Spatial layered transmission method and device

Abstract

The present application provides a spatial layered transmission method and a spatial layered transmission device. The spatial layered transmission method includes steps of: dividing to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data; determining a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data, to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; and encoding each layer of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmitting the encoded layer of spatial data.

Claims

1. A spatial layered transmission method, comprising: dividing to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data; determining a symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data, to enable an error between Symbol Error Rates (SERs) for the at least two layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; and encoding each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmitting the encoded each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data, wherein determining the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data comprises: determining the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion that enables the SERs to be approximately equal to each other, wherein determining the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data in accordance with the equivalent error probability criterion comprises: determining the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

2. The spatial layered transmission method according to claim 1, wherein the symbol rates for the at least two layers of spatial data are different from each other.

3. A spatial layered transmission method, comprising: receiving layers of spatial data, wherein a symbol rate for each of the layers of spatial data is set by a transmitting end, to enable an error between Symbol Error Rates (SERs) for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; decoding the layers of spatial data; and acquiring data transmitted from the transmitting end in accordance with the decoded layers of spatial data, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion that enables the SERs to be approximately equal to each other, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

4. The spatial layered transmission method according to claim 3, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

5. A spatial layered transmission device, comprising: a processor; a memory connected to the processor via a bus interface and configured to store therein programs and data for the operation of the processor; and a transceiver configured to receive and transmit data under control of the processor, wherein in the case that the programs and data stored in the memory are called and executed by the processor, the processor is configured to divide to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data; determine a symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data, to enable an error between Symbol Error Rates (SERs) for the at least two layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; and encode each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmit the encoded each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data, wherein the processor is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion that enables the SERs to be approximately equal to each other, wherein the processor is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of the at least two layers of spatial data through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

6. The spatial layered transmission device according to claim 5, wherein the symbol rates for the at least two layers of spatial data are different from each other.

7. A spatial layered transmission device, comprising: a processor; a memory connected to the processor via a bus interface and configured to store therein programs and data for the operation of the processor; and a transceiver configured to receive and transmit data under control of the processor, wherein in the case that the programs and data stored in the memory are called and executed by the processor, the processor is configured to receive layers of spatial data, wherein a symbol rate for each of the layers of spatial data is set by a transmitting end, to enable an error between Symbol Error Rates (SERs) for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; decode the layers of spatial data; and acquire data transmitted from the transmitting end through the transceiver in accordance with the decoded layers of spatial data, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion that enables the SERs to be approximately equal to each other, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

8. The spatial layered transmission device according to claim 7, wherein the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a spatial layered transmission method at a transmitting end according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(2) FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a spatial layered transmission method at a receiving end according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(3) FIG. 3 is another flow chart of the spatial layered transmission method at the transmitting end according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(4) FIG. 4 is another flow chart of the spatial layered transmission method at the receiving end according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(5) FIG. 5 is a curve diagram of Bit Error Rate (BER) performance for a 3-antenna system;

(6) FIG. 6 is a curve diagram of BER performance for a 4-antenna system;

(7) FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing a spatial layered transmission device according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(8) FIG. 8 is a schematic view showing a base station according to one embodiment of the present disclosure;

(9) FIG. 9 is a schematic view showing another spatial layered transmission device according to one embodiment of the present disclosure; and

(10) FIG. 10 is a schematic view showing a UE according to one embodiment of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE EMBODIMENTS

(11) The present disclosure will be described in details hereinafter in conjunction with the drawings and embodiments.

(12) As shown in FIG. 1, the present disclosure provides in some embodiments a spatial layered transmission method at a transmitting end, including: Step 100 of dividing to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data; Step 110 of determining a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data, to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; and Step 120 of encoding each layer of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmitting the encoded layer of spatial data. In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the SER for the spatial data refers to a post-detection SER for the spatial data.

(13) According to the method in the embodiments of the present disclosure, the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data may be determined in such a manner that the error between the post-detection SERs for the layers of spatial data is smaller than the predetermined error threshold. As a result, it is able to provide different error-correction encoding schemes with different levels of protection for the layers of spatial data, balance the SERs for the layers of spatial data and provide the layers of spatial data with approximately uniform transmission performance, thereby to improve the system performance.

(14) In a possible embodiment of the present disclosure, preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other, so as to provide different levels of error protection for different spatial data streams.

(15) In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data may be determined in various ways, as long as an error between the post-detection SERs for the layers of spatial data is smaller than the predetermined error threshold. Preferably, the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data may be determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(16) The equivalent error probability criterion refers to a principle where the post-detection SERs are approximately equal to each other. To be specific, based on this criterion, the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data may be determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(17) As shown in FIG. 2, the present disclosure further provides in some embodiments a spatial layered transmission method at a receiving end, including: Step 200 of receiving layers of spatial data, a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data being set by a transmitting end so as to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; Step 210 of decoding the layers of spatial data; and Step 220 of acquiring data transmitted from the transmitting end in accordance with the decoded layers of spatial data.

(18) In the embodiments of the present disclosure, the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data is determined so as to enable the error between the SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than the predetermined error threshold, so the error of each decoded layer of spatial data is smaller than the predetermined error threshold. As a result, it is able to improve the system performance.

(19) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

(20) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(21) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(22) The technical solution is provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure for a SIC receiver.

(23) Taking an MIMO system using the technical solution provided in the embodiments of the present disclosure as an example, FIG. 3 shows a transmission procedure at the transmitting end, and FIG. 4 shows a transmission procedure at the receiving end, where L represents the number of turbo encoders, k.sub.i represents the number of signal sources, n.sub.i represents a length of a turbo code, and 1iL. For the symbol rates, R.sub.1>R.sub.2>, . . . , >R.sub.L.

(24) Taking three-antenna and four-antenna systems as examples, to-be-transmitted code words are G.sub.3 and G.sub.4 respectively.

(25) Principles for the G.sub.3-based three-antenna system and the G.sub.4-based four-antenna system may be shown by the following two equations:

(26) TABLE-US-00001

(27) In the case that three antennae are adopted at the transmitting end and the receiving end (i.e., N.sub.T=3 and N.sub.R=3) and the code word G.sub.3 is taken as a transmission matrix, signals received at the received end may be expressed as follows:

(28) $\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{y}_{11}& y_{12}& y_{13}\\ y_{21}& y_{22}& y_{23}\\ y_{31}& y_{32}& y_{33}\end{array}\right]=\sqrt{\frac{}{3}}\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{h}_{11}& h_{12}& h_{13}\\ h_{21}& h_{22}& h_{23}\\ h_{31}& h_{32}& h_{33}\end{array}\right]\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{x}_1& x_2^{*}& x_4\\ x_2& -x_1^{*}& x_3\\ x_4& x_3^{*}& x_1\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{ccc}{v}_{1,1}& v_{1,2}& v_{1,3}\\ v_{2,1}& v_{2,2}& v_{2,3}\\ v_{3,1}& v_{3,2}& v_{3,3}\end{array}\right],\mathrm{and}$$\mathrm{equivalently},\text{.Math.}\left[\begin{array}{c}{y}_{1,1}\\ y_{2,1}\\ y_{3,1}\\ y_{1,2}^{*}\\ y_{2,2}^{*}\\ y_{3,2}^{*}\\ y_{1,3}\\ y_{2,3}\\ y_{3,3}\end{array}\right]=\sqrt{\frac{}{3}}\underset{\underset{\stackrel{}{=}{H}_{\mathrm{equivalent}}}{}}{\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}{h}_{1,1}& h_{1,2}& 0& h_{1,3}& 0\\ h_{2,1}& h_{2,2}& 0& h_{2,3}& 0\\ h_{3,1}& h_{3,2}& 0& h_{3,3}& 0\\ -h_{1,2}^{*}& h_{1,1}^{*}& h_{1,3}^{*}& 0& 0\\ -h_{2,2}^{*}& h_{2,1}^{*}& h_{2,3}^{*}& 0& 0\\ -h_{3,2}^{*}& h_{3,1}^{*}& h_{3,3}^{*}& 0& 0\\ h_{1,3}& 0& h_{1,2}& 0& h_{1,1}\\ h_{2,3}& 0& h_{2,2}& 0& h_{2,1}\\ h_{3,3}& 0& h_{3,2}& 0& h_{3,1}\end{array}\right]}\left[\begin{array}{c}{x}_1\\ x_2\\ x_3\\ x_4\\ x_5\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{c}{v}_{1,1}\\ v_{2,1}\\ v_{3,1}\\ v_{1,2}^{*}\\ v_{2,2}^{*}\\ v_{3,2}^{*}\\ v_{1,3}\\ v_{2,3}\\ v_{3,3}\end{array}\right].$

(29) Identically, in the case that four antennae are adopted at the transmitting end and the receiving end (i.e., N.sub.T=4 and N.sub.R=4), an equivalent channel matrix for G.sub.4 may be expressed as:

(30) $\left[\begin{array}{c}{y}_{11}\\ y_{21}\\ y_{31}\\ y_{41}\\ y_{12}^{*}\\ y_{22}^{*}\\ y_{32}^{*}\\ y_{42}^{*}\\ y_{13}\\ y_{23}\\ y_{33}\\ y_{43}\\ y_{14}^{*}\\ y_{24}^{*}\\ y_{34}^{*}\\ y_{44}^{*}\end{array}\right]=\sqrt{\frac{}{4}}\underset{\underset{\stackrel{}{=}{H}_{\mathrm{equivalent}}}{}}{\left[\begin{array}{cccccccc}{h}_{11}& h_{12}& 0& 0& h_{13}& 0& h_{14}& 0\\ h_{21}& h_{22}& 0& 0& h_{23}& 0& h_{24}& 0\\ h_{31}& h_{32}& 0& 0& h_{33}& 0& h_{34}& 0\\ h_{41}& h_{42}& 0& 0& h_{43}& 0& h_{44}& 0\\ -h_{12}^{*}& h_{11}^{*}& h_{13}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{14}^{*}& 0& 0\\ -h_{22}^{*}& h_{21}^{*}& h_{23}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{24}^{*}& 0& 0\\ -h_{32}^{*}& h_{31}^{*}& h_{33}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{34}^{*}& 0& 0\\ -h_{42}^{*}& h_{41}^{*}& h_{43}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{44}^{*}& 0& 0\\ h_{13}& 0& h_{12}& h_{14}& h_{11}& 0& 0& 0\\ h_{23}& 0& h_{22}& h_{24}& h_{21}& 0& 0& 0\\ h_{33}& 0& h_{32}& h_{34}& h_{31}& 0& 0& 0\\ h_{43}& 0& h_{42}& h_{44}& h_{41}& 0& 0& 0\\ -h_{14}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{13}^{*}& 0& h_{12}^{*}& 0& h_{11}^{*}\\ -h_{24}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{23}^{*}& 0& h_{22}^{*}& 0& h_{21}^{*}\\ -h_{34}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{33}^{*}& 0& h_{32}^{*}& 0& h_{31}^{*}\\ -h_{44}^{*}& 0& 0& h_{43}^{*}& 0& h_{42}^{*}& 0& h_{41}^{*}\end{array}\right]}\left[\begin{array}{c}{x}_1\\ x_2\\ x_3\\ x_4\\ x_5\\ x_6\\ x_7\\ x_8\end{array}\right]+\left[\begin{array}{c}{v}_{11}\\ v_{21}\\ v_{31}\\ v_{41}\\ v_{12}^{*}\\ v_{22}^{*}\\ v_{32}^{*}\\ v_{42}^{*}\\ v_{13}\\ v_{23}\\ v_{33}\\ v_{43}\\ v_{14}^{*}\\ v_{24}^{*}\\ v_{34}^{*}\\ v_{44}^{*}\end{array}\right].$

(31) Obviously, for any MIMO system where N.sub.RR.sub.G, the similar equivalent channel matrices for G.sub.3 and G.sub.4 may be acquired. Then, a ZF algorithm using a Vertical Bell Labs Layered Space-Time (V-BLAST) structure or an Ordered Successive Interference Cancellation (OSIC) algorithm may be used to perform the detection.

(32) Wireless channels between the transmitting antennae and corresponding receiving antennae are independent of each other, and they may obey flat Rayleigh fading. A channel fading coefficient may obey independently and identically complex Gaussian random distribution having a mean value of 0 and a variance of 1, in the case that the receiving end knows all Channel State Information (CSI).

(33) FIG. 5 is a curve diagram of the BER performance for the space-time transmission code word G.sub.3 as the transmission matrix based on 16-Quadrature Amplitude Modulation (QAM), wherein a Multi-Level Coding (MLC) structure and a BICM structure are adopted. In addition, it is compared with the performance of a V-BLAST system having the BICM structure and using Quadrature Phase Shift Keying (QPSK) modulation. A channel encoding symbol rate used by the V-BLAST system is 0.75. For the QO-STBC system having the MLC structure and using G.sub.3 as the transmission matrix, three parallel turbo codes are used for protecting each layer of data by channel coding. Based on a symbol rate selection criterion for MLC encoding, R.sub.1=0.84, R.sub.2=0.7375, R.sub.3=0.53, and an equivalent symbol rate is R.sub.c=0.675. The QO-STBC system having the BICM structure may use a turbo encoder having a symbol rate of 0.675. The three schemes may have an identical spectrum efficiency, i.e., 5/3*4*0.675=3*2*0.75=4.5 bit/s/Hz. As shown in FIG. 6, in the case that an OSIC-based receiver is used and a BER is 110.sup.5, the MLC structure may acquire a gain of about 0.5 dB as compared with the BICM structure, and the transmitting scheme of the present disclosure may acquire a gain of about 3.9 dB as compared with the V-BLAST system. In the case that a Zero Forcing-Linear Detection (ZF-LD) receiver is used and the BER is 110.sup.5, the MLC structure may acquire a gain of about 0.5 dB as compared with the BICM structure, and it may acquire a gain up to 7.3 dB as compared with the V-BLAST system.

(34) In the case that four antennae are adopted by both the transmitting end and the receiving end, the QO-STBC system may use the code word transmission matrix G.sub.4 based on 16-QAM. For the MLC structure, three parallel turbo encoders are used for protecting each layer of data by channel coding, R.sub.1=0.94, R.sub.2=0.81, R=0.58, and an equivalent symbol rate is R.sub.c=0.75. The QO-STBC transmitting structure having the BICM may use a turbo encoder having a fixed symbol rate of R.sub.c=0.75 The V-BLAST system with the BICM structure uses the QPSK modulation and turbo encoder with the symbol rate of 0.75. The three schemes may have an identical system spectrum efficiency, i.e., 8/4*4*0.75=4*2*0.75=6 bit/s/Hz. As shown in FIG. 6, in the case that an OSIC-based receiver is used and a BER is 110.sup.5, the MLC structure may acquire a performance gain of about 1.2 dB as compared with the BICM structure, and the system having the MLC structure and using G.sub.4 may acquire a gain of about 3.2 dB as compared with the V-BLAST system. In the case that a ZF-LD receiver is used and the BER is 110.sup.5, the MLC system using the code word G.sub.4 may acquire a performance gain of 1.3 dB as compared with the QO-STBC system having the BICM structure, and may acquire a performance gain up to 7.8 dB as compared with the V-BLAST system having the BICM structure. At a high Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) region, the QO-STBC system based on the ZF linear receiver and having the MLC structure may have the performance even better than the QO-STBC system based on the SIC receiver and having the BICM structure. As a result, for the QO-STBC system having the MLC structure in the embodiments of the present disclosure, it is able to provide a less complex receiver, and acquire more gain as compared with the BICM system and the V-BLAST system.

(35) Based on an identical inventive concept, the present disclosure further provides in some embodiments a spatial layered transmission device which, as shown in FIG. 7, includes: a spatial division module 701 configured to divide to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data; a symbol rate determination module 702 configured to determine a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data, so as to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; and a data transmission module 703 configured to encode each layer of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmit the encoded layer of spatial data.

(36) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

(37) Preferably, the symbol rate determination module 702 is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(38) Preferably, the symbol rate determination module 702 is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(39) Based on an identical inventive concept, the present disclosure further provides a base station which, as shown in FIG. 8, includes a processor 800, a memory 820 and a transceiver 810. The processor 800 is configured to read a program stored in the memory 820, so as to divide to-be-transmitted data into at least two layers of spatial data, determine a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data so as to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold, encode each layer of spatial data in accordance with the determined symbol rate, and transmit the encoded layer of spatial data through the transceiver 810. The transceiver 810 is configured to receive and transmit data under the control of the processor 800.

(40) In FIG. 8, a bus architecture may include a number of buses and bridges connected to each other, so as to connect various circuits for one or more processors such as the processor 800, one or more memories such as the memory 820, and etc. In addition, as is known in the art, the bus architecture may be used to connect various other circuits, such as a circuit for a peripheral device, a circuit for a voltage stabilizer and a power management circuit. Bus interfaces are provided, and the transceiver 810 may consist of a plurality of elements, i.e., a transmitter and a receiver for communication with various other devices over a transmission medium. The processor 800 may take charge of managing the bus architecture as well as general processing. The memory 820 may store therein data for the operation of the processor 800.

(41) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

(42) Preferably, the processor 800 is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(43) Preferably, the processor 800 is further configured to determine the symbol rate for each layer of spatial data through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(44) Based on an identical inventive concept, the present disclosure further provides in some embodiments a spatial layered transmission device which, as shown in FIG. 9, includes: a data reception module 901 configured to receive layers of spatial data, a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data being set by a transmitting end so as to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold; a decoding module 902 configured to decode the layers of spatial data; and a data acquisition module 903 configured to acquire data transmitted from the transmitting end in accordance with the decoded layers of spatial data.

(45) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

(46) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(47) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(48) Based on an identical inventive concept, the present disclosure further provides in some embodiments a UE which, as shown in FIG. 10, includes a processor 1000, a memory 1020 and a transceiver 1010. The processor 1000 is configured to read a program stored in the memory 1020, so as to: receive layers of spatial data through the transceiver 1010, a symbol rate for each layer of spatial data being set by a transmitting end so as to enable an error between SERs for the layers of spatial data to be smaller than a predetermined error threshold, decode the layers of spatial data; and acquire data transmitted from the transmitting end in accordance with the decoded layers of spatial data. The transceiver 1010 is configured to receive and transmit data under the control of the processor 1000.

(49) In FIG. 10, bus architecture may include a number of buses and bridges connected to each other, so as to connect various circuits for one or more processors such as the processor 1000, one or more memories such as the memory 1020 and etc. In addition, as is known in the art, the bus architecture may be used to connect various other circuits, such as a circuit for a peripheral device, a circuit for a voltage stabilizer and a power management circuit. Bus interfaces are provided, and the transceiver 1010 may consist of a plurality of elements, i.e., a transmitter and a receiver for communication with various other devices over a transmission medium. With respect to different UEs, a user interface 1030 may also be provided for devices which are to be arranged inside or outside the UE, and these devices may include but not limited to a keypad, a display, a speaker, a microphone and a joystick. The processor 1000 may take charge of managing the bus architecture as well as general processing. The memory 1020 may store therein data for the operation of the processor 1000.

(50) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are different from each other.

(51) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined in accordance with an equivalent error probability criterion.

(52) Preferably, the symbol rates for the layers of spatial data are determined through simulation in the case that a predetermined symbol rate constraint has been met.

(53) It should be appreciated that, the present disclosure may be provided as a method, a system or a computer program product, so the present disclosure may be in the form of full hardware embodiments, full software embodiments, or combinations thereof. In addition, the present disclosure may be in the form of a computer program product implemented on one or more computer-readable storage mediums (including but not limited to disk memory, Compact Disc-Read Only Memory (CD-ROM) and optical memory) including computer-readable program codes.

(54) The present disclosure has been described with reference to the flow charts and/or block diagrams of the method, device (system) and computer program product according to the embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be understood that computer program instructions may be used to implement each of the work flows and/or blocks in the flow charts and/or the block diagrams, and the combination of the work flows and/or blocks in the flow charts and/or the block diagrams. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a common computer, a dedicated computer, an embedded processing machine or any other programmable data processing device to create a machine, so that instructions executable by the processor of the computer or the other programmable data processing device may create a device to achieve the functions assigned in one or more work flows in the flow chart and/or one or more blocks in the block diagram.

(55) These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer readable storage that may guide the computer or the other programmable data process devices to function in a certain way, so that the instructions stored in the computer readable storage may create a product including an instruction unit which achieves the functions assigned in one or more flows in the flow chart and/or one or more blocks in the block diagram.

(56) These computer program instructions may also be loaded in the computer or the other programmable data process devices, so that a series of operation steps are executed on the computer or the other programmable devices to create processes achieved by the computer. Therefore, the instructions executed in the computer or the other programmable devices provide the steps for achieving the function assigned in one or more flows in the flow chart and/or one or more blocks in the block diagram.

(57) Although the preferred embodiments are described above, a person skilled in the art may make modifications and alterations to these embodiments in accordance with the basic concept of the present disclosure. So, the attached claims are intended to include the preferred embodiments and all of the modifications and alterations that fall within the scope of the present disclosure.

(58) Obviously, a person skilled in the art may make further modifications and improvements without departing from the spirit of the present disclosure, and these modifications and improvements shall also fall within the scope of the present disclosure.