Systems and methods for helium liquefaction
10533792 ยท 2020-01-14
Inventors
Cpc classification
F25B9/02
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0221
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25B9/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J1/0007
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2205/10
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2210/42
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
F25J2210/04
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
International classification
Abstract
A helium liquefaction system with a thermally reactive nosecone is described. The system further includes a tip having a slanted intake aperture, a shaft, a thermally reactive bore and a nosecone functioning as a hypersonic vortex generator. Further the system may be configured as a standalone helium liquefaction plant, whereby the compressed helium is regeneratively chilled into the cryogenic zone.
Claims
1. An apparatus for a helium liquefaction comprising: a tip, the tip having a slanted intake aperture; a shaft; a thermally reactive bore; a regenerative isentropic expansion nozzle; and a nosecone functioning as a vortex generator.
2. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, further comprising thermally reactive spline capillary discs bleeding work/heat of isothermal compression.
3. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 2, wherein the work/heat of isothermal compression is dissipated via Joule-Thomson throttling/refrigeration.
4. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 2, wherein the spline capillary discs enable Joule-Thomson throttling within a Joule-Thomson zone @25K.
5. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein Helium is a working fluid.
6. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein Joule-Thomson throttling kickstarts Carnot refrigeration within a Helium saturation zone in compliance with a hot-to-cold flow of heat distinction in accordance with the second law of thermodynamics.
7. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein liquid Helium is being distilled by vacuum suction.
8. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein Joule-Thomson throttling/refrigeration and Carnot refrigeration are germane events within a helium saturation zone.
9. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein a primary stochastic vortex flux is transformed into a double helix vortex by means of a sudden Coanda expansion at a tail end of a vortex tube spawning Joule Thomson throttling refrigeration.
10. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 9, wherein an exit double helix vortex flux is reset into a supersonic isentropic continuum downstream of a Coanda expansion switch by means of spline slots and a vortex flux spawning a tier Joule-Thomson refrigeration.
11. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 10, wherein a high-pressure Helium source is sub-cooled into the cryogenic zone via a flashing of liquid nitrogen proximal 70K prior to hypersonic isentropic expansion and stochastic conversion.
12. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 11, wherein the high-pressure Helium source is regeneratively chilled to proximal 35K by liquid hydrogen prior to hypersonic expansion enabling complex Carnot refrigeration.
13. The apparatus for a helium liquefaction as in claim 1, wherein the shaft is constructed out of inert and/or thermally reactive porous sinter.
Description
DRAWING DESCRIPTIONS
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
DETAILED DESCRIPTION
(5) Persons skilled in the art will recognize that many modifications and variations are possible in the details, materials, and arrangements of the parts and actions which have been described and illustrated in order to explain the nature of this inventive concept and that such modifications and variations do not depart from the spirit and scope of the teachings and claims contained therein.
(6) Referring
(7) Referring
(8) Referring
(9) Referring
(10) In accordance with logarithmic scaled diagram 431 reference 410 infer ambient conditions @300K, 420 infer liquid Nitrogen precool threshold @70K, 430 infer liquid Hydrogen precool threshold @35K, 440 infer the 10 C disparity (35K to 25K) between known and necessary Helium liquefaction means, 450 infer the Helium liquefaction threshold @5K, 460 infers (copper) superconductivity threshold @4K, 470 infer Nitrogen disparity/dead zone/bridge (70K to 25K), 471 infer the Joule-Thomson throttling zone, 472 infer Carnot refrigeration reactive range, 473 infer the vacuum range whereby Joule-Thomson throttling trumps Carnot refrigeration, 431 depict h=t) Joule-Thomson responsiveness above 25K, 402 depict entry into Joule-Thomson reactive zone (h=t+PV)@25K, 433 depict rapidly expanding Joule-Thomson throttling @5K (driving complex/cryogenic Carnot cycle in compliance with the 2.sup.nd Law of thermodynamics whereby heat can only be rejected from a warmer to a colder sink.
(11) Referring
(12) Referring
(13) In order to transform a high pressure supersonic isentropic expansion nozzle into a regenerative supersonic stochastic vortex flux bridging the absolute-zero (Joule-Thompson) dead zone (and the constraints of Claude/Linde Helium liquefaction means), into a absolute-zero (cryogenic) refrigeration engine via (1) the addition of a secondary isentropic expansion nozzle that kickstarts Carnot refrigeration in the Helium saturation zone (2) fluctuating stagnation swings/surging and (3) fractional Helium bleed driving Joule-Thomson throttling/refrigeration (heat sink dissipating the work/heat of isothermal compression) in the (Helium) vacuum (suction) zone in compliance with the second law of thermodynamics whereby heat can only flow from a warm source to a colder sink.
(14) TABLE-US-00001 TABLE 1 3.14286 Int Rndm ln .sup.2 .sup.3 .sup.4 .sup.0.286 1 .sup.0.286 .sup.0.286 1 1 1 0 1 0.94 1 1 0 0 2 4 1.39 16 0.95 256 1.49 0.12 0.49 3 2 0.69 4 0.94 16 1.22 0.058 0.22 4 8 2.08 64 0.97 4096 1.81 0.185 0.81 5 5 1.61 25 0.95 625 1.58 0.141 0.58 6 7 1.95 49 0.96 2401 1.74 0.173 0.74 7 1 0 1 0.94 1 1 0 0 8 4 1.39 16 0.95 256 1.49 0.12 0.49 9 2 0.69 4 0.94 16 1.22 0.058 0.22 10 9 2.2 81 0.97 6561 1.87 0.197 0.87 10 43 11.99 261 9.53 3418801 2.93 0.36 4.43 4.3 0.28 6.07 19.04 79507 0.07 0.008 0.1
(15) The experimental evidence for the above described helium liquefaction was found in the probability density postulation as shown by Table-1 above. The M3/4/5/7 actual reaction vector/measurements conformed with 0.28 of the theoretical (linear/isentropic) computational model. Applying the probability density postulation hence to a perfect harmonic Gauss-Markov compliant Super duct the absolute temperature transformation of 2.93 is being rendered. (which because of extreme/wildly stagnation gyrations generating 2.93 absolute temperature scale gyrations in the helium saturation zone in accordance with the Gauss-Markov driven randomness postulation) opens the door to absolute-zero Carnot refrigeration.