White smoke mix
10539270 ยท 2020-01-21
Assignee
Inventors
Cpc classification
F17C2221/03
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F42B12/48
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F41H9/06
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
C06B33/02
CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
F42B12/48
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F17C5/00
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
Abstract
A mixture and method of creating the mixture includes mixing hexachloroethane, stannous oxide, and aluminum together. The mixture may be loaded into at least one canister. The mixture may be combusted to create a smoke screen. The loading of the mixture into the at least one canister may include pressurized loading at loading pressures in the range of approximately 2300 psi to 3600 psi. The hexachloroethane may include approximately 30-40 parts by weight of the mixture and have a particle size of approximately less than 850 m. The stannous oxide may include approximately 55-65 parts by weight of the mixture and have a particle size of approximately less than 150 m. The aluminum may include approximately 5-10 parts by weight of the mixture and have a particle size of approximately less than 45 m. The mixture is devoid of zinc chloride.
Claims
1. A method of generating white smoke, comprising: mixing hexachloroethane, stannous oxide, and aluminum together to create a mixture; loading said mixture into at least one canister; and combusting said mixture to produce a smoke screen, wherein said mixture reacts to produce stannous chloride (SnCl.sub.2) for smoke generation.
2. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said hexachloroethane comprises approximately 30-40 parts by weight of said mixture.
3. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said stannous oxide comprises approximately 55-65 parts by weight of said mixture.
4. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said aluminum comprises approximately 5-10 parts by weight of said mixture.
5. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said hexachloroethane comprises particles having a particle size of less than approximately 850 m.
6. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said stannous oxide comprises particles having a particle size of less than approximately 150 m.
7. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said aluminum comprises particles having a particle size of less than approximately 45 m.
8. The mixture of claim 1, wherein said mixture is devoid of zinc and does not produce zinc chloride.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein the loading of said mixture into said at least one canister comprises pressurized loading.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein said pressurized loading comprises loading pressures in the range of approximately 2300 psi to approximately 3600 psi.
11. The mixture of claim 2, wherein said hexachloroethane comprises approximately 34 parts by weight of said mixture.
12. The mixture of claim 3, wherein said stannous oxide comprises approximately 58 parts by weight of said mixture.
13. The mixture of claim 4, wherein said aluminum comprises approximately 8 parts by weight of said mixture.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
(1) The embodiments herein will be better understood from the following detailed description with reference to the drawings, in which:
(2)
(3)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(4) The embodiments herein and the various features and advantageous details thereof are explained more fully with reference to the non-limiting embodiments that are illustrated in the accompanying drawings and detailed in the following description. Descriptions of well-known components and processing techniques are omitted so as to not unnecessarily obscure the embodiments herein. The examples used herein are intended merely to facilitate an understanding of ways in which the embodiments herein may be practiced and to further enable those of skill in the art to practice the embodiments herein. Accordingly, the examples should not be construed as limiting the scope of the embodiments herein.
(5) The embodiments herein provide a pyrotechnic formulation to generate a smoke screen for obscuring effects and for ground-to-air signaling. The formulation provides screening effects but produces less toxic products than the conventional formulations. The screening product comprises stannous chloride, which has less toxic characteristics than the conventional formulations. Referring now to the drawings, and more particularly to
(6) The new smoke formulation provided by the embodiments herein achieves comparable screening coverage as the conventional zinc chloride containing formulation but with a more environmentally friendly and less toxic compound. The formulation of the reaction provided by the embodiments herein is a follows:
C.sub.2Cl.sub.6+3SnO+2Al.fwdarw.3SnCl.sub.2+Al.sub.2O.sub.3+2C
(7) This reaction produces a large volume of stannous chloride. While stannous chloride has deliquescent properties like that of zinc chloride, stannous chloride is much more environmentally friendly than zinc chloride and less toxic as well. The three components' parts by weight percentages and approximate particle sizes are shown in Table 1.
(8) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Smoke Formulation Parts Approximate Component by Weight Particle Size Hexachloroethane 30-40% Less than 850 m Stannous Oxide 55-65% Less than 150 m Aluminum 5-10% Less than 45 m
(9) As shown in
(10) The formulation provided by the embodiments herein is distinct from the conventional formulations by the removal of zinc chloride from the smoke products. Past toxicology tests have shown zinc chloride to have negative impacts on the environment and as well as having severe effects on inhalation studies. Conversely, stannous chloride has a much safer toxicology while still achieving the desired smoke screen effect.
(11)
(12) As mentioned, zinc chloride contains toxic and otherwise environmentally disadvantageous characteristics. Most attempts by the industry to replace zinc chloride with a safer alternative have involved using alkaline and alkali Earth metals due to their environmental friendly characteristics (e.g., these are found in salt water). Use of tin compounds has not been a practical solution to utilize due to their uncommon and unobvious use in pyrotechnic mixtures. The primary reason for this is the possibility of stannous chloride unintentionally being converted into stannic chloride, which is slightly more toxic. Indeed, due to the lack of previous or contemporary formulations, studies, and experiments involving tin components in pyrotechnics, use of stannous chloride has not been a potential choice by the industry in commercial or military pyrotechnic mixtures. Due to the lack of available data of tin as it relates to pyrotechnic reactions, the industry has never previously considered use of stannous chloride for pyrotechnics.
(13) The foregoing description of the specific embodiments will so fully reveal the general nature of the embodiments herein that others can, by applying current knowledge, readily modify and/or adapt for various applications such specific embodiments without departing from the generic concept, and, therefore, such adaptations and modifications should and are intended to be comprehended within the meaning and range of equivalents of the disclosed embodiments. It is to be understood that the phraseology or terminology employed herein is for the purpose of description and not of limitation. Therefore, while the embodiments herein have been described in terms of preferred embodiments, those skilled in the art will recognize that the embodiments herein can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.