USE OF RECOMBINANT ONCOLYTIC TYPE II HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS IN PREPARING MEDICINES AGAINST LYMPHOMA, ESOPHAGEAL CANCER, BREAST CANCER AND PANCREATIC CANCER

Abstract

The present invention discloses a use of recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus in preparing medicines against lymphoma, esophageal cancer, breast cancer and pancreatic cancer. The recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus can specifically grow and reproduce in human tumor cells, without affecting the proliferation of normal cells, thus it can effectively kill cancer cells, presenting good effect. These new indications provide more evidences for drug development and utilization with the recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus.

Claims

1. A method for treating Lymphoma, comprising administering an effective amount of a recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus, which deletes genes ICP34.5 and ICP47 of the wild type II herpes simplex virus HG52 strain.

2. A method for treating esophageal cancer, comprising administering an effective amount of a recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus, which deletes genes ICP34.5 and ICP47 of the wild type II herpes simplex virus HG52 strain.

3. A method for treating breast cancer, comprising administering an effective amount of a recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus, which deletes genes ICP34.5 and ICP47 of the wild type II herpes simplex virus HG52 strain.

4. A method for treating pancreatic cancer, comprising administering an effective amount of a recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus, which deletes genes ICP34.5 and ICP47 of the wild type II herpes simplex virus HG52 strain.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0010] FIG. 1 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter of the right tumor after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing mice of A20 mouse lymphoma models.

[0011] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the change in tumor diameter of the left tumor after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing mice of A20 mouse lymphoma models.

[0012] FIG. 3 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing mice of 4T1 mouse breast cancer models.

[0013] FIG. 4 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing nude mice of MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer models.

[0014] FIG. 5 is a diagram showing comparison of tumor diameters after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing SCID mice of EC 109 esophageal cancer models.

[0015] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing nude mice of MiaPaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer models.

[0016] FIG. 7 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing mice of B16 mouse melanoma models.

[0017] FIG. 8 is a diagram showing changes in tumor diameter after injection of oHSV2 in tumor-bearing nude mice of SNK-6 human NKT lymphoma models.

[0018] FIG. 9 is a diagram showing comparison of virus titers after oHSV2 infection of four tumor cells.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

[0019] The invention is further described in detail below in conjunction with specific embodiments. The methods used in the following embodiments are conventional methods unless otherwise specified, and the primer synthesis and sequencing are carried out by Shanghai Sangon Biotech.

Embodiment 1 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) Against Lymphoma

[0020] A20 mouse B cell lymphoma cells were injected subcutaneously into the bilateral flanks at a dose of 210.sup.6, to induce 20 female BALB/c mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the right flank tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Schedule of injecting virus into A20 tumor-bearing mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0021] As shown in FIG. 1, after three times of injections of the virus in the right flank tumor, the tumor in the treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.59 cm and 0 cm, respectively. There was significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group (p<0.01).

[0022] Similarly, as shown in FIG. 2, the virus also showed a good anti-tumor effect on the tumor on the non-treatment side (left flank). On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.54 cm and 0.4 cm, respectively. The diameter of the left tumor in the treatment group was significantly different from that in the control group (p<0.05).

Embodiment 2 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus Against Breast Cancer

[0023] (1) Antitumor effect of recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus (oHSV2) against mouse breast cancer (4T1)

[0024] 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 110.sup.6, to induce 20 female BALB/c mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Schedule of injecting virus into 4T1 tumor-bearing mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0025] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.83 cm and 0.87 cm, respectively. There was significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group (p<0.05). The results were shown in FIG. 3.

[0026] (2) Antitumor effect of recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus (oHSV2) against human breast cancer (MDA-MB-231)

[0027] MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 110.sup.6, to induce 20 female BALB/c nude mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Schedule of injecting virus into MDA-MB-231 tumor-bearing nude mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0028] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.24 cm and 0.21 cm, respectively. There was significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group (p<0.01). The results were shown in FIG. 4.

Embodiment 3 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) Against Esophageal Cancer

[0029] EC109 human esophageal cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 110.sup.6, to induce 20 female SCID mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule of three injections of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Schedule of injecting virus into EC 109 tumor-bearing SCID mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0030] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.64 cm and 0.14 cm, respectively. There was significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group (p<0.01). The results were shown in FIG. 5.

Embodiment 4 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) Against Pancreatic Cancer

[0031] MiaPaCa-2 human pancreatic cancer cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 110.sup.6, to induce 20 female nude mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Schedule of injecting virus into MiaPaCa-2 tumor-bearing nude mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0032] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.45 cm and 0.47 cm, respectively. There was significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group (p<0.05). The results were shown in FIG. 6.

Comparative Example 1 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) Against Mouse B16 Melanoma (B16)

[0033] B16 melanoma cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 210.sup.5, to induce 20 female C57/BL mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 6 Schedule of injecting virus into B16 tumor-bearing mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0034] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was not significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.44 cm and 1.50 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group. As shown in FIG. 7, the recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus (oHSV2) had no significant anti-tumor effect on mouse B16 melanoma (B16).

Comparative Example 2 Antitumor Effect of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) Against Human NKT Lymphoma (SNK-6)

[0035] SNK-6 human NKT lymphoma cells were injected subcutaneously into the right flank at a dose of 210.sup.6, to induce 20 female BALB/c nude mice (10 animals per group) to produce tumors. The schedule for three times of injection of virus in the tumor was shown in the table below.

TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 7 Schedule of injecting virus into SNK-6 tumor-bearing nude mice Virus Virus Virus Number of Titer Dosage Injection Group Animals per (CCID50/ (CCID50/ Time No. Group Virus ml) animal) (days) 1 10 oHSV2 2 10.sup.7 1 10.sup.6 1, 4, 7 2 10 Control 1, 4, 7 (serum-free medium)

[0036] After three times of injections of the virus in the tumor, the tumor size of the virus treatment group was not significantly smaller than that in the control group. On the 28.sup.th day after the first injection of the virus, the mean tumor diameters of the control group and the virus treatment group were 1.80 cm and 1.72 cm, respectively. There was no significant difference in tumor diameter between the treatment group and the control group. As shown in FIG. 8, the recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus (oHSV2) had no significant anti-tumor effect on human NKT lymphoma (SNK-6).

Experimental Example 1 Growth Curve of Recombinant Oncolytic Type II Herpes Simplex Virus (oHSV2) in Four Cell Lines

[0037] The cells used in the experiment included the following four types: Vero cells-African green monkey kidney cells, B16 cells-mouse melanoma cells, SNK-6 cells-human NKT lymphoma cells, and CT26 cells-mouse colon cancer cells.

[0038] Experimental procedure: Four kinds of cells were paved on culture plates. When the cell confluence reached 90% or more, cells were infected with oHSV2 virus at MOI=0.01, and the virus titers were detected at the times points of 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 16 h, 24 h, 48 h and 72 h respectively.

[0039] As shown in FIG. 9, the virus proliferated significantly in Vero cells, and the virus titer began to rise rapidly at 8 hours after infection, slowly rose after 24 hours, and reached the peak at 48 hours (1 g 6.3 CCID50/ml). The virus proliferated in CT-26 cells, and the virus titer reached 1 g 3.97 CCID50/ml after 24 hours and maintained until 72 hours. The viruses did not proliferate in B16 cells and SNK-6 cells.

[0040] Result Analysis:

[0041] Vero cells: African green monkey kidney cells, herpes simplex virus (HSV) sensitive cells, after infected in Vero cells, HSV proliferated to achieve a high titer.

[0042] B16 cells: Mouse melanoma cells, HSV non-sensitive cells, did not support HSV replication, so oHSV2 could not kill B16 cells.

[0043] SNK-6 cells: Human NKT lymphoma cells, HSV non-sensitive cells, did not support HSV replication, so oHSV2 could not kill SNK-6 cells.

[0044] CT26 cells: Mouse colon cancer cells, HSV semi-sensitive cells, HSV proliferated in this cell, but its titer was low.

CONCLUSION

[0045] Since B16 and SNK-6 cells lack viral receptors, oHSV2 virus cannot proliferate in both cells. Therefore, the recombinant oncolytic type II herpes simplex virus (oHSV2) does not produce an oncolytic and anti-tumor effect on all tumors.