Method for detecting a dengue infection
11561218 · 2023-01-24
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
Y02A50/30
GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
International classification
G01N33/50
PHYSICS
Abstract
The invention relates to a method for detecting a dengue infection in a patient blood sample, comprising the steps: a) Performing an analysis of prespecified parameters of blood platelets and prespecified types of blood cells in the sample and determining parameter values for the prespecified parameters of the platelets and the prespecified types of cells; b) Obtaining sample parameters from the values determined in step a); and c) Evaluating the sample parameters in relation to a prespecified criterion, wherein, if the criterion is fulfilled, a dengue infection is present.
Claims
1. A method for detecting a dengue infection in a patient blood sample, comprising the steps of: a) performing a platelet volumes analysis in the sample and determining a distribution of the platelet volumes; b) determining a percentage of Perox cells in the sample with absorption values greater than a predefined limit; c) determining a mean value in a Y direction in a scatter diagram of a Polymorphonucleocyte (PMN) in the sample; d) determininge a mean platelet concentration (MPC) in the sample; e) obtaining sample parameters from values determined in steps a)-d); and f) evaluating the sample parameters in relation to a prespecified criterion, wherein, if the criterion is fulfilled, a dengue infection is present.
2. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein higher values of parameters determined in d) of claim 1, or higher values of parameters determined in c) of claim 1 are predicative for the presence of a dengue infection.
3. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein: values of a parameter determined in a) of claim 1 smaller than 0.758244×10.sup.3 cells per μL and values of a parameter determined in b) of claim 1 smaller than 0.126523 percent and values of a parameter determined in d) of claim 1 larger than 26.9465 grams per dL are predicative for the presence of a dengue infection or values of the parameter determined in a) of claim 1 larger than 0.758244×10.sup.3 cells per μL and values of a parameter determined in c) of claim 1 larger than 11.2002 are predicative for the presence of a dengue infection.
4. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the sample parameters are determined by scattered light measurements.
5. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the dengue infection involves an infection with dengue virus serotype DEN-1, DEN-2, DEN-3 or DEN-4.
6. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determination of the distribution of the platelet volumes in a) of claim 1 comprises fitting of the platelet volumes to a log-normal distribution.
7. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determination of the distribution of the platelet volumes in a) of claim 1 comprises determining the standard deviation of the distribution of the platelet volumes.
8. The method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the determination of the distribution of the platelet volumes in a) of claim 1 comprises determining the standard deviation of the log-normal distribution.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) Embodiments of the inventive method are also described in greater detail below, which refer to the enclosed figures, in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(8) First, training data (20) is obtained. Here, patient samples which were positive for any serotype of the dengue virus were obtained from laboratories in India. Data were not subdivided according to serotype as the purpose of this invention is not to discriminate between strains of dengue, but rather to alert to the presence of the virus.
(9) Second, relevant feature vectors (21) from the patient samples are extracted. The samples were measured with an ADVIA 2120i Hematology System from SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS GMBH. The ADVIA 2120i instrument can produce over 400 results. Out of those features, statistical analysis was carried out to determine which features were significantly different between dengue and non-dengue patient samples. The features that showed a significant difference (p<0.05 after correction) were selected to train a classifier.
(10) Third, the classifier is trained to distinguish between positive and negative patient samples based on the selected features. The classification method chosen here was the decision tree for classification. The classification tree model was trained by using a greedy algorithm that splits the dataset based on a feature and calculates how well the resultant split classified the data into positive and negative patient samples. The classification algorithm (22) runs over all features at different split values/combinations and only retains those features which provide the highest predictive capability. Those features that do not provide any additional predictive power are discarded. The classification algorithm (22) used in this case was the standard Classification and Regression Tree predictor-splitting algorithm as implemented in MATLAB.
(11) Fourth, the resulting predictive model to diagnose future unknown patients' samples is stored. The predictive model (23) is the algorithm that will ultimately identify those samples that are dengue positive in unknown cases. A visualization of two different models (classification trees to identify dengue positive blood samples) is shown in
(12) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Description of parameters and units. Parameter (Feature Name) Description Units Valid Number of cells detected passing through Cell count Perox the flowcell from the perox channel. Cells RBC The reported Red Blood Cell count. 10.sup.6 cells/μL PDW Platelet distribution width (standard % deviation divided by percentage mean). Neut X The located mean of the neutrophil cluster Scaled to 0-99 Mean on the x axis. Neut Y The located mean of the neutrophil cluster Scaled to 0-99 Mean on the y axis. rcount The raw Red Cell count on a Red Blood Cell Cell count channel. Micro Percentage of RBC cells with volume less % Percent than 60 fL.
(13) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Description of parameters and units. Parameter (Feature Name) Description Units pltSigma Platelet volumes are fitted to a log-normal 10.sup.3 cells/μL distribution. Platelet Sigma (pltSigma) is the standard deviation of this distribution. Percent Percent High Absorption % High (Percent_high_absorption) is the Absorption percentage of (Perox) cells with absorption values greater than a predefined limit (97). PMN Y PMN Y peak (PMN_Y_peak) is the Scaled to 0-49 peak mean value in the Y direction of the Polymorphonucleocyte (PMN) cluster. MPC Mean Platelet Concentration grams/dL
(14) The ADVIA 2120 produces a cytogram based on essentially how much a cell scatters light. Every cell has a scatter high value (the low angle scattered light, see, e.g.,
(15) The models generated to identify dengue virus are as follows: Each node in the decision trees shown in
(16) These models were trained on a set of 1585 patient samples. In order to prevent overfitting, cross validation was carried out by partitioning the data into 5 sets, 4 of which were used to train the model and 1 used to validate. This was carried out 5 times for each subset to test the model and the results averaged. Ten percent (10%) of the data was also held out of the analysis entirely, in order to judge the resulting model on data it had never seen before.
(17) The performance of the models yielded a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 90% (model shown in
(18) The inventive method enables on the basis of the prespecified criterions as determined above, the evaluation of the determined parameters, and a prediction of a dengue infection with high specificity and sensitivity using standard Hematology Systems.
LIST OF REFERENCE CHARACTERS
(19) 1 Facility for flow cytometry 2 Laser 3 Sensor module 4 Optical lenses 5 Semi-transparent mirror 6 Aperture 7 Mirror 8 Sensor 9 Sensor 10 Sensor 11 Cell 20 Training data 21 Feature vectors 22 Classification algorithm 23 Model P Positive N Negative