BLOCH MIRROR RESONATOR AND DISTRIBUTED FEEDBACK LASER USING SAME

Abstract

A resonator is provided having a waveguide with a first boundary, a second boundary parallel to the first boundary, a first end, a second end, and a waveguide cavity at least partly between the first boundary and the second boundary. A first grating, having a period of distance a, is at the first boundary of the waveguide, and a second grating, having a period of distance a, is at the second boundary of the waveguide. The first and second boundaries are separated by a constant distance d. The first boundary may have a periodic profile aligned with a periodic profile of the second boundary. The periodic profile of the first boundary and the second boundary may be a sinusoidal profile, a square profile, or profile of another shape. The resonator may be suitable for use in a distributed feedback laser.

Claims

1. A resonator, comprising: a waveguide having a first boundary, a second boundary parallel to the first boundary, a first end, a second end, and a waveguide cavity at least partly between the first boundary and the second boundary; a first grating at the first boundary of the waveguide, the first grating having a period of distance a; a second grating at the second boundary of the waveguide, the second grating having a period of distance a; wherein a distance d between the first boundary and the second boundary is equal to $\frac{a}{2}.Math.\sqrt{p^2-m^2},$ where p and m are mode indices in the waveguide and p>m.

2. The resonator of claim 1, wherein a periodic profile of the first boundary is aligned with a periodic profile of the second boundary along the waveguide.

3. The resonator of claim 1, wherein the waveguide mode indices are p=2 and m=1, and the distance d between the first boundary and the second boundary is equal to a{square root over (3)}/2.

4. The resonator of claim 1, wherein a first phase of the first grating is substantially aligned with a second phase of the second grating.

5. The resonator of claim 1, wherein the waveguide cavity is an optical waveguide.

6. The resonator of claim 5, wherein the optical waveguide comprises a dielectric material having a high refractive index.

7. The resonator of claim 6, wherein the dielectric material is GaN.

8. The resonator of claim 1, wherein the first grating and second grating have a sinusoidal profile.

9. The resonator of claim 1, wherein the first grating and second grating have a profile with a thickness between 10% and 30% (inclusive) of the distance d.

10. The resonator of claim 1, wherein the first grating and the second grating are formed using one or more transducers.

11. The resonator of claim 10, wherein one or more transducers are acousto-optic transducers.

12. The resonator of claim 10, wherein one or more transducers are electro-optic transducers.

13. The resonator of claim 10, wherein one or more transducers are piezoelectric transducers.

14. The resonator of claim 10, wherein the first grating and the second grating are acoustic waves.

15. The resonator of claim 1, further comprising an active layer for light generation.

16. A distributed feedback laser, comprising a resonator according to claim 1.

Description

DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0018] For a fuller understanding of the nature and objects of the disclosure, reference should be made to the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:

[0019] FIG. 1 is a diagram of a prior art Bragg mirror with a grating period a and an average thickness d;

[0020] FIG. 2A is a diagram of a sinusoidal boundary Bloch mirror resonator of the present disclosure with a grating period a and a constant thickness d, wherein the sinusoidal shapes of upper and lower boundaries are aligned (in phase) along the x-axis;

[0021] FIG. 2B is a diagram of the sinusoidal boundary Bloch mirror resonator from FIG. 2A where the resonator is gallium nitride;

[0022] FIG. 3 is a diagram of a rectangular boundary Bloch mirror resonator according to another embodiment of the present disclosure, with a grating period a and a thickness d, wherein the rectangular shapes of upper and lower boundaries are aligned (in phase) along the x-axis providing constant thickness d;

[0023] FIG. 4 is a diagram of a rectangular boundary Bloch mirror resonator of another embodiment of the present disclosure with a grating period a, a constant thickness d, and a thickness modulation of , further depicting multicolored (white) light traveling along the x-axis;

[0024] FIG. 5A is a diagram of an experimental set-up for measuring microwave transmission through a sinusoidal boundary Bloch resonator (waveguide) with a length L, thickness d, and lateral plate shift x, using a transmitting horn antenna, a receiving horn antenna, and Vector Network Analyzer (VNA, not shown), showing the x-y cross section of the waveguide (polarization of the TE.sub.01 WAVE radiated by the horn is along the z-axis);

[0025] FIG. 5B is a frequency response measurement plot of the test set-up of FIG. 5A for the

[0026] Bragg mirror resonator configuration (x=a/2) having periodic boundary profiles that are out of alignment having a relative phase shift of 180 degrees or a/2, and the Bloch mirror resonator configuration (x=0) having periodic boundary profiles that are aligned (in phase). Measured S.sub.21 versus frequency for two cases: (a) x=0 (black line), where a 3.2 GHz Bloch gap opens at 11.2 GHz and k.sub.x=0; and (b) x=a/2 (blue line), where a 2 GHz Bragg gap opens at 7.6 GHz and k.sub.x=q/2 but the Bloch gap closes. The insets show the geometry of the waveguide for the two cases. The upper x-axis in FIG. 5B shows the range of wavelength that would be confined in a Bloch mirror resonator if the waveguide was scaled down to the order of wavelengths of light. The Bloch mirror would easily confine all rainbow components ranging from 650 nm (red) and 475 nm (blue) or even beyond this range.

[0027] FIGS. 6A shows the E field amplitude distribution along the y-axis for degenerate states k.sub.y,0,2 and k.sub.y,1,1 with the same frequency at Bloch resonance (x=0); 6B dispersion (k) for symmetric waveguide (x=a/2); and 6C for the asymmetric case at x=0, and for d=a{square root over (3)}/2=2.72 cm; and

[0028] FIG. 7 is a transformation of FIG. 6C dispersion due to the Bloch geometric resonance at d=a{square root over (3)}/2=2.72 cm and x=0. The degenerate cutoff frequency 11 GHz in FIG. 6C splits into two: f.sub.0,2.sup.+=12.6 GHz and f.sub.1,1.sup.+=9.3 GHz, opening a 3.35 GHz Bloch gap (shaded) at k.sub.x=0.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE DISCLOSURE

[0029] In one aspect of the present disclosure, a resonator for a distributed feedback (DFB) is provided which is suitable to replace a conventional DFB laser grating (mirror).

[0030] With reference to FIG. 2A, the present disclosure may be embodied as a resonator 10 having a waveguide 12 with a first boundary 14 and a second boundary 16. The second boundary 16 is parallel to the first boundary 14 and their periodic profiles are aligned along the x-axis. The resonator 10 has a first end 24 and a second end 26. A first grating 20 is at the first boundary 14 of the waveguide 12. The first grating 20 has a period of distance a. A second grating 22 is at the second boundary 16 of the waveguide 12. The second grating 22 has a period of distance a. The first boundary 14 and second boundary 16 are separated by a distance d that is constant along the x-axis. The distance d may be equal to

[00003]$\frac{a}{2}.Math.\sqrt{p^2-m^2},$

wnere p and m are indices of the waveguide mode and p>m (further described below under the heading Further Discussion). In a particular example, where p=2 and m=1, then d=a{square root over (3)}/2.

[0031] Each of the first grating and the second grating may have a profile which has periodic modulation (a periodic profile). The profile may be sinusoidal, square, or other profiles (see, for example, FIGS. 2A and 3). The amplitude of the modulation (i.e., the thickness of the boundary profile), which may be expressed as , is between 10% and 30% (inclusive) of the distance d. In particular embodiments, may be 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, or 30% of d. It will be recognized that the distance between the first boundary 14 and the second boundary 16 may vary according to the profiles of the gratings at each boundary. For example, FIG. 2A shows that where the first boundary 14 is aligned with the second boundary 16, the distance d is constant. However, where the boundaries are not aligned, the distance d may differ at various positions along the x-axis. As such, the distance d between the first and second boundaries 14,16 may be expressed herein as the distance from an average point of the first grating to an average point of the second grating.

[0032] In a particular embodiment, where the resonator is suitable for use in a distributed feedback laser, the waveguide is an optical waveguide. The optical waveguide may be made from a high-refractive-index material, such as, for example, GaN (n=2.5). Using the axis orientation of the figures for convenience (but not intended to be limiting), the waveguide may be transparent to light along the x-axis.

[0033] The relationship between the thickness d and period a of the mirror may be given by the following formula:

[00004]$\begin{array}{cc}d=\frac{a}{2}.Math.\sqrt{p^2-m^2}& \left(1.Math.a\right)\\ d=p.Math.\frac{{}_0}{2.Math.n}=m.Math.\frac{{}_1}{2.Math.n},\left(p>m\right)& \left(1.Math.b\right)\end{array}$

Where d and a are the thickness and period of the layer, p and m are mode indices (i.e., integer numbers 1, 2, 3 . . . ) where p>m, and .sub.0 and .sub.1 are wavelengths of light for different modes, n is the refractive index of a dielectric (e.g., n=2.5 for GaN).

Further Discussion

[0034] Considering materials with uniform properties and periodic boundary profiles,

[0035] Bloch resonance (BR) and band-gap phenomena are described herein. Bloch resonance and band-gap phenomena are distinct from Bragg phenomena. Specifically, Bloch resonances arise from transverse phase matching (TPM), whereas Bragg resonances are due to longitudinal phase matching (LPM). Moreover, Bloch gaps can be engineered over the entire first Brillouin zone up to an infinite wavelength, i.e., k.sub.x=0, while Bragg gaps open at a fixed wavelength, twice the period of the structure. Wave phenomena for small k.sub.x0 are especially interesting for novel photonic and electronic applications and a Bloch gap at k.sub.x=0 for the electromagnetic (EM) field at GHz frequencies is demonstrated herein. This theory broadly applies to wave phenomena from the quantum to the continuum scale with applications in the fields of solid-state physics, acoustics, photonics, electronics, and lasers, among others.

[0036] A theory of Bloch resonances and gaps is developed herein, and the theory was verified experimentally for the EM field at GHz frequencies. For the experiment, a hollow waveguide with reconfigurable metallic boundary plates was used as shown in FIG. 5A. The waveguide had a length L, average height d, and boundary plates with identical sinusoidal profiles along the direction of propagation. The waveguide transmission spectrum can be tuned via a lateral translation of the upper plate, x along the x-axis, or by a vertical displacement of the plate along the y-axis, which changes d. The behavior of the waveguide was investigated for TE.sub.01 wave propagation (E along the z-axis).

[0037] A traditional method for analyzing wave phenomena in periodic structures is coupled-mode theory, which is well developed and used for applications in integrated optics, solid state electronics, and microwaves. However, most of this work has focused on the coupling of longitudinal waves, for example, longitudinal phase matching (LPM). LPM has been expressed as modified Bragg's law, which follows from an analysis of the field represented as a superposition of waveguide modes. However, this prior analysis rarely addresses the transverse wave components, which are emphasized here.

[0038] A theory of Bloch resonances and gaps is disclosed herein that takes into account the coupling between traveling and standing waves and provides a complete description of wave propagation. The present analysis is based on the field solution as a superposition of eigenstates that include both longitudinal and transverse wave components. The inclusion of transverse components, which have previously been neglected in more traditional mode expansion approximation, leads to new resultsBloch wave phenomenaand is an advantage of the present disclosure. Specifically, the present analysis shows that a Bloch gap occurs when the cutoff frequencies of two transverse orthogonal eigenmodes coincide. In this case, the two independent states are degenerate, which results in the splitting of the degenerate cutoff frequency into two distinct frequencies that are separated by a forbidden gap in the transmission spectrumreferred to herein as the Bloch gap. Analytical expressions are derived that predict Bloch resonances and gaps when the amplitude of the periodic boundary profile is small. This was validated experimentally and provides a fundamental understanding of wave propagation, including Bragg and Bloch gaps, from a unified point of view.

[0039] In the experiment, a sinusoidal profile was defined for the boundaries, i.e., y(x)= cos(qx), where q=2/a and and a are an amplitude and period of the profile, respectively. In the experiment depicted in FIG. 5A, the top plate can be translated along the x-axis and produce a shift x between the plates; i.e., the boundary profiles are given by y.sub.d/2(x)=d2+ cos(qx+), and y.sub.d/2(x)=d/2+ cos(qx), where =(2/a)x.

[0040] The boundary value problem (BVP) for the waveguide reduces to solving Equation (2a), for the z component of the field E.sub.z(x,y) with appropriate boundary conditions (BCs). From the Bloch-Floquet theorem, E.sub.z(x,y) can be represented as the Fourier series in Equation (2b), which is different than a superposition of modes:

[00005]$\begin{array}{cc}.Math..Math..Math.E_z+k_0^2.Math.E_z=0,& \left(2.Math.a\right)\\ E_z\left(x,y\right)=\underset{n=0,.Math.1,\mathrm{.Math.}}{.Math.}.Math.\left[a_n.Math.\cos \left(k_{y,n}.Math.y\right)+b_n.Math.\sin \left(k_{y,n}.Math.y\right)\right]\exp \left[j\left(k_x+\mathrm{nq}\right).Math.x\right]& \left(2.Math.b\right)\end{array}$

where k.sub.0=/c is the wave vector magnitude and k.sub.y,n, k.sub.x are transverse and longitudinal components of k, respectively, and the relation between them, k.sub.y,n.sup.2=k.sub.0.sup.2(k.sub.x+nq).sup.2, follows from Equations (2a) and (2b).

[0041] The solution, Equation (2b), is of the form of a Bloch wave E.sub.z(x,y)=u.sub.k(x,y)e.sup.jk.sup.x.sup.x where u.sub.k equals the summation in Equation (2b) with k.sub.x=0 in the exponent. In solid state physics, the coefficients u.sub.k (x, y) do not typically include a transverse component k.sub.y because a crystal is usually considered to be large enough in the y direction so that periodic Bornvon Krmn BCs apply. However, in the present case, k.sub.y is an advantageous parameter that defines the eigenvalues of the BVP and hence the allowed states. The values of k.sub.y and the dispersion (k) can be determined from Equations (2a) and (2b) by imposing BCs. For the experiment (FIG. 5A), the metallic plates were assumed to be perfect conductors with BCs

[00006]$E_z\left[x,y_{\frac{d}{2}}\left(x\right)\right]=0.$

[0042] These BCs were imposed and a system of linear algebraic equations was obtained for the coefficients a.sub.n and b.sub.n. If the amplitude of the boundary profile is small, i.e., /d<<1 and .sub.q<<1, then, in the first approximation, the equations reduce to six equations for coefficients a.sub.0, a.sub.1, and b.sub.0, b.sub.1 that correspond to the n=+1, 0, 1 harmonics. By equating the 66 determinant of the reduced system of linear equations set to 0, the following characteristic Equation (3) is obtained for the allowed eigenvalues k.sub.y,n. There are six corresponding eigenstates, into which the modes of a flat (=0) waveguide break upon imposing a periodic boundary:

[00007]$\begin{array}{cc}\tan \left(k_{y,0}.Math.d\right)=\frac{{}^2}{2}.Math.\left\{\left(\frac{k_{y,0}.Math.k_{y,+1}}{\tan \left(k_{y,+1}.Math.d\right)}+\frac{k_{y,0}.Math.k_{y,-1}}{\tan \left(k_{y,-1}.Math.d\right)}\right)-\frac{\cos .Math..Math.}{\cos \left(k_{y,0}.Math.d\right)}.Math.\left(\frac{k_{y,0}.Math.k_{y,+1}}{\sin \left(k_{y,+1}.Math.d\right)}+\frac{k_{y,0}.Math.k_{y,-1}}{\sin \left(k_{y,-1}.Math.d\right)}\right)\right\}.& \left(3\right)\end{array}$

Note the invariance of Equation (3) with respect to the interchange of key parameters .Math., k.sub.y,+1.Math.k.sub.y,1, and kx.Math.kx, which reflects an underlying symmetry of the guided wave phenomena.

[0043] The solution of Equation (3) can be found by successive approximations using a small parameter /d: i.e., k.sub.y,0=k.sub.y,0.sup.(0)+k.sub.y,0+. . . , where the k.sub.y,0, etc., represent successive corrections to the solution. In the lowest 0.sup.th order approximation (i.e., =0, a flat boundary), Equation (3) reduces to tan(k.sub.u,0d)=0, resulting in k.sub.y,0.sup.(0)(p)/dk.sub.y,0,p, for p=1,2,3, . . . . Here, k.sub.y,0,p and .sub.0,p=ck.sub.y,0,p denote the p.sup.th modes and cutoff frequencies for the n=0 harmonic, respectfully.

[0044] Next, the resonance states, which occur when the denominators in Equation (3) vanish, are analyzed:

k.sub.y,1d=mk.sub.y,1,md, m=1,2, . . . , (4a)

where

k.sub.y,1={square root over (k.sub.y,0,p2k.sub.xqq.sup.2)}(4b)

[0045] Equation (4a), which involves k.sub.y, is the condition of resonance, which is referred to herein as TPM. This is in contrast, and in addition, to LPM, which involves matching the k.sub.x component to q only. Equation (4b) follows from the relation k.sub.y,n.sup.2=k.sub.0.sup.2(k.sub.x+nq).sup.2 with k.sub.0.sup.2=k.sub.y,0,p.sup.2+k.sub.x.sup.2 taken in the 0.sup.th approximation. The behavior of the system becomes clear from an analysis of Eq. (4b), which indicates that there are two types of resonance caused by the k.sub.x and k.sub.y components, respectively.

[0046] The first type of resonance is associated with LPM and occurs when k.sub.x=q/2, i.e., at the boundaries of the first Brillouin zone (BFBZ), which is the well-known Bragg's law. Substituting k.sub.y,1,m (for k.sub.y,1) into Equation (4b), it was found that at the BFBZ, k.sub.y,1,m=k.sub.y,1,m=k.sub.y,0,p, which implies that m=p for the resonant component. Thus, it was found that Bragg's law is a special case of TPM for m=p. Note that the resonances for k.sub.y,1,m=k.sub.y,1,m are the same because Equation (3) is invariant with respect to the interchange of these parameters (k.sub.y,+1,m.fwdarw.k.sub.y,1,m).

[0047] The second type of resonance, which is defined herein as the Bloch resonance, occurs when k.sub.y,1,md=m but k.sub.xq/2, i.e., not the Bragg case. As an example, for the m=1 resonances, corresponding spatial harmonics are labelled as k.sub.ym1,1. The E field amplitude distribution for these transverse waves along the y-axis is shown in FIG. 6A. Note that the BR can occur at any k.sub.x; however, at k.sub.x=0, it is a resonance between eigenstates corresponding to cutoff frequencies of the fundamental and first spatial harmonics as described below. The resonance at k.sub.x=0 results in a unique band gap structure and is called a geometric BR (GBR) since it only occurs for a unique mix of the geometric parameters when the boundary profiles are aligned, i.e., x=0 and constant d(x).

[0048] To further elucidate the nature of the GBR, consider FIGS. 6B and 6C, which show the dispersion relation for two waveguide configurations: x=a/2 (symmetric) and x=0 (asymmetric). Only the first mode is shown for the sake of simplicity. In the symmetric waveguide, d(x)=d+2 cos(qx), and the single mode propagation is equivalent to wave propagation in an unbounded medium with a permittivity that varies periodically like d(x). The dispersion for this case reveals typical Bragg gaps at the BFBZ as shown in FIG. 6B.

[0049] In the asymmetric case, x=0 and d(x) is constant for all x. Thus, the wave does not undergo Bragg reflection. However, the waveguide possesses translational symmetry and the dispersion can be represented as the folded modes shown in FIG. 6C. This unique propertyi.e., the gapless spectrumis a result of the nature of the periodicityi.e., the lateral periodicity that keeps the spacing d constant for all x, as in a flat waveguide.

[0050] The GBR condition follows from Equations (3a) and (3b) at k.sub.x=0 and can be written in terms of wave numbers, geometric parameters, or wavelengths using Equations (5a)-(5c), respectively:

[00008]$\begin{array}{cc}{k}_{y,1,m}.Math.d=d.Math.\sqrt{k_{y,0,p}^2-q^2}=m.Math..Math.,& \left(5.Math.a\right)\\ d=\frac{a}{2}.Math.\sqrt{p^2-m^2},& \left(5.Math.b\right)\\ d=p.Math.\frac{{}_0}{2}=m.Math.\frac{{}_1}{2},.Math.\left(p>m\right)& \left(5.Math.c\right)\end{array}$

where .sub.0 and .sub.1 are wavelengths of the standing waves of the 0.sup.th and the first spatial harmonics, respectively. From Equation (5b), the GBR between the fundamental k.sub.y,0,1 and first harmonics k.sub.y,1,1 (p=2, m=1) occurs at d=a{square root over (3)}/2 or .sub.1,1=2.sub.0,2=2d. Both waves have uniform amplitudes along the x-axis, i.e., k.sub.x=0 (.sub.x.fwdarw.), but periodic amplitude profiles along the y-axis as shown in FIG. 6A.

[0051] The GBR occurs in the asymmetric waveguide if the cutoff frequency of the first harmonics k.sub.y,1,1 coincides with the cutoff frequency of the 0.sup.th harmonic of the second mode k.sub.y,0,2, as shown in FIG. 6C. In this figure the folded dispersion of the first mode (p=1) intersects the cutoff frequency of the second mode (p=2) at k.sub.x=0 and f=11.0 GHz, for the above-mentioned unique mix between the geometric parameters given by Equation (4b) with a=3.15 cm. This means that the cutoff frequencies of the two orthogonal eigenstates k.sub.y,0,2 and k.sub.y,1,1 coincide [FIGS. 6A-6C], and is therefore degenerate.

[0052] The degeneracy is a feature of Bloch resonance and is similar to what occurs in quantum mechanics based on degenerate perturbation theory. More specifically, the degenerate energy level splits into two levels. In the present case, a similar splitting was obtained from the solution of Eq. (3) in the second order of approximation for k.sub.y,0. In this case, the degenerate frequency level splits into two frequencies f.sub.0,2.sup.+ and f.sub.0,2.sup. with a forbidden gap f between them:

[00009]$\begin{array}{cc}{f}_{0,2}^{}=\left[1\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2}.Math.\frac{}{d}.Math.{\left(1+\cos .Math..Math.\right)}^{1/2}\right].Math.f_{0,2},& \left(6.Math.a\right)\\ .Math..Math.f=\frac{\sqrt{2}.Math.}{d}.Math.{\left\{1+\cos \left(\frac{2.Math..Math..Math..Math..Math..Math.x}{a}\right)\right\}}^{1/2}.Math.f_{0,2}.& \left(6.Math.b\right)\end{array}$

where f.sub.0,2 is the cutoff frequency of the second mode (k.sub.y,0,2) of the 0.sup.th harmonic in a flat waveguide. Here, f.sub.0,2.sup.+ is upward shifted with respect to f.sub.0,2, while f.sub.0,2.sup. is downward shifted and corresponds to the cutoff frequency of the first harmonic (k.sub.y,1,1). This is relabeled as f.sub.0,2.sup.f.sub.1,1.sup.+ for emphasis. The amplitude distributions for both waves are shown in FIG. 6A.

[0053] The GBR results in a unique waveguide spectrum; the first mode (p=1) has two cutoff frequencies: lower f.sub.0,1 and upper f.sub.1,1.sup.+. The dispersion in FIG. 6C does not include the Bloch resonance just for clarity of the above explanation. The transformation of the dispersion in FIG. 6C caused by the GBR is shown in FIG. 7. Propagation of the first (p=1) mode is possible only between the two cutoff frequencies f.sub.0,1 and f.sub.1,1.sup.+, and there is a Bloch gap f between the first and second frequencies f.sub.1,1.sup.+ and f.sub.0,2.sup.+ as shown by the shaded area in FIG. 7.

[0054] GBR was investigated for the experimental setup (FIG. 5A). In this system, a=3.15 cm and from Equation (5b) the resonance occurs when d=2.72 cm. For this d, the cutoff frequency of the second mode is f.sub.0,2=11.02 GHz and Equation (6a) gives the shifted cutoff frequencies f.sub.0,2.sup.+=2.69 GHz and f.sub.1,1.sup.+=9.34 GHz. As seen from Equation (6b), the band gap depends on the phase shift between the plates. At x=0, the band gap has a maximum value f=2(/d)f.sub.0,2=3.35 GHz, and at x=a/2, it closes, i.e., f=0. In FIG. 7 the Bloch gap for x=0 (the shaded area between f.sub.0,2.sup.+ and f.sub.1,1.sup.+) is centered at 11.02 GHz.

[0055] Equations (4a) and (4b) show that the Bloch gap can be engineered at any k.sub.x over the entire first Brillouin zone, i.e., from k.sub.x=0 to k.sub.x=q/2, by varying the height d of the waveguide or the period a. The wave vector k.sub.x,gap at which the Bloch gap occurs in a hollow waveguide is given by:

[00010]$\begin{array}{cc}{k}_{x,\mathrm{gap}}=\left(\frac{}{a}\right)\left[1-\left(p^2-m^2\right).Math.{\left(\frac{a}{2.Math.d}\right)}^2\right].& (7\end{array}$

[0056] The disclosure was validated using the experiment of FIG. 5A with two X-band horn antennas and a Hewlett Packard (HP-8510) vector network analyzer (VNA). The waveguide had a width W=6 cm (along the z-axis, into the page) and length L=82 cm. The profiles of the metallic plates had an amplitude =0.415 cm and period a=3.15 cm. The transmission parameter S.sub.21 of the waveguide with a TE.sub.01 mode input was measured in the microwave frequency range 3-17 GHz. FIG. 5B shows the transmission spectrum for two different positions of the upper plate: x=a/2 (lighter line (labeled blue)) and x=0 (darker line (labeled black)) with the plates separated by d=2.72 cm.

[0057] The GBR occurs at x=0 and causes the opening of a 3.2 GHz Bloch gap (between 9.6 and 12.8 GHz) centered at 11.2 GHz. The dispersion (k) for x=0 is shown in FIG. 7. The theoretical value of the Bloch gap is 3.35 GHz as shown by the shaded band below f.sub.0,2.sup.+. Note that the experimental and theoretical results are in good agreement. When the upper plate is shifted by x=a/2, the Bloch gap at 11.2 GHz closes and a 2.0 GHz Bragg gap opens at f.sub.B=7.6 GHz (blue line in FIG. 5B). The Bloch gap is 1.6 times as wide as the Bragg gap and the experimental values are close to the theoretical values of 2.1 GHz and f.sub.B=7.3 GHz. The dispersion curve for x=a/2 is shown in FIG. 6B, which has a 2.1 GHz Bragg gap located at 7.3 GHz, in good agreement with measured data.

[0058] Analogizing the experimental results (using microwaves) to light, if the experimental microwave structure is scaled down to the order of wavelengths of light, then the Bloch mirror would easily confine multiple light components ranging from 650 nm (red) and 475 nm (blue) or even beyond this range.

[0059] Bragg gaps in uniform microfibers with periodic boundary profiles have already found commercial use as strain and temperature sensors. The Bloch phenomena also apply to a periodic medium with a flat boundary, in which case the periodic variation of k.sub.y is due to the periodicity of the refractive index of the medium.

[0060] Bloch resonances and gaps can be tuned by reconfiguring the boundaries and transformative nanoscale implementations could be achieved using acousto-optic, electro-optic, or piezoelectric transducers. For example, an integrated optic equivalent of the microwave setup shown in FIG. 5A could comprise a LiNbO.sub.3 optical waveguide with two surface acoustic waves that are excited on opposite sides of the waveguide and play the same role as the movable boundary plate.

[0061] Another potential application for a Bloch gap structure is a distributed feedback (DFB) laser. Replacing the periodic structure in a conventional DFB laser with a Bloch gap material with a wide band gap at k.sub.x=0 could open up opportunities for a white-light-DFB laser.

[0062] Another potential application is in the field of electronics. In this case, Schrdinger's equation describes the wave phenomena and the operating wavelength is the de Broglie wavelength of an electron in a quantum well. A suitable material for fabricating a periodic quantum well that can support a high mobility two-dimensional electron gas is an AlGaAs/GaAs heterostructure. For a typical electron concentration n.sub.s10.sup.11 cm.sup.2, the de Broglie wavelength of an electron at the Fermi level .sub.F is in the range of 80-100 nm depending on the electron concentration n.sub.s:.sub.F={square root over (2/n.sub.s)}. If the X-band microwave structure (FIG. 5A) is scaled down in accordance with .sub.F, the lateral periodicity of the quantum waveguide should be 80 nm, which is an acceptable scale for nanofabrication.

[0063] Although the present disclosure has been described with respect to one or more particular embodiments, it will be understood that other embodiments of the present disclosure may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present disclosure.