DEVICE AND METHOD FOR DETERMINING THE COMPOSITION OF AN ELECTROLYTE

Abstract

This invention relates to nonferrous metallurgy, in particular to a device and method for electrolyte composition analysis based on differential thermal measurements for aluminum electrolysis control. The device is comprised of a metal body including a reference material and an electrolyte sample receptacle, temperature sensors immersed into the reference material and in an electrolyte sample, a system for registration, data processing, and visualization of obtained results. A method includes immersing a metal body into an electrolyte; filling a receptacles with the molten electrolyte; removing and cooling down the metal body having the filled receptacle above a crust on the molten electrolyte surface; drawing and analyzing differential-thermal curves based on which the liquidus temperature, electrolyte superheating and phase and blend compositions of electrolyte solid samples are determined taking into account all crystallizing phases the content of which in the electrolyte sample is no less than 3 wt %.

Claims

1. A device for molten electrolyte composition analysis, including a metal body comprising a compartment with a reference material arranged therein and at least one electrolyte sample receptacle, temperature sensors immersed into the reference material and an electrolyte sample, a system for registration, data processing, and visualization of obtained results which is in communication with the temperature sensors, characterized in that an -modification of aluminum oxide is used as the reference material arranged within the metal body compartment.

2. The device according to claim 1, characterized in that the metal body comprises from one to four electrolyte sampling receptacles, wherein if the number of receptacles is more than one they are arranged on either side of the compartment for reference material.

3. The device according to claim 1, characterized in that thermocouples are used as temperature sensors.

4. The device according to claim 1, characterized in that a temperature sensor immersed into the reference material is protected with a corundum cover.

5. The device according to claim 1, characterized in that it comprises a metal protective tube rigidly connected to the metal body around the periphery of the reference material compartment, wherein holders and fixing members for the temperature sensors to be immersed directly into the electrolyte sampling receptacles are arranged on the tube.

6. The device according to claim 5, characterized in that electrolyte temperature sensors are arranged within the metal tube rigidly connected to the metal body, wherein the metal tube is connected, via through-channels made in the metal body, to the electrolyte sampling receptacles for enabling immersion of the temperature sensors into the electrolyte sampling receptacles.

7. A method for molten electrolyte composition analysis, including immersing a device for molten electrolyte composition analysis into an electrolyte; filling sampling receptacles with the electrolyte; removing and cooling down the device having filled receptacles; drawing and analyzing thermal and differential-thermal curves; determining the liquidus temperature, superheating and electrolyte composition, characterized in that as a device for electrolyte composition analysis a device according to claim 1 is used, when analyzing thermal and differential-thermal curves these curves are divided into peaks; a phase peak height and/or area and/or half-width is determined; a phase concentration in the electrolyte is determined based on the predetermined calibration dependence at least on one of the parameters of the phase peak; phase and blend compositions of electrolyte solid samples are determined taking into account all crystallizing phases the content of which in the electrolyte sample is no less than 3 wt %.

8. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that after electrolyte sampling, the device is cooled down above a crust on the molten electrolyte surface.

Description

[0032] The essence of the invention will be better understood upon studying following figures, where

[0033] FIGS. 1a, 1b, 1c, 1d show embodiments of a device having different number of electrolyte sampling receptacles,

[0034] FIG. 2 shows a cross-section of a device for electrolyte composition analysis having one metal protective tube,

[0035] FIG. 3 shows a cross-section of a device for electrolyte composition analysis having two metal protective tubes,

[0036] FIG. 4 schematically shows a device for electrolyte composition analysis,

[0037] FIG. 5 shows a block diagram of a data processing sequence,

[0038] FIG. 6 shows typical thermal curves of sample and reference material temperatures as a function of cooling time, and a differential-thermal curve of a sample and reference material temperature difference as a function of cooling time,

[0039] FIG. 7 shows an example of determining the arrangement of electrolyte phase crystallization peaks on a thermal curve of a sample temperature as a function of cooling time and differential-thermal curve of a sample and reference material temperature difference as a function of cooling time,

[0040] FIG. 8 shows a calibration dependence of chiolite concentration (Na.sub.5Al.sub.3F.sub.14) on its peak half-width,

[0041] FIG. 9 shows a calibration dependence of elpasolite concentration (K.sub.2NaAlF.sub.6) on its peak half-width,

[0042] FIG. 10 shows a calibration dependence of cryolite concentration (Na.sub.3AlF.sub.6) on its peak half-width,

[0043] FIG. 11 shows a calibration dependence of the concentration of Ca-containing phases (CaNaAlF.sub.6 and Na.sub.7Ca.sub.3Al.sub.2F.sub.14) on their peak half-width.

[0044] A device consists of following main components (FIG. 1, 2): a metal body 1, a metal protective tube 2 on which a thermocouple holder 3 and an electrolyte sample thermocouple fixing member 4 are arranged. The metal tube 2 comprises fixturing elements 5. Inside the metal body, there is a compartment for a reference material 6 on either side of which electrolyte receptacles 7 are located. The metal body 1 and the tube 2 are rigidly interconnected by means of a welded connection. The device comprises a thermocouple 8 immersed into an electrolyte sample receptacle and a thermocouple 9 placed into a corundum cover 10 placed within the compartment for reference material. It should be noted that other alternative designs of the device differ by the presence of additional electrolyte receptacles and additional holders and fixing members for a thermocouple immersed into an electrolyte sample receptacle. Moreover (FIG. 3), thermocouples, which register electrolyte sample 8 temperature, can be arranged inside a metal tube 11 and can extend into the electrolyte sample receptacle via a through-channel 12. All structural elements of the device are made of the same materialheat-resistant steel.

[0045] Fixturing elements 5 are used to attach the device (FIG. 4) to a holder 13, which is used to immerse said device into the electrolyte and to control its immersion depth. The temperature sensors of the device communicate with a system for registration, data processing, and visualization of obtained results comprised of a digital temperature meter 15 and a tablet computer 16 by means of connectors 14. The digital temperature meter records the time dependencies of electrolyte and reference material temperatures. The digital temperature meter communicates via USB and/or Wi-Fi channels with the computer 16, preferably being the tablet computer, that performs data processing and imaging the measurement results.

[0046] When taking measurements, the metal body 1 according to any of the device embodiments (FIGS. 1-3) is immersed into the electrolyte, as a result of which the melt fills the electrolyte sampling receptacles 7. The metal body is held in the melt until the readings of thermocouples within the electrolyte sample 8 and the reference material 9 become equal, and then it is removed from the melt. Immersion of the device metal body into the electrolyte and its removal therefrom, as well as immersion depth control, are performed with the help of the holder 13. The device metal body is cooled down above the crust on the electrolyte surface, thus, making it possible to obtain more distinct electrolyte phase crystallization peaks by reducing device cooling rate and excluding the influence of external conditions on the measurement results. At the time of cooling down, time dependencies of electrolyte and reference material temperatures are registered using a measuring system including the digital temperature meter 15 communicated with the tablet computer 16. The device metal body cools down to the temperature below the electrolyte solidus temperature. Once measurements are taken, the device metal body is immersed into the melt where it is held until the melt temperature is achieved, following which the device is removed from the melt and the electrolyte sample is poured out. Studies show that for accurate data at least three cooling curves must be registered. The number of device immersions into an electrolyte is defined based on the device metal body design.

[0047] Once measurements are finished, the thermal curve of sample temperature as a function of cooling time ((T.sub.2, T.sub.3, T.sub.4)=f()) and the differential-thermal curve of a sample and reference material temperature difference as a function of cooling time ((T)=f()) are drawn. In order to evaluate phase content in an electrolyte sample, a phase crystallization temperature on the thermal curve and respective peaks on the differential-thermal curve should be determined and the measurement results should be compared with X-ray phase analysis results. After that calibration, dependencies of the peak parameters (half-width/area/height) on respective phase contents shall be plotted. Plotted calibration dependencies are used to determine the phase content in samples of an electrolyte the content of which is within the boundaries of the content of calibration samples.

[0048] Method sensitivity is limited by the phase concentration in an electrolyte and is no less than 3 wt %. If a phase concentration in an electrolyte is less than 3 wt %, it becomes difficult to identify this phase because a phase peak on the differential-thermal curve is not observed.

[0049] Processing of measurement results includes following operations (FIG. 5):

[0050] 1. Dependencies plotting (T, T.sub.2, T.sub.2, T.sub.3, T.sub.4)=f().

[0051] 2. Division of obtained dependencies into peaks corresponding to electrolyte phases.

[0052] 3. Determining of each phase peak parameters (height and/or area and/or half-width of a phase peak).

[0053] 4. Determining of each phase peak concentration in electrolyte based on the calibration dependency on one of the phase peak parameters.

[0054] 5. Determining of phase and blend compositions of electrolyte solid samples taking into account all crystallizing phases the content of which in the electrolyte sample is no less than 3 wt %.

[0055] A method for electrolyte composition analysis includes following steps.

[0056] 1. Immersing a device metal body into an electrolyte melt and its holding herein until electrolyte sample and reference material temperatures become equal.

[0057] 2. Removing the device metal body having receptacles filled with electrolyte samples from the melt and its cooling down above the electrolyte crust up to the temperature below the melt solidus temperature according to a thermocouple registering the temperature in the electrolyte sample.

[0058] 3. Registering time dependencies of electrolyte and reference material cooling down.

[0059] 4. Repeating the immersion of the device metal body into the melt for electrolyte washing out.

[0060] 5. Analyzing obtained differential-thermal curves in order to determine the liquidus temperature, the electrolyte superheating value, and electrolyte phase crystallization temperatures.

[0061] 6. Determining electrolyte phase and blend compositions.

[0062] The implementation of the claimed method is supported by examples.

EXAMPLE 1

[0063] For electrolytes of the NaFAlF.sub.3KFCaF.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 system having a molar ratio NaF/AlF.sub.3 (cryolite ratio) which comprise no less than 4 wt % of potassium fluoride and 4 wt % of calcium fluoride, the main electrolyte phases are cryolite, elpasolite, chiolite, calcium-containing combinations, and alumina (Al.sub.2O.sub.3). All measurements were taken with a device comprising one electrolyte sample receptacle. Time of device cooling above the crust on the electrolyte surface was 8 min, accordingly, the average cooling rate was 50 deg/min. In addition, measurements were taken with a device comprising three electrolyte sample receptacles. Time of device cooling above the crust on the electrolyte surface was 11 min, accordingly, the average cooling rate was 36 deg/min. The typical curves obtained based on the measurements are shown in FIG. 6.

[0064] When analyzing the registered differential-thermal and thermal curves, positions of five peaks on the differential-thermal curve and respective peaks on the thermal curve were determined and the measurement results were compared with the X-ray phase analysis results (FIG. 6). The phase crystallization temperature was determined based on a projection onto the temperature curve of the straight-line portion start (a drop) on the differential-thermal curve of a sample and reference material temperature difference as a function of time. In addition, it is possible to use a combined representation of measurement results, which is a dependency of a sample, and reference material temperature difference on the electrolyte temperature. Once electrolyte phase crystallization temperatures had been determined, the liquidus and solidus temperatures and the electrolyte superheating value were determined.

[0065] Once electrolyte phase crystallization temperatures in the given electrolyte composition had been determined, a half-width of each phase peak was determined on the differential-thermal curve. To analyze an electrolyte composition the calibration dependencies between phase concentrations in the electrolyte and a half-width of a corresponding peak are used. Examples of these dependencies for the NaFAlF.sub.3KFCaF.sub.2Al.sub.2O.sub.3 system are illustrated in FIGS. 7-11. Once the electrolyte phase composition had been determined, its blend composition and a cryolite melt ratio value were estimated. Tables 1-4 illustrate main electrolyte phases obtained by X-ray phase analysis (XRA) and by analysis of differential-thermal curves according to the claimed method (DTA). In addition, these tables illustrate average deviation values (ad) between analysis results and a mean-square deviation value (MSD).

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Cryolite concentration, wt % Deviation DTA XRA 27.5 27.2 +0.3 29.3 29.1 +0.2 20.3 20.9 0.6 17.6 17.4 +0.2 19.4 19.7 0.3 29.3 30 0.7 23.9 24.1 0.2 ad 0.16 MSD 0.4

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Elpasolite concentration, wt % Deviation DTA XRA 5.3 5.3 0 6.0 5.9 +0.1 7.1 7.2 0.1 7.9 7.9 0 9.3 9.2 +0.1 9.7 9.7 0 10.1 10 +0.1 10.4 10.3 +0.1 10.8 10.8 0 9 9 0 ad 0.03 MSD 0.07

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Ca-containing phase concentration, wt % Deviation DTA XRA 8.3 8.3 0 8.6 8.4 +0.2 8.3 8.3 0 8.6 8.5 +0.1 8.9 8.7 +0.2 8.9 8.8 +0.1 7.7 7.8 +0.1 8 8 0 9.2 9.1 +0.1 9.4 9.3 +0.1 ad 0.09 MSD 0.074

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Chiolite concentration, wt % Deviation DTA XRA 45.0 45.1 0.1 47.3 47.0 +0.3 52.6 53.1 0.5 57.4 57.7 0.3 58.3 58.2 +0.1 58.4 59.1 0.7 60.1 60.3 0.2 60.3 61.3 1.0 63.2 62.8 +0.4 68.8 68.1 +0.7 68.7 69.4 0.7 69.9 69.7 +0.2 70.4 70.6 0.2 71.5 72.4 0.9 71.8 72.2 0.4 68.5 67.8 +0.7 68.9 68 +0.1 62.9 61.5 +1.4 64.9 65 0.1 61.6 60.5 +1.1 ad 0.005 MSD 0.643

[0066] Table 5 illustrates data for phase and blend compositions obtained by X-ray phase analysis and by analysis of differential-thermal curves according to the claimed method. Compositions 1-4 were determined using a device having one electrolyte sampling receptacle; compositions 5-7 were determined using a device having three electrolyte sampling receptacles. It can be seen that the mean-square deviation value of analysis results is no more than 0.892. Accordingly, the claimed device and a method provide a reasonable determination of electrolyte phase and blend compositions.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Comparison of phase and blend compositions obtained by different methods Composition 1 Composition 2 Composition 3 Composition 4 DTA XRA DTA XRA DTA XRA DTA XRA Cryolite 25.7 25.1 0.6 14.5 14.6 0.1 29.3 29.1 0.2 17.6 17.8 0.2 Elpasolite 10.8 10.8 0 9.7 9.9 0.2 9.0 9 0 8.2 8.2 0 Ca-phases 8.9 9 0.1 8.9 8.7 0.2 9.4 9.3 0.14 9.4 9.4 0 Chiolite 48.3 47.9 0.4 60.1 60.3 0.24 46.2 45.8 0.4 58.3 58.8 0.5 KF 6.1 6.16 0.06 5.48 6.01 0.53 5.07 5.26 0.19 4.65 4.9 0.25 CaF.sub.2 4.6 4.26 0.34 4.6 4.42 0.18 4.91 4.68 0.23 4.91 4.6 0.31 NaF 41.56 41.16 0.4 40.04 40.4 0.36 42.91 42.31 0.6 41.21 41.3 0.09 AlF.sub.3 46.16 45.67 0.49 47.79 48.42 0.63 46.01 45.49 0.52 47.75 47.88 0.13 KO 1.8 1.79 0.01 1.68 1.66 0.02 1.87 1.85 0.02 1.73 1.72 0.01 Composition 5 Composition 6 Composition 7 Deviation DTA XRA DTA XRA DTA XRA ad MSD Cryolite 19.4 19.4 0 20.3 20.1 0.2 19.4 19.5 0.1 0.086 0.273 Elpasolite 9.3 9.3 0 9.0 9.1 0.1 9.0 8.8 0.20 0.014 0.121 Ca-phases 9.4 9.4 0 9.7 9.9 0.2 9.7 9.2 0.5 0.071 0.229 Chiolite 56.3 56.2 0.1 55.8 55.2 0.6 54.8 56.8 2.0 0.171 0.892 KF 5.27 5.35 0.08 5.07 5.25 0.18 5.07 5.11 0.04 0.19 0.169 CaF.sub.2 4.91 4.61 0.3 5.06 4.78 0.28 5.06 4.53 0.53 0.31 0.111 NaF 41.41 41.37 0.04 41.76 41.27 0.49 40.68 41.47 0.79 0.041 0.502 AlF.sub.3 47.76 47.46 0.3 47.84 47.18 0.66 46.91 47.47 0.56 0.093 0.533 KO 1.73 1.74 0.01 1.75 1.74 0.01 1.74 1.74 0 0.009 0.011