Antimicrobial composite filtering material and method for making the same

Abstract

A filter media having lignite-derived activated carbon, polyacrylic acid (PAA), a commercially available copper-zinc alloy, and polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PolyDADMAC) or Luviquat, which is Poly[(3-methyl-1-vinylimidazolium chloride)-co-(1-vinylpyrrolidone)], combined and used as suitable replacement for TOG bituminous coal-based activated carbon, silver, and PolyDADMAC. Functional groups in lignite-based activated carbon interact with the polyacrylic acid. Functional groups such as calcium, iron, or aluminum oxide/hydroxide of lignite-based activated carbon interact with PAA, and help hold the PolyDADMAC in place. The additional presence of a copper-zinc alloy enhances the filter anti-microbiological performance.

Claims

1. A process for the production of a filter media for fluid filtration having antimicrobial properties comprising the steps of: a) diluting polyacrylic acid in deionized water to form a diluted solution; b) adding lignite-based powdered activated carbon to said diluted solution and blending to form a blended solution; c) soaking said blended solution; d) mixing a copper-zinc alloy with a wet cellulose fibrillated fiber, a heavy metal removal powder adsorbent, and a CoPET/PET polyester fiber, with said blended solution to form a resultant solution; e) blending said resultant solution; f) forming a paper slurry from said resultant solution; and g) drying said paper slurry to form said filter media.

2. The process of claim 1 wherein said polyacrylic acid is diluted in deionized water at an approximate ratio of 0.5 g-11 g polyacrylic acid to 1 L of deionized water.

3. The process of claim 1 wherein said lignite-based powdered activated carbon is added to said diluted solution at a ratio of approximately 0.5 g to 8 g lignite-based powdered activated carbon to about 1 L of diluted solution.

4. The process of claim 1 wherein said lignite-based powdered activated carbon is blended with said diluted solution for approximately 3 minutes.

5. The process of claim 1 wherein said copper-zinc alloy is added to said blended solution at a ratio of 0.5 to 2 g of said copper-zinc alloy per 1 square foot of fabricated filter paper.

6. The process of claim 1 wherein said wet cellulose fibrillated fiber is added to said combined solution at an approximate ratio of 14 g to 60 g wet cellulose fibrillated fiber per 1 square foot of fabricated filter paper.

7. The process of claim 1 including treating said wet cellulose fibrillated fiber with a first flocculating agent.

8. The process of claim 7 wherein said first flocculating agent is added to said wet cellulose fibrillated fiber.

9. The process of claim 7 including adding a second flocculating agent.

10. The process of claim 9 wherein said second flocculating agent is added in a ratio of approximately 0.4 g-20 g of said second flocculating agent per 1 square foot of fabricated filter paper.

11. The process of claim 1 wherein said heavy metal removal powder (HMRP) adsorbent is combined with said blended solution at an approximate ratio of 0.6 g HMRP per 1 square foot of fabricated filter paper.

12. The process of claim 1 including forming said paper slurry on spun-bound polyester, and dried at about 250 F. for about thirty (30) minutes.

13. The process of claim 1 wherein said CoPET/PET polyester fiber is added at a ratio of approximately 1 g of said CoPET/PET polyester fiber per 1 square foot of fabricated filter paper.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) The features of the invention believed to be novel and the elements characteristic of the invention are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The figures are for illustration purposes only and are not drawn to scale. The invention itself, however, both as to organization and method of operation, may best be understood by reference to the detailed description which follows taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:

(2) FIG. 1 depicts a table of the performance of the filter media papers made to the specifications of process of the preferred embodiment of the present invention for different test Solutions #1, 2, and 3;

(3) FIG. 2 depicts a table delineating the results of the pilot production run for samples produced from the process of an embodiment of the present invention;

(4) FIG. 3 depicts a graphical representation comparing the flow rate between the benchmark (A1A3) sample and the sample with Luviquat (LVH1042) in lieu of POLYDADMAC;

(5) FIG. 4 depicts the microbiological performance of the filter media when PAA is substituted with cellulose nanocrystals (CNC);

(6) FIG. 5 depicts the microbiological performance of the filter media when PAA is substituted with lignite carbon with nitric acid treated coconut carbon; and

(7) FIG. 6 depicts the microbiological performance of filter media having lignite carbon replaced with coconut-based, wood-based, and coal-based carbon, made with a paper weight of approximately 13 g.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)

(8) In describing the preferred embodiment of the present invention, reference will be made herein to FIGS. 1-6 of the drawings in which like numerals refer to like features of the invention.

(9) In the present invention, the synergy of lignite-derived activated carbon, polyacrylic acid (PAA), a commercially available copper-zinc alloy (such as KDF of KDF Fluid Treatment, Inc., of Three Rivers, Mich.), and polydiallyldimethylammonium chloride (PolyDADMAC) or a quaternized copolymer such as Luviquat of BASF SE, which is Poly[(3-methyl-1-vinylimidazolium chloride)-co-(1-vinylpyrrolidone)], may be used to replace the current combination of TOG bituminous coal-based activated carbon, silver, and PolyDADMAC. In this manner, the need for silver is eliminated from the filter media, but the microbiological interception is retained.

(10) A copper-zinc alloy process media is used in place of, or in conjunction with, granular activated carbon filters, carbon block, or inline filters. It can be used to replace silver-impregnated systems. This is preferred since silver is toxic and must be registered with the EPA as a toxic pesticide, whereas a copper-zinc alloy process media is not toxic, and need not be registered. Silver is also more expensive, so there remains a cost benefit for using copper-zinc alloy.

(11) The preferred embodiment of the present invention represents a new formulation for an antimicrobial filter paper media, which allows for thinner layers, and thus less media. This enhances flow rate while lowering the cost of the final article. This novel formulation is capable of reaching or exceeding the microbiological interception capabilities of previous prior art formulations.

(12) Essentially, a preferred embodiment of the present invention employs and utilizes the functional groups in lignite-based activated carbon to interact with the polyacrylic acid. Functional groups such as calcium, iron, or aluminum oxide/hydroxide of lignite-based activated carbon interact with PAA, and help hold the PolyDADMAC in place. Second, the carbon also has larger pores, e.g., more mesopore/macropores, and more acidic groups, e.g., carboxylic acidic groups, which will help to hold the PolyDADMAC.

(13) The additional presence of a copper-zinc alloy, such as for example KDF, has been found to enhance the filter anti-microbiological performance without having to employ silver as the antimicrobial material. The copper or zinc will also interact with the poly (1-vinylpyrrolidone) segments in Luviquat to further anchor the positively charged polymer.

(14) The preparation of filter paper that does not employ silver as the antimicrobial material is described below. Three different solutions from which filter paper was manufactured were generated and tested to determine the preferred embodiment of the present invention.

(15) In three of four solutions, polyacrylic acid is diluted in one (1) liter of deionized water. The PAA may be, for example, Acumer 1510 from Dow Chemical at 25% weight, or other equivalent. Each solution (Solutions #1, #2, & #3) contains a different amount of PAA diluted. Solution #0 has no PAA; Solution #1 has approximately 0.5 g of PAA diluted; Solution #2 has approximately 2.0 g of PAA diluted; and Solution #3 has approximately 11.0 g of PAA diluted.

(16) Next, approximately 8.1 g of lignite-based powdered activated carbon, such as Hydrodarco B from Cabot Corporation of Alpharetta, Ga., or other equivalent, is added to the above solutions and blended for about three (3) minutes. Hydrodarco B is a lignite-based powdered activated carbon produced by steam activation of lignite coal, preferably finely milled to obtain a high degree of suspension with a high capacity for adsorption of organics that would otherwise cause taste and odor problems in drinking water supplies. The three blended solutions are then soaked overnight.

(17) Next, a copper-zinc alloy is added. Preferably, approximately 2 g of a copper-zinc alloy, such as KDF-55F extra fine (325 mesh) from KDF Fluid Treatment, or equivalent, is added. The copper-zinc alloy acts in replacement of silver as the antimicrobial in the filter paper.

(18) Next, approximately 0.63 g of an adsorbent such as a heavy metal removal powder (HMRP) is added to each solution. A preferred HMRP is Metsorb HMRP of Graver Technologies, LLC, of Glasgow, Del. MetSorb HMRP adsorbent is a free-flowing powder designed for incorporation into pressed or extruded carbon blocks. The addition of MetSorb HMRP at relatively low levels to a carbon block design is very effective for the reduction of lead, and at higher HMRP usage levels effective for reduction of arsenic, to meet the requirements of NSF Standard 42. MetSorb HMRP adsorbs not only cationic lead species, but also both forms of Arsenic: Arsenic III and Arsenic V, present as (neutral) arsenite and (anionic) arsenate respectively. HMRP will also reduce a wide range of other metal contaminants commonly present in drinking water or process water, and is effective in polishing low levels of metal contaminants from industrial waste streams.

(19) The resultant solutions are then independently combined with the following: a) Approximately 13.86 g of a treated, wet cellulose fibrillated fiber (CSFO). The treatment is preferably with flocculating agents. Flocculants are used in water treatment to improve the sedimentation or filterability of small particles. One such flocculant is Floquat of S.N.F.S.A. of Saint-Etienne of France; b) Approximately 1.26 g of a low melting CoPET/PET polyester fiber, such as, for example, N720 fibers of Engineered Fibers Technology of Shelton, Conn., or equivalent; and c) Approximately 8.0 g, 8.0 g, 6.0 g, and 20.0 g to Solutions #0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, of a second flocculating agent, preferably Floquat FL4440 (40% weight) of S.N.F.S.A.

(20) Each resultant solution is then blended for three (3) minutes.

(21) A paper slurry of each solution is formed in a Deckle Box on spun-bound polyester, such as Reemay of Fiberweb, LLC, of Wilmington, Del., or equivalent, and dried at about 250 F. for about thirty (30) minutes to obtain approximately 1212 paper sheets.

(22) The resultant paper weight of each solution without the spun-bound polyester are on the order of about 10.92 g, 12.7 g, 14.6 g, and 18.0 g respectively.

(23) FIG. 1 depicts a table of the performance of the papers made to the specifications of Solutions #0, 1, 2, and 3 above, having different PAA amounts and different amounts of the second flocculating agent, in a gravity flow environment, against different pathogens (MS-2 bacteriophage and E. coli). The log removal values (LRV) of the pathogens were compared. The log removal value is the logarithm of the ratio of pathogen concentration in the influent and effluent water of a treatment process. (An LRV of 1 is equivalent to about a 90% removal of a target pathogen, an LRV of 2 is equivalent to about a 99% removal, and an LRV of 3 is equivalent to about 99.9% removal.) In FIG. 1, the four solutions are designated by the following labels: Solution #0 is named LGKDF0, Solution #1 is named LGKDF1, Solution #2 is named LGKDF2, and Solution #3 is named LGKDF3.

(24) To acquire the testing results depicted in FIG. 1, samples of two 35 patches were cut from each of the different paper sheets of filter media formed from the three solutions developed by the process described above. The 35 patches were then wrapped on a plastic cylindrical core of about three (3) inches in length, and properly glued using normal binding techniques known in the art to obtain three different two-layered filters. The cylindrical filters were then secured/sealed (preferably glued) onto openings at the bottom of 1 gallon capacity buckets. Each filter was challenged with a mixture of approximately 10.sup.6 cfu/ml (colony forming unit per milliliter) of E. coli and 10.sup.6 cfu/ml of MS-2 bacteriophage, in one gallon of dechlorinated city water.

(25) Gravity acted as the driving pressure in this test environment. The flow rates and pH of the influents and effluents were checked daily until the filter flow rate reduces to about zero, and the filters clogged. Samples from the influents and effluents were collected and cultured daily. The detailed antimicrobial experiments of E. coli and MS-2 reduction of each gravity filter were performed, and the results summarized in the table of FIG. 1. As noted in FIG. 1, the filters having increased PAA clogged earlier. For the LGKDF0 sample, the filter had some failure on bacteria reduction though it exhibited a higher flow rate. For the LGKDF1 filter, the performance exceeded that of the other two filter samples.

(26) The samples from Solutions #2 and 3 (LGKDF2 and LGKDF3) clogged sooner. The latter being unable to achieve sufficient flow at the onset. The log removal rate of LGKDF1 and LGKDF2 exceeded that of the LGKDF0 sample as shown for flow rates up to and including 9 mL/min. The log removal rate of LGKDF1 was on the order of LGKDF2 up to 9 mL/min; however, the added filtering material presented a lower flow rate for the filter media option.

(27) A pilot production run of filter media utilizing the same formulation process above was also conducted. Two samples were generated having a paper weight of about 9 g and 12 g. These samples were designated R276-9 and R276-12, respectively. These samples were compared against a benchmark (A1A3). The flow rates of both samples were significantly better than A1A3 and the log removal rates were better or at least comparable in all instances.

(28) The similar procedure is performed with the replacement of POLYDADMAC with Luviquat polymer of BASF Corporation of Florham Park, N.J., made with a paper weight of approximately 13 g, and identified as test sample LVH1042. The comparison of flow rate between the benchmark A1A3 and the sample with Luviquat (LVH1042) is depicted in FIG. 3. The Luviquat sample had significantly better flow rate.

(29) It is noted that the flow rate of the test samples may be increased by reducing the thickness of paper without any appreciable degradation in antimicrobial performance.

(30) FIG. 2 depicts a table delineating the results of the pilot production run for samples R276-9 and R276-12. R276-12 exhibited greater log removal values per current gallon influent; however, the flow rate was appreciably less than R276-9. That is, as one would expect, when the thickness of the paper is reduced, the flow rate increases. R276-9 achieved significant flow rate increases across the spectrum of current gallon influent over the prior art test sample A1A3 while maintaining or exceeding the prior art's log removal values for MS-2 and E. coli.

(31) A similar procedure is performed with the replacement of PAA with cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) obtained as an 11.6% solution, made with a paper weight of approximately 12 g, and identified as test sample KDFCNC57. CNC are whiskers with a length of several hundred nanometers and a diameter of several nanometers. Their surface area is about hundreds square meters per gram. Due to their production process and their nature, the CNC has lots of negatively charged functional groups, such as carboxylic acidic groups and sulfonic acidic groups on their surface. Therefore, they can be used to substitute the PAA. Its MB performance is depicted in FIG. 4. The paper worked up to 10 gallons challenge with an excellent flow rate.

(32) The similar procedure is performed with the replacement of lignite carbon with nitric acid treated coconut carbon, made with a paper weight of approximately 10 g, and identified as test sample KDF20. The microbiological performance is depicted in FIG. 5. The paper has a very high zeta potential, 23 mV at pH of 6.1.

(33) Different types of carbon have different pores, surface chemistry, etc. The similar procedure is performed with the replacement of lignite carbon with coconut-based, wood-based and coal-based carbon, made with a paper weight of approximately 13 g, and identified as test samples coconut-based, wood-based and coal-based carbon. The microbiological performance is depicted in FIG. 6. The R276-9 g was a pilot run of the lignite-based carbon. For all non-lignite carbon, only 4 log bacteria reduction was observed, while greater than 4 log virus reduction was observed for all the data points in FIG. 6.

(34) A filter cartridge having filter media formed from the above-identified process represents another embodiment of the present invention. The filter cartridge is generally fabricated for use in gravity-flow applications and includes an input or ingress port for receiving unfiltered fluid, and an output or egress port for exiting filtered fluid. The filter media is enclosed within a sump of the filter cartridge. The filter media within the filter cartridge may be pleated for increased surface area, which also minimizes the pressure drop across the filter media.

(35) While the present invention has been particularly described, in conjunction with a specific preferred embodiment, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the foregoing description. It is therefore contemplated that the appended claims will embrace any such alternatives, modifications and variations as falling within the true scope and spirit of the present invention.