Double wall duct connector

Abstract

A double wall round or oval duct system assembly having an outer duct connector, an inner duct connector and a closure ring is provided. The inner duct connector of the duct assembly has an adhesive applied on the transverse flange face of its transverse flange thus allowing a sealing connection between the inner and outer duct connectors upon compression with the closure ring. The double wall round or oval duct system assembly will improve the efficiency and will reduce or eliminate air leakage upon connection of two round or oval duct segments. A method of installing the assembly system is also provided.

Claims

1. An apparatus for connecting adjacent double wall round or oval duct segments comprising: (a) outer round or oval duct connectors each having an inner leg, a leading edge, a vertex and an outer transverse flange extending from the vertex of each outer duct connector, the outer transverse flange extending substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg and having a transverse flange mating face directed away from the inner leg; (b) inner round or oval duct connectors each having an inner leg, a leading edge, a vertex and an inner transverse flange extending from the vertex of each inner duct connector, the inner transverse flange substantially circumscribing the associated vertex, the inner transverse flange extending substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg and having a transverse flange face directed toward the inner leg, and an adhesive disposed on the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange; and (c) a closure ring placed over the outer transverse flanges and inner transverse flanges of mating duct connectors with the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange and the transverse flange mating face of the outer transverse flange being maintained in contact by the adhesive.

2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the adhesive is a double-sided adhesive.

3. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the adhesive is a unitary piece disposed about the periphery of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange.

4. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the adhesive surface area is smaller than the surface area of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange and is disposed on the outer perimeter of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange.

5. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the inner duct connector comprises a circumferential adjustment split to modify the cross-sectional dimension of the inner duct connector.

6. The apparatus of claim 5, wherein the circumferential adjustment split of the inner duct connector allows for connection of metal duct sections having different cross-sectional dimensions.

7. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the adhesive is not exposed and does not come into contact with the airstream.

8. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the connection between the double wall round or oval duct segments provides a fit so that vibrations are reduced.

9. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the metal duct connection is capable of a pipe pressure of at least 18 w.g. positive and 10 w.g negative without the adhesive failing.

10. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the metal duct connection maintains the round or oval cross-sectional dimensions of the adjacent duct segments upon installation.

11. A method for connecting adjacent double wall round or oval spiral duct segments comprising: (a) providing double wall round or oval duct segments in need of connection; (b) providing outer round or oval duct connectors each having an inner leg, a leading edge, a vertex and an outer transverse flange extending from the vertex of each outer duct connector, the outer transverse flange extending substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg and having a transverse flange mating face directed away from the inner leg; (c) providing inner round or oval duct connectors each having an inner leg, a leading edge, a vertex and one inner transverse flange extending from the vertex of each inner duct connector, the inner transverse flange substantially circumscribing the associated vertex, the inner transverse flange extending substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg and having a transverse flange face directed toward the inner leg, and an adhesive disposed on the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange; (d) inserting the leading edges of the outer duct connectors in the round or oval duct segments in need of connection; (e) inserting the leading edges of the inner duct connectors in the round or oval duct segments in need of connection; (f) abutting the outer transverse flange of the outer duct connector to the adhesive of the inner transverse flange of the inner duct connector to substantially align the inner volumes of the adjacent duct segments; (g) placing a closure ring over the inner transverse flanges and outer transverse flanges of mating duct connectors with the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange and the transverse flange mating face of the outer transverse flange being put in contact by the adhesive, the closure ring comprising fastening means; and (h) fastening the closure ring to form a seal between the inner and outer duct connectors.

12. The method of claim 11, wherein the adhesive is a double-sided adhesive.

13. The method of claim 11, wherein the adhesive is a unitary piece disposed about the periphery of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange.

14. The method of claim 11, wherein the adhesive surface area is smaller than the surface area of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange and is disposed on the outer perimeter of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange.

15. The method of claim 11, wherein the inner duct connector comprises a circumferential adjustment split to modify the cross-sectional dimension of the inner duct connector.

16. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of adapting the cross-sectional dimensions of the inner and outer duct connectors to the cross-sectional dimensions of the duct segments via circumferential adjustment splits in the inner and outer duct connectors.

17. The method of claim 11, wherein the adhesive is not exposed and does not come into contact with the airstream.

18. The method of claim 11, wherein the step of fastening the closure ring further allows for a connection resulting in reduced vibrations.

19. The method of claim 11, wherein the metal duct connection is capable of a pipe pressure of at least 18 w.g. positive and 10 w.g negative without the adhesive failing.

20. The method of claim 11, wherein the method further comprises maintaining the cross-sectional dimensions of the adjacent double wall round duct segments at the connection.

21. The method of claim 11, further comprising the step of inserting a gasket between the outer transverse flanges of the outer duct connectors and/or the inner transverse flanges of the inner duct connectors.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

(1) FIG. 1 is an isometric view of a pair of double wall round duct segments connected by a duct connector apparatus which is the subject of this invention.

(2) FIG. 2 is a top view along the central axis of the duct segments of FIG. 1.

(3) FIG. 3 is a partial sectional view taken along line A-A in FIG. 2 illustrating a pair of inner round duct connectors, each being connected via an adhesive to the corresponding outer round duct connector, and a closure ring securing the inner and outer duct connector and forming a seal between a pair of adjacent round ducts segments, with gasket material compressed between the mating inner and outer transverse flanges of the duct sections.

(4) FIG. 4 is a partial sectional view of a connection apparatus similar to FIG. 3 illustrating the exposed edges of the flange of the outer duct connectors sealingly embedded in gasket material when the transverse flanges of the inner duct connectors do not match the length of the transverse flanges of the outer duct connectors.

(5) FIG. 5 is an isometric view of an inner round duct connector showing adhesive tape disposed on the outer perimeter of the face of the flange and a circumferential adjustment split in the duct connector to facilitate insertion in the duct segment in need of connection.

(6) FIG. 6 is a top view of the inner duct connector of FIG. 5.

(7) FIG. 7 is a graph representing the leakage in function of the pressure corresponding to the testing samples of Example 2.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

(8) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the term duct segment includes a cylindrical tube used to transport air such as round and oval ducts.

(9) As used herein a non-limiting example of the term round duct segment includes a cylindrical tube used to transport air having a round circumference.

(10) A non-limiting example of the term ductwork includes straight pieces of duct, duct segments, duct connectors, and all types of fittings.

(11) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the term double wall duct segment includes an inner duct segmentor interior duct walland an outer duct segmentor exterior duct wallseparated by a layer of insulating material.

(12) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the term adjacent duct segments includes pieces of double wall duct that are to be joined together.

(13) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the terms gasket or gasket material includes any type of sealing or adhesive material that reduces air leakage between the joints of a ductwork.

(14) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the term sealed connection includes a ductwork connection or joint between double wall duct segments, including the inner and outer duct segments, that has less leakage than a ductwork connection or joint without an adhesive or adhesive material between double wall duct segments and allows for the connection to be maintained without loss of shape. A non-limiting example of adhesive, which may be used to sealingly connect inner and outer double wall duct segments, is double sided tape.

(15) As used herein, a non-limiting example of the term, the term circumferential adjustment split includes a split or cut along the axis in the duct segment or connector, thus allowing for the segment or connector's diameter to be adjusted.

(16) FIG. 1 shows the assembly 100 of two double wall round duct segments 110 and 120 connected by the connecting apparatus 130. The double wall round duct segments 110 and 120 are generally cylindrical sheet metal bodies with outwardly projecting spiral ribs 105 on the outside at evenly spaced intervals along their lengths. The double wall round duct segments contain a layer of insulating material 112 between an interior duct wall 114 and an exterior duct wall 116. As later discussed in detail, the round duct segments are described as having a generally circular configuration. It should be understood, however, that the apparatus of the present invention applies also to corresponding oval duct segments.

(17) FIG. 2 shows a view of apparatus 200 along the center axis parallel to the airstream in FIG. 1.

(18) FIG. 3 is a sectional view illustrating the connector apparatus generally designated by the numeral 300 for connecting two double wall round duct segments 310 and 320 each having exterior duct walls 311 and 321, respectively, and interior duct walls 313 and 323, respectively. Each segment comprises two duct walls separated by insulation material 315 having an insulation thickness C. The connecting apparatus includes two outer round duct connectors 340 each having an inner leg 342. The outer round duct connectors each have at the vertex 344 an outer transverse flange 346. The outer transverse flange extends substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg 342 and has a transverse flange mating face 348 directed away from the inner leg 342. The apparatus for connecting the two round duct segments also comprises two inner round duct connectors 350 each having an inner leg 352. The inner round duct connectors each have at the vertex 354 an inner transverse flange 356. The inner transverse flange 356 substantially circumscribes the associated vertex 354 and extends substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg 352 and has a transverse flange face 358 directed toward the inner leg 352. An adhesive 360 is disposed on the transverse flange face 358 of the inner transverse flange 350. The apparatus further comprises a closure ring 330 placed over the outer transverse flanges 346 and inner transverse flanges 356 of mating duct connectors 340 and 350 with the transverse flange face 358 of each inner transverse flange sealingly connected with the transverse flange mating face 348 of each outer transverse flange by the adhesive 360. As shown in FIG. 3, the adhesive is not exposed and does not come into contact with the airstream.

(19) A suitable amount of gasket 370 may be placed in annular void 372 to provide a sealed connection between the outer transverse flanges 346 of mating outer duct connectors 340 and/or between the inner transverse flanges 356 of mating inner duct connectors 350. As seen in FIG. 3, gasket material 370 is placed in annular void 372, and mating transverse flanges 346, which are adhesively connected to mating transverse flanges 356, are embedded in the gasket 370 upon compression under the closure ring 330. In addition to the adhesive connecting the transverse flange faces of the transverse flanges of the inner and outer duct connectors, the gasket material 370 provides an airtight seal to further ensure that air passing through the connection between round duct segments 310 and 320 does not escape through annular void 372 to the atmosphere.

(20) As shown in the configuration illustrated in FIG. 3, the connection between the round duct segments 310 and 320 provides an excellent seal. With this configuration, the resulting connection is such that vibrations are reduced and the connection is capable of a pipe pressure of at least 18 w.g. positive and 10 w.g negative without the adhesive failing. In addition, the seal provided by the use of adhesive, which may be double sided tape, between the transverse flange faces of the inner transverse flange and the outer transverse flange of each mating inner and outer duct connector allows for the cross-sectional dimensions or diameters of adjacent duct segments 310 and 320 to be maintained without loss of shape upon connection between such segments.

(21) When assembling adjacent duct segments 310 and 320 using inner and outer round duct connectors 350 and 340, respectively, and a closure ring 330 to provide a completed connection of a double wall round duct system assembly 300, the following steps are provided.

(22) First, two double wall round duct segments 310 and 320 in need of connection are provided. Outer round duct connectors 340, each having an inner leg 342, a vertex 344, a leading edge 345 and an outer transverse flange 346 extending from vertex 344 of each outer duct connector 340, are also provided. The outer transverse flange 346 extends substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg 342 and has a transverse flange mating face 348 directed away from the inner leg 342. The method further comprises providing inner round duct connectors 350 each having an inner leg 352, a vertex 354, a leading edge 355, and one inner transverse flange 356 extending from vertex 354 of each inner duct connector 350. The inner transverse flange 356 substantially circumscribes the associated vertex 354 and extends substantially perpendicularly from the inner leg 352. The inner round duct connector 350 can be separate and not connected to outer round duct connector 340 when provided. The inner transverse flange 356 has a transverse flange mating face 358 directed toward the inner leg 352 and an adhesive 360 is disposed on its transverse flange mating face 358. The method further comprises the step of inserting the leading edges 345 of the outer duct connectors in the exterior duct walls 311 and 321 of round duct segments 310 and 320 in need of connection. The method then provides the step of inserting the leading edge 355 of the inner duct connectors in the interior duct walls 313 and 323 of the round duct segments 310 and 320 in need of connection. The method also comprises abutting the transverse flange mating face of the outer transverse flange 346 of the outer duct connector 340 to the adhesive 360 on the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange 356 of the inner duct connector 350 to substantially align the inner volumes of the adjacent round duct segments 310 and 320. The method further comprises placing a closure ring 330 over the inner transverse flanges 356 and outer transverse flanges 346 of mating round duct sections 350 and 340 with the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange 356 and the transverse flange mating face of the outer transverse flange 346 being put in contact by the adhesive 360, the closure ring may comprise fastening means, which are known in the art and may include a clamp-type mechanism, for example. The method further comprises fastening the closure ring to complete and secure the two duct segments and to form a seal between the inner air stream and outer atmosphere duct sections. The fastening of the closure ring results in compression of gasket 370 and of the adhesive 360 between the inner and outer transverse flange faces of the duct connectors thus allowing for an excellent sealing connection.

(23) FIG. 4 is a partial sectional view of a connection apparatus 400 similar to that shown in FIG. 3 but illustrating the exposed edges of the outer transverse flange 446 of the outer duct connectors 440 sealingly embedded in gasket material 470 when the inner transverse flanges 456 of the inner duct connectors 450 do not match the length of the outer transverse flanges 446 of the outer duct connectors 440. In this configuration, the adhesive 460 provides a sealed connection between the outer transverse flanges 346 and the corresponding inner transverse flanges 356 of mating duct connectors 340 and 350. A closure ring 430 is placed over the outer transverse flanges 346 and inner transverse flanges 356, providing a seal between round duct segments 410 and 420 having an insulation thickness D. The round duct segments may have interior 411 and exterior 413 duct walls separating the insulation material 415, with varying insulation thickness D, while still allowing the adhesive 460 to seal the inner and outer transverse flanges together as illustrated in FIG. 4.

(24) As illustrated in FIGS. 5 and 6, the inner round duct section 350 of FIG. 3 may include a circumferential adjustment split 380 allowing the inner leg 352 of the inner duct connector to be slidably positioned in the circular interior duct end portion of the round duct segment in need of connection, the circumferential adjustment split being utilized allows to increase or decrease the diameter of the duct connector, thus allowing adapting the diameter of the inner duct connector to the diameter of the corresponding round duct segment.

(25) FIGS. 5 and 6 also illustrate the use of double-sided adhesive 360 on the inner transverse flange of the inner duct connector. In particular, the adhesive 360 may be a unitary piece disposed about the periphery of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange 356. Furthermore, the adhesive may be such that its surface area is smaller than the surface area of the transverse flange face 358 of the inner transverse flange and is disposed on the outer perimeter of the transverse flange face of the inner transverse flange.

(26) The following examples and accompanying FIG. 7 will further explain the invention.

EXAMPLES

Example 1

(27) Objective:

(28) To compare the leakage of a SPIRALMATE connection with inner ring (attached with BNGASKET) to a standard SPIRALMATE connection (without inner ring) to determine if BNGASKET is an acceptable attachment method. This will be achieved over several tests required.

(29) Overview:

(30) All tests will be done with a two connection system per SMACNA requirements. The tests performed will be leakage trials for Standard SPIRALMATE connection and Standard SPIRALMATE connection with inner ring connected with double-sided tape/gasket. This will be trialed for both small and large profile SPIRALMATE connections.

(31) Materials & Instrumentation:

(32) The following material and instrumentation were used:

(33) (3) 10 Dia2 Long, round spiral pipe

(34) (3) 40 Dia2 Long, round spiral pipe

(35) Cadillac Products blower unit, Model: HP33P

(36) Meriam laminar flow element, Model: 50MC2-2, Range: 0-20 psi

(37) Extech Differential Pressure Manometer, Model: HD700, Range: 0-2 psi

(38) Retrotec Digital Manometer, Model: DM32, Range 3 to +3 inches of WC

(39) Bullnose neoprene gasket tape 1/16 Thk Wide, PN: BNGASKET

(40) PROseal duct sealant, PN: PROSEAL1

(41) Butyl tape 440, PN: 440 3/16

(42) SPIRALMATE gasket material, PN: NEO 5/16

(43) Test Samples:

(44) The following are the test samples described herein:

(45) (4) 10 Dia small profile SPIRALMATE complete connections w/inner rings

(46) (4) 40 Dia large profile SPIRALMATE complete connections w/inner rings

(47) Installation

(48) Connect the Cadillac Products blower unit to the Meriam laminar flow element then to the duct mock-up. Make sure the Extech Differential Pressure Manometer is connected to the Meriam laminar flow element and the Retrotec Digital Manometer is ported into the beginning of the duct mock-up (see FIGS. 5-2 page 5-3 in the SMACNA HVAC Air Duct Leakage Test Manual, incorporated by reference in its entirety herein).

(49) The duct mock-up will consist of three sections equivalent in length connected together by the SPIRALMATE trials that are attached with #10 Tek screws around the circumference and sealed. Make sure all joints, not including the actual SPIRALMATE connection, are sealed with proper sealant to avoid leaks.

(50) Test Procedural Definitions:

(51) Use the Cadillac Products blower unit to induce a positive and negative pressure inside the duct mock-up. Use the Meriam laminar flow element to measure the airflow at 10 in and +10 in WG pressure in increments. Repeat this for all connections.

(52) Test and record the large standard SPIRALMATE connection. Assemble as listed in the installation instructions on the product spec sheet.

(53) Test and record the large standard SPIRALMATE connection with the inner ring attached using BNGASKET to connect it (attach in segments of tape approx. 3.0 long eq. spaced, 8 pcs). Assemble as listed in the installation instructions on the product spec sheet.

(54) Test and record the small standard SPIRALMATE connection. Assemble as listed in the installation instructions on the product spec sheet.

(55) Test and record the small standard SPIRALMATE connection with the inner ring attached using BNGASKET to connect it (attach in segments of tape approx. 3.0 long eq. spaced, 4 pcs). Assemble as listed in the installation instructions on the product spec sheet.

(56) Test Results

(57) The test results are provided in the following Tables (Tables 1-4) and accompanying Figures (FIGS. 7-11).

(58) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 10 Diameter 10 Dia. Std. connection Test pressure (IN of H2O) 0.5 1 2 4 8 10 Positive pressure 3.199 4.526 6.257 8.589 11.884 13.224 CFM reading Positive pressure 3.284 4.471 6.364 8.570 12.001 13.457 CFM Tare Leakage 0.085 0.055 0.107 0.019 0.117 0.233 Leakage Class 0.85 0.35 0.43 0.05 0.19 0.33 Negative pressure 2.854 4.047 5.848 8.275 12.058 13.450 CFM reading Negative pressure 2.920 4.168 5.906 8.218 11.840 13.188 CFM Tare Leakage 0.066 0.121 0.059 0.057 0.217 0.261 Leakage Class 0.66 0.77 0.24 0.15 0.36 0.37
Leakage was only detected at 2 screws with soapy water.

(59) TABLE-US-00002 TABLE 2 10 Dia. Std. connection w/ Inner Ring & BNGASKET Test pressure (IN of H2O) 0.5 1 2 4 8 10 Positive pressure 2.961 4.511 5.744 7.756 10.552 11.596 CFM reading Positive pressure 2.985 4.160 5.682 7.895 10.611 11.555 CFM Tare Leakage 0.024 0.351 0.061 0.140 0.059 0.041 Leakage Class 0.24 2.24 0.25 0.36 0.10 0.06 Negative 2.891 4.027 5.722 8.045 11.621 13.181 pressure CFM reading Negative 2.712 3.903 5.563 7.942 11.526 12.977 pressure CFM Tare Leakage 0.179 0.123 0.159 0.103 0.095 0.204 Leakage Class 1.78 0.78 0.65 0.27 0.16 0.29
Leakage only detected at 2 screws and at one spot at each connection with soapy water

(60) TABLE-US-00003 TABLE 3 36 Diameter 36 Dia. Std. connection Test pressure (IN of H2O) 0.5 1 2 4 8 10 Positive 2.827 3.742 5.110 6.749 9.109 10.110 pressure CFM reading Positive 2.754 3.748 5.149 6.830 9.151 10.054 pressure CFM Tare Leakage 0.073 0.006 0.039 0.081 0.042 0.057 Leakage Class 0.20 0.01 0.04 0.06 0.02 0.02 Negative 2.671 3.842 5.367 7.615 11.068 12.285 pressure CFM reading Negative 2.678 3.822 5.367 7.615 11.007 12.254 pressure CFM Tare Leakage 0.007 0.020 0.000 0.000 0.061 0.031 Leakage Class 0.02 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.01
No Leakage detected with soapy water

(61) TABLE-US-00004 TABLE 4 36 Dia. Std. connection w/ Inner Ring & BNGASKET Test pressure (IN of H2O) 0.5 1 2 4 8 10 Positive pressure 2.774 3.811 5.233 7.080 9.608 10.763 CFM reading Positive pressure 2.883 3.889 5.208 7.056 9.302 10.645 CFM Tare Leakage 0.110 0.078 0.025 0.024 0.307 0.118 Leakage Class 0.30 0.14 0.03 0.02 0.14 0.05 Negative 2.664 3.788 5.387 7.861 11.153 12.495 pressure CFM reading Negative 2.582 3.680 5.276 7.650 10.901 12.169 pressure CFM Tare Leakage 0.082 0.107 0.111 0.211 0.252 0.326 Leakage Class 0.23 0.19 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.13
Leakage was only detected at one Flange where Alignment tool was used and mastic was pulled out.
Conclusions

(62) The results of this round of testing were much more consistent and accurate than the first attempt. Minimal leakage was observed (if any) in every test sample. For 10 diameter connections, leakage values ranged from 0.233 to 0.351 CFM, with negligible differences between connections with and without the inner rings. For 36 diameter connections, leakage values ranged from 0.110 to 0.326 CFM, with negligible differences between connections with and without inner rings.

(63) Negative leakage values typically result from an inaccurate tare due to % error in equipment or inherent uncontrollable variables in the system. All leakage values are low enough to conclude that there were no major flaws in the system or the test method. Additionally, it was evident that there are no major differences (in terms of leakage) between the two sizes (10 & 36) or between the types of connections (with and without inner rings).

(64) Overall, BNGASKET adhered better than the other tapes (trialed in first round of tests). Due to the cost and overall performance, it was determined that BNGASKET serves as an acceptable method for attaching the inner ring to the SPIRALMATE flange.

Example 2

(65) Objective:

(66) There are two primary objectives to this series of tests. First is to compare the leakage of a SPIRALMATE connection with centered inner rings (attached with PSA Tape) using double-wall duct to a similar connection with non-centered inner rings. Second is to compare the leakage of a SPIRALMATE connection using double-wall duct where flange and inner ring splices are misaligned vs. aligned.

(67) Overview:

(68) All tests will be done with a one-connection system. The tests performed will be leakage trials for a standard SPIRALMATE connection with inner rings attached (concentric vs. non-concentric & aligned vs. misaligned splices) using double-sided tape/gasket. Only large profile SPIRALMATE connections will be used, due to the diameter of duct being tested. The application of the inner rings on large diameter double-wall duct will also be trialed for determining difficulty.

(69) Materials & Instrumentation:

(70) The following material and instrumentation were used:

(71) (2) 40 Dia.10 Long, round spiral double-wall duct

(72) Cadillac Products blower unit, Model: HP33P

(73) Meriam laminar flow element, Model: 50MC2-2, Range: 0-20 psi

(74) Extech Differential Pressure Manometer, Model: HD700, Range: 0-2 psi

(75) Retrotec Digital Manometer, Model: DM32, Range 3 to +3 inches of WC

(76) Bull nose neoprene gasket tape: 1/16 Thick Wide

(77) ProSeal duct sealant, PN: PROSEAL1

(78) Butyl tape 440, PN: 440 3/16

(79) SPIRALMATE gasket material, PN: NEO 5/16

(80) Test Samples:

(81) (2) 40 Dia. large profile SPIRALMATE connection w/inner rings

(82) Installation:

(83) Connect the Cadillac Products blower unit to the Meriam laminar flow element then to the duct mock-up. Make sure the Extech Differential Pressure Manometer is connected to the Meriam laminar flow element and the Retrotec Digital Manometer is ported into the beginning of the duct mock-up (see FIG. 5-2 page 5-3 in the SMACNA HVAC Air Duct Leakage Test Manual).

(84) The duct mock-up will consist of two sections equivalent in length connected together using the SPIRALMATE system, attached with #10 Tek screws around the circumference and sealed. Make sure all joints, not including the actual SPIRALMATE connection, are sealed with proper sealant to avoid leaks.
Test Procedural Definitions:

(85) Use the Cadillac Products blower unit to induce a positive and negative pressure inside the duct mock-up. Use the Meriam laminar flow element to measure the airflow between 10 in and +10 in WG pressure in 2-in increments. Repeat this for all connections.

(86) Test and record leakage of the large SPIRALMATE connection with non-centered inner ring and aligned splices, using PSA tape.

(87) Test and record leakage of the large SPIRALMATE connection with centered inner ring and misaligned flange & inner ring splices, using PSA tape.

(88) Test Results:

(89) The test results are provided in Table 1 and accompanying FIG. 12.

(90) TABLE-US-00005 TABLE 1 SPIRALMATE Inner Ring Leakage Testing SIZE 40 Double-wall Pressure (inches w.g.) 2 4 6 8 10 Test # SCFM Leakage (CFM; less 0.122 0.267 0.190 0.239 0.164 1: Centered; TARE) Misaligned Leakage Class 0.074 0.104 0.057 0.059 0.035 SCFM Leakage (CFM; less 0.081 0.056 0.068 0.183 0.099 2: Not TARE) Centered; Leakage Class 0.049 0.022 0.020 0.045 0.021 Aligned 0.062 0.041 0.038 0.052 0.028 Average (SCFM) 0.020 0.161 0.061 0.028 0.032 Average Class 0.012 0.063 0.018 0.007 0.007 Leakage Class 3 (SCFM) 4.927 7.732 10.063 12.132 14.026
Conclusions

(91) Based on the above data and the graph of FIG. 12, it appears that there is no noticeable difference (in terms of leakage) between the centered/misaligned system and the non-centered/aligned system. With leakage values this low, considering the error in accuracy of the measuring equipment itself, leakage differences between the different (tested) assembly methods can be considered negligible.

(92) When attaching the inner ring to the SPIRALMATE flange, it is much easier to allow the inner ring to follow its natural shape, rather than trying to bend the ring to follow the flange edge. Due to the weight of the inner duct wall and insulation, it was somewhat difficult to force the inner ring to conform to the imperfections of the duct to keep it concentric. This seems to be more apparent as the duct diameter increases and the duct profile takes on more of an oval shape. However, as shown by the test, forcing the inner ring to be concentric with the duct does not affect leakage to a measurable degree.

(93) Various changes could be made in the above apparatus and method without departing from the scope of the invention as defined in the claims below. It is intended that all matter contained in the above description, as shown in the accompanying drawings, shall be interpreted as illustrative and not as a limitation.