STEEL CORD FOR REINFORCING RUBBER ARTICLE, METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING SAME, AND TIRE
20200055341 ยท 2020-02-20
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
D07B2201/2051
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B1/0613
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B2201/1056
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B2201/2051
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B2201/1044
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B2201/2006
TEXTILES; PAPER
D07B1/0626
TEXTILES; PAPER
International classification
Abstract
Provided is a multi-twisted steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article, the steel cord having cord strength with a small loss as compared to the total strength of filaments constituting the cord and a high rubber penetration. The steel cord includes a plurality of twisted strands in a multi-twisted structure, each strand including a plurality of twisted filaments in two or more layers, in which at least some of the filaments have a tensile strength of 3,000 MPa or more, the steel cord satisfying a filament occupancy of 48% or more and less than 54%, a cord twist angle of 78 or more and less than 84, an average crossing angle between adjacent filaments other than wrapping filaments of less than 17, and a gap between adjacent sheath filaments constituting the strand of 0.065 mm or more.
Claims
1. A steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article, comprising a plurality of twisted strands in a multi-twisted structure, each strand comprising a plurality of twisted filaments in two or more layers, wherein at least some of the filaments have a tensile strength of 3,000 MPa or more; wherein the steel cord satisfies the following: a filament occupancy of 48% or more and less than 54%; a cord twist angle of 78 or more and less than 84; an average crossing angle between adjacent filaments other than wrapping filaments of less than 17; and a gap between adjacent sheath filaments constituting the strand of 0.065 mm or more.
2. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1, wherein the average crossing angle between the adjacent filaments is less than 14.
3. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1, wherein the multi-twisted structure is a 1+n (n=6 or 7) structure comprising one core strand and six to seven sheath strands twisted around the core strand.
4. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 3, wherein a twist direction of the sheath filaments of the core strand is opposite to a twist direction of the sheath filaments of the sheath strands.
5. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 3, wherein a twist direction of sheath filaments of one of the sheath strands is opposite to a twist direction of sheath filaments of another sheath strand adjacent thereto.
6. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
7. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 2, wherein the multi-twisted structure is a 1+n (n=6 or 7) structure comprising one core strand and six to seven sheath strands twisted around the core strand.
8. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 7, wherein a twist direction of the sheath filaments of the core strand is opposite to a twist direction of the sheath filaments of the sheath strands.
9. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 7, wherein a twist direction of sheath filaments of one of the sheath strands is opposite to a twist direction of sheath filaments of another sheath strand adjacent thereto.
10. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 2, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
11. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 3, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
12. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 4, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
13. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 5, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
14. The steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 7, wherein a lamellar orientation angle in a surface layer portion of at least some of the filaments is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less.
15. A tire using the steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1 for reinforcement thereof.
16. A tire using the steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 2 for reinforcement thereof.
17. A tire using the steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 3 for reinforcement thereof.
18. A method for manufacturing a steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article, wherein the steel cord is the steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1, comprising a plurality of twisted strands in a multi-twisted structure, each strand comprising a plurality of twisted filaments in two or more layers; the method comprising subjecting at least some of the filaments constituting the strand after a final wire drawing process to a stress relief annealing process at 250 C. or higher and lower than 300 C.
19. The method for manufacturing a steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 18, wherein the stress relief annealing process is performed after the final wire drawing process without a leveling process.
20. A method for manufacturing a steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article, wherein the steel cord is the steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article according to claim 1, comprising a plurality of twisted strands in a multi-twisted structure, each strand comprising a plurality of twisted filaments in two or more layers; wherein at least some of the filaments constituting the strand are not subjected to a leveling process after the final wire drawing process.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0025]
[0026]
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030]
MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
[0031] Hereinafter, a steel cord for reinforcing a rubber article of the present invention, a method for manufacturing the steel cord, and a tire using the steel cord will be described in more detail with reference to the drawings.
[0032]
[0033]
[0034] The steel cord of the present invention is not restricted to the cord structures illustrated in
[0035] Characteristics of steel cords of the present invention described below are the same for the steel cord 10 in
[0036] In the present embodiment, at least some of the filaments of the steel cord 10 have a tensile strength of 3,000 MPa or more. For example, the core filament 121 and the sheath filament 122 which form the sheath strand 12 of the steel cord 10 have tensile strengths of 3,000 MPa or more. When some of the filaments of the steel cord 10 have a tensile strength of 3,000 MPa or more, the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment can have an enhanced strength. From the viewpoint of enhancing the strength of the steel cord 10, all of the filaments constituting the steel cord 10 preferably have a tensile strength of 3,000 MPa or more.
[0037] The steel cord 10 in the present embodiment has a filament occupancy of 48% or more and less than 54%. The filament occupancy is a value expressed as a percentage obtained by dividing the total cross-sectional area of the filaments constituting the steel cord by the area of the circumcircle of the steel cord and multiplying the obtained value by 100. Thus, the filament occupancy (%)=(total cross-sectional area of the filaments constituting the steel cord)/(area of the circumcircle of the steel cord)100.
[0038] When the filament occupancy is in a range of 48% or more and less than 54%, the steel cord can have an enhanced strength with a high filament packing efficiency and achieve a high rubber penetration. When the filament occupancy is less than 48%, the diameter of the steel cord 10 for achieving the strength required for the steel cord 10 is increased due to the low filament packing efficiency. This results in thickening of the rubber reinforcement layer when the steel cord 10 is used for reinforcing a tire. Thus, such filament occupancy is disadvantageous in view of tire weight saving. When the filament occupancy is 54% or more, the gap between adjacent filaments described later is decreased, which results in poor rubber penetration. A preferred filament occupancy is 48% or more and less than 50%.
[0039] The steel cord 10 of the present embodiment has a cord twist angle of 78 or more and less than 84. As illustrated in
[0040] When the cord twist angle is in a range of 78 or more and less than 84, a steel cord having a small strength loss due to twisting and stable twist properties can be obtained. When the cord twist angle is less than 78, the twisting is strong and the strength loss due to twisting becomes too large that the steel cord cannot obtain a predetermined strength. Here, the strength loss due to twisting means a value obtained by subtracting the percent cord strength exhibition (%) from 100. Thus, the strength loss due to twisting is as following:
Strength loss due to twisting (%)=100percent cord strength exhibition.
The percent cord strength exhibition is a value expressed as a percentage obtained by dividing the strength of the steel cord by the total strength of the filaments constituting the steel cord and multiplying the obtained value by 100. Thus, the percent cord strength exhibition is as following:
Percent cord strength exhibition (%)=(strength of steel cord)/(total strength of filaments constituting steel cord)100.
Preferably, the percent cord strength exhibition is 90% or more. When the percent cord strength exhibition is larger, or when the strength loss due to twisting is smaller, the steel cord can have a cord strength with smaller loss as compared to the total strength of the filaments constituting the cord. When the cord twist angle is 84 or more, the twisting is weak and the twist properties become unstable. Preferably, the cord twist angle is 80 or more and less than 84.
[0041] In the present embodiment, the steel cord 10 has an average crossing angle between adjacent filaments other than wrapping filaments of less than 17. When the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments is less than 17, the strength loss due to twisting can be reduced. For illustration of the crossing angle between adjacent filaments,
[0042] When the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments is 17 or more, the contact pressure between the adjacent filaments during the steel cord being pulled is high, so that the strength loss due to twisting is large. Preferably, the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments is less than 14. When the average crossing angle is less than 14, the strength loss due to twisting can be further reduced.
[0043] In the present embodiment, a gap between adjacent sheath filaments among sheath filaments constituting a strand of the steel cord 10 is 0.065 mm or more. More specifically, as illustrated in an explanatory view of a gap between adjacent sheath filaments of the steel cord 20 in the present embodiment in
[0044] In the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment, the twist direction of the sheath filaments 112 of the core strand 11 is preferably opposite to the twist direction of the sheath filaments 122 of the sheath strands 12. When the twist direction of the sheath filaments 112 of the core strand 11 is opposite to the twist direction of the sheath filaments 122 of the sheath strand 12, the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments can be decreased.
[0045] In the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment, the twist direction of sheath filaments 122 of one sheath strand 12 is preferably opposite to the twist direction of sheath filaments 122 of another sheath strand 12 adjacent thereto. When the twist directions of sheath filaments 122 of adjacent sheath strands 12 are opposite to each other, the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments can be decreased.
[0046] In the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment, at least some of filaments have a lamellar orientation angle in the surface layer portion of 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less. The surface layer portion refers to a region of a filament ranging from the outermost surface to a volume fraction up to 20%. The lamellar orientation angles of the surface layer portions of all the filaments may satisfy the range described above.
[0047] The lamellar orientation angle will be described. When a filament is manufactured, a material of steel wire is drawn, then subjected to a heat treatment, a plating process, and a final wire drawing process to obtain a filament having a predetermined wire diameter. In the final wire drawing process, the crystal structure composed of ferrite and cementite is oriented so that the lamellar orientations of colonies constituting a block align in the wire drawing direction, i.e., the longitudinal direction of the filament. According to studies by the present inventors, it has been found that the lamellar orientation angle of the surface layer portion affects the resistance of the filament to a lateral pressure applied from an adjacent filament. When the lamellar orientation angle of the surface layer portion is 0.0 or more and 6.0 or less, or 12.5 or more and 18.5 or less, then the resistance to a lateral pressure applied on the filament is increased, the percent cord strength exhibition is improved, and the strength loss due to twisting is reduced. The lamellar orientation angle of the surface layer portion can be adjusted to be within the range described above by, for example, adjusting the die angle during the final wire drawing process. The lamellar orientation angle can be measured through observation of the metallographic structure of the filament.
[0048] Next, a method for manufacturing the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment will be described. For filaments constituting each strand, a material of steel wire is drawn, then subjected to a heat treatment, a plating process, and a final wire drawing process to obtain a filament having a predetermined wire diameter. After the final wire drawing process, a stress relief annealing process is performed. Preferably, the stress relief annealing process is performed at a temperature of 250 C. or higher and lower than 300 C. When the stress relief annealing process is performed at a temperature of 250 C. or higher and lower than 300 C., a steel cord having a high strength and a small strength loss due to twisting can be easily obtained. When the stress relief annealing process is performed at a temperature of lower than 250 C., the effect obtained from the stress relief annealing process is small, and the strength loss due to twisting is large. When the stress relief annealing process is performed at a temperature of 300 C. or higher, the stress relief annealing process results in an excessive annealing, which reduces the strength of the filament.
[0049] A leveling process, a processing for applying repetitive bending, for example, through rolls in a staggered arrangement, improves the residual stress and the straightness of a filament. However, repetitive bending to a filament through a leveling process increases processing strains inside the filament and increases the strength loss due to twisting. Thus, in order to reduce the strength loss due to twisting, a leveling process is not performed. Thus, the stress relief annealing process is preferably performed as a process immediately after the final wire drawing process.
[0050] Further, in consideration of the lamellar orientation angle of the surface layer portion of the filament, the drawing conditions are preferably adjusted in the final wire drawing process.
[0051] The steel cord 10 in the present embodiment is suitable for use in reinforcement of tires. However, use of the steel cord 10 in the present embodiment is not limited to tires.
EXAMPLES
[0052] The steel cords of Examples, Conventional Example and Comparative Examples shown in Tables 1 to 3 (all of which are prophetic examples) were examined for the strength loss due to twisting and the rubber penetration. For the steel cords of Examples, Conventional Example and Comparative Examples, the cord structure, the filament occupancy, the twist angle, the average crossing angle, the diameter of filaments constituting the steel cord, the tensile strength of filaments, the twist direction of filaments, and the gap between adjacent sheath filaments were described in combination in the tables. In addition, the presence or absence of a repetitive bending process, i.e., a leveling process after a final wire drawing process and the presence or absence of a stress relief annealing process after a final wire drawing process during manufacturing the filament were also described in combination.
[0053] In Tables 1 to 3, the cord diameter is a value in which the wrapping filament is excluded. Ninety or more percent cord strength exhibition evaluated for the strength loss due to twisting can be said to be a good characteristic. Thirty or more percent rubber penetration/coverage of the surface of core filaments of a core strand evaluated for rubber penetration can be said to be a good characteristic.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Conventional Example Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Cord Structure (3 + 9) + 6 (3 + 7) + 6 (3 + 7) + 6 (3 + 7) + 6 (1 + 5) + 6 (1 + 5) + 6 (1 + 5) + 6 (3 + 9) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 8) + 1 (3 + 8) + 1 (3 + 8) + 1 Core Filament diameter (mm) Core 0.36 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.5 0.5 0.5 strand Sheath 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.5 0.5 0.5 Tensile strength (MPa) Core 3079 3255 3255 3195 2438 2438 2438 Sheath 3079 3025 3025 3037 2438 2438 2438 Lamellar orientation Core 9.9 5.8 5.8 6.2 19.5 19.5 19.5 angle of surface layer Sheath 9.9 13.0 13.0 12.8 27.3 27.3 27.3 portion of filament (deg) Twist direction Core S S S S S Z S Sheath S S S S S Z S Gap between adjacent sheath 0.028 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.088 0.088 0.088 filaments (mm) Sheath Filament diameter (mm) Core 0.36 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.36 0.36 0.36 strand Sheath 0.36 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.36 0.36 0.36 Tensile strength (MPa) Core 3079 3255 3255 3195 3079 3079 3079 Sheath 3079 3025 3025 3037 3079 3079 3079 Lamellar orientation Core 9.9 5.8 5.8 6.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 angle of surface layer Sheath 9.9 13.0 13.0 12.8 11.6 11.6 11.6 portion of filament (deg) Twist direction Core S S S S S S S/Z, alternately Sheath S S S S S S S/Z, alternately Gap between adjacent sheath 0.028 0.076 0.076 0.076 0.075 0.075 0.075 filaments (mm) cord Cord diameter (mm) 4.49 4.29 4.29 4.29 4.49 4.49 4.49 Filament occupancy (%) 54.1 49.4 49.4 49.4 49.8 49.8 49.8 Twist angle (deg) 78.2 82.4 82.4 82.4 81.3 81.3 81.3 Average crossing angle (deg) 14.6 16.1 16.1 16.1 16.2 12.9 6.1 Presence of repetitive bending after wire Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes Yes drawing process Presence of heat treatment after wire drawing No No Yes No No No No process Percent cord strength exhibition (%) 89.9 92.1 93.7 93.2 91.2 91.8 93.0 Rubber penetration/coverage of core surface 1 49 48 50 45 46 44 of core strand (%)
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Comparative Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4 Example 5 Example 6 Cord structure (3 + 8) + 7 (3 + 7) + 6 (3 + 7) + 6 (3 + 8) + 7 (3 + 8) + 7 (3 + 8) + 7 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 7) + 1 (3 + 8) + 1 Core Filament diameter (mm) Core 0.41 0.31 0.31 0.41 0.41 0.43 strand Sheath 0.45 0.41 0.41 0.45 0.45 0.43 Tensile strength (MPa) Core 2935 3086 3086 2935 2935 2820 Sheath 2648 2838 2838 2648 2648 2820 Lamellar orientation angle Core 13.1 8.5 8.5 13.1 13.1 15.2 of surface layer Sheath 18.3 14.3 14.3 18.3 18.3 15.2 portion of filament (deg) Twist direction Core S S S S S Z Sheath S S S S S Z Gap between adjacent sheath 0.060 0.057 0.057 0.060 0.060 0.089 filaments (mm) Sheath Filament diameter (mm) Core 0.28 0.31 0.31 0.28 0.28 0.325 strand Sheath 0.37 0.41 0.41 0.37 0.37 0.325 Tensile strength (MPa) Core 3225 3086 3086 3454 3454 3132 Sheath 3049 2838 2838 3049 3049 3132 Lamellar orientation angle Core 6.5 8.5 8.5 4.6 4.6 8.5 of surface layer Sheath 10.6 14.3 14.3 10.6 10.6 8.5 portion of filament (deg) Twist direction Core S S S S S Z Sheath S S S S S Z Gap between adjacent sheath 0.052 0.057 0.057 0.052 0.052 0.067 filaments (mm) cord Cord diameter (mm) 4.47 4.46 4.46 4.47 4.47 4.49 Filament occupancy (%) 52.4 51.5 51.5 52.4 52.4 50.5 Twist angle(deg) 81.6 82.7 82.7 81.1 77.9 78.3 Average crossing angle(deg) 16.5 16.3 16.3 16.4 21.0 18.0 Presence of repetitive bending after wire Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes drawing process Presence of heat treatment after wire drawing No No Yes No No No process Percent cord strength exhibition (%) 91.2 92.1 95.2 91.0 86.7 88.9 Rubber penetration/coverage of core surface of 11 16 16 11 8 32 core strand (%)
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- Compar- ative ative ative ative ative ative Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- Exam- ple 7 ple 7 ple 8 ple 9 ple 8 ple 10 ple 11 ple 12 ple 9 Cord structure (3 + 7) + (3 + 7) + (3 + 9) + (3 + 7) + (3 + 7) + (3 + 7) + (3 + 7) + (3 + 9) + (3 + 7) + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 6 (3 + 7) + 1 7) + 1 9) + 1 7) + 1 7) + 1 7) + 1 7) + 1 9) + 1 7) + 1 Core Filament Core 0.355 0.33 0.355 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.31 strand diameter Sheath 0.39 0.38 0.355 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.4 0.35 0.38 (mm) Tensile Core 3285 3255 3100 3255 3255 3500 3086 3100 3255 strength Sheath 3285 3025 3100 3025 3025 3300 2838 3100 3025 (MPa) Lamellar Core 7.6 6.1 9.6 6.9 5.8 4.7 8.5 10.3 4.7 orientation Sheath 8.4 13.0 9.6 11.1 13.0 8.0 13.9 9.5 15.2 angle of surface layer portion of filament(deg) Twist Core S S S S S S S S S direction Sheath S S S S S S S S S Gap between adjacent 0.111 0.093 0.028 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.063 0.097 0.076 sheath filaments (mm) Sheath Filament Core 0.355 0.33 0.355 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.31 0.38 0.31 strand diameter Sheath 0.39 0.38 0.355 0.38 0.38 0.38 0.4 0.35 0.38 (mm) Tensile Core 3285 3255 3100 3255 3255 3500 3086 3100 3255 strength Sheath 3285 3025 3100 3025 3025 3300 2838 3100 3025 (MPa) Lamellar Core 7.6 6.1 9.6 6.9 5.8 4.7 8.5 10.3 4.7 orientation Sheath 8.4 13.0 9.6 11.1 13.0 8.0 13.9 9.5 15.2 angle of surface layer portion of filament (deg) Twist Core S S S S S S S S S direction Sheath S S S S S S S S S Gap between adjacent 0.111 0.093 0.028 0.075 0.075 0.075 0.063 0.097 0.076 sheath filaments (mm) cord Cord diameter (mm) 4.63 4.41 4.42 4.28 4.28 4.28 4.40 4.56 4.29 Filament occupancy 47.0 48.1 54.1 49.6 49.6 49.6 50.8 47.7 49.4 (%) Twist angle (deg) 83.1 82.2 79.7 84.1 83.1 82.7 82.8 80.2 82.4 Average crossing 16.4 16.6 14.8 16.5 16.3 17.3 16.2 15.5 16.1 angle (deg) Presence of repetitive bending Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No after wire drawing process Presence of heat treatment after No No No No No No No Yes Yes wire drawing process Percent cord strength exhibition 90.1 91.3 90.7 92.1 91.9 89.4 92.3 90.9 94.8 (%) Rubber penetration/coverage of 95 78 1 44 43 45 24 83 48 core surface of core strand (%)
[0054] As can be seen from Table 1, the steel cords of Examples 1 to 6, where the filament occupancy, the cord twist angle, the average crossing angle between adjacent filaments other than wrapping filament, and the gap between adjacent sheath filaments constituting the strand are in the predetermined ranges, had an improved percent cord strength exhibition and an improved rubber penetration/coverage of the surface of the core filaments of the core strand as compared with Conventional Examples.
[0055] When looking more specifically at Examples 1 to 6, Example 2 is an example where a stress relief annealing process was performed for 3 seconds at 275 C. after the final wire drawing process in contrast to Example 1, and the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Example 1.
[0056] Example 3 is an example where a leveling process was not performed after the final wire drawing process in contrast to Example 1, and the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Example 1.
[0057] Example 4 is an example of a steel cord having a different cord structure than that of Example 1. In Example 5, where the twist direction of the sheath filaments of the core strand is opposite to the twist direction of the sheath filaments of the sheath strand in contrast to Example 4, the crossing angle was reduced and the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Example 4.
[0058] In Example 6, where the twist direction of sheath filaments of one sheath strand is opposite to the twist directions of sheath filaments of another sheath strand adjacent thereto in contrast to Example 4, the crossing angle was reduced and the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Example 4.
[0059] In each Comparative Examples 1 to 4 shown in Table 2, where the strand has a gap between adjacent sheath filaments of less than 0.065 mm, the rubber coverage of the core surface of the core strand was unsatisfactory.
[0060] In Comparative Example 5, where the strand has a gap between adjacent sheath filaments of less than 0.065 mm, the rubber coverage of the core surface of the core strand was unsatisfactory. Furthermore, since the twist angle was 78 or less and the average crossing angle was 17 or more, the percent cord strength exhibition was unsatisfactory.
[0061] In Comparative Example 6, where the average crossing angle was 17 or more, the percent cord strength exhibition was unsatisfactory.
[0062] Comparative Example 7 and Example 7 shown in Table 3 are examples comparing the difference in the filament occupancy. In Example 7, where the filament occupancy satisfied the predetermined range, the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Comparative Example 7. In Comparative Example 7, where the filament occupancy was small, the cord diameter was larger than that of Conventional Example. This results in thickening of the rubber reinforcement layer, which is disadvantageous in view of tire weight saving.
[0063] In Comparative Example 8, where the filament occupancy exceeded the predetermined range, the gap between adjacent sheath filaments was small and the rubber penetration was poor.
[0064] Comparative Example 9 and Example 8 are examples comparing the difference in the cord twist angle. In Comparative Example 9, where the cord twist angle was 84 or more, the twist properties were unstable.
[0065] In Comparative Example 10, where the average crossing angle was 17 or more, the strength loss due to twisting was large.
[0066] In Comparative Example 11, where the gap between adjacent sheath filaments was less than 0.065 mm, the rubber penetration was poor.
[0067] In Comparative Example 12, where the filament occupancy was less than 48%, the cord diameter was large.
[0068] In Example 9, an example where a stress relief annealing process was performed for 3 seconds at 275 C. without performing a leveling process after the final wire drawing process, the percent cord strength exhibition was improved as compared with Example 1.
DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS
[0069] 10 Steel cord [0070] 11 Core strand [0071] 12 Sheath strand [0072] 13 Wrapping filament [0073] 20 Steel cord [0074] 21 Core strand [0075] 22 Sheath strand [0076] 111 Core filament [0077] 112 Sheath filament [0078] 121 Core filament [0079] 122 Sheath filament [0080] 211 Core filament [0081] 212 Sheath filament [0082] 221 Core filament [0083] 222 Sheath filament