Optical Switching Systems
20200021383 ยท 2020-01-16
Inventors
- Brian Robertson (Cambridge, GB)
- Daping Chu (Cambridge, GB)
- Haining Yang (Cambridge, GB)
- Peter John Wilkinson (Cambridge, GB)
Cpc classification
H04Q2011/0026
ELECTRICITY
H04J14/0212
ELECTRICITY
International classification
Abstract
We describe a wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) reconfigurable optical switch, the switch comprising: a set of arrays of optical beam connections, each comprising an array of optical outputs and having an optical input to receive a WDM input optical signal; a first diffractive element to demultiplexed said WDM input optical signal into a plurality of demultiplexed optical input beams, and to disperse said demultiplexed optical input beams spatially along a first axis; first relay optics between said set of arrays of optical beam connections and said first diffractive element; and a reconfigurable holographic array comprising a 2D array of reconfigurable sub-holograms defining sub-hologram rows and columns; wherein said arrays of said set of arrays are at least one dimensional arrays extending spatially in a direction parallel to said first axis and arranged in a column defining a second axis orthogonal to said first axis; wherein said sub-hologram rows are aligned along said first axis, and wherein said sub-hologram columns are aligned along said second axis; wherein a number of said sub-hologram rows corresponds to a number of arrays in said set of arrays; and wherein each sub-hologram row is configured to receive a set of demultiplexed optical input beams at different carrier wavelengths demultiplexed from the optical input for the array of the set of arrays to which the row corresponds; wherein each of said sub-holograms in a sub-hologram row is reconfigurable to steer a respective wavelength channel of the WDM input signal for the array to which the sub-hologram row corresponds, towards a selected said optical output for the array; and wherein each said sub-hologram row is configured to steer the demultiplexed optical input beams for a respective array of the set of arrays of optical beam connections.
Claims
1. A wavelength division multiplexed (WDM) reconfigurable optical switch, the switch comprising: a set of arrays of optical beam connections, each comprising an array of optical outputs and having an optical input configured to receive a WDM input optical signal; a first diffractive element configured to demultiplex said WDM input optical signal into a plurality of demultiplexed optical input beams, and to disperse said demultiplexed optical input beams spatially along a first axis; first relay optics between said set of arrays of optical beam connections and said first diffractive element; and a reconfigurable holographic array comprising a spatial light modulator (SLM) comprising a 2D array of reconfigurable subholograms defining sub-hologram rows and columns; a driver coupled to said SLM having a control data input configured to control driving said SLM with said sub-holograms to steer said demultiplexed optical input beams from the optical inputs of each of said set of arrays to selected said optical outputs of the arrays; wherein said arrays of said set of arrays are at least one dimensional arrays and arranged in a column defining a second axis orthogonal to said first axis; wherein said sub-hologram rows are aligned along said first axis, and wherein said sub-hologram columns are aligned along said second axis; and wherein each sub-hologram row is configured to receive a set of demultiplexed optical input beams at different carrier wavelengths demultiplexed from the optical input for an array of the set of arrays; wherein each of said sub-holograms in a sub-hologram row is reconfigurable to steer a respective wavelength channel of the WDM input signal for an array towards a selected said optical output for the array; and wherein each said sub-hologram row is configured to steer the demultiplexed optical input beams for an array of the set of arrays of optical beam connections.
2. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein said arrays of optical outputs are 2D arrays, and wherein each of said sub-holograms in a subhologram row is reconfigurable to steer a wavelength channel of the WDM input in two dimensions towards said selected optical output.
3. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein the optical input of each said array of optical outputs is substantially coplanar with at least some of said optical outputs, and wherein said reconfigurable holographic array has an associated reflector to fold an optical path between the optical input and output of each said array.
4. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein said first relay optics comprise non-telecentric optics; wherein the optical input of each said array defines an input axis for the array; and wherein optical output beams from said first relay optics towards the optical outputs of the array have axes which diverge away from said input axis.
5. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 having a virtual optical output array plane between said first relay optics and said set of arrays of optical output beam connections; and comprising telecentric magnification optics between said virtual optical output array plane and a plane defined by at least some of said optical beam connections.
6. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein the optical outputs of each array lie in a square or hexagonal grid.
7. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein the optical input of each said array defines an input axis for the array, and wherein said input axis is tilted with respect to an optical axis of said reconfigurable holographic array such that a zeroth order beam reflected from said reconfigurable holographic array avoids re-entering said optical input.
8. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 7 wherein said optical input is offset from the centre of the array, and wherein said zeroth order beam is dumped into an unused said optical output.
9. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein modulation of said demultiplexed optical input beams elongates said beams along said first axis, and wherein said steering in two dimensions comprises deflecting a said demultiplexed optical input beam in a direction parallel to said first axis.
10. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 wherein a number of sub-holograms in a said sub-hologram row is controllable dependent upon bandwidth of the demultiplexed optical input beams dispersed along the sub-hologram row.
11. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1 further comprising: a second set of arrays of optical beam connections, each having an optical output to provide a WDM output optical signal and comprising an array of optical inputs; wherein each optical input of said second set of arrays is optically coupled to an optical output of said set of arrays of said switch; a second diffractive element to disperse input beams from said second set of arrays spatially along a third axis; second relay optics between said second set of arrays of optical beam connections and said second diffractive element; a second reconfigurable holographic array comprising an array of reconfigurable sub-holograms defining second sub-holograms rows and columns; wherein said second sub-hologram rows are aligned along said third axis and wherein each second sub-hologram row is configured to receive said dispersed input beams from one of said second set of arrays; and wherein each of said sub-holograms in a second sub-hologram row is reconfigurable to steer a respective input beam towards the optical output of an array of the second set of arrays.
12. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 11 comprising one or more drivers to control said reconfigurable holographic array and said second reconfigurable holographic array in tandem to route a selected wavelength channel from a selected optical input of said switch to a selected optical output of said second set of arrays.
13. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1, wherein said optical input is offset from the centre of the array, and wherein said zeroth order beam is dumped into the centre of the array.
14. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1, wherein the input and output ports of at least one array of the set of arrays are spaced along the second axis.
15. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1, wherein the steering comprises deflecting a said demultiplexed optical input beam in at least one dimension.
16. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1, further comprising anamorphic switch optics configured to elongate the demultiplexed optical input beams along the second axis.
17. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 16, wherein the anamorphic switch optics comprise cylindrical optics.
18. A WDM reconfigurable optical switch as claimed in claim 1, wherein the subholograms are rectangular.
Description
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
[0033] These and other aspects of the invention will now be further described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying figures in which:
[0034]
[0035]
[0036]
[0037]
[0038]
[0039]
[0040]
[0041]
[0042]
[0043]
[0044]
[0045]
[0046]
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
[0047] Referring to
[0048] As illustrated in
[0049] An array of M objective lenses L.sub.A is provided on the same pitch as the input/output port arrays. These may be provided by a lenslet array. In embodiments these lenses each have substantially the same focal length F.sub.A, but again this is not essential. In embodiments light from an input port 102 of, for example, a cluster of fibres is collimated by the corresponding objective lenslet of array L.sub.A at plane P.sub.0. Thus, for example, an objective lenslet may expand the input mode field radius from, say, around 5 m to around 50 m beam waist, to cover a useful area of a sub-hologram for efficient diffraction. In
[0050] In the illustrated embodiment the system includes relay optics L.sub.1, L.sub.2 to either side of a grating 106 (at plane P.sub.9), to image plane P.sub.0 at the plane of a spatial light modulator (SLM) 108, P.sub.SLM), and vice versa. As illustrated lenses L.sub.1, L.sub.2 comprise a 4f relay system which images plane P.sub.0 onto the SLM via a static diffractive element 106. In the illustrated embodiment this comprises a static grating which demultiplexes the WDM input signals into a plurality of demultiplexed wavelengths, spectrally dispersing the input wavelengths across the SLM plane in the x-direction. This is illustrated in
[0051] In embodiments the SLM 108 is a reflective LCOS (liquid crystal on silicon) SLM with M rows of sub-holograms, one for each of the input/output port arrays S.sub.1that is one for each of the stacked wavelength selective switches associated with a respective input/output port array. Thus
[0052] As illustrated the demultiplexed beams 112 are shown as circular but, as the skilled person will appreciate, such a beam is modulated with data, the modulation expanding the range of wavelengths occupied by the beam. Thus a modulated beam will, in practice, be elongated in the x-direction (that is along the axis of dispersion), as schematically illustrated by profile 112. As illustrated in
[0053] Referring to
[0054] Such holograms may, for example, be pre-calculated and stored in non-volatile memory 120 coupled to driver 116. Thus when the driver receives a control signal for the switch on line 122, to direct an input of array S.sub.1 at a specific wavelength to a selected output, the appropriate stored sub-hologram may be selected from memory 120 for display at the position along a row corresponding to the selected wavelength. Alternatively grating data may be calculated as needed, for example using (inverse) Fourier transform hardware to calculate the grating from an inverse Fourier transform of the target diffracted spot (output beam location).
[0055] Example Sub-Hologram Phase Pattern Calculation
[0056] Many techniques may be employed to calculate a suitable sub-hologram phase pattern given a target desired output field. One example procedure is the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm, which is illustrated by the following pseudo-Matlab code:
TABLE-US-00001 gin = Amplitude distribution of input field (Gaussian profile assumed) grossout = Desired output field (the target function). For example, if we have GN addressable output points grossout = zeros(GN); grossout(position 1) = 1; grossout(position 2) = 1; Sets two points to have equal amplitude and the other points zero amplitude gprime = Kinoform phase pattern for ite=1:200 if ite==1 % start with result of geometrical ray-tracing (initial starting point FFT of input field) ftg=fftshift(fft(fftshift(gin))); else % All other iterations use this (FFT of input fieldexp(i*phase of hologram)) ftg=fftshift(fft(fftshift(gin.*exp(i.*gprime)))); end % Calculate the phase of ftg (dump amplitude information) angle_ftg=angle(ftg); % Then to get the hologram phase we take the IFFT of the target function multiplied by exp(i*the phase of angle_ftg) gprime=angle(fftshift(ifft(fftshift(grossout.*exp(i.*angle_ftg))))); end
[0057] As previously mentioned, it may be desirable to incorporate focussing power within a sub-hologram, for example to reduce cross-talk. In embodiments such an approach may comprise deliberately introducing a distorting optical element and then correcting an output beam (of a desired diffraction order) to compensate for the distortion. This may leave other diffraction orders/beams uncompensated so that they remain unfocussed, again to mitigate crosstalk, in particular as described in our earlier published application WO2012/123713 (incorporated by reference). A suitable distorting element is, for example, an axicon, which introduces a ring focus.
[0058] If it is desired to introduce focussing (or defocusing) into a displayed hologram this can be achieved straightforwardly by employing a fractional Fourier transform in the above-outlined algorithm: as the skilled person will recognise, a fractional Fourier transform has an order a and reduces to a standard Fourier transform when a=1, but when a is different to unity a quadratic phase factor is added to the Fourier transform, which is the same type of factor that a lens imparts on an optical field. More generally one can calculate a suitable phase hologram pattern based on the transfer function of the optical system.
[0059] In a variant of the above-described approach an input beam may be multi-cast to multiple selected outputs simultaneously. In one approach this can be achieved simply by adding the holograms (that is adding the respective phases at each pixel location) for each selected output and displaying the combined result.
[0060] Referring again to
[0061] In broad terms embodiments of the system has an input/output plane at a front focal plane of the relay optics (L.sub.1, P.sub.9, L.sub.2) and an SLM at the back focal plane of the relay optics. However the system is configured to demultiplex WDM beams and, in effect, to spatially multiplex a group of wavelength selective switches in a direction (the y-direction) perpendicular to the direction of wavelength dispersion in the system. Thus because each I/O port array, for example each 33 fibre cluster, is located at a different lateral position in the y-direction, on passing through the relay lenses L.sub.1 and L.sub.2 and the demultiplexing grating 106 the input signals from the M (18) WSS input ports are dispersed in the x-direction. Moreover the input signals from the M (18) WSS input ports and will also be imaged at different lateral positions in the y-direction, and as a result independent rows of sub-holograms can be used to control the signal routing for each of the M switches. As shown in
[0062] Thus embodiments of the switch implement M individual wavelength selective switches (in the illustrated example, 18 switches) using a common relay system (L.sub.1, L.sub.2), a common demultiplexing grating 106 (P.sub.g), an SLM 108, an array of M objective lenses (L.sub.A), and a set of M (for example 33) input/output ports or fibre arrays spaced along the y-axis of the system.
[0063] We have described the switch 100 as a switch which, for each WSS, routes an input port to one (or more) selected output(s). However the skilled person will appreciate that the optical paths shown in
[0064] Extending this concept, two WDM reconfigurable optical switches, each as shown in
[0065] Thus referring to
[0066] The example of
[0067] In the example of
[0068] The skilled person will appreciate that a routing system of the type illustrated in
1. THEORY AND DETAILED EXAMPLES
[0069] We will now describe in more detail liquid crystal on silicon (LCOS) based wavelength selective switches (WSSs), more particularly the design of a stacked 1N WSS module that can be configured to operate as: [0070] 1) A 1N WSS. [0071] 2) A stack of 1N WSSs. [0072] 3) An NM WSS, or a PQ WSS, where PN and QN. [0073] 4) A collection of discrete 1N, N1, NN, and PQ WSSs.
[0074] Thus we will describe: [0075] 1) Basic operation: [0076] a. Basic operation of a 1N WSS [0077] b. 1N WSS based on elongated beams [0078] c. NN WSS based on two switching planes [0079] d. WSSs based on LCOS and waveguide technology [0080] e. Flex-spectrum data format [0081] 2) Design of a stacked 1N WSS module based on square sub-holograms:
[0082] a. Outline of module design
[0083] b. Design of a single 1N WSS based on square sub-holograms
[0084] c. Clustered output fibres
[0085] d. Two-dimensional fibre arrangements
[0086] e. Separation of input port from zeroth order
[0087] f. Wavefront encoding based on filtering at the objective lens input plane [0088] 3) Design of a stacked 1N WSS module [0089] 4) Operation of module as an NN WSS [0090] 5) Operation of module as a collection of independent 1N and NN WSSs
[0091] In addition, we employ the following terms: [0092] 1) A 1N WSS has one input port and N output ports. [0093] 2) An N1 WSS has N input ports and one output port, and is a 1N WSS used in reverse. [0094] 3) In the case of the stacked module we have S individual 1N WSSs. [0095] 4) An NN WSS has N input ports and N output ports. [0096] 5) A PQ WSS has P input ports and Q input ports. In the case of the switch module design described here, PN and QN, where N is the maximum number of output ports a 1N WSS can implement.
2. BACKGROUND
[0097] We first describe the realization of a 1N WSS based on the use of elongated beams at the LCOS SLM plane, and the realization of an NN WSS based on two separate LCOS switch planes.
[0098] 2.1. Basic Operation of a 1N WSS
[0099]
[0100] The switch comprises: [0101] 1) An input fibre. [0102] 2) Input optics, which may include polarization diversity components, and components to transform the Gaussian beam radius of the input beams to one matching the LCOS SLM sub-holograms. [0103] 3) A DEMUX component. [0104] 4) Switch optics that directs the de-multiplexed beams onto the LCOS SLM. [0105] 5) A LCOS SLM displaying an array of sub-holograms. [0106] 6) Switch optics that directs the steered beams to a MUX component. [0107] 7) A MUX component to angularly recombine the data channels. [0108] 8) Output optics, which may include polarization diversity components, and components to transform the data channels to optical modes that match the output fibre mode characteristics. [0109] 9) An output array of N output fibres.
[0110] It should be noted that, in practice, the LCOS SLM operates in reflection due to the fact that a silicon chip is used to implement the array of individually addressable electrodes that make spatial phase modulation possible. As a result, the switch is typically folded back on itself. Thus the input fibre and output fibre array are in embodiments fabricated as a single component. Similarly, in embodiments a single grating operates as both the DEMUX and MUX component, as does the input and output switch optics. This is also true for the input and output optics.
[0111] In operation: [0112] 1) Data enters the switch via a single input fibre (denoted 1, 2, 3, and 4 in this example). [0113] 1) A DEMUX component, which is typically a diffraction grating, angularly separates the data channels. [0114] 2) The switch input optics converts the light associated with each data channel into a series spatially separated Gaussian beams at the LCOS SLM plane. A corresponding series of independent sub-holograms then angularly steer the beam in two dimensions. This may be achieved by displaying quantized blazed phase gratings. [0115] 3) The steering angle is a function of both grating period and pixel size. However, in the case of a blazed grating we aim to keep the minimum number of pixels per period, p.sub.min, greater than eight pixels in order to maximize diffraction efficiency. [0116] 4) The switch output optics directs the diffracted beams to the MUX grating whilst maintaining an angle of deflection in the xy-plane as imparted by the blazed gratings. [0117] 5) The MUX component angularly re-multiplexes the signal beams so that they effectively align whilst maintaining the angle of deflection in the xy-plane as imparted by the blazed gratings. [0118] 6) The output optics then converts these deflection angles to spatial offsets in the xy-plane. In addition, the output optics ensure that the data channels couple efficiently into the correct output fibre.
[0119] The same optical configuration shown in
[0120] 2.2. 1N WSS Based on Elongated Beams
[0121] An LCOS based 1N WSS may be constructed using anamorphic (cylindrical) switch optics to convert the input signals to elongated beams at the LCOS plane, as illustrated in
[0122] For example, a 2K LCOS device is comprised of approximately 2K1K pixels. If this has to support 80 50 GHz ITU channels, one would only be able to allocate approximately 2000/80=25 pixels per sub-hologram in the y-direction, assuming this is the direction of linear dispersion of the DEMUX element. Let us assume that there is a circular Gaussian beam of radius w.sub.SLM incident on a square sub-hologram of dimensions n.sub.xn.sub.y pixels, where the pixel size is . Such a sub-hologram can steer in both the x and y-directions equally well, with a maximum radial deflection in the xy-plane dependent on the minimum number of pixels per grating period, p.sub.min, we allow. As mentioned, in practice we set this value as >8 pixels in order to maximize sub-hologram diffraction efficiency.
[0123] It can be shown that the number of discretely addressable fibres that can be steered to in a direction parallel the y-axis is given by:
[0124] In addition to the terms defined above: [0125] With respect to the switch passband we define a term .sub.SLM=n.sub.y/w.sub.SLM. This gives the ratio of the unmodulated Gaussian beam radius at a sub-hologram to the sub-hologram width. This is a key parameter in determining how cleanly transmitting data will be transmitted through the WSS, and through cascaded WSSs. To meet the passband requirements for 50 GHz channel separation, we should set .sub.SLM5. Thus there is a trade-off between passband and steering range. [0126] The term .sub.i defines the ratio of the spacing between fibres at the output plane, Y, and the Gaussian beam spot size at the output plane, w.sub.i. The larger the .sub.i the more widely separated the output beams. Typically we set Y/w.sub.i3 to minimize crosstalk.
[0127] As a result, a circularly symmetric Gaussian beam incident may cover at most 15 pixels at the LCOS SLM plane in both the x and y directions if we are dealing with a 2K LCOS SLM and 8050 GHz signal channels. Setting P.sub.min=4, .sub.SLM=5, .sub.i=3, and n.sub.y=25 results in a value for q.sub.max of 2. Thus steering in two dimensions would give a switch capacity of 8 ports assuming the fibres are arranged on a uniform grid. However, due to the low value of p.sub.min, the switch would have a high insertion loss and crosstalk. Increasing n.sub.y to 50 allows us to double the value of p.sub.min, and improve performance.
[0128] By elongating the sub-holograms along the y-axis, we can increase the number of spatially distinct locations that a sub-hologram can steer to in that axis. For example, if p.sub.min=8, .sub.SLM=3 (in the y-direction), .sub.i=3, and n.sub.y=500, then q.sub.max>40 (one can reduce .sub.SLM in the y-direction as it has no role in defining the passband). Note that we still keep .sub.SLM=5 in the x-direction (the direction parallel to the axis of wavelength dispersion) to meet the passband requirements. One can use anamorphic (cylindrical) switch optics that simultaneously image the input fibre beam in the x-axis, and create an elongated beam along the y-axis with a Fourier-transform condition between the SLM plane and the output plane along the same axis. As a result, we can steer to a sufficiently large number of output ports in the y-direction for ROADM applications. However, a drawback of this approach is that we are unable to steer the beam in the x-direction.
[0129] It should be noted that here we make a distinction here between number of fibres that can be steered to, q.sub.max, and the positional resolution of beam steering, defined as the minimum angular or spatial deflection of an output beam with respect to an output port. For example, we may be able to steer to 40 spatially separate fibres having a mode field radius of 5.2 m, but with a spatial positional steering resolution of down to 0.2 m.
[0130] 2.3. NM WSS Based on Two Switching Planes
[0131]
[0141] The switch operates as follows: [0142] 1) Optical data channels enter the switch via the N input fibres (denoted 1, 2, 3, and 4 in this example). [0143] 2) Each of the input beams are angularly de-multiplexed in the y-direction. [0144] 3) As a result, each wavelength channel from each input port illuminates a separate sub-hologram, with rows corresponding to a specific input fibre, and columns corresponding to a specific wavelength channel. [0145] 4) The first LCOS SLM displays gratings that angularly steer the beams in the yz-plane. [0146] 5) These beams are re-ordered in the y-direction when they are incident on the second LCOS plane. [0147] 6) A second set of blazed grating on the second LCOS plane then diffracts the beams such that when the MUX element recombines the wavelengths from a specific row, all wavelength channels propagate collinearly. [0148] 7) Output optics then focus the signal beams into one of the available M output fibres.
[0149] Although each sub-hologram can steer light in two-dimensions, to prevent signal contention in a WSS, light is only steered in the yz-plane between the two LCOS SLM planes. Such a system may be improved by considering the elongated beams at the sub-holograms, to maximize the values of N and M.
[0150] 2.4. Flex-Spectrum Data Format
[0151] Currently the telecom network operates using a series of wavelength channels with pre-assigned operating frequencies, known as the ITU grid. Typical channel spacing's are 100 GHz, 50 GHz, 37.5 HGz, or 25 GHz. Flex-spectrum, also referred to as Flex-grid, is a newer standard that allows for more flexible channel allocation, allowing a higher efficiency in the use of the available spectral bandwidth. In this specification when we refer to square sub-holograms, we generally (but not exclusively) refer to an unmodulated signal that has a circular Gaussian beam profile at the sub-hologram plane. As the data rate increases, the spectral content of a channel will also increase. As a result, the width of a sub-hologram will expand in the x-direction to accommodate the wavelength channel.
3. Design of a Stacked 1N WSS Module Based on Square Sub-Holograms
[0152] 3.1. Outline of Module Design
[0153] We now describe a WSS based on a stacked array of 1N WSSs and square sub-holograms. Referring to
[0154] 3.2. Design of a Single 1N WSS Based on Square Sub-Holograms
[0155] Before describing the design of a stack of S 1N WSSs, we first describe the design of a single 1N WSS switching unit. In
[0156] With reference to
[0162] The switch embodiment operates as follows: [0163] 1) The wavelength channels are launched into the switch via the central fibre in the fibre array. [0164] 2) The objective lens, L.sub.A, generates a beam waist of radius w.sub.o at plane P.sub.o. [0165] 3) The relay system images this waist at the SLM plane. [0166] 4) The LCOS SLM displays a grating of period p and orientated at an angle of with respect to the local xy-coordinate system that diffracts the light beam such that it leaves the LCOS SLM with a propagation vector of k(p,). [0167] 5) This beam is imaged by the relay system at plane P.sub.o. [0168] 6) The objective lens converts the propagation vector of k(p,) to a beam position that is offset from the optical axis. [0169] 7) The angle is controlled such that the beam is concentric with respect to the intended output fibre, thereby maximizing coupling efficiency. [0170] 8) To route each signal wavelength independently, the DEMUX grating imparts an angular displacement of B.sub.G(A) to each signal beam. The system is preferably optimized to ensure that beams are spatially separate at the LCOS plane if their frequency spacing is v.sub.FS, where v.sub.FS is the minimum local frequency slot width. [0171] 9) Each signal beam is routed independently by a sub-hologram at the LCOS plane. All the beams overlap at plane P.sub.o, albeit with different propagation vectors, denoted as k(p,,). As a result each wavelength can be separately routed to one of the N output fibres.
[0172] Note, for convenience we have drawn the DEMUX grating perpendicular to the incident optical axis. In reality the grating is preferably orientated at a specific angle for maximum diffraction efficiency, and the light will be dispersed about an optical axis that is not collinear with the incident optical axis. As a result, plane P.sub.o is an image of the LCOS SLM plane, and one can therefore treat the design problem as if the LCOS SLM were placed at P.sub.o.
[0173] 3.3. Clustered Output Fibres
[0174] It is advantageous to the switch operation to use a single lenslet element before the N output fibres, which we shall refer to as a clustered output (rather than using a coupling lenslet before each fibre).
[0175] Due to the limited number of pixels per sub-hologram we have assumed, and the limitations implied by Eq. (1), the output beams will be closely packed at the fibre array plane. For example, if we set .sub.i=3.0 to maximize the number of ports that can be steered to, the beam radius at the output plane equals the mode radius of a single mode fibre. As a consequence, the output port spacing may be very small. This may be mitigated by advances in the resolution of LCOS SLMs but additionally or alternatively this may also be mitigated by one (and in principle more) of the following example techniques: [0176] The use of a magnification stage to increase the beam separation to a point where a secondary lenslet array focuses the signal beams into spatially separated fibres. [0177] Operation of the clustered lenslet element in a non-telecentric configuration in conjunction with a secondary lenslet to focus the signal beams into spatially separated fibres
[0178]
[0179] One can also achieve a similar benefit without the use of a magnification stage by modifying the clustered output approach, as illustrated in
[0180] Here: [0181] The term p is the period of the displayed grating. [0182] w.sub.o is the incident Gaussian beam radius. [0183] (p) is the steering angle of a beam corresponding to a sub-hologram period of p at plane P.sub.o with respect to the optical axis. [0184] r((p)) is the offset of the central Gaussian beam ray with respect to the optical axis. [0185] ((p)) is angle the central Gaussian beam ray makes with respect to the optical axis of the objective lens.
[0186] In terms of geometric optics we can set the object distance, u=z.sub.1, and the image distance v=z.sub.2. Thus the height of a specific beam with respect to the optical axis plane as a function of input deflection angle, r((p)), and the angle the central ray associated with this beam makes with respect to the optical axis, ((p)) can be calculated as:
[0187] As the beams propagate at an angle to the common optical axis of the lenslet, they have a greater physical separation at the output plane. Note that a secondary lenslet array, L.sub.F, may be used to couple into the output fibres. To compensate for the angular error in the beam propagation direction, ((p)) with respect to a fibre array that is fabricated such that the fibre axes are parallel to the optical axis, one can either, for example: [0188] Arrange the fibres so that they are angled at ((p)) to minimize insertion loss. [0189] Use an array of fibres that are normal to the output plane, and offset the secondary lenslet array positions to ensure all signal beams are focused parallel to the optical axis of each fibre. [0190] Add an additional lenslet array positioned immediately before the fibre array that compensates for the angular variation, ((p)). The array is designed such that each lenslet either corrects for the arrangement of fibres associated with a single 1N WSS in the stacked switch structure, or corrects for each fibre individually.
[0191] To optimize this design Gaussian beam analysis may be performed to match the beam waist to the output fibres for the output ports.
[0192] 3.4. Two-Dimensional Fibre Arrangements
[0193] Being able to steer in two-dimensions in a WSS increases the flexibility in choosing the output fibre geometry. Examples of square packed and hexagonally packed fibre arrangements which may be used with the system are shown in
[0194] The fibre array may be fabricated from individual fibres, or the output fibre array may be implemented using a multi-core fibre containing N cores, as illustrated in
[0195] This latter arrangement is particularly suitable in facilitating fibre when one has S stacked 1N WSSs. Multicore fibres with a target inter-core crosstalk levels of 30 dB after 100 km are being developed.
[0196] Referring back to section 2.2 above, although embodiments of the switch may be limited in the number of discrete positions to which one can steer to due to restrictions imposed by p.sub.min and the limited number of pixels in a sub-hologram, n.sub.xn.sub.y, embodiments of the switch are nevertheless able to steer any given beam with great accuracy. For example, a sub-hologram with 6060 pixels, and 128 phase levels can steer with an accuracy of around 5 arc seconds. As a result, any fabrication errors associated with a multicore fibre may be compensated for by optimizing the sub-hologram phase patterns.
[0197] 3.5. Separation of Input Port from Zeroth Order
[0198] A potential disadvantage of the fibre schemes illustrated in
[0199] This zero order power may be used as a monitoring port. Alternatively, if the switch failed, it may be used as a protection express port as all channels would then be directed to this point.
[0200] 3.6. Wavefront Encoding Based on Common Filtering at the Objective Lens Input Plane
[0201] We have previously described a wavefront encoding technique to suppress crosstalk, in WO2012/123713. A development of this approach may be employed in the switch structure described here.
[0202] In particular a wavefront-modifying or filter element may be placed at the common input plane to the objective lenslet, that is at plane P.sub.o as shown in
[0203] 3.6.1. Wavefront Encoding Based on a Common Axicon
[0204] Crosstalk from a blazed grating occurs due to quantization of the displayed phase pattern, which can be further exacerbated by the edge effect. The edge effect in a LCOS SLM device is a result of pixel fringing fields (the electric field due to the voltage applied to a pixel leaking across to neighbouring pixels) and liquid crystal material effects, and causes errors in the displayed phase profile (we have described techniques to mitigate this in WO2012/110811). As described in WO2012/123713, we can suppress crosstalk using an Axicon phase structure. For the purposes of the present switch design, we use wavefront encoding based on an Axicon phase element as follows: [0205] An element with an Axicon phase profile, which is characterised by a variation in phase that is linear with respect to radius, is placed at the input objective plane. We denote this element as A.sub.1. [0206] This element may be a high resolution diffractive optical element, or refractive component. [0207] If the wavefront leaving the LCOS SLM is simply a plane wave with a certain propagation vector k(p,,), the output at the fibre plane will comprise a series of rings as opposed to Gaussian beams. [0208] By adding a counter Axicon phase profile to the grating phase profile we can compensate for the Axicon phase profile of A.sub.1. [0209] The signal beam will therefore be focused to a Gaussian beam profile. [0210] Higher and symmetric diffraction orders are focused to rings.
[0211] The approach here is that a ring focus may be engineered to miss the fibre core, thereby minimizing crosstalk as the centre of the ring will have minimal optical power. To illustrate this approach we show simulated replay fields in
[0215] In
[0216] 3.6.2. Wavefront Encoding Based on a Common Matched Spatial Filter
[0217] The element shown in
[0218] 3.6.3. Wavefront Encoding Based on Defocus
[0219] In a further approach one can suppress crosstalk by adding focal power to the sub-hologram and by realigning the optical planes such that only the +1 order is focused at the fibre plane. In this case no additional element need be used at the input plane of the objective lens as the objective lens itself is essentially the filter.
4. DESIGN OF A STACKED 1N WSS MODULE
[0220] Now referring back once again to
[0223] One can therefore implement S individual 18 WSSs using a common relay system (L.sub.1 and L.sub.2), a common DEMUX grating (P.sub.g), a single SLM, and an array of S objective lenses (L.sub.A) and a set of S (33) fibre arrays spaced along the y-axis of the system.
[0224] In terms of scalability, a 4K LCOS SLM based on sub-holograms of size 5050 pixels for a 50 GHz channel slot can support up to S=40 individual 1N WSSs, with N=8 for a square packed output array, and N=12 for a Hexagonally packed output array. These values for N assume a minimum average number of pixels per period of 7.5 pixels.
5. OPERATION OF MODULE AS AN NN WSS
[0225] The switch architecture we describe here involves a series of 1N and N1 WSSs in conjunction with a shuffle network. Referring back once again to
[0226] In operation: [0227] Four sets of wavelength channels enter the module (each set up wavelengths has a separate symbol, and the four wavelengths are differentiated by colour). [0228] Each set of wavelength channels enters via a separate 14 WSS. [0229] Each 14 switch routes wavelength channels to one of the four output fibres associated with it. [0230] On the output side, each 41 WSS has four input fibres and one output fibre. [0231] The four output fibres from any 14 switch are connected to a different 41 WSS on the output side. The resulting fibre interconnection pattern is commonly referred to as a perfect shuffle network. [0232] Each 41 WSSs combines its four inputs such that they exit the switch via the single output fibre. [0233] The output of the module therefore comprises four output fibres, with four sets of arbitrarily switched wavelength channels on each. [0234] Contention will occur if we attempt to route the same wavelength channel from two or more input fibres to the same output fibre.
[0235] To implement the shuffle portion of the architecture of
[0239] The module of
6. OPERATION OF MODULE AS A COLLECTION OF INDEPENDENT 1N AND NM WSSS
[0243] The flexibility of the stacked 1N WSS design also allows the implementation of a mixed scheme of switches. For example by reconfiguring the fibre array that takes data into and out of the switch module, and by reconfiguring the fibre connections between switches, embodiments of the switch module may be configured to implement one or more of the following, in embodiments simultaneously: [0244] One or more 1N WSSs. [0245] One or more N1 WSSs. [0246] One or more PQ WSSs, where PN, and QN. [0247] Any combination thereof (potentially simultaneously, as a collection of discrete devices).
[0248] Embodiments of a switch of the type we describe employing, for example, a 4K resolution LCOS SLM could potentially support, for example, up to forty individual 112 WSSs operating over the C-band, or a 1212 WSS, or a 1212 WSS and sixteen 112 or 121 WSSs.
SUMMARY
[0249] In some preferred implementations the switch use square (or rectangular) sub-holograms, preferably with three or more rows of sub-holograms, preferably steering the demultiplexed beams in two-dimensions, preferably arranging the output ports as a two-dimensional array. Thus some preferred implementations use a relay system based on spherical optics to simultaneously direct wavelength channels to square sub-holograms.
[0250] Preferably embodiments of the system use a single objective lenslet per 1N WSS. In some embodiments each array of output ports may be clustered behind a common telecentric lens array (in embodiments one lens/lenslet per port array). However in embodiments the optics need not be telecentric. Moreover a port array need not be a square (or rectangular) array and in embodiments a hexagonal array is employed to increase port count.
[0251] In embodiments optical separation between the output ports may be improved by employing either a magnification stage after the relay optics, more particularly after a virtual input/output plane in the system (optionally with a further lens/lenslet array); or by employing the objective lens/lenslet array in a non-telecentric configuration. Both these approaches help to mitigate crosstalk.
[0252] Steering in two dimensions is advantageous as the total pixel count of the square (or rectangular) sub-holograms may be relatively smaller than if steering in one dimension, and more output ports may be provided, for example 8 (N=8) in a square or rectangular array, or 12 (N=12) in a hexagonal array. Clustering the output fibres is advantageous in part because it facilitates the use of multi-core fibres to support the N output ports, which in turn simplifies fibre handling and switch interfacing.
[0253] When using a displayed grating for switching one consequence of using a square or hexagonally packed arrangement of output ports is that when determining a diffraction pattern to display attention need only be given to optimising the 1, +1 and 0.sup.th orders, which simplifies the sub-hologram. Moreover by offsetting the input fibre away from the centre of an array and/or by tilting the system (more specifically by tilting the SLM at an angle with respect to an axis of the input signals), in particular such that the 0.sup.th order is launched into the central output fibre (which may then be unused), one can substantially maintain port count whilst reducing the optimisation to primarily the 1 and +1 orders. This helps to reduce the need for optical isolation on the input ports to inhibit back reflection.
[0254] Optionally a staggered output fibre array may also be employed to suppress crosstalk. In embodiments this may involve longitudinally offsetting some of the N output fibres in a direction parallel to the axis of the optical fibres.
[0255] Embodiments of the systems we describe may also use wavefront encoding based on defocus to suppress residual crosstalk and/or may employ wavefront encoding using a common (spatial) filter at the objective lenslet input plane to suppress residual crosstalk.
[0256] In principle the designs we have described, both in the summary of the invention section and in the detailed description, may be extended from a 1N WSS to an MN WSS, that is where each unit (array) has multiple inputs and outputs.
[0257] No doubt many other effective alternatives will occur to the skilled person. It will be understood that the invention is not limited to the described embodiments and encompasses modifications apparent to those skilled in the art lying within the spirit and scope of the claims appended hereto.