LAYERED DOUBLE HYDROXIDE PRECURSOR, THEIR PREPARATION PROCESS AND CATALYSTS PREPARED THEREFROM

Abstract

New layered double hydroxide materials useful as intermediates in the formation of catalysts are described, as well as methods of preparing the layered double hydroxides. Also described are catalysts suitable for catalysing the hydrogenation of CO.sub.2 to methanol, as well as methods for preparing the catalysts. The LDH-derived catalysts of the invention are active in the hydrogenation of CO.sub.2 to methanol, and show improved activity with respect to Cu/ZnO catalysts derived from copper-zinc hydroxycarbonate precursors.

Claims

1. A layered double hydroxide of formula (I) shown below
[M.sub.1-xM.sub.x(OH).sub.2].sup.a+(X.sup.n).sub.a/nbH.sub.2O.Math.c(solvent) (I) wherein M represents a mixture of divalent cations comprising Cu.sup.2+ and Zn.sup.2+; M represents at least one trivalent cation; 0<x0.4; 0<b10; 0<c10; X represents at least one anion; n is the charge on anion X and has a value of 1 or 2; 0.2a0.4; and the solvent represents at least one organic solvent capable of hydrogen-bonding to water.

2. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein 0.05x0.35 or 0.08x0.35.

3-5. (canceled)

6. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein M represents at least one trivalent cation selected from Al.sup.3+, Ga.sup.3+, y.sup.3+, In.sup.3+, Fe.sup.3+, Co.sup.3+, Ni.sup.3+, Mn.sup.3+, Cr.sup.3+, Ti.sup.3, V.sup.3+ and La.sup.3+.

7-8. (canceled)

9. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein M is Ga.sup.3+.

10. The layered double hydroxide of claim 9, wherein M represents a mixture of divalent cations comprising Cu.sup.2 and Zn.sup.2+, as well as one or more other divalent cations selected from Mg.sup.2+, Fe.sup.2+, Ca.sup.2+, Sn.sup.2+, Ni.sup.2+, Co.sup.2+, MN.sup.2+ and Cd.sup.2+.

11. The layered double hydroxide of claim 9, wherein M represents a mixture of divalent cations consisting of Cu.sup.2+ and Zn.sup.2.

12. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein the mole ratio of Cu.sup.2+ to Zn.sup.2+ ranges from 1:0.2 to 1:2 or from 1:0.5 to 1:0.9.

13-15. (canceled)

16. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein M is a mixture of divalent cations consisting of Cu.sup.2+ and Zn.sup.2+ and the molar ratio of Cu:Zn:M is 1:(0.30-1.30):(0.05-0.80).

17. (canceled)

18. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein X represents at least one anion selected from a halide, an inorganic oxyanion, and an organic anion.

19. (canceled)

20. The layered double hydroxide of claim 11, wherein X is carbonate.

21. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein the solvent is selected from at least one of acetone, acetonitrile, dimethylformamide, dimethyl sulphoxide, dioxane, ethanol, methanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, n-butanol, sec-butanol, n-pentanol, n-hexanol, cyclohexanol, diethyl ether, diisopropyl ether, di-n-butyl ether, methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE), tert-amyl methyl ether, cyclopentyl methyl ether, cyclohexanone, methyl ethyl ketone (MEK), methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK), methyl isoamyl ketone, methyl n-amyl ketone, furfural, methyl formate, methyl acetate, isopropyl acetate, n-propyl acetate, isobutyl acetate, n-butyl acetate, n-amyl acetate, n-hexyl acetate, methyl amyl acetate, methoxypropyl acetate, 2-ethoxyethyl acetate and nitromethane.

22. The layered double hydroxide claim 20, wherein the solvent is selected from at least one of acetone, acetonitrile and ethanol.

23. The layered double hydroxide of claim 1, wherein M is Cu.sup.2+ and Zn.sup.2+ and M is Ga.sup.3, and wherein the molar ratio of Cu:Zn:Ga is 1:(0.62-0.72):(0.40-0.50).

24-34. (canceled)

35. A thermally-treated layered double hydroxide, comprising a thermally-treated form of the layered double hydroxide of claim 1.

36. The thermally-treated layered double hydroxide of claim 35, wherein the thermally-treated layered double hydroxide comprises a calcined form of the layered double hydroxide of claim 1.

37-50. (canceled)

51. A process for the preparation of methanol by hydrogenation of carbon dioxide and/or carbon monoxide, the process comprising the step of: a. providing a thermally-treated layered double hydroxide as claimed in any of claims 35 and 36; b. reducing the thermally-treated layered double hydroxide provided in step a) to yield a catalyst and c. contacting the catalyst obtained in step b) with a mixture of hydrogen and one or both of carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide.

52. The process of claim 51, wherein step c) comprises contacting the catalyst with a mixture of carbon dioxide and hydrogen.

53. The process of claim 51, wherein step c) is conducted at a temperature of 200-350 C.

54. The catalyst of claim 51, wherein the catalyst comprises Cu, Zn and Ga in a weight ratio of 1:(0.45-1.20):(0.10-0.70), or wherein the catalyst has a specific surface area of Cu (S.sub.Cu) determined by N.sub.2O chemisorption of 48-200 m.sup.2g.sup.1.

55. The catalyst of claim 51, wherein the catalyst has a Cu dispersion of >20%, or wherein the catalyst has a Cu loading of 30-40% by weight relative to the total weight of the catalyst.

Description

EXAMPLES

[0133] Examples of the invention will now be described, for illustrative purposes only, with reference to the accompanying figures, in which:

[0134] FIG. 1 shows the procedure for the synthesis of LDH samples via base solution.

[0135] FIG. 2 shows the procedure for the synthesis of CZG samples using co-precipitation.

[0136] FIG. 3 shows XRD profiles of (a) freshly prepared CZG catalyst; (b) calcined CZG catalyst at 330 C.; (c) freshly prepared LDH pre-catalyst; (d) calcined LDH pre-catalyst at 330 C.

[0137] FIG. 4a shows SXRD of freshly prepared LDH30Ga by synchrotron XRD (Diamond I11). A best fit model indicates monodispersed spheres with average diameter of 9.48 nm (average 4 layers): Pawley refinement with the best fitting parameters of r-wp 8.1142; r-exp 6.2624; r-p 6.3235; gof 1.2957. FIG. 4b shows SXRD of freshly prepared LDH40Ga by synchrotron XRD (Diamond I11). Pawley refinement with the best fitting parameters of R.sub.wP7.9297; R.sub.exp 5.7502; R.sub.P 6.1762; gof 1.3790. I=27.8994. Monodispersed spheres diameter=4I3=37.16 nm (46 layers). FIG. 4c shows TEM images of freshly prepared CZG samples: CZG0Ga (bulk form), CZG5Ga (fibrous-like) and CZG40Ga (small particles). FIG. 4d shows TEM images of freshly prepared AMO-LDH samples: LDH30Ga (monolayers), LDH30Ga-ww and LDH40Ga (thick layers). FIG. 4e shows thermogravimetric analysis result of the LDH30Ga sample. T1 and T2: temperature regions at which decomposition of OH and CO.sub.3.sup.2 groups takes place respectively. TGA was performed using a SDT Q600 thermal analyzer. Measurements were performed in the temperature range of 20-800 C. under continuous flow of compressed air (100 mL.Math.min.sup.1).

[0138] FIG. 5 shows TEM images of -freshly-prepared (a) CZG5Ga; (b) CZG40Ga; (c) LDH5Ga and (d) LDH30Ga.

[0139] FIG. 5e shows AFM image of single layer and few layers freshly prepared LDH30Ga sample on Si substrate. FIG. 5f shows the height profile of FIG. 5e.

[0140] FIG. 5g shows the LDH30Ga structural model showing 3 cationic layers with intercalated carbonate anions and water molecules in between. Each cationic layer contains Cu.sup.2+ (blue), Zn.sup.2+ (grey) and Ga.sup.3+ (orange) with OH.sup. vertexes in face sharing octahedra with an inter-layer separation of 7.8 in a rhombohedral (3R symmetry) [(CuZn).sub.1xGa.sub.x(OH).sub.2](CO.sub.3).sub.x/2 LDH structure derived from synchrotron XRD data (FIG. 4a). For simplicity, equal population of Cu, Zn and Ga ions are presented in this model and Jahn-Teller distortion of Cu.sup.2+ in octahedral sites is also not shown.

[0141] FIG. 6 shows TEM images, upper rows (a) calcined mixture CZG5Ga; Lower rows (b) reduced CZG5Ga containing 5-10 nm Cu/Zn rich particles with some of much larger sizes. FIG. 6c shows the size distribution diagrams of the nanoparticles in the reduced samples.

[0142] FIG. 7 shows TEM images, upper rows (a) calcined sheet-like LDH30Ga sample; Lower rows (b) reduced LDH30Ga containing many homogeneous small Cu/Zn rich particles of <5 nm. FIG. 7c shows the size distribution diagrams of the nanoparticles in the reduced samples.

[0143] FIG. 8 shows temperature programmed reduction (TPR) profile of (a) CZG samples (b) LDH samples

[0144] FIG. 9 shows XPS spectra of reduced LDH samples of (a) Ga 2p peaks; (b) Cu 2p peaks; (c) Zn 2 p.sub.3/2 peaks at various Ga concentrations.

[0145] FIG. 10 shows the conversion, selectivity and yield for each CZG samples in CO.sub.2 hydrogenation to methanol.

[0146] FIG. 11 shows the conversion, selectivity and yield for each LDH samples in CO.sub.2 hydrogenation to methanol.

[0147] FIG. 12 shows Zn/Cu ratios in CZG samples, as well as Zn/Cu ratio for LDH samples and the impact it has on CO.sub.2 hydrogenation.

[0148] FIG. 13 shows a comparison of conversion, selectivity and yield for LDH30Ga with and without acetone treatment for CO.sub.2 hydrogenation to methanol.

[0149] FIG. 14 shows a comparison of conversion, selectivity and yield of CZG5Ga, LDH30Ga, LDH30Ga-ww (water wash) and an industrial sample, HiFUEL with comparable Cu loadings for the CO.sub.2 hydrogenation to methanol at 270 C.

[0150] FIG. 15 correlates catalytic performance with Cu surface area for CZG and LDH samples.

Example 1

Preparation of Catalysts and Catalytic Intermediates

[0151] Using the protocols described below at 1.1 and 1.2, a variety of LDH catalytic precursors (exemplary compounds) and Cu/ZnO or Ga-modified Cu/ZnO catalysts (comparator compounds, termed CZ and CZG) were prepared, as outlined in Table 1 below:

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Synthesis recipes and determined compositions for CZG and LDH samples Synthesis recipe Cu:Zn:Ga Cu:Zn:Ga from ICP Catalysts (mol %) Cu:Zn:Ga (wt %) Cu:Zn:Ga (mol %) CZ 40:60:0 45:55:0 44:55:0 CZG-5Ga 40:55:5 43:51:6 44:51:5 CZG-10Ga 40:50:10 44:46:10 45:45:10 CZG-30Ga 40:30:30 44:26:30 45:26:29 CZG-40Ga 40:20:40 42:17:41 43:18:39 LDH-10Ga 40:50:10 43:50:7 44:49:7 LDH-20Ga 40:40:20 44:41:15 45:41:14 LDH-30Ga 40:30:30 45:32:23 47:32:21 LDH-40Ga 40:20:40 47:22:31 49:22:29 LDH-30Ga- 40:30:30 45:31:24 46:31:23 water wash Elemental chemical analysis was performed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), NexION 300, PerkinElmer.

1.1Synthesis of AMO-LDH Pre-Catalysts via Base Solution

[0152] A metal precursor solution was added drop-wise into a base solution under rapid stirring. During this nucleation step, the pH value was constantly controlled by adding drop-wise a NaOH solution. Nitrogen aging for 16 hours, the precipitate was washed with DI water until the pH was close to 7. Then, the obtained wet cake solid was dispersed into acetone liquid followed by stirring for 1-2 hours. At the end of this dispersion step, the resultant solid was filtered and washed thoroughly with acetone. The final product was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at room temperature. The LDHs were labelled LDH-xGa, wherein x indicates the mole % of Ga (see Table 1). As described in the literature, the powder sample with and without acetone AMO treatment showed a large difference in their surface area per gram basis.sup.21. Typically, the LDH-30Ga-water wash (no acetone treatment) and the same powder with acetone treatment (LDH-30Ga) gave 36.5 m.sup.2g.sup.1 and 158.7 m.sup.2g.sup.1, respectively. The procedure for the synthesis is graphically summarized in FIG. 1.

1.2Synthesis of CZG Catalysts by Co-Precipitation (Comparator Catalyst)

[0153] Ga.sup.3+ modified Cu/ZnO catalysts were synthesized using a pH-controlled co-precipitation method.sup.22. The metal precursors were hydrated metal nitrate salts: Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.3H.sub.2O (Aldrich), Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2.6H.sub.2O (Aldrich), and Ga(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9H.sub.2O (Aldrich). For a typical preparation the metal nitrates [3.77 g Cu(NO.sub.3).sub.2.3H.sub.2O; 5.53 g Zn(NO.sub.3).sub.2.6H.sub.2O; 0.75 g Ga(NO.sub.3).sub.3.9H.sub.2O] were dissolved completely in 100 mL deionized water. A Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 aqueous solution was prepared by dissolving 3.50 g of Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 in 100 mL of DI water. The solutions were added simultaneously into a plastic reactor containing 250 mL of preheated DI water. A delivery pump with two 50 mL syringes was used to inject the precursor metal nitrate solution at a constant rate of 0.42 mL/min in an automatic and reproducible manner. An HPLC pump was used to deliver the Na.sub.2CO.sub.3 solution at a rate of 0.35-0.70 mL/min. The mixture was stirred at 1000 rpm, with pH of the precipitating solution carefully maintained at 6.5. The precipitation process took place at around 80 C. The pH of the liquid was measured using a temperature-dependent pH meter and was controlled at pH 6.5, with an error range of 0.1. After aging for 16 h, the precipitate was extracted by centrifugation at 5000 rpm. The centrifuged precipitate was washed with DI water five times at 5000 rpm to remove residual Na.sup.+ ions. The resulting wet solid was dried in air at 80 C. overnight and then calcined in static air, at a ramp of 5 C/min up to 330 C. for 3 h to produce the final catalyst. The catalysts were labelled as CZ (contains no Ga) and CZG-xGa (x indicates the mole % of Ga)-see Table 1. A typical measured surface area of CZG5Ga was 84.6 m.sup.2g.sup.1. Two equal portions of the powders were rinsed in acetone for 1 h (CZG5Ga-A1) and 18 h (CZG5Ga-A2) before they were dried. The measured surface areas were 82.0 m.sup.2g.sup.1 and 93.7 m.sup.2g.sup.1, respectively. The procedure for the synthesis is graphically summarized in FIG. 2.

Example 2

Powdered X-ray Diffraction (XRD)

[0154] The X-ray diffraction (XRD) profile was collected by a Philips PW-1729 diffractometer with Bragg-Brentano focusing geometry using Cu Ka radiation (lambda=1.5418 ) from a generator operating at 40 kV and 40 mA. Table 2 shows the phase symbol, chemical formula and PDF number which are used in this work.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Phase symbol, chemical formula and PDF number which are used in this work. Phase symbol Formula PDF# A: aurichalcite (Cu,Zn).sub.5(CO.sub.3).sub.2(OH).sub.16 82-1253 M: Malachite (Cu,Zn).sub.2(CO.sub.3)(OH).sub.2 75-1163 Z: zincite ZnO 36-1451 T: tenorite CuO 05-0661 S: Spinel structure ZnGa.sub.2O.sub.4 86-0415 CuGa.sub.2O.sub.4 44-0183 #: Aluminum Al 85-1327

[0155] With the introduction of Ga.sup.3+ into Cu/ZnO catalyst, a series of CZG catalysts were prepared using a simple co-precipitation method with careful control of precursor injection rate, pH value and precipitation temperature to form the CZG hydroxyl-carbonate precursor phases. From the XRD patterns, a dominant, aurichalcite phase of (Cu,Zn).sub.5(CO.sub.3).sub.2(OH).sub.16 with a high dispersion of Ga species from 0, 5, 20% Ga concentration are seen in FIG. 3a for the freshly prepared samples. At the Ga concentrations of 30 or 40 mole %, zincian malachite phase of (Cu,Zn).sub.2(CO.sub.3)(OH).sub.2 are preferably formed. The formation of these two hydroxyl-carbonate phases has been widely reported in literature using related co-precipitation preparation method.sup.22. The use of high Ga concentration relative to Cu/Zn causing switching of the dominant aurichalcite phase to malachite phase is interesting. Upon 330 C. calcination (FIG. 3b), for the sample without the addition of Ga, phases of CuO and ZnO are clearly identified. As long as Ga is included, a spinel phase of MGa.sub.2O.sub.4 (MZn/Cu) phase formed together with ZnO/CuO over the whole Ga range of 5-40%.

[0156] As can be seen in FIG. 3c that samples prepared by AMO-LDH method via base solution give rise to phase pure ((Cu,Zn).sub.1xGa.sub.x)(OH).sub.2(CO.sub.3).sub.x/2.mH.sub.2O.n(C.sub.3H.sub.6O) {AMO CuZnGaCO.sub.3 LDHs} with increasing crystallinity at or above 20% Ga. The Bragg reflections at 2 ca. 12, 24, and 35 were attributed to (0 0 3), (0 0 6), and (0 0 9) crystal planes in the layered structure with a rhombohedral symmetry (R3).sup.23. The rhombohedral symmetry of LDH30Ga was further confirmed by synchrotron XRD analysis (FIG. 4a) revealing the lattice parameters of a, b=3.11 , c=22.64 . A best fit model indicates monodispersed spheres with average diameter of 9.48 nm which equivalents to an average 4 layers of the LDH structure (ultrathin LDH). In addition to intense Bragg reflections at 2=12, 24, and 35, the broad and asymmetric reflections were also observed at 2=36, 39, and 47, ascribed to (0 1 2), (0 1 5), and (0 1 8) crystal planes, respectively for the sample with the highest 40% Ga loading (FIG. 4b). This indicates a homogeneous dispersion of various cations in the hydroxide layers.sup.24. No other crystalline phases are observed from the LDH samples of 20, 30 and 40% mole Ga. The three Ga concentrations correspond to LDH structure of (Cu.sub.45Zn.sub.41Ga.sub.14)(OH).sub.2(CO.sub.3).sup.7, (Cu.sub.47ZN.sub.32Ga.sub.21)(OH).sub.2(CO.sub.3).sub.10.5 and (Cu.sub.49Zn.sub.22Ga.sub.29)(OH).sub.2(CO.sub.3).sub.14.5; respectively according to the ICP analyses (Table 1). The 30% mole Ga sample is expected to be more stable than the other two samples. This is because the stability of LDH structure depends critically on electrostatic/steric effect(s)at M.sup.2+: M.sup.3+ ratio. For example, M.sup.3+/M.sup.2+>0.5 in the latter formulation with finite Ga.sup.3+ size may create a large distortion in LDH layers. Similarly, the lower M.sup.3+/M.sup.2+ ratio in 20% mole Ga is anticipated to be relatively unstable as compared to the conformation of amorphous precipitates (such as hydroxides and hydroxycarbonates).sup.23. Below this Ga concentration, amorphous phase is recorded. Similarly, adding 40 mole % Ga in the synthesis (M.sup.3+/M.sup.2+>0.5) leads to stronger electrostatic interaction between the layers due to the presence of higher amount of stoichiometric intercalated carbonate anions. This creates thicker LDH layers (FIGS. 4b-d), which is difficult to disrupt (exfoliate) by the AMO solvent treatment. Interestingly, by using the same calcination temperature to the LDH samples as was prepared to the CZG samples, no formation of spinel structure occurred (FIG. 3d). This clearly indicates that LDHs have a kinetically more stable phase than the hydroxyl-carbonate phases. Although the AMO-LDHs may show lower decomposition temperatures compared to those prepared by conventional synthesis, LDHs normally have two typical distinct thermal events around 200 C. (noted as T1) and 400 C. (noted as T2) evaluated by thermogravimetric analysis (FIG. 4e). The weight loss below T1 is due to desorption of physisorbed and intercalated solvents, which will form a reversible amorphous phase. After T1, the hydroxyl groups start to decompose and gradually transform the LDH structure. This reaches a maximum at above 400 C. (T2), and is ascribed to the partial decomposition of carbonate anions and complete dehydroxylation of the metal hydroxide layers.sup.21. Thus, the use of 330 C. calcination temperature only gives the single amorphous phase derived from (Cu.sub.47Zn.sub.32Ga.sub.21)(OH).sub.2(CO.sub.3).sub.10.5 LDH structure (30% mole Ga in receipe) without reaching the second stage of the layer structure collapse.

Example 3

Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM)

[0157] TEM images were taken using a JEOL 2010 Transmission Electron Microscope at 200 kV. The sample particles were deposited on an Agar Scientific Holey carbon supported copper 400 mesh grid. TEM samples were prepared by sonicating a suitable amount of material in 1 mL ethanol for 15 minutes before drop wise adding the solution onto the copper grid.

[0158] Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) measurements were collected by Agilent 5400 microscope. AFM samples were prepared by deposition of fresh diluted emulsion of LDH samples onto a clean Si wafer by dip coating. The images were obtained with a Si tip cantilever (MikroMasch NSC35/ALBS) working with frequency and force constant of 150 kHz and 4.52 N.Math.m.sup.1, respectively, using non-contact mode in air at room temperature. Images were recorded with 512512 pixels and 0.5-1 Hz scan rate. Processing and analysis of the images were carried out using the PicoView version 1.20.2 software.

[0159] In order to determine the textural properties of these samples, TEM and AFM were employed. FIG. 5a and b show the typical images of the freshly-prepared hydroxycarbonate phase of CZG5Ga and CZG40Ga prepared by co-precipitation method. It appears that the extended fibrous/sheet like structure is fragmentized in the presence of higher Ga concentration, giving many smaller sizes of mixed phases. On the other hand, the LDH5Ga is similar in textual appearance as CZG5Ga although small sheet-like features are occasionally observed (FIG. 5c). It is noted that the XRD of the AMO-LDH samples with low Ga concentration (LDH5Ga and LDH10Ga) in FIG. 3c show no indication of LDH phase formation. Their M.sup.2+:M.sup.3+ is outside the stability range for LDHs, but probably some mixed phases of hydroxyl-carbonate structures of below the detection limit by the XRD are made, hence giving mixed shapes (particles/fibrous/sheets) in appearance. It is interesting to see the homogeneous sheet-like structure when 30% Ga was used (LDH30Ga), which agrees with the expected layered LDH structure identified by the XRD (FIG. 3c). In addition, single and extremely thin layers of LDH sheets (SXRD shows an average of 4 LDH layers, see FIG. 4a) are indeed evidenced: the morphology matches with their anticipated high surface area (FIG. 2) when acetone was used.

[0160] FIG. 6a shows the TEM images of the CZG5Ga after calcination in air atmosphere, suggesting that the formation of mixed metal oxides (appeared as sphere-like particles) can be observed. FIG. 6b-c shows the images of the reduced CZG5Ga sample prepared with H.sub.2 treatment at 290 C. (2 h), which gave 5-10 nm Cu rich (shown by EDX) particles with occasionally much larger particles observed. In contrast, the image of calcined LDH30Ga (FIG. 7a) reveals multiple curved sheets assembled mostly of single discrete layers with some edge regions of 2-3 staggered layers, indicating the AMO-LDH precursor can maintain its ultra-thin layered morphology in spite of exhibiting an amorphous phase (FIG. 3d) after calcination. Under identical hydrogen treatment shown in FIGS. 7b-c, many small and rather homogeneous size Cu-rich particles of less than 5 nm (mean size=4.00.1 nm) are formed on this positive charged sheet-like structure. In line with the morphology observation of the reduced catalysts, the reduction behavior of the AMO-LDH samples, see FIG. 8, displays more uniform peak profiles compared to the CZG samples. The controlled reduction with the formation of smaller Cu seeds in the AMO-LDH sample clearly reflects that Cu species must be engaged in a stable LDH structure, which offers the fine controlled nucleation and restricted mobility of metal atoms by the high surface, discrete inorganic sheets, thus can lead to small, stable, and homogeneous Cu particles.

[0161] The striking reduction in the number of cationic layers via acetone (AMO-solvent) inter-layer disruption produced by the AMO-LDH method (fine particle portion) can be identified by AFM on the 30% Ga (M.sup.2+/M.sup.3+=2.33) sample (FIG. 5e). As can be seen from FIG. 5f that the typical height profile of LDH30Ga sample clearly shows a thickness between 0.8-2.3 nm for selected regions, which corresponds to 1-3 layer LDH platelet according to a 3-layer LDH30Ga structural model intercalated with carbonate anions as depicted in FIG. 5g (for the single cationic layer, the structure stabilized by adsorbed carbonate anions is anticipated). The formation of such ultra-thin nanosheets which separated by discrete cationic layers and balanced by intercalated carbonate anions suggests that acetone dispersion can override the weaker interlayer electrostatic interaction, thus accounting for the dramatic increase in surface area of this sample.

Example 4

Temperature Programmed Reduction (TPR)

[0162] TPR measurements were obtained using a ThermoQuest TPRO 110 instrument. Inside the TPR quartz tube, 0.026 g of the calcined catalyst sample was sandwiched between two layers of glass wool with a thermocouple placed in contact with the sample. The TPR tube was then inserted into the instrument for a helium pretreatment. The helium gas pretreatment (He running through the TPR tube at 10 mL min.sup.1 at a temperature ramp of 10 C. min.sup.1 from 40 to 150 C., then held for 5 min before cooling) cleaned the catalyst surface by removing any absorbed ambient gas molecules. After the pretreatment, a reduction treatment (5% H.sub.2 in Argon flowing through the TPR tube at 20 mL min.sup.1 at a temperature ramp of 10 C. min.sup.1 from 40 to 400 C., then held at 400 C. for 30 min before cooling to room temperature) was carried out to reduce the Cu.sup.2+ within the sample. Cu(II)O was reduced to Cu.sup.0 by the flow of hydrogen gas in the reduction treatment. The consumption of hydrogen gas changed the conductivity of the gas stream; hence, the change in conductivity was measured and calibrated as a function of both temperature and time to produce the TPR profile.

[0163] The reduction behaviour of calcined CZG and LDH samples was investigated by H.sub.2-TPR, and the corresponding reduction profiles are given in FIG. 8. FIG. 8 shows that all samples give virtually the same integral reduction peak area of 5.00.5 mmole H.sub.2/g-cat corresponding to the complete reduction of Cu.sup.2+ toCu.sup.0. It is however, interesting to note from FIG. 8a that CZG samples display a complex reduction peak accompanied by shoulders in the temperature range of 150-270 C. This indicates that some reduced Cu species exist in heterogeneous chemical environments (variation in size and structure) hence giving different peak maxima at different reduction temperatures. The reduction range of 150-200 C. (low temperature shoulder) matches with Cu.sub.2O but its content diminishes at higher Ga loading.sup.22. The higher temperature main peak is attributed to the reduction of CuO. Such a large variation in reduction behaviour of Cu.sup.+ and Cu.sup.2+ would be expected to give large Cu particle size variation as clearly evidenced in the corresponding TEM images (FIG. 6b-c). Without Ga (no spinel), a higher temperature is required for Cu.sup.2+ reduction.

[0164] On the other hand, the reduction profile of more homogeneous LDH samples shown in FIG. 8b gives more uniform peak profile but at higher temperature range of 200-290 C. than that of CZG samples, with no low temperature shoulder peak (absence of Cu.sub.2O). This observation also matches the TEM investigation (FIG. 7b-c) that smaller and homogeneous Cu particles can be formed from the reduction of more stable LDH phase. The controlled reduction at higher temperature with smaller seeds clearly reflects that the majority of Cu.sup.2+ must be engaged in a more stable LDH structure.

Example 5

Cu Surface Area and Dispersion

[0165] The dispersion (D.sub.Cu) and exposed surface area (S.sub.Cu) of Cu were determined by dissociative N.sub.2O chemisorption followed by hydrogen pulse reduction. N.sub.2O chemisorption was carried out on a Micromeritics AutoChem II 2920 instrument. Before the measurement, 100 mg of calcined sample was reduced at 350 C. in a 5% H.sub.2/Ar mixture (50 mL.Math.min.sup.1) for 4 h. After cooling to 60 C., the sample was exposed to N.sub.2O (20 mL.Math.min.sup.1) for 1 h to ensure complete oxidation of surface metallic copper to Cu.sub.2O. Finally, calibrated hydrogen pulse reduction at 300 C. was conducted to determine the amount of surface Cu.sub.2O species. D.sub.Cu and S.sub.Cu were then calculated by dividing the amount of surface copper by the actual Cu loading determined by ICP-MS.

[0166] As previously discussed, Cu surface is generally believed to provide active sites for CO.sub.2 hydrogenation.sup.7,8. As a result, it is important to determine the Cu surface area and dispersion for each of the CZG and LDH catalysts. The Cu loading (determined by ICP), Cu dispersion and Cu surface area/g-cat (determined by N.sub.2O chemisorption.sup.22,23) for all Cu containing CZG and LDH catalysts were determined accordingly and are shown in Table 3. It is clear from the compiled Cu surface areas and Cu dispersions that CZG samples give consistently lower values than LDH samples, which agrees with a similar behavior observed for the BET surface area analysis that CZG precursors have much lower specific surface areas than the LDH precursors. This again indicates the controlled reduction of Cu.sup.2+ from high intrinsic surface area. It also shows that the stable LDH structure prerpared by the AMO technique.sup.21 can lead to smaller Cu particles. The best Cu dispersion is seen to be 30 mol % Ga in receipe concentration, which gave the smallest Cu particles having the highest Cu surface area (see Table 3).

TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 Comparison of Cu loading (determined by ICP), Cu dispersion and Cu surface area/g-cat determined by N.sub.2O chemisorption) for all Cu containing CZG and LDH catalysts. Catalysts Cu loading.sup.a (wt %) Cu dispersion.sup.b S.sub.Cu.sup.b (m.sup.2/g.sub.cat) CZ 33.4 21.8 46.8 CZG5Ga 31.9 22.0 45.2 CZG10Ga 33.9 19.5 42.7 CZG30Ga 32.7 19.6 41.3 CZG40Ga 33.5 21.1 45.5 LDH10Ga 34.3 24.4 53.8 LDH20Ga 33.4 33.8 72.8 LDH30Ga 33.5 46.0 99.2 LDH40Ga 37.9 22.6 55.3 LDH30Ga-ww 34.3 28.1 62.2 (water wash) .sup.aDetermined by ICP; .sup.bDispersion and specific surface area of metallic Cu determined by N.sub.2O chemisorption.

Example 6

X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy (XPS)

[0167] After reduction at 290 C., samples were carefully transferred in a glove bag filled with nitrogen to prevent the air exposure and analyzed by XPS. The XPS was performed using a Quantum 2000 Scanning ESCA Microprob instrument (Physical Electronics) equipped with an Al K X-ray radiation source (hv=1486.6 eV). A flood gun with variable electron voltage (from 6 eV to 8 eV) was used for charge compensation. The raw data were corrected for substrate charging with the BE of the C peak (284.5 eV), as shown in the XPS handbook. The measured spectra were fitted using a least-squares procedure to a product of Gaussian-Lorentzian functions after removing the background noise. The concentration of each element was calculated from the area of the corresponding peak and calibrated with the sensitivity factor of Wagner.

[0168] The XPS results of the LDH samples with various Ga contents are revealed in FIG. 9. FIG. 9a clearly shows that the progressive increase in Ga peak size at increasing Ga content. In comparison with the peak position with reference to adventurous carbon, Ga is still maintained as Ga.sup.3+ with no sign of reduction.sup.25. However, the positions of 2p.sub.1/2 and 2p.sub.3/2 of Cu (FIG. 9b) match well with those of Cu and their peak sizes remain the same at increasing Ga concentrations. This again suggests that Cu.sup.2+ is totally reduced from the LDH samples upon the pre-reduction treatment in H.sub.2 at 290 C. The peak position of Zn 2p.sub.3/2 shown in FIG. 9c of LDH samples matches with Zn.sup.2+ showing that it stays unreduced in the solid structure.sup.25. However, there is a small degree of Zn.sup.2+ reduction to Zn.sup.0 at the Ga concentrations of 20 and 30 mole % which correspond to the maximum amounts of LDH phases with high surface areas. Through careful deconvolution, the broader peak can be into two sub-peaks of Zn.sup.2+ (1023 eV) and Zn.sup.0 (1021 eV). Comparatively, LDH5Ga, LDH10Ga and LDH40Ga shows no Zn.sup.0 signal which is probably due to their low surface area that cannot facilitate the reduction of ZnO.

Example 7

CO.SUB.2 .Hydrogenation

[0169] Catalytic tests in hydrogenation of CO.sub.2 to produce methanol were carried out in a tubular fixed bed reactor (12.7 mm outside diameter) by using a catalyst weight of 0.1 g. CO.sub.2/H.sub.2 reaction mixture with molar ratio of 1:3 was fed at a rate of 30 stp mL min.sup.1 (stp=standard temperature and pressure; P=101.3 kPa, T=298 K) through the catalyst bed. Before each test, the catalyst was pre-reduced at 290 C. for 2 h under the H.sub.2 flow (20 stp mL min.sup.1). The products were analysed by a gas chromatograph equipped with calibrated thermal conductivity detector (TCD) and flame ionization detector (FID).

[0170] The catalytic performances of Cu containing CZG and LDH samples were evaluated and are presented in FIG. 10 and FIG. 11, respectively. The major product for all catalysts is methanol and the main by-product is CO under operating conditions of H.sub.2:CO.sub.2 (molar)=3:1, T=190-310 C., P=4.5 MPa and WHSV=18,000 mL.g.sub.cat.h.sup.1. The activity measurements were taken after at least 2 h on the stream at each selected temperature. FIG. 10 shows similar performances of CZ and CZG samples due to their similar Cu surface areas and dispersions (Table 3). In general, CZG5Ga shows a slightly better performance than all the other CZG samples. The methanol yield reaches the optimal value at 280-290 C. and drops with further increasing temperature which suggests the approach of the thermodynamic limit. Interestingly, according to FIG. 11, the LDH samples which show higher Cu surface areas and dispersions, particularly the LDH20Ga and LDH30Ga (see Table 3) also give higher methanol selectivities and yields than CZG5Ga at 270 C. LDH30Ga gave the best catalytic performance, achieving an 8% methanol yield. This supports the literature's suggestion that the Cu surface provides active sites for this hydrogenation reaction.sup.7. It is thus advantageous to make larger surface Cu with higher metal dispersion (smaller Cu particle size) from a stable solid precursor upon reduction. In this respect, LDH Cu containing samples appear to be more superior to those prepared by conventional co-precipitation. FIG. 9 also indicates that there is a small degree of deep reduction of Zn.sup.2+ to Zn.sup.0 over these samples. As a result, it becomes more significant for those samples (CZG5Ga, LDH20Ga and LDH30Ga) with higher Cu dispersions. The higher Zn/Cu ratios revealed in FIG. 12 show a good correlation with methanol yields with both CZG and LDH samples which suggest the importance of Zn decoration on Cu cluster for optimal methanol synthesis.

[0171] FIG. 13 shows a comparison of the Cu containing LDH30Ga with and without the acetone treatment. Clearly, the higher surface area and thinner LDH precursor LDH30Ga-Aw with acetone treatment (158.7 m.sup.2g.sup.1) gave higher conversion and yield than that of LDH30Ga-Ww (36.5 m.sup.2g.sup.1) towards methanol in the hydrogenation of CO.sub.2. Thus, the exposure of ultrathin LDH can allow controlled reductions of Cu and Zn from the layer structure to give higher Cu dispersion decorated with Zn atoms which form active sites for this catalyzed reaction.

[0172] The catalytic performances of CZG5Ga and the commercial HiFUEL catalyst has been compared with LDH30Ga with and without acetone treatment having comparable Cu loadings (FIG. 14). LDH30Ga (acetone washing) exhibits better performances amongst the four samples. when the final wet slurry of LDH was dispersed with an AMO solvent (acetone), it dramatically enhances the surface area of the final material (S.sub.LDH30Ga=158.710.17 m.sup.2g.sup.1 vs S.sub.LDH30Ga-Ww=36.510.10 m.sup.2g.sup.1, FIG. 1) by exfoliating the cationic multilayers (intercalated with carbonate anions) approaching to 1-3 layers. This discrete cationic layer can facilitate the formation of small (4 nm) and homogeneous Cu particles decorated with trace Zn atoms with narrow size distribution, which lead to higher CO.sub.2 conversion and methanol production. In comparison with other reported Cu containing LDH samples, the simple and non-optimized AMO-LDH (LDH30Ga) sample shows increased weight time yield of methanol, and can sustain a higher GHSV (Table 4).

TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 Comparison of methanol space time yields of selected catalysts with the catalysts of the invention Reaction conditions P Catalytic (bar), T Performance Catalyst ( C.) Space velocity H.sub.2/CO.sub.2 STY.sup.b Ref. LDH30Ga 45, (W) 18000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.6 This 270 h.sup.1 work LDH30Ga-ww 45, (W) 18000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.3 270 h.sup.1 CZG5Ga 45, (W) 18000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.4 270 h.sup.1 JM-HiFUEL 45, (W) 18000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.4 270 h.sup.1 LDH (Cu, Zn, Al, Y) 50, (W) 10000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.4 23 250 h.sup.1 Cu on LDH (Zn, Al, Zr) 50, (W) 7500 mL g.sup.1 3 0.3 26 supports 250 h.sup.1 LDH (Cu, Zn, Al, Y) 50, (W) 12000 mL g.sup.1 3 0.5 27 250 h.sup.1 LDH (Cu, Zn, Al, Ga) 60, (W) 10000 mL g.sup.1 Syngas ~0.4 28 250 h.sup.1 H.sub.2:CO:CO.sub.2:He = 72:10:4:14 In.sub.2O.sub.3/ZrO.sub.2 50, (G) 16,000 h.sup.1 4 0.3 29 300 Pd@Zn 45, (W) 18000 mL g.sup.1 3 ~0.6 30 270 h.sup.1 .sup.a(G) = GHSV = volume flow rate/bed volume, (W) = WHSV = mass flow rate/catalyst mass. .sup.bSpace time yield of methanol (g.sub.MeOH .Math. g.sub.cat.sup.1 .Math. h.sup.1)

[0173] FIG. 15 provides a correlation of the catalytic performance with Cu surface area for CZG and LDH samples.

[0174] While specific embodiments of the invention have been described herein for the purpose of reference and illustration, various modifications will be apparent to a person skilled in the art without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

[0175] REFERENCES [0176] 1. Yu, K. M. Curcic, I. Gabriel, J. & Tsang, S. C. E. ChemSusChem. 1, 893-899 (2008). [0177] 2. Turner, J. et al. Int. J. Energy Res. 32, 379-407 (2008). [0178] 3. Song, C. Catal. Today. 115, 2-32 (2006). [0179] 4. Fujitani, T. Nakamura, J. Appl. Catal. A. 191, 111-129 (2000). [0180] 5. Liao, F. Zeng, Z. Eley, C. Lu, Q. Hong, X. & Tsang, S. C. E. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 51, 5832-5836 (2012). [0181] 6. Zander, S. et al. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52, 6536-6540 (2013). [0182] 7. Spencer, M. S. Top. Catal. 8, 259-266 (1999). [0183] 8. Fujitani, T. & Nakamura, J. Catal. Lett. 56, 119-124 (1998). [0184] 9. Kanai, Y. et al. Catal. Lett. 27, 67-78 (1994). [0185] 10. Fujita, S. Usui, M. Ito, H. Takezawa, N. J. Catal. 157, 403-413 (1995). [0186] 11. Choi, Y. Futagami, K. Fujitani, T. Nakamura, J. Appl. Catal. A. 208, 163-167 (2001). [0187] 12. Behrens, M. et al. Science. 336, 593-897 (2012). [0188] 13. Arena, F. Barbera, K. Italiano, G. Bonura, G. & Spadaro, L. J. Catal. 249, 185-194 (2007). [0189] 14. Saito, M. Fujitani, T. Takeuchi, M. & Watanabe, T. Appl. Catal. A. 138, 311-318 (1996). [0190] 15. Kurtz, M. Wilmer, H. Genger, T. Hinrichsen, O. & Muhler, M. Catal. Lett. 86, 77-80 (2003). [0191] 16. An, X. et al. Catal. Lett. 118, 264-269 (2007). [0192] 17. Weigel, J. Koeppel, R. A. Baiker, A. & Wokaun, A. Langmuir. 12, 5319-5329 (1996). [0193] 18. Yu, K. M. et al. Nat. Commun. 3, 1230 (2012). [0194] 19. Tong, W. Cheung, K. West, A. Yu, K. M. & Tsang, S. C. E. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 15, 7240-7248 (2013). [0195] 20. Tong, W. West, A. Cheung, K. Yu, K. M. & Tsang, S. C. E. ACS catal. 3, 1231-1244 (2013 [0196] 21. Chen, C. Yang, M. Wang, Q. Buffet, J. C. & O'Hare, D. J. Mater. Chem. A. 2, 15102-15110 (2014). [0197] 22. Li, M. M-J. Zheng, J. Qu, J. Liao, F. Raine, E. Kuo, W. C. H. Su, S. S. Po, P. Yuan Y. & Tsang, S. C. E. Sci. Rep. 6, 20527 (2016). [0198] 23. Gao, P. Zhong, L. Zhang, L. Wang, H. Zhao, N. Wei, W. & Sun, Y. Catal. Sci. Technol. 5, 4365-4377 (2015). [0199] 24. Cheng, J. Wang, X. P. Yu, J. J. Hao, Z. P. & Xu, Z. P. J. Phys. Chem. C. 115, 6651-6660 (2011). [0200] 25. Data from Thermal Scientific XPS (http://xpssimplified.com/index.php). [0201] 26. Gao, P. Feng, L. Xiao, F. Zhao, N. Wei, W. Zhong, L. & Sun, Y. Catal. Today. 194, 9-15 (2012). [0202] 27. Gao, P.; Li, F.; Zhao, N.; Xiao, F.; Wei, W.; Zhong, L.; Sun, Y. Influence of Modifier (Mn, La, Ce, Zr and Y) on the Performance of Cu/Zn/Al Catalysts via Hydrotalcite-like Precursors for CO.sub.2 Hydrogenation to Methanol. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 468, 442-452 (2013). [0203] 28. Khl, S. Schumann, J. Kasatkina, I. Hvecker, M. Schlgl, R. & Behrens, M. Catal. Today. 246, 92-100 (2015). [0204] 29. Martin, O.; Martin, A. J.; Mondelli, C.; Mitchell, S.; Segawa, T. F.; Hauert, R.; Drouilly, C.; Curulla-Ferr, D.; Prez-Ramirez, J. Indium Oxide as a Superior Catalyst for Methanol Synthesis by CO.sub.2 Hydrogenation. Angew. Chemie-Int. Ed., 55, 6261-6265 (2016). [0205] 30. Liao, F.; Wu, X.-P.; Zheng, J.; Li, M. M.-J.; Kroner, A.; Zeng, Z.; Hong, X.; Yuan, Y.; Gong, X.-Q.; Tsang, S. C. E. A Promising Low Pressure Methanol Synthesis Route from CO.sub.2 Hydrogenation over Pd@Zn Core-shell Catalysts. Green Chem., 19, 270-280 (2017).