooled glass article is polished or has a matte finish, particularly on the edges of the glass article. The nucleation and crystallization (e.g., the weathering) often begins at the rough surfaces as described herein. The weathering then grows from the rough surfaces to the polished surfaces. The edges of the glass article may generally be considered a rough surface without a polish or finish. If the rough surfaces and/or edges are not present, as there is polishing or finishing applied, these locations are not exposed to extreme conditions. Accordingly, the crystallization or weathering is then controlled.
[0207] The method 100 may be advantageous for generating less residual stress in the glass article. Less residual stress generally results in glass that is easier to machine. Further, method 100 may be more cost-effective as the cooling and the self-annealing generally occurs concurrently. It is contemplated that the steps of method 100 may be performed in any order, simultaneously, and/or omitted without departing from the teachings herein.
[0208] With reference now to
[0209] In step 158, the molten glass composition is poured onto a surface in the inert environment. The surface may be, for example, a steel table or graphite slab. The inert environment prevents interaction between the cooling glass article and oxygen, the interaction of which results in the crystallization. The inert environment may be, for example, Ar, N.sub.2, or another non-O.sub.2-containing environment.
[0210] In step 160, the molten glass composition is quenched to form the glass article. The quenching process quickly cools the glass from the molten composition to room temperature, forming the solid glass article. The quenching is performed in the inert environment to prevent the interaction with oxygen. In step 162, generally after the glass is fully cooled, the glass is annealed to reduce or remove residual stresses. The annealing is performed in a separate step from cooling the glass article. Generally, the glass article is placed in an oven and heated to remove the residual stresses. In this method 150, the residual stresses may be higher than those in method 100 due to the quicker cooling time. In step 164, the glass article is polished similar to step 116 in method 100 to reduce or remove rough surfaces that lead to greater weathering.
[0211] Method 150 may be advantageous for providing faster quenching rates, which may be advantageous for antimicrobial efficacy. It is contemplated that the steps of method 150 may be performed in any order, simultaneously, and/or omitted without departing from the teachings herein.
[0212] In methods 100, 150, the cooling of the molten glass composition to the glass article is performed in the inert environment. Each of these methods 100, 150 prevents, or at least minimizes, the surface reaction of the glass by preventing a reaction between the glass and oxygen during pour. If the glass article is partially cooled (e.g., has not reached room temperature), the glass article may react to oxygen if removed from the inert environment. Accordingly, the glass article is generally retained in the inert environment until the glass article has cooled to room temperature. Each method 100, 150 produces a glass that has little or no surface reaction to weathering. Additionally, these methods 100, 150 allow the phosphate glass described herein to be formed under normal atmospheric conditions and can be machined under normal conditions with regularly used solutions (e.g., diamond saw, laser cutting, controlled fracture after scribing, etc.). Further, these methods prevent the formation of crystals, thereby producing a glass rather than a glass-ceramic.
[0213] The glass composition disclosed herein is optionally an amorphous and/or single-phase glass. The single phase is generally a single glassy phase. In conventional glasses or glass-ceramics having multiple phases, each phase may have a different coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE). The difference in CTE creates additional residual stresses within the glass, which results in greater difficulty to machine the glass into solid surfaces. The single-phase, amorphous glass disclosed herein may be easier to cut, grind, machine, etc. into solid surfaces due to the lower residual stress. Further, the single-phase glasses provides strong antimicrobial efficacy.
[0214] In certain aspects, the composition, as batched and/or as analyzed, includes a concentration of P.sub.2O.sub.5 from 42 mol % to 47 mol %, a concentration of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 from 7 mol % to 12 mol %, and a concentration of CuO from 42 mol % to 48 mol %. In other words, the composition, as batched and/or as analyzed, includes 42 mol %≤P.sub.2O.sub.5≤47 mol %, 7 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %, and 42 mol %≤CuO≤48 mol %. Additionally, as analyzed, the composition includes a concentration of P.sub.2O.sub.5 from 42 mol % to 47 mol %, a concentration of Fe.sub.2O.sub.3 from 7 mol % to 12 mol %, a concentration of CuO from 42 mol % to 48 mol %, and SiO.sub.2 less than or equal to 5 mol %. In other words, the composition, as analyzed, includes 42 mol %≤P.sub.2O.sub.5≤47 mol %, 7 mol %≤Fe.sub.2O.sub.3≤12 mol %, 42 mol %≤CuO≤48 mol %, and SiO.sub.2≤5 mol %.
[0215] As described herein, the glass composition, with durability, color, and antimicrobial properties, may be advantageous for architectural applications. This glass composition described herein may also be used as an additive in paint, for example. If the glasses are being used in applications such as an additive in paint, then durability may not be as advantageous, and lower durability compositions may be utilized. The balance between color, antimicrobial properties, and minimizing crystallization are also advantageous when utilizing the compositions described herein for these additional applications.
[0216] Each of U.S. Application Nos. 63/023,518 filed May 12, 2020, Ser. No. 17/327,870 filed May 24, 2021, 63/088,525 filed Oct. 7, 2020, Ser. No. 17/068,272 filed Oct. 12, 2020, 63/136,381 filed Jan. 12, 2021, 63/151,210 filed Feb. 19, 2021, 63/177,536 filed Apr. 21, 2021, 63/209,489 filed May 11, 2021, 63/123,863 filed Dec. 10, 2020, 63/183,292 filed May 3, 2021, 63/183,271 filed May 3, 2021, and 63/222,462 filed Jul. 16, 2021, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. Each of U.S. Application Nos. 63/030,719 filed May 27, 2020,Ser. No. 17/331,050 filed May 26, 2021, 63/024,835 filed May 14, 2020, Ser. No. 17/319,538 filed May 13, 2021, and 63/009,102 filed Apr. 13, 2020, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. International application No. PCT/US21/24605 filed Mar. 29, 2021, is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
[0217] Each of U.S. Application Nos. 63/225,049 filed Jul. 23, 2021, and 63/226,868 filed Jul. 29, 2021, are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
[0218] Construction and arrangements of the compositions, structures, assemblies, and structures, as shown in the various aspects of the innovations, are illustrative only. Although only a few embodiments have been described in detail in this disclosure, many modifications are possible (e.g., variations in sizes, dimensions, structures, shapes, and proportions of the various elements, values of parameters, mounting arrangements, use of materials, colors, orientations) without materially departing from the novel teachings and advantages of the subject matter described herein. Materials disclosed herein may be useful for purposes other than controlling microbes, such as forming substrates, packaging, containers, covers, etc. The order or sequence of any process, logical algorithm, or method steps may be varied or re-sequenced according to an exemplary aspect. Other substitutions, modifications, changes, and omissions may also be made in the design, operating conditions, and arrangement of the various exemplary aspects without departing from the scope of the present inventive technology.