AQUEOUS COATING COMPOSITION
20200024473 ยท 2020-01-23
Inventors
- Ilse Van Casteren (Echt, NL)
- Ronald Tennebroek (Echt, NL)
- Gerardus Cornelis Overbeek (Echt, NL)
- Jourraine Celestijn (Echt, NL)
Cpc classification
C08G18/7671
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08L75/14
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C09D11/102
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C09D175/16
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/758
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/755
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/0823
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/722
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/672
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C09D175/14
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08L75/16
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
International classification
C08G18/10
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
C08G18/34
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
Abstract
The present invention relates to an aqueous coating composition comprising polyurethane A and vinyl polymer, wherein the polyurethane A comprises as building blocks at least: (a) a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cyclic groups, (b) a non-cyclic aliphatic diisocyanate(s) whereby the non-cyclic aliphatic group connecting the two isocyanate groups has from 4 to 36 carbon atoms, and (c) a component(s) containing an isocyanate-reactive group(s), whereby the summed amount of (a) and (b) is 10 to 60 wt. %, relative to the total weight amount of components used to prepare the polyurethane A; and whereby the weight ratio between (a) and (b) is in the range from 50:50 to 99:1.
Claims
1. An aqueous coating composition comprising polyurethane A and vinyl polymer, wherein the polyurethane A comprising as building blocks at least: (a) a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cyclic groups, (b) a non-cyclic aliphatic diisocyanate(s) whereby the non-cyclic aliphatic group connecting the two isocyanate groups has from 4 to 36 carbon atoms, and (c) a component(s) containing an isocyanate-reactive group(s), whereby the summed amount of (a) and (b) is 10 to 60 wt. %, relative to the total weight amount of components used to prepare the polyurethane A; and whereby the weight ratio between (a) and (b) is in the range from 50:50 to 99:1, and wherein the amount of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone in the aqueous coating composition is less than 3 wt. % by weight of solids content of the coating composition.
2. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of (a) to (b) is from 60:40 to 95:5, preferably from to 65:35 to 90:10.
3. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein component (a) is selected from the group consisting of a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cycloaliphatic groups, polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two aromatic groups and any mixture thereof
4. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein component (a) is a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cycloaliphatic groups.
5. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein component (a) is H12MDI (CAS number 5124-30-1).
6. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 3, wherein the polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two aromatic groups is a mixture of 4,4-methylene bis(phenyl isocyanate) and 2,4-methylene bis(phenyl isocyanate.
7. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein component (b) is a non-cyclic aliphatic C4-C9 diisocyanate(s), preferably C4-C8 diisocyanate(s).
8. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein component (b) is 1,6-diisocyanatohexane (CAS number 822-06-0)).
9. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the polyurethane A is prepared by preparing a neutralized isocyanate-terminated polyurethane pre-polymer which is dispersed in water and which dispersed pre-polymer is subsequently chain-extended with a chain-extending compound selected from the group consisting of hydrazine, a primary diamine(s), a secondary diamine(s), a compound(s) containing a primary amino group and a secondary amino group, and any mixture thereof.
10. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the acid value of the polyurethane A is in the range from 5 to 65 mg KOH/g polyurethane A.
11. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the coating composition has a minimum film formation temperature of lower than 50 C. and containing less than 10 wt. % of coalescent.
12. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the weight ratio of polyurethane to vinyl polymer present in the coating composition is in the range of from 95:5 to 15:85, more preferably from 90:10 to 20:80.
13. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the coating composition comprises a polyurethane vinyl polymer hybrid dispersion.
14. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the amount of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone in the aqueous coating composition is less than 1 wt. % by weight of solids content of the coating composition, preferably less than 0.5 wt. % and even more preferably is 0 wt. %.
15. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the coating composition contains tin in amount of at most 2 ppm.
16. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1, wherein the coating composition preferably contains tertiary amines in amount of at most 1.5 wt. %.
17. The aqueous coating composition according to claim 1 wherein the total amount of polyurethane A and vinyl polymer present in the aqueous coating composition is in the range from 20 to 55 wt. % (relative to the weight of aqueous coating composition).
18. A process for preparing an aqueous coating composition according to claim 1 comprising the following steps: I. preparing an isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer by reacting at least components (a), (b) and (c): (a) a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cyclic groups, (b) a non-cyclic aliphatic diisocyanate(s) whereby the non-cyclic aliphatic group connecting the two isocyanate groups has from 4 to 36 carbon atoms, and (c) a component(s) containing at least one isocyanate-reactive group comprising (c)(i) isocyanate-reactive component(s) containing ionic and/or potentially ionic water-dispersing groups, and/or (c)(ii) an isocyanate-reactive component(s) containing non-ionic water-dispersing groups, and/or (c)(iii) isocyanate-reactive component(s) not comprised by (c)(i) and (c)(ii); (d) adding from 0 to 40 wt. % of diluent in step I, whereby the summed amount of (a) and (b) is 10 to 60 wt. %, relative to the total weight amount of components used to prepare the polyurethane A; and the weight ratio between (a) and (b) is in the range from 50:50 to 99:1; and where the amount of (d) is given relative to (a), (b), (c) and (d); II. either blending the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer with an aqueous phase comprising neutralization agent and optionally comprising further chain extending compound or either neutralizing the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer by adding neutralizing agent to the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer and subsequently (i) adding the neutralized isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer to water optionally comprising further chain extending compound or (ii) adding water optionally comprising further chain extending compound to the neutralized isocyanate-terminated polyurethane prepolymer; and whereby the process comprises feeding to the reactor, at the start of the reaction to prepare the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane pre-polymer, either (A) components (a) and (b) and at least one of the components (c)(i), (c(ii) and (c)(iii), either (B) component (a) and at least two of the components (b), (c)(i), (c(ii) and (c)(iii) or either (C) component (b) and at least two of the components (a), (c)(i), (c(ii) and (c)(iii); and whereby the preparation of the polyurethane A is effected in the presence of <3 wt. % of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidone by weight of the polyurethane A; and whereby (i) the vinyl polymer is introduced into the coating composition before, during or after preparation of the polyurethane and/or (ii) vinyl monomer is added before, during or after preparation of the polyurethane and the vinyl monomer is polymerized in the presence of the polyurethane.
19. Process according to claim 18, wherein the chain-extending of the isocyanate-terminated polyurethane pre-polymer is effected with hydrazine, a primary diamine(s), a secondary diamine(s), a compound(s) containing a primary amino group and a secondary amino group, and any mixture thereof
20. An aqueous coating composition comprising polyurethane A and less than 1 wt. % of 1-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone by weight of solids content of the coating composition, wherein the polyurethane A comprising as building blocks at least: (a) a polyisocyanate(s) containing at least two cyclic groups, (b) a non-cyclic aliphatic diisocyanate(s) whereby the non-cyclic aliphatic group connecting the two isocyanate groups has from 4 to 36 carbon atoms, and (c) a component(s) containing an isocyanate-reactive group(s), whereby the summed amount of (a) and (b) is 10 to 60 wt. %, relative to the total weight amount of components used to prepare the polyurethane A; and whereby the weight ratio between (a) and (b) is in the range from 50:50 to 99:1; wherein the polyurethane A is prepared by preparing a neutralized isocyanate-terminated polyurethane pre-polymer which is dispersed in water and which dispersed pre-polymer is subsequently chain-extended with a chain-extending compound selected from the group consisting of unblocked hydrazine, an unblocked primary diamine(s), an unblocked secondary diamine(s), a compound(s) containing an unblocked primary amino group and an unblocked secondary amino group, and any mixture thereof
21. A substrate having a coating obtained by (i) applying an aqueous coating composition according to claim 1 and (ii) physically drying and optionally curing of the aqueous coating composition to obtain a coating.
22. A substrate according to claim 21, wherein the substrate is selected from the group consisting of wood, metal, plastic, linoleum, concrete, glass and any combination thereof.
23. A substrate according to claim 21, wherein the substrate is wood.
24. A method for coating a substrate selected from the group consisting of wood, metal, plastic, linoleum, concrete, glass and any combination thereof where the method comprises (i) applying an aqueous coating composition according to claim 1; and (ii) physically drying and optionally curing of the aqueous coating composition to obtain a coating.
Description
EXAMPLES
[0113] The following examples were prepared and coatings were obtained and tested. The compositions of the examples and results are as shown in the tables below.
Minimum Film Formation Temperature MFFT
[0114] The MFFT is the lowest temperature at which a polymer or solid portion of an aqueous polymer dispersion (also called latex or emulsion) self-coalesces in the semi-dry state to form a continuous polymer film, which in turn acts as a binder for the rest of the solids in the paint film. At temperatures at and above the MFFT of the polymer a continuous film is formed. At temperatures below its MFFT the polymer cannot coalesce to form a continuous film and thus cannot bind together itself (or any pigments and extenders that may be present) and a cracked, crazed or powdery layer results. MFFT is measured on a Rhopoint MFFT-90 Minimum Film Forming Temperature Instrument using a wet film thickness of 90 m.
[0115] Viscosity was determined with a Brookfield DV-I viscometer (spindle S61, 60 rpm, 23 C.)
Particle Size
[0116] The particle size was determined by photon correlation spectroscopy using a Malvern Zetasizer Nano zs. Samples are diluted until a concentration of approximately 0.1 g disp/liter.
Solids Content
[0117] The solids content of the dispersion was determined on a Mettler Toledo HB43-S Compact Halogen Moisture Analyzer. At the start of the measurement the Moisture Analyzer determines the weight of the sample, the sample is then heated to 130 C. by the integral halogen heating module and the volatile compounds vaporizes. During the drying process the instrument continually measures the weight of the sample. Once drying has been completed, the solids content of the sample is displayed as the final result.
Preparation of a Polyurethane-Vinyl Polymer Hybrid Dispersion
Example 1
[0118] Stage 1: A 1000 cm.sup.3 flask equipped with a thermometer and overhead stirrer was charged with HDI (36.7 g), H12MDI (57.4 g), DMPA (15.2 g), Durez-ter S 1015-62 (236.7 g), BHT (0.5 g) and MMA (104.0 g). The mixture was heated to 85 C. and kept at 85 C. for 2 hours. The NCO-content of the resultant isocyanate-terminated prepolymer was 2.9% (theoretical 3.6%). Then the mixture is cooled to 80 C. and TEA (10.3 g) is added. The NCO/OH molar ratio is 1.79.
[0119] A dispersion of the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer was made by feeding 307 g of the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer mixture over 1 hour to deionised water (526 g) The isocyanate-terminated prepolymer temperature during dispersion was kept at 80 C. and the dispersion temperature was controlled between 25 to 30 C. After dispersing 15.9% hydrazine (18.6 g) was added to the dispersion.
[0120] Stage 2: The radical polymerisation for producing a polyurethane vinyl hybrid dispersion having an urethane/vinyl ratio of 77/23 was carried out as follows:
[0121] To the dispersion prepared in Stage 1 was charged a 70% tert-butylhydroperoxide solution in water (0.26 g) and a 1% FeEDTA solution in water (0.21 g) followed by feeding a 1% iso-ascorbic acid solution in water (14.0 g) over a period of 15 minutes.
[0122] The resultant polyurethane vinyl hybrid dispersion was filtered through 75 micron filtercloths and the specifications are given in Table 2 below.
Examples 2-5 and Comparative Example A-D
[0123] In Examples 2-5 and Comparative Examples A-D the process as described for Example 1 was repeated except that different quantities and different constituents were used These quantities and components are specified below in Table 1. In Examples 2 and 3 a second acrylic phase was introduced by adding extra monomers. Unless specified otherwise, the amounts of the different components are expressed in grams. The specifications of the resulting compositions are represented in Table 2, the film properties in Table 4.
TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Compounds Comp. Ex A Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 Comp. Ex. B Comp. Ex C Comp. Ex D DMPA 15.2 25.4 25.4 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 22.5 Durez-ter S 220.3 1015-62 pTHF1000 345.1 329.1 220.5 205.5 228.6 236.9 PC C2200 294.2 CHDM 13.5 13.5 13.5 13.5 H12MDI 110.5 125.8 135.6 113.3 154.8 208.5 IPDI 185.4 141.7 HDI 80.5 20 38.7 35.4 TMDI 86.7 MMA 104.0 173.3 173.3 75 150 150 150 150 BMA 75 BHT 0.5 0.7 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 NCO/OH ratio 1.79 1.79 1.79 1.75 1.7 1.7 1.7 1.7 prepol NCO % 3.16 4.55 4.43 3.12 4.66 4.78 4.72 4.75 prepolymer TEA 11.4 17.2 17.2 12.7 15.3 15.3 15.3 15.3 Prepolymer 308 230 230 460 487 487 487 487 feed [g] water 416 397 397 788 821 821 821 821 Hydrazine 20.4 21.0 21.4 30.1 47.4 48.7 48.0 48.4 [15.9%] tBHPO[70%] 0.26 0.19 0.19 0.42 0.44 0.44 0.44 0.44 FeEDTA [1%] 0.21 0.16 0.16 0.34 0.36 0.36 0.36 0.36 iAA[1%] 14.04 10.4 10.4 22.5 23.8 23.8 23.8 23.8 MMA 2.sup.nd 63.4 63.4 phase tBHPO[70%] 0.24 0.24 FeEDTA [1%] 0.19 0.19 iAA[1%] 12.7 12.7 Water 100 100
Comparative Example E
[0124] Comparative example E shows that a one-stage prepolymer process does not result in a low viscous polyurethane dispersion when using NMP A 2000 cm3 flask equipped with a thermometer and overhead stirrer was charged with components DMPA (50.8 g), Durez-terS1015-62 (788.9 g), NMP (346.5), HDI (122.41) and H12-MDI (191.5 g). The reaction was heated to 95 C. and kept at this temperature for 2 hours. The NCO content of the resultant isocyanate-terminated prepolymer was 3.4% on solid content (theoretically 3.6%). The prepolymer was cooled to 80 C. and TEA was added (37.9 g).
[0125] A dispersion of the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer was made by feeding 410 g of the isocyanate-terminated prepolymer over 1 hour to deionised water (341.0 g). The isocyanate-terminated prepolymer temperature during dispersion was kept at 80 C. and the dispersion temperature was controlled between 25 to 30 C. During dispersing the viscosity increased rapidly and a white high viscous paste was formed. The reaction was stopped.
Comparative example F
[0126] Comparative example F shows that sequential process, first preparing an adduct of H12MDI with DMPA in monomer, is not possible without NMP. A 1000 cm3 flask equipped with a thermometer and overhead stirrer was charged with components DMPA (15.2 g), MMA (104.0 g), lonol cp (0.4 g) and H12-MDI (57.4). The reaction was heated to 85 C. and kept at this temperature for 2 hours. Reaction product was not soluble in MMA resulting in phase separation and settling and reaction was stopped.
TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Comp. Comp. Comp. Comp. Example Ex. 1 Ex. A Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex. 5 Ex B Ex C Ex D Solids (%) 35 40 35 35 34 35 35 34 35 pH 7.5 7.8 7.0 7.3 7.7 7.8 8.0 7.5 7.5 Viscosity* 1445 71 76 13 1470 50 40 30 30 Particle 147 68 108 81 213 67 68 62 67 size (nm) MFFT ( C.) <5 29 18 29 25 40 55 16 7 *A Brookfield viscosity at 25 C. (mPa .Math. s)
[0127] To 30 g of the final dispersions of Example 1 and Comparative Example A different amounts of coalescent, Dowanol DPM were added in amounts of respectively 0.3 [1%], 0.6 [2%], 0.9 [3%] and 1.2 g [4%].The urethane/acrylic hybrid binders according to the invention show a low minimal film formation temperature and coalescent demand is low as demonstrated in Table 3.
TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 MFFT MFFT MFFT MFFT MFFT [ C.] [ C.] [ C.] [ C.] [ C.] [0% [1% [2% [3% [4% Dowanol Dowanol Dowanol Dowanol Dowanol DPM] DPM] DPM] DPM] DPM] Ex. 1 <5 Comp. 29 25 21 13 <5 Ex. A
[0128] The dispersions prepared in Examples 1-5 and Comparative Examples A-D were formulated as described in Table 4. The formulated compositions were cast onto a Leneta test chart using a wire rod at a wet film thickness of 150 micron. Coalescent was added to the dispersion in such an amount that a continuous defect-free film could be formed at the applied temperature conditions in order to be able to determine the stain resistances of the coating. The cast films were then allowed to dry for 24 hours at room temperature before aging for 16 hours at 50 C. The coatings were allowed to cool to room temperature for 1 hour. The stain resistance of the coated cards towards the following stains were then assessed: ammonia, water, red wine, ethanol (48%), coffee. In all cases, a spot (1 cm.sup.2) of the respective stain was placed on the coating and covered with a piece of filter paper and a watch glass. After the test periods, the spot was gently wiped off with a tissue and the film was assessed for its integrity. This was rated between 0 to 5, where: [0129] Grade 5No change; Test area indistinguishable from adjacent surrounding area. [0130] Grade 4Minor change; Test area distinguishable from adjacent surrounding area, only when the light source is mirrored on the test surface and is reflected towards the observer's eye, e. g. discoloration, change in gloss and color. No change in the surface structure, e.g. swelling, fiber raising, cracking, blistering. [0131] Grade 3Moderate change; Test area distinguishable from adjacent surrounding area, visible in several viewing directions, e. g. discoloration, change in gloss and colour. No change in the surface structure, e.g. swelling, fibre raising, cracking, blistering. [0132] Grade 2Significant change; Test area clearly distinguishable from adjacent surrounding area, visible in several viewing directions, e. g. discoloration, change in gloss and colour. [0133] Grade 1Strong change; Test area clearly distinguishable from adjacent surrounding area, visible in several viewing directions, e. g. discoloration, change in gloss and colour, and/or the surface material being totally or partially removed.
[0134] For comparative example A, 7wt % Dowanol DPM was required to obtain a continuous film starting from a WFT of 150 m.
[0135] Stain resistances of the coating of the Examples versus of the Comparative Example clearly demonstrate that with low amount of coalescent sufficient level and mostly similar level of stain resistances can be achieved. Lowering the amount of Dowanol DPM of Comparative Examples A-D resulted in that no continuous defect-free film could be obtained and hence stain resistances of the coating were very poor.
TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comp. Ex. 1 Ex A Ex. 2 Ex. 3 Ex. 4 Ex 5 Dispersion g 30 30 30 30 30 30 Water g 0 2.2 0 0 0 0 Dowanol g 0.3 2.1 3.0 3.0 2.4 2.7 DPM Solid % 35 35 32 32 31 32 formulation BYK 346 g 0 0 0.12 0.12 0.04 0.2 Stains Ammonia 2 min 5 5 5 5 5 5 Ethanol 1 h 1 1 5 5 1 5 48% Red Wine 6 h 5 5 2 2 5 3 Coffee 1 h 2 3 2 2 3 3 Coffee 16 h 1 1 2 2 2 3 Water 16 h 5 5 5 5 5 5 Water 24 h 5 5 5 5 5 5 Comp Ex B Comp. Ex C Comp. Ex D Dispersion g 30 30 30 Water g 0 0 0 Dowanol g 4.0 3.6 2.7 DPM Solid % 30 31 32 formulation BYK346 g 0.2 0.2 0 Stains Ammonia 2 min 5 5 5 Ethanol 48% 1 h 3 2 2 Red Wine 6 h 3 3 2 Coffee 1 h 4 3 2 Coffee 16 h 3 3 2 Water 16 h 5 5 5 Water 24 h 5 5 5
The results as shown in Table 2 and 4 show that the additional use of HDI results in a MFFT reduction (i.e. <5 C. vs 29 C., Ex 1 vs Comp Ex A and 40 C. vs 55 C., Ex 5 vs Comp Ex B, see Table 2), while, even with a lower amount of coalescent (Dowanol DPM), the resistance against ammonia, red wine and water are maintained at the same level, the resistance against ethanol is maintained at the same level or even improved and the resistance against coffee is only deteriorated to a limited extend. Further, additionally comparing Comp Ex C with Comp Ex D shows that the additional use of HDI in case H12MDI is used results in a higher MFFT reduction compared to when IPDI is applied (see Table 2: MFFT reduction due to the use of HDI in case IPDI is used=7 C.; MFFT reduction due to the use of HDI in case H12MDI is used=at least 15 C. (Ex 5 vs Comp Ex B: MFFT reduction of 15 C.; Ex 1 vs Comp Ex A: MFFT reduction is more than 24 C.), while for both IPDI and H12MDI the stain resistances are not significantly affected by the use of HDI.