Iron-catalyzed selective production of methyl esters from aldehydes

Abstract

A process for making methyl esters in high yields is provided. The process comprises contacting aliphatic or aromatic aldehydes and methanol with an iron catalyst, to catalyze the dehydrogenative coupling between aliphatic or aromatic aldehydes and methanol. The reaction is highly selective (<99.9%) toward the formation of methyl esters over homoesters and alcohols and operates at temperatures of less than 100 C. for 2-8 hours.

Claims

1. A process for preparing esters comprising: a) combining an aldehyde having the formula R.sub.1CO with an alcohol having the formula R.sub.2OH and an iron catalyst to form a first mixture; b) heating the first mixture to form an ester having the formula R.sub.1COR.sub.2O and H.sub.2; wherein R.sub.1 is a C.sub.4 to C.sub.8 aliphatic, alicyclic or aromatic group and wherein R.sub.2 is a C.sub.1 to C.sub.4 group, and wherein said iron catalyst is represented by the structure: ##STR00013##

2. The process of claim 1 wherein R.sub.2OH is selected from the group consisting of methanol, ethanol, propanol, isopropanol, butanol, isobutanol and ethylene glycol.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein R.sub.2OH is methanol.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein step b) is conducted at a temperature of less than 100 C. for about 2 hours to about 8 hours.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein the molar ratio of R.sub.1CO to R.sub.2OH in said first mixture is from 1:1 to 1:5.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein the molar amount of catalyst in said first mixture is from about 0.25 mole percent to about 1 mole percent.

Description

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

(1) As used herein the following terms have the meaning as described below:

(2) The term M2EH refers to methyl-2-ethylhexanoate.

(3) The term TEG refers to triethylene glycol.

(4) The term TEG-2EH refers to triethylene glycol 2-ethylhexanoate.

(5) The term 2-HEH refers to 2-ethylhexaldehyde.

(6) The term MeOH refers to methanol.

(7) The term 2-EHMe refers to methyl 2-ethylhexanoate

(8) The term 2EH refers to 2-ethylhexyl alcohol.

(9) The term 2EH2EH refers to (2-ethylhexyl)2-ethylhexanoate.

(10) As used herein, the indefinite articles a and an mean one or more, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise. Similarly, the singular form of nouns includes their plural form, and vice versa, unless the context clearly suggests otherwise

(11) While attempts have been made to be precise, the numerical values and ranges described herein should be considered approximations (even when not qualified by the term about). These values and ranges may vary from their stated numbers depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention as well as the variations resulting from the standard deviation found in the measuring techniques. Moreover, the ranges described herein are intended and specifically contemplated to include all sub-ranges and values within the stated ranges. For example, a range of 0 to 100 is intended to describe and include all values within the range including sub-ranges such as 0.1-99.9, 60 to 90 and 70 to 80.

(12) We examined a reaction with 2-ethylhexaldehyde (2-HEH) and methanol (MeOH) (Table 1). In the absence of a catalyst, reacting 2-ethylhexaldehyde with excess of MeOH (5 equivalents) converted the aldehyde into a dimethyl acetal in MeOH at 90 C. No ester formation was observed under catalyst-free condition. Next, several homogeneous catalysts were screened to facilitate the formation of corresponding methyl ester (methyl 2-ethylhexanoate). These results are summarized in Table 1. Simple metal precursor complexes such as [Cp*RhCl.sub.2].sub.2, [Cp*IrCl.sub.2].sub.2, Ru.sub.3(CO).sub.12 (Cp*=1,2,3,4,5-pentamethylcyclopentadiene) failed to produce any methyl 2-ethylhexanoate (entries 1-3) and only trace amounts of 2-ethylhexyl alcohol was produced in these reactions. Ruthenium and iridium-based homogeneous dehydrogenation catalysts, supported by pincer-type ligands, also showed negligible reactivity and selectivity toward forming 2-EHMe. For example, Milstein's (PNN)Ru(H)(CO)Cl catalyst in the presence of KOH afforded 2-EHMe and 2-ethylhexylalcohol (2-EH) with a relative ratio of 1:1.2 and the overall conversion of 2-HEH reached to 22% after 6 hours at 90 C. (entry 4). The homoester of 2-HEH aldehyde, (2-ethylhexyl)2-ethylhexanoate (2EH2EH), was also formed in a considerable amount (11%) during this reaction. In addition to Milstein's catalyst, Takasago's Ru-MACHO catalyst afforded 2-EH and 2EH2EH as major products and 2-EHMe was only produced in small quantities (entry 5).

(13) ##STR00002##

(14) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Catalyst Screening Studies for 2EH-MeOH Coupling Reaction. Yield of Yield Yield 2- of of Additives EHMe 2-EH 2EH2EH Entry Catalyst (mol %) (mol %) (%) (%) (%) 1.sup.a [Cp*RhCl.sub.2].sub.2 (0.5) NaOAc(2) 0 3.1 0 2.sup.a [Cp*IrCl.sub.2].sub.2 (0.5) NaOAc(2) 0 2.2 0 3.sup.a Ru.sub.3(CO).sub.12 (0.33) 0 6.9 0 4 NaOMe(2) 2.3 13.2 11.6 5 NaOMe(2) 1.1 15.3 13.9

(15) This invention can be further illustrated by the following examples of preferred embodiments thereof, although it will be understood that these examples are included merely for purposes of illustration and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention unless otherwise specifically indicated.

EXAMPLES

(16) General Experimental Information

(17) Unless otherwise noted, all the organometallic compounds were handled under a nitrogen atmosphere using standard Schlenk and glovebox techniques. Anhydrous methanol (99.7% grade), toluene, p-xylene, Aromatic 200 and mesitylene (98%) were purchased from commercial sources and stored with 4 molecular sieves. All aldehydes were purchased from commercial sources and freshly vacuum-distilled prior to use. Other commercially available catalysts were purchased from respective commercial sources and used without further purification. .sup.1H NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance-500 MHz spectrometers. Chemical shift values in .sup.1H NMR spectra were referenced internally to the residual solvent resonances (b 7.16 for benzene-d.sub.6). Iron catalyst was prepared using the literature procedure (Scheme 1).

(18) Synthesis of Iron Catalyst (1), Scheme 3.

(19) Under a nitrogen atmosphere, a 500 mL Schlenk flask, fitted with a condensor and stir bar, was charged with iron dodecacarbonyl, tetraphenyl cyclopentadienone, and 200 mL anhydrous toluene. The resulting mixture was heated to 80 C. for 20 hours, cooled to room temperature, and mixture was passed through silica gel column to elute the desired catalyst as orange-yellow liquid. Evaporation of the solvent afforded the product in 86% isolated yield.

(20) ##STR00005##

Synthesis of methyl 2-ethylhexanoate from 2-ethylhexaldehyde

(21) Under a nitrogen atmosphere, an oven-dried 25 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir-bar and a Teflon plug was charged with the iron catalyst (1 mol %), 2-ethylhexaldehyde (2-HEH) (1.6 mL, 10 mmol), and anhydrous methanol (2 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 90 C. for 3 hours using an oil-bath. After that the vessel was gradually allowed to come to room temperature and the volatiles (H.sub.2, MeOH vapor) were carefully removed by opening the Teflon plug inside a hood. The liquid sample was analyzed by GC and GC-MS to determine the yield of methyl 2-ethylhexanoate and identify side-products.

Synthesis of methyl 2-ethylhexanoate from 2-EHenal

(22) Under a nitrogen atmosphere, an oven-dried 100 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir-bar and a Teflon plug was charged with the iron catalyst (1 mol %), 2-ethyl-2-hexenal (2EHenal) (1.57 mL, 10 mmol), and anhydrous methanol (2 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 90 C. for 3 hours using an oil-bath. After that the vessel was gradually allowed to come to room temperature and the volatiles (H.sub.2, MeOH vapor) were carefully removed by opening the Teflon plug inside the hood. The liquid sample was analyzed by GC and GC-MS to determine the yield of methyl 2-ethylhexanoate (97.8 wt %) and identify other side-products

Synthesis of methyl benzoate from benzaldehyde

(23) Under a nitrogen atmosphere, an oven-dried 100 mL Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir-bar and a Teflon plug was charged with the iron catalyst (1.0 mol %), benzalaldehyde (1.35 g, 10 mmol, 99% purity), and anhydrous methanol (2 mL). The resulting mixture was heated at 90 C. for 3 hours using an oil-bath. After that the vessel was gradually allowed to come to room temperature and the volatiles (H.sub.2, MeOH vapor) were carefully removed by opening the Teflon plug inside the hood. The liquid sample was analyzed by GC and GC-MS to determine the yield of methyl benzoate and identify other side products

(24) In summary, we have demonstrated that Shvo's catalyst catalyzes the dehydrogenative coupling between aliphatic or aromatic aldehydes and MeOH to afford corresponding methyl esters in high yields. The reaction is highly selective (up to <99.9%) toward the formation of methyl esters and operates under mild conditions (<100 C., 2-8 hours). The catalytic activity and the structure of the catalyst remain unchanged after several catalytic runs. An iron catalyst (1) shown below exhibited excellent reactivity and selectivity toward the formation of methyl esters from corresponding aldehydes via coupling with MeOH. When one equivalent of 2-EH was treated with five equivalents of MeOH at 90 C. in the presence of 1 mol % of (.sup.4-Cp.sup.Me4)Fe(CO).sub.3 catalyst (1), a mixture containing 50:45 ratio of 2-EHMe and 2-EH were formed after 3 hours (Table 2, entry 1). No starting aldehyde remained after the reaction suggesting 100% aldehyde conversion. Traces of 2EH2EH, and unsaturated 2-EH methyl ester were also produced as byproducts in this reaction. The catalytic reaction could also be carried out in non-polar aromatic solvents such as toluene, p-xylene, mesitylene and Aromatic 200 without affecting the reactivity and selectivity.

(25) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Iron-Catalyzed Synthesis of Methyl Esters from Aldehydes..sup.a entry substrate product time (h) wt % yield 1 3 50.4 2 3 89.2 3 0 3 55.7 .sup.aCatalytic Conditions: [catalyst] = 0.025 (M), [aldehyde] = 2.5 (M), MeOH = 25 mmol, 1 mL, neat conditions, stir speed = 350 rpm, 90 C. (oil-bath temperature).

(26) We have demonstrated that the iron catalyst (1) catalyzes dehydrogenative coupling between aliphatic or aromatic aldehydes and MeOH to afford corresponding methyl esters in moderate to high yields. The reaction is chemoselective toward the formation of methyl esters when substrate containing internal CC bond is employed and the reaction operates under mild conditions (<100 C., 2-8 hours). Experiments show that the catalytic activity and the structure of the catalyst (1) remain unchanged after two catalytic runs.

(27) ##STR00012##

(28) Remarkably, the coupling reaction between 2-EHenal and MeOH produced the saturated methyl 2-ethylhexanoate in 89.2% yield (Table 2, entry 2). The rest of the material accounts for unreacted 2EHenal, 2EH2EH, unsaturated esters, and 2-EH. This result indicates that the H.sub.2 gas produced during the first 2EHenal-methanol coupling step is utilized to hydrogenate the CC double bonds in the presence of the iron catalyst. This direct coupling of 2EHenal with methanol is an important discovery because it eliminates the reaction step for producing 2-HEH from 2-EHenal by hydrogenation with a heterogeneous catalyst (Scheme 1). In addition to aliphatic substrates, aromatic aldehydes such as benzaldehyde also afforded corresponding methyl esters in 56% yield. This reaction could be used for dimethyl terephthalate (DMT) synthesis using terepthaldehyde as the reagent.

(29) In the specification, there have been disclosed certain embodiments of the invention and, although specific terms are employed, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation, the scope of the invention being set forth in the following claims.