Method for Adapting UV Cell Pathlength in a Chromatography System

Abstract

The present invention relates to a method for determining operational status of a chromatography column (1; 39, 47, 59; 107, 109, 111, 113), comprising detecting a feed signal (21; 201) representative of the composition of a feed material provided to the inlet of the column; detecting the UV absorbance in the feed material, detecting an effluent signal (23; 203, 205, 207, 209) representative of the composition of the effluent from the column; and using the feed signal and the effluent signal to determine operational status of the column. The feed signal is generated using a first UV detector having a first UV cell pathlength operating at a first UV wavelength and in the effluent signal is generated using a second UV detector having a second UV cell pathlength operating at a second UV wavelength. The method further comprising determining a first threshold value based on the detected UV absorbance in the feed material, and selecting the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength based on the first threshold value.

Claims

1. A method for determining operational status of a chromatography column, comprising: detecting a feed signal representative of the composition of a feed material provided to the inlet of the column; detecting the UV absorbance in the feed material, detecting an effluent signal representative of the composition of the effluent from the column; using the feed signal and the effluent signal to determine operational status of the column, wherein the feed signal is generated using a first UV detector having a first UV cell pathlength operating at a first UV wavelength and the effluent signal is generated using a second UV detector having a second UV cell pathlength operating at a second UV wavelength, the method further comprising: determining a first threshold value based on the detected UV absorbance in the feed material, and selecting the first UV cell pathlength and/or first wavelength based on the first threshold value.

2. The method according to claim 1, characterised by continuously determining the operational status of the column during the chromatography process.

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising using the feed signal and the effluent signal to determine a deltasignal being the feed signal minus the effluent signal and a deltasignalmax being the feed signal minus the effluent signal when the effluent signal shows a plateau due to the fact that substantially all non-binding components have passed the column.

4. The method according to claim 3, comprising compensating for a time delay when determining the deltasignal and the deltasignalmax, said time delay representing the time it takes for a non-binding component to pass the column.

5. The method according to claim 3, comprising using the deltasignal to determine a breakthrough point (c) and/or a saturation point (d) of the column, said breakthrough point and saturation point being calculated as a respective certain predefined percentage of the deltasignalmax.

6. The method according to claim 1, comprising detecting an effluent signal from each chromatography column in a periodic counter current, PCC, system and using these effluent signals together with the feed signal to continuously determine operational status of the different chromatography columns of the PCC system during the chromatography process.

7. The method according to claim 1, wherein the feed material comprises: impurities, resulting in background absorbance when measured in the first UV detector, and product, resulting in an absorbance level of the product in the feed material when measured in the first UV detector, wherein the absorbance level of the product is at least forty percent of the background absorbance of the feed material.

8. The method according to claim 7, wherein the absorbance level of the product in the feed material is higher than the background absorbance.

9. The method according to claim 8, wherein the absorbance level of the product in the feed material is 70%-90% of the absorbance measured in the first UV detector.

10. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of selecting the first UV cell pathlength comprises: selecting a fixed UV cell pathlength from a plurality of pre-selected UV cell pathlengths, or adjusting the UV cell pathlength.

11. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of selecting the first UV wavelength comprises adjusting the first UV wavelength.

12. The method according to claim 10, wherein the step of selecting the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength is performed until the first UV detector is within a linear range of detection.

13. The method according to claim 1, wherein the step of determining the first threshold value comprises: estimating maximum UV absorbance in feed material, and selecting the first threshold value to ensure that the estimated maximum UV absorbance in the feed material is detectable in the first UV detector.

14. The method according to claim 13, wherein the method further comprises calculating UV absorbance of the feed material, and the step of estimating maximum UV absorbance is based on the calculated UV absorbance.

15. The method according to claim 13, wherein the method further comprises measuring the UV absorbance of the feed material, and the step of estimating maximum UV absorbance is based on the measured UV absorbance.

16. The method according to claim 15, wherein the method further comprises continuously measuring the UV absorbance of the feed material, and selecting the first threshold value based on changes in UV absorbance.

17. The method according to claim 16, wherein the step of selecting the first threshold value is performed when the change in UV absorbance is more than a pre-determined percentage compared to the first threshold value, the pre-determined percentage is 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15% or 20%.

18. The method according to claim 1, comprising detecting the UV absorbance in the effluent, wherein the method further comprising: determining a second threshold value based on the detected UV absorbance in the effluent and/or the first threshold value, and selecting the second UV cell pathlength and/or second UV wavelength based on the second threshold value.

19. The method according to claim 18, wherein the second threshold value is lower or equal to the first threshold value.

20. The method according to claim 18, wherein the step of determining the second threshold value comprises: estimating UV absorbance for a selected breakthrough point in the effluent, and selecting the second threshold value to ensure that the estimated UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point is detectable in the second UV detector.

21. The method according to claim 20, wherein the method further comprises calculating UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point, and the step of estimating UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point in the effluent is based on the calculated UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point.

22. The method according to claim 20, wherein the method further comprises measuring the UV absorbance in the effluent, and the step of estimating UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point is based on the measured UV absorbance.

23. The method according to claim 18, wherein the method further comprises selecting the second UV cell pathlength to be equal to the first UV cell pathlength.

24. The method according to claim 18, wherein the step of selecting the second UV cell pathlength comprises: selecting a fixed UV cell pathlength from a plurality of pre-selected UV cell pathlengths, or adjusting the UV cell pathlength.

25. The method according to claim 18, wherein the step of selecting the second UV wavelength comprises adjusting the second UV wavelength.

26. The method according to claim 24, wherein the step of selecting the second UV cell pathlength and/or second UV wavelength is performed until the second UV detector is within a linear range of detection.

27. The method according to claim 23, wherein the method further comprises: when the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength is changed, applying a time delay corresponding to a residence time in the column before the second UV cell pathlength and/or UV wavelength is changed.

28. A method for controlling a chromatography system comprising at least one column, comprising the steps of: determining operational status of the at least one chromatography column according to claim 1; and controlling the start and stop of the different chromatography process steps according to the determined operational status.

29. The method according to claim 28, characterized by continuously determining the operational status during the chromatography process and in real time controlling the start and stop of the different chromatography process steps according to the determined operational status.

30. A method for controlling a periodic counter current chromatography system comprising at least two columns comprising the steps of: detecting a feed signal representative of the composition of a feed material provided to the inlet of the columns; detecting effluent signals representative of the composition of the effluent from each column in the system; determining the operational status of each chromatography column according to claim 1; and controlling the feed to and between the columns in dependence of the determined operational status.

31. The method according to claim 30, characterized by continuously determining the operational status during the chromatography process and in real time controlling the feed to and between the columns in dependence of the determined operational status.

32. The method according to claim 30, comprising controlling the flow rates for the feed and buffer pumps in dependence of the determined operational status.

33. The method according to claim 30, comprising compensating for any differences in the different column properties and/or flow rates by adjusting for how long, and in which position, different columns should be in the loading zone according to the determined operational status.

34. A method of separating a protein from a harvested cell culture fluid (HCCF), the method comprising feeding the HCCF into a continuous chromatography system comprising at least two columns, the system comprising a first UV detector upstream said columns and a second UV detector downstream the column receiving the HCCF and wherein the system is arranged to compare UV signals registered by the first and second UV sensors to provide a delta UV response indicative of breakthrough of protein through the column, each UV detector having a UV pathlength operating at a UV wavelength, and the system is arranged to switch the feed of HCCF to a different column when the delta UV signal reach a predetermined breakthrough point , wherein the pathlength of the UV detector is in the range 0.05-2 mm, the breakthrough point is in the range 5-90% delta UV response when the UV wavelength is in the range 280-300, and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/l.

35. The method according to claim 34, wherein the protein is selected to be monoclonal antibody.

36. The method according to claim 35, wherein the method comprises adjusting , when initial signal of HCCF is greater than 3.0 AU, the UV cell pathlength and/or UV wavelength until a linear signal is obtained.

37. The method according to claim 36, wherein adjusting UV cell pathlength and/or UV wavelength is performed until the UV signal is below 2.5 AU.

38. The method according to claim 34, wherein the continuous chromatography system is selected from the group: periodic counter current chromatography, simulated moving bed chromatography, continuous counter-current tangential chromatography, and sequential multi-column continuous chromatography.

39. The method according to claim 34, wherein background absorbance is less than 2.0 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 31 g/L, the method comprises selecting the pathlength to be 2.0 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm.

40. The method according to claim 39, wherein the pathlength is selected to be between 0.05-0.35 mm.

41. The method according to claim 34, wherein background absorbance is less than 2.1 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/L, the method comprises selecting the pathlength to be 1.0 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm.

42. The method according to claim 41, wherein the pathlength is selected to be between 0.05-0.20 mm.

43. The method according to claim 34, wherein background absorbance is less than 2.0 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 26 g/L, the method comprises selecting the pathlength to be 0.5 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm.

44. The method according to claim 34, wherein background absorbance is less than 1.2Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/L, the method comprises selecting the pathlength to be 2 mm, and the wavelength to be 300 nm.

45. A chromatography system comprising at least one chromatography column, the chromatography system is configured to: determine operational status of the at least one chromatography column according to claim 1; and control the start and stop of the different chromatography process steps according to the determined operational status.

46. The chromatography system according to claim 45, further configured to: continuously determine the operational status during the chromatography process, and in real time control the start and stop of the different chromatography process steps according to the determined operational status.

47. A periodic counter current chromatography system comprising at least two columns, the periodic current chromatography system is configured to: detect a feed signal representative of the composition of a feed material provided to the inlet of the columns; detect effluent signals representative of the composition of the effluent from each column in the system; determine the operational status of each chromatography column according to claim 1; and control the feed to and between the columns in dependence of the determined operational status.

48. The periodic counter current chromatography system according to claim 47, further configured to: continuously determine the operational status during the chromatography process; and in real time control the feed to and between the columns in dependence of the determined operational status.

49. The periodic counter current chromatography system according to claim 47, further configured to control the flow rates for the feed and buffer pumps in dependence of the determined operational status.

50. The periodic counter current chromatography system according to claim 47, further configured to compensate for any differences in the different column properties and/or flow rates by adjusting for how long, and in which position, different columns should be in the loading zone according to the determined operational status.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] FIG. 1 shows schematically a chromatography system comprising one chromatography column and two detectors.

[0019] FIG. 2 is a diagram showing the signals from the two detectors in FIG. 1.

[0020] FIG. 3 shows schematically a three column periodic counter current (3C-PCC) system comprising four detectors.

[0021] FIGS. 4a, b, and c shows schematically three valves of FIG. 3.

[0022] FIG. 5 shows schematically a four column periodic counter current (4C-PCC) system according to the invention.

[0023] FIG. 6 is a diagram showing the signals detected from the five detectors in the 4C-PCC system shown in FIG. 5.

[0024] FIG. 7 illustrates a schematic of a typical flow cell absorption monitor system.

[0025] FIGS. 8A to 8C show a schematic optical flow cell detector.

[0026] FIGS. 9A and 9B show a schematic view of a PCC system FIG. 10 shows a schematic view of dynamic control function in a PCC system

[0027] FIGS. 11A and 11B show antibody breakthrough for 0.5 mm versus 2 mm UV cell pathlength

[0028] FIGS. 12A-12D show UV absorbance as a function of UV cell pathlength

[0029] FIGS. 13A-13D show chromatography of protein loading

[0030] FIGS. 14A-14D show yield data and quality data for the FNVIP pools

[0031] FIG. 15 illustrates UV 300nm absorbance as a function of UV pathlength

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0032] To circumvent the difficulties discussed in relation to prior art a real time control algorithm based on feedback like control principle is provided by the present invention. Accordingly, methods for assessing state of different columns at any given moment of the process are of particular interest. For instance, knowing of an operational status, e.g. binding capacity, of a chromatography column at a particular level of breakthrough would allow one to assess if the column can still bind solutes and how much solute still can be bound before the column reaches full saturation. Similarly, it is of paramount interest from the process yield perspective to know if the initial breakthrough capacity has been reached, as at this point the solute will be found in the effluent stream from the column and, if no proper action is taken, would be direct to waste or would be collected together with other non-binding components.

[0033] FIG. 1 shows schematically a part of a simple chromatography system according to the invention. This chromatography system comprises one chromatography column 1. It further comprises a feed line 3 connected to an inlet end 5 of the chromatography column 1. The sample to be passed through the column 1 can be added through the feed line 3. The system further comprises an effluent line 9 connected to the opposite end, i.e. the outlet end 7 of the chromatography column 1. The sample having passed the chromatography column 1 can pass through the effluent line 9. The chromatography system comprises further according to the invention a first detector 11 positioned somewhere along the feed line 3. The first detector 11 is adapted to detect a feed signal being representative of the composition of the feed material (sample) passing in the feed line. Furthermore, the chromatography system comprises a second detector 13 positioned somewhere along the effluent line 9 and adapted to detect an effluent signal being representative of the composition of the sample flowing out from the column 1 through the effluent line 9. The first and the second detectors 11, 13 are suitably the same type of detectors and in one embodiment this is a UV detector, i.e. measuring the UV absorbance of the sample. Other possible types of detectors are measuring pH, conductivity, light scattering, fluorescence, IR or visible light. If the different detectors in the system not are the same type of detectors the detected signals need to be correlated when used for the further calculations according to the invention.

[0034] Furthermore, according to the invention, the first and second detectors 11, 13 are both connected to a determining unit 15. Said unit analyzes the signals detected in the first and second detectors 11, 13 in order to determine the operational status of the chromatography column. Possible signals from the first and second detectors 11, 13 are shown in FIG. 2 in a diagram showing signal strength over time. The feed signal is denoted 21 and is the signal from the first detector 11. It is essentially a straight line since the feed sample is in this case and during this time window constant in composition. However, the feed signal may vary due to variations in concentration of target product and/or background.

[0035] The effluent signal is denoted 23 and is the signal from the second detector 13. The effluent signal 23 will start rise from zero at point a, as soon as some of the sample has passed the column 1 and entered the passage of the effluent line 9 where the second detector 13 is positioned. The signal will then rise until point b, where it levels out into a plateau 25. This plateau 25 arises when all the non-binding components in the feed have passed the column. A breakthrough point c is further defined after the plateau 25 when the signal 23 starts to rise again. This is due to the fact that the chromatography media in the column 1 starts to get saturated and some of the parts of the sample that should have been bound in the column start to break through the column. A breakthrough point d is further defined as the signal 23 approaches the signal 21. This point is defined as a saturation point and represents the moment when chromatography media is almost fully saturated with the binding components of the sample.

[0036] According to the invention at any given point in time a Delta signal is calculated which is defined to be the feed signal 21 chosen from signals measured between the given time reduced by a specified time delay owing to the specific hardware configuration and the given time minus the effluent signal 23 measured at the given time. The feed signal 21 measures the feature (in one embodiment UV absorbance) for both non-binding and binding components of the feed. The time delay is defined as a time for a non-binding compound in the sample to travel from the feed detector 11 (FIG. 1) to the effluent detector 13 (FIG. 1). The time delay can be measured applying the residence time distribution theory, or it can be measured by subtracting the time when signal 21 first reaches the highest plateau e from the time when signal 23 reaches the plateau 25. This is illustrated as arrow 29 in FIG. 2. The delta signal at one specific point in time is illustrated as arrow 28 in FIG. 2. As indicated this arrow 28 can be inclined if the time delay is compensated for.

[0037] According to the invention a Deltasignalmax 27 is calculated which is defined to be the feed signal 21 minus the signal level for the effluent signal 23 when it is in the plateau 25. This Deltasignalmax 27 can then be used for defining suitable levels for the breakthrough point and the saturation point for example. The breakthrough point c can suitably be defined to be a certain predefined percentage of the Deltasignalmax, for example somewhere in the span of 1-10% or more suitably in the span of 1-3% and the Saturation point d can suitably be defined to be a certain predefined percentage of the Deltasignalmax, for example somewhere in the span of 60-90% or more suitable in the span of 70-80%.

[0038] One advantage with this approach of determining the breakthrough point and the saturation point is that this could be done automatically in real time and it is independent of the feed concentration and/or composition since the feed signal is automatically compensated for.

[0039] In a further aspect of the invention these determinations of operational status, e.g. binding capacities, such as breakthrough and saturation points, are used for automatically controlling the start and stop of the different chromatography process steps, i.e. when a certain breakthrough or saturation point level has been reached a control system can control the chromatography system to proceed to the next process step such as redirecting column effluent to a different collection point, or to stop loading step and initiate column wash step.

[0040] In another aspect of the invention the chromatography system comprises more than one chromatography columns, in a so called periodic counter current (PCC) system. In the periodic counter current system, most of the time the feed is passed through at least two columns connected in series. The series is often called a loading zone and addition and removal of columns in/from the loading zone is based on predetermined breakthrough and saturation points for the last and the first column in series, respectively. In FIG. 3 such a system according to the invention comprising three columns is shown schematically. The benefits of the invention are even more explicit in this example, because one common problem in PCC systems is that in order to be able to get an efficient system operation the columns used in the system need to be as identical as possible and the feed composition and flow rates should be constant, or at least their changes with process time should be known a priori. With the invention, any differences in columns operational status and/or flow rates can be compensated for by adjusting for how long, and in which position, the different columns should be in the loading zone according to the determined breakthrough and saturation points.

[0041] In FIG. 3 a feed pump 31 is shown connected via a first detector 33 to a first valve block 35. A buffer pump 37 is also connected to this first valve block 35. The first valve block 35 is further connected to the inlet of a first column 39 via a first T-valve 41. An outlet end of the first column 39 is connected to a second T-valve 43 through a second detector 45. The first valve block 35 is further connected to the inlet of a second column 47 via a second valve block 49. An outlet end of the second column 47 is connected to a third valve block 51 via a third detector 53. Furthermore, a third T-valve 55 is connected between the second T-valve 43 and the third valve block 51. The third T-valve 55 is also connected to a fourth T-valve 57 which is also connected to the first T-valve 41 and the second valve block 49. Hereby the effluent from the first column 39 can be directed to the inlet of the second column 47 through T-valves 43, 55, 57 and block valve 49. Furthermore, the first valve block 35 is connected to the inlet of a third column 59 via a fifth T-valve 61. An outlet end of the third column 59 is connected to a sixth T-valve 63 via a fourth detector 65. Furthermore, a seventh T-valve 67 is connected between the third valve block 51 and the sixth T-valve 63. The seventh T-valve 67 is also connected to an eighth T-valve 69 which is also connected to the second valve block 49 and the fifth T-valve 61. Hereby the effluent from the second column 47 can be directed to the inlet of the third column 59. The effluent from the third column 59 can be directed to the inlet of the first column 39 through valves 63, 67, 51 55, 57 and 41. The construction of the first valve block 35 is schematically shown in FIG. 4a, the construction of the second valve block 49 is schematically shown in FIG. 4b and the constructions of the third valve block 51 is schematically shown in FIG. 4c. In these Figures each group of four boxes represents a T-valve (3 way valve). Furthermore, according to the invention the first, second, third and fourth detectors 33, 45, 53, 65 are all connected to a determining unit 71. The determining unit is adapted to use the detected signals from the detectors to determine breakthrough and saturation points for the three different columns. The determining unit 71 and all the valve blocks and T-valves and pumps are further connected to a control unit 73 (all the connections are not shown in the Figure) which is adapted to control the chromatography system in terms of when to remove or add columns from/into the loading zone, change flow rates, start new wash steps, etc. The detectors 33, 45, 53, 65 are in one embodiment UV detectors. Other examples of detectors that can be used for this invention have previously been discussed.

[0042] In one embodiment of the invention the chromatography process carried out in the system of FIG. 3 comprises:

[0043] (a) Continuously monitoring a signal in the feed line with the first detector 33 and in effluent from each of the columns 39, 47, 59 (with the second, third and fourth detectors 45, 53, 65) and calculating a difference between the feed signal shifted back in time by a predefined delay time and the effluent signals in the outflow line from each column 39, 47, 59;

[0044] (b) passing feed comprising at least one target compound across a 1st adsorbent (chromatography media in the first column 39), and directing the outflow from the 1st adsorbent to a 2nd adsorbent (chromatography media in the second column 47) when the Deltasignal (definition as described above in relation to FIG. 2) measured between the feed line and the effluent from the 1st adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x1;

[0045] (c) redirecting the feed to the 2nd adsorbent, and passing wash liquid across the 1st adsorbent to which target compound has bound when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 1st adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x2;

[0046] (d) directing the wash liquid outflow to the 3rd adsorbent (chromatography media in the third column 59) and subsequently directing the outflow from the 2nd adsorbent to the 3rd adsorbent when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 2nd adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x1;

[0047] (e) regenerating the 1st adsorbent;

[0048] (f) redirecting the feed to said 3rd adsorbent, and passing wash liquid across the 2nd adsorbent to which target compound has bound when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 2nd adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x2;

[0049] (g) directing the wash liquid outflow to the 1st adsorbent, and subsequently directing the outflow from the 3rd adsorbent to the 1st adsorbent when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 3rd adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x1;

[0050] (h) regenerating the 2nd adsorbent;

[0051] (i) redirecting the feed to said 1st adsorbent, and passing wash liquid across the 3rd adsorbent to which target compound has bound when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 3rd adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x2;

[0052] (j) directing the wash liquid outflow to the 2nd adsorbent, and subsequently directing the outflow from the 1st adsorbent to the 2nd adsorbent when the Deltasignal measured between the feed line and the effluent from a 1st adsorbent reaches a predetermined value x1;

[0053] (k) regenerating the 3rd adsorbent;

[0054] (l) repeating steps (b)-(k);

[0055] wherein at least one target compound is collected in step (d), (g) and/or (j).

[0056] Predetermined values of x1 and x2 represent breakthrough and saturation points, respectively.

[0057] The current invention enable use of not identical columns when operating a counter current system because any differences in the columns properties can be compensated for by automatically adjusting breakthrough and saturation switching points based on the Deltasignal and Deltsignalmax measured for each of the columns. It also enables operating a counter current system when unexpected changes in feed concentration occur as any change in the feed concentration, and thus a change in the mass loaded into each column can be compensated for by automatically adjusting the breakthrough and saturation switching points based on Deltasignal and Deltasignalmax that automatically compensates for variation in feed concentration.

[0058] In another embodiment of the invention, the chromatography system comprising of more than 2 chromatography columns can be used for direct capture of a product from a feed stream originated from a perfusion cell culture. For a person skilled in art, it is well known that concentrations of components in such stream will vary with time, and without an automated control algorithm operation of the chromatography system would be impossible without a risk of significant losses of product due to wrongly a priori assigned redirection points.

EXAMPLE

[0059] The present example is provided for illustrative purposes only, and should not be construed as limiting the present invention as defined by the appended claims.

[0060] This example illustrates a continuous primary capture step for purification of a monoclonal antibody (MAb) from a mixture containing MAb and bovine serum albumin, BSA, on protein A chromatography resin using a four column periodic counter current (4C-PCC) system with deltaUVmax control according to the invention (i.e. in this example the detectors are UV detectors and the Deltasignalmax is called deltaUVmax). More specifically, four similar columns were packed with the Protein A chromatography resin MabSelect (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). The columns were connected to a custom modified AKTAexplorer (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) chromatography system (FIG. 5) that was configured into a four column periodic counter current system, 4C-PCC with an automated control function based on continuous comparison of UV signals measured before and after each of the four columns. The system comprises three independent pumps, a feed pump 101, a first buffer pump 153 and a second buffer pump 155. The system further comprises a first column 107, a second column 109, a third column 111 and a fourth column 113. The system further comprises 5 UV detectors, a first UV detector 115 positioned on the feed line, a second UV detector 117 positioned after the first column 107, a third UV detector 119 positioned after the second column 109, a fourth UV detector 121 positioned after the third column 111 and a fifth UV detector 123 positioned after the fourth column 113. The system further comprises several rotary valves 125a-j and a flow splitter 127. The UV detectors 115, 117, 119, 121, 123 are positioned such that a feed stream and an effluent from each of the columns was passed through a UV detector (FIG. 5). Absorbance from each UV detector were recorded using UNICORN software (GE Healthcare Bio-Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). UNICORN is also used for control of all pumps and valves. MAb eluted from the protein A columns was collected in a single pool.

[0061] The following single column chromatography cycle was used as a base for operating the 4C-PCC system in a continuous manner: 1) column equilibration with 3 column volume (CV) of buffer A; 2) column loading with feed; 3) column wash with 4CV of buffer A; 4) column elution with 4CV of buffer B; 5) column CIP with 4CV of buffer C; and, 6) column regeneration with 3 CV of buffer A. All steps were performed at 0.4 mL/min flow rate.

[0062] Composition of solutions used is given below: [0063] Buffer A: PBS, pH 7 [0064] Buffer B: 0.1 M Sodium citrate, pH=3.5 [0065] Buffer C: 50 mM NaOH [0066] Feed: {tilde over ()}2.00 g/L MAb and 3 mg/ml BSA (Sigma) dissolved in buffer A

[0067] A few hundred milliliters of solution containing the feed were continuously fed into the experimental 4C-PCC setup described above. The absorbance of the feed solution was measured continuously by the first UV detector 115 positioned on the feed line (FIG. 5). The purified MAb was eluted from the system in a discreet manner by applying the buffer B into the saturated column. The saturated column was washed prior to the elution step. In FIG. 6, signals recorded in the feed line and in the effluent from each of the chromatography columns 107, 109, 111, 113 during the first, a start-up, 4C-PCC cycle consisting of: 1) loading of the feed into the first column 107; 2) connecting the 1st and the 2nd columns 107, 109 in series; 3) directing the feed into the 2nd column 109 while washing the 1st column 107 into the 3rd column 111; 4) connecting the 2nd and the 3rd columns 109, 111 in series while applying the feed; 5) eluting the 1st column 107; 6) regenerating the 1st column 107; 7) directing the feed to the 3rd column 111 while washing the 2nd column 109 in to the 4th column 113; 8) connecting the 3rd and the 4th columns 111, 113 in series while continuously applying the feed; 9) eluting the 2nd column 109; 10) regenerating the 2nd column 109; 11) directing the feed to the 4th column 113 while washing the 3rd column 111 in to the 1st column 107; 12) connecting the 4th and the 1st columns 113, 107 in series while continuously applying the feed; 13) eluting the 3rd column 111; 14) regenerating the 3rd column 111; 15) directing the feed to the 1st column 107 while washing the 4th column 113 in to the 2nd column 109; 16) connecting the 1st and the 2nd columns 107, 109 in series while continuously applying the feed; 17) eluting the 4th column 113; 18) regenerating the 4th column 113; 19) repeating steps 3-18 one more time.

[0068] The repetitive UV pattern shown in FIG. 2 is depicted in FIG. 6, where UV signals recorded during 9 single column loadings, representing two 4C-PCC cycles, are presented. The curve denoted 201 is the signal originating from the first UV detector 115 in FIG. 5, i.e. this is the feed signal. The curve denoted 203 is the signal originating from the second UV detector 117 in FIG. 5, i.e. this is the effluent signal from the first column 107. The curve denoted 205 is the signal originating from the third UV detector 119 in FIG. 5, i.e. this is the effluent signal from the second column 109. The curve denoted 207 is the signal originating from the fourth UV detector 121 in FIG. 5, i.e. this is the effluent signal from the third column 111. The curve denoted 209 is the signal originating from the fifth UV detector 123 in FIG. 5, i.e. this is the effluent signal from the fourth column 113. The chromatograms representing concentration of MAb in effluents from each of the column as shown in FIG. 6 were obtained by setting deltaUV (i.e. in this example the detectors are UV detectors and the Deltasignal is called deltaUV) criteria for detection of the breakthrough and the saturation points at x=3% and x=70% of deltaUVmax signal, respectively, according to the principle described in this invention, where x is given by:

[00001]$x=\frac{\mathrm{deltaUVmax}-\mathrm{deltaUV}}{\mathrm{deltaUVmax}}.Math..Math.100.Math.\%$

[0069] Summary of results obtained in this experiment is shown in Tables 1 and 2 below. Where the volume of feed solution and the calculated amount loaded onto each column is shown. These data are compared to the calculated results that would be obtained if no automated controlled according to this invention was used, i.e., using predesignated switching times of flow redirection as described in point 1-18 were used if the reference run were performed on the same system with the same columns. As shown in FIG. 6, the UV signal measured in the effluent from the first column 107 shows that a load onto the first column was shorter before the breakthrough of MAb was observed as compared to the loads applied to the other three column until the same levels of breakthrough. This premature breakthrough indicates that either the amount of the resin in this column or the resin itself was different than in the other two columns. In fact, prior to 4C-PCC experiment the first column 107 was treated to reduce its binding capacity and by doing so making it different from the other three columns.

[0070] Because the first column 107 was different than the second column 109 a premature breakthrough for this column would have been observed in an experiment when the 4C-PCC system was operated based on predefined column switching times. Under such conditions, a loss in MAb during step 1 of the cycle would have been observed. In addition, the amount of MAb loaded onto the second column 109 in step 2 would be larger than calculated and subsequently some of the MAb would be lost in the effluent from the second column 109 before this column would be connected to the third column 111 in step 4. This mismatch in amounts loaded onto the columns would then propagate through steps 5-18, and the amount of MAb not capture by the columns would steadily increase with each column switch. This loss in unbound MAb was avoided by implementing the control algorithm according to the current invention. In Table 1, estimated masses of MAb loaded onto each of the columns during the experiment are shown. The masses loaded were estimated based on the areas above respective UV curves measured in the effluent lines after each column. The mass washed out from one column and loaded on the second to the next column in series was neglected. As shown in Table 1 significantly different mass of MAb was loaded on to the first column 107 as compared to the mass loaded on the other three columns. The mass loaded on the first column 107 was between 20-30% smaller than the mass loaded on each of the other columns during two different cycles that was almost the same with no more than 5% difference between columns and cycles. If on the other hand, the 4C-PCC system was operated without the automated control with a switch time set to enable load of 77 mg per milliliter resin, the amount of MAb lost per cycle and column would be significant (Table 2) and would account for around 10% of mass loaded on to the system during the whole experiment.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Summary of 4C-PCC run. Mass of MAb in milligrams loaded on each columns during the two loading cycles.* Load 1 Load 2 Load 3 First column 54.3 56.6 55.8 Second column 77.1 74.2 Third column 74.4 76.5 Fourth column 73.8 74.9 *The first column was loaded three times

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Estimated mass that would be lost (found in the waste stream) per cycle and column if the 4C-PCC was operated at the constant switching time equivalent to the load of 77 g per liter resin. Load 1 Load 2 Load 3 First column 22.7 20.4 21.2 Second column 0.1 2.8 Third column 2.6 0.5 Fourth column 3.2 2.1

[0071] A standard ultraviolet (UV) detector for liquid chromatography measures the absorbance of monochromatic light of fixed wavelength in the UV or visible wavelength range (typically between 190 nm and 400 nm) against a reference beam and relates the magnitude of the absorbance to the concentration of a compound in the sample passing through a flow cell contained within the detector.

[0072] Compounds suitable for UV detection typically contain unsaturated bonds, aromatic groups, or functional groups containing heteroatoms, which contain * and * nonbonding orbitals into which electrons are promoted to absorb the incident energy. These nonbonding orbitals contain a wide distribution of vibrational and rotational energy levels that lead to a distribution of absorbance energies and therefore spectra with broad, rather than sharp features.

[0073] Compound concentration can be determined from the Beer-Lambert law as described in more detail below.

[0074] FIG. 7 illustrates a one embodiment of a flow cell absorption monitor system, such as a multi-wavelength Ultra-violet (UV)-Visible monitor, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,649,005 assigned to GE HEALTHCARE BIO SCIENCES AB (which is hereby incorporated as reference). This monitor 151 includes an interchangeable flow cell 153 and optical fibers 155 connecting the flow cell to the monitor unit 151. Monitor 151 may e.g. be a Monitor UV-900 manufactured by GE Healthcare, Life Sciences located in Uppsala, Sweden. This monitor utilizes advanced fiber optic technology to monitor light with high sensitivity at up to three wavelengths simultaneously in a range of 190-700 nm. The use of fiber optics together with the unique flow cell design ensures a signal-to-noise ratio with minimal drift and refractive index sensitivity. Typically, the monitor 151 includes a monochromator 157 with a light source (not shown), such as a xenon flash lamp (not shown) that provides a high intensity, continuous spectrum of light, and a tunable monochromator arrangement (not shown) for selecting the wavelength of light output to the fiber 155. The lamp is activated only during the chromatographic run, ensuring that its long lifetime of approximately 4000 hours of effective operation is used efficiently. However, the tuneable monochromator, may be any suitable type, capable of providing the desired wavelength range, or even two or more units with complementary wavelength ranges. In one embodiment, the tuneable monochromator is a tuneable laser unit capable of providing monochromatic light over a specified range. In some embodiments, when tuneability is of less importance, the tuneable monochromator may be substituted by one or more discrete monochromatic light sources. In another embodiment, the monochromator is replaced by a broad band light source, and a light detection unit 165 is e.g. a spectrometer capable of spectroscopically dividing the received spectra. In the disclosed monitor 151, the optical fiber 155 optics leads the light from the monochromator 157 to an optical splitter unit 159 splitting the light to a reference fiber 161 and a flow cell fiber 163 leading directly to the flow cell 153 and focus its full intensity on the liquid flow path, thus maximizing the sensitivity of the monitoring. Flow cell 153 may have any path length, such as a path length of 2 mm and cell volume of 2 l or path length of 10 mm and a cell volume of 8 l. The transmitted light through the flow cell 153 is guided to a light detection unit 165 via an optical fiber 171. The light detection unit 165 has a flow cell input 169 connected to fiber 171 and a reference input 167 connected to the reference fiber 161. The detection unit 165 further may comprise suitable processing means for comparing the flow cell input with the reference to detect changes in light absorption in the flow cell.

[0075] FIGS. 8A and 8B show a schematic optical flow cell detector 200 in accordance with an embodiment of the invention. The optical flow cell detector 200 comprises a detector body 205 with a sample inlet 210 and outlet 220 in fluidic communication through a flow cell channel 230 of cross sectional area A. The flow cell channel 230 may essentially be of any cross sectional area A as required for the specific application where it is to be used, depending on factors as flow rate, viscosity etc. In the disclosed embodiment, the cross sectional shape is circular which is beneficial from a manufacturing point of view as well as a fluid flow point of view, but it may actually be of essentially any suitable shape as long as the fluid flow characteristics are preserved within the desired range.

[0076] The detection optics is comprised of an input light guide 240 with a light exit surface 250 arranged adjacent and in optical alignment with a light entrance 260 surface of an output light guide 270. As is disclosed, the input light guide 240 and the output light guide 270 protrudes into the flow cell channel 230 so that the optical gap between the light exit surface 250 and the light entrance surface 260 is situated centrally in the flow cell channel 230. The optical gap may e.g. be situated at any position in the flow cell channel 230, as long as it is not located in a stagnant zone, e.g. adjacent a wall of the channel in order to ensure that the fluid in the gap is representative of the fluid flow. In the disclosed embodiment, the input light guide 240 and the output light guide 270 protrudes essentially transverse into the flow cell channel 230, whereby exchange of fluid in the optical gap is promoted. However, the angular relationship between the fluid flow channel and the light guides 240 and 270 need not be transverse, but can be any suitable angle and configuration provided that desired renewal of the fluid in the optical gap is achieved. In alternative embodiments, the fluid flow channel 230 need not be straight, but it may be curved or the like.

[0077] It has surprisingly been found that the present approach with relatively small sized light guides 240 and 270 protruding into the fluid flow channel 230 provides excellent capability of measuring high concentrations of e.g. proteins in the flow when arranged at a short distance from each other such as 0.5 mm or less. As will be discussed in more detail below, a high degree of linearity for high concentrations has been disclosed for embodiments with an optical gap of 0.12 and 0.07 mm. The optical gap is selected depending on the concentration range to be measured, and it may e.g. be any value from 0.02 to 2 mm such as 0.7, 0.5, 0.4, 0.3, 0.2, 0.1, 0.07, 0.05 mm or there between. It has been found that the fluid in the optical gap is readily exchanged even at the smallest gaps and at moderate flow rates, which is believed to be a result of the small optical cross sectional area and the protruded position of the gap essentially at the center of the fluid flow channel.

[0078] In FIGS. 8A and 8B, the optical gap is adjustable in that the light guides 240 and 270 are arranged in threaded ferrules 280 and 290 respectively, and the optical gap may be adjusted by turning the ferrules 280 and 290. In FIGS. 8A and 8B, the light guides 240 and 270 are sealed from the fluid flow channel by seals 295 e.g. in the form of O-rings or the like, to avoid fluid form exiting there through.

[0079] As is mentioned, it is believed to be essential to avoid disruption of the fluid flow, whereby a small cross sectional area of the protruding portions of the light guides and the output light guide in the flow direction is essential, and in the disclosed embodiments the total cross sectional area of the protruding portions of the input and output light guides 240, 270 is less than about A/2, or even A/4 in the flow direction. FIG. 8C shows an enlargement of the flow cell channel 230 region of the flow cell detector 200 of FIG. 8A and 8B, wherein the area A of the flow cell channel 230 is filled by a broad diagonal pattern and the protruding portions of the input and output light guides 240, 270 are filled by a rombohedric pattern. From FIG. 8C it is clear that the uninterrupted area of the flow cell channel 230 is essentially larger than the total area of the protruding light guides 240 and 270, whereby the fluid flow in the flow cell channel will be relatively uninterrupted. As mentioned the dimensions of the protruding sections of the input and output light guides 240, 270 may be designed in any suitable way to achieve a small cross sectional area compared to the area A of the flow channel 230, whilst providing rigid positioning of the optical end-surfaces of the input and output light guides 240, 270 respectively, in order to achieve desired optical transmittance there between. In FIG. 8C the optical cross sectional area or the detection area between the input and output light guides 240, 270 is indicated by dashed region 245. As is concluded elsewhere, the optical cross sectional area 245 in the present flow cell detector 200 is very small compared to the total area A of the flow channel 230, e.g. less than A/50, A/100, A/200, A/1000 or less. However, the present light guide type design ensures a high light flux in the small optical cross sectional area 245 (volume).

[0080] The light guides may be comprised of any suitable optical material capable of transmitting light, such as glass, quarts, light transmitting polymers etc. One or both may be provided with an optically blocking sleeve or coating (not shown) at the peripheral surface to avoid leakage of light. The light guides 240 and 270 may be cylindrical with a diameter of 5 mm or less, e.g. 3 mm, or 1 mm or the like. The diameter of the light guides 240 and 270 obviously depends on the total area A of the flow channel 230. The cross sectional flow area of the fluid flow channel, schematically disclosed in FIGS. 8A and 8B, may be essentially uniform in the flow direction throughout the flow cell. The reduced cross sectional flow area due to the protruding light guides 240 and 270 is compensated by a local widening of the fluid flow channel. This is particularly useful for flow cells with a relatively small fluid flow channel compared to the protruding light guides, but in other embodiments no compensation may be needed.

[0081] As can be seen in FIGS. 8A and 8B, the light guides 240 and 270 may be asymmetric in core size, with the input light guide being thinner than the output wave guide, in order to capture essentially the whole cone of light (its numerical aperture) emerging from the light exit surface at the light entrance surface 260.

[0082] In FIGS. 8A and 8B, the light guides 240 and 270 are shown in optical contact with optical fibers 163 and 171 respectively, in turn connected to a monitor unit 151 (not shown). However, one or both of the light guides 240 and 270 may be directly coupled to the optical detection system of the flow cell monitor system 151.

[0083] UV cell pathlength of the detector defines an operating window having an upper limit, and wherein the step of adapting the UV cell pathlength further comprises reducing the UV cell pathlength while maintaining the estimated maximal concentration of target compound below the upper limit.

[0084] The concept behind the invention is to provide a method for determining operational status, e.g. binding capacities, of a chromatography column, comprising: [0085] detecting a feed signal representative of the composition of a feed material provided to the inlet of the column; [0086] detecting the UV absorbance in the feed material, [0087] detecting an effluent signal representative of the composition of the effluent from the column; [0088] using the feed signal and the effluent signal to determine operational status of the column.

[0089] The feed signal is generated using a first UV detector having a first UV cell pathlength operating at a first UV wavelength and the effluent signal is generated using a second UV detector having a second UV cell pathlength operating at a second UV wavelength. The method further comprises. [0090] determining a first threshold value based on the detected UV absorbance in the feed, and [0091] selecting the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength based on the first threshold value.

[0092] The advantage of the above mentioned features is that the possibility to measure the composition of the feed material even when the composition of feed material varies over time, or is higher than originally anticipated.

[0093] The step of determining the first threshold value may comprise: [0094] estimating maximum UV absorbance in feed material, and [0095] selecting the first threshold value to ensure that the estimated maximum UV absorbance in the feed material is detectable in the first UV detector.

[0096] The feed material comprises impurities and product, and the absorbance measured by the first UV detector is a combination of the contribution from both. The impurities results in background absorbance when measured in the first UV detector, and the product results in an absorbance level of the product in the feed material when measured in the first UV detector.

[0097] In one aspect the absorbance level of the product is at least forty percent (40%) of the background absorbance of the feed material. In another aspect, the absorbance level of the product in the feed material is higher than the background absorbance, preferably the absorbance level of the product in the feed material is 70%-90% of the absorbance measured in the first UV detector.

[0098] The step of selecting the first UV cell pathlength may comprise selecting a fixed UV cell pathlength from a plurality of pre-selected UV cell pathlengths, or adjusting the UV cell pathlength. However, the step of selecting the first UV wavelength may also comprise adjusting the first UV wavelength.

[0099] According to one aspect, the step of selecting the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength is performed until a suitable operating window of the first UV detector is achieved. This is achieved when the first UV detector is within a linear range of detection.

[0100] In a first embodiment, the UV absorbance of the feed material is calculated, and the step of estimating maximum UV absorbance is based on the calculated UV absorbance. The calculation may be based on the Beer-Lambert Law (see above).

[0101] In a second embodiment the UV absorbance of the feed material is measured, and the step of estimating maximum UV absorbance is based on the measured UV absorbance. The measurement may be performed before running a batch in the chromatography system to calibrate the UV detector. Alternatively, the UV absorbance of the feed material is continuously measured, and the first threshold value is continuously selected based on changes in UV absorbance.

[0102] The step of selecting the first threshold value may be performed when the change in UV absorbance is more than a pre-determined percentage compared to the first threshold value. As an example, the pre-determined percentage may be 1%, 2%, 5%, 10%, 15% or 20% of the threshold value used to select the UV cell pathlength. In a particular embodiment, the UV detector comprises a plurality of pre-selected UV cell pathlengths. This may be realised by a UV detector provided with several parallel light guides having different UV cell pathlengths. In another embodiment, the distance between the light guides may be adjusted to obtain different UV cell pathlengths in response to desired characteristics.

[0103] Thus, if the UV detector measure an increase in UV absorbance of a pre-determined percentage, e.g. 5%, then the UV cell length is reduced to ensure that the composition of the feed material still can be detected.

[0104] The method further comprising detecting the feed signal and the effluent signal using the same type of detector, i.e. UV detectors, to detect the UV absorbance in the effluent. The effluent signal is generated using a second UV detector having a second UV cell pathlength operating at a second wavelength, the method further comprising: [0105] determining a second threshold value based on the detected UV absorbance and/or the first threshold value, and [0106] selecting the second UV cell pathlength and/or second UV wavelength based on the second threshold value.

[0107] Preferably, the second threshold value is lower or equal to the first threshold value.

[0108] According to one embodiment, the step of determining the second threshold value comprises: [0109] estimating UV absorbance for a selected breakthrough point in the effluent, and [0110] selecting the second threshold value to ensure that the estimated UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point is detectable in the second UV detector. The selected breakthrough point is normally defined as a certain percentage of the deltasignalmax, as previously described.

[0111] The breakthrough point is an indication that the chromatography column is full and the feed of material into the column has to stop or be shifted to another column.

[0112] The UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point may be calculated, and the step of estimating UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point in the effluent is based on the calculated UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point.

[0113] In a further embodiment the method further comprises measuring the UV absorbance in the effluent, preferably continuously, and the step of estimating UV absorbance for the selected breakthrough point is based on the measured UV absorbance.

[0114] In an embodiment, the method further comprises selecting the second UV cell pathlength to be equal to the first UV cell pathlength.

[0115] Similar to the first UV detector, the step of selecting the second UV cell pathlength may comprise selecting a fixed UV cell pathlength from a plurality of pre-selected UV cell pathlengths, or adjusting the UV cell pathlength. However, the step of selecting the second UV wavelength may also comprise adjusting the second UV wavelength.

[0116] According to one aspect, the step of selecting the second UV cell pathlength and/or second UV wavelength is performed until a suitable operating window of the second UV detector is achieved. This is achieved when the second UV detector is within a linear range of detection.

[0117] The method may further comprise, when the first UV cell pathlength and/or first UV wavelength is changed, applying a time delay corresponding to a residence time in the column before the second UV cell pathlength and/or second UV wavelength is changed.

[0118] Advances in cell culture technology have enabled the production of antibody titers upwards of 30 g/L. These highly productive cell culture systems can potentially lead to productivity bottlenecks in downstream purification due to lower column loadings, especially in the primary capture chromatography step. Alternative chromatography solutions to help remedy this bottleneck include the utilization of continuous processing systems such as periodic counter current chromatography (PCC).

[0119] Recent studies have provided methods to optimize and improve the design of PCC for cell culture titers up to 5 g/L. This disclosure defines an experimental strategy for purification of a range of cell culture titers up to about 41 g/L. Initial experimentation showed an inability to determine a difference in change in UV280 nm signal (i.e. UV) between cell culture feed and monoclonal antibody (mAb) concentration for column loadings up to at least 100 g/L. Further investigation revealed UV280 absorbance of the cell culture feedstock without antibody was outside of the linear range of detection. Additional experimentation showed the difference in UV for various cell culture feedstocks can be either theoretically predicted by Beer's Law given a known absorbance of the media background and impurities or experimentally determined using various UV280 cell pathlengths. Based on these results, a 0.35 mm pathlength was chosen for dynamic control. Dynamic binding experiments showed a difference in experimental versus theoretical antibody breakthrough curves that was heavily dependent on the feed type and shape of breakthrough chromatograph. Based on the DBC and AUV data, the breakthrough challenge for column experiments was set at UV of 70%. Performance metrics, yield, and purity, were acceptable between various cell culture feeds and titers up to about 31 g/L, which showed UV can dynamically control and define loading in a continuous chromatography process. At titers above 31 g/L, the linearity declines for a 0.35 mm UV pathlength at a UV280 nm signal but retains linearity at a UV300 nm signal using the same pathlength. Therefore, the UV300 nm signal could be a detection option for controlling loading of feeds greater than 31 g/L. The strategy and results presented in this disclosure show column loading in a continuous chromatography step can be dynamically controlled independent of the cell culture feedstock and titer and allow for enhanced process control for implementation into downstream continuous operations.

[0120] Transition from batch to continuous processing has proven very successful in many industries, yet its implementation into biologics manufacturing has currently been relatively deliberate [1-3]. This can be attributed mainly to a perception that continuous technology is still in its infancy (i.e. an emerging technology) and due to uncertainties regarding regulatory demands for moving from batch production to continuous production [4, 5]. Additional concerns for adaptation are centered around an increased complexity in operation and process control [6].

[0121] The trend towards continuous processing, as seen in many other industries, is clear from an economic perspective since it can achieve higher productivities at shorter processing times with reduced total costs, reduced equipment footprint, and consistent product quality [7]. Continuous processing has been extensively studied and established for fermentation operations using perfusion culture technology but limited examples exist for downstream continuous processing [8-10]. For example, recent literature has demonstrated a continuous process from a perfusion bioreactor through to the downstream polishing steps using periodic counter-current chromatography for the capture and polishing chromatography steps US20140255994(A1), Genzyme Corporation, hereby incorporated by reference. Current approaches for downstream continuous chromatography include simulated moving bed chromatography (SMB), periodic counter-current chromatography (PCC), and sequential multi-column chromatography (SMCC) [11-14]. These enabling technologies refer to a chromatography capture step, utilizing multiple columns which are periodically moved against the direction of feed flow. The main difference of each technology is manifested in the design of the actual hardware between different multicolumn chromatographic systems. One main challenge is that limited information, process controls, and methodologies exist for implementation of these chromatography technologies from laboratory to manufacturing scales to enable a continuous downstream process.

[0122] One key facet for operating a continuous chromatography process involves the determination of a steady state protein loading onto each column. Steady state loading allows for minimal protein losses in the process resulting in higher productivities compared to a batch process. Previous solutions for controlling protein loading during continuous chromatography involve either a time based or dynamic control mode. Time base mode involves protein loading as a function of a set value of time, which can result in higher protein losses as a function of resin re-use assuming a decrease in dynamic binding capacity with time [15]. In addition, time base mode for protein loading also does not take into consideration any potential variability in performance amongst columns. Dynamic control of protein loading is based on the relative difference in ultraviolet (UV) signal between the column inlet and outlet UV absorbance (i.e. UV) converted into a percentage. Using this relationship allows loading to a defined level of breakthrough, in order to maximize the column loading to ensure minimal product losses and consistent protein concentrations in each chromatography elution pool [16]. One challenge with dynamic control as cited in the literature is that a minimal difference in UV signal of impurities and antibody can occur for different cell culture feedstocks, which significantly decreases the robustness and utility of dynamic control. In turn, this low signal to noise ratio forces the user to operate in a time based mode for protein loading [17]. Throughout this specification, the term protein is used and should be construed in a general manner to comprise proteins in general and to include but not be limited to antibodies, monoclonal antibodies, antibody conjugates and protein conjugates.

[0123] Previous work in the literature has demonstrated the use of multivariable wavelength detectors to control and equalize the antibody breakthrough signal given a perfusion titer of about 2-3 g/L [18]. This allows the user to achieve a consistent delta UV percentage across columns to eliminate variability in column loading [18]. One drawback of this approach for dynamic control is that the root cause of the interference problem would need to be investigated and determined at various wavelengths, which can be an intractable challenge with current cell culture media designs and continuous upstream cell culture optimization. Another challenge of a multivariable wavelength detector is the protein absorbance will be significantly reduced, which may limit the range of feed titer that can be dynamically controlled by the UV detector. Our discovery builds upon the initial principle of UV control by providing a solution for overcoming the difference in UV signal between impurities and proteins, which allows the user to utilize dynamic control for protein loading in a continuous chromatography process. Furthermore, in this disclosure, the ability to dynamically control protein loading for high concentration cell culture feedstocks up to about 31 g/L is also demonstrated, and additional data indicates that dynamic control is possible for titers greater than 31 g/L if a UV300 nm wavelength were utilized.

[0124] Investigation of impurity versus antibody absorbance levels for a variety of different UV cell pathlengths were evaluated and compared against theoretical calculations to determine the optimal pathlength for signal detection and control. Continuous chromatograph experiments were executed using different harvest impurity feedstocks and titers to determine the ability to dynamically control column loading independent of different types of harvest feedstocks. These sets of data were utilized to define a continuous chromatography process, which can dynamically control protein loading independent of the cell culture feedstock, generate consistent quality elution pools, and allow for enhanced process control for implementation into downstream continuous operations.

[0125] Materials & Methods

[0126] Harvested Cell Culture Fluid (HCCF)

[0127] The antibodies used in this study along with cell culture media are listed in Table I.

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE I Properties of monoclonal antibodies and cell culture characteristics used for the dynamic binding experiments. Approximate Cell Culture HCCF Isoelectric Media and Concentration Antibody Isotype Point (pI) Impurities Range (g/L) mAb 1 IgG4 6.8 Low UV 1.5 to 31 absorbance feed High UV 3 to 26 absorbance feed (ie. trickyfeed) mAb 2 IgG1 8.2 Mediun UV 3 to 41 absorbance feed mAb 3 IgG1 9.0 High UV 3 to 28 absorbance feed (ie. trickyfeed)

[0128] Each fermentation batch consisted of a 14-day fed-batch process with harvest viability of at least 60%. Each batch was harvested by an optional centrifugation step followed by depth filtration and sterile filtration. The material was then stored frozen and thawed prior to use. A portion of the HCCF was ultrafiltered to reach some of the desired feed concentration set points if necessary. The UV background of the impurities was not significantly affected by this concentration step.

[0129] Protein A Chromatography Process

[0130] The chromatography resin used throughout this study was MabSelect SuRe (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden), which is an agarose-based Protein A affinity matrix. The columns were equilibrated with 3 column volumes (CVs) of 10 mM sodium phosphate pH 6.5. After loading of harvested cell culture fluid, the columns were washed with equilibration buffer for 3 CVs. To remove product-related impurities, the columns were washed with 10 mM sodium phosphate, 0.5M sodium chloride pH 6.5 for 3 CVs followed by equilibration buffer for 3 CVs. The antibody was eluted using 20 mM sodium acetate pH 3.5 for about 3-4 CVs. The columns were cleaned using a combination of 100 mM acetic acid pH 2.9 and 0.1N NaOH. All columns were stored in 200 mM sodium acetate, 2 v % benzyl alcohol pH 5.5.

[0131] Reverse Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography (RP-HPLC)

[0132] The analytical RP-HPLC method consisted of a R2/10, 2.1 mm30 mm column (Applied Biosystems) with column temperature maintained at 70 C. The antibody concentration was determined using the following gradient at a flowrate of 2 mL/min: Mobile Phase A: 0.2 v % trifluoroacetic acid (TFA) in water, Mobile Phase B: 0.2 v % TFA in 90% acetonitrile, Method: 68% A to 40% A in 5 minutes followed by 1 minutes at 100% B, and then 2 minutes at 68% A. UV280 nm absorbance was recorded during each injection and peaks were integrated using Chemstation software (Agilent Technologies). Antibody concentration was determined using a standard curve.

[0133] Ultra Performance Size Exclusion Chromatography (UP-SEC)

[0134] The analytical UP-SEC method consisted of a BEH 200, 4.6150 mm column (Waters) with column temperature maintained at ambient temperature (15-30 C.). Monomer, dimer, and higher order aggregate separation was obtained in 100 mM sodium phosphate, 100 mM sodium chloride pH 7.2 with a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min for 5 minutes. UV214 nm absorbance was recorded during each injection and peaks were integrated using Chemstation software (Agilent Technologies). The monomer purity percentage was determined by the monomer peak divided by the total peak area. The aggregate content percentage was determined by the sum of the peak area of each aggregate peak divided by the total peak area.

[0135] High Performance Ion Exchange Chromatography (HP-IEX)

[0136] Analytical high performance ion exchange chromatography (HP-IEX) method was performed using a 4 mm250 mm Dionex cation exchange ProPac WCX-10 column (Waltham, Mass., USA) on an Agilent 1200 HPLC system. The main monomer peak was separated from the acidic and basic mAb variants using a linear gradient with increasing salt concentration and pH. Acidic variants are defined as species with pl less than the average pl of the monomer whereas basic variants are defined as specifies with pl higher than the average pl of the monomer. The main peak percentage was determined using UV280 nm by dividing the main monomer peak area by the total peak area. The acidic or basic variant percentages were determined by the sum of the acidic or basic variant peak areas respectively divided by the total peak area. Acidic and basic variants can be composed of monomers and aggregates.

[0137] Ultraviolet (UV) Absorbance Measurements of HCCF

[0138] UV280 nm measurements were taken of both the HCCF feeds and samples without antibody (i.e. Protein A flowthrough) ranging from 3 to 41 g/L using pathlengths from 0.05 to 2 mm using the Solo VPE (C Technologies, Bridgewater, N.J.). A curve of absorbance versus pathlength was created to determine linearity of the feeds. The theoretical antibody absorbance was also measured by Beer's Law and compared to the experimental value for various cell culture feeds. Beer's Law is described by the following equation:

A=E.sup.1%bc

where A=absorbance (Au) [0139] E.sup.1%=extinction coefficient at 1% of 280 nm absorbance [0140] b=pathlength (mm)

[0141] and c=protein concentration (g/L)

[0142] Dynamic Binding Chromatography (DBC) Experiments

[0143] HCCF was loaded onto about a 4 mL column (0.5 cm20 cm) containing MabSelect SuRe resin up to a resin loading of about 120 grams of protein per liter of resin (g/L) to ensure full antibody breakthrough. Fractions were collected during loading and analyzed using RP-HPLC to determine percentage of antibody breakthrough. Linear velocity ranges were studied from 100 to 600 cm/hr. For the dynamic binding experiments, antibody breakthrough percentage was calculated using the following equation:

[00002]$\mathrm{BT}=\frac{C_{\mathrm{loading}.Math..Math.\mathrm{fraction}}}{C_{\mathrm{HCCF}}}100$

where BT=antibody breakthrough (%)

[0144] C.sub.loading fraction=antibody concentration by offline RP-HPLC of each fraction during column loading (g/L)

[0145] and C.sub.HCCF=antibody concentration by offline RP-HPLC of HCCF (g/L)

[0146] The dynamic binding capacity was predicted for various antibody feed concentrations and linear velocities with the Method Design Tool (GE Healthcare, Uppsala, Sweden) using the pore diffusion model. Theoretical DBC results were compared against experimental DBC results to determine the accuracy of the pore diffusion model as a function of antibody feed concentration.

[0147] Periodic Counter-Current Chromatography (PCC) Experiments

[0148] The PCC chromatography system was operated in the 3-column mode using three 4 mL columns. FIGS. 9A and 9B details the process description for the PCC system when operated in the 3-column mode. FIG. 9A shows a schematic of the start-up phase (i.e. loading) and loop phase of the 3-column KTA pcc 75 system, and FIG. 9B shows a schematic of the close down phases of the 3-column KTA pcc 75 system. In an effort to test the capacity of the UV cells to dynamically control the HCCF loading and maximize the resin capacity, the deltaUV was set at 70% during the HCCF loading. In the start-up phase, the HCCF was loaded onto the first column in the loading zone (Column 1) and the breakthrough (BT) was collected onto the second column in the loading zone (Column 2) until column 1 reached 70% breakthrough capacity as indicated in FIG. 9A. The HCCF loading was switched to column 2 while the first wash buffer is applied to column 1 and passed to column 3 to retain any unbound protein. The second and third wash steps, elution, regeneration, and equilibration are performed on column 1 while the HCCF continues loading onto column 2 (i.e. first column in the loading zone) and the breakthrough was collected onto column 3 (i.e. the second column in the loading zone). If the deltaUV reaches 70% before the end of the loop, then the HCCF loading onto the column will stop until a new column is available. The PCC system continued to switch and load for the other columns as described until designated in the program to stop the PCC cycle (i.e. one PCC cycle is equivalent to three column elutions while one PCC loop is equivalent to one column elution). In the first phase of the closedown block, the first wash is applied onto column 1 and passed to column 2 to retain any unbound protein.

[0149] In the second phases of the closedown block, columns 1 and 2 are washed, eluted, and regenerated separately, as indicated in FIG. 9B. Each elution peak is collected into one main elution pool based on a UV start trigger and CV end collection criteria. Each column is stored in 200 mM sodium acetate, 2v % benzyl alcohol pH 5.5 at the end of each PCC experiment.

[0150] Dynamic Control

[0151] The dynamic control function utilizes the difference in UV absorbance between the total UV absorbance from the product and the background, and the background of the feed. This difference is defined as AUV.

[0152] FIG. 10 shows a schematic of the dynamic control function and determination of AUV during HCCF for the KTA pcc 75 system. The UV detectors responsible for the dynamic control establishes the UV from the difference in UV absorbance signal before the column (UV.sub.Pre column) and after the column (UV.sub.Post column). Two additional UV detectors are also responsible for monitoring the UV after the second column in the load zone (UV Sample Recirculation) and the over the eluted column (UV Prod), not shown in the figure, respectively. For our studies, either a {tilde over ()}2 mm or {tilde over ()}0.35 mm pathlength on a single UV280 nm cell was utilized to detect UV. Each

[0153] UV cell was calibrated against the UV Prod cell prior to experimentation. The UV was set to 70% for the initial experiments and then ranged from about 20-45% for subsequent experiments.

[0154] Results & Discussion

[0155] Evaluation of Dynamic Binding Capacity for Various HCCF Feedstreams

[0156] Prior to testing any of the HCCF feeds with the 3-column PCC method, the relationship between antibody breakthrough as a function of column loading and UV was investigated. A dynamic binding capacity (DBC) experiment was conducted using the high UV absorbance HCCF to determine the UV difference of impurities versus antibody.

[0157] FIG. 11A shows a comparison of antibody breakthrough using a 0.5 mm UV cell pathlength (solid line) versus a 2 mm UV cell pathlength (dotted line) as a function of column volumes during loading of HCCF for mAb 1 tricky feed stream. Column fractions were collected during loading and tested by RP-HPLC to determine antibody concentration (dashed line) and overlaid with the UV280 nm absorbance curve obtained from KTA avant chromatographs. FIG. 11B shows antibody breakthrough (dashed line) measured offline overlaid against UV280 nm absorbance at 2 mm UV cell pathlength (solid line) as a function of protein loading (grams of mAb per liter of resin) for mAb 1 low UV absorbance feed stream.

[0158] Since the media impurities had a very high background absorption outside the linear range of the UV detector, the DBC experiment did not show any difference in UV as indicated in FIG. 11A. Therefore, it was hypothesized that a reduction in UV cell pathlength, bringing the measurement back into the linear range, result in antibody absorbance signals lower than with a 2 mm cell but still significant enough to detect breakthrough on a column.

[0159] In order to confirm this hypothesis, Beer-Lambert's Law was utilized to calculate the theoretical antibody absorbance for two different types of mAb #1 HCCF feed streams at 0.5 mm versus 2 mm UV cell pathlengths. For the high UV absorbance feed, the theoretical mAb #1 absorbance was 0.85 Au but the HCCF components plus antibody was at least 4.4 AU, which is beyond the linear range and explains why antibody breakthrough could not be detected in the DBC experiment, as indicated in Table II. However, at 280 nm and a pathlength of 0.5 mm, the theoretical antibody absorbance decreased from 0.85 AU to 0.21 AU, which should be sufficient to allow for dynamic control using UV. The HCCF absorbance without antibody decreased significantly within the linear range to 1.6 AU. Another DBC experiment was performed using the 0.5 mm UV280 nm pathlength and resulted in a AUV of about 0.22 AU, which correlated exactly to the increase in antibody breakthrough detected through offline RP-HPLC analysis.

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE II Theroetical versus experimental results for mAb #1 absorbance at 0.5 mm versus 2 mm UV cell pathlengths for two different types of HCCF. Cell Culture UV280 nm Media and MAb #1 MAb #1 Pathlength Impurities Theroetical Experimental Type of HCCF (mm) Absorbance (Au) Absorbance (Au) Absorbance (Au) High UV absorbance 2 3.5.sup. 0.85 Beyond linear range feed (ie, tricky feed) at 3 (Limit of detection) of detector g/L titer 0.5 1.6 0.21 0.22 Low UV absorbance feed 2 1.3 0.41 0.42 at 1.5 g/L titer 0.5 0.4 0.09 0.10

[0160] For the mAb #1 low UV absorbance HCCF feed stream, Beer Lambert's law indicates the theoretical antibody absorbance at 0.41 Au will be sufficient for UV control at 2 mm pathlength but the theoretical antibody absorbance at 0.10 Au will be too low for accurate UV control at the 0.5 mm pathlength. A DBC experiment was performed using the 2 mm pathlength cell and confirmed a UV difference of 0.42 Au, which matched the calculated antibody absorbance of 0.41 Au from Beer's law, as indicated in FIG. 11B. Therefore, column loading of the mAb #1 low UV absorbance feed can be dynamically controlled in a PCC mode using a 2 mm UV cell pathlength.

[0161] However, the column loading of the mAb #1 high absorbance feed can only be dynamically controlled using a lower UV cell pathlength, for this study a pathlength of 0.5 mm was sufficient. In order to utilize a lower UV cell pathlength in future PCC experiments, the linearity and ability to sufficiently control the UV was investigated in connection with FIGS. 12A-12D.

[0162] Determination of UV Cell Pathlength and Linearity for Dynamic Control of Various HCCF Feeds

[0163] A prerequisite for reliable real time monitoring of the UV absorbance during column loading or elution is that the UV absorbance signal is within the linear range. This is not a limitation from running PCC or continuous chromatography. Rather it is an inherent characteristic of the feed used in the process, where both the antibody titer as well as the background of the impurities, media and components will influence the available range for the dynamic control. Since it was demonstrated that Beer's law can be used to predict if UV control will be successful for different HCCF feed streams for a given antibody, the absorbance of different HCCF feedstocks for various antibodies were measured to determine both the UV difference and linearity versus UV cell pathlength. This information will provide valuable insight to determine if the column loading of different HCCF feedstocks at various titers from 3 to 41 g/L can be dynamically controlled in a PCC mode, as indicated in Table I.

[0164] FIGS. 12A-12D show a comparison of UV280 nm absorbance versus UV cell pathlength. FIG. 12A: mAb #1 high UV absorbance HCCF at titers ranging from 3 to 26 g/L. FIG. 12B: mAb #1 low UV absorbance HCCF at titers ranging from 4 to 31 g/L. FIG. 12C: mAb #2 medium UV absorbance HCCF at titers ranging from 3 to 38 g/L. FIG. 12D: mAb #3 high UV absorbance HCCF at titers ranging from 3 to 26 g/L.

[0165] The UV280 nm absorbance of each HCCF sample including a sample without antibody (i.e. Protein A flowthrough) was measured for pathlengths ranging from 0.05 to 2 mm. For both high UV absorbing feeds (mAb #1 and mAb #3), the absorbance of the sample without antibody loses linearity at a 1 mm pathlength (as seen in the previous study). As the UV cell pathlength decreases, the absorbance of the blank sample becomes linear as a function of UV cell pathlength but there is a minimal AUV difference at pathlengths from 0.05 to 0.15 mm since the antibody absorbance significantly decreases as indicated in FIGS. 12A and 12D. The optimal pathlength range for HCCF containing high UV absorbance is between 0.2 to 0.5 mm for feeds ranging from about 3 to 30 g/L. At 0.5 mm pathlength, the linearity is beginning to decrease at higher concentrations of about 30 a. The linearity is maintained below the 0.5 mm pathlength, which indicates a pathlength between 0.2 to 0.35 mm would be best for maintaining UV linearity and UV control under varying conditions. The minimum titer to maintain an appropriate UV difference with respect to baseline drift and signal noise (i.e. at least {tilde over ()}150 mAu) is about 3 a for the high UV HCCF feeds.

[0166] For the mAb #1 HCCF sample containing the lowest total UV absorption, the AUV difference is more pronounced even at lower pathlengths (down to 0.35 mm) if target protein exceeds 4 g/L as indicated in FIG. 12B. The optimal pathlength for dynamical control is 0.35 mm for titers covering the range from about 3 to 31 g/L. Even for conditions with low HCCF background AUV can be determined. For the mAb #2 HCCF sample containing the medium UV absorption, the optimal UV cell pathlengths for dynamic control are between 0.2 to 0.5 mm, as indicated in FIG. 12C. However, at the highest titer condition of 26 g/L, the UV absorbance loses linearity at the 0.5 mm pathlength but is marginally acceptable at the 0.35 mm pathlength. Based on analysis of the different HCCF feeds, the best compromise is 0.35 mm pathlength to achieve a robust difference in AUV and also maintain linearity for HCCF titers from about 3 to 31 g/L. The UV becomes unstable with varying loading conditions. The UV will change based on the ratio of product to impurities. For higher concentrations than 31 g/L, either a UV cell with a shorter path length than 0.35 mm should be considered or an alternative UV cell wavelength where the analyte has a lower extinction coefficient while conserving the cell pathlength.

[0167] The ability to dynamically control protein loading using the UV functionality for a 3C-PCC column system was tested using the four HCCF feeds listed in Table I. In order to challenge the ability of the UV280 nm UV cell to control protein loading, the AUV percentage was set at 70% for all of the runs. Performance metrics for the column experiments included a comparison of yield and purity levels to the control, which is a batch mode process to determine the success of the dynamic control function. Protein loading and UV280 nm difference between the UV pre and post column in the start-up phase and within the loop were monitored for each run to aid in determination of the ability to control protein loading using the UV280nm shorter pathlength cells.

[0168] This higher loading in the start-up phase could result in some antibody that is not captured by the second column in the loading zone and hence lost in the flowthrough as indicated in Table IV.

TABLE-US-00005 TABLE IV Protein A chromatography yield, protein loading, and UV280 nm difference (mAu) using four different types of HCCF with the protein column loading controlled by a UV setpoint of 70%. UV 280 nm 3C-PCC Protein Loading (g/L) Difference (mAu) Cell Culture Yield Start-up Within Start-up Within feed (%) Phase Loop Phase Loop mAb 1 Low UV control 93 4 g/L 91 72 54 176 179 10 g/L 89 73 56 368 355 15 g/L 84 89 60 620 598 31 g/L 83 105 73 1137 1251 mAb 1 High UV control 95 3 g/L 95 74 52 142 143 9 g/L 94 78 55 306 294 19 g/L 92 88 60 698 665 26 g/L 91 93 58 865 780 mAb 2 Med UV control 95 4 g/L 92 71 54 143 136 7 g/L 91 80 59 288 299 10 g/L 88 83 64 402 386 20 g/L 87 103 68 704 684 41 g/L 82 124 71 717 637 mAb 3 High UV control 97 3 g/L 100 54 38 162 162 8 g/L 99 71 48 345 340 15 g/L 98 80 51 746 698 28 g/L 95 96 51 1003 779

[0169] However, either a lower setpoint for UV or possibly setting the baseline value earlier during the loading will decrease the protein loading and should increase the antibody recovery to within a few percentage of the batch mode control levels. The 41 a medium UV absorbance HCCF feed may be the only exception since the UV capabilities of this feed was shown to be outside of the linear range described in connection with FIGS. 12A-12D. In addition, the difference in UV280nm signal is about 13 mAu outside of the loop and about 15 mAu inside of the loop for the 41 g/L feed compared to the 20 a feed, which also indicates a loss in UV cell linearity at the 41 a feed concentration. For feeds with at least about 35 a concentration, a UV cell with even shorter pathlength should be considered or a UV cell with a 300 nm wavelength.

[0170] The ability of the UV pre and post sample cells to consistently control the AUV setpoint is shown in FIGS. 13A-13D, which illustrate examples of AKTA chromatographs showing protein loading control by UV for mAb #1 low UV feed with HCCF titers ranging from 4 to 31 g/L. The UV280 nm absorbance of the HCCF (i.e. UV sample pre) is shown in as UV pre sample while the UV post sample shows the UV280 nm absorbance of the outlet of the first column in the loading zone (i.e. UV sample post). The periodic peaks show the wash, elution, and strip peaks for each of the three columns.

[0171] For HCCF titers up to 10 g/L, the column loading is consistent across each column as shown by the KTA chromatograph, see FIGS. 13C-13D. However, when the HCCF titers increase up to 31 g/L, each column experiences a time difference in antibody breakthrough, which can be seen by the UV function stopping the column loading at a setpoint of 70% during the loop at slightly different times for each column, see FIGS. 13A-13B. This result highlights the capability of dynamic control to maintain a consistent protein loading for each column, which is independent of the feedstock being purified.

[0172] Additional studies were conducted to determine the impact of the UV setpoint on the process performance of the Protein A chromatography step and quality of the FNVIP pools. The lower range of the UV was set at 20% based on the DBC curves in connection with FIGS. 13 and 14 in order to maintain a column loading in the loop that is similar to the lower concentration HCCF feeds. An additional UV setpoint of 45% was also chosen in the middle of the range between 20-70% for comparison. HCCF feeds used for experimentation consisted of titers of at least 15 g/L with a low to medium UV background since yield loss has a stronger correlation with both of these parameters. A HCCF feed at 3 g/L was chosen for experimentation to confirm minimal impact of UV within 20-70% on yield loss.

[0173] FIG. 14A-14D show yield and quality data for FNVIP pools at the additional UV setpoints. In FIG. 14A, Protein A chromatography yield shows a decline of about 10-20% as the UV increases for all feeds studied except for the mAb #1 high UV feed. In FIG. 14B, purity by UP-SEC of the FNVIP pools is very consistent for each group of samples and does not change with higher protein loading (i.e. increase in UV setpoint). In FIG. 14C, residual HCP levels were similar across the different UV setpoints for the mAb #1 high UV, 3 g/L feed and mAb #2 medium UV, 20 g/L feed. HCP levels slightly increased and reached a maximum for the other two feeds. In FIG. 14D, residual Protein A ligand levels increase by about 5-10 ppm as the protein loading increases for each feed except for the mAb #2 medium UV, 20 g/L feed. * represents mAb 1 low UV, 15 g/L; ** represents mAb 1 low UV, 31 g/L; # represents mAb #1 high UV, 3 g/L; ## represents mAb #2 medium UV, 20 g/L.

[0174] Yield loss across the Protein A chromatography step decreased substantially by about 13-19% when the UV increased from 20 to 45% for HCCF titers of 20 g/L, see FIG. 14A. Upon further investigation, the protein loading outside and within the loop is about 10-15 a higher at a UV of 45%, which indicates possible antibody breakthrough on the second column in the loading zone as indicated in Table V. When the HCCF titer decreases to 15 g/L, yield loss is less pronounced and only about 2%, which is understandable given a similar column loading at both 20% and 45% UV setpoints, see FIG. 14A, Table V. The Protein A step yield is consistent for the 3 g/L feed and is maintained between about 95-100% regardless of an increase in UV or column loading (FIG. 14A, Table V). One hypothesis for the sensitivity of high titer HCCF feeds to AUV setpoint could be the slope of the actual antibody breakthrough is much steeper than the prediction given by the pore diffusion model. This could lead to underestimation of the antibody breakthrough and hence yield loss across the second column in the loading zone. In addition, the yield loss could also be larger due to the higher titer multiplied by the breakthrough volume will result in an increased amount of antibody lost in the flowthrough compared to lower titer HCCF feeds.

TABLE-US-00006 TABLE V Protein A chromatography yield and protein loading on the column outside and inside of the loop using three different types of HCCF feeds with the column loading controlled by a UV setpoint range of 20-70%. Yield Protein Loading (g/L) Feed Sample (%) Outside of Loop Within Loop mab 1, 15 g/L, 20% 88 84 53 low UV 90 81 53 94 80 53 15 g/L, 45% 89 84 53 15 g/L, 70% 79 94 62 84 89 60 31 g/L, 20% 96 74 51 97 84 51 96 77 51 31 g/L, 45% 81 90 58 31 g/L, 70% 78 105 72 83 105 73 mab 1, 3 g/L, 70% 95 74 52 high UV 3 g/L, 45% 100 57 44 3 g/L, 20% 96 47 38 mAb 2, 20 g/L, 20% 100 93 63 medium UV 20 g/L, 45% 84 106 62 20 g/L, 70% 87 103 68

[0175] The UP-SEC purity of each FNVIP pool was consistent and independent of UV range from 20-70%, see FIG. 14B. The HCP levels were consistent for both 3 a and 20 g/L feeds but seemed to vary by up to about 9,000 ppm for the 15 and 31 a mAb 1, low UV feeds, see FIG. 14C. The residual Protein A ligand increased slightly by about 3-10 ppm at a UV equal to 70% for the 15 and 31 g/L mAb 1, low UV feeds, see FIG. 14D. The residual Protein A ligand levels were similar for the 3 g/L feed regardless of AUV level, see FIG. 14D. For the 20 g/L feed, the residual Protein A ligand level varied from 5-20 ppm for UV range of 20-70%. The change in UV setpoint did not have a large impact on product quality of the FNVIP pools for HCCF titers up to 31 g/L and was independent of cell culture UV280 background absorbance.

[0176] According to one embodiment, a method of separating a protein from a harvested cell culture fluid (HCCF) is defined. The method comprises feeding the HCCF into a continuous chromatography system comprising at least two columns. The system comprising a first UV detector upstream said columns and a second UV detector downstream the column receiving the HCCF and the system is arranged to compare signals registered by the first and second UV sensors to provide a delta UV response indicative of breakthrough of protein through the column.

[0177] Each UV detector has a UV pathlength operating at a UV wavelength, and the system is arranged to switch the feed of HCCF to a different column when the delta UV signal reach a predetermined breakthrough point. The pathlength of the UV detector is in the range 0.05-2.0 mm, the breakthrough point is in the range 5-90% delta UV response when the UV wavelength is in the range 280-300, and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/l. The pathlength may in particular be selected to be 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.35, 0.50, 1.0, or 2.0 mm

[0178] The protein includes but are not limited to monoclonal antibody, protein conjugates and antibody conjugates. In case where the protein is a monoclonal antibody, the method may comprise adjusting, when initial signal of HCCF is greater than 3.0 AU, the UV cell pathlength and/or UV wavelength until a linear signal is obtained. A linear signal may be obtained by adjusting the UV cell pathlength and/or UV wavelength until the UV signal is below about 2.5 AU.

[0179] The continuous chromatography system may be selected from the group: periodic counter current chromatography, simulated moving bed chromatography, continuous counter-current tangential chromatography, and sequential multi-column continuous chromatography.

[0180] Preferably, the continuous chromatography system is selected to be a periodic counter current chromatography system.

[0181] When the background absorbance is less than 2.0 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 31 g/L, the method may comprise selecting the pathlength to be 2.0 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm. Preferably, the pathlength may be selected to be between 0.05-0.35 mm.

[0182] When the background absorbance is less than 2.1 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/L, the method may comprise selecting the pathlength to be 1.0 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm. Preferably, the pathlength may be selected to be between 0.05-0.20 mm.

[0183] It should be noted that the concentration of the protein may be higher than 41 g/L provided the linearity of the UV absorbance is maintained.

[0184] When the background absorbance is less than 2.0 Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 26 g/L, the method may comprise selecting the pathlength to be 0.5 mm, and the wavelength to be 280 nm. It should be noted that the concentration of the protein may be higher than 26 g/L provided the linearity of the UV absorbance is maintained.

[0185] When the background absorbance is less than 1.2Au and the concentration of the protein in the HCCF is up to 41 g/L, the method comprises selecting the pathlength to be 2 mm, and the wavelength to be 300 nm. It should be noted that the concentration of the protein may be higher than 41 g/L provided the linearity of the UV absorbance is maintained.

[0186] FIG. 15 illustrates UV 300 nm absorbance as a function of UV pathlength in mm. The relationship between linearity of the UV signal and different pathlengths for selected monoclonal antibody concentration in the feed material is shown.

[0187] It should be mentioned that the process of dynamic loading can be applied to fed-batch, intensified, and perfusion antibody cell culture streams. Basically, the dynamic control is feed independent. Furthermore, the claimed methods and systems may also be expanded to include non-antibody modalities and also cover resin modalities, including but not limited to Protein A resin, anion exchange, mixed mode, and HIC. Example of Protein A resins include, but are not limited to, Mabselect, Mabselect Sure, Mabselect Sure PCC, Mabselect Sure LX, Mabselect Xtra, and TOYOPEARL AF-rProtein A HC-650F.

[0188] Abbreviations

[0189] PCC: Periodic counter-current chromatography

[0190] 3C-PCC: Three column periodic counter-current chromatography

[0191] UV: Ultraviolet

[0192] DBC: Dynamic binding capacity

[0193] RP-HPLC: Reverse phase high performance liquid chromatography

[0194] HCCF: Harvested cell culture fluid

[0195] UP-SEC: Ultra performance size exclusion chromatography

[0196] Med: Medium

[0197] mAb: Monoclonal antibody

[0198] HCP: Host cell protein

[0199] SMB: Simulated moving bed chromatography

[0200] SMCC: Sequential multi-column chromatography

[0201] HP-IEX: High performance ion exchange chromatography

[0202] FNVIP: Filtered neutralized viral inactivated Protein A product

REFERENCES 1. Anderson, N. G., Practical Use of Continuous Processing in Developing and Scaling Up Laboratory Processes. Org. Process Res. Dev., 2001. 5(6): p. 613-621.

[0203] 2. Laird, T., Continuous Processes in Small-Scale Manufacture. Org. Process Res. Dev., 2007. 11(6): p. 927.

[0204] 3. Masak, J., Ganapathy Subramanian (Ed.): Continuous Processing in Pharmaceutical Manufacturing. Chem. Listy. 109(6): p. 475.

[0205] 4. Allison, G., Regulatory and Quality Considerations for Continuous Manufacturing. Presentation at the International Symposium on Continuous Manufacturing of Pharmaceuticals: Implementation, Technology, & Regulatory (Cambridge, Mass.), 2014.

[0206] 5. Chatterjee, S., FDA Perspective on Continuous Manufacturing. Presentation at the IFPAC Annual Meeting (Baltimore, Md.), 2012.

[0207] 6. Hernandez, R., Continuous Manufacturing: A Changing Processing Paradigm. BioPharm International, 2015. 28(4): p. 20-27, 41.

[0208] 7. Godawat, R., et al., End-to-end integrated fully continuous production of recombinant monoclonal antibodies. J Biotechnol. 213: p. 13-9.

[0209] 8. Li, L., et al., A single-use, scalable perfusion bioreactor system. BioProcess Int., 2009. 7(6): p. 46, 48, 50, 52-54.

[0210] 9. Voisard, D., et al., Potential of cell retention techniques for large-scale high-density perfusion culture of suspended mammalian cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 2003. 82(7): p. 751-765.

[0211] 10. Walther, J., et al. Multi-staged experimental design for efficient process development of a continuous perfusion cell culture: American Chemical Society.

[0212] 11. Angarita, M., et al., Twin-column CaptureSMB: a novel cyclic process for protein A affinity chromatography. J Chromatogr A. 1389: p. 85-95.

[0213] 12. Godawat, R., et al., Periodic counter-current chromatographydesign and operational considerations for integrated and continuous purification of proteins. Biotechnol. J. 7(12): p. 1496-1508.

[0214] 13. Lacki, K. M. and L. M. Bryntesson. Protein A periodic counter-current chromatography for continuous antibody purification. 2004: American Chemical Society.

[0215] 14. Ng, C. K. S., et al., Design of high productivity sequential multi-column chromatography for antibody capture. Food Bioprod. Process. 92(2): p. 233-241.

[0216] 15. Trilisky, E., et al. Capacity assessment: DBC is not the whole storyimplications for resin lifetime and sequential multicolumn chromatography: American Chemical Society.

[0217] 16. Blom, H., et al. The use of dynamic control in periodic counter current chromatography: American Chemical Society.

[0218] 17. Pollock, J., et al., Optimising the design and operation of semi-continuous affinity chromatography for clinical and commercial manufacture. J Chromatogr A. 1284: p. 17-27.

[0219] 18. Warikoo, V., et al., Integrated continuous production of recombinant therapeutic proteins. Biotechnol Bioeng. 109(12): p. 3018-29.

[0220] 19. Cooper, R. S. and D. A. Liberman, Fixed-bed adsorption kinetics with pore diffusion control. Ind. Eng. Chem., Fundam., 1970. 9(4): p. 620-3.