Pressure regulating apparatus including conduit
10539123 ยท 2020-01-21
Assignee
Inventors
- Neil Turner (Godalming, GB)
- Jack Raymond Tattersall (Victoria, AU)
- Alan Ernest Kinnaird Holbrook (Pulborough, GB)
- Matthew Richard Wickes (Hurstpierpoint, GB)
Cpc classification
F04B41/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04C29/124
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B11/0091
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04C28/28
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04C18/126
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B37/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B39/0055
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
F04B11/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B39/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F04B37/14
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
In situations where a vacuum system is suddenly overloaded, there is a risk of mechanical damage being sustained, for example, bearing damage, gear slippage or rotor and/or stator collisions. Sudden overloads can also lead to electrical damage, for example, over-currents or power surges. Therefore a pressure regulating apparatus is provided for use in a vacuum pumping system having an inlet, an outlet and a conduit interposed between, and in fluid communication with, the inlet and the outlet, wherein the cross-sectional area of the conduit is greater than that required to meet the conductance requirements of the inlet and the outlet.
Claims
1. A manifold suitable for connecting an outlet of a booster pump to an inlet of a backing pump, the manifold comprising: a pressure regulating apparatus comprising: an inlet comprising an inlet orifice; an outlet comprising an outlet orifice; a conduit interposed between, and in fluid communication with, the inlet and the outlet, wherein the cross-sectional area of the conduit is greater than that required to meet conductance requirements of the inlet and the outlet and is configured such that a free volume is provided to accommodate in-rush gases due to pressure differences in the system being pumped prior to the in-rush gases being transferred to the backing pump to thereby reduce pressure build-up between the booster pump and the backing pump during such an in-rush event, and wherein the inlet orifice and the outlet orifice are aligned to at least partially overlap when viewed along a direction, in use, of gas flowing through the pressure regulating apparatus such that there is a direct line of sight through the manifold; a conduit portion having an inlet orifice sealingly connectable, in use, to the outlet of the booster pump, and an outlet orifice sealingly connectable, in use, to the inlet of the backing pump; and at least one expansion chamber portion in fluid communication with the conduit portion, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is between approximately 2 and 30 times volume of the conduit portion.
2. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one of the inlet orifice or outlet orifice comprises a generally planar connection flange connectable, in use, to a connection flange of the booster or backing pump.
3. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is between approximately 5 and 20 times the volume of the conduit portion.
4. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is between approximately 5 and 15 times the volume of the conduit portion.
5. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is between approximately 5 and 10 times the volume of the conduit portion.
6. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is approximately 7.5 times the volume of the conduit portion.
7. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio of the combined interior free volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion to the largest anticipated process chamber volume is at least 0.2% of the ratio of the booster displacement to backing pump displacement.
8. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the ratio of the combined interior free volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion to the largest anticipated process chamber volume is at least 1% of the ratio of the booster displacement to backing pump displacement.
9. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the manifold comprises a main body portion formed generally as a hollow box by a metal casting process.
10. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the conduit portion is internally shaped to provide a smooth and gradual transition between the shape and dimensions of the inlet and outlet apertures.
11. The manifold as claimed in claim 1, wherein the at least one hollow expansion chamber portion extends radially outwardly from the conduit portion.
12. The manifold according to claim 1, further comprising an auxiliary port in fluid communication with the conduit portion.
13. The manifold as claimed in claim 12, wherein the auxiliary port is formed as a through aperture in a side wall of one of the at least one expansion chamber.
14. The manifold according to claim 1, wherein a main body portion of the manifold comprises a structural support member for connection to either or both of the booster pump and the backing pump.
15. A vacuum system comprising: a booster pump comprising an outlet; a backing pump comprising an inlet; and a pressure regulating apparatus comprising: an inlet comprising an inlet orifice; an outlet comprising an outlet orifice; a conduit interposed between, and in fluid communication with, the inlet and the outlet, wherein the cross-sectional area of the conduit is greater than that required to meet conductance requirements of the inlet and the outlet and is configured such that a free volume is provided to accommodate in-rush gases due to pressure differences in the system being pumped prior to the in-rush gases being transferred to the backing pump to thereby reduce pressure build-up between the booster pump and the backing pump during such an in-rush event, wherein the inlet orifice and the outlet orifices are aligned to at least partially overlap when viewed along a direction, in use, of the gas flowing through the pressure regulating apparatus such that there is a direct line of sight through the pressure regulating apparatus, and wherein the inlet of the pressure regulating apparatus is connected to, and in fluid communication with, the outlet of the booster pump and the outlet of the pressure regulating apparatus is connected to, and in fluid communication with, the inlet of the backing pump; a conduit portion having an inlet orifice sealingly connectable, in use, to the outlet of the booster pump, and an outlet orifice sealingly connectable, in use, to the inlet of the backing pump; and at least one expansion chamber portion in fluid communication with the conduit portion, wherein the combined volume of the conduit portion and the at least one expansion chamber portion is between approximately 2 and 30 times volume of the conduit portion.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) An embodiment of the invention shall now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
DETAIL DESCRIPTION
(9) In a known vacuum pumping system 10, a vacuum chamber 12 is connected to a series of pumps 14, 16, that is to say, a booster pump 14 and a backing vacuum pump 16. The vacuum chamber 12 is where a process 18 is carried out, and the interior of the vacuum chamber 12 is accessible via any one or more sealingly-closeable access ports 20. An isolator valve 22 is interposed between the vacuum chamber 12 and the booster pump 14 to allow the two to be isolated from one another so that, for example, one of the access ports 20 can be opened without admitting air into the vacuum pumps 14, 16. Before the process 18 can get underway, the vacuum chamber 12 needs to be evacuate, and so the isolator valve 22 is opened slowly to allow air within the vacuum chamber 12 to be evacuated by the booster 14 and backing vacuum pumps 16 in succession.
(10) When the isolator valve 22 is first opened, the air within the vacuum chamber 12 immediately begins to rush into the vacuum pumps, and if the isolator vale 22 is opened too quickly, excess pressure can build-up between the booster pump 14 and the backing vacuum pump 16 due the difference in their respective maximum throughputs. This can lead to back-pressure working against the booster pump 14 or too high a pressure at the inlet of the backing vacuum pump 16. To combat this, a pressure regulating device 24 is interposed between the booster pump 14 and the backing vacuum pump 16 to limit the pressure at the inlet of the booster pump 16 at the expense of increased back-pressure at the outlet of the booster pump 14 developed between the two pump. The pressure relief valve 24 is only shown schematically in
(11) Booster and backing pumps are usually sold as pre-configured combinations, and so a manifold, such as that shown in
(12) In
(13) A conduit 36 interconnects the inlet 30 and outlet 28 orifices, which is tapered and shaped to provide a smooth transition between the two. It will be noted that the cross-sectional area of the conduit 36 does not exceed that of the larger of the inlet 30 and outlet 28 orifice at any point along its length.
(14) The manifold 26 additionally comprises an auxiliary port 38, in fluid communication with conduit 36 to which auxiliary equipment can be affixed (not shown). The internal diameter of the auxiliary port 38 is relatively small, compared with that of the larger of the inlet 30 and outlet 28 ports, and so its effect on the flow of gas through the conduit 36 is minimal Notably, the inlet 30 and outlet 28 orifices are arranged to overlap so that there is a clear line of sight through the manifold 26 thus minimising restriction to gas flow, in use.
(15) The manifold comprises a solid side arm 40, which projects out from the side wall of the conduit 36 and which has at its distal end 42, a strut 44 that is used to transmit the weight of the pumps 14, 16, in a manner that is known. The strut 44 also carries flanged connector plates 46 at its opposite ends that bolt to structural mounting points of other equipment or the support chassis of the vacuum system 10.
(16) The invention, as shown in
(17) Turning now to
(18) The size of the free volume 64, or the expansion chamber is maximised by shaping the manifold 50 of the invention to occupy the largest amount of space within the vacuum system 10, in the illustrated example, in the space between the booster pump 14 and the backing vacuum pump 16. The shape and configuration of the manifold 50 of the invention will, of course, need to be matched to particular pump configurations, but it will be appreciated that having a passive pressure-regulating manifold can be an advantage in many situations, compared with having a relatively complex and expensive, mechanical pressure-regulating valve 24.
(19)
(20) In
(21) Extending sideward, and in fluid communication with the interior of the conduit portion 76 of the main body portion 66 are a pair of hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80 that provide the aforementioned and described free volume 64 for in-rush gasses to be accumulated in. Thus, during a sudden in-rush event, the volume of in-rush gas is able to be accommodated within the hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80 to reduce the pressure build-up that would otherwise have occurred had the hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80 not been present.
(22) It will be noted, from
(23) The volume of the hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80 is maximised by shaping them, as shown, to occupy the maximum possible free space within the vacuum system 10. Conveniently, the invention also reduces or removes the need for a solid side arm 40 carrying a strut 44 because the structural connection flanges 46 previously described can be readily integrated into, or bolted onto the exterior of, the hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80, as shown in the drawings.
(24) The manifold 50 of the invention additionally comprises an auxiliary port 38, such as that previously described, but given the increased frontage of the end of the hollow expansion chamber portions 78, 80, it is possible to make the auxiliary port much larger, which can be advantageous in many situations.
(25) In the manifold shown in
(26) It will be apparent that there are practical upper and lower limits to the over-sizing of the manifold: the lower limit being over-sizing by a factor of approximately 2, whereby the volume of the expansion chamber portions 78, 80 will not provide a sufficiently-sized buffer for process gasses, and an upper limit dictated by the dimensions of the booster and backing pumps, or by the adverse effects of having too large a volume to pump down, of approximately 30. In practice, it will be desirable for the internal volume of the manifold to be as large as possible, given the physical constraints of the overall pump assembly, that is to say, the manifold will usually need to fit or nest in the available space between a booster pump and a backing pump.
(27) In most cases, the internal volume of the manifold will be over-sized by a factor ranging from between approximately 5 and 20, and most preferably by a factor ranging from between 5 and 15 or 5 and 10, with an over-sizing by a factor of substantially 7.5 being used in many practical situations.
(28) Another way to select the appropriate internal volume for the manifold is to consider the ratio of the booster and backing pump displacements. The greater the displacement of the booster in comparison with the backing pump, the larger the volume is required to be to accumulate the excess gas delivered by the booster. In addition, the greater the volume of gas to be evacuated from the process chamber, the larger the manifold volume needs to be. In practice it is found that the ratio of the free volume in the manifold (the combined volume of the conduit portion and the expansion chambers) to the largest anticipated process chamber volume should preferably be greater than 1% of the ratio of the booster displacement to backing pump displacement, and at least greater than 0.2% of ratio of displacements.
(29) The manifold described above and shown in
(30) Although the subject matter has been described in language specific to structural features and/or methodological acts, it is to be understood that the subject matter defined in the appended claims is not necessarily limited to the specific features or acts described above. Rather, the specific features and acts described above are described as example forms of implementing the claims.