Livestock footbath solutions and methods of use

Abstract

Embodiments of the present invention provide improved livestock foot bath solutions that are capable of maintaining a low pH during longer periods of use in order to help prevent the metal salts from precipitating out of the solution and rendering the solution ineffective. Embodiments of the present invention provide improved livestock foot bath solutions that include one or more weak organic acids, such as polyprotic organic acids, in the aqueous solution, along with the dissolved metal salts. Embodiments of the invention may also include sulfuric acid, or some other strong acid, together with citric acid and the dissolved metal salts in the aqueous solution.

Claims

1. A non-colloidal, low viscosity composition for use in a livestock foot bath which helps maintain the solubility of dissolved metal ions comprising an aqueous solution containing at least one of a copper salt or a zinc salt in an amount of about 10% wt/wt to about 25% wt/wt; a strong inorganic acid in an amount from about 2.5% wt/wt to about 4% wt/wt; and at least one organic polyprotic acid in an amount from about 3% wt/wt to about 10% wt/wt that is operable to inhibit copper and zinc ions from precipitating out of said composition when said composition is fouled by organic waste in said livestock foot bath.

2. The composition of claim 1 wherein said strong inorganic acid comprises sulfuric acid.

3. The composition of claim 2 wherein a dilution of said aqueous solution for use in a cattle foot bath comprises said strong inorganic acid in a concentration from about 0.125% wt/wt to about 0.2% wt/wt.

4. The composition of claim 1 wherein said copper salt is a copper sulfate compound.

5. The composition of claim 4 wherein said copper sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

6. The composition of claim 4 wherein said copper sulfate compound is provided in a concentration is in a range of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

7. The composition of claim 1 wherein said zinc salt is a zinc sulfate compound.

8. The composition of claim 7 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

9. The composition of claim 7 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

10. The composition of claim 1 wherein said at least one organic polyprotic acid is provided in a concentration of between about 4% and about 6% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

11. The composition of claim 1 wherein said at least one organic polyprotic acid comprises citric acid.

12. The composition of claim 11 wherein said at least one organic polyprotic acid is provided in a concentration of between about 4% and about 6% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

13. The composition of claim 11 wherein said citric acid is provided in a concentration of about 5% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

14. The composition of claim 11 wherein a dilution of said aqueous solution for use in a cattle foot bath comprises said at least one organic polyprotic acid in a concentration of between about 0.2% wt/wt and about 0.3% wt/wt.

15. The composition of claim 1 wherein said strong inorganic acid is provided in a concentration of about 2.5 to about 3.5% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

16. The composition of claim 15 wherein said at least one organic polyprotic acid comprises citric acid and is provided in a concentration of between about 4% and about 6% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

17. The composition of claim 1 wherein said strong inorganic acid is provided in a concentration of about 3.3% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

18. The composition of claim 1 wherein a dilution of said aqueous solution for use in a cattle foot bath comprises said at least one organic polyprotic acid in a concentration of between about 0.2% wt/wt and about 0.3% wt/wt.

19. A method for increasing the useful life of a livestock foot bath by inhibiting the precipitation of metal salts therein comprising the steps of: preparing a non-colloidal, low viscosity aqueous solution for said foot bath including at least one of a copper sulfate compound or a zinc sulfate compound in a concentration of about 10% wt/wt to about 25% wt/wt; a strong inorganic acid in an amount from about 2.5% wt/wt to about 4% wt/wt; and at least one polyprotic organic acid in an amount from about 3% wt/wt to about 10% wt/wt operable to inhibit copper and zinc ions from precipitating out of said composition when said composition is fouled by organic waste in said livestock foot bath.

20. The method of claim 19, wherein said strong inorganic acid comprises sulfuric acid.

21. The method of claim 20 wherein said at least one polyprotic organic acid is provided in a concentration of between about 4% and about 6% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

22. The method of claim 21, further comprising diluting the aqueous solution in water to yield a 5% diluted solution.

23. The method of claim 20 wherein said strong inorganic acid is sulfuric acid and is provided in a concentration of between about 2.5% and about 3.5% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

24. The method of claim 23 wherein said sulfuric acid is provided in a concentration of about 3% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

25. The method of claim 23 wherein said sulfuric acid is provided in a concentration of about 3.3% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

26. The method of claim 19 wherein said copper sulfate compound is selected from the group consisting of CuSO.sub.4, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O), CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.2, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.3, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.4, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.5, and combinations thereof.

27. The method of claim 19 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is selected from the group consisting of ZnSO.sub.4, ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O), ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.6, ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.7, and combinations thereof.

28. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one polyprotic organic acid comprises citric acid.

29. The method of claim 28 wherein said at least one polyprotic acid is provided in a concentration of about 5% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

30. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one polyprotic acid is provided in a concentration of about 5% wt/wt in said aqueous solution.

31. The method of claim 19, further comprising adding said 5% diluted solution in a livestock foot bath.

32. The method of claim 19 wherein said copper sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

33. The method of claim 19 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

34. The method of claim 19 wherein said copper sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

35. The method of claim 19 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

36. A non-colloidal, low viscosity aqueous composition for use in a livestock foot bath which helps maintain the solubility of dissolved metal ions consisting essentially of at least one of copper sulfate or zinc sulfate in a concentration in a range of about 10% wt/wt to about 25% wt/wt, a strong acid in an amount in a range of about 2.0% wt/wt to about 4.0% wt/wt, and citric acid in an amount in a range of about 4.0% wt/wt to about 6.0% wt/wt operable to inhibit copper and zinc ions from precipitating out of said composition when said composition is fouled by organic waste in said livestock foot bath.

37. The composition of claim 36 wherein said copper sulfate is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

38. The composition of claim 36 wherein said zinc sulfate is provided in a concentration of between about 5% wt/wt and about 15% wt/wt.

39. The composition of claim 36 wherein said copper sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

40. The composition of claim 36 wherein said zinc sulfate compound is provided in a concentration of about 5% to about 10% wt/wt.

41. A non-colloidal, low viscosity composition for use in a livestock foot bath which helps maintain the solubility of dissolved metal ions comprising an aqueous solution including at least one of a copper salt or a zinc salt; a strong inorganic acid; and at least one organic polyprotic acid in a concentration operable to inhibit copper and zinc ions from precipitating out of said composition when said composition is fouled by organic waste in said livestock foot bath, wherein the weight ratio of the at least one of a copper salt or a zinc salt to the strong inorganic acid is in a range of about 5:2 to about 10:1.

42. The composition of claim 41 wherein said strong inorganic acid comprises sulfuric acid.

43. The composition of claim 41 wherein said copper salt is a copper sulfate compound.

44. The composition of claim 41 wherein said zinc salt is a zinc sulfate compound.

45. The composition of claim 41 wherein the weight ratio of the at least one of a copper salt or a zinc salt to the at least one organic polyprotic acid is in a range of about 1:1 to about 8:1.

46. The composition of claim 41 wherein the weight ratio of the strong inorganic acid to the at least one organic polyprotic acid is in a range of about 4:3 to about 1:10.

47. The composition of claim 41 wherein the weight ratio of the strong inorganic acid to the at least one organic polyprotic acid is in a range of about 1:1 to about 1:3.

48. The composition of claim 41 wherein said at least one organic polyprotic acid comprises citric acid.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (100) for a copper mixture.

(2) FIG. 2 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (101) for a copper and citric acid mixture.

(3) FIG. 3 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (102) for a zinc mixture.

(4) FIG. 4 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (103) for a zinc and citric acid mixture.

(5) FIG. 5 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (104) for copper and zinc mixture.

(6) FIG. 6 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (105) for copper, zinc and citric acid mixture.

(7) FIG. 7 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 1-6.

(8) FIG. 8 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (109) for a copper and citric acid mixture.

(9) FIG. 9 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (110) for a copper and sulfuric acid mixture.

(10) FIG. 10 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (111) for a copper, citric acid and sulfuric acid mixture.

(11) FIG. 11 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (112) for a copper and sulfuric acid mixture.

(12) FIG. 12 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (113) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(13) FIG. 13 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (114) for a citric acid and copper mixture.

(14) FIG. 14 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (115) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(15) FIG. 15 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (116) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(16) FIG. 16 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (117) for a sulfuric acid mixture and copper.

(17) FIG. 17 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (118) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(18) FIG. 18 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (119) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(19) FIG. 19 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (120) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and copper mixture.

(20) FIG. 20 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (121) for a sulfuric acid, and zinc mixture.

(21) FIG. 21 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (122) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and zinc mixture.

(22) FIG. 22 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (123) for a citric acid, and zinc mixture.

(23) FIG. 23 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (124) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and zinc mixture.

(24) FIG. 24 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (125) for a sulfuric acid, citric acid and zinc mixture.

(25) FIG. 25 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (126) for a copper mixture.

(26) FIG. 26 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (127) for a zinc mixture.

(27) FIG. 27 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (128) for a sulfuric acid, sodium and copper mixture.

(28) FIG. 28 is a graph of an exemplary pH titration curve (129) for a sulfuric acid and sodium mixture.

(29) FIG. 29 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 11-13.

(30) FIG. 30 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 12, 14 and 15.

(31) FIG. 31 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 12 and 16-19.

(32) FIG. 32 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 20-24.

(33) FIG. 33 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 11 and 25-26.

(34) FIG. 34 is a combination graph showing each of the titration curves of FIGS. 11, 12, 27 and 28.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(35) Referring to the drawings and to the examples and tables below, it is to be understood that the titration of the acids in dairy foot bath compositions with ammonium hydroxide simulates the neutralizing effect of alkaline compounds in the animal waste deposited in actual foot bath water. The total amount of ammonium hydroxide needed to bring a sample of a composition to pH above 5.0 is an accurate indication of its effectiveness in maintaining the bath pH a low level.

(36) The compositions of the present invention may include a concentrated aqueous solution of one or more zinc or copper compounds (e.g., copper sulfate or salt thereof, zinc sulfate or salt thereof), one or more strong inorganic acids (e.g., H.sub.2SO.sub.4, HCl, H.sub.2NO.sub.3, or H.sub.3PO.sub.4), and one or more weak organic acids or salts thereof. The one or more copper or zinc compounds may be present in the aqueous solution in a range of about 10% to about 25% (w/w) (e.g., about 15% to about 20% [w/w]). The one or more weak organic acids may be present in the aqueous solution in a range of about 3% (w/w) to about 10% (w/w) (e.g., about 4% [w/w] to about 6% [w/w] or any value therein). The one or more strong inorganic acids may be present in the aqueous solution in a range of about 1% (w/w) to about 4% (w/w) (e.g., about 2.5% [w/w] to about 3.5% [w/w] or any value therein). For example, the strong inorganic acid may be sulfuric acid in a concentration of between about 2.5% and about 3.5% wt/wt in the concentrate solution. The copper or zinc compound may be CuSO.sub.4, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O), CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.2, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.3, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.4, CuSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.5, ZnSO.sub.4, ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O), ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.6, ZnSO.sub.4(H.sub.2O).sub.7, and combinations thereof.

(37) The one or more weak organic acids may include citric acid, succinic acid, 2,3 dihydroxylated succinic acid, glutaric acid, hexanedioic acid, heptanedioic acid, octanedioic acid, nonanedioic acid, decanedioic acid, malic acid, fumaric acid, aconitic acid, Isocitric acid, Propane-1,2,3-tricarboxylic acid, benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, benzene-1,3,5-tricarboxylic acid, salts of such organic acids, and combinations thereof.

(38) The final foot bath solution may be prepared by combining the concentrate solution with water in a ratio in a range of 1:1 to 1:30 (concentrate:water) prior to being placed in a livestock footbath. For example, the concentrate solution may be diluted in water to a 5% diluted solution. 5% diluted solution may then be added to a livestock footbath for cleaning hooves or feet. The final footbath solution may be agitated to disperse the concentrate solution into diluted mixture. The final footbath solution may be agitated by a Venturi tube such that the agitation may occur efficiently within a conduit system for delivering the final footbath solution into the livestock footbath. Other methods of agitation are also within the scope of the present invention, such as mixing the solution manually or with a motorized stirring rod in a bath prior to addition to the livestock footbath.

(39) After the dilution step, the diluted footbath solution of the present invention may include one or more copper or zinc compounds in a range of about 0.5% to about 1.25% (w/w) (e.g., about 0.75% to about 1% [w/w]). The one or more weak organic acids may be present in the diluted footbath solution in a range of about 0.15% (w/w) to about 0.5% (w/w) (e.g., about 0.2% [w/w] to about 0.3% [w/w] or any value therein). The one or more strong inorganic acids may be present in the aqueous solution in a range of about 0.05% (w/w) to about 0.2% (w/w) (e.g., about 0.125% [w/w] to about 0.175% [w/w] or any value therein). For example, the strong inorganic acid may be sulfuric acid in a concentration of between about 0.125% and about 0.175% wt/wt in the concentrate solution. The final foot bath solution may provide a solution that maintains pH at or below 4.5 after being used to wash and treat up to about 500 cattle or other livestock.

(40) The following examples and tables display titration curves which will show the effectiveness of embodiments of the present invention resulting from laboratory experiments. All chemicals were titrated at concentrations found in foot baths. In each example, the compositions were diluted to 5% w/w in 400 gm of water. The neutralizing capacity of each solution was determined by titrating with a 1.25% ammonium hydroxide solution, which simulates the alkali waste produced by livestock. The endpoint for the titration was determined to be the pH at which a stable precipitate of metals formed, i.e. approaching or reaching 5.0. The total number of millimeters of ammonium hydroxide to reach that pH value is given as the titer in millimeters.

Example 1A

(41) This exemplary example (Test Sample 100) used a solution of copper sulfate pentahydrate, sulfuric acid and water without any citric acid or other weak organic acid. In contrast, example 1B below used the same components plus citric acid. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 100 gm of CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 15 gm of H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and 385 gm of H.sub.2O. A 5% w/w solution, which is similar to a dairy foot bath concentration, was prepared by mixing 20 gm of the composition with 380 gm H.sub.2O and then titrating it with doses of 2 ml ammonium hydroxide 1.25% solution to the end point shown in Table 1 below.

Example 1B

(42) This exemplary example (Test Sample 101) used a solution of copper sulfate pentahydrate, sulfuric acid, citric acid and water. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 100 gm. CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm citric acid and 360 gm H.sub.2O. A 5% w/w solution, which is similar to a dairy foot bath concentration, was prepared by mixing 20 gm of the composition with 380 gm H.sub.2O and titrating to the end point shown in Table 1 below.

(43) As shown in Table 1 below, it can be seen that the solution of example 1A reached a pH of 5 after only 20 ml of ammonium hydroxide solution, whereas the solution of example 1B (which also contained citric acid) did not reach pH 5 until 64 ml of ammonium hydroxide was added.

(44) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 TEST SAMPLE ENDPOINT TITER Test Sample 100 pH 5.1 20 ml. Test Sample 101 pH 5.2 64 ml.

Example 2A

(45) This exemplary example (Test Sample 102) used a solution of zinc sulfate monohydrate, sulfuric acid and water without any citric acid or other weak organic acid. In contrast, example 2B below used the same components plus citric acid. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 100 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4 and 385 gm H.sub.2O were mixed. A 5% w/w solution, which is similar to dairy foot bath concentration, was prepared by mixing 20 gm of the composition with 380 gm H.sub.2O and then titrating it to the endpoint specified in Table 2 below.

Example 2B

(46) This exemplary example (Test Sample 103) used a solution of zinc sulfate monohydrate, sulfuric acid, citric acid and water. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 100 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm citric acid and 360 gm water were mixed. A 5% w/w solution, similar to the concentration in dairy foot baths, was prepared and titrated to the endpoint shown in Table 2 below.

(47) As shown in Table 2 below, it can be seen that the solution of example 2A reached a pH of 5 after only 18 ml of ammonium hydroxide solution, whereas the solution of example 2B (which also contained citric acid) did not reach pH 5 until over 46 ml of ammonium hydroxide was added.

(48) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 TEST SAMPLE ENDPOINT TITER Test Sample 102 pH 5.1 18 ml. Test Sample 103  pH 4.96 46 ml.

Example 3A

(49) This exemplary example (Test Sample 104) used a solution of copper sulfate pentahydrate, zinc sulfate monohydrate, sulfuric acid and water without any citric acid or other weak organic acid. In contrast, example 3B below used the same components plus citric acid. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, and 385 gm H.sub.2O. A 5% w/w solution, a similar concentration in foot baths, and titrated to the endpoint specified in Table 3 below.

Example 3B

(50) This exemplary example (Test Sample 105) used a solution of copper sulfate pentahydrate, zinc sulfate monohydrate, sulfuric acid, citric acid and water. In particular, this example solution contained a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm Citric Acid, and 360 gm H.sub.2O. A 5% w/w solution, a similar concentration in foot baths, and titrated to the endpoint specified in Table 3 below.

(51) As shown in Table 3 below, it can be seen that the solution of example 3A reached a pH of 5 after only 20 ml of ammonium hydroxide solution, whereas the solution of example 3B (which also contained citric acid) did not reach pH 5 until over 54 ml of ammonium hydroxide was added.

(52) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 TEST SAMPLE ENDPOINT TITER Test Sample 104 pH 5.25 20 ml. Test Sample 105 pH 4.56 54 ml.

(53) Set forth below in FIG. 7 is a combination of the graphs shown in FIGS. 1-6 (Test Samples 100-105) for comparison purposes, showing that the addition of citric acid to the compositions delays the increase in pH of the solution.

(54) Compositions of the present invention were also used in separate experiments at commercial dairy operations.

(55) Dairy Footbath Experiment 1:

(56) In this exemplary experiment, a dairy foot bath having a volume of approximately 270 gallons was used. The composition added to the footbath had the same ingredients and the same ratios as example 3B (i.e., a composition comprising a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm Citric Acid, and 360 gm H.sub.2O). A sufficient quantity of this composition was added to the water in the 270 gallon foot bath to create a 5% solution. The pH was then measured at 1.8. Thereafter, the foot bath was placed into use, and approximately 570 cows passed through it. The pH was then measured again, this time at 2.2. This was far below the level where the metal salts would otherwise precipitate from the solution. See Table 4 below.

(57) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 270 Gal. Foot Bath: CuSO.sub.4/ZnSO.sub.4 + Sulfuric acid + Citric acid pH of Foot Bath Start End 1.8 2.2
Dairy Footbath Experiment 2:

(58) In this exemplary experiment, the dairy had two footbaths, each having a capacity of approximately 70 gallons. In the first (south) footbath, a composition comprising the same ingredients and ratios of example 3A without citric acid (i.e., a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, and 385 gm H.sub.2O) was added to the water in this footbath to create a 5% solution. In the second (north) footbath, a composition comprising the same ingredients and ratios of example 3B including citric acid (i.e., a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm Citric Acid, and 360 gm H.sub.2O) was added to the water in this footbath to create a 5% solution.

(59) The pH of both foot baths was initially measured at 1.78 for the first foot bath, and 1.72 for the second foot bath. Thereafter, both foot baths were placed into use and approximately 500 cows passed through each of them. The pH was then measured again at 4.95 for the first foot bath, and 4.29 for the second foot bath. The beginning and ending pH values are shown in Table 5 below. It can be seen that the second foot bath that included citric acid had higher resistance to increases in pH than the first foot bath which had no citric acid in its solution.

(60) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 5 Foot Bath 1: Foot Bath 2: CuSO.sub.4/ZnSO.sub.4 + CuSO.sub.4/ZnSO.sub.4, sulfuric acid 3% sulfuric acid + 5% citric acid added pH of Bath pH of Bath Start End Start End 1.78 4.95 1.72 4.29

(61) At the same dairy as Dairy Footbath Experiment 2 above, data was collected over of several months from a footbath having a composition comprising the same ingredients and ratios of example 3B including citric acid (i.e., a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm Citric Acid, and 360 gm H.sub.2O) added to the water in the footbath to create a 5% solution. Samples were taken at three different times: (a) at the beginning of use (fresh footbath), (b) at a midpoint, when approximately half of the cows expected to use the footbath had gone through it, and (c) at an endpoint, just prior to replacement of the footbath solution. The averages and standard deviations for these data are set forth in table 5A below.

(62) TABLE-US-00006 TABLE 5A BEGINNING MIDPOINT ENDPOINT Average pH 2.09 2.03 2.15 Standard Deviation ±0.23 ±0.25 ±0.26
Dairy Footbath Experiment 3:

(63) In this exemplary experiment, the same two 70 gallon foot baths were used. In the first (south) foot bath, a solution having the same composition as in dairy experiment 2 above (i.e., a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 15 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, and 385 gm H.sub.2O) was added to the water in this footbath to create a 5% solution. However, in the second (north) footbath, a mixture having the same composition as in dairy experiment 2 above, including citric acid, was used except that the concentration of sulfuric acid was 3.3% instead of 3% (i.e., a mixture of 50 gm CuSO.sub.4.5H.sub.2O, 50 gm ZnSO.sub.4.H.sub.2O, 16.5 gm H.sub.2SO.sub.4, 25 gm Citric Acid, and 358.5 gm H.sub.2O). This mixture was added to the second foot bath to create a 5% solution.

(64) The pH of both foot baths was measured at 1.70 for the first foot bath, and 1.6 for the second foot bath. Thereafter, both foot baths were placed into use and approximately 500 cows passed through each of them. The pH was then measured again at 5.0 for the first foot bath, and 3.64 for the second foot bath as shown in Table 6 below. It can be seen that the second foot bath that included citric acid with a higher concentration of sulfuric acid had even higher resistance to increases in pH.

(65) TABLE-US-00007 TABLE 6 Foot Bath 1: Foot Bath 2: CuSO.sub.4/ZnSO.sub.4 + CuSO.sub.4/ZnSO.sub.4, sulfuric acid 3.3% sulfuric acid + 5% citric acid added pH of Bath pH of Bath Start End Start End 1.70 5.0 1.6 3.64
Other Experiments

(66) Set forth in FIGS. 8-34 (Test Samples 109-129 and comparison charts) are the results of other laboratory experiments which could be adapted for use in bovine foot baths showing the effectiveness of the inclusion of quantities of citric acid alone and with sulfuric acid to slow the rise of pH as ammonium hydroxide is added, simulating the neutralizing effect of alkaline compounds in the animal waste deposited in actual foot bath water. Each graph shows the initial ingredients and pH of the composition, and a titration graph showing the increase in pH as doses of 2 ml ammonium hydroxide 1.25% solution are added.

(67) It is to be appreciated that the data shown in Test Sample 111, for example, illustrates the fundamental benefits provided by the compositions of the present invention.

(68) It is to be appreciated that different versions of the invention may be made from different combinations of the various features described above. It is to be understood that other variations and modifications of the present invention may be made without departing from the scope thereof. It is also to be understood that the present invention is not to be limited by the specific embodiments or examples disclosed herein, but only in accordance with the appended claims when read in light of the foregoing specification.