STRUCTURALLY ENHANCED PLASTICS WITH FILLER REINFORCEMENTS

20200032823 ยท 2020-01-30

    Inventors

    Cpc classification

    International classification

    Abstract

    A composition comprising a fluid, and a material dispersed in the fluid, the material made up of particles having a complex three dimensional surface area such as a sharp blade-like surface, the particles having an aspect ratio larger than 0.7 for promoting kinetic boundary layer mixing in a non-linear-viscosity zone. The composition may further include an additive dispersed in the fluid. The fluid may be a thermopolymer material. A method of extruding the fluid includes feeding the fluid into an extruder, feeding additives into the extruder, feeding a material into the extruder, passing the material through a mixing zone in the extruder to disperse the material within the fluid wherein the material migrates to a boundary layer of the fluid to promote kinetic mixing of the additives within the fluid, the kinetic mixing taking place in a non-linear viscosity zone.

    Claims

    1-62. (canceled)

    63. A composition comprising a fluid having a boundary layer; particles in said boundary layer of said fluid, said particles having a sharp conchoidal surface and a complex three-dimensional surface area, said particles having a 2.5 Mohs scale hardness or greater and having a size from nano to micron; wherein said particles comprise from 0.5 wt % to 8 wt % of the composition.

    64. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said complex three-dimensional surface area comprises a smooth, sharp surface.

    65. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said complex three-dimensional surface area comprises a smooth, sharp, blade-like surface.

    66. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said complex three-dimensional surface area comprises a smooth, curved surface.

    67. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles comprise a jet milled material.

    68. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles comprise an impact jet milled material.

    69. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles comprise a ball milled material.

    70. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles comprise a roller milled material.

    71. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles have a hardness sufficient to deform said fluid as it flows around said particles, thereby promoting kinetic mixing through the tumbling or rolling effect of the particles.

    72. The composition of claim 63 wherein said particles promote boundary layer renewal of said flowing fluid by kinetic mixing.

    73. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are selected from a group consisting of porous materials, manmade materials, and naturally occurring minerals.

    74. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles have a diameter that results in particle interaction in a boundary layer of said flowing fluid to achieve one of an increase in additive dispersion in said fluid, or to increase surface quality of said fluid exiting said equipment.

    75. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into said fluid by providing pellets which have said particles contained therein, and forming the fluid from said pellets, said fluid of which has the particles dispersed therein.

    76. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into oil.

    77. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into a paint.

    78. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into a fire retardant.

    79. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into a heat transfer fluid.

    80. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles are incorporated into a pigment.

    81. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said particles have an aspect ratio greater than 0.7.

    82. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said fluid is a plastic.

    83. The composition according to claim 63 wherein said fluid is a polymer.

    Description

    BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

    [0058] FIG. 1 is a diagram of an extruder.

    [0059] FIG. 2A is a graphical explanation of boundary layer concepts.

    [0060] FIG. 2B is a graphical explanation of a low speed or laminar boundary layer.

    [0061] FIG. 3 is a graph showing the effect of Sodium potassium aluminum silicate (Rheolite 800 powder) additive on throughput of thermoplastic through an extruder.

    [0062] FIG. 4 is a graph showing the effect of increasing loading using Perlite additive on throughput of thermoplastic through an extruder.

    [0063] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of increasing loading of wood particles while maintaining a 2 wt % Perlite additive loading on throughput of thermoplastic through an extruder.

    DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

    [0064] During a jet mill process, particles strike each other to form a sharp edge via a conchoidal fracture. Even though some particle size selections will produce different effects with differing polymer selections, it is this edge effect that produces their performance. The edge effect on hard structural particles facilitates the incorporation of fillers, structural fillers, pigments, fibers and a variety of other materials into thermoplastics and polymer material.

    [0065] Materials that will produce sharp edge effects upon jet milling include: pumice, Perlite, volcanic glass, sand, flint, slate and granite in a variety of other mineable materials. There are a variety of man-made materials, such as steel, aluminum, brass, ceramics and recycled and/or new window glass, that can be processed either by jet milling or other related milling processes to produce a sharp edge with small particle sizes. In addition to the listed examples, other materials may also be suitable, provided the materials have sufficient hardness, estimated to be 2.5 on the Mohs hardness scale.

    [0066] It is clear to see by the Mohs hardness scale that there is a variety of materials that are harder than 2.5 that would work as likely candidates to produce sharpened edge effects, thereby working as kinetic mixing particles relating to the boundary layer as well as a structural filler to be incorporated in today's modern plastics, polymers, paints and adhesives. The Mohs scale is presented below.

    TABLE-US-00001 Hardness Mineral Absolute Hardness 1 Talc (Mg.sub.3Si.sub.4O.sub.10(OH).sub.2) 1 2 Gypsum (CaSO.sub.4.2H.sub.20) 2 3 Calcite (CaCO.sub.3) 9 4 Fluorite (CaF.sub.2) 21 5 Apatite (Cas(PO.sub.4).sub.3(OH,C1,F) 48 6 Orthoclase Feldspar (KA1Si308) 72 7 Quartz (SiO.sub.2) 100 8 Topaz (Al.sub.2SiO.sub.4(OHY).sub.2) 200 9 Corundum (Al.sub.2O.sub.3) 400 10 Diamond (C) 1500

    [0067] The Mohs scale is a purely ordinal scale. For example, corundum (9) is twice as hard as topaz (8), but diamond (10) is almost four times as hard as corundum. The table below shows comparison with absolute hardness measured by a sclerometer.

    [0068] On the Mohs scale, a pencil lead has a hardness of 1; a fingernail has hardness 2.5; a copper penny, about 3.5; a knife blade, 5.5; window glass, 5.5; steel file, 6.5. [1] Using these ordinary materials of known hardness can be a simple way to approximate the position of a mineral on the scale.

    TABLE-US-00002 Hardness Substance or Mineral 1 Talc 2 Gypsum 2.5 to 3.sup. Pure gold, silver, aluminum 3 Calcite, copper penny 4 Fluorite .sup.4 to 4.5 Platinum 4 to 5 Iron 5 Apatite 6 Orthoclase 6 Titanium 6.5 Iron pyrite 6 to 7 Glass, vitreous pure silica 7 Quartz .sup.7 to 7.5 Garnet 7 to 8 Hardened steel 8 Topaz 9 Corundum .sup.9 to 9.5 Carborundum 10 Diamond >10 Ultrahard fullerite >10 Aggregated diamond nanorods

    [0069] Mineral processing technologies have been around for centuries and are highly specialized. They have the ability to separate particles by multiple methods as well as shape them into smaller particles. In the case of these highly specialized solids or porous materials to produce the desired three-dimensional blade like characteristics with sharpened edges in an aspect ratio greater than 0.7 the material must be an impact jet milled or jet milled process. Impact jet milling is a process where the process material at high velocity hits a hardened surface to produce a shattering effect of particles. In jet milling, opposing jets cause the process material to impact upon itself to produce a shattering effect, i.e., conchoidal fractures on the material. The efficiency of the kinetic mixing particle due to the resulting with surface sharpness, i.e., bladelike edges (see Appendix 1).

    [0070] A ball mill process tumbles the material in a batch process removing an desired surface characteristic, e.g., sharpness. For use as particles in thermoplastic extrusions, solid minerals or rocks should be refined to particles of 10 to 20 mesh or smaller. This is the typical starting point for feeding material into the impact jet milled or jet milled process. This can be accomplished by a variety of methods that are commonly available and known by the industry to produce desired particle sizes. The preferred mineral or rock should be able to produce conchoidal fracture. This ensures knifelike edge effects with three-dimensional shapes. Refer to Appendix 1 for images of conchoidal fractures. In the case of porous minerals or rocks, the characteristics of the pores being smashed and shattering upon impact during the impact jet or jet milling process creates the three-dimensional knifelike edge shaped particles. Even though rough and uneven surfaces may be sufficient in some mixing applications, in this case, the sharper the particle the better the results. Refer to Appendix 1 for reference particle sizes after jet milling. Man-made materials such as glass, ceramics and metals as well as a variety of other types of materials meeting the minimum hardness of 2.5 by the Mohs scale that produce sharp edges with a three-dimensional shape and an aspect ratio larger than 0.7 can be used. The impact jet or jet milling process typically with these materials produce particles with a mean average of 5-60 m with a single pass. Man-made materials like glass may be processed into the desired three-dimensional sharp edged particles with an aspect ratio of 0.7 and higher by means of a mechanical roller mill smashing the particles rather than jet milling. This is clearly illustrated in the pictures of Appendices of the raw feed small glass particles before jet milling.

    [0071] Particle Surface Characteristics:

    [0072] The mixing efficiency of a particle is increased when surface dynamic characteristics of the particle are increased. Examples of particle surface dynamic characteristics include characteristics such as colloidal fracture that produce sharp bladelike edges, smooth surfaces, roughness or surface morphology, three-dimensional needlelike shape and thin curved surfaces. Increasing surface dynamic characteristics has a twofold effect. The first effect is that surface characteristics and particle geometry of a particle having increased surface dynamic characteristics enhance surface adhesion to the nonslip zone or the sticky or gluey region, which produces resistance to rolling or tumbling of the particle. The second effect of increasing surface dynamic characteristics is an increased resistance of the ability of the particle to roll and tumble, which results in stronger mechanical interaction with the impacting fluid. In the example of a smooth spherical ball rolling across a surface, interaction adhesion with a nonslip zone is minimal and the effects on the polymer do not produce much dynamic mixing. If the material dynamic surface characteristics are increased, the dynamic mixing is increased thereby increasing cohesion forces in the sticky/gluey region, then increased rotational resistance is promoted, which increases the cutting or chopping effects of the sharp bladelike particles' ability to grind and cut during tumbling or rotation, which produces kinetic boundary layer mixing.

    [0073] Examples of desired characteristics for a particle to interact in the boundary layer to promote kinetic mixing are shown in electron microscope images found in the below referenced appendices.

    [0074] Images showing particles exhibiting fracture: [0075] Appendix 1. Ash image is: 7, 8 and 9; and [0076] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4 and 5, Recycled Glass Images: 6 through 12.

    [0077] Even though a variety of materials have the ability to fracture during milling processes, the images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, mentioned immediately above, show the characteristics of colloidal fractures that produce sharp edges.

    [0078] Images showing particles having sharp bladelike edges: [0079] Appendix 1. Ash images: 7, 8 and 9; and [0080] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4 and 5: Recycled Glass Images: 6 through 12.

    [0081] A variety of materials have the ability to fracture. For example, striated or vitreous minerals propagate fracture on striation lines, which limits their ability to produce sharp bladelike characteristics. As an example, minerals such as flint and obsidian do not fracture along striation lines. As a result, historically these minerals have been useful for making objects with sharp edges, e.g., arrowheads, spearheads, knives and even axes. The images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, referenced immediately above, show this characteristic of sharp knife blade-like surface characteristics.

    [0082] Images showing particles having smooth edges: [0083] Appendix 1. Ash images: 7, 8 and 9; and [0084] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4 and 5; Recycled Glass Images: 6 through 12.

    [0085] Smooth edges on a knife blade lowers the resistance needed to cut as well as lowering resistance to the force needed to be applied to the holding device. This is the same principle that is imparted in sharp smooth edges of particles, which allow kinetic mixing to take place while remaining in the boundary layer tumbling or rolling along the sticky or gluey region. If the surface of a particle is sharp and rough, the resistance due to the surface roughness would be enough to remove the particle from the boundary layer by overcoming the cohesive forces produced by the sticky or gluey region. This is why particles having the ability to produce sharp smooth bladelike characteristics can remain in the boundary layer to promote kinetic mixing, as shown in the images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, discussed immediately above, that show this characteristic used for kinetic mixing in the boundary layer.

    [0086] Images showing particles having complex surface geometry: [0087] Appendix 1. Ash images: 7, 8 and 9; and [0088] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4 and 5; Recycled Glass Images: 6 through 12.

    [0089] The complex shapes that are illustrated by the images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, referenced immediately above, show bladelike characteristics with dynamic curves to promote surface adhesion in the sticky or gluey region.

    [0090] The complex three-dimensional surface area of the particle is sufficient to promote tumbling or rolling. The above referenced images that show the ash and the expanded Perlite clearly shows complex surface geometry characteristics used for kinetic mixing in the boundary layer.

    [0091] Images showing particles having needle-like points and curves: [0092] Appendix 1. Ash images: 7, 8 and 9; and [0093] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4 and 5; Recycled Glass Images: 6 through 12.

    [0094] The three-dimensional smooth needle-like tips interact by protruding into the moving fluid region adjacent to the boundary layer to promote tumbling or rolling. The smooth needle-like characteristics create enough fluid force to produce rotation while minimizing the cohesive forces applied by the deformation of the fluid flowing around the particle, thereby overcoming aerodynamic lift forces, which are not sufficient to remove the particle from the sticky or gluey region. The images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, referenced immediately above, clearly show the embodiment of three-dimensional needlelike characteristics used for kinetic mixing in the boundary layer.

    [0095] Images showing particles with surface curves: [0096] Appendix 1. Ash images: 7, 8 and 9; and [0097] Appendix 3. Expanded Perlite Images: 3, 4.

    [0098] The Ash images show a thin smooth curved particle similar to an egg shell. The surface area allows good adhesion to the sticky layer while promoting of dynamic lift on this curved thin particle, which promotes rotation thereby producing kinetic mixing in the boundary layer. The expanded Perlite clearly shows thin curves on a dynamic surface producing kinetic mixing in the boundary layer. The images of Appendix 1 and Appendix 3, referenced immediately above, clearly show the embodiment of thin curved surface characteristics on particles used for kinetic mixing in the boundary layer.

    [0099] Reactive particle shaping of porous materials: [0100] Appendix 2 Ash unprocessed spheres images: 4-6; [0101] Appendix 1 Ash processed images 7, 8 and 9; [0102] Appendix 4 Course processed expanded Perlite images: 1, 2; and [0103] Appendix 3 Finely processed expanded Perlite images: 3, 4.

    [0104] These previously mentioned materials because of their unique surface characteristics, Mohs scale hardness of 5.5, thin curved walls, smooth bladelike shape, with three-dimensional surface geometry have the ability under high pressure to change their physical particle size while maintaining dynamic surface characteristics previously mentioned for kinetic boundary layer mixing. For example particles to large can be swept off the boundary layer into the main fluid where they can undergo fracturing produced by high pressure and fluid turbulence reducing their particle size. The appropriate particle sizes after fracturing will migrate towards the boundary layer because of fluid dynamics where they will come in contact with the sticky or gluey region to promote kinetic boundary layer mixing. In conjunction with this example particles sizing may also take place in the boundary layer against mechanical surfaces caused by fluid impacting pressures. The thin smooth walls while undergoing fracturing produce sharp knifelike blade characteristics regardless of fracture point and the hardness of the material helps maintain three-dimensional surface characteristics to promote tumbling or rolling in the boundary layer.

    [0105] Particle Hardness and Toughness:

    [0106] Mixing blades and high shear mixing equipment are usually made of hardened steel. Polymers are softer when mechanical agitation is applied during mixing. Since particles added to the polymer are passing through the equipment, the particles need the ability to retain their shape in order to function properly. The chemical interactions between molecules have been tested and organized based on their hardness. A minimal hardness of 2.5 starting with copper on the Mohs scale or harder will be sufficient for a single pass particle to be tough enough for this mixing process.

    [0107] Filler particles should be sized proportional to the boundary layer region. The size is usually defined arbitrarily as the point where u=0.99U. Therefore, a particle theoretical starting diameter is the height measured perpendicular to the surface where u=0.99U. There are many factors that add difficulties in calculating the parameters associated with kinetic mixing in the boundary zone, for example: [0108] 1. Filler loading, which produces modified boundary layer interaction. [0109] 2. Heat transfer through the walls creating viscosity differentials. [0110] 3. Shear effects and continually increased compression induced by screw agitation. [0111] 4. Chemical reactions where materials are changing physical properties such as viscosities, density and etc.

    [0112] The dynamics of mixing is one of the most complex mechanical chemical interactions in the process industry. Particle size will vary from product to product and optimization may or may not be needed.

    [0113] The chemical industry has produced test methods and tables for homogeneous liquid and the boundary layer relative thicknesses for calculating fluid flow properties useful for mechanical equipment selection and heat transfer properties. The profile assumption may be used as a starting point for the particle size so that the particle will function in the boundary layer to increase mixing.

    [0114] One approach to selecting a suitable particle size is to determine when a particular particle size creates an adverse boundary layer effect by increasing the drag coefficient. In most processes, this may be identified by monitoring an increase in amp motor draws during the mixing cycle. If the amps increase, then the particle size should be modified in order to overcome increased power consumption.

    [0115] Another approach is to see if agitation speed can be increased without motor amp draw increasing, which illustrates friction reduction by kinetic mixing in the boundary layer. For example, FIG. 4 shows the throughput of a thermoplastic through an extruder at a given screw rpm. It can be seen that the additive of Perlite at 8 wt % increases the RPMs from 19 to 45 of screw over the base material of the extruder. Due to equipment limitations, the upper rpm as well as the increased throughput limit was not able to be ascertained.

    [0116] FIG. 3 shows that the additive of sodium potassium aluminum silicate powder (Rheolite 800 powder) to the base material allows the extruder to be run at higher rpm, reaching a maximum at 29, producing increased throughput with the additive working in the linear viscosity zone.

    [0117] FIG. 5 shows that even when wood content is incrementally increase to 74 wt % with 2 wt % Perlite and 24 wt % plastic mixture, in order to find maximum RPM limitation induced by loading effects could not be reached until 74 wt % wood loading was used, which illustrates superior throughput rates as compared to a 49 wt % wood content without Perlite. This clearly shows the improvement of kinetic mixing in boundary layer where the viscosity is nonlinear.

    [0118] Particle Re-Combining to the Boundary Layer:

    [0119] Particles can be selected to re-interact with the boundary layer if they are swept off into the bulk fluid during mixing. All fluid materials flowing through mechanical agitation take the path of least resistance. The velocity profile is affected in agitation by resistive particles to move in a viscous medium. Therefore, particles that produce resistance to fluid flow are usually directed towards the boundary layer so that the fluid can flow more freely. If the particle size is large, it can become bound in fluid suspension because the cohesive forces in the boundary layer are not sufficient enough to resist fluid velocity force being applied to the boundary layer surface, thereby sweeping the particle back into the fluid suspension. Particles with small sizes will recombine naturally in the boundary layer based on cohesion forces caused by surface roughness to promote kinetic mixing even if the particles become temporarily suspended in the bulk fluid flow.

    [0120] To verify whether the material is actually enhancing mixing, we mixed a light weight compressible material with poor flow properties with high-density polypropylene. The reason this is significant is wood fiber and polypropylene have no chemical attraction and they mixed well with at higher percentage fill levels while increasing throughput of the combined materials illustrated in FIG. 5.

    [0121] A limiting factor associated with extruding wood plastic composites is edge effects, which is where the material shows a Christmas tree like effect on the edges. In some cases, this Christmas tree effect is because of improper mixing and resistance of the material which is dragging on the dye exiting the extruder caused by boundary layer effects producing rough edges. It is common in industry to add lubricants in the formulation to overcome this problem. Lubricants allow the material to flow easier over the boundary layer, thereby allowing the throughput to increase by increasing the rpm of the extrusion screws until the edge effects appear, which indicates a maximum throughput of the process material. Test procedures used that same visual appearance as an indicator of the fastest throughput which was controlled by the extruders screw rpm.

    [0122] Experiment #1

    [0123] Base Formula Measured by Mass Percent [0124] 3 wt % lubricant: a zinc stearate and an ethylene bissteramide wax [0125] 7 wt % Talc: a Nicron 403 from Rio Tinto [0126] 41 wt % Thermooplastic: HDPE with a MFI of 0.5 and a density of 0.953 [0127] 49 wt %: wood filler: a commercially classified 60-mesh eastern white pine purchased from American Wood fibers

    [0128] The materials were dry blended with a 4 diameter by 1.5 deep drum blender for 5 minutes prior to feeding.

    [0129] The extruder was a 35 mm conical counter-rotating twin-screw with a 23 L/D.

    [0130] The process temperature was 320 F., which was constant throughout all runs.

    [0131] Two other materials were used and added to the base formula to prove concept these inert hard fillers were: [0132] 1. Sodium potassium aluminum silicate (volcanic glass), which is a micron powder used as a plastic flow modifier to improve the output as well as to produce enhanced mixing properties for additives. 800 mesh solid material hardness 5.5 Mohs scale hardness (Rheolite 800 powder); and [0133] 2. Expanded Perlite is a naturally occurring siliceous rock used mainly in construction products, an insulator for masonry, light weight concrete and for food additives. 500 mesh porous material hardness 5.5 Mohs scale.

    [0134] Experiment #2

    [0135] Effects of Sodium Potassium Aluminum Silicate (Rheolite 800 Powder) on Throughput. [0136] Baseline material maximum throughput before edge effects appeared rpm 19=13.13 in. [0137] Maximum throughput before edge effects using sodium potassium aluminum powder 0.5 wt %, 22 rpm=15.75 in. an overall increase of throughput 19.9% or approximately 20% [0138] 1 wt %, 23 rpm=15.75 in. and an overall increase of throughput 20.2% [0139] 1 wt %, 27 rpm=18.375 in. and an overall increase of throughput 39.90% [0140] 1 wt %, 29 rpm=19.50 in. and an overall increase of throughput 49.6%
    The graphical results of Experiment #2 may be found in FIG. 3

    [0141] Experiment #3

    [0142] Effects of Perlite on Throughput [0143] Perlite: 8 wt %, rpm 45=21.13 in. an overall increase of throughput 60.90% [0144] Perlite: 16 wt %, rpm 45=19.00 in. an overall increase of throughput 44.8% [0145] Perlite: 25 wt %, rpm 45=15.25 in. an overall increase of throughput 16.2% [0146] Perlite: 33 wt %, rpm 45=13.375 in. an overall increase of throughput 19.0%
    The graphical results of Experiment #3 may be found in FIG. 4.

    [0147] The reason the high percentages of Perlite were chosen was to remove the possibility that this material was just a filler. The edge effects of the three-dimensional knife blades particles interacting with the boundary layer even at 33 wt % still showed an improvement of 19% greater than the base material. Throughputs of the material could have been higher but the rpms limitation on the extruder was 45 and the material was being hand fed that is why we believe at 25% the throughput decreased because of difficulties in feeding such a lightweight material for the first time but by the time we got to 33 wt % we had figured it out.

    [0148] Experiment #4

    [0149] Effects of Wood on Throughput [0150] Baseline material maximum throughput before edge effects appeared rpm 25=17.68 in. [0151] Concentration of Perlite was held constant at the starting point of 2 wt % [0152] Wood: 52 wt %, rpm 45=27.6 in. an overall increase of throughput 56.1% [0153] Wood: 59 wt %, rpm 45=26.25 in. an overall increase of throughput 48.5% [0154] Wood: 64 wt %, rpm 45=24.17 in. an overall increase of throughput 36.7% [0155] Wood: 69 wt %, rpm 45=24.33 in. an overall increase of throughput 37.6% [0156] Wood: 74 wt %, rpm 30=22.25 in. overall increase of throughput 25.8%

    [0157] The graphical results of Experiment #4 may be found in FIG. 5

    [0158] The reason this test was chosen was because the loading of a lightweight natural organic filler into an organic petroleum based material increased, the edge effects of poor mixing. There was no maximum throughput reached on 52 wt %, 59 wt %, 64 wt % and 69 wt % because the rpm were at a maximum until 74 wt % at which time the rpm had to be decreased to 30 rpms to prevent edge effects. The compressible fibers in the extrusion process act like broom sweeps along the boundary layer. The wood fiber is a compressible filler whose density goes from 0.4 g/cm.sup.3 to 1.2 g/cm.sup.3 after extrusion against the wall which have the ability to encapsulate these hard particles in the boundary layer and remove them permanently. It is the effect of the three-dimensional particle shape that holds them in the boundary layer with blades that allow this material to cut softer material and not imbed in the wood fiber, preventing them from being swept away even when the wood fiber is undergoing compression in extrusion process.

    [0159] There was verification that this material operates in the boundary layer and is self-cleaning. The first day of trial runs we ran the materials in the order shown by the graphs. The second day of the trial run before the wood filler experiment under the same conditions, materials and weather the baseline material had a significant increase of throughput.

    [0160] Day one, baseline material maximum throughput before edge effects appeared: [0161] rpm 19=13.13 in.

    [0162] Day two, baseline material maximum throughput before edge effects appeared: [0163] rpm 25=17.68 in. with an overall increase of 34.6%.

    [0164] This was caused by the equipment being polished inside with the high concentrations of Perlite from day one proving itself cleaning the boundary layer. It implies that the material's three-dimensional size and shape with sharpened blade like edges provide excellent kinetic rolling capabilities even if the boundary layers thickness changes slightly due to surface cleaning/polishing because of the surface and continuous compression forces in the dynamic mixing of the extrusion process.

    [0165] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be introduced throughout industry in a variety of ways. For example, in the plastics market: [0166] The particles can be incorporated into pelletized form from the plastics manufacturer and marketed as a production increasing plastic. [0167] The particles can be incorporated into colored pellets by pigment suppliers and marketed as rapid dispersing palletized pigment. [0168] The particles can be incorporated as palletized with filler inorganic or organic and marketed as self wetting filler. [0169] The particles can be incorporated into dry powders and marketed as self wetting powders such as fire retardants, fungicides and fillers etc. [0170] The particles can be incorporated into liquids as a disbursement for liquid pigments, plasticizers, UV stabilizer, blowing agents and lubricants etc.

    [0171] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be utilized by the paint industry: [0172] The particles can be incorporated into paint to increase dispersion properties of pigments, plasticizers, fungicides, UV stabilizers, fire retardants, etc. [0173] The particles can be incorporated into pigments at custom mixing stations found in paint stores to help dispense less material and produce the same color through better mixing and dispersion property mixing. [0174] The particles can be incorporated into dry powders from additives manufacturers to help disperse fire retardants, fillers etc. [0175] The particles can be incorporated into spray cans to increase the mixing along the walls promoting boundary layer mixing. [0176] The particles can be incorporated into two component mixing materials to promote better surface area mixing or boundary layer and liquid to liquid interface boundary layer mixing urethanes, urea and epoxies etc. [0177] The particles can be incorporated into a lubricant package used for cleaning spray equipment through continuous recirculation with chemical cleaners.

    [0178] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be utilized by the lubrication industry.

    [0179] The particles can be incorporated into oils to promote better flow around surfaces by lowering the boundary layer friction zone producing better wetting with no break down of temperature on this additive because it's a solid particle: cars, boats, planes, bicycles internal oil external oil, etc.

    [0180] The particles can be incorporated into oils for whole household cleaning allowing the oil to spread more evenly as a thinner layer less likely to become sticky over time because the layer is thinner.

    [0181] The particles can be incorporated into break fluids, hydraulic fluids of all types producing a better response to fluid motion because the boundary layer moves with kinetic mobility when pressure is applied.

    [0182] The particles can be incorporated into fuel additives promotes better disbursement in the fuel as well as a self-cleaning action due to particles interacting on boundary layers throughout the whole entire flow path of combustion including the exhaust where the particles still have a cleaning effect.

    [0183] The particles can be added as a lubricant and disbursements directly from the refinery. The particles will not only help a car's lubricating effects and cleaning the system but the particles will also increase the lifespan of the gasoline pumps due to residue build up of sludge type material in the boundary layers.

    [0184] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be utilized to increase flow properties. Most liquid material flowing through a pipe, pump system and/or process equipment undergo boundary layer effects based on drag coefficient regardless of the surface geometry which this technology can reduce drag by promoting kinetic boundary layer mixing, with a self-cleaning effect. This will allow pipes and process equipment to perform at optimum levels.

    [0185] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be utilized to increase heat transfer. Because the boundary layer is being kinetically moved it is no longer a stagnant fluid heat transfer zone this increases the heat transfer properties on both sides. Now the stagnant boundary layer has turned into forced convection on both sides not just one, the fluid to fluid and the fluid to surface.

    [0186] The boundary layer kinetic mixing particles can be utilized by the food, pharmaceuticals and agriculture industry. Because the selection of the particles can be approved by food and drug the processing of food through plants into its packaging can be enhanced and process equipment can mix things more thoroughly.

    [0187] Thus, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objectives and attain the ends and advantages mentioned above as well as those inherent therein. While presently preferred embodiments have been described for purposes of this disclosure, numerous changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art. Such changes and modifications are encompassed within the spirit of this invention as defined by the claims.