Method for cleaning silicon wafer

Abstract

A method for cleaning a silicon wafer includes the steps of: supplying hydrofluoric acid onto a surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer while rotating at a first rotational rate, stopping the supply of the hydrofluoric acid and shaking off hydrofluoric acid on the surface of the silicon wafer without supplying pure water onto the surface of the silicon wafer while rotating the silicon wafer at a second rotational rate which is the same as or faster than the first rotational rate, and supplying ozone water onto the surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer after shaking the hydrofluoric acid off the surface while rotating at a third rotational rate which is faster than the second rotational rate. This method for cleaning a silicon wafer is capable of suppressing adhesion of water marks and particles and enhancing the wafer quality.

Claims

1. A method for cleaning a silicon wafer, comprising, in the following order, the steps of: supplying hydrofluoric acid onto a surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer while rotating at a first rotational rate, thereby removing an oxide film of the surface of the silicon wafer and making the surface a hydrophobic surface, stopping the supply of the hydrofluoric acid and shaking off hydrofluoric acid present on the hydrophobic surface of the silicon wafer from which the oxide film has been removed without supplying pure water onto the hydrophobic surface of the silicon wafer while rotating the silicon wafer at a second rotational rate which is the same as or faster than the first rotational rate, and supplying ozone water onto the hydrophobic surface of the silicon wafer from which the oxide film has been removed to treat the silicon wafer after shaking the hydrofluoric acid off the surface while rotating at a third rotational rate which is faster than the second rotational rate, thereby performing reoxidation to the surface of the silicon wafer, wherein the first rotational rate is 100 rpm or less, the second rotational rate is 200 rpm or less, and the third rotational rate is 500 rpm or more.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing the inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer.

(2) FIG. 2 is a flow diagram showing the conditions of the method for cleaning a silicon wafer in Examples 1 to 9.

(3) FIG. 3 is a flow diagram showing the conditions of the method for cleaning a silicon wafer in Examples 10 to 15.

(4) FIG. 4 is a flow diagram showing the conditions of the method for cleaning a silicon wafer in Examples 16 to 21.

(5) FIG. 5 is a flow diagram showing the conditions of the method for cleaning a silicon wafer in Comparative Examples 1 to 3.

(6) FIG. 6 is a flow diagram showing a conventional method for cleaning a silicon wafer.

(7) FIG. 7 is a graph showing the results of the Examples and Comparative Examples.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

(8) Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in detail as an example of an embodiment with reference to the drawings, but the present invention is not limited thereto.

(9) The present invention is a method for cleaning a silicon wafer, and firstly, hydrofluoric acid is supplied onto a surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer while rotating at a first rotational rate. Next, the supply of the hydrofluoric acid is stopped and hydrofluoric acid present on the surface of the silicon wafer is shaken off without supplying pure water onto the surface of the silicon wafer while rotating the silicon wafer at a second rotational rate which is the same as or faster than the first rotational rate. Next, ozone water is supplied onto the surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer after shaking the hydrofluoric acid off the surface while rotating at a third rotational rate which is faster than the second rotational rate. The inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer includes the above steps in the order described.

(10) The inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer will be described more specifically with reference to FIG. 1. FIG. 1 is a flow diagram showing the inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer.

(11) A known spin cleaning machine can be used in the inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer. In the inventive method for cleaning a silicon wafer, firstly, as shown in FIG. 1(1), hydrofluoric acid is supplied onto a surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer while rotating at a first rotational rate (step 1). An oxide film (natural oxide film) formed on the surface of the silicon wafer is completely removed by this step 1. The first rotational rate is preferably under a condition of low rate rotation of 100 rpm or less. In this way, particles on the wafer surface are removed and metallic contamination and the like is removed.

(12) Next, as shown in FIG. 1(2), the supply of the hydrofluoric acid is stopped and hydrofluoric acid present on the surface of the silicon wafer is shaken off without supplying pure water onto the surface of the silicon wafer while rotating the silicon wafer at a second rotational rate (step 2). Here, the second rotational rate is the same as or faster than the first rotational rate. The second rotational rate is preferably a low rate rotation (medium rate rotation) of 200 rpm or less. An important point of the present invention is not to use pure water on a wafer whose wafer surface has become a hydrophobic surface due to the oxide film being removed by the hydrofluoric acid treatment. In this way, formation of water marks on the wafer surface is prevented. Note that the lower limit of the low rotation rate is 50 rpm due to apparatus restriction.

(13) Next, as shown in FIG. 1(3), it is preferable to have a step of raising the rotational rate (step 3). This is for raising the rotational rate to the rotational rate (third rotational rate) of the ozone water treatment (step 4) described below.

(14) Next, as shown in FIG. 1(4), ozone water is supplied onto the surface of the silicon wafer to treat the silicon wafer while rotating at a third rotational rate, the hydrofluoric acid having been shaken off the surface (step 4). The third rotational rate is faster than the second rotational rate. In this step 4, reoxidation treatment of the silicon wafer surface is performed by the action of the ozone water. The third rotational rate is preferably 500 rpm or more. It is considered that the higher the high rotation rate (third rotational rate) at the time of the acceleration step (step 3) and the ozone water treatment step (step 4), the better, but approximately 1500 rpm is substantially the upper limit due to apparatus restriction.

(15) After performing the ozone water treatment, next, as shown in FIG. 1(5), the silicon wafer can be dried (step 5). The drying step can be performed by stopping the ozone water supply and continuing the rotation of the silicon wafer. The rotational rate is not particularly limited but it is preferably the same as or faster than the third rotational rate.

(16) By the above method which has the steps shown in FIG. 1, it is possible to eliminate generation of water marks and clean the silicon wafer without adhesion of particles and the like that are generated when the oxide film is removed with hydrofluoric acid.

(17) The functions and effects of each of the inventive steps are as follows. In the hydrofluoric acid treatment of step 1, by removing the oxide film at a low rate rotation (preferably 100 rpm or less), it is possible to remove particles while suppressing generation of water marks and the like. If a rinse treatment by pure water or ozone water is performed subsequently at the same rotational rate as is conventional, water marks are generated. Accordingly, in the present invention, in order to prevent water marks and re-adhesion of particles due to the rinse treatment, after shaking off the hydrofluoric acid chemical solution at a low rate rotation (medium rate rotation, preferably 200 rpm or less) without supplying pure water after removing the oxide film with hydrofluoric acid in step 2, the step of increasing the rotational rate (preferably accelerating to 500 rpm or more) (step 3) is performed, and the reoxidation treatment (step 4) is performed with ozone water after acceleration (preferably 500 rpm or more). If pure water is used in the rinse treatment, water marks are generated, and therefore, pure water rinsing is not used in the present invention. Therefore, in the present invention, pure water rinsing is not performed (pure water substitution is not performed) before shaking off the hydrofluoric acid after removing the oxide film with hydrofluoric acid, and naturally, pure water rinsing is not performed after shaking off the hydrofluoric acid either. In addition, increasing the rotational rate in step 3 and supplying the ozone water in step 4 described above may be performed simultaneously.

(18) By removing the oxide film completely under a low rate condition of 100 rpm or less in the hydrofluoric acid treatment, the adhesion of particles on the wafer surface is improved. In the present invention, further, after subsequently shaking off the HF on the wafer at a low rate rotation (medium rate rotation, preferably 200 rpm or less), the rotation is accelerated to a high rate rotation (preferably 500 rpm or more) and the ozone water treatment is performed at the high rate rotation.

EXAMPLE

(19) Hereinafter, the present invention will be described more specifically with reference to Examples and Comparative Examples, but the present invention is not limited to these Examples.

Examples 1 to 9

(20) A silicon wafer was cleaned in accordance with the inventive flow diagram shown in FIG. 1. The rotational rates of the silicon wafer in steps 1 to 4 were set so as to satisfy the range of rotational rates shown in FIG. 2. That is, a step of removing an oxide film (step 1) was performed at a low rate rotation of 100 rpm or less, and after a step of shaking off a chemical solution at a rotational rate of 200 rpm or less (step 2) was performed, the process proceeded to an acceleration step (step 3) with a high rate rotation of 500 rpm or more, a step of forming an oxide film with ozone water (step 4) was performed at a high rate rotation of 500 rpm or more, and subsequently, drying (step 5) was performed.

(21) The chemical solution used was hydrofluoric acid and ozone water, and pure water was not used. Note that the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid in step 1 was set to 1.0 mass %, the hydrofluoric acid treatment duration was set to 30 seconds, and the rotational rate at this time was set to 50 rpm. In addition, the concentration of the ozone water in step 4 was set to 20 ppm by mass. The ozone water treatment duration in step 4 was set to 60 seconds. The drying in step 5 was performed at 1000 rpm for 60 seconds.

(22) In Example 1, the first rotational rate was set to 50 rpm, the second rotational rate to 50 rpm, and the third rotational rate to 500 rpm. In Examples 2 to 9, the second rotational rate (the rotational rate at which the chemical solution is shaken off) and the third rotational rate (the rotational rate at the time of the acceleration process and the oxide film formation) were set as shown in Table 1.

(23) The number of defects on the silicon wafer after the cleaning and drying were finished was counted and shown in Table 1. For counting the number of defects on the silicon wafer, SP5 manufactured by KLA-Tencor Corporation was used.

(24) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Rotational rate at which Rotational chemical rate at the solution was Acceleration time of oxide shaken off process film formation (second (third (third rotational rotational rotational Number rate) rate) rate) of (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) defects Example 1 50 500 500 20 Example 2 50 1000 1000 13 Example 3 50 1500 1500 12 Example 4 100 500 500 8 Example 5 100 1000 1000 9 Example 6 100 1500 1500 12 Example 7 200 500 500 22 Example 8 200 1000 1000 10 Example 9 200 1500 1500 13

(25) In Examples 1 to 9 in which the cleaning flow of FIG. 2 was used, adhesion of particles onto the wafer surface was considerably improved by, after shaking off the chemical solution at 200 rpm or less without performing pure water rinsing after removing the oxide film with hydrofluoric acid, shifting to a high rate rotation of 500 rpm or more and then performing the oxide film formation treatment with ozone water.

Comparative Examples 1 to 3

(26) A silicon wafer was cleaned in accordance with the conventional cleaning flow shown in FIG. 6. The rotational rate in each step was set so as to be within the range shown in FIG. 5. In this conventional cleaning flow, oxide film removal was performed at a low rate rotation of 100 rpm or less with hydrofluoric acid (FIG. 5(a)) and a rinse treatment was performed with pure water and ozone water while shifting to a high rate rotation (500 rpm or more) (FIGS. 5(b) and (c)). Subsequently, drying (FIG. 5(d)) was performed.

(27) In Comparative Examples 1 to 3, the chemical solution used was hydrofluoric acid, pure water, and ozone water. Note that the concentration of the hydrofluoric acid was set to 1.0 mass %, the hydrofluoric acid treatment duration was set to 30 seconds, and the rotational rate in the hydrofluoric acid treatment was set to 50 rpm, the same as in Examples 1 to 9. In addition, the concentration of the ozone water was set to 20 ppm by mass, and the ozone water treatment duration was set to 60 seconds, the same as in Examples 1 to 9. The drying was also performed at 1000 rpm for 60 seconds, the same as in Examples 1 to 9.

(28) The rotational rate at which the chemical solution was shaken off, the rotational rate at the time of the pure water substitution, and the rotational rate at the time of the oxide film formation in Comparative Examples 1 to 3 were set as shown in Table 2. Since the pure water substitution was performed while performing the acceleration process, the maximum rate in the acceleration process is the same as the maximum rotational rate at the time of the pure water substitution.

(29) As in Examples 1 to 9, the number of defects on the silicon wafer after the cleaning and drying were finished was counted and shown in Table 2. For counting the number of defects on the silicon wafer, SP5 manufactured by KLA-Tencor Corporation was used.

(30) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Rotational Rotational Rotational rate at which rate at the rate at the chemical Accel- time of the time of solution was eration pure water oxide film Number shaken off process substitution formation of (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) defects Comparative 200 500 500 500 152 Example 1 Comparative 200 1000 1000 1000 160 Example 2 Comparative 200 1500 1500 1500 177 Example 3

(31) It can be seen from Table 2 that in Comparative Examples 1 to 3, there are many defects on the wafer surface. This is because, in the conventional method, there is considerable adhesion of water marks and particles due to the rinse treatment with pure water and ozone water being performed while shifting to the high rate rotation (500 rpm or more).

Examples 10 to 15

(32) A silicon wafer was cleaned in accordance with the inventive flow diagram shown in FIG. 1. Note that the rotational rates of the silicon wafer in steps 1 to 4 were set so as to satisfy the range of rotational rates shown in FIG. 3. Except that the rotational rate in step 2 (the second rotational rate) has a different range, the other conditions are the same as in Examples 1 to 9. That is, the oxide film removal step (step 1) was performed at a low rate rotation of 100 rpm or less, but the step of shaking off the chemical solution (step 2) was performed at a rate faster than 200 rpm as the second rotational rate, which is different from Examples 1 to 9. Subsequently, as in Examples 1 to 9, the process proceeded to an acceleration step (step 3) with a high rate rotation of 500 rpm or more, a step of forming an oxide film (step 4) was performed at a high rate rotation of 500 rpm or more with ozone water, and subsequently, drying (step 5) was performed. In Examples 10 to 15, the second rotational rate (the rotational rate at which the chemical solution is shaken off) and the third rotational rate (the rotational rate at the time of the acceleration process and the oxide film formation) were set as shown in Table 3.

(33) The number of defects on the silicon wafer after the cleaning and drying were finished was counted as in Examples 1 to 9 and shown in Table 3.

(34) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Rotational rate at which Rotational chemical rate at the solution was Acceleration time of oxide shaken off process film formation (second (third (third rotational rotational rotational Number rate) rate) rate) of (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) defects Example 10 300 500 500 51 Example 11 300 1000 1000 50 Example 12 300 1500 1500 54 Example 13 400 500 500 70 Example 14 800 1000 1000 76 Example 15 1200 1500 1500 64

(35) As seen from Table 3, when the process of shaking off the chemical solution is made faster than 200 rpm, the number of defects increases, but there are fewer defects compared to the conventional method (Comparative Examples 1 to 3).

Examples 16 to 21

(36) A silicon wafer was cleaned in accordance with the inventive flow diagram shown in FIG. 1. Note that the rotational rates of the silicon wafer in steps 1 to 4 were set so as to satisfy the range of rotational rates shown in FIG. 4. Except that the rotational rates in step 3 and step 4 have a different range, the other conditions are the same as in Examples 1 to 9. That is, the oxide film removal step (step 1) was performed at a low rate rotation of 100 rpm or less and the step of shaking off the chemical solution (step 2) was performed at a rotational rate of 200 rpm or less. Subsequently, unlike in Examples 1 to 9, the process proceeded to an acceleration step (step 3) with a rotational rate of less than 500 rpm, a step of forming an oxide film with ozone water (step 4) was performed at a rotational rate of less than 500 rpm, and subsequently, drying (step 5) was performed. In Examples 16 to 21, the second rotational rate (the rotational rate at which the chemical solution is shaken off) and the third rotational rate (the rotational rate at the time of the acceleration process and the oxide film formation) were set as shown in Table 4.

(37) The number of defects on the silicon wafer after the cleaning and drying were finished was counted as in Examples 1 to 9 and shown in Table 4.

(38) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Rotational rate at which Rotational chemical rate at the solution was time of oxide shaken off film formation (second (third rotational Acceleration rotational Number rate) process rate) of (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) (r.p.m.) defects Example 16 50 50 200 45 Example 17 50 100 300 51 Example 18 50 400 400 42 Example 19 200 50 250 57 Example 20 200 100 300 61 Example 21 200 400 400 55

(39) As seen from Table 4, in Examples 16 to 21, the number of defects increased compared to Examples 1 to 9. This is because, if the acceleration and the ozone water treatment after shaking off the chemical solution are performed at less than 500 rpm, the oxide film formation rate becomes uneven and particles adhere to parts where oxidation with ozone water is delayed. However, in Examples 16 to 21, the number of defects decreased compared to Comparative Examples 1 to 3. When the acceleration process is slower than the process of shaking off the chemical solution, an acceleration process is not performed and the rate is lowered, and therefore, the oxide film formation with ozone water is performed starting at a rate lower than the rotational rate at the time of the oxide film formation, thereby causing unevenness in the oxide film formation rate due to insufficient rotational rate, which causes particle adhesion.

(40) FIG. 7 shows a graph which summarizes the number of defects in Examples 1 to 21 and Comparative Examples 1 to 3. As seen from FIG. 7, the number of defects is small in Examples 1 to 21 compared to Comparative Examples 1 to 3, which means the advantage of the present invention has been gained. In particular, the number of defects is remarkably small in Examples 1 to 9. As described, after delaminating the oxide film with hydrofluoric acid, the process of shaking off the hydrofluoric acid was performed at a low rate (medium rate) of 200 rpm or less without discharging a chemical solution such as rinse, and subsequently, the rate was accelerated to 500 rpm or more and then the oxide film formation treatment was performed with ozone water, and in this way, the best effect was obtained.

(41) It should be noted that the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiments. The embodiments are just examples, and any examples that have substantially the same feature and demonstrate the same functions and effects as those in the technical concept disclosed in claims of the present invention are included in the technical scope of the present invention.