CARBON MATERIAL FOR CATALYST CARRIER OF POLYMER ELECTROLYTE FUEL CELL, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING THE SAME

Abstract

A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell a porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure, has a branch diameter of 81 nm or less, and simultaneously satisfies conditions (A) and (B) whereby: (A) a BET specific surface area S.sub.BET is from 400 to 1500 m.sup.2/g; and (B) with respect to a relationship between a mercury pressure P.sub.Hg and a mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured by mercury porosimetry, an increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the measured mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg is from 0.82 to 1.50 cc/g in a case in which the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg has increased from 4.3 to 4.8. A method of producing this kind of a carbon material for a catalyst carrier is also provided.

Claims

1. A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, which is a porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure, having a branch diameter of 81 nm or less, and simultaneously satisfying the following conditions (A) and (B): (A) a BET specific surface area S.sub.BET obtained by a BET analysis of a nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm is from 400 to 1500 m.sup.2/g; and (B) with respect to a relationship between a mercury pressure P.sub.Hg (kPa) and a mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured by mercury porosimetry, an increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the measured mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg is from 0.82 to 1.50 cc/g in a case in which a common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg has increased from 4.3 to 4.8.

2. The carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein a nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8 adsorbed between a relative pressure p/p.sub.0 from 0.4 to 0.8 in the nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm is from 100 to 300 cc(STP)/g.

3. The carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein a full width at half maximum G of a G-band peak detected in the vicinity of 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum is from 50 to 70 cm.sup.1.

4. The carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 1, wherein the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the measured mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg is from 0.85 to 1.40 cc/g in a case in which the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg has increased from 4.3 to 4.8.

5. A method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, the method comprising: producing an acetylide by blowing an acetylene gas into a reaction solution comprising an aqueous ammonia solution of silver nitrate, to synthesize silver acetylide, a first heat treatment of heat-treating the silver acetylide at a temperature of from 40 to 80 C. to prepare a silver particle-encapsulated intermediate; a second heat treatment of causing a self-decomposing and explosive reaction of the silver particle-encapsulated intermediate at a temperature of from 120 to 400 C., to yield a carbon material intermediate; a washing treatment of bringing the carbon material intermediate into contact with an acid to clean the carbon material intermediate; and a third heat treatment of heat-treating the cleaned carbon material intermediate in a vacuum, or an inert gas atmosphere, at a temperature of from 1400 to 2300 C. to yield a carbon material for a catalyst carrier, wherein, in producing the acetylide, a concentration of silver nitrate in the reaction solution is adjusted to from 10 to 28% by mass at a time of preparing the reaction solution, and a temperature of the reaction solution is raised to from 25 to 50 C.

6. The method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 5, wherein, in producing the acetylide, the acetylene gas is blown into the reaction solution from a plurality of blow-in ports.

7. The method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 6, wherein the acetylene gas is blown into the reaction solution from from two to four blow-in ports.

8. The method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 6, wherein the plurality of blow-in ports for blowing the acetylene gas into the reaction solution are arranged along a liquid surface rim of the reaction solution at regular intervals.

9. The method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 7, wherein the plurality of blow-in ports for blowing the acetylene gas into the reaction solution are arranged along a liquid surface rim of the reaction solution at regular intervals.

10. The carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell according to claim 2, wherein a full width at half maximum G of a G-band peak detected in the vicinity of 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum is from 50 to 70 cm.sup.1.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0061] FIG. 1 is a graph showing the relationship between the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg and the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg of carbon materials for a catalyst carrier of Experimental Example 21, and Experimental Examples 25, 27, 30, and 31 of the present disclosure measured by mercury porosimetry.

[0062] FIG. 2 is a photograph showing the measurement method of measuring a branch diameter, when a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure was observed with SEM.

[0063] FIG. 3 is an explanatory diagram showing a method of measuring a branch diameter of a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure.

[0064] FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing an example of a device for blowing an acetylene gas into a reaction solution in an acetylide producing step of the present disclosure.

DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS

[0065] An example of a preferred Embodiment with respect to a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell of the present disclosure and a producing method therefor will be described in detail below.

[0066] A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell of the present disclosure is a porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure, which has a branch diameter of 81 nm or less, and satisfies the following (A) and (B) at the same time:

(A) a BET specific surface area S.sub.BET obtained by a BET analysis of a nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm is from 400 to 1500 m.sup.2/g; and
(B) with respect to the relationship between a mercury pressure P.sub.Hg and a mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured by mercury porosimetry, an increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured, in a case where the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg is increased from 4.3 to 4.8, is from 0.82 to 1.50 cc/g.

[0067] In this regard, the unit of a mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg is herein cc/g, and the unit of a mercury pressure P.sub.Hg is kPa. Further, the unit of a nitrogen gas adsorption amount is cc(STP)/g, the unit of a BET specific surface area S.sub.BET is m.sup.2/g, the unit of a branch diameter is nm, and the unit of the full width at half maximum of a G-band peak is cm.sup.1.

[0068] A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure may be a porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure. A porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure is preferably including a dendritic carbon nanostructure. Specifically, the dendritic carbon nanostructure is yielded from a silver acetylide having a three-dimensional dendritic structure as an intermediate. With respect to the carbon material for a catalyst carrier, the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET is from 400 m.sup.2/g to 1,500 m.sup.2/g, and preferably from 500 m.sup.2/g to 1,400 m.sup.2/g. When the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET is less than 400 m.sup.2/g, there is a risk that it becomes difficult to support catalyst metal fine particles at a high density in the pores. Meanwhile, when it is allowed to exceed 1,500 m.sup.2/g, the durability tends to be lowered as the crystallinity decreases substantially.

[0069] In this regard, a dendritic carbon nanostructure is a dendritic carbon structure having a branch diameter of 10 nm or more and several 100 s nanometers or less (for example, 500 nm or less, and preferably 200 nm or less). The branch diameter is measured as in Examples described below using a scanning electron microscope (SEM; SU-9000 manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation), and SEM images at 5 visual fields (size 2.5 m2 m) were observed at 100000-fold magnification. Branch diameters were measured at 20 positions in each visual field, and the mean value of total 100 measurements is regarded as the branch diameter. The branch diameter is determined as the thickness of a branch of interest measured at the center between the adjacent two branch points (the middle part of the branched branch) (refer to FIG. 2, D in FIG. 2 stands for a branch diameter at one position). Referring to FIG. 3, the method of measuring a branch diameter will be described. In FIG. 3, one branch of interest is shown. For this branch of interest, the branch point BP 1 and the branch point BP 2 are specified. Next the specified branch point BP 1 and branch point BP 2 are connected with a line segment, and the thickness (width) of the branch is measured on the perpendicular bisector BC of the line segment connecting the branch point BP 1 and the branch point BP 2. The measured thickness of the branch is a branch diameter D at one position.

[0070] For a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure, with respect to the relationship between a mercury pressure P.sub.Hg and a mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured by mercury porosimetry, an increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured, in a case where the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg is increased from 4.3 to 4.8, is from 0.82 to 1.50 cc/g, and preferably from 0.85 cc/g to 1.40 cc/g. When the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg is less than 0.82 cc/g, it becomes difficult to improve the high current (heavy-load) characteristics. When it exceeds 1.50 cc/g, there arises a risk that a dendritic structure developed in a step of applying a shear force for improving the dispersibility during production of a catalyst ink, or in a thermocompression bonding step of bonding a catalyst layer to a proton conductive membrane, may be destructed mechanically, and micropores in a catalyst layer may collapse.

[0071] From the viewpoint of the gas diffusibility inside micropores to be formed in the catalyst layer, a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure preferably exhibit a nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8 adsorbed between the relative pressure p/p.sub.0 of from 0.4 to 0.8 in the nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm from 100 cc(STP)/g to 300 cc(STP)/g, and more preferably from 120 cc(STP)/g to 250 cc(STP)/g. Furthermore, from the viewpoint of improving the crystallinity to improve the durability, the full width at half maximum G of a G-band peak detected at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum is preferably from 50 cm.sup.1 to 70 cm.sup.1, and more preferably from 50 cm.sup.1 to 65 cm.sup.1. When the nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8 is less than 100 cc(STP)/g, the pore volume of meso-size pores supporting catalyst metal fine particles becomes small, and there arises a risk that the gas diffusibility in micropores formed in a catalyst layer also decreases to increase the reaction resistance. On the contrary, when it exceeds 300 cc(STP)/g, the carbon wall forming the pores becomes too thin, and the mechanical strength of the material may be impaired to cause material destruction at an electrode producing step. When the full width at half maximum G of the G-band peak is less than 50 cm.sup.1, the crystallinity becomes excessively high to reduce the ruggedness of the pore walls, and the adsorbability of the catalyst metal fine particles to the pore wall may decrease. On the contrary, when it exceeds 70 cm.sup.1, the crystallinity is too low, and the durability may decrease.

[0072] In the case where a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure is a dendritic carbon nanostructure, silver acetylide, which is a production intermediate, has a branch diameter of 81 nm or less, as measured using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). The branch diameter is preferably from 59 nm to 81 nm, and more preferably from 63 nm to 73 nm. As to the branch diameter of the silver acetylide, it is preferable that the diameter is relatively thin insofar as the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET and the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg are not impaired. However, when the branch diameter is less than 59 nm, improvement of the high current (heavy-load) characteristics may not be attained in some cases. Also, when the branch diameter becomes so thick to exceed 81 nm, the aimed improvement of the high current (heavy-load) characteristics becomes hardly attainable.

[0073] With respect to the method of producing a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure, unlike the conventional method, it is important to prepare a silver acetylide with a three-dimensional dendritic structure having a relatively small branch diameter and a uniformly increased number of branches. In order to synthesize such a silver acetylide, the concentration of silver nitrate in a reaction solution including an ammoniac aqueous solution of silver nitrate at the time of preparing the reaction solution in the acetylide producing step is adjusted to from 10% by mass to 28% by mass, (preferably from 15% by mass to 25% by mass). In addition, the temperature of the reaction solution is raised to from 25 C. to 50 C. (preferably from 35 C. to 47 C.). When the concentration of silver nitrate in the reaction solution at the time of preparation of the reaction solution is less than 10% by mass, the branch diameter of the silver acetylide to be prepared is not sufficiently reduced. On the contrary, when it exceeds 28% by mass, not only it becomes difficult to improve the high current (heavy-load) characteristics, but also the BET specific surface area may decrease rapidly. When the temperature of the reaction solution exceeds 50 C., the branch diameter becomes excessively thin and there arises a risk that the high current (heavy-load) characteristics may not be improved.

[0074] Furthermore, in the above acetylide producing step, in order to react acetylene blown into the reaction solution with silver nitrate in the reaction solution as uniformly as possible, it is preferable to blow an acetylene gas into the reaction solution through a plurality of blow-in ports (more preferably through 2 to 4 blow-in ports). Further, it is preferable that these plural blow-in ports are arranged at regular intervals along the surface rim of the reaction solution. When an acetylene gas is blown into the reaction solution in this manner through a plurality of blow-in ports, and especially in a case where the plural blow-in ports are located at regular intervals from each other along the surface rim of the reaction solution, preparation of a silver acetylide with a three-dimensional dendritic structure having a relatively small branch diameter and a uniformly increased number of branches becomes surer.

[0075] A method of blowing an acetylene gas into the reaction solution will be described referring to FIG. 4. FIG. 4 is a schematic view showing an example of a device for blowing an acetylene gas into a reaction solution in an acetylide producing step. A reaction vessel 100 shown in FIG. 4 is provided with an agitator 51 and blow-in ports 31A, 31B, 31C, and 31D for blowing in an acetylene gas into the reaction solution 11 contained in the reaction vessel 100. The reaction vessel 100 shown in FIG. 4 contains the reaction solution 11. The reaction solution 11 is a silver nitrate-containing ammoniac aqueous solution prepared by containing silver nitrate and an ammoniac aqueous solution. The tips of the blow-in ports 31A to 31D are respectively positioned below the surface 11A of the reaction solution 11, and along the rim of the surface 11 A of the reaction solution 11. The blow-in ports 31A to 31D are arranged at regular intervals from each other. The blow-in ports 31A to 31D have a structure in which an acetylene gas can be blown into the reaction solution 11 from the tips of the blow-in ports 31A to 31D. In the reaction container 100, an acetylene gas is blown into the reaction solution 11 through the blow-in ports 31A to 31D, while the reaction solution 11 contained in the reaction container 100 is stirred with the agitator 51. By blowing an acetylene gas through the blow-in ports 31A to 31D, a silver acetylide with a three-dimensional dendritic structure having a small branch diameter and a uniformly increased number of branches is prepared in the reaction solution 11.

[0076] In the above, referring to FIG. 4, a method of blowing an acetylene gas using four blow-in ports has been described, but the number of blow-in ports is not limited to four. Insofar as a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure can be obtained, the number of blow-in ports may be one, or three. Alternatively, the number of the blow-in ports may be five or more. Further, an acetylene gas may be blown through at least one blow-in port among a plurality of blow-in ports (for example, four blowing ports as shown in FIG. 4).

[0077] The ammonia concentration of an ammoniac aqueous solution composing the reaction solution during preparation of a reaction solution in the above-described acetylide producing step is conceivably correlated with the reaction rate for forming silver acetylide. In other words, it is conceivable that an ammonium ion having good affinity to a nitrate anion dissociates a silver ion from a nitrate anion in a process of forming silver acetylide, so that the reaction rate for forming silver acetylide is enhanced. Therefore, the ammonia concentration of the ammoniac aqueous solution may be adjusted appropriately corresponding to a concentration of silver nitrate, without any particular limitation. For example, the ammonia concentration of the ammoniac aqueous solution is preferably not less than half, but not more than 5 times as much as the silver nitrate concentration (% by mass) in the reaction solution, and usually not more than 20% by mass (preferably not more than 15% by mass, and more preferably not more than approx. 10% by mass).

[0078] A silver acetylide prepared as above is used as a production intermediate. After yielding a production intermediate, a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure, which is a porous carbon material with a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure (specifically, carbon material for a catalyst carrier including dendritic carbon nanostructures), may be prepared through a method similar to the conventional method.

[0079] That is, a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure may be obtained by a producing method having the following steps.

[0080] A (first heat treatment step) where the silver acetylide is heat-treated at a temperature of from 40 to 80 C. (preferably from 60 to 80 C.) to prepare a silver particle-encapsulated intermediate;

[0081] a (second heat treatment step) where the prepared silver particle-encapsulated intermediate is heat-treated at a temperature of from 120 to 400 C. (preferably from 160 to 200 C.) to eject the silver particles to prepare a carbon material intermediate containing the silver particles; and subsequently;

[0082] a (washing treatment step) where the prepared carbon material intermediate containing the silver particles is brought into contact with an acid, such as nitric acid, or sulfuric acid, to clean the same by removing the silver particles and the like in the carbon material intermediate; and

[0083] a (third heat treatment step) where the cleaned carbon material Intermediate is heat-treated in a vacuum or an inert gas atmosphere at from 1400 to 2300 C. (preferably from 1500 to 2300 C.).

[0084] A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure has a three-dimensionally branched three-dimensional dendritic structure suitable for a catalyst carrier, and is preferably a porous carbon material incliging a dendritic carbon nanostructure. This material is equivalent, or superior to conventional similar dendritic carbon nanostructures in terms of BET specific surface area, and durability. Furthermore, since with respect to a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure, the branch diameter of the three-dimensional dendritic structure is smaller, a reactive gas can diffuse without resistance in a catalyst layer prepared using the carbon material as a catalyst carrier. Also, micropores suitable for discharging the water generated in the catalyst layer (generated water) without delay are formed. Therefore, the carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure is capable of improving remarkably the high current (heavy-load) characteristics in a polymer electrolyte fuel cell (significant increase in the output voltage at high current).

EXAMPLES

[0085] A carbon material for a catalyst carrier of the present disclosure and the production method therefor will be specifically described below based on Experimental Examples.

[0086] The measurements of the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET, increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount by mercury porosimetry, nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8, and full width at half maximum G of a G-band peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum, and a branch diameter of carbon materials for a catalyst carrier prepared in the following Experimental Examples were respectively conducted as follows.

[0087] [Measurement of BET Specific Surface Area, and Nitrogen Gas Adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8]

[0088] Approximately 30 mg of the carbon material for a catalyst carrier produced or prepared in each of the Experimental Examples was weighed out and dried in a vacuum at 120 C. for 2 hours. Thereafter, nitrogen gas adsorption isotherm was measured using an automatic specific surface area measuring device (BELSORP-MAX, manufactured by MicrotracBEL Corp.) using a nitrogen gas as an adsorbate. The BET specific surface area was calculated by carrying out the BET analysis in the p/p.sub.0 range of from 0.05 to 0.15 of the adsorption isotherm.

[0089] Also, the difference between the adsorption amount when the p/p.sub.0 of the adsorption isotherm was 0.8, and the adsorption amount when the p/p.sub.0 was 0.4 was calculated, and used as the value of V.sub.N:0.4-0.8.

[0090] [Measurement of Increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of Mercury Absorption amount in Mercury Porosimetry]

[0091] From 50 to 100 mg of the carbon material for a catalyst carrier produced or prepared in each of the Experimental Examples was weighed out and compressed lightly to form an aggregate as a sample for an analysis. The thus formed sample was placed in a sample container for a measuring device (AUTOPORE IV 9520, manufactured by Shimadzu Corporation), in which mercury was intruded under conditions of from the initial introductory pressure of 5 kPa up to the maximum intrusion pressure of 400 MPa. From the relationship between the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the then mercury pressure P.sub.Hg and the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg was found.

[0092] [Measurement of Full Width at Half Maximum G of G-band Peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of Raman Spectrum]

[0093] Approximately 3 mg of the carbon material for a catalyst carrier produced or prepared in each of the Experimental Examples was weighed out. The sample was mounted on a laser Raman spectrophotometer (model NRS-3100 manufactured by Jasco Corporation), and a measurement was carried out under measurement conditions: excitation laser: 532 nm, laser power: 10 mW (sample irradiation power: 1.1 mW), microscope arrangement: backscattering, slit: 100 m100 m, objective lens: 100, spot diameter: 1 m, exposure time: 30 sec, observation wavenumber: from 2000 to 300 cm.sup.1, and cumulative number: 6. From the obtained 6 spectra, the respective full widths at half maximum G of the G-band peaks in the vicinity of 1580 cm.sup.1 were determined, and the mean value thereof was regarded as a measured value.

[0094] [Measurement of Branch Diameter (Nm)]

[0095] The sample of the carbon material for a catalyst carrier prepared in each of Experimental Examples 1 to 24 was set on a scanning electron microscope (SEM; SU-9000 manufactured by Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation). Then SEM images at 5 visual fields (size 2.5 m2 m) were observed at 100000-fold magnification, and branch diameters were measured at 20 positions on an image in each visual field, and the mean value of total 100 measurements was regarded as the branch diameter. For the branch diameter to be measured, the diameter at the center between the adjacent two branch points (the middle part of the branched branch) of a branch of interest was measured and regarded as the branch diameter. Referring to FIG. 2, D in FIG. 2 stands for a branch diameter to be measured.

Experimental Examples 1 to 11

(1) Silver Acetylide Producing Step

[0096] First, a reaction solution including an aqueous ammonia solution containing silver nitrate was prepared, in which silver nitrate was dissolved in an aqueous ammonia solution at the concentrations shown in Table 1. In this case, the ammonia concentration of the ammoniac aqueous solution was made equal to the concentration of silver nitrate until the concentration of silver nitrate of 10% by mass (ammonia concentration 10% by mass). When the concentration of silver nitrate exceeded 10% by mass, the ammonia concentration was fixed at 10% by mass. Into the reaction solution an inert gas, such as argon or nitrogen, was blown for 40 to 60 min to replace dissolved oxygen with the inert gas to eliminate the risk of explosion of the silver acetylide produced in the silver acetylide producing step.

[0097] An acetylene gas was blown into the reaction solution prepared in this way such that the reaction time was about 10 min. An acetylene gas was blown in at a reaction temperature of 25 C. with stirring from one blow-in port while adjusting the blowing amount and blowing rate, and when the acetylene gas began to emit as bubbles from the reaction solution, the acetylene gas blow was discontinued. When silver nitrate and acetylene in the reaction solution were allowed to react further, a white precipitate of silver acetylide was formed.

[0098] The formed precipitate of silver acetylide was recovered by filtration through a membrane filter. The recovered precipitate was redispersed in methanol and filtrated again, and the collected precipitate was transferred into a petri dish, and impregnated with a small amount of methanol to complete silver acetylide with respect to each of Experimental Examples 1 to 11 (Experiment Symbols M1 to M11).

(2) First Heat Treatment Step

[0099] Approximately 0.5 g of silver acetylide yielded in the above silver acetylide producing step of each Experimental Example in a state impregnated with methanol was placed in a stainless steel cylindrical container with a diameter of 5 cm as it was. This was then placed in a vacuum electric heating furnace and dried in a vacuum at 60 C. for about from 15 to 30 min to prepare a silver particle-encapsulated intermediate derived from silver acetylide of each of Experimental Example.

(3) Second Heat Treatment Step

[0100] Next, the 60 C. silver particle-encapsulated intermediate obtained in the first heat treatment step immediately after the vacuum drying was directly, without taking out from the vacuum electric heating furnace, heated to a temperature of 200 C. In the course of the heating, a self-decomposing and explosive reaction of silver acetylide was induced to prepare a carbon material intermediate including a composite of silver and carbon.

[0101] In the course of this self-decomposing and explosive reaction, silver nano-sized particles (silver nanoparticles) are formed. At the same time, a carbon layer with a hexagonal layer plane is formed surrounding such a silver nanoparticle to form skeleton with a three-dimensional dendritic structure. Furthermore, the produced silver nanoparticles are made porous by explosion energy and erupted outward through pores in the carbon layer to form silver aggregates (silver particles).

(4) Washing Treatment Step

[0102] The carbon material intermediate including the composite of silver and carbon obtained in the second heat treatment step was subjected to a washing treatment with a 60% by mass concentrated nitric acid. By this washing treatment, silver particles and unstable carbon compounds present on the surface of the carbon material intermediate were cleaned off

(5) Third Heat Treatment Step

[0103] The carbon material intermediate cleaned in the washing treatment step was heat-treated in an inert gas atmosphere at the heating temperature set forth in Table 1 for 2 hours to yield a carbon material for a catalyst carrier of each of Experimental Examples. The heat treatment temperature in the third heat treatment step is a temperature heretofore generally adopted for the control of crystallinity. By this heat treatment, a change in the physical property and an influence on the battery characteristics of the carbon material derived from the silver acetylide of each Experimental Example were examined.

[0104] With respect to the carbon material for a catalyst carrier prepared as above in each of Experimental Examples 1 to 11, the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount in the mercury porosimetry, the nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8, the full width at half maximum G of the G-band peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum, and the branch diameter were measured.

[0105] The results are shown in Table 2.

Experimental Examples 12 to 17

[0106] As shown in Table 1, the concentration of the silver nitrate was changed to 20% by mass, the reaction temperature was changed in the range of from 25 to 50 C., and the number of blow-in ports in blowing an acetylene gas was set at 2 or 4 in the above acetylide producing step for synthesizing silver acetylide. Except the above, the acetylide producing step, the first heat treatment step, the second heat treatment step, the washing treatment step, and the third heat treatment step were carried out in the same manner as in Experimental Examples 1 to 11 to prepare the respective carbon materials for a catalyst carrier of Experimental Examples 12 to 17 (Experiment Symbols M12 to M17).

[0107] With respect to the carbon material for a catalyst carrier prepared as above in each of Experimental Examples 12 to 17, the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount in the mercury porosimetry, the nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8, the full width at half maximum G of the G-band peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum, and the branch diameter were measured.

[0108] The results are shown in Table 2.

Experimental Examples 18 to 24

[0109] The concentration of the silver nitrate was fixed at 25% by mass, the reaction temperature was fixed at 45 C., and the number of blow-in ports in blowing an acetylene gas was fixed at 4 in the above acetylide producing step for synthesizing silver acetylide. Further, the temperature at the third heat treatment step was changed in the range of 1600 to 2400 C. Except the above, silver acetylide was synthesized in the same manner as in Experimental Examples 1 to 11.

[0110] Using the thus prepared silver acetylide, the first heat treatment step, the second heat treatment step, the washing treatment step, and the third heat treatment step were carried out in the same manner as in Experimental Examples 1 to 11 to prepare the respective carbon materials for a catalyst carrier of Experimental Examples 18 to 24 (Experiment Symbols M18 to M24).

[0111] With respect to the carbon material for a catalyst carrier prepared as above in each of Experimental Examples 18 to 24, the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount in the mercury porosimetry, the nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8, the full width at half maximum G of the G-band peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum, and the branch diameter were measured.

[0112] The results are shown in Table 2.

Experimental Examples 25 to 31

[0113] In addition, commercially available carbon materials were also examined in Experimental Examples 25 to 31.

[0114] As porous carbon materials, a porous carbon material A (KETJENBLACK EC300, produced by Lion Specialty Chemicals Co., Ltd.) (Experimental Example 25), and a porous carbon material B (KETJENBLACK EC600JD, produced by Lion Specialty Chemicals Co., Ltd.) (Experimental Examples 26, 27, and 28), each having a dendritic structure with well-developed pores, and a large specific surface area, were used; as a typical porous carbon material not having a dendritic structure, a porous carbon material C (CNOVEL-MH, produced by Toyo Carbon Co., Ltd.) (Experimental Example 29) was used; and as carbon materials having a well-developed dendritic structure, but not having a porous structure, a carbon material D (acetylene black (AB), produced by Denka Co., Ltd.) (Experimental Example 30), and a carbon material E (conductive grade #4300, produced by Tokai Carbon Co., Ltd.) (Experimental Example 31), were used. With respect to the porous carbon material B, three types were prepared based on the temperature at the third heat treatment, namely the porous carbon material B-1 treated at 1400 C., the porous carbon material B-2 treated at 1800 C., and the porous carbon material B-3 treated at 2000 C.

[0115] With respect to the carbon materials for a catalyst in each of Experimental Examples 25 to 31, the BET specific surface area S.sub.BET, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount in the mercury porosimetry, the nitrogen gas adsorption amount V.sub.N:0.4-0.8, and the full width at half maximum G of the G-band peak at 1580 cm.sup.1 of a Raman spectrum were measured.

[0116] The results are shown in Table 2.

[0117] With respect to the carbon material for a catalyst carrier of Experimental Example 21, and the respective carbon materials of Experimental Example 25 (porous carbon material A), Experimental Example 27 (porous carbon material B-2), and Experimental Examples 30 and 31 (carbon material D and E), a P.sub.Hg-V.sub.Hg graph showing the relationship between the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg (unit: kPa) and the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured by the mercury porosimetry is shown in FIG. 1. In the graph in FIG. 1, the abscissa indicates a logarithmic scale (common logarithm).

[0118] Further, in FIG. 1, the increment V.sub.Hg:4.3-4.8 of the mercury absorption amount V.sub.Hg measured in the mercury porosimetry when the common logarithm Log P.sub.Hg of the mercury pressure P.sub.Hg is increased from 4.3 to 4.8 in Experimental Example 21 is exemplified.

[0119] <<Preparation of Catalyst, Production of Catalyst Layer, Preparation of MEA, Assembly of Fuel Cell, and Evaluation of Battery Performance>>

[0120] Next, using each of the thus produced or prepared carbon materials for a catalyst carrier, catalysts for a polymer electrolyte fuel cell, on which a catalyst metal was supported, were prepared as described below. Further, using an obtained catalyst, an ink solution for a catalyst layer was prepared. Next, using the ink solution for a catalyst layer, a catalyst layer was formed. Further, using the formed catalyst layer a membrane electrode assembly (MEA) was produced, and the produced MEA was fitted into a fuel cell, and a power generation test was performed using a fuel cell measuring device. Preparation of each component and cell evaluation by a power generation test will be described in detail below.

(1) Preparation of Catalyst for Polymer Electrolyte Fuel Cell (Carbon Material Supporting Platinum)

[0121] Each of carbon materials for a catalyst carrier prepared as above, or commercially available carbon materials was dispersed in distilled water, and formaldehyde was added to the dispersion. The dispersion was placed in a water bath set at 40 C., and when the temperature of the dispersion reached the water bath temperature of 40 C., an aqueous nitric acid solution of a dinitrodiamine Pt complex was slowly poured into the dispersion with stirring. Then, stirring was continued for about 2 hours, the dispersion was filtrated, and the obtained solid was washed. The solid obtained in this way was dried in a vacuum at 90 C., then pulverized in a mortar. Next, the solid was heat-treated at 200 C. in an argon atmosphere containing 5% by volume of hydrogen for 1 hour to yield a carbon material supporting platinum catalyst particles.

[0122] The supported platinum amount of the carbon material supporting platinum was regulated to 40% by mass with respect to the total mass of the carbon material for a catalyst carrier and the platinum particles, which was confirmed by a measurement based on inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry (ICP-AES).

(2) Preparation of Catalyst Layer

[0123] The carbon material supporting platinum (Pt catalyst) prepared as above was used. Further, Nafion (registered tradename; produced by DuPont Co., Ltd., persulfonic acid-based ion exchange resin) was used as an electrolyte resin. The Pt catalyst and the Nafion were mixed in an Ar atmosphere, such that the mass of the Nafion solid component is 1.0 times as much as the mass of the carbon material supporting platinum catalyst particles, and 0.5 times as much as non-porous carbon. After stirring gently, the Pt catalyst was crushed by ultrasonic waves. The total solid concentration of the Pt catalyst and the electrolyte resin was adjusted to 1.0% by mass of by adding ethanol, thereby completing a catalyst layer ink solution in which the Pt catalyst and the electrolyte resin were mixed.

[0124] A catalyst layer ink solution for spray coating having a platinum concentration of 0.5% by mass was prepared by adding further ethanol to each catalyst layer ink solution having a solid concentration of 1.0% by mass, which was prepared as above. The catalyst layer ink solution for spray coating was sprayed on a Teflon (registered tradename) sheet after adjustment of spraying conditions such that the mass of platinum per unit area of catalyst layer (hereinafter referred to as platinum basis weight) become 0.2 mg/cm.sup.2. Then, a drying treatment was carried out in argon at 120 C. for 60 min to complete a catalyst layer.

(3) Preparation of MEA

[0125] An MEA (membrane electrode assembly) was produced by the following method using the catalyst layer prepared as above.

[0126] A square electrolyte membrane of 6 cm on a side was cut out from a Nafion membrane (NR 211 produced by DuPont Co., Ltd.). Each of the anode or cathode catalyst layer coated on a Teflon (registered tradename) sheet was cut out with a cutter knife into a square of 2.5 cm on a side.

[0127] Between the anode catalyst layer and the cathode catalyst layer cut out as above, the electrolyte membrane was inserted such that the two catalyst layers sandwich the central part of the electrolyte membrane tightly without misalignment from each other. Then the laminate was pressed at 120 C. under a pressure of 100 kg/cm.sup.1 for 10 min. After cooling down to room temperature, only the Teflon (registered tradename) sheets were peeled off carefully from the respective catalyst layers of the anode and the cathode to complete an assembly of the catalyst layers and the electrolyte membrane, in which the respective catalyst layers of the anode and the cathode are fixed to the electrolyte membrane.

[0128] Next, as a gas diffusion layer, a pair of square carbon paper sheets of 2.5 cm on a side were cut out from carbon paper (35 BC produced by SGL Carbon Co., Ltd.). The assembly of the catalyst layers and the electrolyte membrane was inserted between the carbon paper sheets, such that the respective catalyst layers of the anode and the cathode were placed without misalignment, then the laminate was pressed at 120 C. under a pressure of 50 kg/cm.sup.2 for 10 min, to compete an MEA.

[0129] The basis weights of the catalyst metal component, the carbon material, and the electrolyte material in each of the produced MEA were calculated based on the mass of a catalyst layer fixed to the Nafion membrane (electrolyte membrane) found from the difference between the mass of the Teflon (registered tradename) sheet with the catalyst layer before pressing and the mass of the peeled Teflon (registered tradename) sheet after pressing, and the mass ratio of the components in the catalyst layer.

(4) Evaluation of Performance of Fuel Cell

[0130] An MEA produced using the carbon material for a catalyst carrier produced or prepared in each Experimental Example was fitted into a cell, which was then set on a fuel cell measuring apparatus, and the performance of the fuel cell was evaluated by the following procedure.

[0131] With respect to the reactive gases, on the cathode side air was supplied, and on the anode side pure hydrogen was supplied at a back pressure of 0.10 MPa by regulating the pressure with a back pressure regulating valve placed downstream of the cell so that the respective utilization rates became 40% and 70%. Meanwhile, the cell temperature was set at 80 C., and the supplied reactive gases on both the cathode and anode sides were bubbled through distilled water kept at 80 C. in a humidifier, and the power generation in a low humidification state was evaluated.

[0132] Under such conditions, and supplying the reactive gasses to the cell, the load was gradually increased, and an inter-terminal voltage of the cell was recorded as the output voltage at the then current, after the cell was kept at a current density of 100 mA/cm.sup.2, and 1000 mA/cm.sup.2 respectively for 2 hours, and the power generation performance of the fuel cell was evaluated. The power generation performance of each obtained fuel cell was classified to the following four ranks of A, B, C, and D according to the output voltage at either of current densities. Among the ranks of 100 mA/cm.sup.2 and 1000 mA/cm.sup.2, with respect to the current density of 100 mA/cm.sup.2 the lowest acceptable rank was B, and with respect to the current density of 1000 mA/cm.sup.2 the lowest acceptable rank was C. The results are shown in Table 2.

<Ranking Criteria>

[0133] [Output Voltage at 100 mA/cm.sup.2]
A: The output voltage is not less than 0.86 V.
B: The output voltage is not less than 0.85 V and less than 0.86 V.
C: The output voltage is not less than 0.84 V and less than 0.85 V.
D: The output voltage is inferior to C.
[Output Voltage at 1000 mA/cm.sup.2]
A: The output voltage is not less than 0.65 V
B: The output voltage is not less than 0.62 V and less than 0.65 V.
C: The output voltage is not less than 0.60 V and less than 0.62 V.
D: The output voltage is inferior to C.

[0134] Subsequently, in order to evaluate the durability, a durability test was performed, in which a cycle of operations that the inter-terminal voltage of the cell was kept at 0.6 V for 4 sec, then the inter-terminal voltage of the cell was raised to 1.2 V and held for 4 sec, and then the inter-terminal voltage of the cell was returned to 0.6 V was repeated for 300 cycles.

[0135] After the durability test, the battery performance (output voltage at 1000 mA/cm.sup.2 after the durability test) was measured in the same manner as in the evaluation test of the initial performance before the durability test.

[0136] The output voltage decay rate was calculated by finding the decrement V of the output voltage by deducting the output voltage (V) after the durability test from the output voltage before the durability test, and dividing the decrement V by the output voltage before the durability test, and based on the calculated output voltage decay rate, evaluation was performed on the basis of acceptable ranks A (less than 10%) and B (from 10% to less than 15%), and an unacceptable rank C (higher than 15%). The results are shown in the table.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Synthesis conditions for silver acetylide Temperature at AgNO.sub.3 Reaction 3rd heat Experiment concentration temperature Number of treatment symbol % by mass C. blow-in ports C. Remarks Experimental Example 1 M1 1 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 2 M2 3 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 3 M3 5 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 4 M4 8 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 5 M5 10 25 1 2000 G Experimental Example 6 M6 15 25 1 2000 G Experimental Example 7 M7 20 25 1 2000 G Experimental Example 8 M8 25 25 1 2000 G Experimental Example 9 M9 28 25 1 2000 G Experimental Example 10 M10 30 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 11 M11 35 25 1 2000 N Experimental Example 12 M12 20 25 2 2000 G Experimental Example 13 M13 20 25 4 2000 G Experimental Example 14 M14 20 35 4 2000 G Experimental Example 15 M15 20 40 4 2000 G Experimental Example 16 M16 20 45 4 2000 G Experimental Example 17 M17 20 50 4 2000 G Experimental Example 18 M18 25 45 4 1600 G Experimental Example 19 M19 25 45 4 1800 G Experimental Example 20 M20 25 45 4 1900 G Experimental Example 21 M21 25 45 4 2100 G Experimental Example 22 M22 25 45 4 2200 G Experimental Example 23 M23 29 45 4 2300 N Experimental Example 24 M24 25 45 4 2400 N Experimental Example 25 Porous carbon material A 1800 N Experimental Example 26 Porous carbon material B-1 1400 N Experimental Example 27 Porous carbon material B-2 1800 N Experimental Example 28 Porous carbon material B-3 2000 N Experimental Example 29 Porous carbon material C 1800 N Experimental Example 30 Carbon material D N Experimental Example 31 Carbon material E N

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Battery power generation characteristics Carbon material for a catalyst carrier and durability Branch Ranking Ranking Experiment S.sub.BET V.sub.Hg: 4.3-4.8 V.sub.N: 0.4-0.8 G diameter at 100 at 1000 Dura- symbol m.sup.2/g cc/g cc(STP)/g cm.sup.1 nm mA/cm.sup.2 mA/cm.sup.2 bility Remarks Experimental Example 1 M1 1150 0.71 85 58 84 B D A N Experimental Example 2 M2 1140 0.73 90 58 86 B D A N Experimental Example 3 M3 1130 0.72 90 57 84 B D A N Experimental Example 4 M4 1110 0.81 110 58 82 C C A N Experimental Example 5 M5 1100 0.82 120 58 80 B C A G Experimental Example 6 M6 1090 0.82 135 58 76 B B A G Experimental Example 7 M7 1080 0.85 150 58 72 B A A G Experimental Example 8 M8 1080 0.88 165 59 70 B A A G Experimental Example 9 M9 1090 0.91 180 56 70 B A A G Experimental Example 10 M10 360 <0.1 20 45 120 D D A N Experimental Example 11 M11 290 <0.1 15 45 124 D D A N Experimental Example 12 M12 1070 0.95 160 59 70 B A A G Experimental Example 13 M13 1070 0.97 165 60 70 B A A G Experimental Example 14 M14 1070 1.07 175 61 68 B A A G Experimental Example 15 M15 1060 1.25 180 62 66 A A A G Experimental Example 16 M16 1060 1.33 185 62 64 A A A G Experimental Example 17 M17 1050 1.42 175 63 60 A B A G Experimental Example 18 M18 1480 1.31 285 69 64 A A B G Experimental Example 19 M19 1320 1.32 235 66 64 A A B G Experimental Example 20 M20 1190 1.34 215 64 64 A A B G Experimental Example 21 M21 580 1.15 175 58 64 A B A G Experimental Example 22 M22 450 0.94 145 54 62 B B A G Experimental Example 23 M23 385 0.82 95 49 58 D B A N Experimental Example 24 M24 320 0.77 80 41 58 D D A N Experimental Example 25 Porous carbon 410 <0.1 105 52 B D B N material A Experimental Example 26 Porous carbon 1200 <0.1 382 66 B D C N material B-1 Experimental Example 27 Porous carbon 520 <0.1 200 50 B D B N material B-2 Experimental Example 28 Porous carbon 360 <0.1 126 39 D D B N material B-3 Experimental Example 29 Porous carbon 1280 <0.1 28 48 B D A N material C Experimental Example 30 Carbon 85 <0.1 310 42 D D A N material D Experimental Example 31 Carbon 35 <0.1 12 44 D D A N material E

[0137] The entire contents of the disclosures by Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-070830 are incorporated herein by reference.

[0138] All the Document, patent application, and technical standards cited herein are also herein incorporated to the same extent as provided for specifically and severally with respect to an individual Document, patent application, and technical standard to the effect that the same should be so incorporated by reference.