ANTIOXIDANT FOR ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE OF FUEL CELLS AND METHOD FOR PREPARING THE SAME

Abstract

Disclosed is an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells. The antioxidant may include a support including silicon dioxide and having a nanotube shape, and a metal oxide supported on the support.

Claims

1. An antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells comprising: a support comprising silicon dioxide and formed in a nanotube shape; and a metal oxide comprising a metal component and supported on the support.

2. The antioxidant of claim 1, wherein a surface of the support is modified with a silicon compound comprising one or more amine groups, and the metal oxide is supported on the surface of the support.

3. The antioxidant of claim 2, wherein the silicon compound comprises 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane.

4. The antioxidant of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide is supported on the support by disposing one or more chelate compounds on the surface of the support, wherein the chelate compound is formed by a coordinate bond between a metal ion of the metal oxide and the silicon compound having two or more amine groups.

5. The antioxidant of claim 4, wherein the silicon compound comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine, and N-{3-[dimethoxy(methyl) silyl]propyl}-1,2-ethanediamine.

6. The antioxidant of claim 1, wherein the metal oxide comprises one or more selected from pure cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2) and modified cerium oxide.

7. The antioxidant of claim 6, wherein the modified cerium oxide comprises one or more selected from cerium-zirconium oxide (Ce.sub.1-xZr.sub.xO.sub.2, in which x is 0.2 to 0.8), cerium-manganese oxide (Ce.sub.1-xMn.sub.xO.sub.2, in which x is 0.2 to 0.8), cerium oxide-doped yttrium oxide, and cerium oxide-doped zirconium oxide.

8. The antioxidant of claim 1, wherein the support has a length of about 10 nm to 700 nm.

9. The antioxidant of claim 1, wherein the antioxidant comprises the metal oxide in an amount of about 0.1% by weight to 30% by weight, based on the total weight of the antioxidant.

10. An electrolyte membrane for fuel cells comprising: an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells of claim 1; and an ionomer.

11. The electrolyte membrane of claim 10, wherein a content of the metal oxide present is an amount of about 0.01% by weight to 5% by weight, based on the total weight of the ionomer.

12. A method for preparing an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells comprising: a) forming a support in a nanotube shape from a silicon dioxide precursor; and b) supporting a metal oxide comprising a metal component on the support.

13. The method of claim 12, wherein the silicon dioxide precursor comprises tetraethyl orthosilicate.

14. The method of claim 12, further comprising: modifying a surface of the support by adding a silicon compound comprising one or more amine groups to the support formed in the step a) before step b).

15. The method of claim 14, wherein the silicon compound comprises 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane.

16. The method according to claim 12, further comprising: before step b), preparing a chelate compound by forming a coordinate bond between the metal component of the metal oxide and a silicon compound comprising two or more amine groups; and disposing the chelate compound on a surface of the support.

17. The method of claim 16, wherein the silicon compound comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine, and N-{3-[dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]propyl }-1,2-ethanediamine.

18. The method of claim 12, wherein a precursor of the metal oxide comprises one or more selected from the group consisting of cerium nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O), cerium carbonate (Ce(CO.sub.3).sub.3.xH.sub.2O (in which x is 7 to 8), cerium trichloride (CeCl.sub.3), cerium (IV) sulfate (Ce(SO.sub.4).sub.2), and cerium acetate (Ce(CH.sub.3COO).sub.3.H.sub.2O).

19. A fuel cell comprising an antioxidant of claim 1.

20. A vehicle comprising a fuel cell of claim 19.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] The above and other features of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to certain exemplary embodiments thereof illustrated in the accompanying drawings which are given hereinbelow by way of illustration only, and thus are not limitative of the present invention, and wherein:

[0036] FIG. 1 shows an exemplary cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2) nanotube structure and a radical (.OH) scavenging mechanism according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0037] FIG. 2 is a flowchart illustrating an exemplary method for preparing an exemplary cerium oxide supported on an exemplary silicon dioxide nanotube according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0038] FIG. 3 is a flowchart showing an exemplary method for preparing cerium oxide supported on an exemplary silicon dioxide nanotube according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0039] FIG. 4 shows an exemplary cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide nanotube structure in Examples 2 to 6 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0040] FIG. 5A shows an exemplary cerium migration test process of an exemplary antioxidant including an exemplary cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide nanotube according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0041] FIG. 5B is a plan view illustrating an exemplary product according to the cerium migration test process shown in FIG. 5A;

[0042] FIG. 6A shows a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of an antioxidant in Comparative Example 1;

[0043] FIG. 6B shows a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image of the antioxidant in Comparative Example 1;

[0044] FIGS. 6C and 6D are energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of the antioxidant in Comparative Example 1;

[0045] FIG. 7A is a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0046] FIG. 7B is a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0047] FIGS. 7C and 7D are energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 2 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0048] FIG. 8A is a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of exemplary antioxidants in Examples 3 to 5 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0049] FIG. 8B is a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image of exemplary antioxidants in Examples 3 to 5 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0050] FIGS. 8C and 8D are energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of exemplary antioxidants in Examples 3 to 5 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0051] FIG. 9A is a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 6 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;

[0052] FIG. 9B is a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 6 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention; and

[0053] FIGS. 9C and 9D are energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of an exemplary antioxidant in Example 6 according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0054] Hereinafter, preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the annexed drawings. Advantages and features of the present invention and methods for accomplishing the same will be clearly understood from the following preferred embodiments with reference to the annexed drawings. However, the present invention is not limited to the embodiments and will be embodied in different forms. The embodiments are suggested only to offer thorough and complete understanding of the disclosed contents and to sufficiently inform those skilled in the art of the technical concept of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is defined only by claims. Like reference numbers refer to like elements throughout the description of the figures.

[0055] Unless differently defined, all terms used herein (including technical and scientific terms) have the same meanings as generally understood by those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains. In addition, terms identical to those defined in generally used dictionaries should be interpreted as having meanings identical to contextual meanings of the related art, and are not interpreted as having ideal or excessively formal meanings unless they are clearly and particularly defined in the present specification.

[0056] In addition, terms herein used are provided only for illustration of embodiments and should not be construed as limiting the scope of the present invention. Singular forms are intended to include plural forms as well, unless context clearly indicates otherwise. It will be further understood that the terms comprises, includes and the like, when used in this specification, specify the presence of stated elements, features, numbers, steps and/or operations, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other elements, features, numbers, steps and/or operations. In addition, and/or includes each of the mentioned items and a combination of one or more thereof.

[0057] In addition, it will be understood that when an element such as a layer, film, region or substrate is referred to as being on another element, it can be directly on the other element or an intervening element may also be present. It will also be understood that, when an element such as a layer, film, region or substrate is referred to as being under another element, it can be directly under the other element or an intervening element may also be present.

[0058] Unless context clearly indicates otherwise, all numbers, figures and/or expressions that represent ingredients, reaction conditions, polymer compositions and amounts of mixtures used in the specification are approximations that reflect various uncertainties of measurement occurring inherently in obtaining these figures among other things. For this reason, it should be understood that, in all cases, the term about should modify all the numbers, figures and/or expressions.

[0059] For example, unless specifically stated or obvious from context, as used herein, the term about is understood as within a range of normal tolerance in the art, for example within 2 standard deviations of the mean. About can be understood as within 10%, 9%, 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.1%, 0.05%, or 0.01% of the stated value. Unless otherwise clear from the context, all numerical values provided herein are modified by the term about.

[0060] In addition, when numerical ranges are disclosed in the description, these ranges are continuous and include all numbers from the minimum to the maximum including the maximum within the ranges unless otherwise defined. Furthermore, when the range is referred to as an integer, it includes all integers from the minimum to the maximum including the maximum within the range, unless otherwise defined.

[0061] It should be understood that, in the specification, when the range is referred to regarding a parameter, the parameter encompasses all figures including end points disclosed within the range. For example, the range of 5 to 10 includes figures of 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10, as well as arbitrary sub-ranges such as ranges of 6 to 10, 7 to 10, 6 to 9, and 7 to 9, and any figures, such as 5.5, 6.5, 7.5, 5.5 to 8.5 and 6.5 to 9, between appropriate integers that fall within the range. In addition, for example, the range of 10% to 30% encompasses all integers that include numbers such as 10%, 11%, 12% and 13% as well as 30%, and any sub-ranges of 10% to 15%, 12% to 18%, or 20% to 30%, as well as any numbers, such as 10.5%, 15.5% and 25.5%, between appropriate integers that fall within the range.

[0062] It is understood that the term vehicle or vehicular or other similar term as used herein is inclusive of motor vehicles in general such as passenger automobiles including sports utility vehicles (SUV), buses, trucks, various commercial vehicles, watercraft including a variety of boats and ships, aircraft, and the like, and includes hybrid vehicles, electric vehicles, plug-in hybrid electric vehicles, hydrogen-powered vehicles and other alternative fuel vehicles (e.g. fuels derived from resources other than petroleum). As referred to herein, a hybrid vehicle is a vehicle that has two or more sources of power, for example both gasoline-powered and electric-powered vehicles.

[0063] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to the annexed drawings.

[0064] In one aspect, provided is an antioxidant of the electrolyte membrane for fuel cells that may include metal oxide, for example, cerium oxide. Cerium oxide may suitably include pure cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2) and modified cerium oxide (modified CeO.sub.2). The modified cerium oxide may suitably include cerium-zirconium oxide (Ce.sub.1-xZr.sub.xO.sub.2, x=0.20.8) and cerium-manganese oxide (Ce.sub.1-xMn.sub.xO.sub.2, x=0.20.8). For example, the modified cerium oxide may be a mixture of cerium-zirconium oxide (Ce.sub.1-xZr.sub.xO.sub.2, x=0.20.8) and cerium-manganese oxide (Ce.sub.1-xMn.sub.xO.sub.2, x=0.20.8).

[0065] For instance, the antioxidant may suitably include pure cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2) supported on a support, but the present invention is not limited thereto. In addition, the term antioxidant mentioned herein refers to a primary antioxidant.

[0066] FIG. 1 shows a cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2) nanotube structure and a radical (.OH) scavenging mechanism according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention.

[0067] Preferably, the antioxidant may include a support including chemically stable silicon dioxide and metal oxide supported on the support. For example, as shown in FIG. 1, cerium oxide 2 supported on a silicon dioxide (SiO.sub.2) nanotube 3 may constitute an antioxidant, which may be incorporated into an electrolyte membrane based on an ionomer 10 (for example, a perfluorinated sulfonic acid-based ionomer). In such an antioxidant, cerium oxide 2 may prevent oxidation of the electrolyte membrane by scavenging radicals, while retaining a well-dispersed morphology with a small crystallite size.

[0068] Cerium oxide, which is used as a common antioxidant to improve chemical durability of electrolyte membranes, may have problems in that, when excessively added, cerium oxide forms an ionic bond with a sulfur trioxide anion (SO.sub.3.sup.) of a sulfonic acid group positioned at an ionomer end group in the electrolyte membrane, thereby causing deterioration in proton conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. However, when cerium oxide is supported on a nanotube-type silicon dioxide support, deterioration in proton conductivity may be suppressed, because the silicon dioxide constituting the support may be chemically hydrophilic and the nanotube-type structure may provide high water scavenging or absorbance activity. Accordingly, deterioration in proton conductivity due to cerium oxide used as an antioxidant may be suppressed and high proton conductivity may thus be maintained.

[0069] In addition, in the related arts, mutual agglomeration may occur in cerium oxide particles with excellent antioxidant activity through nanometer (nm) or several tens of nanometer-scale van der Waals force. However, when supporting cerium oxide on a support, a wide surface area may be imparted to the cerium oxide by uniformly distributing the cerium oxide. Accordingly, antioxidant activity may be further improved. The support used to support metal oxide may be structurally stable and has chemical durability and thermal durability even in the presence of a strong acid and heat.

[0070] Additionally, in the related art, when cerium oxide produced to have a wide surface area, rather than supporting on a support, is injected into an electrolyte membrane, cerium oxide may be discharged into the outside of the electrolyte membrane due to dissolution and migration, which may cause deterioration in durability of the electrolyte membrane.

[0071] To the contrary, when cerium oxide, which is grown from a cerium precursor and is supported on a silicon dioxide nanotube, is provided, cerium oxide and silicon dioxide may be bonded in the form of SiOCe. Since silicon dioxide is an oxide that has considerably low solubility even under strong acidic conditions, dissolution and migration of cerium oxide may be suppressed due to a chemical bond such as a SiOCe bond.

[0072] Consequently, by using the antioxidant according to various exemplary embodiments of the present invention, an electrolyte membrane with high durability and high proton conductivity may be provided, while avoiding agglomeration of cerium oxide.

[0073] Hereinafter, a method for preparing cerium oxide supported on a silicon dioxide nanotube will be described with reference to FIGS. 2 and 3. FIG. 2 is a flowchart schematically illustrating a method for preparing cerium oxide supported on a silicon dioxide nanotube according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a flowchart schematically illustrating an exemplary method for preparing cerium oxide supported on an exemplary silicon dioxide nanotube according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.

[0074] As described above, in order for an antioxidant to function well in an electrolyte membrane, it is important for cerium oxide with a uniform size to be uniformly distributed on the surface of silicon dioxide. When the bonding strength between cerium oxide and silicon dioxide is deteriorated in the preparation process, detachment or segregation between the two substances readily may occur, which cerium oxide may not be supported sufficiently. Accordingly, agglomeration between cerium oxide may occur, which results in deterioration in antioxidant functions and acceleration of chemical degradation of the electrolyte membrane in a local area where the antioxidant is absent. As a result, in order to expect high durability of the electrolyte membranes, cerium oxide may be bonded well to silicon dioxide as the support and its support state may be maintained well under electrolyte membrane preparation and fuel cell operation environments.

[0075] FIGS. 2 and 3 show the most distinguishing feature of the method for preparing an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention. For instance, the method may include a) producing or forming a support having a nanotube shape from a silicon dioxide precursor and b) supporting metal oxide on the support. Preferably, the metal oxide may include a metal component, which may suitably include a metal ion or covalently bonded metal atom.

[0076] The method for preparing an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells a may further include, before step b), modifying the surface of the support by adding a silicon compound having one or more amine groups thereto (pre-modification of silicon dioxide surface). An exemplary preparation method is described below.

[0077] Preparation Method of Example 1

[0078] {circle around (1)} 8.5 g of Brij 58 (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) as a surfactant is dissolved in 15 ml of cyclohexane (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) as a solvent at 50 C. to form an inverse micelle structure.

[0079] {circle around (2)} 1.3 ml of a solution of 0.8M nickel chloride (NiCl.sub.2) in deionized water is added to the mixture solution obtained in step {circle around (1)}, followed by stirring until a homogenous state is obtained (S10).

[0080] {circle around (3)} 0.45 ml of hydrazine hydrate is added dropwise to the mixture solution obtained in step {circle around (2)} under stirring (S12).

[0081] {circle around (4)} 1 ml of diethylamine is added to the mixture solution prepared in step {circle around (3)} and tetraethyl orthosilicate as a silicon dioxide precursor is added thereto to grow silicon dioxide nanotubes (S14).

[0082] {circle around (5)} The precipitate is separated using a centrifuge and the solvent present on the precipitate is washed out with alcohol, and nickel and hydrazine are then washed with an acid (S16).

[0083] {circle around (6)} In order to remove the acidic ingredient from the silicon dioxide nanotubes of the precipitate obtained in step {circle around (5)}, the precipitate is washed with deionized water five times and then dried (S18).

[0084] {circle around (7)} The silicon dioxide nanotubes are dispersed in a mixed solvent consisting of 50 ml of ethanol and 3 ml of ammonium hydroxide (S20).

[0085] {circle around (8)} The silicon dioxide nanotubes are reacted with 2.5 mL of 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) for 24 hours to modify the silicon dioxide nanotube surface (S22).

[0086] {circle around (9)} The reaction solution obtained in step {circle around (8)} is reacted with a solution (1 g/5 ml) of aqueous urea in deionized water at 85 C. for 15 minutes (S24).

[0087] {circle around (10)} A solution of 0.1 g cerium nitrate hexahydrate in 1 ml of distilled water is added dropwise to the mixture dispersion obtained in step {circle around (9)}, followed by proceeding reaction at 85 C. for 12 hours (S26).

[0088] {circle around (11)} The mixture solution prepared in step {circle around (10)} is centrifuged to obtain a cerium-based antioxidant supported on solid-phase silicon dioxide nanotube particles (S28).

[0089] {circle around (12)} The supported cerium-based antioxidant is washed with deionized water several times and then dried to obtain a final cerium-based antioxidant sample supported on silicon dioxide nanotube particles (S30).

[0090] In the preparation method of Example 1, the silicon dioxide support may be surface-modified with ammonium hydroxide and 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane as a compound having one or more amine groups, and cerium may be then supported on the silicon dioxide support through a cerium salt.

[0091] For instance, 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane is a silicon compound having a molecular formula of C.sub.9H.sub.23N.sub.1O.sub.3Si (molecular weight: 221.37 g/mol), which has a structure represented by the following Formula 1.

##STR00001##

[0092] As shown in FIG. 3, the method may further include: before step b), forming a coordinate bond between a metal component (e.g., metal ion) of the metal oxide and a silicon compound having two or more amine groups to prepare a chelate compound. In addition, the method may further include disposing the chelate compound on the surface of the support (pre-preparation and mixing of nanotube-type cerium chelate for supporting cerium oxide). Preferably, silicon dioxide nanotubes may be produced, and cerium oxide may be then supported on the silicon dioxide nanotubes, as the chelate compound of the metal ion (for example, cerium ion) and the substance having two or more amine groups. An exemplary preparation method will be given below.

[0093] Preparation Methods of Examples 2 to 6

[0094] {circle around (1)} 8.5 g of Brij 58 (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) as a surfactant is dissolved in 15 ml of cyclohexane (Sigma Aldrich Co., USA) as a solvent at 50 C. to form an inverse micelle structure.

[0095] {circle around (2)} 1.3 ml (Examples 2 to 5) or 1.9 ml (Example 6) of a solution of 0.8M nickel chloride (NiCl.sub.2) in deionized water is added to the mixture solution obtained in step {circle around (1)}, followed by stirring until a homogenous state is obtained (S100).

[0096] {circle around (3)} 0.45 ml of hydrazine hydrate is added dropwise to the mixture solution obtained in step {circle around (2)} under stirring (S120).

[0097] {circle around (4)} 1 ml of diethylamine is added to the mixture solution prepared in step {circle around (3)} and tetraethyl orthosilicate as a silicon dioxide precursor is added thereto to grow silicon dioxide nanotubes (S140).

[0098] {circle around (5)} The precipitate is separated using a centrifuge and the solvent present on the precipitate is washed out with alcohol, and nickel and hydrazine are washed with an acid (S160).

[0099] {circle around (6)} In order to remove the acidic ingredient from the silicon dioxide nanotubes of the precipitate obtained in step {circle around (5)}, the precipitate is washed with deionized water five times and then dried (S180).

[0100] {circle around (7)} The silicon dioxide nanotubes are dispersed in a mixed solvent consisting of 50 ml of ethanol and 3 ml of ammonium hydroxide (S200).

[0101] {circle around (8)} The reaction solution obtained in step {circle around (7)} is reacted with a solution (1 g/5 ml) of aqueous urea in deionized water at 85 C. for 15 minutes (S240).

[0102] {circle around (9)} A solution of 0.1 g (Examples 2 and 6) or 0.5 g (Examples 3 to 5) of cerium nitrate hexahydrate in 2 ml of N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine is added dropwise to the dispersion obtained in step {circle around (8)}, followed by proceeding reaction at 85 C. for 12 hours (S270).

[0103] {circle around (10)} The mixture solution prepared in step {circle around (9)} is centrifuged to obtain a cerium-based antioxidant supported on solid-phase silicon dioxide nanotube particles (S280).

[0104] {circle around (11)} The supported cerium-based antioxidant is washed with deionized water several times and then dried to obtain a final cerium-based antioxidant sample supported on silicon dioxide nanotube particles (S300).

[0105] The preparation methods of Examples 2 to 6 may improve bonding strength (SiOCe bonding property) between cerium oxide and silicon dioxide by using N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine and thus enable cerium oxide to be supported uniformly and efficiently. N[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine is a silicon compound having a molecular formula of C.sub.8H.sub.22N.sub.2O.sub.3Si (molecular weight: 222.4 g/mol), which has a structure represented by the following Formula 2.

##STR00002##

[0106] When cerium nitrate hexahydrate used as a precursor of cerium is stirred with N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl] ethylene diamine, a cerium ion may be coordinately bonded with two amines (NH, NH.sub.2) to form a chelate compound, which enables cerium to maintain its stable form. Subsequently, silicon (Si) is adsorbed on the surface of silicon dioxide that has the same property, and impurities are washed out with an aqueous element, which forms strong bonding strength between cerium oxide and silicon dioxide

[0107] Meanwhile, the particle size of silicon dioxide may be considered important in the process of incorporating cerium oxide supported on silicon dioxide nanotubes into an electrolyte membrane. The silicon dioxide nanotubes serving as the support preferably may have a length of about 10 nm to 700 nm, or particularly of about 20 nm to 300 nm. When the length of silicon dioxide nanotubes is less than about 10 nm, the nanotubes may lose their inherent structural properties and water scavenging or absorbance activity When the length of nanotubes is greater than about 700 nm, i nanotubes may not be uniformly dispersed in the electrolyte membrane due to excessively large size.

[0108] The amount of cerium oxide supported may be considered important in order to obtain an antioxidant with excellent required properties. The amount of cerium oxide supported may be of about 0.1% by weight to 30% by weight, or particularly of about 0.5% by weight to 20% by weight, based on the total weight of the antioxidant, which is the sum of contents of the support and metal oxide). When the amount of cerium oxide supported is less than about 0.1% by weight, the frequency that hydrophilic silicon dioxide nanotubes capable of scavenging or absorbing water contacts water may be increased, which subsequently may include the proton conductivity of the electrolyte membrane. Accordingly, agglomeration of cerium oxide may be decreased, but antioxidant activity may not be sufficiently obtained, swelling of the electrolyte membrane may be excessively increased and the mechanical strength of electrolyte membrane may be deteriorated. When the amount of cerium oxide supported is greater than about 30% by weight, antioxidant activity may be sufficiently obtained, and deterioration in mechanical strength due to swelling of the electrolyte membrane may be decreased. However, the proton conductivity of the electrolyte membrane may be deteriorated and unnecessary movement by heat may be serious due to agglomeration of cerium oxide, thereby deteriorating stability of cerium oxide.

[0109] The content of cerium oxide supported on the support may also be considered important in order to obtain the antioxidant activity of fuel cell electrolyte membranes. Based on the total weight of ionomer used to manufacture an electrolyte membrane, the content of cerium oxide may be of about 0.01% by weight to 5% by weight, or particularly about 0.08% by weight to 1% by weight based on the total weight of the antioxidant. When the content of cerium oxide is less than about 0.01% by weight, the antioxidant effect may be insufficient. When the content of cerium oxide is greater than about 5% by weight, the proton conductivity of the electrolyte membrane may be deteriorated.

[0110] In addition, heat treatment temperature of the antioxidant may be considered important for crystal growth of cerium oxide. For instance, the heat treatment temperature is of about 100 C. to 1000 C., or particularly of about 200 C. to 600 C., to improve durability by increasing the crystal size of cerium oxide of the antioxidant. When the heat treatment temperature is less than about 100 C., durability may not be improved due to insufficient crystal growth of cerium oxide. When the heat treatment temperature is greater than about 1000 C., antioxidant activity may be greatly decreased due to excessively large crystal size of cerium oxide.

[0111] A method for preparing an antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells according to various exemplary embodiments (for example, Examples 2 to 6) will be described hereinafter. FIG. 4 shows a cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide nanotube structure according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention. For example, cerium oxide 2 undergoing crystal growth 22 is supported on a silicon dioxide support 3 (that is, silicon dioxide nanotube) produced from tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) using N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine and cerium nitrate hexahydrate as a cerium precursor. Preferably, the cerium oxide 2 may be uniformly supported and the amount of cerium oxide 2 supported may be controlled by controlling contents of N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine and cerium nitrate hexahydrate.

[0112] The cerium precursor may suitably include N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine having two amine groups and cerium nitrate hexahydrate but the present invention is not limited thereto. For example, instead of N-[3-(trimethoxysilyl)propyl]ethylene diamine, the cerium precursor may suitably include N-{3-[dimethoxy(methyl)silyl]propyl}-1,2-ethanediamine including two or more amine groups and silicate and having a molecular weight of 206.3 g/mol. In addition, the cerium precursor may suitably include cerium carbonate (Ce(CO.sub.3).sub.3.xH.sub.2O (in which x is 7 to 8), cerium trichloride (CeCl.sub.3), cerium (IV) sulfate (Ce(SO.sub.4).sub.2), and cerium acetate (Ce(CH.sub.3COO).sub.3.H.sub.2O).

[0113] A stability test method of the antioxidant for an electrolyte membrane of fuel cells according to exemplary embodiments of the present invention will be described. FIG. 5A shows an exemplary cerium migration test process of an exemplary antioxidant including an exemplary cerium oxide-supported silicon dioxide nanotube. FIG. 5B shows a plan view illustrating a sample produced according to the cerium migration test process shown in FIG. 5A.

[0114] FIG. 5A provides a migration test method using heat to evaluate the stability of the cerium oxide antioxidant supported on a silicon dioxide nanotube. For instance, the electrolyte membrane may be produced to a size of 3 cm3 cm and a cerium-free membrane 110 may be produced such that it excludes cerium oxide. The temperature and pressure for joining may be 120 C. and 0.1 kgf /cm.sup.2, respectively, and pressing may be carried out for 2 minutes using a hot press 150 for uniformly applying a pressure to the entire area.

[0115] The content of cerium moved by heat is measured by X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and then compared with Ce g/[cm.sup.2.Math.cm] (cerium weight/unit area.Math.unit thickness). In addition, the content of cerium moved by heat is calculated in accordance with the following equation by measuring the amount of cerium moved from an electrolyte membrane 100 including cerium oxide to a cerium-free membrane 100 (or cerium-free target electrolyte membrane) after hot pressing test.

[00001]$\mathrm{Weight}.Math..Math.\mathrm{of}.Math..Math.\mathrm{cerium}.Math..Math.\mathrm{moved}.Math..Math.\mathrm{into}.Math..Math.\mathrm{electrolyte}.Math..Math.\mathrm{membrane}.Math..Math.\left(\mathrm{wt}.Math..Math.\%\right)=\frac{\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Amount}.Math..Math.\mathrm{of}.Math..Math.\mathrm{cerium}.Math..Math.\mathrm{in}.Math..Math.\mathrm{target}.Math.\\ \mathrm{electrolyte}.Math..Math.\mathrm{membrane}.Math..Math.\mathrm{after}.Math..Math.\mathrm{hot}.Math..Math.\mathrm{pressing}.Math..Math.\mathrm{test}\end{array}.Math.}{.Math.\begin{array}{c}\mathrm{Amount}.Math..Math.\mathrm{of}.Math..Math.\mathrm{cerium}.Math..Math.\mathrm{in}.Math..Math.\mathrm{electrolyte}.Math..Math.\mathrm{membrane}.Math.\\ \mathrm{containing}.Math..Math.\mathrm{cerium}.Math..Math.\mathrm{oxide}.Math..Math.\mathrm{before}.Math..Math.\mathrm{hot}.Math..Math.\mathrm{pressing}.Math..Math.\mathrm{test}\end{array}}$

EXAMPLE

[0116] Hereinafter, the present invention will be described in more detail with reference to specific examples and test examples. These examples and test examples are provided only for illustration of the present invention and should be not construed as limiting the scope of the present invention.

[0117] All supports were produced in the form of a silicon dioxide nano-sphere or nanotube using tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) as a silicon dioxide precursor. Then, cerium oxide was supported on silicon dioxide using cerium nitrate hexahydrate (Ce(NO.sub.3).sub.3.6H.sub.2O) as a cerium precursor.

[0118] First, regarding conditions of examples and comparative examples of the present invention, as an ionomer for electrolyte membranes, a perfluorinated sulfonic acid-based ionomer (equivalent weight=725 g/SO.sub.3H, 3M Co., USA) was used and the weight rate (=antioxidant content (g)/[ionomer content (g)+antioxidant content (g)]100) of the antioxidant added to the electrolyte membrane (including the ionomer and the antioxidant) was set to 0.08% by weight (0.1% by weight, based on cerium oxide).

[0119] In addition, in order to uniformly disperse the antioxidant in the electrolyte membrane, the ingredients were mixed using a stirring bar for 12 hours. For improved dispersion, a physical dispersion method such as a surfactant and bead milling may be used. The antioxidant and ionomer dispersed well in a deionized water/ethanol mix solution were produced into a non-reinforced membrane by ionomer dispersion casting, dried at a temperature of 80 C. and then annealed at a temperature of 160 C.

COMPARATIVE EXAMPLE

Comparative Examples 1 and 2

[0120] Cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2) supported on the surface of a silicon dioxide nano-sphere support was produced. The silicon dioxide support had a nano-spherical shape and a diameter of about 50 nm.

EXAMPLE

[0121] In the production of supports according to examples, regarding the particle size of silicon dioxide, lengths of nanotubes of all examples were adjusted to 50 nm to 150 nm by controlling the contents of nickel chloride, and tests were conducted.

[0122] Regarding the amount of cerium oxide supported on silicon dioxide nanotubes, the amount of cerium oxide was controlled to 1.3% by weight to 9.3% by weight, based on the total content of antioxidant (Examples 2 to 6).

[0123] The amount of cerium oxide supported on the silicon dioxide nanotube support was within the range of 0.100 to 0.394% by weight, based on the total weight of ionomers used to manufacture an electrolyte membrane (Examples 2 to 6).

Example 1

[0124] Cerium oxide (CeO2/SiO2) supported on the surface of a silicon dioxide nanotube support was produced. The silicon dioxide support had a nanotube shape and a length of about 50 nm.

Example 2

[0125] Cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2) supported on the surface of a silicon dioxide nanotube support was produced. The silicon dioxide support had a nanotube shape and a length of about 50 nm. In addition, good support morphology was observed.

Examples 3 to 5

[0126] Cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2) supported on the surface of a silicon dioxide nanotube support was produced. The silicon dioxide support had a nanotube shape and a length of about 50 nm. In addition, good support morphology was observed. In addition, the amount of cerium oxide supported was greater than that of Example 2 or 6.

Example 6

[0127] Cerium oxide (CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2) supported on the surface of a silicon dioxide nanotube support was produced. The silicon dioxide support had a nanotube shape and a length of about 150 nm. In addition, good support morphology was observed.

[0128] Meanwhile, ingredients and contents used for Comparative Examples 1 and 2, and Examples 1 to 6 are shown in Table 1 below.

TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 Supported amount measured Name Type of Preparation by EDS of sample antioxidant Shape of SiO.sub.2 process (wt %) Comparative CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 Nanosphere Conventional 4.6 Examples (diameter 50 nm) 1 and 2 Example 1 CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 Nanotube Novel (length 50 nm) Example 2 CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 Nanotube Novel 1.3 (length 50 nm) Examples CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 Nanotube Novel 9.3 3 to 5 (length 50 nm) Example 6 CeO.sub.2/SiO.sub.2 Nanotube Novel 1.8 (length 150 nm)

[0129] Evaluation and Analysis

[0130] Hereinafter, support characteristics of cerium oxide depending on the microstructure changes of silicon dioxide supports were compared.

[0131] First, regarding test conditions of image analysis, a transmission electron microscope (TEM) (Talos200X FEI, USA) was used. In addition, support characteristics and crystal size of cerium oxide were analyzed by built-in element analysis (energy dispersive X-ray spectroscope, EDS) and high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis. In addition, X-ray fluorescence (XRF, EDX-LE Shimadzu, Japan) was also conducted to verify the amount of cerium oxide supported.

[0132] Meanwhile, regarding test conditions of proton conductivity and fluoride emission rate, fluoride emission rate was calculated after measuring the weight of an electrolyte membrane sample dried in an oven at a temperature of 80 C. for 6 hours or longer, and allowing the electrolyte membrane sample to stand under Fenton test conditions (2% by weight of hydrogen peroxide, deionized water and 3 ppm of Fe.sup.2+) at a temperature of 80 C. for 120 hours. The proton conductivity of the electrolyte membrane was measured under the conditions of a temperature of 65 C. and relative humidity of 50% using an impedance analyzer (Solartron 1260, Solartron Analytical Co., UK) and an interface (Solartron 1287, Solartron Analytical Co., UK).

[0133] Regarding respective comparative examples and examples, support characteristics and crystal size of cerium oxide were analyzed through analysis images shown in FIGS. 6 to 9. FIG. 6 shows the morphology of Comparative Example 1 produced in the form of silicon dioxide nanospheres. FIGS. 7 to 9 show morphologies of Examples 2 to 6 produced in the form of nanotubes.

[0134] In addition, non-reinforced electrolyte membranes with a thickness of 151 m were produced from a neat cerium oxide antioxidant, and cerium oxide antioxidant samples of nanosphere-type Comparative Example 1 and nanotube-type Examples 2 to 6, and fluoride emission rate (FER), proton conductivity and migration stability test results (for comparison of migration) of the electrolyte membranes were measured to compare characteristics of the electrolyte membranes. Results are shown in Table 2.

TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 Items Fluoride Supported Content Weight emission Proton amount of cerium of cerium rate conductivity measured oxide moved (FER) of of by based on by hot electrolyte electrolyte Shape Preparation EDS ionomer pressing membrane membrane Antioxidant of SiO.sub.2 process [wt %] [wt %] [wt %] [mol/(hr .Math. g)] [mS/cm] Comparative 15.6 32.9 Example (Neat) Comparative CeO.sub.2/ Nanosphere Conventional 4.6 0.100 45.3 8.1 31.9 Example 1 SiO.sub.2 (50 nm) Example 2 CeO.sub.2/ Nanotube Novel 1.3 0.100 38.6 7.2 46.4 SiO.sub.2 (50 nm) Example 3 CeO.sub.2/ Nanotube novel 9.3 0.100 37.9 6.8 36.2 SiO.sub.2 (50 m) Example 4 CeO.sub.2/ Nanotube Novel 9.3 0.185 39.9 5.8 38.2 SiO.sub.2 (50 nm) Example 5 CeO.sub.2/ Nanotube Novel 9.3 0.394 40.6 3.8 39.2 SiO.sub.2 (50 nm) Example 6 CeO.sub.2/ Nanotube Novel 1.8 0.106 41.9 7.9 49.9 SiO.sub.2 (150 nm)

Comparative Example 1

[0135] FIGS. 6A and 6B show a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image, respectively, of Comparative Example 1. FIGS. 6C and 6D show energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of Comparative Example 1.

[0136] Meanwhile, Comparative Example 1, in which cerium oxide was supported on nano-spherical silicon dioxide, showed improved chemical durability of the electrolyte membrane due to considerably decreased fluoride emission rate, but reduction in proton conductivity, as compared to the neat cerium antioxidant.

Example 2

[0137] FIGS. 7A and 7B show a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image, respectively, of Example 2. FIGS. 7C and 7D show energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of Example 2.

Examples 3 to 5

[0138] FIGS. 8A and 8B show a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image, respectively, of Examples 3 to 5. FIGS. 8C and 8D show energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of Examples 3 to 5.

Example 6

[0139] FIGS. 9A and 9B show a transmission electron microscopy (TEM) image and a high-angle annular dark field (HAADF) analysis image, respectively, of Example 6 FIGS. 9C and 9D show energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) images illustrating cerium (Ce) support characteristics and silicon (Si) support characteristics, respectively, of Example 6.

[0140] Meanwhile, Examples 2 to 6, in which cerium oxide was supported on nano-tubular silicon dioxide, showed improved chemical durability (dissolution stability) and proton conductivity of electrolyte membranes due to considerably decreased fluoride emission rate, but slight deterioration in proton conductivity, as compared to the neat cerium antioxidant and Comparative Example 1. At the same time, regarding migration, Examples 2 to 6 had less amounts of moved cerium in cerium oxide, as compared to Comparative Example 1. As such, as shown by movement after dissolution, which is a movement mechanism of cerium oxide, Examples 2 to 6 had excellent dissolution stability (resistance to dissolution).

[0141] Accordingly, when the antioxidant including cerium oxide is supported on silicon dioxide nanotubes, the cerium oxide antioxidant may be uniformly distributed over the silicon dioxide support, and thus may have high antioxidant activity, and the nanotube shape of hydrophilic silicon dioxide support may scavenge or absorb water well, thus increasing (not decreasing) proton conductivity. Accordingly, when the antioxidant including cerium oxide supported on silicon dioxide nanotubes is used for an electrolyte membrane, improved durability and increased proton conductivity may be imparted to the electrolyte membrane.

[0142] According to various exemplary embodiments of the present invention, for the antioxidant for electrolyte membranes of fuel cells and methods for manufacturing the same cerium-based antioxidants injected into electrolyte membranes may be supported and fixed on the surface of silicon dioxide, thereby improving dissolution stability based on chemical bonding.

[0143] In addition, cerium-based antioxidant crystal particles having a size less than the predetermined range may be supported, thereby improving antioxidant activity.

[0144] In addition, by improving bonding property of SiOCe between cerium oxide introduced as a cerium precursor and silicon dioxide, antioxidants including cerium oxide may be in greater uniformity supported on silicon dioxide nanotubes.

[0145] In addition, since hydrophilic silicon dioxide nanotubes are used as supports, proton conductivity may be enhanced by improving water collection or absorption effects.

[0146] The invention has been described in detail with reference to various exemplary embodiments thereof. However, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that changes may be made in these embodiments without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.