CUSTOMIZED POLYMER/GLASS DIFFRACTIVE WAVEGUIDE STACKS FOR AUGMENTED REALITY/MIXED REALITY APPLICATIONS
20230228934 ยท 2023-07-20
Inventors
- Sharad D. Bhagat (Austin, TX, US)
- Brian George Hill (Duxbury, MA, US)
- Christophe Peroz (Tokyo, JP)
- Chieh Chang (Cedar Park, TX, US)
- Ling Li (Bellevue, WA, US)
Cpc classification
G02B6/0076
PHYSICS
G02B6/0038
PHYSICS
G02B27/0081
PHYSICS
International classification
Abstract
A diffractive waveguide stack includes first, second, and third diffractive waveguides for guiding light in first, second, and third visible wavelength ranges, respectively. The first diffractive waveguide includes a first material having first refractive index at a selected wavelength and a first target refractive index at a midpoint of the first visible wavelength range. The second diffractive waveguide includes a second material having a second refractive index at the selected wavelength and a second target refractive index at a midpoint of the second visible wavelength range. The third diffractive waveguide includes a third material having a third refractive index at the selected wavelength and a third target refractive index at a midpoint of the third visible wavelength range. A difference between any two of the first target refractive index, the second target refractive index, and the third target refractive index is less than 0.005 at the selected wavelength.
Claims
1.-18. (canceled)
19. A diffractive waveguide stack comprising: a first diffractive waveguide for guiding light in a first visible wavelength range, the first diffractive waveguide comprising a first material and having a first refractive index at a selected wavelength and a first target refractive index at a midpoint of the first visible wavelength range; and a second diffractive waveguide for guiding light in a second visible wavelength range, the second diffractive waveguide comprising a second material and having a second refractive index at the selected wavelength and a second target refractive index at a midpoint of the second visible wavelength range; and a third diffractive waveguide for guiding light in a third visible wavelength range, the third diffractive waveguide comprising a third material and having a third refractive index at the selected wavelength and a third target refractive index at a midpoint of the third visible wavelength range, wherein: the first visible wavelength range comprises red light, the second visible wavelength range comprises green light, and the third visible wavelength range comprises blue light, and a difference between any two of the first target refractive index, the second target refractive index, and the third target refractive index at the selected wavelength is less than 0.005 at the selected wavelength.
20. The diffractive waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the selected wavelength is 589 nm.
21. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the first material differs from the second material and the third material, and the second material differs from the third material.
22. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the first yellowness index is less than about 1.2, the second yellowness index is less that about 0.8, and the third yellowness index is less than about 0.4 at the selected wavelength.
23. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the first material comprises a first copolymer comprising a first monomer and a second monomer, the second material comprises a second copolymer comprising the first monomer and the second monomer, and a ratio of the first monomer and the second monomer in the first copolymer differs from a ratio of the first monomer and the second monomer in the second copolymer.
24. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the first material, the second material, and the third material each independently comprises a polymer or a glass.
25. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein: the first material comprises a first glass, the second material comprises a second glass, and the third material comprises a third glass, wherein the first glass, the second glass, and the third glass are different, or the first material comprises a first polymer, the second material comprises a second polymer, and the third material comprises a third polymer, wherein the first polymer, the second polymer, and the third polymer are different
26. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein a field of view the first diffractive waveguide differs from the field of view of the second diffractive waveguide.
27. The waveguide stack of claim 19, wherein the first material comprises a first polymer and the second material comprises a second polymer.
28. The waveguide stack of claim 27, wherein the first polymer and the second polymer are different.
29. The waveguide stack of claim 27, wherein the first material comprises a first copolymer comprising a first monomer and a second monomer and the second material comprises a second copolymer comprising the first monomer and the second monomer.
30. The waveguide stack of claim 29, where a ratio of the first monomer to the second monomer in the first copolymer differs from a ratio of the first monomer to the second monomer in the second copolymer.
31. The waveguide stack of claim 27, wherein the first material comprises a first additive and the second material comprises a second additive.
32. The waveguide stack of claim 31, wherein the first additive and the second additive are the same, and a ratio of the first additive to the first polymer differs from a ratio of the second additive to the second polymer.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS
[0015]
[0016]
[0017]
[0018]
[0019]
[0020]
[0021]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
[0022] This disclosure relates to the use of optically tuned materials for various color layers (e.g., RGB) in an augmented reality (AR)/mixed reality (MR) diffractive waveguide-based eyepiece to optimize the overall optical performance of the eyepiece. The material for each color waveguide can be tuned for optimal optical properties (refractive index, yellowness index, transmission) according to operating wavelength. Various implementations of glass and polymer-based waveguides configured to achieve optimal optical properties are described.
[0023] Differences in refractive indices (dispersion curve) for a given waveguide material at RGB wavelengths typically result in a different field of view (FOV) for each layer and can limit the overall FOV of a waveguide stack. In addition, materials with higher refractive indices (e.g., glass as well as polymers) tend to exhibit a greater yellowness index (b*), which is related to the optical transmission of a waveguide and overall efficiency of an eyepiece. Above a certain value of yellowness index (b*.sub.lim), the material absorption limits the overall efficiency of an eyepiece due at least in part to light absorption by the bulk of the waveguide. The threshold values of b*.sub.lim are spectrally dependent: b*.sub.lim is different for various colors (R, G, B, C, . . . ) in the order B.sub.TH<G.sub.TH<R.sub.TH. That is, red layers can tolerate higher values of b*.sub.lim compared to green and blue layers.
[0024] To demonstrate the dependency of eyepiece efficiency with b* and wavelength, the threshold values of b* for R, G and B polymer waveguides were obtained by fabricating all three waveguides in LUMIPLUS LPB-1102 polymer (available from Mitsubishi Gas Chemical) with refractive index of 1.71 at 589 and starting b* of 0.3. The waveguides were then exposed to an additional UV dose to induce higher yellowness in the waveguide, and efficiencies for each color were measured as a function of b*. The threshold values of b* were then extracted from the plots of efficiency versus b* for each color by locating the b* position on the plot where efficiencies start to decline noticeably.
[0025] There are various implementations for achieving a suitable combination of refractive index and yellowness index separately for R, G and B layers. A first implementation employs three different waveguide materials, each with a different base material composition. A second implementation employs the same base material for each waveguide and adjusts the chemical composition or synthetic conditions to alter the optical properties. A third implementation combines glass and polymer waveguides. For a higher operating wavelength (e.g. red color, 625 nm), a material with a higher refractive index and higher b* can be used, as the red wavelength is not as sensitive to higher b* values, and desired eyepiece efficiency can still be maintained due to low light absorption by the waveguide. For a lower operating wavelength (e.g. blue color, 455 nm), a material with a lower index at a selected wavelength (e.g., 589 nm) and lower b* can be used, as the refractive index will be higher at 455 nm, and lower b* helps to keep light absorption at the minimum and thereby promote eyepiece efficiency.
[0026] Materials with higher b* and higher refractive index are suitable for red and green waveguide layers. As such, material with a refractive index of 1.71 may not be an ideal choice for red and green waveguide materials, since the refractive indices at green (530 nm) and red (625 nm) wavelengths are lower than 1.75. As depicted in
[0027]
[0028]
[0029]
[0030] Customized RGB polymer waveguides described herein can be fabricated with a multi-head system 700 as depicted in
[0031] In one example, as depicted in
[0032] Although this disclosure contains many specific embodiment details, these should not be construed as limitations on the scope of the subject matter or on the scope of what may be claimed, but rather as descriptions of features that may be specific to particular embodiments. Certain features that are described in this disclosure in the context of separate embodiments can also be implemented, in combination, in a single embodiment. Conversely, various features that are described in the context of a single embodiment can also be implemented in multiple embodiments, separately, or in any suitable sub-combination. Moreover, although previously described features may be described as acting in certain combinations and even initially claimed as such, one or more features from a claimed combination can, in some cases, be excised from the combination, and the claimed combination may be directed to a sub-combination or variation of a sub-combination.
[0033] Particular embodiments of the subject matter have been described. Other embodiments, alterations, and permutations of the described embodiments are within the scope of the following claims as will be apparent to those skilled in the art. While operations are depicted in the drawings or claims in a particular order, this should not be understood as requiring that such operations be performed in the particular order shown or in sequential order, or that all illustrated operations be performed (some operations may be considered optional), to achieve desirable results.
[0034] Accordingly, the previously described example embodiments do not define or constrain this disclosure. Other changes, substitutions, and alterations are also possible without departing from the spirit and scope of this disclosure.